Slashdot Mirror
Linux PDA w/Voice Recognition
Hotaine writes "Lernout & Hauspie is working on a Linux PDA with speech regognition built-in. " It can do things like read (and record) emails, find weather, do stock quotes or whatever. Of course, you can't go out and simply buy the vaporware yet, but it has potential.
And The Wizardry Compiled, I think.
Great books, anyhow. Rick Cook also writes relatively clueful tech articles...
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
And more importantly, I want to know if anyone knows if there are screenshots.
-BrentIt has been out for a long long time now.
My first voice recognition system was Voice Master for the Commodore 64.
I'm sure there is a long list of systems that allready has this feature.
However I'd like to see Linux on that list. A project exists to do just that but I'm unimpressed with the results so far
I don't actually exist.
Which means that Bill will wait for them to make something cool and then make a half-baked port of it to Windows ;)
:-) What we did now was port it to Linux...
Ehm... L&H already does cool stuff on Windows
superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
According to thier site, they did a live demonstration of some of this back in early feb on CNN. Anyone see it? Does it really work? Better yet, is there an opensource, freely available Linux for PDA's out there that may also be doing something similar?
Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
How does one design an electric motor? Would you attach a bathtub to it, simply because one was available? Would a bouquet of flowers help? A heap of rocks? No, you would use just those elements necessary to its purpose and make it no larger than needed-- and you would incorporate safety factors. Function controls design.
--Robert A. Heinlein
disappointed, and waiting to get moderated down :(.
www.HearMySoulSpeak.com
Cool! Why not wait to do a Press Release and fake demo on this until half an hour after the next MSFT vapourware announcement about WinCE?
...
Who needs ethics when we can just get down in the mud with Bill...
And, while we're at it, why not get rid of this whole Open Source concept for this Linux PDA - it's not like we're any different than the old guard
Will in Seattle
On the screen is a talking head
Why have a talking head on screen? Thats about as useful as the dancing paperclip in everyones favorite office suite. If thats all you are going to do with the screen, why just not have a screen. I suppose the screen could be used for displaying data, but please, no talking heads when there is no data to display.
Spyky
The article is from 2/7/2000. I saw this news a long time ago. Are things so slow /. needs to dredge up stuff nearly 2 months old as filler?
You're using your Palm and suddenly somebody yells from across the room "C-D slash enter R-M space dash F-R enter"? Hope you're not root :-)
There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
:wq
hey, not a bad idea.. Sounds like a cross of a keyboard and sound card. .. hopefully you can bind words to key combinations..
A microphone device that can translate your voice to text, and it outputs text into where you plug your keyboard in.
OS independant, usable most anywhere a keyboard can be used. Boy would it fool typing tutors, and alt-ctrl-delete is no longer a three finger salute but
bind "reset" to alt-ctrl-delete, instead of saying "hold alt hold ctrl hold delete release" or something as silly..
fou aje oym asoyf ueyf jaffaq afset su!6j!/\ op 'ua>|7!>| ppn7
This concept is in development through a project at Stanford. The "Total Access Port" (TAP) allows one to use whatever UI they prefer (voice, eye track, chordic keyboard, etc) for any device. The user portion of the device translates their input into UI commands which are interpreted through the TAP port on a device, such as a computer, ATM, microwave, etc. It's primarily designed for the disabled, but holds promise for wider application as well. See Archimedes Tap Project for more details.
----- Indecision is the key to flexibility.
I found three on The Very Big Online Bookstore and found the fourth on Abebooks. They are (maybe in order) The Wizardry Consulted, The Wizardry Cursed, The Wizardry Quested and The Wizard's Bane by Rick Cook. Fun stuff; and this PDA brings us on step closer to making SF^H^H fantasy a reality...
"I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
I know this is offtopic but it needs to be said. I'm so tired of these companies calling every product a 'solution', like we who don't have it all have problems. This article was so thick with marketing jizz i could barely tell what they were describing. Was it a "mobile platform solution for corporate users with mult-cross-world-any-phone support" with "product solutions again?" Why the hell can't they just say they have a nifty PDA that can use speech recognition, even on the go, through a telephone, etc. and it runs linux.
The rest of that was just crap.
I am that that is, not that that is not, that is.
Yea, but do you know his password?
They seem to be all about advances for linux, yet they are using active server pages. Ahh the industry is interesting like that. --jay
I think we can all agree that voice recognition is still in the somewhat early stage, meaning that you may have to adapt your voice to get the thing to work correctly. We could also probably agree that handwriting recognition isn't perfect, you have to adapt your handwriting to get the thing to work correctly. Similar eh?
...hit my head on the wall of the jail where the two of us live today. - TMBG
--------
Pair up in threes. - Yogi Berra
PDA with a wireless modem that can talk. And I will try to be one of those h8x0r d00z and dial up 555-wopr with my PDA, in the park, away from FBI, and have it tell me... Shall we play a game? No longer am I bound by haveing to punch in the cordnates of Redmond or any other evil places, I just yell...Nuke the heck out of billy boy...
Hmm...
Or better yet... Now with my PDA I can be like James Bond, and tell my PDA and my new car with three legged robot where to go while shooting my nerf gun at evil borg's in my back seat...and then I can get apache for PDA and stream it over the internet..
hmm....oh well.
http://www.freebsd.org
BTW...Linuxhaven.com got updated... I fixed it...and had to reset the messages.
http://www.freebsd.org
...but can I get a copy of their speech recognition software for my computer (free would be even better, and open-source, especially for a product from "the professionals", would be super-cool)?
Monotonic computer voice:
BASH Apt COMMAND NOT FOUNDBASH Hem COMMAND NOT FOUND
BASH A-HEM COMMAND NOT FOUND
BASH ! EVENT NOT FOUND
EXECUTING COMMAND DAMN
UNABLE TO DAMN WIRELESS MODEMS.
OOPS - Debian not found. S**t.
Apt-get update.
Ahem... APT-GET update.
A-HEM! APT-GET UPDATE!!!
Damn wireless modems.
Sure, I have a thankless job. That's okay. I have a lot of (non
Did you ever read the Wizardry series? The first two books are bundled as The Wiz Biz. Really entertaining series. Well, the programmer develops a computer system with magic (makes sense in context, hard to explain) with a verbal interface. He calls out to the Emacs from which he does everything...
Alex
It is. For one, these voice to text systems use "close" microphoes. I chatted to some guy from Dragon Systems about it, and even had a go at trying to get his microphone to pick up something that I said, and they just doesn't work like that.
Thad
Thad
Why post it if you cannot buy it? Sure *I* can come up with briliant ideas.....and not have anything to show for it..... lame
Wacked-Support NT
Can't really see this being very useful until they can correctly identify the owner's voice in a crowd of people standing outside in a wind. Until then I won't be buying anything with speech recognition. Why bother training a PDA if it doesn't recognize your voice in places you're most likely to need it? Having things read to you could definitely be useful in a PDA though.
STAR COLON FILE NOT FOUND
ROOT AT LOCALHOST ARROW CURSOR
Maybe it's the psycological factor, but in reality using Linux for a PDA is...*looking for a word that won't start a flame war*...not-smart. Using Windows CE or Windows anything is not smart either. The idea that a smaller scale computer can handle a Macrokernel and do more work than a desktop is appaling. Go invent a microkernel base for PDAs. Make it short and to the point, then have it run the apps you need.
:wq! DOH!
Now on the topic of PDAs. I think the ultimate PDA would be a little thing that looks like the PalmPilot but w/o any buttons or screen inputs. On the screen is a talking head (AT&T In development) and it speaks to you (AT&T in devel, but really fantastic quality alread). It interprets what you say via speach recognition and *looking for the right word* a low level AI language interpreter. You would talk to it, like "Can you remind me to pick up some food?" or "John's e-mail address it blah at blah dot com and he is a moron." And then you can recall the info by saying "Who was john again?" Etc. Etc...like a portable secretary.
Roy Miller
--Roy
Make it a swedish blonde and to hell with Linux.
Another thing... how much does it help to have a portable linux? Do you really care what operating system tells you that you have a doctors appointment in an hour?
Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
I'd be happy to sell you all the vaporware you want ;)
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
HHmmm Open source project?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Ummm . . . you must mean voice recognition secruity.
For those things, as far as the computer is concerned, no, you can't do a perfect impression of Sean Connery. Its not looking for sound patterns that can nessarly be heard by humans. It looks for small subtilities which are considered impossible to fake.
However, this article is talking about a system that will allow you to give commands into a computer and it will act on them (a la Star Trek). In this case, yes, you might be able to pull off an impression of Sean Connery to the computer. But security isn't the point behind such a system, anyway.
----------
Not a typewriter
Which means that Bill will wait for them to make something cool and then make a half-baked port of it to Windows ;)
----------
Not a typewriter
I find it hard to believe that they can pull this off in a PDA. Most speech recognition tends to processor intensive. That is the number one reason most speech software is sitting on the shelf. Also the software requires training in many cases to make it easier on the software and the processor.
Hmm, I heard that same story but it I heard it worked with Philips Freespeech.
/y c:\*.*" would have done trick though.
While they were setting up the demonstration someone in the audience would have said "start" - "run" - "format c:" - "enter".
The thing is, that this would not work enless Windows was installed on the D: drive (which is rather onlikely). "deltree
Monkey sense
Yes, kind of funny in a nerdy sort of way. How many books were there, I only read the first 2.
By the way, not only did it not work well, I had to sit and "train" it for hours by reading it long passages of Treasure Island and Tom Sawyer.
Voice recognition does work if you Read The Fine Manual! I am a technical writer and use Dragon NaturallySpeaking Preferred USB 4.0 on a Windows 98 Pentium III with 128 MB. The only mistakes it makes are my own speaking mistakes.
If it really worked, you wouldn't HAVE to read the Fine manual. Instructions = talk into microphone! Fact is: It works the more you use it (therefore it can adapt to your voice) but the early going is too rough for most.
Right now, voice recognition just plain plain sucks. Learn how to use a DVORAK keyboard and you'll be far better off. And, you won't need a Coppermine with 512MB RAM!!!
-- I've never seen electricity, that's why I don't pay for it.
I recently shelled out close to $200 for a speech recognition software (for PC)...now, it's somewhere in the corner of my room drawing dust. The thing simply didn't perform as advertised; most voice commands I had to repeat 2-3 times before the program picked it up. Perhaps I'm just being close-minded here, but I'm perfectly content with my current keyboard/mouse setup, and probably won't go shopping for anymore voice recognition software in the near future. Hay, typing is the only exercise I get nowadays...don't take that away from me too!
---------------
---------------
JavaScript tutorials scripts
The great thing is it doesn't crash when it doesn't recognize a dictionary word *cough* (windows) *cough*
"I'm sorry Dave an error 1 has occured while you were compiling"
Damn...
I would love them try to patent their version of linux. Anyone ever heard of the GPL?that renders any patent on it virtually useless. However, a hardware patent could probably come out good...
and it will speak you in the Voice of the Devil!!
Why would they patent their version of Linux? The voice recognition is most likely not integrated into the OS...
And I believe they deserve a software patent. People have been working on voice recognition for a long time, and it doesn't work all that great so far... if they did something neat, this is what patents were created to protect...
How much fun would it be if this WAS integrated into the OS? You'd have to give it verbal OS calls instead of common-sense commands... lots of fun.
E.
Does anybody remember a low-budget BBC sci-fi drama from the 1980's called Star Cops? The programme's theme song was by Justin Hayward from the Moody Blues.
Anyway, the main character (a detective called Nathan Spring who was sent out to police a small base on the moon) had this really neat PDA that he called "Box". It was a computer, internet terminal, telephone, diary etc. all rolled into one, and it had a voice interface. And a kind of personality too.
I seem to remember in the end it self-destructed in order to take out some bad guy and save Nathan's life.
Ever since then I've been waiting for these devices to appear. I can't be bothered with handheld computers as they are now, the interface is just too narrowband. I want my own Box.
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Well, Microsoft owns 7 or 8 % of the stock in L&H. The fact that it runs on linux has to do with the fact that it was attempted on WinCE first, but didn't work, in fact. (I happen to work there, and the guy who led the project told me).
superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
I don't know about those products, but for L&H Voice Xpress you need at least 64 Mb of RAM, and preferably even more. So I think those other software packages would need at least as much. Voice recognition isn't easy, ya know ;-)
And it's not running on a Palm, it's running on a Strongarm II.
superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
So you pick a few dozen commands that you do often and that can't do major damage without at least some safewords around them.
Voicetyping things into text input boxes isn't as dangerous - so you put some wrong stuff in a paper you're writing, and it's got the usual interjections from editing and real-world interruptions and phone calls. You can edit that later.
Picking context-sensitive sets of things you actually want to talk to your computer about can be tougher...
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
Unix-like systems give you a lot of flexibility in letting things talk to each other, including keyboards and their substitutes, processes, etc.,
and they're not picky about what hardware really exists as long as it's not too weird.
The critical issues for porting voice to Unix are things like making sure the scheduler has enough hard real-time support that the voice recognizer doesn't starve, working within a multi-process environment, and dealing with kernel-userspace boundaries. For instance, if your voice recognizer provides context-sensitive vocabularies, how do you keep track of which context(s) belong to which processes, and if they're in the kernel or other protected storage space, how do you pass vocabularies to them efficiently?
But most of that's pretty straightforward, and application level, and can't be worse than adding X Windows or NeWS was, and certainly not as difficult as adding TCP/IP had been.
More importantly, if you want to build voice applications, what kind of services do you think an OS will need to support them? Are they available in Linux? Do you need to add them? Is there anything big you have to get rid of to make them work? Sure, you could junk it all and use a capability-based system like the
Extremely Reliable Operating System
or some microkernel thing. But what do you need?
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
Your own PDA is trained with your 'voice'. Have an external plug on any system, then plug your pda into it. Now you have a voice interface anywhere you go.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I don't like the word 'patent' in the first sentence of the paragraph about this thing. Is it a software patent? I am a bit sceptic about this thing......
Grtz, Jeroen
Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
I have used Dragon Naturally Speaking as well as IBM's ViaVoice and neither seem to work too well. I don't think I studder or anything and as far as I can tell I speak pretty clearly. Neither worked well for dictating and they slowed down my computer noticeably. (P200, 48MB) How well can this possibly work on a Palm? Does anyone know what Speech-to-Text engine this uses?
I can see that. When it comes out next year, L&H will change their name to H And L, so that they can call it the 2001 H.A.L. Or, if they chose a more subtle prank, they'll call it the L and H model 1002.
'Holy mirror images, Batman!' -Dick Grayson.
.sig: Now legally binding!
One negative about Voice PDAs, like cellphones, is that you spend time in public talking to yourself while you walk down the street. (Here in my part of San Francisco, half the pedestrians do that because of cellphones, and half because of substance abuse...)
If you add visual displays, e.g. i-Glasses, you're adding extra volume and weight, and you get to walk down the street in Gargoyle mode :-)
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
I dont know if this is a true story, a joke, or just a cute little urban legend, but it also regards voice recognition software. This company had just developed a new, really powerful voice recognition program (this was in the old days when DOS when the most commonly used OS), and they were showing off the software at a press conference. The developers encouraged the reporters to yell out commands and watch the software in action. And immedietally, from the back, some wise guy shouted out "FORMAT C:\, RETURN!" The software worked...
Wonder if there could be an analogous action for this new Palm software.
And when they come out with a marketable version, it will be called HAL.
Gonzo
First off, I work for L&H, so if I sound biassed, hey, they pay for my bandwith... But at least I am an engineer and not a salesperson ;-)
;-)
I saw a demo of this thing a couple of weeks ago. Basically what they did was port the Voice Xpress engine to linux, and make it work on a Strongarm II processor. Right now all that was built was a single prototype, and some issues like battery usage are still to be worked out before the thing goes into production. (Estimate : end of this year)
What was also done, was building in the L&H Realspeak synthesized voice. This allows real dialogues to be held with this device. For instance :
-Check mail !
-You have five new messages
-Summarize !
-Message one, sender is J. Random Hacker, Subject : kernel hack. Message two, sender is Bill Gates, Subject is Make money Fast...
-Read the first message !
-Hi there... I just finished a patch for the latest kernel update... blablabla...
-Reply !
You could then use this to dictate an e-mail (because it uses a full Voice Xpress engine), or order books on Amazon (If you wanted to shop there) using WAP. All in all, a pretty nifty device. I want one myself
And no, it was not vapourware, it really works : with the VX engine you can already get 95% accuracy if you want to, with a large vocabulary. The smaller the vocabulary, the better the recognition. How many commands do you need to read your e-mail ? You do the math.
Oh, yeah, it also has a stylus and screen that fold away into it, just in case you really wanted to read or write stuff.
superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
In general, taking an operating system and strapping a new paradigm to it is a Bad Idea.
When Microsoft took DOS, a single-user operating system, and added Windows to it, they ended up with a really terrible hack that didn't run either, up until about version 3.1.
When Microsoft later took Windows and added pen support (not CE, but Pen Windows--read your history!), it flopped. Windows wasn't suitable.
When they attempted to port a subset of NT to pen-based devices, they got CE, which has underperformed.
On the other hand...
When Apple abandoned the Apple II and designed the Mac as a graphically-operated machine from the ground up, they got a great platform.
When Palm threw out common notions of a shrunken PC and designed their device from scratch, they won.
My point is that a good voice-controlled system needs to be designed as a good voice-controlled system. Strapping it on after the fact won't cut it.
Me: "p-w-d"
Computer: "slash"
Me: "l-s"
Computer: "slash u-s-r, slash h-o-m-e, slash b-i-n, slash b-o-o-t, slash e-t-c..."
Me: "cd slash e-t-c"
Computer: *silent*
Me: "vi profile"
computer: (reads file contents)
Me: "quit"
computer: "error"
Me: "exit"
computer: "error"
Me: "wq"
computer: "file is read only"
Me: "q!"
That's my kinda computing
-josh