Slashdot Mirror


Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film

buzzlightyear writes: "The Sept. 12 Chicago Tribune has an article headlined "Sparkling discovery for science" , about the development of ultrananocrystalline diamond film. The scientist who developed this, Dieter Gruen, started by experimenting with fragmented buckyballs, and had proven its properties in 1994, but he is only now receiving recognition and an award from the Materials Research Society. Preliminary tests show that ultrananodiamonds are 1,000 more wear-resistant than silicon, and 1 million times denser than conventional crystals. This makes them a practical base material for micromachines and other devices that had only been theoretically possible before. Maybe this will mark the real beginning of Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age."

160 comments

  1. here is a link by Alien54 · · Score: 3
    You can find an abstract, with other links on that page

    - - - - - - - -
    "Never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem."

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  2. not for electronics by Beckman · · Score: 2
    Sure it's wear resistant, but the electronic properties are poor because it is polycrystalline.

    If someone would develope a technique for cheap, easy to produce, single crystal films, then you'd have a huge break through.

    1. Re:not for electronics by Zaaf · · Score: 1

      Sure it's wear resistant, ...

      No, it's not. It is only a thousand times more wear resistant than the silicon substrate they use in micro machines, which are worn out within a few minutes.
      So let's say that the silicon micro machine will last for 10 minutes, then then the diamond coated micro machine will last for about seven days. When implanted to help your kidneys or your heart, it still will have to be replaced every week.

      ---

      --

      ---
      "Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a sick mind." (Terry Pratchett)
  3. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by kootch · · Score: 2
    maybe you're reading some of your own subconscious into those texts because I didn't pick up the incest part, nor did I think that there was a racist problem in Cryptonomicon.

    and btw, socialogical is sociological, from socio- logia (latin)

    oh, and Heinlin wrote non-perverted sci-fi? what about the sexual explots of Lazarus Long, who had sex with his mother as well as all of his sisters?

    If I remember correctly, Stranger in a Strange Land was about 40% sex, 90% of which was out of marriage, 50% of which was between blood relatives.

  4. Pesky buckyballs (was argonne lab info) by vheissu · · Score: 1

    Pretty exciting stuff, until you get halfway down the article and discover that they made it with buckyballs. Doen't eople realize that there is no large scale (ie greater than a few hundred molecule at a time) process for making these things, after more than 15 years! Sure they're amazing, but at thousands of dollars a milligram, there isn't much use. When we can either a) find a large scale production method for either fullerenes or nanotubes, or b) make a proper nanoassembler, that will be one thing. Until then, all this talk is even less meaning full than those 1950s Popular Mechanics articles that proclaimed flying cars for all within the decade...

    --
    /* This post not warrantied for mission critical applications. */
  5. Diamond Film VERY OLD news by Garund · · Score: 1
    I know an ex-special, special forces guy who has told me about some of the of mind-numbing sci-fi bits of technology he was equipped and trained with a number of years back. One of his ex-team mates who remains in the military was visiting, and he described some of the Star-Trek shit currently in use.

    If what I heard is worth taking at face value, then I think the sad little info releases about 'recent' technological advances we see available for public consumption are the result of an orchestrated control over the time line on which the general public is kept in regard to scientific advancement. As far as I can figure, we're at LEAST thirty five years away from having access, (both physical and psychological), to the kind of tech a select few currently take for granted.

    Kinda sucks.

    One of the main applications in the instance of this fine crystaline stuff, (which was not even mentioned either in the article or on Slashdot), was in the area of battery architecture.

    If any of this is true, then most of us here at Slashdot are playing in tune like a bunch of damned lemmings to a timed beat metered out by others. Feel the joy.

    -Garund

    "I'll see it when I believe it."

    1. Re:Diamond Film VERY OLD news by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2
      Conspiracy buff, eh? I don't blame you.

      Of course, this "innovation" has been around for a while, but has been ruthlessly suppressed by a secret cabal of Razor Blade Manufacturing Industries. It could ruin their whole marketing model.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    2. Re:Diamond Film VERY OLD news by Garund · · Score: 1
      Bic! You're right! It IS all Bic's fault! All the pieces are coming together!

      I knew those stupid pens were evil.

      Did you ever notice back in school when one of their pens, 'accidentally' exploded and bled ink, that the student it stained would get kinda glassy eyed and highly receptive?

      Extra curricular activities, my ass. I wonder what we've REALLY been trained for?

      -Garund

      (Conspiracy buff? Hm. Maybe. I do avoid things like air-miles, and I do distrust large corps because they keep doing morally objectionable things, like ignoring safety standards and employing children in third world nations, etc. And in the case of my previous post, I'm just relaying what I've heard from sources I know personally, which seem to me more reliable than the average newspaper article, which comes from who-knows-where).

  6. It's not MEANT for electronics by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    It's to use when fabricating little tiny gears and components. For actual physical work at very small scales.

  7. Re:Um, not at all. by Manax · · Score: 1
    Why do you say "obviously"? I didn't think it was that clear from that paragraph in the article...

    After rereading the article's paragraph (several times), I'll agree that it is talking about the size of crystal produced, rather than density.... but saying "fits inside" is a rather confusing phrase when talking about things at the atomic level. (Whereas talking about suns or planets "fitting inside" is much more clear, to me at least.)

    --
    "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
  8. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by Rational · · Score: 1

    It must be that I haven't had enough caffeine today if I can't decide whether to moderate this up or down.

    Off to get some joe, then... Need to wake up my sense of humour.

    Still, for another example of Stephenson getting things frighteningly right, check out the Wired article on immense cargo airships. I have actually visited the company, and it looks for all the world that they know what they are doing (if the size of the hangar is anything to go by).

    --
    "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  9. Re:Auspicious, but by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 3
    Ah yes, Werner Von Braun. He aimed for the stars... and often hit London.

    But did he hit any of the stars in London? They've always had good theater there. (Or would that be theatre?)
    ___

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  10. Why? by sips · · Score: 1

    Well from what I gather from other posters supposedly with nanites you can create almost anything you want. One of the reasons that the British wanted colonies was for the economics and raw materials. So in a society that can create anything at all what would be the use of irritating a large mass of people who would just wish you harm?

    --
    Respond to s
    1. Re:Why? by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

      That's a big part of the book I don't understand, either.

  11. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by kootch · · Score: 1

    sorry, not Stranger in a Strange Land, but "To Sail Beyond the Sunset"

    Stranger was the last one I read... kinda had it on the brain

  12. But the cost... by SpookComix · · Score: 1
    ...is certainly going to be a helluva lot more than one third your salary.

    --SpookComix

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    1. Re:But the cost... by klund · · Score: 2

      ...is certainly going to be a helluva lot more than one third your salary.

      Yes, but at least that money would be going to some nano-technology buckyball-growing cool-ass research group, instead of going to bankroll more civil wars in Africa. How many people died for that jewel on your honey's finger?

      How else can two months' salary last forever? By keeping corrupt diamond-friendly regimes in power.
      -- DeBeers, Corrupting Africa since 1870.

      see http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ben_inker/DeBeers.ht m

      Off Topic: when the hell did it become "one third your salary"? I remember when it was one month! Now we're supposed to spend four months working to artificially inflate the value of a rather common mineral for the benefit of the DeBeers cartel and to the detriment of the third world. No thanks.
      --

      --
      My word processor was written by Stanford Professor Donald Knuth. Who wrote yours?
  13. Expensive sand paper? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    For grinding anything.

    Fancy glitter material for expensive clothes and
    houses?

    New electronics substrate (Carbon has same valence
    as Silicon).

  14. Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by arete · · Score: 4

    I love Heinlein. His books changed my life. I idolize him. But you do seem somewhat deluded.

    Early in his career he wrote very wholesome books - which were Juvenile Fiction (include Starship Troopers, which movie really depressed me) meaning they were written for kids. Which is great, especially considering the reading level is above most adult books these days. Maybe you only read his little kids books.

    Later on he wrote fewer juvenile books, and more adult ones. (There is some cronological overlap between the categories. But the books are usually labeled.) These were not "wholesome" in any way. Juvenile or not was based largely on the applied themes.

    I'd agree he had issues. Almost every adult contained orgies of some sort, usually with all the protagonists, and many contained various other "free thinking" sexual practices. I doubt he ever had anyone punished for incest. People who were abusive were likely to get punished, although his books were realistic enough that this didn't always happen.

    But I love him. He was smart and experienced. He was dead-on about most people, imho. And he was honest about things. And I agree that he hit to the heart of a lot of people by being honest.

    Another recommendation: The Sensuous Dirty Old Man, by Dr. A (Issac Asimov) I was very surpised when I read this book. I've since decided that good science fiction writers are smart and have few delusions, and that only delusions can keep you from being a sick bastard.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by B.+Samedi · · Score: 2

      I'd hardly call such novels as Revolt in 2100, Starship Trooper and The Puppet Masters juveniles.

      I don't know about Revolt in 2100 or Puppet Masters but Starship Troopers was intended to be a juvenille, albiet for older children (10 and above). Kinda hard to believe when today's juvenille literature is (for the most part) one step above moronic.

    2. Re:Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Nope. Asimov just loved limericks. He had total recall, and entertained cons with his wit and memory for dirty jokes and puns.

    3. Re:Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "Starship Troopers" was intended to be a juvenile, the last one in that series. But the publisher took issue with the intense political demagoguery, and it was eventualy classified as an adult book.

      "Puppet Masters" was an adult book; it had sex of a sort in it. Revolt in 2100 was a story commissioned by John Campbell, and was an adult story, not one of the Schribner's juveniles (of which there were 12).

      As for moronic, think of anime, the SF version of bad comics for the slow. The collective SF imagination is eroding into the sludge of derivative book series, TV and movie science fiction with NO science, and badly dubbed wish-fulfillment fantasies dubbed from the Japanese. Who reads books anymore?

    4. Re:Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by kisrael · · Score: 1
      In the spring, a young man's fancy
      lightly turns to thoughts of what
      The older man, throughout the year,
      Has never even once forgot
      Isaac Asimov, "The Sensuous Dirty Old Man"

      Still, I didn't like the book that much, it seemed to be little more than a goofy parody of some of the sexual selfhelp books of the era.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    5. Re:Heinlein, RA: hero; Dr A book recommendation by arete · · Score: 1

      then either you already knew a lot more than I did, or you didn't know enough, or you didn't read it carefully enough.

      I think it is perfectly the antithesis of the PC approach to interaction, and I think it's goals of frank honesty & why it's NOT really dirty are beautiful. Every jock has mastered the first. The conservative religious and deeply cloistered respectful nerds the second. Together is a rarer combination.

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  15. Re:Stephenson has to wait for Clark by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1
    But wait, don't get too confused, at the end of 2033(isn't that the last of the trilogy?)

    The four books were: 2001, 2010, 2061, and 3001.
    ___

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  16. Re:a million times desnser? by Manax · · Score: 1
    I concede the point regarding an incorrect interpretation in the summary, and I agree Gruen didn't increase the density by 10^6. To quote myself:

    After rereading the article's paragraph (several times), I'll agree that it is talking about the size of crystal produced, rather than density.... but saying "fits inside" is a rather confusing phrase when talking about things at the atomic level. (Whereas talking about suns or planets "fitting inside" is much more clear, to me at least.)

    However, I do wonder why you believe that having some quantity of carbon at a higher density than some other density would immediately change the effects of gravity on it... thus plumetting it through the planet.

    --
    "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
  17. Re:A step closer... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Actually a couple years ago, I was reading about somebody who wanted to coat the blades of various tools with some sort of vaccuum deposited diamond film (possibly this... I don't know too much about this process, the think i was reading also involved vaccuum chambers and heavy hydrogen and bombarding stuff with microwaves... didn't sound like too practical a process on an industrial scale).. That was in 93 or so, so it was probably something different... This sounds cool though =:-)
    If I am not mistaken, the process involved some CO2 atmosphere in an oven, and bombarding a plate glass with carefully phased ultrasonic waves. Within hours, the glass was coated in a very thin but scratch-proof diamond film.
  18. Say that five times fast... by mholve · · Score: 1
    Say that fives times fast...

    "Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film",
    "Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film",
    "Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film",
    "Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film",
    "Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film",

    Whew!

    1. Re:Say that five times fast... by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

      Oh come on!

      Everybody knows these is no such thing as a phantom Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film. Saying its name five times in front of the mirror will never result in U.D.F. appearing behind you with a diamond hook on its hand. That's just another urban legend. A myth.

      Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film! Yeah, right!

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Say that five times fast... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      I say DiKote, a la Shadowrun (or Shadowrunner as Katz would call it). Sounds a lot cooler than "buckysheet" ;)

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    3. Re:Say that five times fast... by fluffhead · · Score: 2

      I think we need a new name for it. Perhaps "buckysheet" would do.

      #include "disclaim.h"
      "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak

      --

      #include "disclaim.h"
      "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
    4. Re:Say that five times fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      think we need a new name for it. Perhaps "buckysheet" would do.

      let's go even further: buckysheet -> B.S.
  19. Re:Here's a way to fix global warming by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Use this process to coat the rings and cylinder wall for my trucks engine. While there at it, coat everything that rubs or has water running through it. With its low coefficient of friction, and long wear, the engine will double in horsepower, get twice the mileage and practically never wear out (with proper maintenance).

    My car has a truck engine in it (I have an '89 240SX, which has the KA24E motor. It's the same as the Nissan pickup from the same year) and it DOES get twice the mileage. Well, maybe not twice, but I pick up 30 mpg freeway. No joke.

    You'd get a better increase in performance at a cheaper cost by just using buckyballs as lubricant.

    Also, where do you think cars go when you get rid of them? Someone else buys them. If they're totalled, they get crushed, and recycled, and made into - Yep, you guessed it - cars, among other things.

    If you're really worried about using this technology to improve your environment, figure out some way to use it to improve battery life, so we can all drive electrics. While you're at it, figure out a way to use it to make high-power photovoltaic cells...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. why by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    is Neal Stephenson so goddamn good at predicting things that happen to show up later on? (more or less, and stuff)
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    ICQ# 77863057

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:why by heliocentric · · Score: 1

      Probably in their niche predicting things like this is like two years ago saying "someday we will have a computer running at 1Gz." It's a combination of being in the know and seeing the invevitable - but when it happens (is discovered, refine, produced, etc...) we are no less excited having heard someone's predictions.

      --
      Wheeeee
    2. Re:why by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Nob... I hope you're just kidding. Nary a bloody thing is cribbed from Gibson. Not the tone, feel, pace, setting, tech, details, NOTHING... Such nobbery...

    3. Re:why by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Actually, diamond age rips basically nothing off of Gibson.

      Snow crash and Diamond Age are not even remotely similar in setting, or in theme.

      Not a trace of Gibson in it.

      Gibson barely touches on nanotech in his latest books...

    4. Re:why by bluesninja · · Score: 1

      because he rips off everything from William Gibson, thats why.

      Okay, so I've only read Snow Crash. But what a derivative piece of generic "cyberpunk" tripe! I couldn't figure out why anyone got excited over that piece of crap. "Lets see: two parts Neuromancer; one part Shadowrun; mix until lumpy and stale." - Neal Stephenson.

      this is not a troll. i repeat: this is not a troll. this is actually my opinion.

      /bluesninja

    5. Re:why by B.+Samedi · · Score: 2

      But what a derivative piece of generic "cyberpunk" tripe! I couldn't figure out why anyone got excited over that piece of crap. "Lets see: two parts Neuromancer; one part Shadowrun; mix until lumpy and stale."

      At what point does this copy Neuromancer? I've read both of these books several times and I can't see your point. Neuromancer was dark and brooding. Snow Crash was actually rather upbeat. There stories weren't even really similar except for them both falling into the Quest theme of stories (if that's your point then Neuromancer is ripping off the Lord of the Rings triology). In respects to Shadowrun, it is itself a mix of several different styles and is meant to be, it's a game. As for lumpy and stale? This was the book that many critics give credit for breathing life into what was seen as a dying genre. And it flowed quite well, except for the ending but I'm willing to forgive it due to the rest of the book. And I hardly see how it was generic. The Shadowrun books... that's generic tripe.

      As for the rest of his work, go read Cryptonomicon (it's finally in paperback) or Zodiac (really good and one of his first if a bit hard to find). Read Diamond Age but be prepared to be confused. It's pretty dense with the language at points and the plot jerk a little every now and then.

      To sum up, I must say that I've never read a Stephenson book that I disliked. And Diamond Age is worth it just for the line near the end about the barbarian princess... I still get shivery reading it.

    6. Re:why by (void*) · · Score: 3
      Theory 1: Neal Stephenson is God.

      Theory 2: Neal Stephenson reads and talks to researchers on the forefront of research, assumes they achieve their goals and asks "then what"?

      I'm betting on 1.

    7. Re:why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neal Stephenson is not God, he is his prophet.

    8. Re:why by b0z · · Score: 1

      Neal Stephenson isn't the first. Leonardo DaVinci was even more of a genius at predicting things like that and actually inventing them. After all, he did design the helicopter...well, it just didn't work the way he had designed, but still he did come up with it first. :o)

      --
      Mas vale cholo, que mal acompañado.
    9. Re:why by pallex · · Score: 1

      Well, its not diamond, and it wont be the start of a new age.

      Apart from that, hes spot on.

  21. Re:Chinese in Stephenson's books by schussat · · Score: 1
    Don't forget Judge Fange from Diamond Age. He's a savvy Confucian hipster if there ever was one.

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
  22. Re:You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by jelark · · Score: 1

    Who's smoking what? There was actually more plantlife during various phases of the earth's lifetime. The most notable being shortly before the dinosaurs died out about 60 million years ago.

  23. Auspicious, but by thunder-in-pants · · Score: 2

    What is the time from prototype to production? I get the feeling this is like the first rocket made by Von Braun and we are waiting to go to the moon.

    --

    Listen, Sigmund, we'll discuss it in the morning.

    1. Re:Auspicious, but by acacia · · Score: 1

      Not often enough to matter!

      --
      ~Religion is O.K., as long as it gets you laid.
    2. Re:Auspicious, but by SpyceQube · · Score: 3
      Ah yes, Werner Von Braun. He aimed for the stars... and often hit London.

      --
      "Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi"
  24. Re:The NanoDiamond Engagement Ring by K8Fan · · Score: 2
    We must respect evil, and we must make evil respect us.

    Off-topic, but this reminded me of a great bumper-sticker I recently saw:

    Knowledge is Power
    Power Corrupts
    Study Hard
    Be Evil
    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  25. The NanoDiamond Engagement Ring by bguilliams · · Score: 3

    I thought it was a great breakthrough in technology, but my girlfriend didn't see it that way.

    --
    We must respect evil, and we must make evil respect us.
    1. Re:The NanoDiamond Engagement Ring by .sig · · Score: 1

      Well, she probably didn't see it at all. With this, you could make a ring that you'd need a microscope to see. (Of course, it'd be even more expensive than the old kind)
      I was thinking more along the lines of a replacement for Kevlar vests... Just how bulletproof is this???

      --
      -Space for rent
    2. Re:The NanoDiamond Engagement Ring by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2

      Yes! "Growing Diamonds". Excellent.

      "Uh...honey, look what I grew ..I mean bought you today. Cost me a lot of moneeeeyyy!"

      --
      Sig it.
    3. Re:The NanoDiamond Engagement Ring by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1
      • I was thinking more along the lines of a replacement for Kevlar vests... Just how bulletproof is this???
      Diamonds are hard, yes, but still prone to shattering. The facets on a diamond are cut, remember, by controlled fragmenting.

      My guess would be that such a vest would not only be deliriously expensive, but would probably protect you from a single shot, thus shattering and embedding several razor sharp diamond shards in your torso. Youch!

      --

      "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

  26. Re:You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    ...and diamonds are the compressed carbon remains of....oh! that's just too creepy!

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  27. Important uses. by Matt2000 · · Score: 5


    "Preliminary tests show that ultrananodiamonds are 1,000 more wear-resistant than silicon, and 1 million times denser than conventional crystals." The new material will immediately go into use as packaging for products such as cassette tapes, finally fulfilling science's dream of "the most irritating fuckin' thing to open of all time."

    --

    1. Re:Important uses. by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

      actually, what about something so simple as cd-rom's that are scratch-proof?
      Great idea! As useful as coating eyeglasses and contacts lenses.

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Important uses. by kootch · · Score: 1

      actually, what about something so simple as cd-rom's that are scratch-proof?

    3. Re:Important uses. by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      This has apparently already been in use for years on all TDK VHS cassettes wrappers. :-)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Important uses. by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      heh, the MPAA doesn't want you to use VHS cassettes...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    5. Re:Important uses. by handle · · Score: 1

      Wait until they put airline peanuts in it.

  28. Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

    Hmm, Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film, huh? Does this remind anyone else of DiKote from ShadowRun?

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film... by Luminous · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean 'ShadowRunner'?

      Sorry, couldn't resist the opportunity. I'm not a Katz-basher, I swear, I'm not.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  29. Re:Good one... by fluffhead · · Score: 2
    Just thought up another one....
    UNCLE
    Ultra Nano CrystalLinE
    (Cue theme from "The Man from U.N.C.L.E.")

    (offtopic) I'm surprised they haven't done an "U.N.C.L.E." movie yet - what with MI:2 and so forth.... I guess, that with the Cold War over, the novelty of having a Russian and an American agent working together doesn't really mean that much anymore, though.

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak

    --

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
  30. how are carbon MEMS any better than silicon? by crgrace · · Score: 4
    Which gets at the real beauty of Gruen's work. Now these astounding, tiny machines are much closer to reality than ever before, at a time when there is an intense international push to develop these microscopic machines--known as MEMS.

    MEMS, Microelectromechanical systems, could very well be a revolutionary technology with such applications ranging from tiny actuators for robots or satellites to small, efficient inductors in radio-frequency integrated circuits. While this article implies carbon-diamond MEMS could be revolutionary, it gives no indication they'd be practical.

    Remember, silicon (and all semiconductors, including carbon) has a diamond structure, so presumably using these buckyball carbon diamonds would be better. The problem is, how would we fabricate them cheaply?

    The key reason silicon micromachines dominate the market for things such as automobile airbag sensors is because they are able to leverage already highly advanced silicon fabrication technologies originally developed for integrated circuits. No such technology exists for pure carbon and developing one would cost an unbelieveably large amount of money and take many years. There had better be some compelling reason for us to do so.

    Many times technologies "better" than silicon have come out only to remain niche technologies. A good example is III-V semiconductors such as Gallium Arsenide. While they are indispensible for lasers and such, they are not used for integrated circuits nearly as much as silicon, because they are so damn expensive. Their current main use, RF power amps and fiber-optic receivers, is quickly being impinged upon by advanced silicon CMOS technologies.

    My point is that this discovery is pretty interesting, but it is far from "revolutionary". Until someone comes up with a killer app that provides a compelling reason to justify the expense to develop this further, I'm going to keep my money on silicon-based micromachines.

    1. Re:how are carbon MEMS any better than silicon? by baywulf · · Score: 1

      "A good example is III-V semiconductors such as Gallium Arsenide. While they are indispensible for lasers and such, they are not used for integrated circuits nearly as much as silicon, because they are so damn expensive."

      The other problem with Gallium Arsenide is that it gives you GaAs ;-)

    2. Re:how are carbon MEMS any better than silicon? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      If this diamond film could be produced cheaply enough (and the article make no mention of whether that is possible), I believe the intention is to use it as microscopic moving parts, in applications where silicon wears to quickly. Once it became possilbe to create microscopic engines, the "compelling reason" would exist.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  31. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by drivers · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Read the last paragraph.
    IHBT. IHL. IWHAND.

  32. Re:What the hell is the "Diamond Age" about? by laxian · · Score: 1

    in the book, windows are made of diamond. imagine anything that needs to be clear and hard being made of diamond! also diamond edged sharp stuff (besides drills ... like a microscopic diamond edged buzzsaw on a knife sized blade). diamond imacs instead of lucite? ;) (:christian:)

    --

    our written thoughts are gifts to our future selves

  33. Hey! Micromachines! by MWoody · · Score: 1
    This makes them a practical base material for micromachines...
    Cool. My little brother kept stepping on all his little cars and planes; it'll be nice to see them made from something other than plastic.

    I don't know if he's gonna be thrilled with the '5 million dollars per set' pricetag, though...
    ---

  34. Re:It's a book by Neil Stephenson by smartin · · Score: 4

    Somehow I think you (and severaly other posters) completely missed the point on the Neo-Victorian society. One of the common themes (if you can count two books) in Stephensons work is the idea that organized goverments will ultimately break down in the face of technology. In both Snow Crash and Diamond Age, the result is a large number of smaller goverments formed around some sort of shared ideal or commercial culture. In Diamond Age, it just so happens that one of the main groups in the book are a set of people organized around a shared ideal based on a Victorian society. This is not a prediction that nano technology will morph americans into neo Victorians, it is just an example of one possible group that may form in a world where large governments based on geographical borders no longer make sense.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  35. Re:Chinese in Stephenson's books by Ben+Wolfson · · Score: 1
    Unless I'm misremembering, the scary Asian general in Cryptonomicon is Japanese, not Chinese.
    While most generals may be scary madmen (:-), WW2 Japan certainly had some.
    General Wing was Chinese.
  36. Now viruses can infect people, not just computers by Water+Paradox · · Score: 1
    Ever since I first heard about viruses in elementary school 20 years ago, how they're dead and yet reproduce, I figured they were leftover remnants of some ancient technology, like something created by the Egyptians during their pyramid-designing years 10,000 years ago. Now look! We have the ability to manufacture them as well. Don't think it won't happen, either: we already have inferior biological weapons in stockpiles bigger than Rhode Island, I saw some once driving through Montana, a vast valley full of small bunkers full of biological weapons, separated into caches so they're less dangerous...

    Anyway the point is, we have the ability to create biological viruses with nanotechnology, and someone will do it. Perhaps the next war will not be in outer space, but in little microships zooming around in a human body.

    -Water Paradox

    --
    information is immaterial
  37. Space Elevator by dragoon6868 · · Score: 1

    This ties in with the story done a day or two ago about the space elevator. Perhaps these nanodiamonds? could be used to coat some or all of the elevator to better protect it from the wear and tear of space. Just a suggestion. Does this mean that this material is stronger than a diamond?

    1. Re:Space Elevator by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

      Im not sure about the normal wear and tear of space, but they could be used for wear and tear down here closer to the ground.

      I guess out there the danger comes not quite from wear but from collisions with debris...

      I don't know if a thin coat of ultrananocrystalline watchamacallits would help. I mean, they could be made strong enough to withstand such an impact, I guess, but then the stuff they're protecting would shatter from the shock or something.

      That would be funny. Kind of like Daffy Duck's Anti-disintegrating Vest, which wont disintegrate (or protect the owner from disintergating, either!)

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  38. Re:Tiny spying machines. by spineboy · · Score: 1

    But they would be killed by my nano-tech pet dragonfly or wasp. Better yet a minnie stealth or tomcat fighter plane shooting down all the bugs in my apartment or around me when I go outside in the summer.

    "House, can you send the stealth bomber into my room - there's a mosquito in here."

    [RODGER, WILCO......TARGET ACQUIRED....DESTROYED.....ANALYZING....99.98% CONFIDENCE TARGET WAS BIOLOGICAL....RETURNING TO BASE]

    "Thanks house, lights out and G'night!"

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  39. Portland or Bust by Baldrson · · Score: 3
    The total market, now estimated at $5-6 billion, is forecast to reach $14 to $40 billion by 2002 by various studies" (R&D Magazine, July 1999).

    With growth rates like 40% to 50%, and present market at %5-6 billion, the portland Portland/Eugene's silicon foundry industry may spawn mass-production machine tools taking in mechanical CAD drawings from the Internet and delivering you a box full of complex semicustom electromechanical devices for only a few thousand of dollars.

    Porland/Eugene already has the highest growth rate in the world of any major high tech area.

  40. Ok, um the reference isn't really a good thing... by bitrott · · Score: 2

    Stephenson's nano world wasn't a nice place where a boy and his nanite played in green fields and chased butterflies. It was a world crappier by far because of the destruction rendered by nanites so thick they filled the air, killed by chaning your blood chemistry, and shut down your nervous system in moments. I'm not saying this isn't a great discovery, but Stepenson's tale of caution should be used to highlight a darker potential...

  41. Re:What the hell is the "Diamond Age" about? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    It's not really about diamonds; the title simply refers to the age of mankind as 'the diamond age', as mankind can produce, at will, diamond materials effortlessly. These days, such a feat would be considered impossible. So.. diamond instead of glass. It basically is a reference to the mastery of nanotech.

  42. Gamma -Ray Lasers by obiquody · · Score: 1

    Another interesting application of diamond films is their use in constructing gamma ray lasers.

    It's hard to make such a device, based on the fact that there is not enough energy in an electronic transition to make gamma frequency emmisions. So, instead of electonic transitions, you rely on *nuclear* transitions. You have to pump the nucleus of an unstable isotope with x-rays to acheive population inversion inside the nucleus.

    Anyways, you also have to imbed the radionucleide in a matrix, namely thin film diamond. I think the gamma ray laser project was one of the last SDI funded research projects in the 90's. I think they got the whole concept to work, but I'm not sure if it got developed further.

    -->OBQT

  43. Literary Precedent by rellort · · Score: 1

    Several posts have pointed out the foreshadowing of this technology in the fictional works of Stephenson and others.

    While there are certain similarities, no one has yet mentioned the book Go At Secopholix by Donald Kunch.

    Actually, I'm not too surprised. It was an utterly forgettable book. Where it not the only thing I had in the lab during a long summer internship, I would have never bothered with it. Kunch is respectable physicist but, quite frankly, a horrible story teller.

    Nevertheless, this exact technology played a pivotal role in the storyline. Now that it is quickly becoming science fact instead of science fiction, I'm interested in re-reading the book. Perhaps old Don knew more than it seemed at the time.

    I've checked FatBrain but can't find it. I'd hate to use Amazon.... Does anybody know somewhere else I might look?

    --

    -- In the future, everyone will code Perl for 15 minutes. --
  44. a million times desnser? by Demi-Guod! · · Score: 5

    ultrananodiamonds are 1,000 more wear-resistant than silicon, and 1 million times denser than conventional crystals.

    A million times denser would give one cubic centimeter of the stuff a mass of several metric tons. What the article actually says is:

    1 million crystals in Gruen's diamond film can fit inside the crystal produced by conventional methods

    Which means that the crystals are a million times SMALLER, not denser.

    D

    1. Re:a million times desnser? by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

      However, I do wonder why you believe that having some quantity of carbon at a higher density than some other density would immediately change the effects of gravity on it... thus plumetting it through the planet.

      THat's easy. You get the same weight but in a lower volume, and assuming the shape remains the same, a lower area of contact (is that the right term? or is it point of contact? or something else?) with anything underneath. So a spectacular increase of density would mean that the same area would have to sustain a really, really bigger weigth. Therefore punching a hole in whatever material it may be.

      It's like resting a knife on its side over a balloon instead of on its point. Same mass, but reduce the area of contact and blammo, no more balloon.

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:a million times desnser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The point is that there is an error in the slashdot summary.

      The poster above was trying to point out that it's not possible to have a material that dense. Unless you are inside of a star or black hole or something.

    3. Re:a million times desnser? by Demi-Guod! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, density increases with decreasing volume, but ONLY IF THE MASS STAYS CONSTANT. I GUARANTEE the guy didn't get the same amount of mass into one millionth of the volume.

      Here are another few proportionality relations for you:

      Gravitational force increases with mass.

      Penetration resistance decreases with area.

      Area increases with the 2/3 power of volume.

      If he did increase density by 10^6, he wouldn't have been able to do any experiments on his crystals, as his sample would have punched a hole through his desk, the floor, his building's foundation, and would currently be sitting at the center of the earth.

      D

    4. Re:a million times desnser? by Manax · · Score: 1
      Which means that the crystals are a million times SMALLER, not denser.

      density = mass / volume

      Thus, if volume increases, density increases.

      If you had a cubic centimeter of the stuff, it would be very very heavy indeed, but it appears that the stuff is formed in sheets, thus very very thin.

      --
      "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
    5. Re:a million times desnser? by Manax · · Score: 1
      Doh, I really shoulda previewed....

      If volume decreases, density increases.

      --
      "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
    6. Re:a million times desnser? by pmc · · Score: 2
      1 million crystals in Gruen's diamond film can fit inside the crystal produced by conventional methods

      Which means that the crystals are a million times SMALLER, not denser.

      Well, a million times smaller by volume, but a hundred times smaller by linear measure, which is a more rational measure of this sort of thing. For example one of the things that is interesting for this sort of stuff is flatness, which is a (very crudely) related to the size (and size distribution) of the crystals.

      Of course "One hundred times..." doesn't sound as good as "one million times...".

  45. Yea, but by DBLO_P · · Score: 1

    when am I going to see my transmetta powered pda watch using this stuff.

  46. Here's a way to fix global warming by Shotgun · · Score: 4

    Use this process to coat the rings and cylinder wall for my trucks engine. While there at it, coat everything that rubs or has water running through it. With its low coefficient of friction, and long wear, the engine will double in horsepower, get twice the mileage and practically never wear out (with proper maintenance).

    The long life will mean that the most environmentally damaging the vehicles do in their lifespan (other than crushing small woodland critters), being made, will be done less often.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Here's a way to fix global warming by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      My car has a truck engine in it (I have an '89 240SX, which has the KA24E motor. It's the same as the Nissan pickup from the same year) and it DOES get twice the mileage. Well, maybe not twice, but I pick up 30 mpg freeway. No joke.

      Bzzt. Wrong. Thanks for playing. I owned an '85 Nissan Pickup up until just a few months ago. I got around 20mpg highway, even though the engine was so worn that it had gotten tight to the point that the starter wasn't strong enough to turn it over (had to assist the starter by popping the clutch on a downhill grade. A real bitch when it's raining.) So you get 50% more mpg from the same engine in a sleek, low-slung sports car than I get running it in a high-riding, blocky, 4x4 pickup. I'll give you that, but it doesn't negate my point that the same engine would have improve performance, wear longer an use less gas with harder/slicker bearings and rings. All you've said is that a small sports car requires less energy to push than a larger truck.

      You'd get a better increase in performance at a cheaper cost by just using buckyballs as lubricant.

      Bzzt. Wrong again. You have to periodically replace combustion engine oil, not because it is worn out as most people seem to think, but because it gets full of trash from the combustion process. Most modern oils would last for 20,000 miles in a contemporary engine, but since it's second calling is to carry soot and grit away from the rubbing parts , you have to replace it when it gets saturated. Synthetic oils are already very expensive. Who could afford to replace oil ever 3k to 7k miles with an exotic lubricant like buckyballs? You may get better performance, but you definitely won't get it cheaper unless you devise a manufacturing process less complicated than "1)pump crude out of the ground, 2)crack it, 3)put it in bottles."

      Also, where do you think cars go when you get rid of them? Someone else buys them. If they're totalled, they get crushed, and recycled, and made into - Yep, you guessed it - cars, among other things.

      I'm sure you have a point hidden in there somewhere. My point is that the car must eventually die. My wife's Volvo died two weeks ago (threw a rod). Yes, it'll be recycled, but the process of doing that is very energy intensive. Wouldn't it be better for the environment and her wallet if the car just worked for several more years.

      If you're really worried about using this technology to improve your environment, figure out some way to use it to improve battery life, so we can all drive electrics. While you're at it, figure out a way to use it to make high-power photovoltaic cells...

      How the hell would technology that improves the mechanical properties of sliding or rolling surfaces be used the improve the electrical characteristics of batteries or PV cells? Use the tech to coat the bearing of an electric car and it will get more miles on a charge, but that is about the only use and that would apply to any engine technology used. Coating the bearing in the power plants generator would drop the friction there, thus lowering emissions at the power plant.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Here's a way to fix global warming by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Bzzt. Wrong.
      ...
      All you've said is that a small sports car requires less energy to push than a larger truck.

      Yeah, and I was right. :P

      You'd get a better increase in performance at a cheaper cost by just using buckyballs as lubricant.

      Bzzt. Wrong again. You have to periodically replace combustion engine oil, not because it is worn out as most people seem to think, but because it gets full of trash from the combustion process. Most modern oils would last for 20,000 miles in a contemporary engine, but since it's second calling is to carry soot and grit away from the rubbing parts , you have to replace it when it gets saturated. Synthetic oils are already very expensive. Who could afford to replace oil ever 3k to 7k miles with an exotic lubricant like buckyballs? You may get better performance, but you definitely won't get it cheaper unless you devise a manufacturing process less complicated than "1)pump crude out of the ground, 2)crack it, 3)put it in bottles."

      Actually, buckyballs are pretty cheap to produce right now, and they're only going to get cheaper. The insane improvement in lubrication that you gain by using buckyballs means dramatically less wear to the engine - probably a greater increase than this coating - Which means less particulate matter ends up in the lubricant, which means, of course, that it does not have to be replaced as often.

      There are three reasons oil must be replaced in the real world. First, the reason you cite, which is that it becomes filled with particulate matter - tiny metal shavings, mostly, and the occasional combustion byproduct. Two, leakage, which we like to avoid even more when you use a more expensive lubricant. And three, all engines burn lubricant. This is a truism. Some burn quite a bit (mostly older vehicles) and some burn almost none at all, but they all lose some as part of the natural functioning.

      Also, where do you think cars go when you get rid of them? Someone else buys them. If they're totalled, they get crushed, and recycled, and made into - Yep, you guessed it - cars, among other things.

      I'm sure you have a point hidden in there somewhere. My point is that the car must eventually die. My wife's Volvo died two weeks ago (threw a rod). Yes, it'll be recycled, but the process of doing that is very energy intensive. Wouldn't it be better for the environment and her wallet if the car just worked for several more years.

      Yes, it certainly would be. I can't find fault with that statement. Of course, you could have helped out quite a bit by either replacing just the engine or the damaged parts of the engine. People frequently dispose of their cars when they are reparable because they don't want to do the work to repair them. I agree that it is often cheaper to replace a car than to repair it if someone else does the work, and I am not personally given to doing lots of work on my cars, myself. However, you could probably pick up an engine for that car in good shape for less than a thousand dollars, and find someone to install it for less than a thousand as well - Especially since all you need is the long block, because you presumably have all the smog and environmental equipment.

      How the hell would technology that improves the mechanical properties of sliding or rolling surfaces be used the improve the electrical characteristics of batteries or PV cells? Use the tech to coat the bearing of an electric car and it will get more miles on a charge, but that is about the only use and that would apply to any engine technology used. Coating the bearing in the power plants generator would drop the friction there, thus lowering emissions at the power plant.

      You just answered your own questions. Of course, you never know what else it might be good for. Maybe you could use substances not previously practical in a battery if you lined the canister with this material, or perhaps there are some other possible benefits. Maybe you could even make some sort of spiffy filter that would seperate the particulate waste from the exhaust of a power plant. It's a good question, and one I don't have any special answers for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. Re:A step closer... by drenehtsral · · Score: 2

    Actually a couple years ago, I was reading about somebody who wanted to coat the blades of various tools with some sort of vaccuum deposited diamond film (possibly this... I don't know too much about this process, the think i was reading also involved vaccuum chambers and heavy hydrogen and bombarding stuff with microwaves... didn't sound like too practical a process on an industrial scale).. That was in 93 or so, so it was probably something different... This sounds cool though =:-)

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  48. hmm by Hard_Code · · Score: 3

    Does anybody else hear that low T2 background music?...

    ...
    At the turn of the century, experimental quantum computers had been successfully demonstrated in scientific labs

    Bill Joy, founder and chief scientist of Sun Microsystems, writes an article warning against the potential dangers of ubiquitous nanotechnology

    In the year 2000 Argonne National Laboratory researchers develop a process for growing diamond film that promises to bring the superior mechanical, tribological, and thermal properties of diamond to the rapidly expanding field of micro- electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology.
    ...

    Dum-da-dum ta-dum
    Dum-da-dum ta-dum
    Dum da dum
    Dum-da-dum ta-dum
    Dum-da-dum ta-dum

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  49. And our Favorite frenchman.. by dolanh · · Score: 2

    Jules Verne predicted submarines and fax machines, among other things...

    1. Re:And our Favorite frenchman.. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Leonardo Da Vinci predicted the submarine by making a crude sketch of one in his notebooks.

  50. Diamond is also a semiconductor by argoff · · Score: 2
    diamond is in the same group on the perodic table as silicon, so there is no reason why it shouldn't also be a semiconductor. this would be good because diamond is 12x times more small than silicon atoms - thus giving us at least a 12x factor in speed increase.

    but diamond is also transparent, so I wander if it couldn't in some way for optical semiconducting. very exciting thought imho.

  51. Re:You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    Called sarcasm, maybe you've heard of it?

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  52. Re:Dark matter... by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

    ...each pound of which weighs over ten thousand pounds
    Uh... so a meter of dark matter would be how long exactly?

    --
    Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
    Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  53. With a name . . . by WilyHacker · · Score: 2

    . . . like ultrananocrystalline, it's gotta be good!

    appologies to Schmuckers.

    --
    Caffeine underflow (brain dumped)
  54. Possible Use by G.+Waters · · Score: 2

    If this film is transparent, wouldn't it be possible to use it as protective coating for teeth? If it's opaque, perhaps it could be used as a two-in-one cavity-stopper/teeth-whitener coating, assuming it could be artificially colored if it isn't naturally white.

    Anyone have any ideas for applications of this?

    -G. Waters
    "sigs cause cancer"

    1. Re:Possible Use by karnal · · Score: 2

      while that may be possible, I would have to wonder what would happen if it is a fully sealed tooth decay preventative device -- if the teeth need air from the outside, this could cause weird decay.

      --
      Karnal
  55. ********PRESS RELEASE*********** by 64.28.67.48 · · Score: 1

    ********PRESS RELEASE***********

    MicroMachines is proud to announce its most durable line of toy vehicles ever! Made of space-age Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Film, these little cars and trucks are virtually indestructible and now weigh as much as the full sized vehicle!

    CAUTION: Do not drop Ultrananocrystalline MicroMachines on your little brother's head. Placing Ultrananocrystalline MicroMachines on railroad tracks may cause derailment and death.

    -------------

    --

    -------------
    The truth is out th- oh, wait, here it is...
  56. micromachines by AssFace · · Score: 1

    they had those commercials where the dude would talk really fast. one of those made of diamond would be pretty sweet if you ask me.
    --------------------------------------------- -----

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  57. Stars on a map of London by Kevin+T. · · Score: 1

    But did [von Braun's rockets] hit any of the stars in London? They've always had good theater there. (Or would that be theatre?)

    Well, I've been told that the best way to analyze the distribution of rocket-bomb hits is to take a map of London and put a sticky star on the site of each hit, color coded for how you're feeling that day....

  58. Re:A step closer...or not by StarFace · · Score: 1
    I'm no scientist, but I can think of quite a few ways in which inert objects are bound together. It seems this new process will make it easier to fabricate a 'sheet' of diamond in place. So why not fashion the tip of the blade with a small groove that the diamond envelopes, and when it hardens it would cleave to the blade. The only way you could get it off would be to snap the blade.

    I don't know enough about the process to be certain, but the mechanics of the idea would work.

    --
    V
  59. Re:You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    >Think about it.

    Man, whatever you're smokin' today must be primo, eh?

    You know, you have a point though. Before the advent of mass-produced internal combustion engines, there wasn't nearly as much plant life on the planet. :-p

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  60. Re:What the hell is the "Diamond Age" about? by Khaotix · · Score: 1

    Neal Stephenson is one of the most brilliant writers I have had the pleasure of reading. The Diamond Age is becoming more and more possible as our technology advances. The advances in nanotechnology are leading towards being able to link different elements on the atomic level. If you haven't read any of Stephenson's books, go buy them now. Cryptonomicon is his latest and it deals with cryptography and crypto analysis. All of his work as proved very thought provoking for me. - Khaotix Brevis ipsa vita est sed malis fit longior - Publilus Syrus

  61. Re:Chinese in Stephenson's books by changeling · · Score: 1

    Assuming that you are referring to the General who started out life in the book as a Japanese prisoner digging a place to toss a planetary mass of gold, his name is Wing, and he is quite definitely Chinese.

  62. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    No, Heinlein had an imagination, unlike the current crop of anime-lovin' brain damaged "sci-fi" fans of today.

    He took issue with Conservative America's prudism, and apparently irks people to this day. Not bad for a octagenarian Naval officer.

  63. Re: T2 by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    Is Sun gonna change it's name to CyberDyne Systems?

    Don't worry, we can always sniff them out with dogs.

  64. You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    You probably didn't realize it, but wear and corrosion of automobile engines is one of the primary ways of adding iron (Fe) to the environment.

    Everyone needs iron, hence the One a Day plus iron adds, but unless a plant is growing in iron rich soil, like the oolitiic hemattite in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, it may not get enough iron. For your garden, you could just use fertilized, but you can't fertilize an entire environment.

    But when you drive, tiny iron fragments get scraped off your engine, out the exhaust pipe and into the atmostphere, provding iron to plants.

    Think about it.

    1. Re:You ignore the beneficial aspects of wear by ethereal · · Score: 1

      So how'd we get all of those plants, back before Henry Ford was born? Tell me another, Hairy!

      Seriously: if anything plants need Magnesium, which is a building block of chlorophyll. Also Nitrogen, Phosphorus, etc. Plant fertilizers don't even include iron.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  65. Re:A step closer...or not by tylerh · · Score: 2

    Ideas like this have been kicking around for years. The real problem isn't getting the carbon/diamond on the blade edge, it's keeping it there. Diamond is inert, so it doesn't like sticking to things, so it usually "rubs off" the substrate (metal, in your case) quickly.

    --
    "one treats others with courtesy not because they are gentlemen or gentlewomen, but because you are" --G. Henrichs
  66. Carbon not a good electronics substrate by crgrace · · Score: 1
    New electronics substrate (Carbon has same valence as Silicon).

    They already use carbon as an electronics substrate for cryogenic (VERY low temperature) electronics, 1 or 2 Kelvin type of stuff. Also, Silicon Carbide electronics are potentially useful for high power application. There is just no way , though, that Carbon will be used as a general-purpose substrate because:

    1. THE MAIN REASON: Silicon has an EXCELLENT oxide (SiO2) that makes field-effect transistors possible. These devices are the basis of the modern computer (that is post 1980) revolution because they are much smaller and use less power than biploar transistors and have in fact made that current crop of microprosessors possible. Without a high-quality native oxide, you don't have a field-effect transistor, so you don't have a leading-edge microprocessor. That's why you don't see Gallium Arsenide microprocessor in the 40 GHz range, because Gallium Arsenide doesn't have a good oxide.

    2. Electron mobility: Silicon is much faster than carbon.

    3. Ease of fabrication: Silicon is pretty much a miracle material when it comes to fabrication. It is self repairing when annealing in the furnance, is cheap to produce, and very easy to generate in single crystal form.

    There are more but Silicon is here to stay for a long, long, time.

  67. Re:I was tempted(Getting more OT by the minute) by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1

    Maybe now it will be possible to create quantum computers that are much more functional than the ones that currently exist.

    Not really. The problem with quantum computers is that essentially the computer is designed for a specific problem, since the physical structure of the computer IS the program. A diamond crystal may contain more atoms (and therefore more Qbits) but this doesn't necessarily make a more powerful computer, just like a heap of 1 billion transistors is not automatically more powerful than a P3, or even a 286 for that matter. It all depends on how they're wired together.

    I expect a really powerful quantum computer would look more like a dendrimer, but that's just my guess.

  68. Tiny spying machines. by vect0rx · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else get envision a perfectly normal looking fly or perhaps a spider. With nano cameras.. and a nano wireless tcp/ip stack .. transmitting your life to ? Would make for some cool voyeur www sites I spose.

  69. But.. by goodhell · · Score: 2

    His books suck!

    They have little plot. Underutilize characters that he sets up as main characters, overutilizes background characters. Follows no coherent pattern in the storyline.

    He may do his research, but I would wish to God (not Stephenson) that he would read the other God's book --Sol Stein's Stein on Writing. Maybe that would help him out.

    --I could go on like the energizer bunny, but my battery died.

    1. Re:But.. by ZZane · · Score: 1

      Did you ever read "The Difference Engine" (I believe that was the title)? I can't believe I actually finished that book. It rambled on and on and went NOWHERE. There was NO plot and hardly any real character development. I felt like I was trapped is some very odd, very boring dream that made no sense. Another piece of my life I will never get back.

      I did, however, like 'The Diamond Age' and 'Cryptonomicron'. Despite the fact that I liked it 'Cryptonomicron' suffered from some of the rambling and lack of plot that 'The Difference Engine' had. I especially despised the end of 'Cryptonomicron' and really hate it when he tries to mix mysticism in with his Sci-Fi. He's not good at it and it degrades his work. The arguments (or reasons) he use are usually very flimsy and try to hide a lack of purpose behind layers and layers of nonsensical philosophy.

      I loved Snow-Crash (again, minus the mysticism :).

      -Zane

      --
      This sig is worse than my last.
  70. They can be made cheaply - quote from ANL release by shermNOTsherm · · Score: 1

    "Ultrananocrystalline" diamond films are deposited by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method developed at Argonne and patterned by using photolithography and other techniques common in the semiconductor industry. The result is freestanding diamond structures as little as 300 nanometers (nm) thick with features as small as 100 nm and friction coefficients as low as 0.01.

  71. Re:They can be made cheaply - quote from ANL relea by crgrace · · Score: 1

    CVD cheap?!? You must not know that much about semiconductor manufacturing.

  72. Um, not at all. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    if volume [decreases], density increases.

    ...if the mass is being held constant, which it obviously isn't. The crystals are smaller because they contain a million times fewer atoms, not because they contain the same number of atoms packed a million times tighter.

    --------

    --
    /.
  73. Anybody got any better sources? by BlaisePascal · · Score: 1

    The Chicago Tribune article was light on the tech details. Anybody got anything meatier? Online Papers? The patent numbers covering the process? The homepage of the lab he's working at, or that of the MRS?

    I suppose I can get his patents by just knowing his name...I'll try that, and report back.

  74. It has nano in the title by Rupert · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this have been posted by Hemos?

    --

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  75. Gamma-Ray Lasers? by Vuarnet · · Score: 1

    I think the gamma ray laser project was one of the last SDI funded research projects in the 90's. I think they got the whole concept to work, but I'm not sure if it got developed further.

    Sadly, I think those research projects were left uncompleted due to the disappearence of Dr. Robert Bruce Banner, a pioneer in the research of Gamma Rays. I wonder what became of him?

    --
    Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
    Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Gamma-Ray Lasers? by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Didn't he have a tragic accident? Hell of a temper now huh?

  76. diifferent opinion by terpia · · Score: 1

    sorry but i still prefer crystal methamphetamine.
    (just my personal opinion)

    FUCK CAFEINE

    --
    .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
  77. Obvious to even the most simpleminded individual.. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    ...with advanced degrees in physics, chemistry, and hyperspace geometry. Froin-glaven!

    In all seriousness, obvious when you know what regular diamond crystals are like because the increased density version would involve collapsing the electron shells, which is frowned upon among civilized chemists (only those boorish astrophysicists would dare such an offense against the proper state of matter).

    --------

    --
    /.
  78. What the hell is the "Diamond Age" about? by sips · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it and I don't really see any significant use for diamonds in many things except for drills and rings what about titanium?

    --
    Respond to s
    1. Re:What the hell is the "Diamond Age" about? by esonik · · Score: 1

      Never heard of it and I don't really see any significant use for diamonds in many things except for drills and rings what about titanium?

      Diamond is sometimes used as window in infrared spectroscopy, because of it's high transmission in the far infrared regime (windows are needed to seperate the vacuum chamber from the spectrometer and detector). Unfortunately such windows cost about $5000 each (1 cm diameter).
  79. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by terpia · · Score: 1

    my last name truly IS HEINLEIN.
    and i will say that i am one preverse SOB.

    not only that, but my mother tells me that the surname HEINLEIN means chicken farmer or something. our family crest has a rooster on it. which further proves that i am nothing but a COCK. yeah, I know, BIG SURPRISE.

    BTW: no relation to the famous HEINLEIN.

    --
    .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
  80. Re:It's a book by Neil Stephenson by non · · Score: 1
    Did it occur to you that "some sort of shared ideal," in the case of the Neo-Victorians, happened to be engineering.

    So, while its true that nanotechnology won't morph americans into Neo-Victorians, its quite possible that the societies that are organized around engineering on that scale may come espouse the beliefs originally known as Victorianism.

    personally, i can't wait for corsets to come back into style

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
  81. And now for something completely different... by FashionTech · · Score: 1

    Technology isn't as esoteric as you can imagine. It is as esoteric as you can't imagine.

  82. Stein on Writing?? Pshaw! by ZZane · · Score: 1

    Dorf on Writing is MUCH MUCH better.

    --
    This sig is worse than my last.
  83. Not denser, just smaller by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    1 million times denser than conventional crystals.

    This is a mis-quote. What the article says is:

    "And 1 million crystals in Gruen's diamond
    film can fit inside the crystal produced by
    conventional methods."


    This states that the crystals are one millionth as massive, not that they have the same mass at a smaller size. This explains why the film material is so much smoother than previously manufactured materials: Smaller granularity.

    Mythological Beast

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  84. How about... by baywulf · · Score: 1

    "I think we need a new name for it. Perhaps "buckysheet" would do."

    How about "buck-naked?"

  85. Not just a diamond age, a Carbon age by Anopheles · · Score: 2
    "Maybe this will mark the real beginning of Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age."

    I'm a big fan of Neal Stephenson, but a bigger fan of Sir Arthur C Clarke. He should get some credit for predicting that we are entering (have entered?) a "Carbon Age". Diamond-based materials are going to be a minor material of the future, and will not be as important as the major advances in other carbon-based materials. We've already seen buckyballs and carbon-fiber... I don't think anybody will disagree that we're on the verge of some exciting times as far as Carbon is concerned...

    1. Re:Not just a diamond age, a Carbon age by Anopheles · · Score: 1
      "At that time, he theorized he could use those atoms, called "dimers," as the building blocks for diamond films."

      "Dimers" are fragmented buckyballs. 'nuff said.

  86. Re:ultracrystalline! by EssentialTremor · · Score: 1

    1 million times denser than conventional crystals
    You mean 1 million times smaller than conventional crystals They're actually less dense than real diamond!

  87. Re:A step closer... by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 1
    The real problem with this idea is that it doesn't work on a fundamental level. Most recursive fractal patterns are such that although a very small version of it would cut through something, it still wouldn't be as good as a straight edge.

    However, substances such as this which are durable and hard on a very small scale are potentially useful in the creation of blades with monomolecular edges, which would be quite good at cutting things apart.

  88. Dark matter... by plastik55 · · Score: 1

    ....each pound of which weighs over ten thousand pounds.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  89. 2001, Cyberpunk, And Other Useless Drek by d.valued · · Score: 1

    The Clarke reference is pretty good. In 3001, the last book of the four-part trilogy, major historic sites were coated in diamond to protect them from the harsh environment they happen to abide in.

    In "Shadowrun", they talk about long, bladed weapons coated with nanodiamond coats to keep a painfully sharp blade sharp without honing stones etc.

    I personally think that nanodiamond coats are the best way to reduce friction on spacecraft; the near-perfect surface thus created would probably be able to get closer to subphotonic speeds than anything else we've come up with to date.

    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.
  90. Re:A step closer... by photon317 · · Score: 1
    Why don't they work? It would seem to me that just about any fractal pattern (for example, the simple straightline triangle one), when recursed down like that on a blade, would give a many-many-fold increase in the "length" of blade edge running over a given object to be cut in a single pass.... I thought this was the advantage... a 5 inch knife blade that can cut as if a 50 foot blade was drug over something.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  91. Good one... by mholve · · Score: 1
    I like that one.

    Nanosheet? Crystalpage? Hmmm... UNCDF?

  92. I was tempted by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

    to make a beowulf reference, which I just did.
    Maybe now it will be possible to create quantum computers that are much more functional than the ones that currently exist.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
  93. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age (Heinlein???) by fluffhead · · Score: 2

    What a troll. Don't get me wrong, I love Heinlein, but if you read his later work (the Lazarus Long stuff especially), he gets a lot more perverted than just implied incest. Like a literal rendition (through time travel and paradoxes) of the comedy bluegrass ditty "I'm My Own Grandpaw".... I could go on, but I won't.

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak

    --

    #include "disclaim.h"
    "All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
  94. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by drivers · · Score: 1

    Go back and read the books again. Society in his book is split up into very different subcultures. I've heard him say in person (at a book reading) he doesn't think that people will be able to get together and act as one homogenous type of group.

  95. Here's info from Argonne National Lab by 64.28.67.48 · · Score: 3
    --

    -------------
    The truth is out th- oh, wait, here it is...
  96. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by thunder-in-pants · · Score: 1

    Heinlein chastised perverts? If I recall Stranger in a Strange Land and Glory Road correctly, Heinlein was quite perverse. Not to mention the one book where the guy's brain is put in his secretary's body. Heinlein had issues.

    --

    Listen, Sigmund, we'll discuss it in the morning.

  97. Doh! Difference Engine was Gibson by ZZane · · Score: 1


    Well I started thinking I might've gotten some Gibson mixed in there and it turns out 'The Difference Engine' was Gibson not Stephenson. Just thought they were the same because of the similar styles and the Victorian obsession those two seem to have. Oh well. My point about Stephenson's mysticism and 'The Difference Engine's suck still stands. :)

    -Zane

    --
    This sig is worse than my last.
  98. Fragmenting into smaller societies by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

    This is a process that is already occuring, in a modest way.

    Not only have we seen numerous "subculture" groups, essentially choosing a common identity at variance with the larger society around them, we also have such phenomena as ethnic and religious sectarianism, which have become much more important over just the past few decades.

    Another, more curious, version of this trend is the phenomenon of micronationalism. Micronationalism may seem freaky, but it does show the same general tendency to pick a "personal" path along with likeminded individuals.

    - Ravn

    --

    - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  99. Re:They can be made cheaply - quote from ANL relea by esonik · · Score: 1

    Compared to other techniques for producing diamond, CVD is probably cheap.

  100. Verne didn't have to predict subs or fax machines by iktos · · Score: 1
    He did?

    Submarines as such had been predicted long before him, and I seem to recall Hunley was used operationally just a year after Verne published his first novel (which wasn't about submarines).

    And unless I misremember, the first commercial fax service was disbanded in 1871 after six or seven years of operation (as it was uneconomical). Used pendulums to synchronise.

  101. Stop The Krull Invasion! by Cylix · · Score: 1

    Damn you man, don't you see the potential.

    These new crystaline nano-ma-jiggers can be used to create cryastaline shields. Perfect for our defense against the oncoming krull invasion force the Slashdot crew have been o so informative about.

    Anyhow, I am sure Nate and Hemos have been well into the development of the new shield technology.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  102. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by Killean · · Score: 1

    Um, actually, I believe Heinlein wrote a novel called _The Sixth Collumn_ where the scary Chinese invade America (of course we defeat them with technology disguised as religion)...

    --
    My new catch phrase is: "I NEED A NEW CATCH PHRASE, BABY!"
  103. Chinese in Stephenson's books by billstewart · · Score: 1
    • Mr. Lee, of Mr. Lee's Greater Hong Kong in Snow Crash is a positive figure.
    • Unless I'm misremembering, the scary Asian general in Cryptonomicon is Japanese, not Chinese. While most generals may be scary madmen (:-), WW2 Japan certainly had some.
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  104. Stephenson has to wait for Clark by GMontag · · Score: 2

    Maybe
    this will mark the real beginning of Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age."


    Well, maybe yes and maybe no. We have to wait until next year for the 2001: A Space Oddessy prediction to come true, then in 2010 Jupiter explodes and becomes a star.

    But wait, don't get too confused, at the end of 2033(isn't that the last of the trilogy?) we discover that DeBeers has been keeping all of the diamond matter a big secret.

    Anyway, we have to wait until we have enough diamond to build all the stuff Clark wrote about first and then Stephenson piled on.

    Visit DC2600

  105. Re:Shades of the Diamond Age by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

    That was quite a nice post until the last paragraph when you made it clear that you were a tr0ll.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
  106. hmmm... by Vorro · · Score: 5
    "This makes them a practical base material for micro machines..."

    What was wrong with good old die-cast metal?

    Besides, I don't really see how some useless upgrade to miniature cars actually affects science. After all, all Micro Machines are nowadays are a crappy standover of the 80's, somehow still alive today... though I'm glad we don't have to listen to that dude in the Micro Machines commercials talk at 300 kilometres per hour anymore...

    The Micro Machines Nintendo game was pretty fun, though... I enjoyed racing around on a pool table.

    Ah well.

    -Vorro
    ---------------------------
    A wise man speaks because he has something to say.
    A foolish man speaks because he has to say something.

    --
    ____________________________
    What did the Buddhist say to the hot dog vendor?

    "Make me one with everything."

  107. A step closer... by photon317 · · Score: 2
    Using the crystals he produces, I could see making a diamond fractal blade, ala Gibson. It wouldn't have infinite recursion, but it could recurse from an inches-long visible outer pattern down to the nano-scale of his crystals. It would be far sharper than any conventional blade.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  108. It's a book by Neil Stephenson by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    A science fiction book by Neil Stephenson about nano-tech and it's affect on society.

    He apparently believes with nano-tech, America would turn into a Neo-Victorian British-aping society who would proceed to economocially subjugate China.

    Sounds like Mr. Stephenson watched a few too many Merchant-Ivory films.