Microsoft's New Spamming Technique
judges1617 writes: "Microsoft is now testing a beta version of their MSN Explorer that sends e-mails to everyone in your Outlook Address, informing them that your e-mail address has changed and invites them to to try MSN. Even the people who use MSN are complaining, but M$ refuses to acknowledge it is doing anything wrong. Read the whole story here" The best part of this article is the MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you
received was an
invitation from MSN
Explorer, sent on
behalf of an existing
user who changed their
e-mail address and
wants you to try MSN
Explorer." I guess we can add "Spamming" as another "Business" where Microsoft can use its monopoly status to its
advantage.
Really, if you can't memorize the email addresses of the hundred or so people and mailing lists with whom you regularly correspond, you shouldn't be using a computer.
Criminy, what next, complaining about Explorer's bookmark files? Really, if you can't memorize the thousand or so web addies your regularly surf to, you shouldn't be on the web.
Chapter U: It's not wrong if we do it. Chapter V: If it is indeed wrong, litigate, litigate and obfiscate then litigate some more.
BOSTON SUCKS!
I mean if you can be busted for writing Melissa, (which behaves in an identical manner) why not for this?
John
I have several email accounts, for different reasons. If they all spontaneously decided to tell everyone to use one account, where would I be?
/option/, but as the default it does seem a bit weird.
I don't see why this shouldn't be an
-
Meep meep
Jeez...this article is more about clueless newbies sending spam...the product specifically asks if you want to email ALL of your email contacts. Maybe a lot of people just didn't bother to read the message. The implementation is clearly bad, but that doesn't make the idea (allowing people who have just changed their address to send a mail to everyone they email regularly) bad.
Ok, so MS assumes that anyone who changes their Email addy wants all of their friends to try MSN Explorer, right?
Sure, that makes sense to me. I think I'll assume that anyone who visits my web site wants all of their friends to visit my website. Lesse, where did I put that virus kit...
Mythological Beast
Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
Sounds to me like MS has put the techniques used by the ILOVEYOU virus to use in 'protecting consumers' from having bad (read: non-MS controlled) email services...
Hmm... freaky. What I want to know, is *how* did they do this, technically? Can other spammers use this same technique as well, or is it a Microsoft-only hidden technique? Because if it is, thats monopolistic.
Everyone should be able to use all the MS Outlook users out there to send spam, you know... not just Microsoft!
; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
...but I always thought that sending updates of e-mail addresses should be done by the person changing their account.
And while you can 'opt out', wouldn't it be better if the system popped up one of those annoying MS dialogs asking if you want everyone to be informed?
Or even better, allows you to pick and choose who you want informed, and allow you to enter your own text informing them, with the MS 'standard' being one of the options...
Or does that make too much sense?
NecroPuppy
---
This Monday is up to three days... And still going strong...
I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
Apple: has some home operating system market.
M$: monopolizes with its bosom buddy Intel. Boring hardware.
Apple: can't monopolize to save its life. Funky, powerful hardware.
M$: spams their users.
Apple: sues anyone trying to tell their users about new Apple stuff.
Sigh. It's stuff like this that makes me want to load up QNX and just hide in my basement...
Mr. Ska
These messages obviously are not spam. In the article, it clearly states that Hotmail, a completely free and useful service who protects your password and e-mail fervently, refuses to mark this as spam! Since Hotmail is the best web-based client around for free e-mail addresses, I would think that it would have the best filtering programs to weed out unwanted e-mails from unsolicited sources. Since the infalable Hotmail does not mark this as spam, saying "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer..." then clearly this was meant to be a beneficial and desired e-mail. Naysayers, begone! Hotmail would never lie to you!
------
"I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer. With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive e-mail, exchange instant messages with me and the millions of other people who use MSN Explorer, browse the Web and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new look for using the Web and makes it easy to find and play music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE! Just click on the link below and follow the download instructions.
This reads like spam to me. I wonder how many people are actually fooled to thinking that this was really a letter from a friend raving about this new product.
What gets me is that this seems so low for microsft to stoop. I mean, underhanded buisness maneuvers are at least somthing that requires brains... spam is something that dumbasses trying to make a buck off the web resort too.
Just another example of lock-in techniques from the monopolist. I get an offer for a free month of MSN, so I say, "Heh, it's free. Let's see why everyone trashes MSN so much." I install it, then everyone get a notice to change how they reach me.
Once I discover why everyone has been dissing the service, I have to either manually inform everyone that the previous message was bogus spam generated by MS crapware, that I was only testing out their service to see how bad it was, that it was so bad that I'll never use it again and that they should send emails to my real address, or I keep the service since that is how everyone knows how to reach me.
It's a testament to my cynicism that I believe most people would opt for the second choice.
Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
I don't know what you guys are talking about...Mine seems to work fine...
---
"I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer. With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive e-mail, exchange instant messages with me and the millions of other people who use MSN Explorer, browse the Web and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new look for using the Web and makes it easy to find and play music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE! Just click on the link below and follow the download instructions."
--
Spindletop Blackbird, the GNU/Linux Cube.
It's just that simple. It appears that Microsoft construes the defeat of fast-track to be a victory, and an endorsement of their business techniques.
Look for more of this type of conduct.
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
IMO, if you go through a few clicks and see something as blatant as that, you shouldn't click "OK" and complain about it afterward.
- I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.
This is an automatic message from the new Windows Messaging software information you that _Bob Sagertion_ has change his desktop wall paper quickly and easily with only 2 clicks of the mouse. That sure is easy, please try using Microsoft Windows 98 with imbedded Windows Messaging Software to allow YOU to take advantage of this great new fearture.
This email would also like to information you that _Bob Sagertion_ has not only moved his mouse, but has also used 2 clicks in the last _12_ seconds. How do you know so much information about _Bob Sagertion_ ? With the new Microsoft Mouse Monitor Util imbeded with Microsoft's own Windows Messaging. If you would like these great feartures YOU TO can get Windows Messaging for the low price of $19.95.
The next time _Bob Sagertion_ has made any changes or has interacted with a peice of Microsoft's Windows Messaging software, you will receive notice of this. If you would like YOUR freind to take notice of any IMPORTANT things you do with your computer, like change email address, store your persoal private journal or even make a mouse click, then please check out Microsoft's Windows Message software for the low price of $19.95
--
Also on a side note, Microsoft is suing Norton Anti-virus software for detecting and delete any messages Windows Messager is sending out. Due to the lack of AI in Norton's software, it can't tell the differant between this GREAT NEW SOFTWARE and the hoard of outlook worms/virii out there.
On a related topic, Mr. Norton knew caps has been shattered by an unknown person(s).
Have a nice day,
Windows Messaging software and Paper clip harry
"`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."
*sigh*
Could Microsoft possibly be more clueless? That's one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever heard.
IANAL, but couldn't the MS assumption that a given user 'wants' the people in their address book to try MS be considered false advertising?
I mean, couldn't it be considered fraud or something???
NecroPuppy
I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
It is distasteful, but it's not a Microsoft only thing.
License: By reading this you are agreeing that you agree with me.
> Wow, what great innovation!
Moral of the story: Always patent your virus algorithm, so if you get hit by a stiff fine you can pay it off by the proceeds from your IP!
--
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Some people are overracting on this. The problem here isn't necessarily that people are unknowingly spamming people with e-mail(although it will happen because people often don't read what they click too). Its the fact that Microsoft has now "innovated" there way into Unsolicited E-mail. It would have been just as bad if Bill Gates they bought one of those CD sets full of e-mail and started to spam people to try their software.
You think this is bad, you should see what else they have on the way:
Internet Explorer: Automatically posts to slashdot announcing that you are now using Internet Explorer and that we will all be assimilated.
MS Word: Prints a letter and envelope, complete with Estamps, to everyone in your address book, then uses Orbital Mind Control Lasers to make you sign, seal and send them. MS charges the estamps to your credit card.
MS Money: An 'affiliate' program. They send spam announcing that you use MS Money, then offer five bucks to people who switch, also. The money comes from your bank account. (After all, they didn't get this rich writing big checks. Buy 'em out, boys!)
You lose some friends who now think your a MS sellout, spammer or worse
Your email address will end up ORBS, RBL and several other blacklists, which means your (brand new!) email address is now useless
Several of you friends will succumb to the suggestion, try MSN explorer and fsck themselves up too; hating you twice as much.
I nominate this one for the stupid crocky losing misfeature award of the year.
---
This reminds me of Microsoft's response when I pointed out a problem with one of their C++ libraries: "It isn't a bug. It's a limitation." That slogan was my .sig for years.
"If I have seen further than other men, it is by stepping on their glasses." - Michael Swaine
MS Tech Support: Why do you think that?
Human: It e-mailed everyone in my Outlook address book, telling them I had a new e-mail and to try MSN.
MS Tech Support: Oh, that's not a virus, it's a feature.
Human: It's a feature of the OS to auto e-mail your friends?
MS Tech Support: That's correct.
Human: So the programs like "The Love Bug" are a feature of Windows.
MS Tech Support: No, they are virii.
Human: But doesn't this "feature" make the OS more likely to spread virii?
MS Tech Support: Virii spread is not a result of bad programming on MS's part, but because the user did something wrong.
Human: Things like this don't happen on my Mac or Linux bo...
MS Tech Support: *hangs up abruptly*
So there we have it folks, when MS spams your friends, its a feature, when a virii does it, its the users fault.
Burn Hollywood Burn
I can imagine the same feeling of "just do it already" takes over here too. How many times do you have to click OK to do this? After digging deep enough to change that address, I can imagine the average user is already annoyed. Next they get a promissing note, "Wow, now I don't have to do this by hand." By the time they get to that subject line and don't see anyway to change it, and don't know that the message contains something that WAS NOT prommised... well, they push the button.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
The problem is that microsoft did to things wrong. They worded thier ad to strong also they
They did not give people the choice to change it if they wanted to.
Linux is free, in the same way that picking up a recipe leaflet in a supermarket is free. If you start assuming time is a cost, then nothing is free and virtually every company in the world will be open to lawsuits.
When someone prints a recipe leaflet, it costs them money. The cost of Linux is borne by the developers that chose to donate their time.
The cost of spam is borne by several people: the moron who runs an open relay, the owners of routers and gateways en route, the bandwidth, and the disk space the victim's mail server uses to store the message. All the spammer needs to do is send 1 message with the victims in the BCC: field. They pay little of the actual cost, if any---some spam from free trial accounts at their ISP.
So the point is that some commmunications are banned because of who pays. Junk faxes operate on the same principle as spam; the receiver pays for the toner and paper, and the sender only pays for the fax line. Junk snail mail and telephone salespeople are fine (legally) because the sender pays for the printing and postage or the long-distance call.
___ CmdrTHAC0 ___
__CmdrTHAC0__
In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
As I see it, the problem here is that the software is encouraging the ignorant to violate internet ethics. The end-user should get what they deserve, which is possible termination of their internet connection for spamming. I encourage everyone to report anyone using this feature to their ISP. But this is not the true problem here. While "my friend" might have technically sent me an unsolicited email, the message (i.e. content) is from Microsoft; given that the user cannot alter the message. It is a very slick twist on viral marketing which I find extremely distasteful. Where are all these Chief Privacy Officers I keep hearing about? Self-regulation at work.
--
With features like this, who needs bugs?
I'm surprised that no one mentioned this yet, but it reminds me of the MCI Friends and Family fiasco. Remember that one? People signed up for cheap long distance to certain numbers, but MCI conveniently neglected to mention that they would call each of these people at dinner time and say "well, your friend so-and-so gave us your number and said that you should switch to MCI".
My extended family has boycotted MCI ever since. Too bad none of us use MSN right now -- we can't get indignant and drop their service.
Any excuse to bash MS, huh?
First off, the users who are complaining already hit a button that said it was going to do this. It's not like it did it automatically, the user had to take action for this to take place.
Secondly, why complain about this, and why now? How is this different from "Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://hotmail.com" or "Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com" that is at the bottom of every message sent from Hotmail, or the ad that Deja inserts at the bottom of every newsgroup post? Shouldn't you have been complaining about that before this?
When was the last time you tried to upgrade that woderful hardware you wierdo?
Last month. Processor upgrade. Worked fine.
Three months ago, another 128 megs RAM. Worked fine.
Before that, new internal hard drive. Worked fine.
Earlier still, another 64. Still worked fine.
Then of course there were the video and TV cards I added (I now run a two-headed Mac, thank you very much). All of it worked fine. Oh, and there's the external hard drives and CD burner.
Next on the list: a USB/FireWire combined card. If the other upgrades are any indication at all, it'll work fine.
I hope you enjoyed being reemed up the ass for the price since apple has a monopoly on its hardware.
Which is precisely why the only hardware I buy from Apple is the original system itself. The video/TV cards, the RAM, the drives, the burner, and processor upgrade... none of them are from Apple. Apple does overcharge for peripherals (have you seen the ungodly prices they're charging for the RAM upgrades they just started offering?) but the CPU's are more than worth every last penny.
Ever owned a Mac? I thought not. Very, very few people who call Macs overpriced ever have. All I can say is, own one and you'll understand.
----------
Stop it! Stop sending the spam! Spamming is the one thing the Knights who LART spammers can not stand!
[one of the knights gets a new msn address]
Ah! I spammed us! Quick change our email address! Agh!! I spammed us again! Agh, ogh, egh [rolls around on the floor in agony]
Steven
-- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
C:\Program Files\MSN\MSNCoreFiles
(And do your self a favor and make get rid of it's hidden option)
There you will find a few .mar files. Don't be fooled, they are not short cuts to access databases as your windows may believe. Open em up in wordpad and take a looke. There is some junk in images and such, but there is also alot of VB. I wonder if the send program is in there?
C:\Program Files\MSN\MSNCoreFiles\ui.mar
Do a search for 'recently'. It will take you to the message. Go ahead and edit it in wordpad to give yourself any email spam you would like to give.
My personal favorite is : Security through obscurity and bad press doesn't work very well. If I could do this, pray you have your VB scripting turned off.
This is an automatic message from Windows Messaging to let you know that _Bob Sagertion_ was able to access his favorite web site, _http://hotdudesinaction.com_, in only click with hot new version of Windows ME!
Windows Messaging thinks you would also like to know that _Bob Sagertion_ is available at MSN Instant Messaging address _hungry-for-c*ck_ at this very instant!
You can join _Bob Sagertion_ at _http://hotdudesinaction.com_, or his instant message handle _hungry-for-c*ck_, by downloading your FREE trial version of MSN at the address below. (Or you can join his wife, _Sue Sagertion_, as she searches for _Salt Lake City Divorce Lawyers_.) Remember, with Windows Messaging you are sure your friends can always join you at your favorite sites!
<i>Bob always thought that the 'paperclip' seemed a little <b>bent</b></i>
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
It appears that the new ICQ 2000b uses a tactic similar to Microsoft's, where users on your contact list are by default are sent an e-mail from you to log back on to ICQ after 30 days of not being online. While this isn't nearly as intrusive as MSN's browser's feature, it still is sending messages by default without the user's knowledge (unless they look at their preferences).
Yet more useless and annoying "features" added to ICQ's new releases after AOL's purchase of Mirabilis...
- Slash
> Your email address will end up ORBS, RBL and several other blacklists, which means your (brand new!) email address is
> now useless
No, IIRC, RBL applies to the domain, not the account on the domain. (A site gets black holed if it consistently proves itself unwilling to kick spammers & other abuse-types off of it's system.)
In other words, msn.com will get RBLed. AGAIN. After they made the minimum feeble attempts to crawl out of that space.
It's amazing that a company which prides itself for attracting so many ``smart people" has so many marketroids that get it in repeated trouble over so many issues that a couple minutes of applied commonsense would avoid.
Geoff
I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
I have clicked "no" on Microsoft's web site when I signed up for a minor download.
Ever since then, I receive constant updates from Microsoft's "Freedom to Innovate Network".
Unsubscribing did not help. Complaining to my local customer support of Microsoft Germany did not help (Several German MS employees asked "What is the Freedom to Innovate Network? I never heard of that.") Complaining to the US customer support did not help. Complaining to their US internet provider did not help.
Now don't tell me about "clicking no the for the love god" when it comes about a company that is too big to even care about me wanting their PR spin or not.
------------------
------------------
You may like my a cappella music