Slashdot Mirror
U.S. Significantly Lowers Export Limitations
nevets writes: "The White house has announced yesterday that it will significantly change the export limitations on computers. Because of the increasingly availability of computers and clustering capabilities, the U.S. has decided that it can't keep up their policies with the changing technology. The export limitations are going from a four tier system to a three tier, with tier 1 and 2 merging, tier 3 changing, but tier 4 will stay the same." While the new rules still base their country-by-country distinctions on the basis of how many millions of theoretical operations per second (MTOPS) a computer can do, they do seem slightly saner. wiredog points out this story at The Washington Post as well.
Hopefully, these reductions will be enough to spark the tepid computer market. It is becoming more difficult to sell computers in the U.S. as saturation increases.
To those who are worried about this technology falling into the wrong hands, remember, information and education are the enemies of despotism and the cornerstones of freedom. Encouraging the spread of information will increase the demand for Democracy worldwide.
Like this one? :)
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/134
Sounds like when I returned from .ca last year (after honeymoon).
"Do you have any illegal weapons?"
"Do you have any illegal drugs?"
Duh.
It's probably to allow for an additional charge (lying to an immigration officer or some such crap) during a possible prosecution.
Of course I answered truthfully. Only a moron would screw around with these people. Like a story I read in a motorcycle magazine: guy wanted a Canada only bike to bring into the US. He was a smart ass at customs, and got to wait another day because some of his paperwork wasn't in order. My guess is that if he had been pleasant and not flippant, he had a good chance at going through, even if he didn't dot all his 'i's and cross all his 't's.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
The thing I do not understand is this: Has the U.S. defence system get so much better that the dangerous bomb of yesteryear is no threat today?
If (say) Southern Swahililand could have developed a serious weapon last year with last years computers, how come today this is not worth worrying about, but a theoretical possibility of developing double as big bomb is?
if anyone wanted to take out Washington DC, they'd just ship in an old-fashioned bomb in a container. If anyone wanted to defend against an US invasion, they'd just bury the same old-fashioned bomb in the ground, retreat, and let it detonate when US troops were over it. No high-tech required! To rephrase: What is USA afraid of? There has been enough serious weapons to worry about for at least 30 years. So far none have been used against USA or its allies.
In Murphy We Turst
It's nice to see some non-braindamage regulations emerging from Washington for once. Don't get used to it, tho. If nothing else, this indicates that the government realizes that the economy of the last several years has been driven largely in part by technology purchases. Now that the primary growth market for server/highended workstations is going to be overseas, we can look for computer hardware companies to start competing on component and upgrade prices in the U.S. and Canada rather than trying to sell sub $500 PC's. I can't wait!
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
Absolutely agree.
.. the US grabbing and clutching, hording and not playing nice when most of the hardware is available outside the US, and most of the software /could/ be built outside the US.
.. the longer they treat the 'kid bullies' of the world like kids, the longer those 'kid bully' countries will stay kids. It's that holier than thou attitude .. ie, "We can act responsibly with our terribly dangerous super-computing powers and weapons (cha'right), but the rest of the world can't. Well, except for Canada, but thats only cause we could kick their ass in a microsecond if they ever started to misbehave."
It's the same old joke
I'll never understand the mentality
Just the opinions of lone Canadian, who's seen red (tape) for way to much of his existance.
If something has never been said/seen/heard before, best stop to think about why that is.
"Old man yells at systemd"
I.E. it may fsck with the Beowulf cluster sales... because now, since they are all strung together, they may be fast enought to fall under export controls.
so ... this could be a blow to upstart beowulf companies that want to expand into shipping overseas.
i dont know... it seems like the govt. is actually becoming MORE restrictive here... whilst saying that they are easing controls...
tagline
... hi bingo
In the ZDNET article about these restrictions was this absolutely hilarious paragraph:
However, Iraq already has figured out how to get around the restrictions. Followers of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein reportedly bought 1,400 PlayStation 2 units last year with the intent of developing a military system with the chips they contain. The gaming machines aren't subject to the same export rules as computers.
I'd think they're more interested in unlocking Kasumi's costumes than flying some ramshackle Emotion-engine missiles around.
o/~ Join us now and share the software
So that's government-speak for "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!"
why we've had any restrictions at all. It's like export restrictions on crypto (which is just NSA propaganda to make us think they're weaker than they really are...) -- utterly uselss in reality.
I mean, all the hardware in my computer seems to be manufactured outside the US anyway, and very little is even assembled here, let alone manufactured. If a malcontent really wanted the teraflops, would they really have to get it from the US?
the restrictions will soon be found to be useless. can anyone else see it:
foreign dictators hire some programmers to make terror@home the distributed computing project. people download the terror@home client and crunch numbers for leaders of terrorist states. 10 lucky participants are selected monthly and sent samples of biological and chemical weapons to use at their own discression along with a gift certificate to best buy where they can pick up another computer that can run the terror@home client.
use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that
-- john
...who saw that the White House link went to a directory called "hot_releases" and immediately formed a mental image of something called "Washington's Wildest Interns"?
"Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]ds Xx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
Seriously, though, is it?
Alex Bischoff
---
Alex Bischoff
HTML/CSS coder for hire
I'm an exchange student from australia in .ca now, and I tried to buy a computer from a large online retailer with a credit card with a postal address in Australia. A few hours later I get a phone call. Because I don't live in North America (even though the computer was being delivered to an address in Canada), I had to go through a whole set of export control questions: "Do you intend to use this device for nuclear or biological warfare?", "Do you intend to manufacture chemical weapons with this computer?", etc etc. The person on the other end was very appologetic about it, but still...
I didn't ask him if anyone ever said yes to those questions.
Political motivation is all about not having what the other guy has and doing what you can to even the playing feild. If you cannot you have to make due with what you have availiable to you. .gov insists no monkey business went on over there. My guess is there might be a big coverup going on in regards to the export too.
.gov wants something in return) I could see that country becoming the next malaysia, a middle eastern version of silicon valley.
h tm#obstruction . It basically sums up all of the american goverment motivations.
Case in point in regards to the middle eastern countries. Do we really know whats going on over there? Has anyone here actually been to iraq? How do we know this whole deal with suddam hussain isn't just another attempt at the goverment trying to get political support from the people when we go to war?
Ok so let me bring you to my point. It is possible that saddam would use these machines to build weapons and make big boom things blow up. It could also be possible he just wants them for geological calculations on his oil fields and our goverment is trying to hide the truth. Think about all our veterans that returned with gulf war syndrome. Headaches, nausia, arthritis all over, yet the
Maybe he just wants to surf the web, who knows? Anyone remember General Kadaffi? He was Suddam Hussain before there was a Suddam Hussain. Yet in the last 10 years he has been rebuilding his country, bringing water to the desert, giving land to his people, medical and welfare programs which have greatly improved conditions.
I think there is something Hussain has that the goverment wants. It could be oil, could be plutonium deposits, could be camels for all I know. Point is they're starving the country to death by putting all these trade restrictions and embargo's on them. This article made me think back to another article a few weeks back about atari800 computers still being used in russia for heart monitoring. I would imagine most of the middle eastern countries are worse off because they purchased most of what they have from the old USSR. I think it is inhumane to deny another human the absolute best in medical technology.
By lifting the ban on exporting powerfull computers it would open up a world of new possibilities for them. If we lifted all the bans there would be nothing to fight about at all (unless like I said,
In retrospect, I can allmost understand why Iraq hates us so much. We've blocked the import of more than just computers, between the US and the UN we've managed to block food, medicine, clothing, just about anything you can think of.
I'd suggest everyone check out the food-for-oil stuff here http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/nea/iraq/iraq99.
--toqer
And there I was, afraid that if I got the new portable, I wouldn't be able to take it with me whenever I travel.
Hmmm...now I just have to con my work into buying it for me.
Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
I have a feeling the software export restrictions were not instated to keep the kind of software Egghead sells from leaving American soil. I mean, who really cares if some fascist dictator gets his filthy hands on The Sims, Word Perfect, or Clean Sweep 2000? That's right, nobody. A very jingoistic individual might make a case for Quake 3 and the like ("They might learn advanced battle tactics!"), but... c'mon.
These restrictions are as far as I can tell focused on the kinds of software that you can't buy in the store. As the parent post pointed out: snooping software, high-level encryption, and weapon-focused CAD (a stretch). The kind of stuff that's sold by contract, is usually highly customized and proprietary, and remains in use by organizations for more than 15 years.
I suppose one could make a case with browsers, what with built-in encryption and what-not. I guess my point stands, because you can't buy that crap in stores anymore. :)
Not that I can think of a better one right now.
/bin/bash yet...
We all know that if you take enough low-powered machines, of the sort that anyone can get hold of, such as low-end pentiums, even 486's, etc. and stick them in a big enough warehouse, you can build machines that will out-compute any commercially available off-the-shelf single supercomputer. You only have to look at the Stone SouperComputer to see what is possible.
Hopefully, Saddam hasn't got the hang of
Costs to companies should go lower, because now they won't have to deal with all the limits on both marketing and distribution. They should also be able to reach a broader market. Good news all around.
-Moondog
During the cold war we had "1st world", "2nd world", and "3rd world" countries. First-world ones were western-style democracies like ours that fought on our side. Second-world ones were communist countries like the USSR and the eastern "bloc", who opposed us. And third-world countries were the countries not immediately involved in the conflict, like in South America.
Today, communism is completely gone from the world stage, and the old "$ord world" classification is obsolete. But the information age is upon us and is now defining our new political and social interactions in a global sense. I propose that we update our vocabularies with this new tiered classification which is rooted in the very machines that will drive our new economies. For future generations, it'll be much more important to know whether countries have or had access to the latest and greatest imports from the US technology giants than whether they had a particular stance on a silly thing like communism.
Read the rest of this comment...
But how does this affect Apple's "supercomputer" advertising taglines?
[
Seems to me that H1B visas would expose more foreign software developers to the "Advanced Techniques" that the government seems to think that this country has. Controlling the software in question without controlling the flow of the software developers wouldn't buy you a whole lot.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Well, software exports are much harder to control (border guards can't randomly inspect large shipments, because the large shipments could easily be encrypted. And you only need to get one shipment through, and then potentially everyone has a copy). So how long until they decide that this software-control thing won't work (unless maybe if they install back doors into the most powerful software).
--
Yup, that's the arrogant part of the equation. The risk is that we'll fall behind the rest of the world as more and more software is developed in countries without such laws.
BTW, a user submitted this story to Poliglut yesterday, so politically minded folks might be intersested in stopping by and seeing our other stuff.
--
With the whitehouse (executive branch) announcing this has been done is pure obfuscation. Its taking credit for actions done by another branch of government. Thats like claiming the executive branch is solely responsible for all economics. Oh wait! It already does even though the executive branch's only economic power is to request funds from Congress. Oh well...
I'm sure the details will show I'm all wrong (they usually do), but this seems like a covert Linux story. Why?
The market for very expensive supercomputers is limited to those organizations and countries with the money to buy them.
Seems to me that companies wanting to spread newly legal high-power computing around could do well by constructing machines with clustered/SMP'd off-the-shelf parts and little or no R&D $$ Linux (Beowulf?).
Gosh -- what might Compaq do with Alphas?
I would expect things to be broken down even more -- into 1 tier with exceptions.
I work at a microchip distributor, and we currently ship to countries all over the world. I think that the software export controls will become similar to those of what I see in electronic components. Most parts can be found anywhere in the world and, for the most part, US customs doesnt do much in the way of controlling their export (you may not agree if you are the one filling out the paperwork, but you know what I mean :) There are then parts that are restricted based upon various reasons, some being the country into which they are being shipped, the particular company purchasing, the end use of the product, and of course the product itself.
Believe me, there are hundreds of pages sent each month about companies that are known in various countries to do business with others, and it is our responsiblity to know that we can no longer ship product X to company Y.
Specifics aside, I think it is a good thing finally that the government is realizing that they need a different way of doing things, because the old ways just simply didnt work.
The ivory tower has never had to reach so h
What's the point of export restrictions now? Saddam Hussein already has all of the Playstation2's. All we can do now is sit back and wait for doomsday...
They may be out to prevent {en,de}cryption problems or something, but if you can't design a workable nuke with the discarded CPU boards that some of us geeks now have in storage, you shouldn't be in the business.
`ø,,ø!
Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
It kind of pisses me off that this is one of a few instances where the government realizes that a law as it stands is ineffective, and the reason they suddenly "got it" this time is because the hardware industry put monetary and political pressure on them. Eventually, the software industry may do the same. But for porn filtering in schools, there's no large economic pressure, so they may continue to be blissfully ignorant that the legislation is little more than an annoyance, yet is a bad legal precident.
--
Interesting that Israel falls under tier 3, but Intel owns a plant there. Doesn't this screw up the restrictions if an American company abroad can exceed the limitations of T3, but the products aren't actually imported to the US?
Anybody know what the export distinction is in this case?
---
https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
Ah France, just because the world needed someone to make US internet policy decisions look good.
_____________
I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
because this administration had no problem with easing export restrictions on "super" computers just a few years ago.
Big ass Crays, VMS, RS 6000s, hey no problemo! But don't export too many deskpros!
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
You are obviously a troll, so I really shouldn't reply, but here goes...
The U.S. computer market is rapidly saturating. It is always more difficult to sell an upgrade than it is to sell to a new user. Computer manufacturers need to be able to sell there wares throughout the world to countries that are less technologically developed in order to stay in business.
Draconian restrictions on computer exports will not stop international criminals from getting their hands on the technology, but it will serve to cripple U.S. computer manufacturers.
I understand this as a practical matter, but I wonder whether the US is the only country that has such software. It seems unlikely, and, while I understand that they feel they have to do what they can to preserve national security, other countries can still sell, distribute, or develop such software in the future. Still, this is good for all of those countries that need powerful computers and don't have the expertise or resources to develop them on their own.