Slashdot Mirror


World's Greatest Gamers, Unite

SamMichaels writes "Zophar's Domain had news of a press release from Twin Galaxies, the people who've tracked the high scores in games since 1981 (got famous in 82). They're looking for the top gamers to be published in a special commemorative edition of Twin Galaxies' "Official Video Game & Pinball Book Of World Records", which is the industry's official record book. The search is for gamers of "every game, every genre and every platform, whether old or new"."

27 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. emulation w/o representation :) by rfsayre · · Score: 3
    Does anyone know how they deal with emulators, differences in platform, etc.?

    Besides the obvious possibility of using capabilities like flash saves to get high scores, how do they determine if a player has used technology in an unfair (unjust?) way?

    If you set the world record for a game on a MAME cabinet, does it count?

    What if you set the record for a Nintendo game using the "Advantage"?

    It reminds of that scene in The Wizard where the Lucas character had a power glove...

  2. Reminds me of an old Little House on the Prarie by Ergo2000 · · Score: 2

    My wife watches that show okay? I promise it wasn't me.

    Anyways the episode is one where Grandpa's memoires are sent away to the big publishing company and what do you know : They want to make a book out of it! Just send us $XYZ thank you. Of course the scam was that to cater to his egotism/narcicism and a feeling that people really gave a crap (which they really don't) they'd get him to pay for the "first publishing" which of course would be the last.

    Who, except for the people who are in such a book, would buy such a book? I highly doubt anyone...

    1. Re:Reminds me of an old Little House on the Prarie by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2

      The same people who buy books like the Guinness Book of World Records. Just because you're not in the book doesn't mean you wouldn't find it interesting.

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
  3. Repetitive redundancy by Enoch+Root · · Score: 3
    [...] "Official Video Game & Pinball Book Of World Records", which is the industry's official record book.

    No kidding? Are they world records?

  4. Re:Atari 2600 Circus by Claudius · · Score: 2

    My brother and I used to switch off on that Atari 2600 great, Megamania (by Activision)--a game played by about three fewer people than Circus. Our record is three and a half hours on one game. We taped the joystick button down so that our hands wouldn't cramp up so badly from playing.

    This should at least win an honorable mention for pathetic wastes of time. Speaking of which, does anyone remember the deal Activision used to have for their Atari 2600 games where, if you achieved a threshold score, you could take a picture of the television and send it in to get a free patch or badge or something identifying you as "Grand Master of Megamania" or somesuch? Those were so cool.

  5. Tetris scores by boarder · · Score: 2
    I am quite the avid Tetris player (and relatively good, too) so I went to check my top score. On the original NES version I once got 470,000 pts (starting on level 15 and ending on 23). That is only good enough to put me at #63! I frankly don't believe some of the scores (like the top score of 999,999; that is just wrong and impossible), but I actually have video of my top score. I'm going to find it and have them put my name up.

    On the other hand, I know I can do well enough to crack the top 20 in the Gameboy version. I guess fewer people posted their scores on it.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  6. Re:Will there be a section for females? by JediTrainer · · Score: 2

    Not only is this childish and petty

    Not to criticize you or anyhing (because I think you have a great and valid point), but...

    ... you're new around here, aren't you?

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  7. Verification by ZuG · · Score: 2

    I wonder how they verify these sorts of things.

    Although I'm sure a lot of people stop and take a screenshot/photo when they make a big achievement, how easy would it be to forge/alter it. Photos are probably a bit "safer" than screenshots, because of the equipment that would be required to alter a photo, but I would imagine it would be fairly easy for a person to take a screen-shot of a decent score and then "enhance" it somehow. Is there any other way of verifying such things?

    1. Re:Verification by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 3
      I got into the book by posting by scores to rec.games.video.classics back in 1996 when someone (can't remember who now) was keeping track. That must have gotten incorporated somehow.

      As for verification, on rgvc, there wasn't any. While I know that my scores were honest, I don't know it that held across all of the scores reported. Nowadays, there is more verification, but I'm not sure what all the codes that TwinGalaxies uses mean (ie most of my scores are listed as verified by referee, but I sure as hell don't remember anyone else in the room when I posted that Bank Heist score.)

      I know a lot of these games lose a lot when you go back to them, but this might be enough encouragement for me to go back to some of them, just to post higher scores. I remember in rgvc that Lafe Travis kept inspiring me to greater playing heights. This is inspiration on crack - "You mean I might get put in a book for this?!?"

      -sk

  8. Atari 2600 Circus by Tyrannosaurus · · Score: 5

    I once scored over 4,000 on the Atari 2600 game Circus. (Anybody remember that one? You were a clown, bouncing around and popping balloons. Sweet. Eat your heart out, Quake 3 Arena!) I imagine that's some kind of record, considering only 9 people ever even played that game...

    ---

    --

    ---
    Gort! Klatu Barata Nikto!
    1. Re:Atari 2600 Circus by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      Sorry - I remember getting 4,0012 points once. Just after I ran that perfect Pitfall game... yeah. yeah.

  9. Hard to Keep Track of Early Games by bahtama · · Score: 2
    It's going to be hard to keep track of early games. I know many people that flipped the score in Defender and other Atari 2600 games. Games that only went so far before reseting the score to zero will be next to impossible to record. Maybe I will have to take out a patent on one-click alien shooting and say that I did it first.

    =-=-=-=-=
    "Do you hear the Slashdotters sing,

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  10. why a book? by Ben+Schumin · · Score: 3
    This is exactly the kind of thing web pages are designed to do, so why are they putting this in a book? It would be much more useful as a searchable database online.

    With a huge chunk of information like that, they could create a community around people who are trying to get high scores on video games. Message boards about your favorite games where you can communicate with other people who like the same games.

    I realize part of the reason they are publishing this book is to stroke the egos of the people involved, but they could really do so much more. It's disappointing to see the opportunity to create a new online community wasted.

    --

    Ben Schumin :-)

    1. Re:why a book? by luugi · · Score: 2

      money.

      --
      Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
  11. Will there be a section for females? by Lover's+Arrival,+The · · Score: 2
    I am quite a keen female gamer, though I don't really like the blood and guts type games, like Quake IV and all that, I do enjoy games like The Sims and Civilisation.

    The problem is that the gaming world seems to be terribly dominated by men. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a female section, like they do in the Olympics? That way, despite females probably not being very good at it (they are outnumbered and not as enthusiastic), there will still be a place for them to go.

    I think that playing games is fun, but perhaps some people play them too much. I think playing games 24/7 is okay if you are doing it for money, but not if you are not, because it might just be dangerous. Thats why you are supposed to take a break every 2 hours for 15 minutes.

    I stiull break those rules sometimes though, tee-hee :P

    They fuck you up, your mum and dad.

    --

    --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The

    1. Re:Will there be a section for females? by tred · · Score: 2
      Haha I can see it now. Female-Only servers, based of course on the honor system because of lack of a better option. Someone shows up and starts beating everyone else, and a few minutes later "are u a guy??? you dick!" followed by "i swear i'm a girl, briney spears rules!" or "h4h4 g1rlz sux0r"

      --
      - tred
    2. Re:Will there be a section for females? by Dr.+Prakash+Kothari · · Score: 2
      To be honest, I'm quite disapointed to see all this interest in keeping records and high scores for video games. I've always thought of gaming as a way to have fun and relax after a hard day. It's truly sad to see that our society has become focused on competition that casual pastimes like video gaming are subject to such close scrutiny and rivalry.

      I look back on my youth and some of my fondest memories involved staying up late having a sleepover at a friends house and playing video games until the sun came up. We did not care who scored the most points or who "fragged" the other players the most, but enjoyed the companionship and the act of playing the game itself. It's a shame that today's geeks feel the need to prove themselves by showing that they are better than everyone else. Not only is this childish and petty, but it ensures that at least one player does not have a good time playing.

      Sorry if this sounds too wistful, but I just don't understand the desire for such trivial competitions.

      --

      "Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or dead." -Kurt Cobain

  12. extra special value added feature... by yankeehack · · Score: 2

    I heard that the editors of the book will place an asterisk (*) by your name to indicate that you've moved out of your parent's basement and gotten laid.

  13. Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2
    Are you currently high?

    _ _ _
    I was working on a flat tax proposal and I accidentally proved there's no god.

  14. This is just too obsessive! by sharkticon · · Score: 2

    As fond as I am for the odd game or two it sort of disturbs me to see that some people take their game playing to such obsessive levels. When people started creating computer games back in the 70s I wonder if they ever realised quite how profoundly they would change society, and for the worse in many cases?

    I feel that whilst computer games can be beneficial and relaxing when they're part of a normal live, they have an addictive quality which makes people spend far too much time playing them, to the detriment of their social skills. We're seeing it now - too many people here on /. seem to know more about how to win a Quake deathmatch than how to deal with the opposite sex for instance. Spending all of your formative years in front of a computer leads to a level of social skills rivalling autism. Indeed, many of the symptoms seem eerily similar.

    Unfortunately, with recent statistics showing that computer gaming is an industry worth twice as much as Hollywood this trend seems to be accelerating. And parents nowadays seem more concerned with keeping their children quiet than fostering their social skills, which leaves them crippled when they finally have to enter the real world! How can this be right?

    Personally I think that children shouldn't be allowed to play computer games while they're young. Things like this and television do them no good - did you know obesity is on the increase in the under fives? My kids will be encouraged to play and have fun instead, and when they deserve a treat I'll get out something wholesome like Mary Poppins that we can all watch as a family.

    It's just not right to let your kids grow up knowing nothing other than Tekken Tag.

    --

  15. 2-digit-barrier in BLAZEMONGER! by DG · · Score: 2

    I wonder if anyone ever broke the 2-digit barrier playing BLAZEMONGER! and actually scored 10 points.

    My best game ever I played for almost a full minute, and only got an 8.

    DG

    Hi Dan!

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  16. When I was but a lad... by JediTrainer · · Score: 2

    I challenge the world to beat me in the card game "War". I used to always win (well... at least 50% of the time!) ...

    ... maybe it was because I was the only one who cared enough to pay attention. So what if nobody noticed that I took their ace with my 2?

    1... 2... 3... FLIP! I win again!

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  17. No one can....... by canning · · Score: 2
    touch my score in Burger Time. I was kick a** at that game. I could get that puppy to roll over twice, not an easy feat but never underestimate the will of a hungry boy. I used to wonder where one could get a magical burger oven like the one in the game.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  18. Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? by TeknoMage · · Score: 2

    I believe that would lead to a very disapointing
    look on reality.

    I've met atlhetes that program, and barkeeps
    that played amazing chess. Chess, like all forms
    of entertainment, is simply that. It doesn't
    reflect skill, it reflects experince.

    Yes there is an a logic to chess, I will not deny that.

    But is there any less logic to Football? I think
    not. In fact, I bet they are about equal.

    The point is this,
    one) people do these things because they are
    entertaining in some way. If its watching football, or
    coaching chess. They are entertaining.

    Its a simple fact that bordeom kills,
    we all need amusement, we all desire entertainment.

    So before you pass judgement on a person obsessed
    with Donkey Kong, realize, somewhere, somebody
    thinks your a fool for your obession with chess.

  19. Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? by coupland · · Score: 4

    I've whiled many a day away with drool on my chin trying to take out a shambler with a shotgun, but could these people perhaps be taking their fun a bit too seriously? As a game addict I still feel a bit embarassed when I see phrases like "stellar accomplishments", "inner genius", and yes... "athletes" used to describe the process of jumping over the barrels being hurled at me by a video gorilla named "Donkey Kong". Video games are no more an athletic sport than juggling or burping the alphabet. Sure it takes practise and some skill, but that doesn't make it a sport.


    ---
    1. Re:Taking ourselves a tad too seriously? by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

      Is Chess a serious game? What about football? Yet society has no objections to glorify world class chess/football players, and all they really are are another form of entertainment. OK, so football builds physical stamina and strenght but the X-generation need a different set of skills if they're to land on mars and navigate the asteroid belt. Or guide a nanoprobe through your bloodstream.

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
  20. What tha' by Fraew · · Score: 2

    One thing I noticed bout the site.. they've got top scores for PC and Mac games - but what-tha' no AMIGA high scores? Damned if my Record of 812-8 vs. Super Nashwan in Speedball 2 is going to be ignored because the don't have Amiga records!