Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Voting, Suing, Retiring

Slashback tonight brings you an update on Intel honcho Gordon Moore (whose famous observation will probably be written about in histories of the 20th century); more news on the state of 802.11 security; a word or three on Linuxgruven; and the odd link on election technologies to leave dimpled chads in the past.

What's the frequency, Kenneth? Maybe the analogies will just never stop, but Jethro73 points to this piece with "802.11's security issues compared to Swiss Cheese ...?"

The downside of all the attention being focused on the problems with 802.11 is that by the time there are some networks on my block to piggyback on, the holes will all be gone;)

Hopefully one of the last words here ... Rivendahl directs you attention to "this link to the StlToday.com web site giving a brief summary of a pending lawsuit against Linuxgruven.com, Inc. A bit of rumor says the owners cannot be found and perhaps fled. While I'd rather not report rumor, I would like to make sure the people Linuxgruven.com, Inc. has burned hear about them going down in flames and let them know also of the pending lawsuits. I don't know how much ex-employees may get out of it but at least spread the word, please. I know the teachers at Linuxgruven.com, Inc. teach their students to read /."

So it's time to put my Linuxgruven bumperstickers on eBay? Maybe they will mate with the LinuxOne distribution ...

Next year he'll be only half as old, though. cnkeller writes: "Gordon Moore has hit the maximum age of employment at Intel. As of May, he'll only be an honorary employee. Story here"

Please pick your poison; after that it's your fault. Erik Nilsson points to four informative articles about that which we Americans might prefer to hear nothing more about for a few years: voting, elections software, and Internet voting.

In 'No Easy Answers,' Lorrie Faith Cranor surveys elections technology, evaluates the prospects for Internet voting, and makes recommendations for action.

'Why Has Voting Technology Failed Us?' examines the performance of existing systems, and considers the prospects for improvement.

In 'Sweden to Experiment with E-voting,' Anders Olsson reports on Sweden's current electoral experiments.

In 'System Integrity Revisited,' Rebecca Mercuri and Peter Neumann examine the reasons why current voting systems have failed. They call on computer professionals to contribute their expertise to an informed discussion."

The upshot is still that there are no easy answers to ensuring that elections are accurate and fair.

122 comments

  1. Re:Honorary employee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I could set the building on fire by overclocking Amd Tbirds okay but that's the last straw

  2. I'm just jazzed... by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    The 802.11 article used the term "script kiddy"! It would be while if that's the next net jargon term to see widespread use.

  3. I propose a new law by bmetz · · Score: 2

    bmetz's law: The amount of people declaring Moore's law dead will double every 18 months.

    Of course we all know that it has to end sometime but I'm willing to bet it will hold true for the duration of my lifetime (50-70 years).

    Of course if you are easily amused I suggest you read news for the easily amused

    --
    What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    1. Re:I propose a new law by Ronin+SpoilSpot · · Score: 1

      Hmm
      50*12/18 ~ 33, so it should double approximatly 33 times.
      2^33 ~ 8*10^9
      Even if there is only one person now who declares Moores law dead, we would still have to breed a few billion more people for your proposed law to hold for 50 years. It would probably be completely impossible if there is more than one person now :)

      /RS - Nitpicker extraordinaire.

  4. OT: your sig by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    U.S. Gov't-in-Exile: http://www.USGovernment-in-Exile.org

    Umm, a "government in exile" is a legitimate government which has been driven into exile because a rival government has seized power. Unless you have some reason I'm not aware of, nobody affiliated with your site has any legitimate claim to the government of the United States, and hence cannot claim to be forming a "government in exile." Al Gore perhaps could make his claim (though he would not), but just a bunch of random people cannot.

  5. Re:I don't mean to be naive by pod · · Score: 2

    Look, I realize Intel has a bad rep for firing people who get too expensive (ie, anyone over 30 something, with stock options about to vest), but the guy's 72. Seeing as the usual retirement age is 55-65, a mandatory limit of 72 is not that bad, especially in the tech industry.

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  6. 72, but . . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    in 18 months, he'll be 144 . . .


    hawk

  7. Re:Yes to paper, no to receipts... by spitzak · · Score: 2

    Somebody suggested that the voter be allowed to print a fake receipt that says anything you want.

  8. Linuxgruven bumper stickers by booch · · Score: 2

    The bumper stickers with Linuxgruven on them were not from Linuxgruven. They were from Linuxcare. Linuxgruven came up with the name after they saw the bumper sticker. I don't think Linuxcare was too happy about that.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Linuxgruven bumper stickers by Twilight1 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I have a Linuxcare linuxgruven bumper sticker on my VeeWee... but I am becoming ashamed to drive around with it because people may associate it with the LinuxGruven scam. Dammit.

    2. Re:Linuxgruven bumper stickers by darkonc · · Score: 1

      well, how about replacing it with this one
      --

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  9. Too bad about Moore... by waldoj · · Score: 4

    Gordon Moore has hit the maximum age of employment at Intel. As of May, he'll only be an honorary employee.

    That's a shame -- his efficiency doubles every 18 months, I'm told. Think of all he could accomplish!

    Waldo

  10. Re:Just fix the system by artdodge · · Score: 1
    It leaves thing anti-democratic and unfair to all voters

    So if someone wins the popular vote, but their margin of victory nationwide is smaller than their margin of victory in New York City (i.e. New York City can override the will of the rest of the nation), that's democratic and fair?

    Of course the college isn't perfect. But I assert that direct voting would be worse.

  11. Re:Accurate, Fair. Pick any one by artdodge · · Score: 2
    FL2K is a great example.

    The GOP demanded accuracy, and the DNC cried "people are being cheated out of having their votes counted on a technicality! (unfair!)"

    The DNC demanded fairness, and the GOP cried "you're applying arbitrary standards to evaluate what is and is not a vote! (inaccurate!)"

    So it looks like you've summed up the situation pretty nicely.

  12. Re:Please no electronic elections by PD · · Score: 2

    Even if the election were completely fair, there would be no way to silence people who don't trust the system. Imagine the uproar in the last election multiplied 1000 times, for *every* election. That would be our nightmare.

  13. Please no electronic elections by PD · · Score: 4

    Without a clear trail of accountability and easy auditing, nobody's going to trust it. It doesn't matter if the system is mathematically foolproof. The system needs to be simple in implementation because the dumbest voter needs to understand how it works. If the system is too complicated, then ignorant people won't trust it. Even a lot of smart people won't trust it.

    Don't let the problem with chads fool us into thinking that a good paper based system is impossible.

    1. Re:Please no electronic elections by underwhelm · · Score: 2

      Demographic studies indicate that overweight people voted for Bush 2:1, so he got a larger share of America's sub-atomic particles, fatty tissue, and water.

      Democracy has finally arrived for America's quarks!

      --

      I don't need large brains to have a good time.

    2. Re:Please no electronic elections by Plinth · · Score: 1

      I don't think the key is understanding the system but trusting it. The important bit is that is as simple as use to possible, and makes at is as easy as possible for anyone who want to vote to vote. As long as people that the public trust understand it, and the informations on it's working is available for those inclined to look deeper, that would be good.
      I personally think there is an inherent problem in not representing those who feel that none of the choices represent them enough they would rather vote for no-one, but that's a different issue, though adding a box saying I don't want any of the above would at least yield some interesting figures.

      --
      -- "[The] NSA can eat shit and die until they stop listening to my phone calls" - TastyWheat
    3. Re:Please no electronic elections by y6y6y6 · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way: If we have e-voting the people who run the servers can decide who gets to be president. I mean sure, security measures are suppose to prevent that, but hey.......

      Jon Sullivan

      --

      Jon Sullivan
      www.jonsullivan.com
    4. Re:Please no electronic elections by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
      Huh? What do you mean, a majority of the US, based on land area?

      As I said, election of the president is primarily a matter for the states. Bush won a majority of those states. His popularity crosses diverse cultures within the US. Florida is much different than Wyoming which is much different than Alaska which is much different than New Hampshire. OTOH, Gore carried urban dwellers primarily, and that's about it. People in a small area are naturally going to share concerns that people some distance away won't care (as much) about. When you put a million people in that small area, attention skews toward that area, even if concerns from 50 miles away are just as valid.

      If you want to know why people who live in cities count less than people in rural areas, its because the people, as individuals, don't matter when it comes to electing the president. The United States is a union of states, and it's these states that choose the president, not the people. The states have all individually decided to let their presidential vote be determined on the basis of a popular vote within the state, but that's a different issue. It hasn't always been this way, either.

      The two-house legislature we have in the US is designed as a compromise between large states and small states. Remember, in 1776 people saw themselves primarily as Virginians or New Yorkers, not as Americans. They knew that direct popular representation would lead to what is called "tyranny of the majority" with Virginia and New York basically telling the other 11 what to do. At the same time, it isn't fair to let a handful of people dictate to much larger masses. Thus the compromise.

      There's also the issue that rural folks speak on behalf of the natural resources they're closer to and more directly responsible for. If it were up to Chicagoans, they're probably pave the rest of Illinois for a parking lot. The rest of Illinois feels differently. Sure, Chicago may have more people than the rest of the state put together, but those people have very valid concerns as well.

      It's a purely practical issue, and I don't fault people in big cities for looking after their own. I look after my own, too. But if the system is going to be fair, it has to try to protect the minority at the same time that it performs the will of the majority. This kind of protection is built into the US by virtue of the enumeration in the two legislative houses, and as I already said, it's no coincidence that the number of EC votes matches this exactly.

      In fact, I think it's pretty clear that this implies EC votes ought to be awarded by district like it is in Nebraska. Too bad most states have a "winner takes all" system. In Iowa, for example, all 7 votes went to Gore when only 2 of the 5 districts went for him, IIRC.


      I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies.

    5. Re:Please no electronic elections by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Are you reading anything I write? Representation in Congress and the EC is a compromise between states' rights and people's rights. But regardless of how that representation is determined, EC votes are allocated based on state laws and thus the election of the president is a matter for the states, not the people. Nothing in the Constitution says that a popular election must be used to select the president. I can't put it much more plainly than this.


      I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies.

    6. Re:Please no electronic elections by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2

      Election of the president is a matter for the states, not the people. Do you think it's merely coincidence that the number of electoral votes is exactly the same as the total number of representatives the state has in Congress? The federal Constitution nowhere says the states have to let the residents vote for president. The state legislatures, or the state governors, could decide how the state's votes would go.

      It's plain to see that the EC system works as it is. Look at any election map of the US to see how it voted. The majority of the states will be colored for the Republicans. This is even more dramatic if you color it by district or county. Who voted for Gore this last election? A couple big cities, and that's it. A majority of the US, from Florida to Alaska and points in between, wanted Bush. Bos-Wash, Chicago, and San-Angeles voted for Gore.

      As much as I think e-voting would be quicker and smoother (in theory), the fact is that it's much harder to keep a record. It's easier to tamper with electronic records than physical ones.

      What we really need is Condorcet voting. The plurality vote system we currently have is broken and stupid. The problem with elections right now is not campaign financing (I'm speaking to you, Sen. McCain) but the voting method we use. We all should be able to put our voice (money) behind any candidate we wish...it's free speech. The problem is that the current system keeps the two major parties firmly entrenched. If voting changed so that minor parties had a fair chance, campaigning would have to change. And if there were more than two parties to support, campaign financing would change.

      The founders knew the dangers of a single party holding a majority of the power. It's much safer to see coalitions of small parties being forced to work together on various issues. That way they have to appeal to a broader constituency.


      I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies.

    7. Re:Please no electronic elections by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of your post, but...

      "A couple big cities, and that's it. A majority of the US, from Florida to Alaska and points in between, wanted Bush. Bos-Wash, Chicago, and San-Angeles voted for Gore."

      Huh? What do you mean, a majority of the US, based on land area?

      If you want to make an argument against letting the popular vote decide using your argument above, you should explain why people who live in cities count less than people who live in rural areas.

      BTW, Gore won several New England states which don't have any big cities.

    8. Re:Please no electronic elections by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      > The United States is a union of states, and it's these states that choose the president, not the people.

      Would you then take the position that the current "weighting" of states based on their population is also broken? Should alaska have as big a say as california?

    9. Re:Please no electronic elections by demaria · · Score: 2

      And Bush won a whole bunch more states than Gore.

      Our current system helps the smaller states, it gives them more voice.

      It's a compromise.

    10. Re:Please no electronic elections by trolebus · · Score: 1
      Not to troll but take for instance Canada. The results of last years Federal Election were known the night of and we still use a piece of paper and pencil to vote up here in Canada. I know we are only about 30 million but that is more people than most states and we are able to serve even our most remote communities via the same system.

      That is not to say we have a good Prime Minister but it's not like there was any choice

  14. The *real* reason for 802.11 holes by dschuetz · · Score: 2
    (warning -- this is a deliberate troll. I must be channeling Discordia this morning...)

    From the article: That's just dandy. We're effectively being told that ... we're not worthy of properly designed and implemented security. A flawed system is considered sufficient.

    Maybe the FBI is behind the security flaws in 802.11? This way, as the technology proliferates and everyone's got it in their home networks, they can spy (and even root around in) on everyone's computers from the comfort of their vans...

    Or am I just being paranoid?

    1. Re:The *real* reason for 802.11 holes by leperjuice · · Score: 2
      No, you're not being paranoid. Just because cell phone encryption was crippled due to pressue from the NSA does not mean that 802.11 could be similarly compromised. No. Not at all...

      Why? Because the FBI would never spy on American citizens without a warrant! Just ask that Mr. Silly Pants J. Edgar Hoover!

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

    2. Re:The *real* reason for 802.11 holes by TheFlu · · Score: 2
      I think you're just being paranoid,
      but I have to say that I'm very much enjoying
      those JPEG's you have in your "Stuff" folder.

      We have lots of stuff >>> The Linux Pimp

  15. Linuxgruven still running ads? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

    I was surprised to see a full-page Linuxgruven ad in the latest issue of Linux Magazine. Are they still running ads?

    --
    bp
    1. Re:Linuxgruven still running ads? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Chances are, they bought ad space for 6 issues or something like that..... You know, like bands that get stuck with a 3 album contract but break up after 2 albums. Why else would we have "The best of Silverchair" CDs out?

  16. Coincidence can be fun by superdoo · · Score: 1
    I'm burning karma faster than a mir on re-entry, but I just had to say that I'm glad that some object, process, or idea has been given my name. You wouldn't believe the newspaper clippings I've collected about this whole "chad" fiasco. The political cartoons ("Dance of Satan's Chads", "Chad for brains") have been very self-affirming. Not-to-mention the wonderful phrases like "swinging-door chad" or "pregnant chad". My name has been embedded in the consciousness of America forever. I can laugh at this even more because I'm Canadian and we always get a kick out of laughing at you silly people south of us.

    Chad.

    Weee! Bring it on. I have enough karma in real life that I will gladly donate some of the electronic variety.

    1. Re:Coincidence can be fun by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian and we always get a kick out of laughing at you silly people south of us.

      We don't mind. 99 percent of you live within about 1 mile of the border, so we know you really like us ;)

  17. Re:Easy Voting: The Bane of a Successful Democracy by Xerithane · · Score: 1
    I just have to commend this post.

    Beautiful job, really.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  18. They also like to examine your piss by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

    Intel is one of the companies that takes seriously the things you do on your own time away from work.

  19. Re:I don't get this internet voting thing by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    it will never be internet voting because (even though I cant see this happening) they don't know someone is holding a gun to your head

    Then there will never be absentee ballots either.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  20. Mandatory Retirement is not "Age Discrimination" by Otto · · Score: 2

    If you'd actually read the law you're talking about, you'd see that having a compulsory retirement age is not illegal. There are restrictions placed around it, but I feel fairly certain that they are within those restrictions.

    Link to the actual law...

    Quote: "Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit compulsory retirement of any employee who has attained 65 years of age and who, for the 2year period immediately before retirement, is employed in a bona fide executive or a high policymaking position, if such employee is entitled to an immediate nonforfeitable annual retirement benefit from a pension, profitsharing, savings, or deferred compensation plan, or any combination of such plans, of the employer of such employee, which equals, in the aggregate, at least $44,000."

    There's much much more, but that's just one example..

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  21. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 by Otto · · Score: 2

    There is no federal civil rights statute that makes age discrimination illegal

    Wrong. How about "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967"? It's been amended a few times, but it's still US Law.

    Age Discrimination is illegal. Mandatory Retirement is not necessarily Dicrimination, however. Read the thing (or skim it, it's long and dull).

    http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/adea.html
    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  22. Re:Honorary employee? by austad · · Score: 3

    HR to Gordon Moore:
    What would you say..... ya do here????

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  23. Re:I don't mean to be naive by DruidFyr · · Score: 1

    And I know of 20 to 30 year olds who now reside in nursing homes in South Florida due to strokes. And I'm not talking about people in poor health to start with, I'm talking people who jogged and didn't smoke! A stroke can hit anyone at anytime.

  24. Gordon Moore is age 72 by WeeGadget · · Score: 2
    According to the Gordon Moore Bio on Intel's website, he was born on January 3, 1929 -- making him 72 years old.

    72 seems an odd age for mandatory retirement. Intel's mandatory retirement age is probably 70, but they let him slide a few years because he's a founder of the company.

    Jonathan Weesner
    Level D Flight Simulators using Linux at NLX Corp. That's my idea of FUN !!

  25. Re:I don't mean to be naive by TetsuoShima · · Score: 1

    No, and ....

  26. VeniVidiVoti by emmanuel.charpentier · · Score: 1

    Have a look, it's a collaborative writing library, where any group of person can write any sort of text (laws, constitution, petition, newspaper, poem...) using the most basic democratic principles.
    It offers a mix of participative (or direct) democracy and representative democracy.

    VVV Library (I'm looking for a group willing to test drive it)

  27. Re:I don't mean to be naive by NovaX · · Score: 1

    I think that's a bit niave. Yes, I definately agree it should be brought up when the industries say they need more foriegners brought in, shouldn't dump older folks because of their salary, etc. However, the science and engineering fields are expanding and do need more students, and if your trying to say we're all working for nothing and the industry really isn't expanding past killing off old people..

    Also, some people past retirement are able to become consultants, especially government scientists to their respective labs. This is very true for large scale projects, such as laser systems (ie, NIF at LLNL) where the head scientists/engineers must retire in the middle of the project. As their still badly needed afterwards, they can and do consult for about the same salary, and can help the labs afterwards. How far this goes for other scientists/engineers for companies, I'm not to sure.

    PS. the foriegners bit - I just meant it was pretty bad to fire all the cobal people, say "We need people badly!" and try as hard as they could but ended up just giving in and hiring them back temporarily. It was just pitiful on the industry's part.


    -----------------------------------------

    --

    "Open Source?" - Press any key to continue
  28. Re:I don't mean to be naive by NovaX · · Score: 1

    Okay, that whole statement I agree with in entirety. And in no way was I foreigner bashing, as my example with unloading skilled professionals for cheaper fresh labor was wasteful.

    With graduates, I thought they usually make them sign contracts for a number of years they must work for. In any case, that case is a demand for labor which should help (temporarily) increase wages, which for any worker is a plus. To much of this could help flood the market, i guess.

    Retirement age should be at the point where the individual is incompitent/unable to perform their duties. There should also be something the worker could move into (ie, more of a desk job) if possible, rather then just forced out by the company due to age.


    -----------------------------------------

    --

    "Open Source?" - Press any key to continue
  29. Re:I don't mean to be naive by NovaX · · Score: 1

    lol, i thought you meant forced retirement only, which is what I was refering to. Of course people should be allowed to retire when they wish to. I've known a number of people who've come out of retirement or are looking into going into it, as well as friends already starting IRAs in order to build up a nice nest egg.

    For example, I've seen professors with tenure retire, and then a few years begin at a new university, obtain tenure, and later retire.


    -----------------------------------------

    --

    "Open Source?" - Press any key to continue
  30. Re:Hmmm by Tofuhead · · Score: 1

    Sounds like that /back title was taken from the RAMBUS company plan.

    "Voting": Rambus was a JEDEC member

    "Suing": SDRAM patent disputes

    "Retiring": With even Intel distancing themselves from RAMBUS, what else are they going to do? I don't think demand for Nintendo 64 Expansion Paks is too high nowadays, what with GAMECUBE on the way.

    < tofuhead >
    --

    --
    It is still the dark of night.
  31. Trolling: The Bane of a Successful Community by pq · · Score: 1
    Making voting easier is only empowering the stupid (and by virtue of which, those apathetic to the future of our world).

    Yeah, the stupid, the niggers, the slit-eyed chinks, those evil breed-like-rabbits Latinos - how presumptuous of them to think that they should have the same rights as us clever people! And those Jews - contaminating our pure Aryan blood - what cheek! I hope you voted for Buchanan.

    Yes, okay, so IHBT. So f***ing what?

    --
    "I will take the Ring," he said, "though I do not know the way."
  32. Re:Easy Voting: The Bane of a Successful Democracy by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
    The truth is, there is no major flaw in our voting proccess. The situation down in Florida had nothing to do with a "broken system" as some would advocate. It has to do with people who are just simply stupid.

    Troll, stupidity, or ignorance? I'll assume the latter.

    The most disturbing parts of the Florida Fraud had nothing to do with the balloting procedures (as illegal and immoral as those procedures were). Thousands of people with clean criminal records were taken off the voting rolls in a purported purge of "felons" performed by a private company. Police roadblocks harassed blacks on their way to the polls.

    Fortunately, the laws of probability say that the inaccurasies will even out in the end.
    No. Not in a situation where certain areas are given technology known to undercount (both from usuablilty issues and physical failure), and others are given accurate vote tabulators.

    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | http://www.infamous.net/

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  33. Moore could have stayed if he had wanted by cameldrv · · Score: 2

    No one at Intel would have forced him out. If he had wanted to stay, he could have had the age changed. Clearly he wants to scale back his duties and concentrate on his foundation and being retired. Hitting the age is a good excuse to do this without alarming shareholders.

    1. Re:Moore could have stayed if he had wanted by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Moore used to be Chairman.

      Then he gave that job to Andy Grove.

      Intel's board is a lump of play-doh, being added to as stuff gets stuck in it.

      And how hard is the job of a director, anyway. You only have to show up once a year, if that. The rest you can get your lackeys to do.

      The point here isn't Moore's workload. It's his desire to add heft to a page of the Intel policy manual, one that Moore himself might have written, or certainly renewed, back when he was CEO.

      Three-ring binders rule the lives of corporate droids. Never forget that.

      --Blair

  34. Please: electronic elections by underwhelm · · Score: 2

    How hard is it to make your electronic voting system spit out a paper trail?

    Which is more reliable, a paper trail generated by a computing machine with limited options (if Bush print "BUSH"; if Gore print "GORE") or one generated by humans?

    I think we already have our control group.

    Make the voting software open source, and the smart people don't have to trust the system, they can trust their own eyes (or what other trustworthy smart people tell them the code says). The dumb people don't need a "reason" not to trust something, they'll make something up. That's why we call them dumb.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  35. Ageism is a necessary part of our society by Rix · · Score: 1

    How is a mandatory retirement age any different that an "age of majority"? We apply many restrictions to those under that age, how is it any different when applied to the other end of the spectrum?

    1. Re:Ageism is a necessary part of our society by Rix · · Score: 1

      Then if 65 is "close enough to [insert xenophobic society of choice here]'s standards" why not have forced retirement, license revocation, et cetera at that point? Both ages are entirely arbitrary. I've not met many pre-18 year olds that consider themselves unworthy of said rights, nor any post-65 year olds.

      Why have we not seen many restrictions on post-65 year olds? Because the people who get to vote will pass 65, but they'll never be under 18 again.

    2. Re:Ageism is a necessary part of our society by ebh · · Score: 2

      We restrict minors because they're not (by whatever definition) "grown up". Obviously, picking the arbitrary age of 18 does not accurately measure the maturity of every single person, but it's close enough by U.S. society's standards. OTOH, there's no age that is even that accurate at telling when someone has "grown down" enough to start restricting them again.

  36. Moore's Run by kahuna720 · · Score: 1

    Gordon Moore has hit the maximum age of employment at Intel. As of May, he'll only be an honorary employee.

    And then the Sandmen come to take him to Carousel.

    --
    props to all dead homiez
  37. Gordon Moore's next job? by imac.usr · · Score: 4

    Surely someone with his experience qualifies for this position.


    --

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  38. Bumper Sticker? by mohaine · · Score: 1

    Hell, I have a tshirt. I think I might frame it. It sort of sums up the last 2 years.

    --
    (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Yo, dude. The sidebar said he was born on 3 Jan 1929, so he's 72, not 65.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  42. Age discrimination is illegal (link) by ProfDumb · · Score: 1
    Contrary to other posts, there is a federal law that prohibits age discrimination. See the EEOC page on age discrimination.

    From that page:

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA's protections apply to both employees and job applicants. Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his/her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment -- including, but not limited to, hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training.

  43. Yes to paper, no to receipts... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Yes there must be an audit trail, yes machine-generated paper is good, but NO handing out receipts that show how you voted.

    The problem is the possibility of vote coercion - your boss/landlord/relative says they'll do something nasty to you unless you bring them a receipt from the polls that shows you voted the way they want you to. It doesn't matter whether the receipt has your name on it or not, as long as it shows how you voted, and it's hard to fake (and if it's easy to fake, it's not a useful receipt).

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  44. Geezers in Technology. by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Oh, come on. Mandatory retirement might make sense for people doing physical labor, and it might be harder for some of us over-40 geezers to pull all-nighters than it used to be, but there's no inherent reason to send us on Logan's Run when we hit 30, or 60, or 90. A lifetime of experience in technology may or may not be useful today, and is often more useful in management or research than in direct-product implementation, but some guy over 72 may have a lot more perspective on reality than some kid under 22, even if the kid _was_ a CEO for last year's failed dot-com.


    Also, I've done construction work with old guys. They don't move as fast as kids, and don't swing the hammer as many times, but somehow the nails go in the board a lot faster because they did it the way it needed to be done and put it in the places that need the nails most. And inexperienced workers can do a fine job with well-aged perfectly straight wood they bought at the hardware store, but when you're dealing with wood that might be a bit warped, or a bit green, or that you milled from real trees, or slate roofing where every piece of material is unique, you really want some old guy who's been building buildings on farms to be in charge. Sure, the old guys make _us_ haul the heavy stuff around, while they give it a little push here and stick a wedge under it there which cuts the work in half, and spend a while sharpening their tools just right instead of chopping away, and their attitude towards digging ditches often includes renting a backhoe for the rough work and doing the detail by hand, instead of all muscle or all machine, but don't go thinking it's time to throw _them_ out on the woodpile....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  45. Voting much earlier and more often. by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. Telling the public to trust the election results because they came from computers is far less credible than telling them to believe in the results of lever-style machines. Where computers have the potential to be really useful is to help track down anomalies in the process and find where to go look for the miscounted votes, stuffed ballot boxes, and run the manual counts on the machine-counted ballots that got confused by hanging chad or extra holes punched in by Demopublicans. It might not have mattered in Florida, where the Republican court maneuvers effectively kept most of the ballots from being successfully recounted, but that's where the processes need the most help.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. Re:Honorary employee? by Kishar · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ok, that would be great.

    --

  47. Too Late - Microsoft Democracy 2000 by Jens · · Score: 1
    1996 - The Satire:
    http://www.gksoft.com/a/fun/microsoft-democracy.ht ml

    2001 - The Reality:

    http://slashdot.org/articles/01/01/11/2211224.shtm l

    Oh yes: "One of Bill's first programs was for making class schedules at his school. He devised it so he could share classes with the prettiest girls. He earned $4200 for this project."
    Read it at http://www.esllessons.com/lessons/reading/reading- discovery-gates.html

    This -- "person" -- is supposed to create a voting software that decides over America's future?

    I'M SCARED.

  48. Re:I don't mean to be naive by sheckard · · Score: 1

    Airline pilots are required by the FAA to retire at 60. Note that the age at which a pilot (not airline, just pilot in general) is no longer allowed to fly is determined by his ability to pass a medical exam, but for some reason the FAA believes that once an airline captain reaches the age of 60 they are somehow unsafe.

  49. Wireless Article by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1
    You would think that if you're going to post an article, you'd at least post the original instead of yahoo's interpretation of it...

    (I don't work for zdnet, but just feel they should've gotten the credit for it)

    Zdnet Link


    ---GEEK CODE---
    Ver: 3.12
    GCS/S d- s++: a-- C++++ UBCL+++ P+ L++
    W+++ PS+ Y+ R+ b+++ h+(++) r++ y+

  50. Re:I don't mean to be naive by climer · · Score: 1

    WHAT!!!

    Are you totally nuts? Just open the door and beg to be screened by your DNA. Are you in love with an actuary or something?

    Do you really think that someone over the age of 60 is too much of a risk to employ? My god they might become worth too much to the company and then DIE. Give me a break.

    Listen if you manage to make it to 60 (or 72) with your attitude then you will really want to be able to find work.

    /Duncan

    Duncan Watson

    --

    Duncan Watson
  51. Moderators on CRACK by Christianfreak · · Score: 1
    He's completely on topic. He's a karma burning troll! :)

    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

  52. Re:From the Slashback Homepage: by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
    Thank you for your post, citizen! (Every reply counts towards my Troll Merit Badge.)

    --

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

  53. Re:From the Slashback Homepage: by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
    Thanks for posting; I give your flame a rating of "4". (All flames are rated on a scale of 1 to 10.) You seem to have the necessary faux-anger, but your lack of originality keeps you from "standing out in the crowd". Perhaps you should reevalutate your strategy and try again.

    Once again, thanks... remember: each reply gives me points towards my Troll Merit Badge! (And the Scoutmaster will never fuck me if I don't get the badge. Timothy got the badge by posting his inane Slashcrap, and the Scoutmaster immediately cored his asshole like a rotten apple. All of the We-blows were jealous.) At any rate, the crapflooders are already making good use of my link, so I'm sure to get the badge... your flames are just bonus points.

    --

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

  54. Accurate, Fair. Pick any one by onceler · · Score: 1
    The upshot is still that there are no easy answers to ensuring that elections are accurate and fair.
    Is that implying that we can have one or the other, but not both?
  55. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

    My array indicies start at 0 so 63 should be the age of retirement.

  56. So, How Old Is Moore? by istartedi · · Score: 2

    The article didn't say. I guess he's 64. He must have lots of stock and stuff. So Intel doesn't need you when you're 64, but it probably still feeds you. ...OK, geek and Beatles references in the same post. I'll stop now.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Thanks. I think maybe the trend towards tall ads to the side of articles caused me to tune it out the first time.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      What kind of computer company makes you retire at age 65? What a silly number. They should make it 64 instead.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by IvyMike · · Score: 2

      The article didn't say.

      Sure it did, in the sidebar: "Jan. 3, 1929: Born in San Francisco."

    4. Re:So, How Old Is Moore? by delcielo · · Score: 1

      There has to be something he could do around there. He could be handy, mending a fuse, when their lights have gone.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  57. Re:I don't mean to be naive by antis0c · · Score: 2

    Well, after the age of 60, your risk of stroke, and heart attack greatly increases... I can see the rational behind this.. I'd rather not be in a commercial airline and suddenly the pilot has a stroke, dies and falls face first onto the flight stick, putting the plane into a downward spiral.. (meanwhile the copilot is in the john) Sure there are probably a lot of healthy 60 year olds with no prior medical conditions, but I've met 60 year olds that are in perfect health and then suddenly one day they have a stroke or a severe heart attack .. Its probably in the best interest to have a mandate like that.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  58. People Vs Computers by HerrGlock · · Score: 1

    Due to conservation of intelligence, every 18 months, people will lose an amount equal to doubling the clock speed of the CPUs.

    Hmmm, surprised that was not part of the original law as it seems to be a truism.

    DanH
    Cav Pilot's Reference Page

    --
    Cav Pilot's Reference Page
    UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins anymore
  59. Lorrie Faith Cranor by Laplace · · Score: 1

    I did quite a bit of analysis on her Ph.D. thesis several years ago. A lot of the things she did in it were pretty cool. Unfortunately, some of it was totally bogus. None the less, she often has very interesting things to say. A gratuitous link.

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
  60. Re:Mandatory Retirement is not "Age Discrimination by rifter · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, this meands that if you are younger than 40 and are told you are not hired because you are too young, tough noogies.

  61. Re:I don't mean to be naive by mad_cow · · Score: 1
    If it is illegal I don't imagine that it's too huge a deal for him anyways... it was his rule to begin with.

    Moore himself helped craft the retirement edict that is nudging him off the board. ``It must have been 20 years ago,'' he said. ``I could have set up a founder's exception.'' But, the innovator wistfully added, ``it seemed so far away then.''

  62. The Evil Cube by fm6 · · Score: 3
    Note that Moore has a cubicle (Quicktime VR here), not an office. Like all Intelians. I suppose Moore's accomplishments as an industrialist, scientist, and engineer outweigh his role in pushing the "Privacy is Unproductive" doctrine -- but just barely.

    __

  63. Lawsuits? by monkeydo · · Score: 1
    this link to the StlToday.com web site giving a brief summary of a pending lawsuit against Linuxgruven.com, Inc. A bit of rumor says the owners cannot be found and perhaps fled. While I'd rather not report rumor, I would like to make sure the people Linuxgruven.com, Inc. has burned hear about them going down in flames and let them know also of the pending lawsuits.

    Wow, for someone who desn't want to spread rumors, you sure must want to start them. No where in that article does is it written that anyone has filed suit against linuxgruven.com. The article only says that the Missouri Attny General's office is investigating "complaints"

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  64. Voting Machines by fishbonez · · Score: 1
    From the voting articles: The startling result is, with the exception of optical, older technologies were significantly more accurate than newer technologies.

    Not every problem is best solved with a new technology solution. New technology creates the potential for new and unforeseen problems. Sometimes it's better to stick with something that is known to work especially when fundamental rights are involved.

    --
    Frylock: That's not a toy!
    Master Shake: You say that about everything you own. You should own toys. They're fun.
  65. Re:I don't mean to be naive by DavidBrown · · Score: 2

    It's not illegal.

    There is no federal civil rights statute that makes age discrimination illegal, and age is not a protected class entitled to the additional safeguard of the "strict scrutiny" test for the constitutionality of government actions.

    If this were a government action (and Intel employment policies should not be construed as a government action) then the constitutional test that would apply is the "rational basis" test, in which the state action is legal if it is rationally related to a legitmate government purpose.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  66. IPSEC not just for VPNs by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 2

    I've been meaning to start using IPSEC for my internal network as yet another layer of security: the routers would reject (and log) all non-IPSEC traffic, and make use of IPSEC's authentication to make certain that only properly-identified machines can talk to anybody else.

    Before even considering adding any kind of internal wireless access point, I would make certain to implement IPSEC. At that point, somebody hijacking or eavsdropping on the wireless network wouldn't be able to understand anything (regardless of the wireless protocol) and wouldn't be able to talk to anybody (again, regardless of the wireless protocol). I suppose an attacker might be able to set up multiple wireless devices that talk to each other...but that doesn't give her much.

    Considering all the historical security trouble with sealed boxes, I'm surprised that more people haven't taken this route from the beginning.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
  67. Pity he went to make Intel... by autocracy · · Score: 1

    ...'cause I think it wouldn've rocked to be buying my computer chips from Fairchild Semiconductor in Portland, ME. Yeah, that's right - he's not only responsible for Moore's law, but also for IP agreements :O

    I can't be karma whoring - I've already hit 50!

    --
    SIG: HUP
  68. Hmmm by autocracy · · Score: 3

    Voting, Suing, Retiring - yeah, that sounds like a good life plan to me!

    I can't be karma whoring - I've already hit 50!

    --
    SIG: HUP
  69. Unicorns? by cbr372 · · Score: 1

    Should unicorns be allowed to vote?

    --
    Cedric Balthazar Rotherwood
    Sun Certified Programmer for the Java Platform +
    System Admin. for Solaris
  70. Audit Trail by robt · · Score: 1
    "The upshot is still that there are no easy answers to ensuring that elections are accurate and fair."

    Not true. The answer is simply to provide an audit trail.

    In its simplest form, this is to use paper ballots.

    In a concession to providing a quick vote count, it is to use voting devices that register a vote electronically and print two "receipts". One is retained under the control of the supervisor of elections and provides verification, if necessary, for a hand recount. The other is taken from the voting precinct by the individual voter. The receipts are identified only by serial number.

  71. Maryland Enacts Uniform Voting by robbway · · Score: 3

    As one of the final acts of this sessions state Senate, Maryland signed into law that there be uniform voting procedures throughout the state. This is partially because of the Florida fiasco that Florida didn't get to solve, but also because some districts ran out of ballots. Had Maryland been the swing state, it would have been just as ugly. Being a Marylander, I was glad to hear about voting issues one more time.

    ----------------------

  72. Re:I don't mean to be naive by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1
    If the clause was written in the 1960s, then I'm pretty sure it's "Grandfathered" in some way.

    I'd also be willing to wager that mandatory retirement ages are legal as long as the employee is informed of that age before they begin employment.

    IANAL, however.

    the unbeliever
    aim:dasubergeek99
    yahoo!:blackrose91
    ICQ:1741281

  73. Moore as a publicity stunt by krismon · · Score: 1
    Barrett evoked Moore and his famous law at a news conference Wednesday to unveil a new chip-making machine developed by a research consortium founded by Intel and other chip makers. The machine will enable chip makers to create even smaller circuits on a single semiconductor wafer, possibly extending Moore's Law until around 2015.

    Sad how they just use him to promote the "next new thing." I wonder though, how much longer does Moore's law really apply, I'm kind of leaning toward a date sometime before 2015... maybe the 18 months the "law" is currently on will be adjusted again to 24 months or longer...

    Kris.

  74. Re:I don't get this internet voting thing by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they would, but then the people in Texas might have a picture of Gore with an axe through his head and Bush with a halo over his head. Then he Bush would argue that the zit on his face cost him the election or something. Pictures are just too abstract to decide black and white if it's okay or not. Nice thought though =)

  75. Re:I don't get this internet voting thing by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, nice try =) It's way easier to submit an internet type ballot than a mailed absentee ballot. I mean, compare an email to a real a letter.

  76. I don't get this internet voting thing by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

    The next technology step towards improving voting does not have to be databases or internet voting. In fact it will never be internet voting because (even though I cant see this happening) they don't know someone is holding a gun to your head to vote Bush. Even more possible is a sign or two or a commercial on TV for president because that too is illegal. Databases, while a better idea, are too hard to get the US convinced to go along with it since they are all paranoid about hacking. Which is slightly true since some guy can go "update voting set canidate='Gore';". The easiest, best, quickest way to get technology in the door is to have like a touch screen computer that you just touch the person you want to vote for. When you're done it doesn't send it to a database or anything. Instead, it just punches out your card for you. Hell, give the option of deciding whether they want to do it on the computer or not, since after all, there would be no way to tell the difference between the two except one is nice and clean and done right. While the other may have to worry about chads or something. Which would also give a more legit reason to just toss them out.

    1. Re:I don't get this internet voting thing by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Someone holding a gun to your head as you vote is unlikely in the USA -- no one man can stop such incidents from being investigated, so anyone using such tactics would soon be impeached or indicted. In some other countries, it happens every election -- the Army's out there guarding the polls, and somehow the candidate endorsed by the Army always wins... And the Nazis in Germany and Fascists in Italy used intimidation by street thugs as a campaign tactic -- but I think it was of candidates and newspaper editors, not of individual voters. I hope Americans wouldn't stand for that either.

      But there is a considerable history in this country of vote-buying. In the 19th century, it was quite common in the big cities for campaign workers to hand out ballots already filled in, along with a beer -- and a promise of cash after you went and turned in that form. Or maybe your boss would hand you a ballot already filled in... So reforms required that ballots come only from the supposedly neutral pollworkers, and be filled out at the polls, in secret. You could pay someone to vote for you, but you could not tell whether or not he had -- and you might get most of the people taking your money and voting against you because you were a worse crook than them...

      So internet voting and absentee ballots both leave the door open for vote-buying, or for your boss to tell you how to vote if you want to keep your job. They also make the "vote early and often" type of fraud safer than if the crooks have to stand in line at each polling place. The difference is that absentee ballots are hard to get (except in Oregon). You've got to prove you really exist, that you have a reason you can't come to the polls, and in many states go through a bunch of mickey-mouse. People who can handle that are not going to be easy to buy or intimidate. But internet voting is (supposed to be) easy.

  77. Re:I don't mean to be naive by zedzed · · Score: 1
    I think that's a bit niave. Yes, I definately agree it should be brought up when the industries say they need more foriegners brought in, shouldn't dump older folks because of their salary, etc. However, the science and engineering fields are expanding and do need more students, and if your trying to say we're all working for nothing and the industry really isn't expanding past killing off old people..

    I am not in to foreigner bashing. I don't believe a person's opportunities should be limited by who they chose for parents.

    Let me make the point in a different way. There may be a need for more students. But many companies (I'd say most from what I see) waste or underutilize the engineering talent that is available to them. There are mandatory retirement ages, poor working conditions (e.g., cubicles), overspecified job requirements, etc., etc.

    This may not be surprising. Companys should try to minimize costs. Unfortunately, they sometimes do this by displacing costs. For example, hiring recent graduates that someone else paid to get trained.

    It doesn't make much sense to have a mandatory retirement age, though. They have higher salaries, but the point of raising their salaries was to keep them from going to another employer because they had valuable skills.

  78. Re:I don't mean to be naive by zedzed · · Score: 1
    Retirement age should be at the point where the individual is incompitent/unable to perform their duties.

    I disagree. "Retirement" should occur when the individual decides that s/he has sufficient financial resources (e.g., 401k) to not have to work and that s/he would rather be retired than working. Becoming unable to perform ones duties is more a disability issue, but some people may decide to retire if they think that it has become too difficult to perform their duties.

    Among my acquaintences I can think of one who has adequate funds, recently retired at age 55 and says he is enjoying it. Another has the money, is working when he can find the work, and recently passed age 80.

  79. Re:I don't mean to be naive by zedzed · · Score: 2

    What do you mean "smack of". It is rather blatant age discrimination. One more reason not to go to work for Intel. That and cubicles and maybe other things.

    Age discrimination is evidence that there is no shortage of technical workers.

    Illegal? IANAL.

  80. Re:I don't mean to be naive by zedzed · · Score: 2
    In general though, should companies be allowed to tell their employees that their service is no longer appreciated for the sole fact that their age has progressed to a certain number?
    Allowed to? Yes, they should be allowed to. You shouldn't outlaw every dumb thing someone might want to do. But why would they want to?

    This and any other example of age discrimination should be recorded in a file and brought up any time someone says there is a shortage of technical workers.

    Also, this sort of thing should be brought up anytime someone says we need to increase the number of students enrolled in engineering or science. It would be dumb to start a career in a field where you could get kicked out just for reaching a particular age.

  81. Doubletake by TheFlu · · Score: 2
    I misread StlToday as ShiToday? Hmm. It seems that domain is available too...

    Lot's o' Linux shiToday >>> The Linux Pimp

  82. Re:Easy Voting: The Bane of a Successful Democracy by Xuther · · Score: 1

    Thousands of people with clean criminal records were taken off the voting rolls in a purported purge of "felons" performed by a private company.

    The problem there was some of them had committed their crimes in states where once they were let out of prison their right to vote was restored. Florida's laws on the books did not follow the same statute. That said, most people did not contest that they weren't eligable until after the election. If you receive a letter in the mail saying that there was a problem registering you because you match a profile on a list and don't take the time to get it fixed who's fault is that?

    Police roadblocks harassed blacks on their way to the polls.

    Said it before and I'll say it again. Prove it! The first thing I'd do if any such thing happened to me or my fellows is to grab a camera and document it. Failing that I'd call a news agency who'd have a field day with live footage. The fact that nothing else has come of this speaks for itself.

    Not in a situation where certain areas are given technology known to undercount (both from usuablilty issues and physical failure), and others are given accurate vote tabulators.

    If they couldn't tell by looking at the finished card when after they voted that something didn't look right, I have to pity them for that.
    It is also my understanding that a large number of these undervotes came from using an optronics system with the wrong type of ink.
    God helps us should we implement an e-lection over the internet. I can just see the headlines now, "New evidence by computing firm proves Gore had the election hacked!"
    Short of having election workers standing over your shoulder making sure you don't screw up a ballot, I don't think this issue is completely solvable. I'm reminded of the system we used in michigan when I lived there. It was optronic, it used a special marker to complete a line in a broken arrow, and before the page was fed into the machine, it was checked over for extra marks, missing marks, etc. Upgrading the entire nation to something like that makes sense in a way.

  83. Re:I don't mean to be naive by Elendur · · Score: 1

    Allowed to? Yes, they should be allowed to. You shouldn't outlaw every dumb thing someone might want to do. But why would they want to?

    But in this case they're doing it TO someone else, which is where we start outlawing dumb things. Do anything dumb you want, as long as you don't do something dumb to me.

  84. OT...Carousel is a lie! by protein+folder · · Score: 1

    and that's really all I remember about that movie

    ----

    --
    Your mind is squeezed by a blast of pain!
  85. NO MORE CHADS!!! by GrandCow · · Score: 1

    You people dont understand the horror of actually having the name Chad. Till the whole election thing I didn't even know chad was a word... The first day they started talking about it people would walk in to my store and get OFFENDED that my name was chad. Damn! After a few days people started becoming comedians... That wouldn't have been too bad if people could be original, but NO, every single person, 10 times a day, 5 days a week would come up with the same lame "so how's the baby doin" or "I dont see your dimples" joke.

    It got to the point where I was ready to strangle people for that stuff, but they didn't know any better. They were all the greatest comedians born in the history of the world. To this day I still get those jerks in the store, I dealt with 2 today.

    I'm askin slashdot, as a community, please write your congressmen and request a change to electronic voting! Think of all the abused Chad's out there in the world! Well actually I'd be happy with just changing the name to John's. Theres a name you dont hear every day.

    In fact, I think I'll start a petition now... Everyone who's with me in changing the Chad's to John's reply to my post! If we can get enough responses we'll have a good start! Do it for the children!

    -C

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:NO MORE CHADS!!! by cicadia · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to talk to this guy for a while...

      --
      Living better through chemicals
  86. ElectionMethods.org by RussP · · Score: 1

    For some good information on voting methods, please see ElectionMethods.org.

    --
    I watch Brit Hume on Fox News
  87. Re:I don't mean to be naive by mewsenews · · Score: 1

    Bill Maher once said that he didn't think the current mindset towards racism and sexism should be applied to ageism. He said something like "Damnit, they're kids, they're not real people yet, they're still developing".. I added the "damnit" I think. Although, he was talking about the young people not the old people. Still, I think ageism is fairly valid in some cases.

  88. Re:I don't mean to be naive by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    But doesn't a "mandatory retirement age" smack of ageism and being wholly illegal?

    Dancin Santa

  89. Re:I don't mean to be naive by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    In general though, should companies be allowed to tell their employees that their service is no longer appreciated for the sole fact that their age has progressed to a certain number? This sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen. Not that Intel's got a fear of lawsuits, though.

    Dancin Santa

  90. I don't mean to be naive by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5

    But doesn't a "mandatory retirement age" smack of ageism and be wholly illegal?

    Dancin Santa

    1. Re:I don't mean to be naive by blair1q · · Score: 2

      And according to the federal age-discrimination law someone else posted, the forced-retirement exemption only applies to upper-level executives who have golden parachutes.

      Rank-and-file engineers, or that old codger in the machine shop who knows more about aluminum than you know about your mom, are safe from the "policy".

      --Blair

    2. Re:I don't mean to be naive by snoop_chili_dog · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's probably a little bit nicer. Some people obviously lose it past a certain age. I'm not saying everyone does, but some people do. It's a lot easier to tell them "Look this is what the rules say. You understood this when we hired you. We don't want to do this." than "Look you can't handle this job anymore because you old."

      --
      But Yogi, the RIAA won't like that.
  91. Honorary employee? by silent_poop · · Score: 5

    Is that like Milton from Office Space? Will Gordon be forever damned to wander the basement of Intel pondering the location of his stapler?

    --

    --

    --
    silence is poetry.
  92. Hand-counting scales just fine. by Flying+Headless+Goku · · Score: 1

    There is nothing about hand counting that makes it cost more than ten times as much for ten times as many voters. Whether you use people or machines, you still just end up with a number to be added into the district vote.

    The American problem is cheapskate locals who won't shell out for the work; a punch-card reader is cheaper than a bunch of guys counting votes and watching over each others' shoulders. The single most important government function is done on a tight budget.
    --

    --
  93. Sell Linuxgruven stickers? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Huh? What? I got a pile of "Linuxgruven" stickers from the Linux World Expo shows, but they most certainly didn't come from the "Linuxgruven" that's being sued - they all came from the people at http://www.linuxcare.com Which stickers are *you* talking about?

  94. Just fix the system by Agent+X-583 · · Score: 1

    On the issue of voting, you could really save everyone a lot of trouble by frying the electoral college, it's just screwing things up. It leaves thing anti-democratic and unfair to all voters, and offers a bonus to people living in certain areas by weighting their vote for more than other areas. On top of that, their have been times when the electoral college says someone is the winner, but if we had just done a dirrect vote, the opponent would have won (ex. US election in 1960).