Nice Browsing From Undead & Unknown Software Projects

metalhed77 writes: "A new version of the Nautilus file manager (1.0.4) has made its way out to the gnome ftps. here's the article on linuxtoday. It includes various improvements which are described on linux today, these primarily consisted of bug fixes and speed ups." Good to see that the effort that went into making Nautilus friendly wasn't wasted. But if you want to browse more than your hard drive, HeUnique points out another interesting project which is not distributed with the official KDE package. It's called: KDENOX ("KDE No X" -- you can use it with X or with framebuffer and QT Embedded: here's a screenshot). The gain? You get Konqueror without KDE, with SSL, cookies, proxy, bookmarks, fonts, and without KDE itself. The executable is small (4MB), doesn't take much RAM, and it works very nicely on low end machines ... (grab it from KDE CVS). Update: 07/08 01:17 AM by T : Here's a screenshot elsewhere; first person to mirror gets a lollipop.

Comments

Good thing they mentioned konq

[Anonymous Coward]

Hey look more news about gnome, we better spend most of the writeup talking about kde and konq

Lolly lolly lolly get yer screenshot here

[1010011010]

http://www.flyingbuttmonkeys.com/mirrors/galeon.pn g

and

http://www.flyingbuttmonkeys.com/mirrors/galeon.jp g


- - - - -

What I want in a browser.

[Faux_Pseudo]

Konq without X is cool but how about Netscape without X? You may ask yourself why. In order to access my bank online I have to use Netscape or IE. I am command line only at home and would love to have a framebufferd browser that is usable for this so I don't have to wait till I get to work and use one of their browsers. zen is a browser that will compile for gtk, qt or work from the framebuffer but its totaly useless for anything other than viewing a static page.

I want to see more development on command line only browsers to take advantage of older hardware or for people like myself who are GUI-impaired. One of the nice bennies of more development would be one could do $ getbankballence.sh | netscape --prompt4password. Now wouldn't that be cool in cron.

Some of the command line browsers out there, sorted by usefulness:

links

w3m

w3/emacs

lynx

zen

Re:konqueror does rule

[NNKK]

Personaly my complaint with linux browsers has always been, belive it or not, stability, not features.
This will of course improve with time, but as far as I can tell, IE5.5 is more stable than most or all web browsers avalible for linux
Netscape is unstable, I think everyone will agree, it's difficult to run it for more than a half hour or so without a segfault or other error.
Mozilla hasn't achived 1.0 yet, and Konq, though officialy 2.1, simply hasn't matured yet as far ast stability goes, though it is more stable than Netscape.
Opera I've generaly found to be very stable and very fast, though it's not under a GPL, GPL-compatible, or even Open Source compatible license (well, strictly speaking, neither is Netscape)

I haven't tried mozilla 0.9.2 yet, I've been hearing good things about stability, but I haven't gotten around to grabbing it yet, prehaps I should, but I doubt I'll be suprised, it'll probably be a lot more stable than earlier versions, but I doubt they've made it as stable as IE5.5 yet.

By now I can hear people yelling "Are you crazy?! IE crashes constantly!", well I'm here to tell you that contrary to popular opinion, it doesn't.
I've had it exhibit instability maybe a dozen times since version 5, which has been out for some time. It's outright crashed, *shrug*, maybe 6 or 7 times. This is in win98 and win2k, can't speak for win95, haven't used it since 98 was in beta.
IE simply is not the unstable peice of crap it was in 3.x and 4.x, it is a mature, stable product. Yes it's from Microsoft, and yes, it's responsible for a deluge of non-compliancy with standards, but it is STABLE.

(this'll probably get me modded down by the anti-microsoft zealots that refuse to accept that a microsoft product is superior to something else, I don't like Microsoft any more than you do, I'm simply informing the public that IE is not as unstable as people belive.)

Interesting stuff on KDENOX

[einhverfr]

My first thought was, "This would be great for those old 80486's I have laying around." However, then I realized an important shorcoming... On low end machines you can get advanced functionality by running X because the X server really serves out your display to various clients (usually programs on the same computer) and this can be used to set up thin clients with almost no hard drive, RAM, etc.

So it is not as useful as I first thought. However, it would be useful for setting up internet kiosks on low end machines. This could be useful where the machine's primary function is to access web pages and perform various console type applications. Particularly useful for libraries and schools, I would think...

Sig: Warning The following may be illegal under the DMCA (rot-13 decoder):
ABCDEFGH I JK LM

/. editors merely clever KDE trolls in disguise?

[tempest303]

Ok, I know this is a little petty, but is it just me, or does it seem like every time the Gnome or Mozilla projects do something cool, the /. editors posting the story just HAVE to mention Konqueror or KDE, especially in a context of "well, Mozilla is neat, but Konq can cure cancer, AIDS, and make your kid 25 IQ points smarter."

For all they talk about it, you'd think it has features like buttons for "Give head" and "Win Lottery." (Maybe those are in CVS?)