Slashdot Mirror


Gamecube: Launch Delayed, Logo Added

transient0 writes: "According to this article from Reuters, Nintendo Corp. has pushed back the U.S. launch of the Gamecube console by two weeks from November 5 to November 18. This means that the X-Box will be hitting U.S. shelves before the Gamecube does." Alec Muzzy adds: "Does anyone remember this article where Nintendo Executive Vice President, Peter Main, said '...Microsoft has announced November 8th as their launch date, but I don't think that's final. The GameCube will definitely launch on schedule though...' In a related story, the GameCube will now feature a logo from IBM."

72 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. IBM slogan? by Satai · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a related story, the GameCube will now feature a logo from IBM.

    GameCube: The only console that's guaranteed to kick your ass at Chess.

  2. The game machine I'm waiting for by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 2

    The Okamaaaaaaaaaaaa Gamesphere.

  3. No problem. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

    From the rumors, I think there's a good chance Microsoft will not have every X-box available at their launch that they'd hoped, so although this allows the folks in Redmond to steal a little of Nintendo's thunder, I don't think it'll have that much effect.

    On top of that, the Gamecube audience (pre-teens and older) and the X-box audience (older teens, young adults) are different, so this is more of a disappointment for that audience than it is a real problem for the GC's success.

    1. Re:No problem. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny
      this allows the folks in Redmond to steal a little of Nintendo's thunder
      Um, Nintendo of America is headquartered in Redmond, too...
    2. Re:No problem. by OmegaDan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its not about the system, its about the titles :)

      Bring back metroid, mega man and zelda and I'll buy a gamecube :)

      the console itself is just the theature the story is told at ...

    3. Re:No problem. by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mention folks from redmond stealing Nintendo thunder. IIRC, Nintendo's north america headquarters are also located in Redmond.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    4. Re:No problem. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      You mention folks from redmond stealing Nintendo thunder. IIRC, Nintendo's north america headquarters are also located in Redmond.

      Hehehehe... uh.. ah... oops. :)

      Yeah uhm...well...ahh... I mean those OTHER folks in Redmond... Not the ones with a really cool console coming out in November, but the ... wait a minute.

      *wild-eyed look*

      I CAN'T TELL THEM APART! All these corporations! They all look the same, look the same.... Can't... see... differences... Noooooo...

      *Rimbo burns Republican Party membership card, starts to read "Das Kapital"*

      Down with the bourgeois pigs! THE EVIL CORPORATISTS MUST FALL!!!

      *shakes head*

      Shit, sorry, I don't know what came over me there... *twitch, twitch*

    5. Re:No problem. by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      If I Recall Correctly
      Or Remember, i guess.

    6. Re:No problem. by Rimbo · · Score: 2

      Its not about the system, its about the titles :)

      Bring back metroid, mega man and zelda and I'll buy a gamecube :)

      the console itself is just the theature the story is told at ...


      True... I guess we'll all have to buy both of them!

    7. Re:No problem. by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 2, Funny
      If I Recall Correctly

      Or Remember, i guess.

      Or, as Iron Chef fans would have it, Watakushi no kioku ga tashika naraba...

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    8. Re:No problem. by Tet · · Score: 2
      the console itself is just the theature the story is told at ...


      Yep, and I prefer the plush fully upholstered
      surroundings of a real PC to the spartan backroom
      home projector of a console. While consoles
      stick with their style of controller, they'll never
      be able to play games like Angband, or even
      Serious Sam. For that reason alone, I'm sticking
      with my PCs. Now if only Croteam would do a Linux
      port...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  4. X-Box maybe... by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But the GameCube will be better..
    Sweet, sweet Mario Kart.

    I think that the X-Box is going to be a disappointment to a lot of PC Gamers anyway. They're going to realize their new console is the same as the Dell high end gaming box. Granted, it's a lot cheaper and has the TV out why the duplication? I'd be willing to bet that within a year of the release Microsoft will release the "XBox Center" or some other snazzy marketing name yielding the ability to play Xbox games on your PC.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    1. Re:X-Box maybe... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Given that Mario Kart 64 was pants, I don't know if extrapolating from that particular data point is a good idea. Super Mario Kart on the SNES, yes, awesome game.
      Within a year of release? OK you're on. My pound to your dollar.

    2. Re:X-Box maybe... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      So, what, you're saying it's better than Super Mario Kart?

    3. Re:X-Box maybe... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't doubt it if Microsoft released a "Windows GE". Geared towards gamers, played X-Box titles, was rock solid stable, didn't actually DO anything but play X-Box titles, but cost $199 (the same as an X-Box).

      Does this, or does this not sound exactly like something Microsoft would do (except for the rock solid stable part...)?

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    4. Re:X-Box maybe... by Quarters · · Score: 2

      It's not duplication to MS. It's an exit strategy from the DoJ's ongoing lawsuit.

      Make the X-Box a game console to get it into homes. People don't buy "internet appliances" and they don't buy WebTV. They do buy game consoles in droves, though. Consoles go beyond the reach of WebTV, TiVO, or PCs. Game consoles are almost ubiquitous.

      Microsoft got their TiVO knockoff in production to get the bugs ironed out of the program listing software and recording hardware.

      Microsoft Revamped MSN explorer to look good at lower res (640x480 or TV) res. They designed it full of NTSC safe colors and patterns.

      After the X-Box gets to a certain penetration point (3 million? 5 million?) I see MS simultaneously releasing the Ultimate TV HD recorder addition for it and the MSN Explorer software for it.

      BAM! In one fell swoop MS has gotten the biggest toehold ever in the "set top box" market. They control not only the content, but the most often used delivery mechanism for that content...your TV.

    5. Re:X-Box maybe... by stuce · · Score: 2

      I'd be willing to bet that within a year of the release Microsoft will release the "XBox Center" or some other snazzy marketing name yielding the ability to play Xbox games on your PC.

      No, the "XBox Center", or whatever it will be called, will let you do all the non-game things you need a computer for on the XBox. A USB keyboard and mouse, MS Office, IE, MSN, et al. This will be Microsofts dive into the home PC market. It has a hard drive so you can install 3rd party software. It has fixed hardware specs so Microsoft can focus on stable/fast drivers.

      It's cheap. It plays games like the best of em. It doesn't need a monitor. It's a full blown PC.

      Goodbye Dell, Gateway...

    6. Re:X-Box maybe... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Whoa. You're wierd.

    7. Re:X-Box maybe... by Xerithane · · Score: 2
      The only problem with that is that many people aren't going to want a full fledge computer in their living room.


      Keyboard, mouse - wireless maybe, but a pain in the ass to actually use looking at a TV (There are reasons why desks exist).


      It's great for your average email user and everything, but with the cost of "Budget PC's" now it doesn't matter. No matter what happens Microsoft gets paid... they're good at that.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:X-Box maybe... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Me? Oh, definitely not. I guess I should dig it out again one of these days though.

    9. Re:X-Box maybe... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      I don't think it can be done. The games will be build based on certain assumptions (harddrive, for one). I'm not sure what functionality they could take out of the Xbox hardware and still keep it compliant. If you look at what's actually costing you (and you consider that Microsoft is losing $150 (!) US on EVERY box), I really don't think they can manage a $199 box.

    10. Re:X-Box maybe... by John+Whitley · · Score: 2
      They're going to realize their new console is the same as the Dell high end gaming box.
      What, and that the GameCube is the "same" as a high-end Mac because it has a PowerPC chip? If someone is such a haaard-coooore PC gamer, why are they messing with consoles anyhow? Oh, yeah, stability and available game titles. Same as everyone else.

      BTW, I punted on a Dell system "recommended" for gaming. Excluding monitor and speakers, a Dimension 4100 comes to $1058. Personally, I have better uses for $759 than to give it to Dell.

      Oh, and since you haven't been following, the process of "porting" a game from XBox to Windows is not that far away from just recompiling plus a QA cycle. Moreover, what's the market motivation for MS? Not much, especially since MS then takes a large QA burden away from third-party developers and unto itself. Better to let the 3rd party devs do the easy port and pay for their own QA cycles.

    11. Re:X-Box maybe... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      Sorry about that, I meant "ALMOST" as much as an X-Box, not "the same as".

      The X-Box is $100 bucks stiffer... but at least it's a tangible product.

      Microsoft's $200 OS price point is just plain fraud.

      To the two replies who said this DOESN'T sound like something Microsoft would do -- I think you missed the point. It's EXACTLY the sort of fraud Microsoft would attempt.

      It's probably not technical feasible, but if Microsoft can sell you an overpriced product with limited functionality, they will. I mean, they've been doing it for years.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  5. Whoa - IBM = cheapest? by Brento · · Score: 3, Funny

    So let me get this straight: at launch time, the Sony one will still be $299, the Microsoft one will be $299, and the Nintendo one will be $199?!? That's got to be the first time in history that the box with the IBM logo had the lowest price.

    And on another note, I think this'll change that old slogan, "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM." I think if I expensed one of these, I'd have a hard time passing it off as an IBM part.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  6. They need the two weeks.... by MatrixManiac · · Score: 3, Funny

    To put the IBM labels on!!

    "We canna stick any faster Captain!"

  7. IBM and Geeks by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly IBM believes that todays geeks will be the decsion makers of tomorrow.

    A billion dollars in Linux research, now console gaming, what next,a /390 quake server?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Gamecube delay will not help Xbox by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    There are some big name, system-selling games for the Gamecube, most notably the latest Mario and Zelda titles. Nintendo showed only a few games at this past E3, but they were winners. I'd consider buying a Gamecube just to play them.

    Microsoft, well, they don't have much that's exciting game-wise, even if they do have the "better" hardware. Their showing at E3 turned off many people to the Xbox. There are some long awaited vaporware products, like Halo, but they could easily turn out to be not worth the wait (as is happening so often these days with games in development for three or more years).

    1. Re:Gamecube delay will not help Xbox by donglekey · · Score: 2

      The x-box won't have better hardware. The ATI 8500 coming with the gamecube is more powerful, and the 400 Mhz 128 RISC chip with a new architecture is sure to be faster than a PIII 700.
      Add to that HDTV support (for lower res standards), four controller ports, and balzingly fast load times, and the xbox comes out the looser cooparitivly once again.

    2. Re:Gamecube delay will not help Xbox by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      And it doesn't have a new architecture. It has the same PowerPC architecture thats been around for years.

      And there's something wrong with that?
      Clock for clock, PPC beats Pentium.

      Only 480p. Xbox supports up to 1024 I believe. TRUE HDTV support.

      By the time HDTV equipment gets cheap enough that I can afford it, both machines will be obselete.
      HDTV is a non-issue for me and most people I know.

      Oh and add proprietary, smaller, storage of the GC(N64 anyone?), no internet out of the box, and the realtime Dolby Digital features of the Xbox, and you can compare.

      Proprietary? I thought the GC's media was just a ~3" DVD...Are 3" 'CD Singles' "proprietary", too?
      Comparing the GC's optical technology to the N64's cartriges is bullshit. Apples and oranges.
      I don't have a home theater, so can't really say Dolby makes a shit of difference to me,
      it's gonna sound the same anyways.
      Yes, I have a ghetto A/V setup.

      I think the biggest flaw in your rebuttal was that you didn't consider two things: Games and price.
      The GC has Metroid, Zelda, Mario, Starfox, Rogue Leader and a bunch of other games in the works.
      The only games for Xbox I've seen that look interesting are (the vaporus) Halo, and DOA3.
      Nintendo's gameplay has always kicked ass, and I expect the same from the GC.
      Microsoft remains questionable in this area.

      Additionally, the GC is $100 less, meaning I can buy the system and a couple games for about the cost of an Xbox console alone.

      C-X C-S

    3. Re:Gamecube delay will not help Xbox by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but what about when you want to buy the hard drive + internet add-on from Nintendo?

      While I might buy the ethernet card, but I can't really fathom why I'd need a hard drive, except maybe for playing copied games without needing a DVD burner.
      With a well-designed format, an 8Mb FLASH card should be able to hold many, many savegames.

      And even so, it's easier for me to drop $200 on an impulse purchase, than $300.
      Xbox might be cheaper in the long run, but I'm usually more concerned with short term cost, as in "if I buy this will I still be able to make my car payment".

      C-X C-S

  9. Metroid by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    As long as Metroid is still going to be GameCube only, the delay shouldn't affect sales.

    Mmmmmm.... Metroid.....

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  10. No by wiredog · · Score: 2

    A beowulf cluster of /390 quake servers...

  11. Is this a big deal? by cnkeller · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The launch date was not the same date you could by this beast in a store. So in reality, it's only slipping by seven to ten days.

    On the other side of the coin, does this matter? How many people are of the opinion "I gots to get me a next generation game system now! I don't care which it is. Whoever is first to market gets my money."

    The reality of the situation is that if you were going to get an Xbox, you're still going to. If you were getting a Cube, you're still going to, just a week later. In this type of situation, first to market by a few days means very little.

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    1. Re:Is this a big deal? by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "In this type of situation, first to market by a few days means very little."

      I don't know. You'd think after the PlayStation/N64 debacle Nintendo would be scared shitless to release even a day late. They were very overconfident that their system could overcome any previous launches, and Sony got a good head of steam in the process.

      If I was Nintendo, I'd be trying to get this thing out on time, early if possible (which, of course, would never happen).

    2. Re:Is this a big deal? by cybrthng · · Score: 2

      If joe gamer has 299.00 burning his pocket and one system comes out before another and both are feature rich joe gamer will probably by one or the other and not both. So yes, it does affect the market. If xbox sells 4 million units the first month while the gamecube does 2 million then developers will hit the xbox because they have better percentages.

      Platform dependance is a thing of the past, most developers are agnostic now, WITH THE exception of gamecube developers.. so it could be just another repeat of n64.. with the exception of ibm vs sgi now.

    3. Re:Is this a big deal? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Too bad that Joe gamer with $299.00 in his wallet CAN'T buy an Xbox, since it's too bundled to get close to, and costs anywhere between $400 and $1200.

      Even if he COULD get just an Xbox, that's exactly what he'd have with $299.00. Just an Xbox. No games. At least with the GC, you're looking at the console and 2 games for the same price.

  12. One word by Pope · · Score: 2
    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:One word by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      At the time the graphics in halo, when they were first shown, were absolutely stunning, cutting edge and amazing considering at the time I had a Voodoo 2.

      Now I get better graphics than Halo on my Radeon with games which are already out. Looking at these screen shots again, they look horribly jagged. I think bungie missed the boat on this one.

      -- iCEBaLM

    2. Re:One word by Xerithane · · Score: 2
      Any good gaming company wont get forced by Microsoft to make them X-Box only. They still can do the PC (Windows based) market. Granted Microsoft can make their life difficult but as long as Microsoft is selling licenses for the SDK and boot sector on the CDs (I'm assuming XBox is running the modified wince (ouch) that Dreamcast was supposed to ship with) and they are selling licenses for their Windows based gaming platforms they're happy.


      It's a lot better for them to sell one XBox dev package + one Win dev package than only one or the other. I can imagine a lot of the people are going to buy both the console and PC version of the game.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:One word by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

      This isn't precisely true.

      According to Bungie, Halo will debut on the X-Box before being ported to both the PC and Mac. In fact, the first time most of us saw footage from the game was when it was shocased at Macworld.

    4. Re:One word by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      The DC did ship with WinCE. Or, more to the point, developers had the ability to use it.

      Consoles don't have an OS hardwired in; the OS boots when you put in the boot medium. On the DC, you could use, for lack of a better term, dcOS, or WinCE for Dreamcast. Whatever you burned to your CD would boot. and, say, DOA2 would use a later version of dcOS than Soul Calibur, cuz it came out later.

      WinCE for DC made for easy porting. One that leaps to mind is Virtua Cop (2, I think.)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:One word by donglekey · · Score: 2

      No one is going to buy a console for a game that they have never heard of before. I have seen 3 games I sort of want for the xbox (oddworld, halo, dead or alive 3) and about 15 games that keep me up at night for the gamecube (metroid, wave race, luigi's mansion, zelda, pikmin, eternal darkness, sonic, monkey ball, rogue squadron, 1080, mario kart, mario sunshine, starfox, super smash brothers, fifa, virtua striker, bomberman, madden 2002) the list goes on and on. There will be 15 games close to launch, and many more to follow, with lots and lots of franchise games. How can anyone doubt the gamecube will dominate?

    6. Re:One word by Xerithane · · Score: 2
      The Dreamcast SDK does not ship with WinCE standard. There are some games that use WinCE as the operating system. Microsoft had delayed on it and Sega gave up waiting for it and used their own operating system (or another vendors, not sure).


      Consoles do have bootloaders burned.. that is what you see when you turn it on without putting in a disc, etc. However, that pretty much is the extent of it. The discs contain the actual operating system (kernel and supporting libs) that gets booted.


      My point was that the Dreamcast was originally only going to use wince and if you produced a DC game it had to be on the wince platform. Since Microsoft fludged around so much Sega dropped them. I personally think that using WinCE + Direct3D is a better way to develop console games (I wish there was a stripped linux + GLX + SDL kit that was "mainstream" more) just for the purpose of portability. If you can use the same (mostly) libs for development on a console that you do for a PC porting becomes a breeze.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:One word by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Well, the Playstation 1 does run a small OS, it uses the first 64K of RAM, but it doesn't do much. I didn't spend much time with the Playstation 2 but it probably does something similar.
      The jazz of which you speak is just an application which gets copied from ROM by a small bit of code at boot-up time. The only thing done before running it is hardware initialisation.
      It's not an OS at all, it's just an application, that's the bottom line.

    8. Re:One word by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      My personal opinion is more power to em. It's called making money. Granted, Microsoft does a lot of unethical things I dont think that buying a company out and politely asking them (hehe.. right) to only support your platform is a bad thing. The vision gets clouded because of all the other stupid shit microsoft pulls.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    9. Re:One word by tc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because they made Mac games, which pretty much qualifies them as a non-profit organization :)

    10. Re:One word by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2

      According to Bungie, it isn't Microsoft's decision to make about what platforms Halo end up on. The only obligation they have to MS in that sense is to make sure it arrives for XBox first. If you believe the Bungie developers, they operrate pretty independantly within the MS corporation.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    11. Re:One word by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Bungie didnt have much of a choise about releasing Halo. They were bought by microsoft.

      Gee, Bungie had the choice on whether to sell to MS or not... I'd call that "much of a choise[sic]".

      -- iCEBaLM

  13. PowerPC inside by option8 · · Score: 2

    from the article linked:
    "Its PowerPC
    chips run devices ranging from
    television set-top boxes to mobile
    phones."

    which says nothing of the millions of Apple Macintosh computers the chips run as well (presuming this is the same PowerPC we're talking about.. it doesn't give model numbers).. does this mean all new Macs will have this "IBM Technology" logo on them, too? since they went to translucent plastic, the PowerPC logo has been absent

    nor does it mention anything about the fact that the chip is derived from the Power family of RISC chip designs, intended for use in IBM servers... or that the platform was co-developed by motorola for the desktop and embedded markets.

    i just thought i'd add my 2 cents (3 cents canadian) to the obviously lacking fluff on C|Net

    --hey! where's my sig?

    1. Re:PowerPC inside by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't source the PowerPC exclusively from IBM. All the G4s come from Motorola.

    2. Re:PowerPC inside by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      IBM and Motorola are competitors in the PowerPC market. C|Net was obviously just parroting the press release. Why would IBM mention their competitor?

    3. Re:PowerPC inside by firewort · · Score: 2

      Close, but not quite:

      IBM chips are used inside the iMac and iBook, and have been since at least the Summer of 2000.

      --

  14. How is that different? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    pre-teens and older seems to me to totally overlap older teens and young adults, in fact a wider range...

    Consider that one of the launch titles for the Gamecube is an amazing Star Wars:Rogue Squadron game. I'm past my 20's but I'm pre-ordering a Gamecube just for that - very targeted at the exact people who might be buying an XBox.I think advertising will really define who will come up on top - it's a matter of Nintendo convincing as wide an audience as possible to buy thier system, and Microsoft convincing as many people as possible that the new system has something great to offer.

    Of course, it will also be interesting to see what Sony does at the same time - will they sit silent and let Nintendo and MS beat on each other? Will they come out with a series of ads touting impressive new games like GT3 and MGS2 to try and steal some thunder?

    And the final question - will anyone have spare money at the end of the year to buy new systems, or will they all fall flat?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How is that different? by Rimbo · · Score: 3, Funny

      And the final question - will anyone have spare money at the end of the year to buy new systems, or will they all fall flat?

      Hey, that's what the $300 tax rebate is for, remember? :)

  15. Logo Added?? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was hoping they meant the cool little game with the turtle and the "go 25 / right 90" commands... drats.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  16. Re:You know somethings wrong when... by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

    It's only a couple of weeks, sure, but when it takes you from being a few days in front of Microsoft, to over a week behind, well that is significant.
    Only time will tell if it will be disastrous. Maybe Xbox will slip too. Who knows?

  17. Matsushita (12cm-disc capable) GameCube by Mandoric · · Score: 2

    Any word on the US release date for Matsushita/Panasonic's GameCube unit, or whether software will be able to use the extended area for FMV or possibly game data as well? One would imagine that if the extra data capacity (data capacity of the 8cm disc being used in the GC is ~1.5gb, whereas a single-layered 12cm DVD is ~4.5, double-layered ~8, and if one extrapolates density from 8cm and 12cm CD sizes, a 12cm GC data disc should be approximately 6gb...) was usable for software, this would make that version much the preferable system, even at a higher price... especially given that the sizes of some of the newer PSX RPGs are approaching 1.5gb.

    1. Re:Matsushita (12cm-disc capable) GameCube by be-fan · · Score: 2

      The more data you need to suck off of disk the longer the user waits. GameCube has 6:1 compression for textures which is supported directly by the graphics chip, not only decreasing load times, but also decreasing internal bus bandwidth needs. Or at least offsetting them to make room for more cool effects.
      If the extra space is needed I doubt it would be much more expensive to pack in two disks.

      In general though, I don't see why it would be needed. The GPU can make some pretty nice stuff realtime.
      >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>
      Oh, no, where'd we here this arguement before? All that's missing is the insistance that MIDI music will be "good enough."

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  18. Mac with IBM Logo? by trcooper · · Score: 2

    Could we someday see a Mac with an IBM Technology logo on it? I've heard there's a possibility that Apple may use IBM chips at some point, and they already use some IBM drives. Wouldn't that be something to behold? It'd really confuse the folks who still use the term IBM Compatable.

    1. Re:Mac with IBM Logo? by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 2, Informative
      Dude, they do use IBM chips. PowerPC chips were developed by the AIM (apple, IBM, motorotla), and based on IBM's POWER chip alliance. The 601 to g3 chips are made by both Motorola and IBM. The new G4 chip is made only by IBM due to disagreements between the three companys. The GameCube however uses a Gekko chip, that is based off (iirc) the g3 series PowerPC Chip (it might be another series of PPC, i dont rember).
      And, if you paied attention...the "PowerPC" name and logo are (tm) IBM. I dont know why apple took the logo off of their computers, but they have. I can only assume they'll go back on at a later date.

      P.S. Apple mostly uses Maxtor and Segate drives, due i beleive to lower prices. I have not seen a Mac with an IBM drive in it (that i didnt put there) in a long time.

      --
      The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  19. How about some more info! by winter@ES · · Score: 2, Informative
    This news all comes from the SpaceWorld conference, Nintendo's biggest games conference (only for Nintendo and 3rd party Nintendo developers) held in Japan this week/weekend.

    For coverage, check out:

    Gamespot's SpaceWorld Coverage

    IGN's GameCube site

    Most impressive to me is the footage of the new Mario and Zelda games. While lots of other developers worry about targetting the "cool" gamers, the "hardcore" gamers, Nintendo seems to be the one of the only ones focusing on the FUN in their games, and targetting the kid in all of us (as well as the real kids among us.) ;-) That's going to be the factor that wins them the #1 position in the upcomming console wars, in my opinion. This focus on pure fun is evident in their entire GameCube and Game Boy Advance lineup.

    paulb

    --

    Paul Bettner

    Game Developer et al

  20. IBM's Second Game Console by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny
    IBM actually was the OEM for.....


    wait for it.....


    the Atari Jaguar! .



    The fisrt batches was made by IBM and the later ones by Comptronix.

    Atari Press Release:
    ATARI AND IBM ANNOUNCE STRATEGIC MANUFACTURING CONTRACT FOR MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM

    SUNNYVALE, Calif. -- June 28, 1993 -- Atari Corp. announced today that it has contracted with the IBM Corp.'s Charlotte, N.C., facility to manufacture the Atari Jaguar, Atari's new 64-bit multimedia entertainment system.

    IBM's multi-year contract is valued at $500 million.

    The Atari Jaguar, to be made in the United States, is an interactive multimedia entertainment system which features over 16 million colors in 24-bit true color graphics and produces shaded 3-D polygons for manipulation in a "real world" in real time. A 32-bit expansion port will allow for future connection into cable and telephone networks, a digital signal processing port for modem usage and connection to digital audio peripherals. The Jaguar will also feature a double-speed compact disc peripheral.

    "This system is clearly the wave of the future," said Sam Tramiel, president of Atari. "Because the Jaguar will feature such an array of visual and audio special effects, we wanted to work with a premier company that we are confident can manufacture the quality product we have developed."

    The Charlotte-based IBM plant, which for 15 years has manufactured and developed products only for other IBM businesses, just recently began working with outside companies to meet their production needs. The Atari Jaguar project represents one of IBM's first entries into manufacturing for the mass consumer electronics market.

    "This is a wonderful opportunity to work with Atari and their new system," said Herbert L. Watkins, director of Application Solutions manufacturing at IBM Charlotte. "Everyone expects IBM to manufacture complex information technology products, and with this, we'll show that we can competitively build a sophisticated consumer product."

    In addition to assembling the Jaguar, IBM will be responsible for the component sourcing, quality testing, packaging and distribution. The Jaguar, announced on June 3, is based on an Atari-designed proprietary 64-bit RISC processor that features four times the technology currently seen in the marketplace today. The sound system is based on Atari's proprietary, high-speed, Digital Signal Processor dedicated to audio which can produce CD-quality sound. The Atari Jaguar will be available on a limited basis in the fall, focusing on the New York market. A national roll-out is expected next year, and the Jaguar will retail for approximately $200.

    NOTE: Atari Corp. manufactures and markets personal computers and video games for the home, office and educational marketplaces throughout the world. Atari headquarters are located at 1196 Borregas Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94089.

    The IBM Corp.'s Charlotte facility manufactures and develops for IBM and other companies a wide variety of products, such as banking systems, automotive diagnostic systems and electronic circuit boards. The site includes 2.3 million square feet of work space on a 1,200-acre site. Its address is 1001 W.T. Harris Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28257. Telephone: 704-594-1000

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  21. Inside the GameCube by K4GPB · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nintendo's GameCube :
    Photos show how gamers will eventually have the choice of a 56K modem or a broadband modem and
    2 slots for 4-Mb Digicard flash memory cards or a 64-MB SD-Digicard adapter. The biggest change that Nintendo has made between the Nintendo 64 and the GameCube is that the GameCube will be the first Nintendo console not to use game cartridges. The GameCube will use small proprietary discs.

  22. paul rand would puke. by option8 · · Score: 2

    the logo they're plastering on these things is awful. Paul Rand would puke.

    sure it's the right blue (maybe - web colors suck for ID standards) and there are the stripes, but gradients and dropshadows? on a logo?

    okay, so i don't play the part of design nazi very well, but i did have the logo usage standards drilled into my head when i worked at Big Blue, and it sucks to see them ogilvy-and-mathered. yarf.

  23. For what it's worth.... by Kibo · · Score: 2

    I saw a news story about GameCube a week or so ago, and they said it supported HDTV at 1080 out of the box, and Microsoft will have HDTV support as an extra add on. That said. I'll never waste my money on another Nintendo product. I don't know yet if I'll waste it on one from Microsoft. But MS, if ya hadn't noticed has acquire a few game companies in the past couple of years. More over they've developed some brands of their own, Age of Empires, their sports series. Not to mention Sega will be developing games for all three of the boxes. I've seen stuff about Xbox getting a new grand theft auto, and crazy taxi. That sure as hell appeals more to me than anything with Mario.

    The killer app I would buy either of them for on the spot would be a tight Macross game.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:For what it's worth.... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      I've seen stuff about Xbox getting a new grand theft auto, and crazy taxi. That sure as hell appeals more to me than anything with Mario.

      Actually, I've read (unconfirmed) reports that the GC will have a Crazy Taxi port.

      C-X C-S

    2. Re:For what it's worth.... by Kibo · · Score: 2
      I care little for anything brandishing a shiny new Star Wars logo. I care little for the continued unoriginal adventures of link. As a general rule I don't even like RTS. Hmm.


      I long to recapture the joy I found in Bandit Kings of Ancient China, and have considered picking up a PS2 just for this reason. I would love to play a game spectacular enough to be worthy of the Macross title. I liked Crazy Taxi, GTA2 was moderately entertaining. A Ranma 1/2 fighting game would probably be fun with friends. But most of all, I long for a truly excellent football (USA centric version) game with which I can lead the Seattle Seahawks to their richly deserved glory. (Yes I know they'll probably go 8-8 this year).

      Nintendo has shown no intrest in MY intrests. I know, I even had a piece of shit N64. Hell I still have it. They really only care about the kids. Why not. They decided not to focus on me, and to instead focus on the parents of pre and early teens. Sega and Sony seem to want my buisness more. Maybe Microsoft will. But honestly, Rogue Squadron, while the graphics are pretty is far from revolutionary. As for Zelda, if I want to play a cartoon, I'll play one done with a snazzy post process filter where you can tag attack helicopters outta the air. Jet Grind Radio? Damn skippy.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  24. Re:Mario Kart bugs by Xenex · · Score: 2

    Poor Kamek.

    He was in the early N64 Mario Kart screen shots, but then was dumped for Wario (I didn't agree either; Wario is a crappy knock-off Game Boy charcter, Kamek is a cool 'make-things-big-now' magic guy from Yoshi's Island).

    I doubt he'll be back though. But, you make the petition, I'll sign it (and make sure you ask for the koopa troopa back too... ;)

    (Pinocchio, however... why?!)

    This post brought to you by killing time between lectures...

  25. Re:Too Bad by Xenex · · Score: 2

    Sega did get in bed with Microsoft, however, to get WinCE ported to the Dreamcast.

    Sure, MS got it too them so late they only had it as an optional extra to developers, but, it was still there...

    So, Sega have slept with Evil Software Corp...

    (And, before anyone asks, I don't know how two large companies sleep together. ;)

  26. Re:GAMECUBE's capabilities relative to Xbox by Xenex · · Score: 2

    However, GameCube media is cheap, so multiple disk games would be a viable option to companies wanting to release games larger then 1.5G.

    Sqaure used multiple CD's for some (all?) the Final Fantasy games on the PlayStation, so this won't be anything new for the industry.

  27. HDTV... by Thag · · Score: 2
    By the time HDTV equipment gets cheap enough that I can afford it, both machines will be obselete. HDTV is a non-issue for me and most people I know.


    Take another look in the video store. HDTVs are down to $1500 US for a widescreen picture tube model (a nice Panasonic Tau model). I expect sub-$1000 models by next year.

    That's cheap enough that I'm beginning to plan how I'll be making the jump.

    The issue for me is not so much the HDTV, but figuring out the best way to build a system around it.

    And, FWIW, broadcast HDTV doesn't even enter into the equation for me. It's all about home theater, where an HDTV utterly kills anything NTSC. After watching DVDs on my 19" computer monitor at HDTV resolution, I can never go back!

    Jon Acheson
    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:HDTV... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      Until I can get one for under $300, I'm not gonna bother. I've got better things to waste my money on.

      I can watch DVDs on my computer at high rez, and that's fine for me, I don't use my TV enough to make HD cost-effective, not to mention I don't even have space for a TV larger than 19".
      I might buy a HDTV decoder card for my machine right now, provided they were available and cheap enough (Under $300, again), but that's about it. I don't see myself buying anything HD related for at least 3 years.

      What would be super l33t is if the GC had a RGB out port and a SVGA adaptor...

      C-X C-S