Slashdot Mirror


Working Nerve Chip

poetic writes: "Two scientists from Munich have succeeded in creating a nerve chip with silicon and snail nerves. The cells were hindered from growing away from the silicon with a plastic fence. They managed to get a signal to go from silicon through a neural circuit and back to the chip again. Cute, one step closer to a decent uplink! See the abstract at Nature's site."

99 comments

  1. Broad band Shmodband! by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we think were adicted to broadband!!!
    Heck right now I can't find a place to eat without the internet, and now were getting this much closer to wireing ourselves into the network.

    Can you imagine what having SlashDot on the brain will be like once this technology get's some where? (of course we'll need a better way to get rid of flame bait)

    Of course then MS will come out with Windows '84 and it will only crash your mind once in a while... "Passport for your brain! It's just not for violating your financial privacy any more!!"

    1. Re:Broad band Shmodband! by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The idea of connecting my brain to the net is fascinating, but I can't imagine it being a usable technology within my lifetime. We still don't really have much skill with artifical neural networks, let alone the knowledge it would take to figure out how to get abstract information into a human brain. . .

      In the near future, I see this technology as being more usable in fields related to bionics; I don't know a whole lot about the capabilites we could get from a microchip being linked directly to neurons, but I can imagine that it would provide a person much greater control of artifical limbs, and help a lot with artificial sensory organs. We have a rudimentary understanding of how the visual cortex works, so regrettably I have a feeling that the first widescale applications of this technology will be in attempts to link digital cameras to the brains of blind people or the like.

      Even when we finally figure out how to get abstract ideas into peoples' heads, I imagine something much greater than the Net - I am thinking of a system where all the knowledge of the world is available to a person in a similar way to that of their long-term memory, so that if I wanted to "remember" how to use some obscure API call or somesuch, a hundred years in the future, all I would have to do is think about it, and the chip would link into a network of somesuch and pump the knowledge straight into my brain, as if I had always known what it is I was trying to find out.

    2. Re:Broad band Shmodband! by guttentag · · Score: 2, Funny
      The phenomenon known as "slashdotting" would become a crime punishable by death in Texas:

      "The governor is calling for the arrest and prosecution of some 500 people around the world for the mortal slashdotting of a Houston software engineer."
    3. Re:Broad band Shmodband! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This much advancement in human to machine interfaces and the thought of connecting all the brains together to form one vast network is fairling interesting. Soon we will have a true Borg network and conquor worlds on end... Neato! =)

      Hrm.. lets see here... we won't have to deal with raceism (Everyone will be assimilated). We won't have to worry about a money system (What would zombies do with money?). We can make that neat voice of everyone talking together (Great for intimidating the enimies). And who needs privacy? *grins evily* Oh, there are many things this could bring for the sake of man kind.....

      -misspeler

    4. Re:Broad band Shmodband! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had that shit in the 80's, dude. This guy could do all sorts of shit like leap over fences and crush iron bars, and if he gave you the evil eye, don't take it personally, he's actually using super vision to look into your inner soul. Problem is, everytime he used his bionic parts they'd make noises like ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch when he ran or bent shit, and boo-boo-boo-boo-boo when he used his vision -- kind of hard to work as a secret agent when you can be heard coming a mile away!

    5. Re:Broad band Shmodband! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We can make that neat voice of everyone talking together

      Actually, there are few things more terrifying that a pack of humans in a forest all screaming at once, especially if it's dark and they're all around you. It's much scarier, and louder, than a wolf pack with the same number of members. It sounds really unearthly, like a sound effect from Aliens.

      - I'd say that a large pack of prehistoric humans screaming as they move in for the kill would have scared the shit out of virtually any other animal, up to and including a herd of elephants.

  2. Amazing, yet scary by thesolo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This is very frightening, actually. Think about if we keep developing AI, and these chips follow. Couldn't it essentially develop to the point where computer circuits could control our OWN cells? Or am I the only one who thinks about these things?!

    Maybe the Luddites were right after all.

    1. Re:Amazing, yet scary by keesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I'd really like would be to have a CPU in my arm. Not for real thought -- too complicated just now -- but for the odd maths test it'd be extremely useful...

      Of course, it'd have to be something slow -- could you imagine a human with cooling fans stuck all over them?

    2. Re:Amazing, yet scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or we could offload some of our body's systems to machines. It comes to the same thing either way and I really don't think it's to be feared. I am ALOT more affraid of what governments and other power-mongers will do with advanced tech in efforts to maintain and expand their influence than I am of what some machine inteligence might do someday.

      Mankind is, and will be for the forseeable future, it's own worst enemy.

    3. Re:Amazing, yet scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have our own cooling system, which happens to be mostly water :-)

    4. Re:Amazing, yet scary by tim_maroney · · Score: 2

      What I'd really like would be to have a CPU in my arm.

      Wouldn't it be better just to have an implanted interface, and have the actual processing unit be linked by wireless? The power requirements of a wireless interface are less demanding than a whole CPU, so you'd have to plug yourself in much less often. It would also be a lot easier to upgrade the CPU if it were external.

      Tim

    5. Re:Amazing, yet scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I want to be stuck with a 486-SX for the rest of my life. No exceptions!

    6. Re:Amazing, yet scary by Jarvinho · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This, ahem, "experiment" has already been attempted in Britain by the notorious Kevin Warwick, a professor in the Cybernetics Dept. at the Univ. of Reading. Basically, he implanted a silicon chip "transponder" under the skin of his forearm. When he passed by certain equipment- it recognised the transponder and performed certain actions e.g. walking up to a door in the lab would cause the door to open. The cynical amongst us might point out that having the transponder in yuor pocket would cause exactly the same action, and wouldn't require surgery...


      His next experiment was similar but involved attaching the transponder to the epineurium (sheath) of one of the nerves of the arm- the idea was that the transponder would pick up signals (eg the axonal activity caused by touch sensation, or pain) and then that these signals could be sent to a computer and encoded as "patterns" (eg one pattern for holding a pen, one pattern for being pricked by a pin). These patterns could then be analysed and even sent back to the transponder, where it could now act as an output device, and cause the sensation that was encoded! There was even talk of implanting Prof. Warwick's wife with an identical transplant and putting them in continual communcation, so that for example, when Warwick stroked a kitten, his wife would hae the sensation of kitten-stroking.


      Not surprisingly for those of us that have neurological/neuroscientific training, the results from this study have never seen the light of day. The ideas are flawed from top to bottom. Warwick's main mistake is that his second experiment has no relation to the first. The first (having a transponder that identifies individuals) is marginally interesting, if overblown (the transponder doesn't have to be surgically implanted to work) - his idea is "The chip implant technology has the capability to impact our lives in ways that have been previously thought possible in only sci-fi movies. The implant could carry all sorts of information about a person, from Access and Visa details to your National Insurance number, blood type, medical records etc., with the data being updated where necessary."


      Im sure fellow /. readers find that scary rather than necessary!


      Anyway, that "experiment" (more like a beta test) doesnt logically lead to the second nerve implant. His lack of elementary neuroscience is evident here- peripheral nerve trunks are not good places to encode data- and if he did manage to "record" patterns for himself - how could he "play" them back on his nerves? A simple magnetic transponder? It would be like trying to email a GIF to someone by holding an industrial elctromagnet next to a bundle of phone-wires! And the thought that recorded patterns could be played back on another person's CNS using such crude technology is simply unbelievable.


      Professor Warwick is regarded as something of a quack in the UK high-tech/neuro community, as this site, Kevin Warwick Watch, testifies. His research, however, does raise one or two interesting questions. His techniques and methods, though, are nopthing more than circus sideshows, compared to the excellent work with the mollusc neurons.

      --

      Tonight the sky is empty. But that is nothing new

    7. Re:Amazing, yet scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are "the only one who thinks about these things?!" The rest of us are busy plotting your downfall. We really are out to get you.

      ...Fool!

  3. hmm the morals of this are a little err... lacking by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

    poor little slug.

    anyone watch that doggy film where they grapht(sp) a dead kids brain into a video game to up the AI...

    I can see it now...
    AI Chip from Cyrix (a bit of a slug)
    AI Chip from MS (a small child)

  4. An important step up by Zergwyn · · Score: 4, Informative
    Recently researchers successfully linked up a couple of leach neurons to silicon, but while the connections worked it was not an actual chip. This is a step up on the complexity scale.

    Leach neurons and those of other critters are useful to experiment with because they are very large, especially in comparison to most mammals. This makes it much easier to connect them to electronics. It will probably be a while before we see anything with people, because the connections must be so tiny. It seems likely though that as nanotech and neuroscience advance, this field will become one of the hottest in science.

    1. Re:An important step up by h0rus · · Score: 1

      Would this be similar in technique to that used on the TNG era Enterprise? With those 'Bio-Paks' or whatnot that handle the systems?

    2. Re:An important step up by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      You're confusing Voyager with the Enterprise. The notion of "gel-paks" as they're called wasn't introduced until Voyager.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
  5. Done before... by cirby · · Score: 1

    A group of researchers in Texas did the same thing with mouse neurons about twelve years ago.

    1. Re:Done before... by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

      URL please?

      That would be intresting to read about...

    2. Re:Done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad it was a failure :(

    3. Re:Done before... by cirby · · Score: 1

      Here's the current address of the folks who have been doing this: The current pages don't have the same info, but they've been getting info in and out of nerves for a long time now:

      http://www.cnns.org/

  6. Nerve chips will host AI. by Mentifex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The artificial Mind at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mind/ is currently housed in silicon but will be a natural inhabitant of these nerve chips as we approach the Technological Singularity.

    1. Re:Nerve chips will host AI. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the cyber-revolution comes, you will be first against the wall, mortal.

    2. Re:Nerve chips will host AI. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er but that's in windoze !! does that mean even the artificial brain will have to get a passport ;-)

  7. Remember the Outer Limits by Ghoser777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I remember seeing an episode once where this scientist was kind of a dork in every sense, and then he created these computer like antibodies that would be able to attack any bad thing that entered the body. This was great at first, as he remained healthy, and then his physical fitness also seemed to improve. Well, then these antibodies went a little nuts and started making other improvements in the body: like after he went swimming, her developed gills. Then I remember after he tried to kill himself, his body created sporers to protected himself from hurting his body. And then he blew up a lab and killed himself.

    Yeah, this is as much scifi as the article says the end use of these guys are, but the more we have computeresque things in our body, the more scared I get.

    F-bacher

    P.S. Oh yeah, and that guy had sex with his gf and she got pregnant, so the antibodies passed on to her. Dun dun da!

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Remember the Outer Limits by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      OT but, Yeah that was a good one. except of course they were not 'antibodies' but 'nanomachines'. As if Y-shaped protein epitope recognition molecules could do that

    2. Re:Remember the Outer Limits by Vuarnet · · Score: 2

      Well it looks like that episode was based on Greg Bear's Blood Music, a sci-fi story dealing with MAB's - Medically Applicable Biochips. in that story, they MABs are "microscopic logic circuits which can be injected into the human body to troubleshoot".

      He also developed this story into a novel, which I haven't read yet, so i can't say much about it.

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Remember the Outer Limits by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      The bad guy in that episode was Denis Leary >:)

      Actually, this story reminded me more of the episode where there was a worldwide wireless "internet", but it talked directly to human brain via neural methods. Apart from the handful of people who were unreceptive to it, everybody could just download information to the brain whenever they wanted. Dont know how to speak French? zzzip.. learned.

      As it happened, the system got a virus that started killing people with information overload , and the "retards" that were unreceptive to it managed to save the day by getting in and fixing the system (and discovering true love at the same time, or something).

  8. Waste by Herstel · · Score: 3, Funny

    The chip's cells will need food. Therefore the chip will produce some waste, we'll need odour eliminators. "CountryBouquet air freshener" by AMD.

    1. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I was just talking to my cube mate. I though connectig the computer to disposal. It feeds on the waste from dinner and every couple of days you replace a waste bag. So you will have to "change" your computer. THink of when you computer "dies". You come home and there is this stink....

  9. It has to be said... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You will be assimilated...
    resistance is futile!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:It has to be said... by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 2

      Yeah, no one tell stephen hawking, ok?

    2. Re:It has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever mod this off-topic is a totally clueless moron.

  10. I think I would sign up for trials by JeremyYoung · · Score: 1

    If they had medical trials for integrating human thought with a data stream, I think I might honestly consider signing up.

    --

    Go Lakers!

  11. Why can't /. editors proof read before posting? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1
    I think they word Timothy was looking for was decent, not descent.

    1. Re:Why can't /. editors proof read before posting? by Ghoser777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, #2248298 says the same thing your post does, and it was posted 2 minutes bfore yours according to the time stamp. So I guess that would make your post redundant.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:Why can't /. editors proof read before posting? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That doesn't matter. He hit upon something anyway, direct brain control is the only way you can play Descent properly...

  12. One step closer to the BORG by 1nt3lx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I guess it would be a really effective form of Communism. I wouldn't mind if 4 billion others could instantaneously help me debug a malfunction with one my finger's servos.
    Actually, once we're able to forcably remove thoughts from each other's heads who will need computers? I mean, aside from the computers implanted into our flesh.

    Not physical wealth, in this utopia, but informational wealth. Unlike the internet which requires some idea of destination, all the knowledge of the entire species available, searchabe, catalogued, and prepackaged for each of the human nodes in a giant beowulf cluster.

    Riker should have submit himself.

    1. Re:One step closer to the BORG by Ghoser777 · · Score: 1

      Here's why this is bad:

      1. Loss of all privacy (you can't disconnect from this net unless you get captured by Picard)

      2. Loss of all freedom. Because all your actions are triggered by thoughts from your brain, all of your actions could be preempted by the rest of the world. That sounds great for stoppin crime, but aweful for people who break from social norms

      3. Propogation of viruses. You thought the internet was bad at doing this. Remember when Picard infected Hue with those non-Borgian thoughts? That almost screwed up the Borg's entire existence.

      People can probably think up some more.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:One step closer to the BORG by sydb · · Score: 1

      I take your point about viruses, but privacy and freedom? Desire for those is just a side-effect of being humble individuals. Borg members will have no such flaws.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  13. Just Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's EVOLUTION, baby!

    Just imagine, we could actually be able to get raped by a company when we're not even there.

  14. Arrrgh ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want this emotion chip anymore !

  15. Is that internally consistent? by joedoe · · Score: 0

    From the post, emphasis added:

    Cute, one step closer to a descent uplink!

    How does that work, exactly?

    --joedoe

  16. nice start - but locutus is long off. by Emil+Muzz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is certainly a nice start to what could be a promising field, but there are so many things to be dealt with before we could realistically use any technology like this for clinical purposes (ie: borg implants). Namely, if these were to be used in longer nerves (anything in the spine for example) they would have to come up with a way of dealing with myelinated nerve cells, not just bare cells. Myelin is a sheath that covers nerves to increase speed of signal transduction, and piercing it (with a chip interface) could lead to problems in propagating an action potential... However, this stuff looks like it has serious promise for starting research into "biological computing"

    --
    ... not in here, pal, this is a mercedes...
  17. Hasn't this been done..? by Ariston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw a documentary on TLC a while ago about AI and such, and they mentioned a group of scientists who had done something similar to this. They were pretty vague about the whole thing but these people had basically taken a small clump of nerve cells (I want to say they were human brain cells, but I'm not sure...) and put them on this chip that would monitor their outputs and provide inputs. They had connected the whole thing to this computer which simulated a very simple 2D (pseudo-3d, kinda like Wolfenstein) environment, and trained the cells to move around in the virtual "world", avoiding walls and obstacles.

    It's sounded pretty far out...has anyone else heard of anything like this?

    --
    --Ariston
    "I'm never wrong--sometimes reality just disagrees with me."
    1. Re:Hasn't this been done..? by plastik55 · · Score: 2
      I saw a documentary on TLC a while ago about AI and such, and they mentioned a group of scientists who had done something similar to this. They were pretty vague about the whole thing but these people had basically taken a small clump of nerve cells (I want to say they were human brain cells, but I'm not sure...) and put them on this chip that would monitor their outputs and provide inputs. They had connected the whole thing to this computer which simulated a very simple 2D (pseudo-3d, kinda like Wolfenstein) environment, and trained the cells to move around in the virtual "world", avoiding walls and obstacles.

      You mean Steve Potter's group at Caltech. And they are rat brain cells BTW.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  18. Interesting....but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it uses snail nerves, wont the chip be slow?

  19. It was from a lamprey by blach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading about this experement, and what they had done is taken the "brain mass" from a lamprey (a jawless fish with an incredibly simple nervous system). Pretty interesting that just a little bitty hunk of cells could navigate around in the computer. Since a lamprey has but one very simple "eye" it was probably fairly simple to feed in the visual input.

    Regards
    James

  20. But the only problem is... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two scientists from Munich have succeded in creating a nerve chip with silicon and snail nerves.

    But the only problem is the slowness of the propagation.


    Next year, they are going to try the same experiment with rabbit nerves, to see if there is a speed improvement.

    1. Re:But the only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crack smokin mod
      amusing mebe
      not informative

    2. Re:But the only problem is... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      If they use rabbit nerves, it will make a beeline for the internet and connect to pr0n, instead of doing anything practical

    3. Re:But the only problem is... by sydb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Um... informative?

      I laughed, but I was not informed. Moderators?

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    4. Re:But the only problem is... by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      With just 2 rabbit nerves it can perform a MUL.

    5. Re:But the only problem is... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      ...but after multiple glitches with the rabbit nerves, working tourtise nerve connections will be completed first.

    6. Re:But the only problem is... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      And thereafter with bioengineered nerves, trying to emulate Moore's Law? Or perhaps just speed up the chips and let the nerve connections alone...

      Though, I wonder...what if one were to use this to replace natural neurons, one by one, and only speed up the neurons that had been replaced (and only when a large group of connected neurons, like the part of the brain that processes symbols, has been replaced)?

  21. A.I.-internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is, if all humans and computers were neuro-electronically connected, would the loss of individualism and seperate perspectives make the world more productive or less productive because there is no conflict and seperate takes to encourage creativity? And, ofcourse, would humans become obsolete?

    1. Re:A.I.-internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck could such an intelligent comment be moded down. This is a brilliantly thought out question. Does collectivity limit the number of viewpoints and alternative solutions to any given problem (is what it can be summed up to). The answer can be given in trends, and the teenage youth culture of 1st world-countries. It's quite simple to see that a group tends to repress any idea not considered cool. And many times "coolness" can be defined as an action with a certain degree of randomness and unpredectablity. What this leads to is illogical ideas and actions becoming desirable to commit. Now, if we were linked not just by friendship, but by actual mental sharing... at first, this could be a major boon to humanity. But then the benefit starts averaging out.. and stupid people join the collective. The lowest common demoninator will always prevail in a collective usually. I believe this could eventually lead to a mass loss of intelligence, as the ideas of those who enjoy life the most (generally the ignorant) begin to over-rule those of us who once "Think Different" but now as a collective, such is impossible. In conclusion, become Mac users.

  22. Brain Interface by anethema · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've always dreamed of having a computer interface with the breain directly, overriding the senses so as to make a virtual world. Imagine playing a photorealistic quake 3 or unreal tournament with you IN the game, shooting people. Or an RPG where you actually talk to people and gather information. I am 20 years old now, and i doubt i will see TRUE virtual worlds in my lifetime, but i can always dream. I wonder if this 'nerve interfacing' is the first step into doing what i wish. Maybe i should be a biology researcher and help out. (riiight.)

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:Brain Interface by sydb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've thought about that for years too... then the Matrix came out... and now the dream looks more like a nightmare.

      Readers of Carlos Castaneda's books should probably sympathise.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:Brain Interface by cdalemx · · Score: 1

      nah you will probably see it in your life time. . just look at how longer old people are living today, which implyes older people will live even longer latter on or at least long enogh to the point where older takes on slightly diffrent deffention. .> anyway. . yea .. we are not too far off, as the interface evolves we come closer to what you speek, already we see people spening more time in virtual worlds then in the real, ask any everquest user, does it really matter if the interface is compleatly overiding the senses?

  23. Interesting focus.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm actually surprised at the fact that the article focused on prosthetic implants (ie into the brain) as one of the primary benefits of this technology. Many of us on /. followed with similar thoughts. However, I see other applications to be much closer on the horizon. While we have a long way to go before we can start wet-wiring silicon to our brains, I think we could use this technology for artificial limbs much sooner. Theoretically, it should be possible to build entirely eltromechanical limbs that have the ability to transmit feeling -- hot and cold, pressure, pain, etc. Being able to connect electronic sensors in these limbs to actual nerve tissue is the missing link. In cases where a limb truly could not be attached, this would be the next best option. Any speculation on how long it will be?

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    1. Re:Interesting focus.... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      I did my Master's thesis on exactly that, back in '96. It was possible then. (One of my professors went further: back in the '60s, she wired up a cat's audio nerves to a radio transmitter, then listened to the signals. With minimal modulation, she was able to hear what the cat heard.) It's interesting to see the work being done, but this isn't as much of a breakthrough as some people think. The breakthrough was learning that nerves carry signals that can be electrically measured and generated. Once that was done, the main requirement is someone brave enough to wire up severed neurons in a living being to a mechanical limb and sensors.

      That said, this research - and its publicity - will hopefully alert people that the tech is available, and thus maybe inspire someone to try.

  24. This reminds me of Cordwainer Smith. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    He wrote about laminating animal brains into silicon for use in robots and such.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  25. hmm has anyone ... by anshil · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... already patented the 10base-T Interface on the human body? Hmm I guess I'll immediatly rush to the patent office, and get also USB, Firewire and for the sake of it good old RS232 for direct humanoid interfacing.

    Remember you don't have to bring a proof of work to patent something, just have to wait somebody else does.

    Maybe the man-page will get a new meaning in the future?

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  26. Kevin Warwick by Kraft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If this has your interest, UK professor Kevin Warwick definatly will. He had a chip implanted in 1998, making him a cyborg (not the first though). He researches robotics and decided to get the implant for a week or so, which communicated with the university where he worked through a radio link (his story in Wired).

    THIS year, he is taking it to the next step. "Project Cyborg 2.0":
    This phase will look at how a new implant could send signals back and forth between Warwick's nervous system and a computer. If this test succeeds with no complications, a similar chip will be implanted in his wife, Irena. This will allow the investigation of how movement, thought or emotion signals could be transmitted from one person to the other, possibly via the Internet.

    I heard on BBC, where he was interviewed, that he wanted to find out, if they could transfer/share pain, he and his wife. Interesting stuff.

    What I personally find cool about Kevin (yes, he is a first name kinda guy ;) is that he is doing this on himself. There are actually health risks involved in the operation, which is why he chose to get it in his left arm, as he is right-handed. I guess someone would argue that it's unscientific experimenting on yourself, rather than a test subject, but for me it shows how much he burns for this subject, and if see an interview with him, I think you will agree.

    --

    -Kraft
    Live and let live
    1. Re:Kevin Warwick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      go read some of the register's articles on him..


      he's nothing more than a modern day quack..


      www.theregister.co.uk, search for his name...


      dms0


      posting anon cos i cant remeber my password

    2. Re:Kevin Warwick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look on www.theregister.co.uk, search for Kevin Warwick - a slightly different perspective on this "Captain Cyborg". Not everyone's too impressed with his stuff.....

  27. Garden variety problems by Tablizer · · Score: 0


    Mom! The Pentium ate the geraniums again!

  28. next step by matrix0040 · · Score: 1

    this is great research. this'll go a long way in peoples understanding of the human brain and the development of neural networks. i think we can look forward to more intelligent computers now.
    Now that we can see and have a bit of control over the structure, the next step to do would be to study the response of a neuron.

  29. next step by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    I hear Microsoft is already working on a version of Passport to work with these :)

  30. Dubya's a Yankee... by cirby · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...who keeps a house in Texas.


  31. Save the snails! They don't deserve this kind of animal cruelty! Everyone, protest outside of your nearest semiconductor plant to show your dislike of the abuse of these poor, innocent creatures!

    </sarcasm>

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  32. Screw the brain/computer tap... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it sad that the first thing someone thought about when they saw this story was that it brought us one step closer to a (completely unnecessary, and downright dangerous in my eyes) machine-to-brain interface.

    Hello?! Did it ever occur to such people that such a device has great possibilities for repairing or bypassing damaged nerves in, say, folks who have been paralyzed? Yeegads, people! Get a clue! If this can be made to work effectively in humans, it's just possible that the wheelchair-bound could regain their mobility!

    We've got enough info overload right now without being linked to a bunch of frelling computers. Let's think of giving someone with, say, cerebral palsy a whole new and stable degree of motor control before we start browsing the web on the insides of our retinas, hmmm?

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  33. Where I think we are headed by astafas · · Score: 1

    As single cells once worked alone, then worked together into brainless simple multi-cellular organisms, and then developed nervous structures, we are doing the same. First we all worked individually. Then as civilization came, we split up into different specialties. Today we are specialists enough that there are critical parts of society without which we cannot do as a modern society such as doctors, road repair workers, policemen, etc. This is analogous to the simple brainless multicellular animals that developed early in this planet's history. They lacked a brain. So far, we too are pretty autonomous. With the wire-nerve connection one day we are all going to one day be parts of one or more giant organisms, just like cells are. There will certainly be individuals, but they will be to the 'magalife systems' (I can't think of a better term.) what bacteria are to us today. Just like the cells of our bodies perform to instructions from the brain, so will we 'humans' do so, listening to orders from our collective brains. Just like our cells do now, we will commit suicide when ordered to do so, to prevent that day's version of cancerous growth.

    The idea of implants similar to 'the borg' is very unrefined. When the day comes, I forsee a computer many many times greater than anything today, in every one of my cells. It will be indistinguishable from biological matter as the line between bio and digital computers will blur until there is none.

    The intelligence of such hybrid humans, if that term can be applied here, could increase with moore's law, and the intelligence of the 'megalives'would be even greater.

    I can't wait. :)

  34. Re:Amazing, yet NOT scary by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    Think about it twice :

    AI to Cell : No ! Merging right now will cause a Cancer. You are Forbidden to do that.
    BUT you can use your energy to produce this nice AntiOxidant that is needed on level 4 to unclog that nasty Arteria. Now Go !!!

    What is the problem; if we understand all the consequences ?
    Could help producing solutions faster, while better controling Fats, Adrenalin, Cholesterol...

    Then I could hack into my girlfriend, pump her Oestrogen and see a Breast Increase 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  35. I love it! by Thaidog · · Score: 0

    This is great! One more step towards total ceribral freedom... did I spell ceribral right? Damn... how ironic.

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

  36. thought taxes by suzerain · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really want a brain implant, too. (Yeah, and I suppose the wheelchair-bound can walk, too -- and have brain implants at the same time!).

    But then I thought about the DMCA, and how I'll get in argument with my friends, as usual. We'll see an 80 year-old Anthony Edwards, of ER fame, on the screen and we'll try to figure out what crappy '80s movie he was in, and it'll rack our brains, and then up will pop a message from AOLTimeWarnerMicrosoftDisneySonyCBS Inc. that will say, "If you'd like to remember the movie Anthony Edwards starred in in the late '80s, we can provide the answer for 25 cents. It will automatically be deducted from your credit card."

    I'll try to remember the answer, but finally, in desperation to beat my friends to the punch, I'll grudgingly pay the 25 cents to remember the answer, but just as the credit card is authorizing, my friend will yell out, "Revenge of the Nerds!"

    But it'll be too late to cancel my thought order! And meanwhile, in my brain, I'll hear, "We have noted in our records that you couldn't recall the film 'Revenge of the Nerds', which is the intellectual property of AOLTimeWarnerMicrosoftDisneySonyCBS Inc. In the future, if you think about 'Revenge of the Nerds', be advised that you will be charged 25 cents. Thank you and have a lovely day."

    --
    gameDB
  37. Snails outevolve humans after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean eventually a snail brain will be the most intelligent thing around (besides the aliens)? I wonder if they'll feel resentful toward humans 'trampling' on them for thousands of years and demand reparations! :):):)

  38. Texas Rulez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another reason to like Texas!

  39. Please don't misrepresent my research by nesneros · · Score: 1

    I'm the guy who "linked up a couple of leach (spelled leech neurons to silicon". We do use a chip, its a custom-designed analog circuit that replicates neural function. Our interface is very different, however, so maybe this is why you thought we don't use a chip. The article you are discussing is a step up in the number of neurons being used, but not the complexity. The signals recorded through extracellular recording techniques are nowhere near what you get through intracellular (what we use with our chip). Basically all that can be determined from extracellular is "a spike happened", and I believe that this is not enough to understand the nuance that makes neural processing so powerful. Additionally, extracellular stimulation is incredibly heavy-handed, and does not even begin to approximate synaptic input to a cell. Shocking a neuron into firing is not what I would call complex.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
  40. Pain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they could transfer/share pain Wouldn't it be better to transfer/share pleasure?

    1. Re:Pain? by Kraft · · Score: 2

      I suppose 'sensations' would be a more suitable word.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
  41. I'll take it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take the Cyberjack implant, the titanium bone lacing, the synthetic muscles, the cybereyes, and those knives that come out of fake fingernails.