Slashdot Mirror


Bouncing UK Children Cause Earthquake

Xibalba writes: "This is kinda cool. One million children in the UK jumped up and down simultaneously in an attempt to see what would seismically happen." This cries out to become an annual (and international) all-ages event. Bounce! Bounce! Gain weight! Bounce! Repeat.

54 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. The same effect could be had easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just let Steve Ballmer jump around a little again.

  2. Bush Energy Plan by Dutchie · · Score: 2, Troll

    Enuf said...

    --
    • Imagination is more important than knowledge.

      • -- Albert Einstein
  3. Elementary school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    See, the children were in elementary school, which is a higher education than the journalist had.

    Early estimates suggested 75,000 tons of energy had been released during the minute of jumping.

    1. Re:Elementary school by cthugha · · Score: 2
      See, the children were in elementary school, which is a higher education than the journalist had..."Early estimates suggested 75,000 tons of energy had been released during the minute of jumping."

      Y'know, maybe those kids who thought the Earth would shatter aren't so stupid after all, if they relied on that figure. After all, they might have assumed that the idiot journo in question was talking about the mass-equivalent of the energy released, plugged it into e=mc^2, and got...well, a pretty respectable bignum.

    2. Re:Elementary school by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      Probably wouldn't destroy the Earth (though perhaps no one would be left around to care.)

      If the moon were summarily dropped on the Earth from it's current distance it would release 4.5e30 J of energy. It's commonly believed that the moon was created by a massive collision with a perhaps Mars sized body early in the solar system's existence. This would require even more energy than what would be released by bringing down the moon. Thus the Earth, as a huge chunk of rock orbiting the sun, would survive.

      Whether people, or any life, survive all depends on how it is released. For instance the energy processed by a hurricane can be in the 10s of exajoules per day. The Krakatowa volcano explosion registered about 0.2 exajoules in a matter of moments, and had a major impact on that part of the world back in the 19th century.

  4. WTF? by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    But drop that in one spot and it would have caused quite a big hole in the ground

    They aren't actually suggesting that all of Britain's children be dropped in one spot to see how big a hole they'll make, are they?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  5. Re:Consequence? by Dutchie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It will create a 3600 Richter earthquake!

    Yeah, except the Richter scale is logaritmic. So a Richter 4 is 10 times as strong as a Richter 3. So to cause a Richter 10, 10^7 * 1M people would need to be bouncing up and down.

    --
    • Imagination is more important than knowledge.

      • -- Albert Einstein
  6. Re:Consequence? by strictnein · · Score: 5, Informative

    nope, you just don't understand the richter scale

    an earthquake of 10 is not just 1 notch above an earthquake of 9. It's 10 times more powerful.

    From http://www.everything2.org/index.pl?node_id=515312 &lastnode_id=141724

    Listing is: Richter Scale # - Amount great than Richter Scale of 1 - info

    1 1 no noticeable effects...detected only by seismographs
    2 10 only slightly noticeable even if close to epicenter
    3 100
    4 1,000 slight damage near the epicenter
    5 10,000
    6 100,000 moderate destruction
    7 1,000,000 severe destruction
    8 10,000,000 one of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded

  7. Ah, they jumped voluntarily? by JCCyC · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whew, thank God. When I read "Bouncing UK children" I thought they had been thrown out of the window or something!

  8. Not really simultaneous by mmmmbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saw some of this on tv. The kids didn't actually jump simultaneously. That is, they weren't in synch as they jumped up and down. They did all start and stop at about the same time though, which is what they mean by simultaneous, I guess.

    1. Re:Not really simultaneous by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The kids didn't actually jump simultaneously.

      It wasn't simultaneously, otherwise the effects WOULD have definately been much greater.

      There is a military command (I can't remember the exact order) given in a march that instructs marching soldiers to lose cadance when crossing a bridge. Failure to do so has been known to collapse bridges as the combined force of dozens of troops marching in unison is capable of creating a powerful ressonance.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Not really simultaneous by GregWebb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While I've certainly heard of this before, its effectiveness may well be limited.

      Has anyone heard of the Millennium bridge across the Thames in London? Pedestrian suspension bridge, kept in suspension sideways IIRC so no tall pillars or overhead cables. Problem was, it wobbled. It wasn't damped enough so could sway quite noticeably from side to side and was closed. There was then a controlled re-opening for people who knew full well it would wobble. They then realised they were going to have to have squads of staff to break up those maliciously walking in step and so amplifying any forces.

      The problem, though, was that with the bridge wobbling sideways people were inevitably going to try and stabilise themselves so as not to collapse. So, as you feel a wobble sideways you brace yourself against it and so exert a sideways force on the bridge which makes it wobble in that direction... and you get the idea. Everyone quickly falls into step with each other, so amplifying the wobble...

      Spot the problem.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    3. Re:Not really simultaneous by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Route step, march!"

  9. Should have just asked Cecil.. by dohnut · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
  10. reminds me of paint the moon by unformed · · Score: 2

    (here) except that this actually worked.

    And think about it, how cool would it be to be 6 years old, and tell your parents "You can't punish me, or I'll earthquake your room."

    1. Re:reminds me of paint the moon by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      OK, first you say the light will be incredibly scattered, weakening and dispersing the light so much that it's worthless. Then you say that it's nearly impossible to hit the moon from such a distance.

      Now, the question I pose is that if the light is so dispersed by the time it reaches the moon, couldn't you just point it in the general direction of the moon and have some miniscule fraction of the light reach it? Then with so many people contributing their tiny fraction, the net result might just be a noticeable effect.

      However, depending how much the light is dispersed (presumably quite a bit) and how much light is absorbed by the time it reaches the moon (practically all of it), you'd probably need more than you and a couple of your buddies doing it.

  11. Re:They actually succeeded... by dragons_flight · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd like to think you're joking, but since I'm not sure I'm going to reply anyway.

    They were expecting the jumping to be equivalent to about a magnitude 3 earthquake on the Richter scale which is a common seismic event that shows up on seismographs but which people can't even detect. A significant quake will be more like a 5 or higher on the Richter scale. This scale is logarithmic so a 4 is actually 10 times more powerful than a 3, and a 5 is 10 times a 4.

    Thus the scientists would have to have been mistaken about the impact of all that jumping by a factor of 100 to actually rattle people. Any scientist worth his salt ought to be able to estimate the effect of what he's doing more precisely than 2 orders of magnitude, especially if it might be dangerous for him to be wrong.

    Note: The 10 times factor applies to wave amplitude, energy content scales by about 10*Sqrt(10) or 31 times from one level to the next.

  12. No by unformed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're British scientists. We don't need reasons to do things, just cool things to do.

    -
    The Lameness filter can filter this.

  13. Re:Consequence? by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

    While, everyone has already pointed out that the scale doesn't work that way, I want to add something. Would you really want to use this as a weapon (even if you could)? After all the jumpers and their country would be right at the epicenter of the thing.

    Okay everyone, let's destroy our homeland in order to break some windows belonging to those no good foreign devils.

  14. To no use by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to the BBC the result was... not much.

    For those /.'ers who sneer at reading linked articles the kids just went out and jumped about for a minute. No attempt at synchronization beyond a wall clock and some teacher calling out "OK Luvvies - jump about now!" There wasn't even an attempt to get the kids on a beat (apparently BBC1 couldn't be persuaded to play Queen's "We Will Rock You" at the right time ;-)

    However as directly useless as this may be to science it's doubtless opened the eye's of Britians youth to what promises to be only the first of the many pointless exercises they will be required to go through in their lives, always a lesson worth learning.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:To no use by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However as directly useless as this may be to science it's doubtless opened the eye's of Britians youth to what promises to be only the first of the many pointless exercises they will be required to go through in their lives, always a lesson worth learning.

      It also could have interested a few children in seismology, or science in general, and some of those children may grow up to become a world-reknowned scientist who discovers a way to accurately predict earthquakes, saving innumerable lives.

      But it's much more fun to be jaded, isn't it?

      --

      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:To no use by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      However as directly useless as this may be to science

      Well, the article in the "story" said that some people are going to be using the data to study how long vibrations move around in the crust of the earth, which I guess could provide some usefull data.

  15. Little kids could have thought of this! by kidblast · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was a child, I often thought of what would occur if a huge number of people jumped simultaneously, but I never really thought it would happen. Apparently, though, if you have a PhD in Physics and a little notebook of all your kiddy schemes, then you can have them carried out as "research". Can't wait to see what will be in the news next. Im guessing something where we see what will happen if everyone in the world flushes their toilets simultaneously. Will this cause the polar caps melt, or the oceans to drain? Find out on yahoo! (or slashdot)

    1. Re:Little kids could have thought of this! by loraksus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was in a dorm a few years back and the occupants did almost the same thing. All of us flushed our toilets (approx 400 toilets) simultaniously (timed to when the local news started). Dunno what the hell happened, but we flooded the basement somehow. (5 floors, we had a math guru time the floors, sort of a time on target thing, and the first floor flushed 4 seconds after the music started, 2nd 3 sec, 3rd 2 sec, 4th 1 sec, 5th as they heard it)
      It was a while back...

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  16. China's Doomdsay Weapon by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone now, ready, set, go!

  17. See also... by Cerberus9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of:

    1) the effect when thousands of soldiers crossing a bridge intentionally fall out of step to avoid setting up sympathetic vibrations in the bridge, thus collapsing it (which used to be a real problem before they figured out the cause!)

    2) for the Chinese scanario: instead of having them all jump off a chair in their homes, line them up on the shoreline and have them dive in to the surf simultaneously - possibly setting up a tseunami heading eastward.

    1. Re:See also... by Detritus · · Score: 2

      It's standard procedure in the U.S. Army to order "route step" (unsynchronized marching) while crossing a bridge. I suspect the bit about sympathetic vibrations causing a bridge to collapse is mostly an urban legend, at least for modern bridges. This page describes a structural failure of a hotel walkway during a dance. From what I remember, the cause was found to be inadequate design and construction of the walkway.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:See also... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      I suspect the bit about sympathetic vibrations causing a bridge to collapse is mostly an urban legend

      ROUTE STEP! That's it! I had forgotten!

      No, it's not an urban legend. I remember seeing a Black and White video clip that was inserted into an instructional video where a bridge began bouncing to the point that soliders were falling down over themselves. Apparently, some weaker bridges HAVE collapsed or sustained damage, and thus ROUTE STEP was created out of necessity. I remember specifically the video said that while some well constructed modern bridges probably would not collapse, the order is to be given regardless as a matter of standard practice to prevent possible "bad judgement calls".

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:See also... by bazoungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suspect the bit about sympathetic vibrations causing a bridge to collapse is mostly an urban legend, at least for modern bridges

      It did happen on April the 16th 1850 in France, when a troop crossed a suspension bridge durong a storm near Angers (the Basse-Chaine bridge, over the river Maine) causing 220 soldiers to drown.

      There's a good sum up of the event here (in English)

      The cause is supposed to be the addition of gusts of wind causing the bridge to sway, and the troop marching steps, all giving a phenomenon of resonance.

      and it even was reported in the New york Herald at the time :

      http://www.goodbyemag.com/may00/herald-deaths.html (in English)

      however, the causes are very similar to what happened to the Tacoma Narrows bridge, on nov 07 th 1940, catastrophic wind swaying.

      I'm happy to share this part of my history,

      Baz.

    4. Re:See also... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      There was a show on TLC/Discovery/The History Channel (damned if I can tell tem apart anymore) the other day that mentioned that when the Brooklyn Bridge was complete, the Army marched a brigade over it in step, as a deliberate statement of faith in the massive design.

      I remember the KC collapse, although swaying to the music was news to me. IIRC, the design was fine, but the plans had been modified during construction, replacing one big continuous rod with two smaller rods in series. I particularly recall a friend of mine, then an engineering student close to graduation, proudly noting that the decision had apparently been made by a junior engineer, "just like me!" :)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    5. Re:See also... by Karmageddon · · Score: 2
      Apparently, some weaker bridges HAVE collapsed or sustained damage

      you've written several confused posts now: you're on the right track but you've got the different concepts all muddled. it is not the strength of the bridge, nor is it the combined energy of the marchers, though those things do play a role.

      What is important to the collapse is the undamped resonance of the bridge which stores the energy as it is added to the system.

  18. Re:Consequence? by Pope · · Score: 2
    Chilli had a 9.5, i think that is the biggest

    Wow, those are some powerful Jalepenos!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  19. Infamous earthquake game at Death Valley by ScottBob · · Score: 3, Funny
    In 1988, football fans literally caused an earthquake when Louisiana State University's quarterback threw a touchdown pass on a fourth-and-nine with 1 minute, 41 seconds remaining in the game, to beat Auburn 7-6. 79,431 cheering fans inside Tiger Stadium ("Death Valley") jumping to their feet all at once caused an earthquake that registered around 3 or so on the seismograph inside the nearby geological sciences building.


    But in the years since, the seismograph has fallen to the budget axe, and Tiger Stadium has been expanded to hold over 90,000. So if a "squeaker" of a game like that ever was to happen again, the resulting earthquake may topple the Louisiana state capitol building and ring bells in Alabama, but no one on campus will know how strong it was...

  20. Responsibility? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Fear is for lesser scientists. Next week we're bussing the kids to a local bridge and having them jump in synch.

  21. Destroy the jumpers in the process by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    How long could a jump earthquake last? Once it go really going it would be centered on the jumpers themselves.

    Careful what you wish for pudgy english children.

  22. Some other fun synchronous experiments... by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    For our next big event, on signal, lets all simultaneously:

    1) flush toilets
    2) pick up a telephone handset
    3) switch on a large electrical appliance
    4) call for Chinese take out delivery
    5) withdraw funds from the bank
    6) visit the same web site

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Some other fun synchronous experiments... by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was the experiment that was done in the early days of cellular telephony here in the US. A guy filled a football stadium-sized parking lot with people, loaned them all cell phones, had them dial, and then everybody pressed SEND at the same time. The point he was making was that the cellular system wouldn't handle such an event gracefully.

      It didn't. It crashed not only the local cell site, but several others as well.

      Of course, this is in a microcosmn what happens when there is a big "event" such as an earthquake or bombing - everybody tries to call Aunt Phillis and the cell network goes down. That's when we hams get busy....

    2. Re:Some other fun synchronous experiments... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

      Likely some of those were nearby cells which some phones got handed off to in order to deal with the load.

      A given location can access more than one given cell site, where I live, I've seen my phone connecting to 4 different ones, right in the same place (debug mode on the phone is cool ;)).

      So you can't say strictly that any site is part of one and only one cell. A failed site, a bush, etc can cause the loss or degradation of a signal which will cause the phone to look elsewhere.

      Often the phone can and does, then work off another site.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    3. Re:Some other fun synchronous experiments... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Actually, it wasn't the handoffs that killed the system. When the first site failed, it killed all of the sites that were part of that network via the trunk lines connecting the sites. The trunk lines are how the sites communicate hand-off messages, look up subscriber data, etc.

      There was a bug in the site firmware, and so when it overloaded, it started sending garbage over the trunks.

  23. I remember one time when. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some of the kids in my old highschool organized the following:

    All toilets were flushed on the final note of the national anthum.

    Didn't actually make anything explode as hoped, but it did back up the plumbing for about half a day.

    -Fantastic Lad

  24. Re:That's just a million... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
    #include <IAAP.h>

    Well, I haven't checked the calculations, but even if this de-orbits Earth, it will return to its orbit when the people come down again. There's something called conservation of momentum to ensure this.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  25. Re:They actually succeeded... by RedBear · · Score: 4, Redundant
    What if they have made a real big earthquake with damage and such?

    Lord Richter: "Do not be so proud of these children you've instructed; the power of one million bouncing children is insignificant next to the power of the Force..."

    Commander of Child-Powered Earthquake Machine: "You don't frighten us with your scientist's ways, Lord Richter. Your sad devotion to that ancient profession has not helped you conjure up new fault lines, or given you clairvoyance enough to--urk! Ack! Ick! Urg!"

    Prime Minister Tarkin: "Enough of this! Richter, stop jumping up and down on him!"

    Lord Richter: "As you wish..."

  26. Now if they could just find the right resonant... by HardFocus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This story reminded me of Tesla's Earthquake machine which, if you believe the stories, demonstrates just how much damage you can inflict when you hit the resonant frequency with a modest amount of power.

  27. Re:They actually succeeded... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2

    Damn, why do I never have modpoints when I REALLY want em? This is funny...

  28. Re:"Leap of Faith" by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    You know, I try to follow what I call the "Ummm Rule". It's based on the idea that if my explanation for a hypothetical accident begins with "Ummm...see, it was like this...", than maybe I need to reconsider my plans.

    ("You left the keys in the car?"

    ("Ummm, yeah, see, 'cause I was only going in for a minute...")

    As improbable as it seems, this would seem to me to be a classic Ummm situation:

    "You destroyed half of San Francisco for a laugh!?"

    "Ummm, well, yeah, but we didn't think it would ever really work...!"

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  29. Re: 75,000 tons of energy ??? by cruelworld · · Score: 2

    They can only mean 75,000 tonnes of pure energy. You know, the star trek kind.

  30. Re:That's just a million... by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2

    I think nuclear bombs are more powerful than all the world's people jumping. And a meteor is far more powerful than that.

    Also, the world would have to move tens of billions of miles for appreciable climate change. The earth already moves over a billion towards and away from the sun in its yearly irregular orbit. In fact, the northern hemisphere's winter takes place when the earth is one billion miles closer.

  31. In related news... by pridkett · · Score: 2

    Elsewhere around the world, the Weekly World News is still reporting that the chineese are going to drive their cars all in the same direction at the same time in order to change the rotation of the earth. Apparently the Russians are planning on flushing their toilets all at the same time in hopes that the rotation of the water in the toilets will send the earth plumetting into the cosmos.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
  32. Re:Scales... by isorox · · Score: 2

    bingo, been over year sinec I did geology a-level

    "tall girls can flirt and other queer things can do"

    bit like "cockney old sod did contract penis tumors juggling cold testicles quickly"
    (cambrian, ordovician, sillurian, devonian, carbiniferous, p-something, tirassic, jurrasic, creatceous, tertiary, quaternary)

  33. not new - done before by mrv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the late 1980s/early 1990s, there was a "prediction" that there would be a great earthquake to hit the Mississippi River valley. (I think it was predicted for an intercontinental plate line running near St. Louis.)

    Anyhow, during the week or so of hyped-up media coverage (slow news week?), there were several "Fat is Beautiful"-type groups (and maybe a few weight-loss groups, too, I don't remember) that all decided to stand on the fault line and jump in unison, to get the big earthquake started. The earthquake never happened, but...

    --
    -mrv
  34. Re: 75,000 tons of energy ??? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or for the pendantic...
    What would that be? The people who dangle?
    &lt/pedantic&gt

  35. Re:Consequence? by plastik55 · · Score: 2
    Remember a seismic wave travels at a finite velocity, and waves can be made to constructively interfere.


    If you timed everyone's jump well enough you could make it so that the small vibrations from each individual jump would propagate out of China and all arrive at an outside target at the same time, without any destructive effect inside China.


    Think of it this way: if you had 1000 people drop drops of water into a swimming pool at the same time, and all the drops were on the edge of a circle, you could create a large disturbance in the center of the circle that would be bigger than the disturbance at the drops themselves.


    Now pulling this off would require a fairly advanced model of wave propagation through the earth, as the wave velocity varies through different layers of the crust. You'd probably only be able to concentrate a fraction of the available energy that way. Actually you're guaranteed low efficiency by the laws of thermodynamics. But in principle, concentrating seismic waves is certainly doable. in fact I'm sure there has been some military research into concentrating the seismic waves from precisely timed explosions.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  36. Re:That's just a million... by plastik55 · · Score: 2
    Also, the world would have to move tens of billions of miles for appreciable climate change. The earth already moves over a billion towards and away from the sun in its yearly irregular orbit. In fact, the northern hemisphere's winter takes place when the earth is one billion miles closer.

    That's impressive considering the average radius of Earch's orbit is 96 MILLion miles.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  37. A modest proposal by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    They aren't actually suggesting that all of Britain's children be dropped in one spot to see how big a hole they'll make, are they?

    Of course not, but some Mr. Swift has a plan for Irish children...

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu