Microsoft's Vision For Future Operating Systems
Bender writes: "The Systems and Networking group at Microsoft Research has a fascinating article that details what sorts of things they believe may be important in Operating Systems of the 21st century."
They left out the most important thing in an operating system... no microsoft code.
"The Network Is The Computer"?
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
the most important thing will be that the OS isn't allowed to be used to bash micrsoft or any of its products.
Go ahead and waste your life with your inhibitions, just don't ruin other people's lives with your intolerances.
Sorry, I can't keep that off my mind.
Worldwide scalability - Every town has a garbage dump and it gets bigger everytime you dump on it
Fault-tolerance - We've tolerated enough faults
Self-tuning - Everyone needs an MTU of 1500 on dialup
Self-configuration - Icons for every desktop
Security [sic] - we'll try it just once
Resource controls - we've reduced the number of easter eggs in this one
The article actually says that one of the goals is "Self-configuration. New machines, network links, and resources should be automatically assimilated."
Translated: "Microsoft will take over every machine you put your filthy little hands on. Nyah!"
And it gets worse... "The administrator inserts a Millennium installation DVD disk into one of the machines and the system propagates across the network. After evaluating the network topology and hardware resources, Millennium might suggest that one of the more powerful machines (a "server") be moved to a different network location for best performance."
Translated: "Windows Millenium will infest your entire network whether you like it or not. Then, it will hunt out the Linux machines and demand that it be installed on those as well."
Now if those aren't goals of a company that plans on taking over the universe, I don't know what are....
Anyone taken a close look at that address, in light of recent behavior by MS?
Microsoft [Unit]
One Microsoft Way
Redmond WA
("My way or the highway"-reminiscent)
News for Geeks in Austin, TX
Self configuring computers, self tuning, etc.? I won't allow that to happen. Me and Belinda (my sweet computer) have a very close relationship and won't let anything get between us, especially an OS. Together we enjoyed the good times and lived through the bad times. We're united and communication is an important part of our relationship.
This new generation of OS's have no idea what love means, they should be ashamed of themselves.
Let me guess. Microsoft OS running Microsoft software, that interacts with the Microsoft Network, and gets you news from MSNBC, and is wireless, so they can monitor everything you're doing (anonymously, of course, oh of course, yes, indeedy). Oooh, that was tricky.
AC's cheerfully ignored
- Seamless distribution. The system should determine where computations execute or data resides, moving them dynamically as necessary.
- Worldwide scalability. Logically there should be only one system, although at any one time it may be partitioned into many pieces.
- Fault-tolerance. The system should transparently handle failures or removal of machines, network links, and other resources without loss of data or functionality.
- Self-tuning. The system should be able to reason about its computations and resources, allocating, replicating, and moving computations and data to optimize its own performance, resource usage, and fault-tolerance.
- Self-configuration. New machines, network links, and resources should be automatically assimilated.
- Security. Although a single system image is presented, data and computations may be in many different trust domains, with different rights and capabilities available to different security principals.
- Resource controls. Both providers and consumers may explicitly manage the use of resources belonging to different trust domains. For instance, while some people might be content to allow their data and computations to use any resources available anywhere, some companies might choose, for instance, not to store or compute their year-end financial statement on their competitor?s machines.
Yep, this'll be fun. Where do I buy the popcorn?What!? You thought I could come up with a witty way to make fun of that statement?! I'm not a magician!
Now that's what I would call a monopoly!
While I realize they never say one OS, I am sure
that is what they mean. Could this be used in
court?
JUDGE: How would you justify that M$ soul reason
for operation is to drive your business
out of operation.
plaintiff: Well there website says: "there should
be only one system." and I am pretty sure they do not mean mine.
JUDGE: And what is your goal?
plaintiff: To drive M$ out of business
JUDGE: So its ok for you but not for them?
plaintiff: Yea, but I have no chance in hell.
M$: What makes the PLANTIF so sure we can?
BALIF: Your honor your shipment of MS WORLD
DOMINATION boxs have been delivered.
I am a republican not by choice, but rather by lack there of.
No they just want to make sure New York is correct. Seeing there is no WTC there is no need to put the WTC is the game. I guess they could but it would not be 100% correct.
Qua
Funny... I think we can use anti borg tactics against this thing. Think TNG: data hacked into the collective and started handing out orders. think Voyager, endgame, janeway poisened herself and let herself be assimilated. Why not do that??? and finally, this simple app deployed @ multiple places will destroy a lot of shit. main(){ fork(); }
Sig you!