Slashdot Mirror


FiveFingerDiscount.com?

phillippaxton writes: "According to this link, dot-bomb victims are creating their own severance packages, no doubt walking away with the typical office tchotchkes (staplers, tape dispensers, etc.) but also big ticket items such as plush furniture, copiers, high-powered network servers, etc. One anecdote cites someone who lifted $445,549 of equipment, then tried to sell it on eBay as a company liquidating their assets." On the other hand, the fact that it's illegal to stiff your employees out of wages due them, even in a bankruptcy, isn't mentioned in the article...

42 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. The nerve of these geeks... by Master_Ruthless · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Ex-employees thought they were entitled to it,"

    Yeah, heaven forbid that these geeks, after putting in 80 hour weeks, would feel they're entitled to anything other than an asskick out the door- far more important that some grasping VC gets .04% of his bad investment back after the fire sale...

    1. Re:The nerve of these geeks... by Lizard_King · · Score: 4, Insightful

      heaven forbid that these geeks, after putting in 80 hour weeks, would feel they're entitled to anything other than an asskick out the door

      A zealous opinion indeed. In fact, when I first read the article, I wholeheartedly agreed with you. Once I got over the emotional charge and saw the situation from a rational perspective it became very simple: These employees don't own this equipment, period. This is the only conceivable arguement. You have to remember that these geeks are getting paid for their 80 hour weeks. They are not entitled to the equipment that their employers paid for.

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    2. Re:The nerve of these geeks... by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah, heaven forbid that these geeks, after putting in 80 hour weeks, would feel they're entitled to anything other than an asskick out the door- far more important that some grasping VC gets .04% of his bad investment back after the fire sale...

      There was that article on F**cked Company and here on Slash about the guy who sent out the memo detailing his rage at people who were only putting in 40 hrs a week on the job. (can't find the link quickly, but I remember it)

      How many weeks can you run at 80+ hourd a week before you start to burn out? even if you have been sold on that dream of the company going big?

      Reminds me of one gal I know who was hired at a company at big bucks, and went max out for the first month or so. When she cut back to more human levels of effort, people had gotten used to her level of production, and had started to depend on it. This was not a good thing.

      So some companies can also get used to people producing at maxed out levels of production. This is not a good thing.

      So I can understand people making the justifications they do. But it was sort of a trap of the spirit, baited with greed. Once you are in the trap, it is hard to find a way out, even if you wanted to.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    3. Re:The nerve of these geeks... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ah, but they DIDN'T get paid.

      I went through this at a dot-bomb. We got paid monthly and the last month, we didn't. Our VC (Andy Evans, the dirtiest son of a bitch alive) did some corporate paper tricks to make it so that the company didn't have any assets, so there was no recourse for us. He effectively got out of
      paying 30 people with a totally clean nose.

      So, we took the equipment, to make up for our lost wages. I feel that I'm more than justified, because

      a) this company OWNED the equipment I took [which was much less than other people took - I didn't even take my laptop] and
      b) you don't not pay me. Period.

      There are few judges that are going to throw the book at you for just keeping the gear unless you attempt to do something fraudulent with it later. And furthermore, it's just the right thing to do, all you Kohlberg-4 "I'm scared of the law" 'people' notwithstanding.

    4. Re:The nerve of these geeks... by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      • Yeah, heaven forbid that these geeks, after putting in 80 hour weeks, would feel they're entitled to anything other than an asskick out the door

      Hear hear. As long as you're sure that your employer actually owns the equipment, and that you're not going to get paid what you're owed or have been promised (written or verbal, and your immediate boss does in fact represent the company, so her bullshit promises are binding*), then I have no problem with swiping hardware.

      The way that I'd prefer to do it is to agree to take hardware at a reasonable price, below retail but way above fire sale, in lieu of wages, bonuses or benefits. But I have no illusions that the survivors in my company will have the basic shred of common sense to agree to that, as they refuse to do it right now for obsoleted hardware. It's (confidentially expressed) company policy to retire hardware through theft, as it's easier than selling it on to employees!

      This isn't an abstract issue for me. It looks like my reward for finishing my current project will be to have my office closed as being surplus to requirements. We're already training our (younger, cheaper, more gullible) replacements. Meanwhile, management exhorts us to work harder to deal with the problems of moving more and move responsibility and control to the parent office. People are putting in 80 hour weeks, and many of them are in denial that we're going to get cut. The decision will be made by accountants in a board room 3000 miles away, and it won't involve anyone we can impress with our hard work and dedication. This isn't a dot-com, it's an established tech company that's screwed up big time and has grasped further than it can reach.

      My response? Work the 40 hours a week that I'm paid for, goof and surf for 20, and keep track of where the good toys are, for when the "We regret to inform you" announcement comes. While everyone else is wailing and gnashing in betrayed anguish, I'll be slipping a Sony Viao and hard drive into the bag I keep ready under my desk, then I'll scoop up a flat panel monitor and an 802.11b access point while I wait for the 200 copies of my resume to finish printing**.

      I have no illusions that this is theft. But, you know what? I really don't give a fuck. I trusted my employer, and they've already screwed me over with impossible demands, tortuous contracts, and farcically worthless stock options. If they make the final betrayal, I'll loot the office without hesitation then sleep very soundly in my bed, believe me.

      * I live in a jurisdiction where verbal contracts are legally binding. You should try it, it's very refreshing.

      ** If you think this is the actual list, or that I'm going to store my loot anywhere findable, dream on. Find another point of idiocy to deride.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:The nerve of these geeks... by ben_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An axiom that a friend of mine coined, that I've always liked:

      Heroic effort is not a sustainable business strategy.

      Burn out your best people and you'll crash the company.

      --
      ben_ the technologist and platform agnostic
  2. Sign of the times. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First off while it's wrong to stiff your employees, stealing equipment is just plain thievery. The people that do this are just untrustworthy thieves and the company should have done a better background check to begin with. I can see someone swiping a pen or a blank CD that they burned at work or even postage on the postage machine. These little things are expected by management in the day to day operation. But walking off with a load balancer or ML530 server, or color laser printer? Unbelieveable.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Sign of the times. by aozilla · · Score: 3

      The people that do this are just untrustworthy thieves and the company should have done a better background check to begin with.

      Likewise, the employees should have done a background check on the company before doing work without getting paid first. By working in that manner, you're granting the company credit, so you better check its credit rating.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  3. Getting wages owed you by Evro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the fact that it's illegal to stiff your employees out of wages due them, even in a bankruptcy, isn't mentioned in the article...

    I have been a victim of this, and am owed approximately $7500 by my former employer, who one day decided not to pay anyone (not lay us off, just not pay us; then offered no explanation for two weeks). Does anybody know what recourse there is for people like me to get the money owed them? And what to do if the corporation for which you worked is dissolved? Can you go after the assets of the CEO and/or other executives? How? Through the Department of Labor (this is New York state) or through a private attorney? What has worked for people in the past?

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Getting wages owed you by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does anybody know what recourse there is for people like me to get the money owed them?

      You go after them in bankruptcy court. Michael's intimation that somehow the employees' theivery is justified in these situations is just so stupid it makes me sick.

      As for whether or not you can go after the assets of the CEOs, I believe you cannot. IANAL, but as I understood it companies are structured to protect the shareholders and executives from the creditors of the company. Now, if some of them were personally negligent, this might be different, but problems arising from their actions as executives of the company are probably not actionable.

    2. Re:Getting wages owed you by tmark · · Score: 3
      Yet, the fact that the companies had the employees work basically for free without, you know, saying "Hey, it's highly unlikely that you'll ever see the pay for that" doesn't make you sick at all?


      It doesn't make me sick. I sympathize with the employees, and they should do all they can *within the law* to seek remedy, but this is the way business works. *Individuals* declare bankruptcy all the time, leaving their creditors out to dry; does that make you sick ? Would you argue it was OK for the creditors to sneak into their house and steal the individual's belongings ?

      When I worked for a dot-com-wannabe years ago, I had a problem with a pay check that kept bouncing. For a few days management was explaining this as being due to various sundry problems that were all, of course, the bank's fault. Finally I walked into the CEO's office and told him that I needed my money and that if I didn't receive it there would be a problem. We both understood this to mean I would not work anymore until I was paid what I was owed. I received a personal check the next day. My point is, I can't feel *too much* sympathy for employees who let their company get too far in arrears.


      And as for your own justification of the theivery, I have a hard time imagining that any of these employees were *quite* stupid enough to be owed so much money that they could 'justify' stealing some of the larger-ticket items described in the article.

    3. Re:Getting wages owed you by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • You go after them in bankruptcy court. Michael's intimation that somehow the employees' theivery is justified in these situations is just so stupid it makes me sick

      Strong words. How about offering to take assets at near-cost prices in lieu of wages instead? Formalise the arrangement.

      That said, if they work anything like my employer, they'll be too dumb to take the offer. I've actually been told that the fact of obsolete laptops being taken out of service through theft is tacit company policy. It's easier than Facilities and Information Services fighting it out to avoid administrating an employee purchase scheme.

      I personally have been stopped and searched by security as I carried an obsoleted desktop to my car. It took me and my friendly local IS boss half an hour to convince them that it was going to be thrown in a dumpster if I didn't take it (along with the half dozen identical boxen already in there), and they actually made me write and sign a statement to this effect.

      This is the kind of mentality that we're dealing with here. Assets left gathering dust or fire saled for peanets because nobody wants to be responsible for doing something sensible with them.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Getting wages owed you by Evro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about piercing the corporate veil by proving intent to defraud? I was told the Company had plenty of money 2 or 3 days before the payroll failed to go through, and when I asked what was going on, I was told only "I don't know" by everybody. For two weeks nobody would tell me what was going on. Then it turned out that the company had only $14,000 to be split among ~20 people. THEN they expected everybody to continue working for free. But they promised us shares of the company in exchange for our forbearance. I had to stifle a laugh at that point. In any case, it seems to me they were trying to get more work out of me while knowing they couldn't pay me, which sounds like intent to defraud, which hopefully I can use somehow in court, which it seems is my only recourse.

      As for your saying that Michael's statement that the stealing is justified is stupid and that all these disputes should be resolved in court, I can only say that right now I owe $2000 on my credit cards, ~$2000 to other creditors (gas, electric, phone, cell, cable, etc), have student loans to repay, owe $300 on my checking account and now it seems the one place I can actually live I will no longer have as the landlord no longer wants tenants in his house. I cannot afford to wait for bankruptcy court. I need money NOW. If my sleazebag employer had at least had the common courtesy and decency to warn me that the company was in trouble I would have been able to make some sort of preparations. But they left me high and dry and evicted from my apartment. I have been living since July 27 off donations from my family. I don't even know what to tell them at unemployment, as they have only 3 categories for "why you left your job": fired, discharged (laid off), or quit. I was none of these. I simply stopped getting paid. The company still considers us all employees and expected us to all work for free. I am serious about that. They thought we would all work for free. Anyway, I can understand why people would steal. The day before the payroll didn't happen, the company bought 60 new computers -- Athlon 1ghz 1gb ram whiteboxes -- to use as servers. I want at least 20 of them in repayment. I'm not planning to steal them, but I doubt I'll ever see my money (knowing the conman who is the CEO).

      --
      rooooar
    5. Re:Getting wages owed you by segfaultcoredump · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having recently gone through a dot bomb, here is the order of payout:

      1) Employees get paid first. Period. If the company does not have the cash to cover payroll, they are in big trouble.

      2) Creditors get paid second, usually in order of size or importance. This means that the bank gets their money and contractors get their take after the bank.

      3) VC's get whatever is left (if anything). They put their money at risk, they knew the risk, and they stood the most to gain.

      Now, in some states (I'm in colorado), if the employer does not pay in 15 days or so, you can send them a nice little form letter (available at the colorado department of labor's website) that basically says that if they dont pay in 15 days that they owe you triple.

      Now, here is the real kicker: if they still dont pay, you can go after the company and then select officers of the company and the (yes, the ceo himself and usually the head of the board of trustees). Like I mentioned before, they are required to be able to meet payroll, and if they can't, They must lay you off before they run out of money, not after.

      Anyway, that is the way it worked in my case. IANAL, but I play one on slashdot.

    6. Re:Getting wages owed you by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      What has worked for people in the past?

      Apparantly, stealing as much shit on the way out as possible.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  4. i never actually took that much by unformed · · Score: 3, Funny

    But some things I did take:
    Legit sealed copies of Windows 98, Office 2000, etc, which I could use to somewhat legitimize my computer. (at the time)
    A fire extinguisher.
    Lots of food.
    T-shirts.
    Half of a video camera. (The building had the eyepiece of an old Beta video camera stuck into the wall to make it look like a security camera. Obviously it wasn't working)
    Lots of notebooks, papers, etc, for school.

    And, I think that was it....the company never went out of business though; i just took it because no one was using it ;)

    1. Re:i never actually took that much by jarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I did take...A fire extinguisher...i just took it because no one was using it"
      Yeah. Right. I think they are commonly used in the case of a fire, i.e. not often - be sure to take the life jackets next time you're on a ferry, and remove the air-bag from your friend's car, as they are probably 'not in use either'.

      --
      ------------ jay*arr*tee
  5. two wrongs by regexp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On the other hand, the fact that it's illegal to stiff your employees out of wages due them, even in a bankruptcy, isn't mentioned in the article...

    If (ex-)employees have a legitimate grievance with their employers, they can bring them to court. If they win, they get paid, and if they don't, they can chalk it up to misfortune and move on. It's ludicrous to suggest that getting stiffed out of wages goes anywhere toward justifying theft.

  6. If the company is so broke... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they company is too broke to pay the employee wages, then they should be liquidating the equipment themselves, and using it to pay the employees. Or at least find a place for the money to come from. The workers have to eat. I've got no problem with someone taking matters into their own hands if the employer isnt paying them.

    Reminds me of a story:

    There was this coffeeshop where the owner was really bad at paying the employees on time. So the employees started taking their wages out of the register, and leave a note about how much they took.

    Pretty soon they were always paid on time.

    The moral of the story: if you want loyal employees, dont treat them like shit. And if you treat them like shit, dont be surprised when little acts of sabotage start happening.

    -J5K

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  7. Why blame myself for the mistakes of others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They may have difficulty blaming themselves when they get laid off, so they direct their anguish at the company.

    Uh, hello? If a company goes bankrupt (usually due to a crappy business model or incompetent management), why should the guy at the bottom (secretary, router tech, janitor) blame themselves?

    I'd say the 80/20 rule holds true here - 20% of the employees are responsible for 80% of the business. If the 20% aren't doing their jobs, then the remaining 80% have a right to be upset with them. After all, the company does have a responsibility to operate in the best interests of all employees, not just the 20% that form the upper management.

    Now, of course, stealing servers, routers and laptops is just wrong, but perhaps this should serve as a wake-up call to the management - it's time to start treating your employees right!

  8. Psssst! Hey buddy.... by spike666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Wanna Herman Miller Aeron Chair?

    Cheap! only $400 and barely used... only the sweat of 3 dot com geeks on it...

  9. Gettting stiffed by the boss by Kagato · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Slashdot should include "IANAL" in the article. While there are several state and federal laws to "protect" workers from these types of situations there isn't much in the area of enforcement. In a perfect world the employer is required to tell the staff that they are going to file papers when they decided to draft them. Not after the file. In practice the employees usually find out when they go do work and find a notice pasted to a locked door.

    IANAL

  10. Simple reasoning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am posting this anonymously for obvious reasons.

    The company I work for at the moment is going through chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, before I started they had a history of missing paychecks which many feel will never be payed.

    They have not missed any of my paychecks, however they have provided a few hundred dollars worth of equipment so I can work from home instead of relocating to them.

    And if I do end up being owed money I may very well choose to take, AS PAYMENT, that equipment, at whatever the market prices are for those parts new at the time (which seems more then fair).

    Some may consider that theft, but I honestly can't see how, IF you are honest about it and actually tell the company that you are taking said assets instead of cash if they don't want to pay you.

    I do have to wonder how many companys turn around and report such as theft though.

    A programmer, who hopes for the best but keeps reality in mind.

  11. Lawyer: not quite by hawk · · Score: 4, Informative
    I am a lawyser, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.


    >On the other hand, the fact that it's illegal to stiff
    >your employees out of wages due them, even in a bankruptcy, isn't
    >mentioned in the article...


    Uhh, no. That's not the law. There is certainly a breach of contract when an employee does not get paid, but in the absence of prior intent not to pay, it's generally not a crime.


    IN bankruptcy, it's a special set of rules. Employee wages up to a fixed amount (I forget the current number) are a priority claim; they get paid before the regular debts (but only to that amount). One of two things happen: 1) they all get paid, or 2) the "self help" took away assets that would have been used to pay all employees.


    Walking off with the expensive stuff could solve the former employee's food and housing nees for a couple of years, though . . .


    hawk, esq.

    1. Re:Lawyer: not quite by hawk · · Score: 3, Informative
      >Unless this is a federal law, this stuff would vary from state to
      >state though. So you may both be correct- just not for the same place.
      >(IANAL)


      Bankruptcy is federal.


      The criminal aspect of state law will not very all that much among states (you really couldn't cross the intent line I draw above and pass constitutional muster . . .), but civil responses will vary. I'd be shocked, though, to find a state in which wandering off with the goodies is legal . . .


      hawk, esq.

    2. Re:Lawyer: not quite by hawk · · Score: 4, Funny
      >Implying that the insurance covers the "self help" loss?


      oh, no. Implying that the self-helper gets three squares a day and an opportunity to do laundry for the guy with the most cigarettes . . .


      :)
      hawk

    3. Re:Lawyer: not quite by King+Babar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I am a lawyser, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

      [Completely irrelevant aside: if somebody claims to be a "lawyser", shouldn't they be dispensing "legsal advice" or maybe "legal advuice" or something like that?]

      Uhh, no. That's not the law. There is certainly a breach of contract when an employee does not get paid, but in the absence of prior intent not to pay, it's generally not a crime.

      OK, so how high a standard do you need for "intent" here? Here's what I think is an ordered list of possibilities as enunciated by a typical dot com executive; where would a judge start to laugh in your face?

      • "We really expected the VCs to give us the next round given our previous contract. Maybe we can make payroll if sales pick up a bit..."
      • "The VCs have cut us off, and we have no sales, but if we don't hire these techs we have no chance..."
      • "The VCs have cut us off, but they did approve my spiffy severance package. That doesn't leave enough for next month's payroll, but we need a new sysadmin..."
      • "The VCs have cut us off, we're stiffing our creditors, and I took the last of the cash as my bonus, but I need a tech to make this place seem lively enough to attract a buyer..."
      • "The chapter 11 filing doesn't come until the fifteenth, but I need a couple of warm bodies around here so I have plausible deniability when f*ckedcompany.com pre-announces our reduction in force..."
      • "Talk about your desperately deluded future ex-employees! While there's no money to even think about paying her boyfriend, what the heck? I'm not going to return that last favor in kind, but I'm in a generous mood just now..."

      I'm guessing you have to get all the way to the chapter 11 filing case to nail down intent; am I right?

      --

      Babar

  12. Thievery. by saintlupus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, if this "Akron-based company" treated their employees anything like my last employer did, it's no surprise. We were told three months ahead of time that we were being laid off, and then security guards were stationed inside the building to watch us all the time.

    Nothing quite like making your employees feel like criminals when it comes to making them want to steal things.

    --saint

    (I know, this is probably chock full o' poor grammar. I just got to work and I'm working on my first cup of coffee. Deal with it.)

  13. Re:Jeezuz... by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're right Michael - it's okay to steal and loot because some employers can't afford to make their payroll.

    Uhh, CmdrTaco? Better keep an eye on Michael when Andover starts running out of cash...

  14. Double standard by ZanshinWedge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever an employer fucks up a pension plan, or terminates someone without good reason it's always "a shame". But whenever an employee walks away with a printer you can buy for 100 bucks on eBay after their severance package has been cancelled and their pay check bounced, it's "a criminal act".

  15. Re:exaggerated losses -- by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 5, Funny

    One computer: $2,000
    One oscilloscope: $43,549
    Having your story linked to Slashdot: $PRICELESS

    For some bankrupcies, there are severance checks. And for others, fivefingerdiscount.

    Fivefingerdiscount. It's everything you want to have.

  16. Much ado about nothing by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article is misleading and sensationalistic.

    The most common items stolen from tech companies by employees are laptops and handheld computers that cost less than $1,500 per item, asset managers say. But they are also seeing an increase in big-ticket theft.
    The writer gives ZERO facts in support of this.

    One anecdote cites someone who lifted $445,549 of equipment
    The anecdote refers to a MOTOROLA (hardly a dot-bomb) employee. The employee used his "security clearance" to steal a lot of stuff; I'd infer that there were multiple thefts over time while still employed. Either that or Motorola is too stupid to disable employees' access cards when they fire them, or maybe their security guards let people cart out half a million dollars' worth of equipment whenever they feel like it.

    The second largest number mentioned is $100,000...
    somebody had cut a hole through the wall and stolen $100,000 worth of computers.
    This is a flat-out case of robbery robbery. The writer carefully worded it to make it look to a casual reader like an ex-employee had stolen it but gives ZERO evidence for this proposition.

    The only news here isn't news...laptops and PDAs walk off. If you call someone and say "Don't bother coming back," they'll take you at your word, even if they've got a company laptop at home.

  17. I've been wrong all along... by pongo000 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "They may have difficulty blaming themselves when they get laid off, so they direct their anguish at the company."


    And all this time, I thought it was OK to blame someone else for getting laid off. Now I come to find it was actually my fault all along.


    Guess I ought to give them back their laptop.

  18. Don't wait around. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've been hired for your intelligence, use it. There are several ways to tell when its time to leave your company.

    1) You work for a DSL Provider thats NOT a bell Leave now.

    2) You see your company on FuckedCompany.com.

    3) Your stock is delisted, OR your IPO Is "Indefinately put on hold".

    4) Your company starts to buy metal folding chairs instead of Areons, saving ~$575.00/ea

    5) You have to start *gasp* PAYING for your cokes.

    6) You work for a dot-com with an unreasonable business model - I.E. Sending a $4 20 Lb bag of furball litter, overnight priority mail.

    7) Your CEO's last job was "PC Technician"

    8) Your company holds "Effective Resume Writing" classes or begins offering discounted copies of "Knock 'em Dead".

    9) You see a copy of "7 Habits of highly unemployed people" laying on your bosses desk.

    Theres more. But if you see any of the above, its a pretty good sign you need to move on.

  19. Saw this so many times... by supabeast! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked at one of the massive web consulting shops, and watched it go from 10,000 to about 50 employees before I finally got the golden shitcan award in July. A list of things I saw people steal follows:

    -Aeron Chairs
    -Dell Servers
    -Compaq Servers
    -Dell desktops
    -Cisco hubs and switches
    -Sun desktops
    -A pool table.
    -Microsoft Natural Keyboards
    -Speakers
    -Electronic foot massagers (Really.)
    -Books
    -Any software package known to man
    -Laptops
    -DLT Cartridges
    -Any SCSI equipment you could imagine.

    I could probably make this list longer, but I doubt anyone wants to read it.

  20. Working for free by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I want to know is why people worked for free so long in the first place? I know when my paycheck comes, and if I don't get paid, I don't work. It's as simple as that. I work because I get paid. Why did these people continue to work? That seems like a pretty damn stupid idea. I'd rather sit at home in my PJ's, watching TV and sending out my resume then go into work for free. (And in fact, I was forced to do this once).

  21. Re:Unusual item for sale ... by NoseyNick · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth exactly ZERO, as you should know. You can't charge for IP addresses. You can charge an admin fee for the application/assignment process, you can charge for routing them, you can charge for providing transit to them, but you can't charge for the IP addresses themselves. Furthermore, they're not transferable, you'd have to return them to RIPE/ARIN and get them re-allocated.

    --
    Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
  22. Death March Projects by scoove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So some companies can also get used to people producing at maxed out levels of production.

    I just came out of a Death March culture/company. 2.8 years of ever increasing fantasy expectations (what they wanted us to do) combined with ever decreasing fulfillment of contractual obligations (what they did with respect to their contracts to their employees).

    Vacation became regarded early on as "theft from the company" - and was denied. Taking a sick day was regarded with significant suspicion.

    Performance incentives (rewards for completing impossible death march projects) were tossed out - and amazingly, the teams would nail them. At the last second, the company's controller would interfer with one of the last steps (like authorizing a leased line to be ordered) and wala... the team would miss the deadline by hours and lose the bonus. Typical 'Lucy taking the football away' behavior.

    Then salaries were reduced by 25% "to make the business plan look better to investors" (while senior management still drove leased bullet-proof mercedes, lotuses, ferarris and such) with the 25% to be paid at year end as a balloon payment (don't ever try this, friends!). Except guess what never showed up at year end? Then that was used to string you along to stay at the company - sort of a reverse option: "Quit and you'll never see the $50K+ we owe you!"

    Then payroll started slipping. Most of the sane left then. Those who stayed worked for several months without paychecks - buying the promises of great riches. They got booted finally - firing the entire technology office in another part of the country without leaving anyone to control the assets. Their plan? Threaten the just-fired employees to work for free and inventory and package up the goods for shipping, or be accused of stealing anything that goes missing. "If you don't come in next week and ship it to us and something is missing, you know who the investigators will believe kept it."

    Many of the former employees held onto items for collateral. Can you blame them? "Pay up the cash you owe and we'll release the equipment back to you." In the various colo centers the company used, the colo venders are using the same approach with respect to getting the past-due bills paid: pay us and we release your equipment.

    So what's wrong with this?

    *scoove*

  23. The law in Canada... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3

    I don't know what the law says in the States, but in Canada if you are owed wages, the directors of the company are still liable, even after bankruptcy, and the powers that be (Labour Relations etc.) will conduct forensic audits and go after personal assets of the directors to recover your wages. They even have the power examine and negate transfers of property that are done with the express purpose of hiding financial assets. So if your shyster VC had put his property in his kid's name or set up a shell company, it wouldn't "protect" him and you would still get paid. It takes a while and you have to make some noise, but the only way you won't get paid is if there really are no assets left to seize.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:The law in Canada... by nlvp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't know if it is the same in Canada, but in the UK, you don't get to choose what order you pay people in, the law covering liquidation of insolvent businesses states what order creditors come in, and employees are not at the top of the list (although they still come before shareholders).


      The law very clearly states that you liquidate all assets (including laptops etc) at the best price you can get within a short timeframe, and you pay the creditors off in the order stipulated by the law.


      If an employee is stealing goods from a bankrupt company, they are not stealing from the shareholders or from the VC, but from the creditors that came before them (unless the VC's investment is in the form of cash debt as opposed to equity, at which point he will have a higher position in the payment order).


      There are very sound financial reasons for why this order of payment is considered right. Primarily because if you ask someone to take a purely financial risk in a business (ie Debt but no say in the running of the company or selling them goods or services on credit), then a failure to ensure that they get their money back early within the framework of a liquidation, will make them unwilling to finance this kind of investment in the first place.


      Dot coms were not the victim, by and large, of bad management. They were based on poor investment in the first place as their assumptions about market size were over-reaching from the very beginning. People who chose to dump promising careers in established industry, or chose to not go into those industries in the first place because they thought they could make more money in the dot-com sector, were taking exactly the same risk as equity holders. The equity holders still got paid less at liquidation than employees (equity holders come last in the list). When someone joins a company with a screwed up business model, they are choosing to enter into a risk, and have their eyes wide open. When the company fails, they get paid AFTER the liquidator and the creditors. In a company whose main asset is a "good" idea, there's no way the equipment is even going to be enough to pay off the creditors, so it's unsurprising that a number of employees have received less than (sometimes none of) the amounts outstanding to them. This always happens in liquidations, but you don't always hear of people walking off with the furniture. I don't see why any exception should be made in judging the behaviour of dot com employees when they take things that do not belong to them.


      It's a sad fact of life that when a business fails, not everyone who is owed money gets paid as there isn't enough money in the bank to pay them. Being dishonest by trying to jump the queue when it's not your right is morally ambiguous at best, and criminal at worst.


      To the poster who said his VC screwed around with the assets and somehow clawed cash back - I'm not condoning the VC doing anything illegal/immoral either, so I can't comment on that, although if the VC was an equity holder, I don't see how that would allow them to get money back, unless the rules are very different there.

  24. From a 'smaller' point of view... by mindslip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I run a one-man-show which is incorporated for my protection, and of course, tax purposes.

    The articles of incorporation (Canadian law, BTW) clearly state that in the event of a bankruptcy, or similar, all money oweing to directors of the company (me), will be paid in full before other debitors.

    So, technically, if I declare bankruptcy, I could state that the company owes me $xxx,xxx.xx and hand over the company assets to myself personally, leaving nothing for the debitors.

    IANAL, but I think I've got a good one! =-)

    Does anyone use something similar, and has anyone had any personal experience putting similar rules into force? I'd really love to know what sort of a leg I have to stand on. Stuff in writing is only worth the paper it's printed on until you test it!

    mindslip

  25. "Take Stuff From Work" by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the immortal words of King Missle:

    Take stuff from work.
    It's the best way to feel better about your job.
    Never buy pens or pencils or paper.
    Take 'em from work.
    Rubber bands, paper clips, memo pads, folders -- take 'em from work.
    It's the best way to feel better about your low pay and appalling working conditions.
    Take an ashtray -- they got plenty.
    Take coat hangers.
    Take a, take a trash can.
    Why buy a file cabinet?
    Why buy a phone?
    Why buy a personal computer or word processor?
    Take 'em from work.
    I took a whole desk from the last place I worked.
    They never noticed, and it looks great in my apartment.
    Take an electric pencil sharpener.
    Take a case of white-out; you might need it one day.
    Take some from work.
    It's your duty as an oppressed worker to steal from your exploiters.
    It's gonna be an outstanding day.
    Take stuff from work.
    And goof off on the company time.
    I wrote this at work.
    They're paying me to write about stuff I steal from them.
    Life is good.