Slashdot Mirror


Search and Rescue Robots

An anonymous submitter sent in: "Interesting article on the New York Times [need an acct, blah] about the various robots currently in use to search the rubble of the WTC. Not a very technical article (expectedly). Seems to be all telepresence stuff. No mention of any autonomous devices, which is as I'd expect. Too bad we don't have a few platoons of those sony bipeds with firefighter/s&r programming to make that first response."

63 comments

  1. Foremost Post by FuckTheTaliban · · Score: -1

    My cock is semi-flaccid. Also, I like to eat Oatmeal. This is the truth. Ask the Taliban. They like to watch. Fuck off.

    1. Re:Foremost Post by Osama+Bin+Fuckwit · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Our precious slashdot trolls scream out for vengeance:

      1. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
      2. Kill all Mohammedans.
      3. Kill all Dune Coons.
      4. Kill all Rag Heads.
      5. Kill all Towelheads.
      6. Kill all Arabs.
      7. Kill all Camel Rooters.
      8. Kill all Osama Bin Laden supporters.

      Nuke their countries to hell.
      Nuke them again.
      Death to Islam.

      I piss on Mecca. I wipe my ass with the Koran. I spit upon Mohammed.

    2. Re:Foremost Post by timbloid · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Well done.

      If you were any more narrow minded, you'd generate lift when you ran...

      Idiot.

    3. Re:Foremost Post by Osama+Bin+Fuckwit · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      fuck you, who's side are you on? damn pacifist traitors.

    4. Re:Foremost Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Great, but we all know Cowboy Neal is behind it really ;-)

    5. Re:Foremost Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Cmdr Taco's maybe? Fuckwit by handle, fuckwit by nature....

    6. Re:Foremost Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      He's one of those leftist, dirt-hippy, european fucktards.

  2. Sony robots by Heph_Smith · · Score: 1

    I don't think those sony walking computers would be very suited for the rescue there. I see it as a big acomplishment for them to be able to go up stairs, let alone crawl over stuff. Give those guys enough shielding and send them into a radio active area, sure.

    1. Re:Sony robots by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Humanoid bots are probably stupid to build.

      Much more efficient would be some kind of spider bots, first with 2 or 3-jointed mechanical legs, then with many, many-jointed legs ala Matrix or Doctor Octopus type limbs, ultimately something like an elephant's trunk.

      Much more stable, plenty of redundancy, and ironically, easier to program than a 2-limb humanoid walker.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  3. Battery by MGKoch · · Score: 1

    I hope the battery of those robots work longer than the one inside my notebook. *sigh*

    1. Re:Battery by murat · · Score: 1

      i hope these robots will work with the "three laws"

    2. Re:Battery by rm-r · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If anyone is interested in something about robots, but on a some what lighter note, try this article at the BBC. It's a robot that roams farms tracking and picking up slugs- the best bit is that it is fueled by their decomposing bodies!

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    3. Re:Battery by hackman · · Score: 2

      I doubt they rely on batteries for those particular robots. Using flood lights requires a lot of power, and you would want the operational times to be in hours maybe tens of hours. I'm nearly positive they would have a tether on most of the robots that go in deep rubble, if something goes wrong you can usually use the umbilical to pull the robot back out. (Those things are expensive) Also the video transmission is much clearer (and easier) by using an umbilical.

      Additionally, the chaotic nature of the environment wouldn't be one where you could depend on getting wireless coverage easily.. it could be easy to drop into a dead spot and lose control until the coverage is somehow fixed..

      But I'm sure I made more out of this than what you were trying to mention... the run times on our bigger robots is probably 4 hours (depending), but they can't traverse rubble.

      Brett

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    4. Re:Battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they carried batteries and, when necessary, invertors in backpacks to power even the tethered vehicles. Yes, there were search lights on site, but these things were deployed at many locations within the pile. Having a cord stretching across fire lines or where the heavy equipment was digging would have been really bad.

    5. Re:Battery by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      Below is about the robot with tracks and flippers.


      I doubt they rely on batteries for those particular robots.



      Yes we do use batteries. Right now they suck. (NiCds) But we're in the middle of developing LiIon. That should give us $BIGNUM hours of life.


      I'm nearly positive they would have a tether on most of the robots that go in deep rubble, if something goes wrong you can usually use the umbilical to pull the robot back out.


      In this case, I imagine they did use a safety tether, and there is hard-line ethernet and serial on the robot. However, we've been tasked to not use a tether. We're still experimenting with various comms from wireless modems to 802.11b to even 802.11b downconverted to the military band (so we can up the power).


      Additionally, the chaotic nature of the environment wouldn't be one where you could depend on getting wireless coverage easily.. it could be easy to drop into a dead spot and lose control until the coverage is somehow fixed.


      Losing comms is something everybody in this program has been trying to tackle for the last 3 years. There are 2 methods currently used. The dumber robots backtrack along their path until it gets back into comm. The smarter ones will either backtrack, or if it was given a task before comms drop, it'll finish the task and try to re-acquire.
      --
      --Carlos V.
    6. Re:Battery by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      If anyone is interested in something about robots, but on a some what lighter note, try this article [bbc.co.uk] at the BBC. It's a robot that roams farms tracking and picking up slugs- the best bit is that it is fueled by their decomposing bodies!

      This is old news.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Kill Muslim Pigs. Exterminate Islam. Kill Them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Our prcious dad cry out for vengeance:
    1. Kill all Muslims.
    2. Kill all Mohammedans.
    3. Kill all Arabs.
    4. Kill all Towel Heads.
    5. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
    6. Kill all Dune Coons.
    7. Kill all Islam.
    8. Nuke their countries to hell.
    9. Nuke them again.
    10. Death to Islam.

    I piss on Mecca. I menstruate on the Koran. I shit on Mohammed.

  5. Another link by rm-r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the BBC has this piece on laser mapping of the rubble.

    --

    J-aims
    --
    Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  6. can't be bother with the account? try this story by rm-r · · Score: 2, Redundant

    the BBC have a piece here that doesn't require all that messing about with an account.

    --

    J-aims
    --
    Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  7. Technical Data by Tensor · · Score: 1

    Short on technical data ? try non-existing techincal data, unless you count using treads there was absolutely NO description of anything in these babies.

    It would be good for rescue operations (not for body-search ones) if the robots were equipped with a speaker/mic besides the teleprescence equipment. This way, if they found somebody alive the ppl topside could comunicate with them.
    Give them some hope.

    Are this things tethered ? or wireless ? the article shows that small tracked one without any cables sticking out, but its not operating. Cos I guess all the steel and iron would fuck up wireless comms its not like line-of-sight or some office walls between the robots and the operator. And a very powerfull tx/rx module would require a lot of juice.

    --
    T

    "If you can't improve the silence, don't speak."

    1. Re:Technical Data by Ratcrow · · Score: 1
      Regarding speaker/mic: some of the Inuktuns (including the MicroTracs) have a microphone and speakers, with a headset that the operator can wear.


      Regarding tethered/wireless: the Inuktuns are tethered. This limits their range, but makes it possible to use them continuously, and there is really no risk of losing communications (unless the tether is physically broken). Further, if needed, the robot can be retrieved by following the tether.


      The iRobot/RWI robots are wireless, and would normally be capable of running with full autonomy (i.e. they have onboard processing and a sensor suite). They are limited by their battery life, and if the wireless communications are lost (due to interference or otherwise), they may be difficult to recover. For this reason, the Inuktuns were used primarily.


      Check out

      the USF USAR page (not yet updated with WTC
      information) for more.

    2. Re:Technical Data by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      It would be good for rescue operations (not for body-search ones) if the robots were equipped with a speaker/mic besides the teleprescence equipment.



      Yes, they will have Speakers/mic. IRobot (the company who makes the chassis) has provisions for that in their upgrade path on the chassis)



      --Carlos V.

      --
      --Carlos V.
    3. Re:Technical Data by freshmkr · · Score: 1
      I worked with my college's robotics team at this year's AAAI/IJCAI robot competition. While I was working on the robotic waiter competition, we also competed in the USR contest and got a good score. Check out this NYT article for more information (I'm at top left in the first picture :-).

      Anyway, the field of robotic USR at this point is so new that a lot of interesting and very different technologies are being developed. A lot of groups use platforms that wouldn't be of great use in a real rescue situation, such as the iRobot Magellan Pros we used, simply because they're research robots designed to roll around on flat surfaces. These in particular lack sensors specifically designed for rescue use - they have a ring of sonar and infrared range sensors around them and a video camera. Others, like the Urbans used at USF, are very rugged (they are tracked and can climb things) and have very sensitive FLIR sensors for detecting people.

      Autonomy versus teleoperation was the subject of some debate at the competition last summer. The scoring for the contest was done according to an equation that rewarded for the number of people found, penalized for the number of people it took to operate the robots, and so on. The formula gave a very clear advantage to teleoperated robots: even though teleoperating is very difficult (it's not like RC cars!), it's a lot easier for a human to look at a screen and navigate/find people than it is for a robot to derive this information from the same image. In a way, this is a very pragmatic approach: we need to develop useful technologies soon. On the other hand, this contest took place at an AI conference, where naturally advancing the state of the art of machine intelligence is viewed as a pretty important goal.

      Because of the robots' differing abilities, the contest featured three seperate NIST-developed standard courses; one with flat floors, one with more challenging debris, and one with what essentially was a big pile of rubble. Our Magellans could only handle the first room; the Urbans and a huge homebrew tracked robot from the Sharif University of Technology in Tehran took the more challenging rooms.

      In any case, here (at last) is a summary of some of the technologies used in the competition:

      • Swarthmore College (us): Standard Magellan Pro wheeled research bot with a Canon pan-tilt-zoom camera on top. Final version used "semi-autonomous" guidance, where an operator would tell the robot to go to a point not too far away and the robot would go there. Big lead-acid gel batteries; PC on board did lots of processing. <gimmick>Robot could also generate red-blue stereogram images of site on operator command by rotating slowly and compiling distance data.</gimmick>
      • University of South Florida: Teleoperated Urban tracked robots with FLIR sensors. Some info. Probably lead-acid batteries, don't know about onboard processing (suspect no much).
      • Sharif University of Technology: Medium dog-sized tracked robot with binocular vision. Teleoperated by laptop or Palm. I wouldn't want to get in the way of this thing. Few or no sonars IIRC, giant lead-acid gel batteries, probably very little onboard processing.
      • University of Minnesota: Cute tube-shaped robots designed (no joke) on a DARPA grant to be shot out of a grenade launcher. Completely radio controlled; AFAIK no smarts on board. Sent wireless video feed to monitors. A spring mechanism allowed them to jump out of tight spots. DARPA doesn't let them talk about power supply, other info.
      • ?University of Utah?: A commodity approach: robots were Radio Shack RC cars with Basic STAMPs on board. While not completed at the contest, eventually they will swarm with complete autonomy around the disaster site, detect people (or other hot things) with IR sensors, and relay their position to a central controller. Power is a simple 9V battery.
      • University of Edinbugh: don't recall exactly; despite all their valiant efforts, they couldn't get anything working in time. I think they were also working on an autonomous system of two or three bots.
      All of the teleoperated robots were controlled wirelessly; none had tethers.

      Enough rambling for now. In any case, it was a really cool experience to go out to Seattle and see all the stuff the teams were trying. For me, robotics is a great, growing field that is a whole lot of fun, and the conference was one unforgettable week.

      --Tom

  8. OT: Anybody knows what happened to K5 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
    Reason: Document contains no data

    Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

    1. Re:OT: Anybody knows what happened to K5 ? by FuckTheTaliban · · Score: -1

      CmdrTaco hacked in to it. Obvious!

      The only other possibility is that a small loosly defined terrorist faction flew several large commercial planes loaded with jet fuel into K5's webserver.

      Pick one.

  9. fukshitup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    break any window. killa cop.
    puncture all tires. litter
    sloburbia. open hydrants. burn
    bldgs. scatter nails. glue
    locks. dose h20. clip phones.
    plant indo. graffititall. t.p.
    streamers. cyanide the vents.
    burn down bldgs. cancel
    technokratz. destroy private
    props. kill the rich. disrupt
    public service. send bomb
    threats. create panda moanium.
    spread rumors. break clocks.
    smash tvs. sabothe gears.
    d e s t r o y a l l s y s t e m s.
    pullallalarms. pranks. tricks.
    splatter billboards. sink ships.
    clog drains. turn itall off.
    shutitall down. busta meter.
    j a m it. runamok. tiltit.

    1. Re:fukshitup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      das ist not tröll! das ist krappenflööden!

  10. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The worst terrorist attacks in recorded history occurred just over 2 weeks ago, and you folks are discussing the various robots currently in use to search the rubble of the WTC?? My *god* people, GET SOME PRIO

    Hmmm, on second thought, this is probably appropriate. My bad; carry on, discuss this issue amongst yourselves.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Redundant? Funny, maybe. It was intended as a JOKE, you crack-addled terrorist-sympathising would-be moderator, you! THIS ABUSE OF MODERATION WILL BE CORRECTED IN META-MOD, BITCH.

  11. I love MALEWASTE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Malewaste Lover

    Climdon smulan@frech.as

    I'm a pig

    I like piss

    I like smelly uncut cocks

    I like a mans ass to be self lubricating

    Don't shower, soap or shave

    Don't take your filthy boots off

    Don't whine or tell me your problems

    Be a fucking man

    Let your stinking balls hang out

    Show me your filthy cock

    I want to spit on ya

    I want to piss my pants and rub my jeans in your face

    I want you to eat my dirty hole

    I want you to drink from my man size tool

    Grab your cock and work it

    I am

    When the time is right

    When the air is filled with sweat and piss

    When your filthy cock can't take any more

    I will grunt like a cave man

    And squirt my fucking hot load

  12. Don't make stupid comments like: 'First Response' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The quality of the news postings are sinking deeper and deeper.
    I am not very happy that the propaganda machinery of President Bush is working and everyone is suddenly shouting for war (when you think war is something 'cool' you are a BIG IDIOT).
    I hope that not all Americans are like this, because I'm slowly losing respect.
    The politics of President Bush is reminding me more and more of Hitler (seeking scapegoats and destroy them).

    Taliban surely sucks, but you should use your brain and not your butt when you're thinking about how to treat this situation.

  13. Re:Don't make stupid comments like: 'First Respons by FuckTheTaliban · · Score: -1

    I can't believe you wasted your precious time formulating that pathetic plea for pity.

    Mark my word -- the Taliban will be turned to ashes. They will be skewered from eye socket to bunghole, and then placed on a spit so that their flesh could be roasted by the searing gale of flatus which issues forth from the haunches of Asmoday.

    Exacerbating the terrorists' tortures, which include being hollowed out and used as prophylactics by thorn-cocked Gulbuth The Rampant, is the fact that they will be forced to endure such suffering in sight of the Paradise they were expecting.

    The legions of fang-wombed hags will take their pleasure on their shattered carcasses for most of this afternoon. Tomorrow, their flesh will be melted from their bones like wax in the burning embrace of the Mother of Cowards. The day after that, they'll be sodomized by the Fallen and their bowels shredded by a demonic ejaculate of burning sand. Then, on Sunday, Satan gets them all day. I can't even imagine what he's got cooked up for them.

    I dont give a fuck if you respect Americans or not. We are all like this. Anyone who says they aren't is a dickless pansy. Get used to it. American owns you.

  14. login NOT required by wickline · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://archive.nytimes.com/2001/09/27/technology/c ircuits/27ROBO.html

    This trick has been seen on slashdot before. It should be a FAQ. Editors should automatically use the archive subdomain in NYT links rather than the www subdomain.

    -matt

    1. Re:login NOT required by at_18 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also use this account:

      Username: slash2001
      Password: slash2001

      Let's see how long it will work, after 1.000 people start using it

    2. Re:login NOT required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Editors should automatically use the archive subdomain in NYT links rather than the www subdomain.

      Otherwise, editors should not post links to sites which are not available.

    3. Re:login NOT required by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      /. doesn't post the direct link because they could be sued by nytimes for linking to their sub-domain. If it is the poster that does that, they hold no liability, because it is someone else. Doesn't anyone see that is why they never do it, and ask others to do it?

    4. Re:login NOT required by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Liable for linking to something that is publically available, i.e. addressable? No fraud is used, like embedding a name and password.

      I hope laws don't change to make linking illegal.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    5. Re:login NOT required by fava · · Score: 1

      Anyone else notice that on Sep 11 when the nytimes .com servers were struggling to keep up with the demand that the one page that popped up quickly was the registration page?

    6. Re:login NOT required by NTSwerver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...or this one:

      Username: password
      Password: password

      Guessed after two attempts - can you guess what the first attempt was? ;-)

      --
      -----------------------
      Moderator's essentials
    7. Re:login NOT required by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      I hope laws don't change to make linking illegal.

      Unfortunately, if the already issued opinion of a certain judge in the 2600 case isn't overruled, the laws won't have to change...

  15. Re:Don't make stupid comments like: 'First Respons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Glass the taliban. America rules.

  16. Re:Don't make stupid comments like: 'First Respons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I bet you even didnt know who Taliban was, before this happened. You're just another 'lemming' who follows the masses.

  17. mobile robot teleoperation by hackman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a really interesting opportunity for some high-tech to be applied to a real non-military situation. Robin Murphy came here to UCSD and talked a few months ago, and she actually brought (and we got to drive) the tracked one with the flippers in front.

    Those things are not easy to drive. One of the most difficult things is getting a perspective on where the robot is in relation to it's surroundings (very rough rubble). This is an ongoing research area for many robotics teams, and one we have been working on also.

    The submitter mentioned something about autonomous robots, I think they don't fully understand the difficulty of the problem which robotics researchers are working on. Navigating uneven building wreckage autonomously is an incredibly difficult problem, in general. Especially under the conditions of the WTC rubble. There may be some small parts of the process which can be automated, but I doubt it would be useful in this situation anyway. They were using the robots as probes to discover what was inside areas where it was dangerous for people to be there, so a human is already "in the loop". The real use of these systems is for remote visualization (i.e. show me what's in there) in hard to reach areas.

    They didn't specify what types of cameras are being used, but this is a mostly visual problem from my understanding. Most robots have standard rectilinear camera views that are forward facing, unfortunately operation of these platforms is difficult becuause of the restricted field of view and inability to see on the left, right and behind the robot. Multiple cameras helps, but adds significant complexity and disjoint views. A technology which really makes this easier is an Omni-directional Video sensor (which has a 360 deg. field of view around the sensor). These are ideal for "immersed" applications like this, and they literally give the operator a view of the entire space around the bot (except for directly overhead) and allow you to determine the robot's orientation relative to obstacles easily. The same data can also be unwarped and used to create a perspective or panoramic view of the area in real time. A pair of these and stereo software (which also has been done in our lab, [shameless plug over]) can provide a full depth-map of the area. The ODVS has the difficulty of limited resolution (same CCD, larger fov) but this can be supplemented by a Pan/Tilt/Zoom rectilinear camera.

    Really the interesting part of research in this direction is the remote operation and visualizations that help the perator navigate through the area to achieve it's goal. This is what my thesis is on, actually.

    More info: UCSD CVRR Lab The Page of Omnidirectional Vision and our source of ODVS. Also check Vstone (in Japanese, may need to run that last one through babelfish or something).

    Mobile Robots are cool. We even have one that pulls cables for us in the drop-ceiling of our lab... we're slowly working on a web-page for that new one.. I have a cool video for it already but it's HUGE (100M or so). Anyway, I'll shut up.


    Brett
    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    1. Re:mobile robot teleoperation by Canis+Lupus · · Score: 1

      I actually did some research on this very topic (I was a student of Dr. Murphy while she was at the Colorado School of Mines). I have tried operating some of these very robots. Not an easy task at all.

      My research focused on using AI to assist the operator, for example, in very cluttered environment with many sharp corners, the robot would automatically lower its top speed. Other people I worked with, were researching AI assisted tele-presence.

      I am torn that this research is being put to use. Kind of like knowing first-aid; you are glad you know what to do and glad to help, but hope like hell you never have to apply it.

      --
      The real silver bullet to good programs is caffeine; lots and lots of caffeine! *twitch, twitch*
    2. Re:mobile robot teleoperation by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      I'm on the JPL portion of TMR. TMR stands for Tactical Mobile Robotics and is the DARPA program headed by Lt. Col. John Blitch before he retired. Its the tracked robot with flippers in the front. The chassis is made by IRobot and JPL is doing the Sensors/Autonomous behavior portion of the program. You can see last year's effort on the previous version of the chassis at our website: http://robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/tasks/tmr

      Those things are not easy to drive. One of the most difficult things is getting a perspective on where the robot is in relation to it's surroundings (very rough rubble). This is an ongoing research area for many robotics teams, and one we have been working on also.


      Yes, they are very difficult and disconcerting at first. It does take training. One of our most difficult long distance runs was with the operator out of sight of the robot and the robot having to navigate through a forested area, go to a tower across a parking lot using cover, and climb up a set of stairs. The hard part were the questions, "Where am I?" and "Where can I go?" The operator had to depend heavily on the 360 degree view camera and the computer bread-crumb trail to figure out where he was and where to go, but the question of traversal across obstacles.



      With a simple black-and-white camera it is hard to tell what's out there. Is there something behind that grass? Is it a rock, a hole? or a log that can high-center us? Now roll in trying to do that autonomously. The computer can see the clump of grass, but if its thick enough, it'll see it as an obstacle instead of something it can just roll over. And even if it knows it can roll over it, it can't see if there are any obstacles hidden in the grass. We're trying to use laser scanners and radars to try to solve that problem.


      Multiple cameras helps, but adds significant complexity and disjoint views. A technology which really makes this easier is an Omni-directional Video sensor (which has a 360 deg. field of view around the sensor).



      Yup, we have one of those from a company called Remote Reality. Nifty items. The one with the hole in the center of the picture gives the best resolution at the horizon. 180 degree fisheyes don't give the hole in the center, but suck at resolution on the horizon.



      --Carlos V.

      --
      --Carlos V.
  18. They ought to use... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    those yappy little Aibos! Small, mobile, autonomous. Add a speaker and microphone, and you can talk to survivors while they pet the 'bot and watch it do tricks.

    Better yet, the operators can cry, "Let slip the dogs of war!" or "release the hounds!" when they deploy them.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  19. Re:Kill Muslim Pigs. Exterminate Islam. Kill Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I like bombs.
    I hate Jesus.
    They should have nuked us.
    They should have nuked us all to bloody hell.
    Bin Laden Will Prevail Against All Who Oppose!!!

    You Piss On Mecca, I Burn a Flag.
    You Shit on Mohammed, I Spill My Seed On The Rotting Corpse Of Christ.
    As more churchs burn, I laugh.

  20. Another version by Eccles · · Score: 2

    You can also look at Wired's version here, with a few more pics than NYT.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  21. Sony Bipeds? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    You mean the 1.5 foot tall ones with little nuts for hands? I don't think they could lift anything to look for a person under it...

  22. It could be worse by oneiros27 · · Score: 2
    It least they comments haven't degenerated to 'yeah, but could it take Biohazard or Vlad the Impaller?'

    [Yes, yes, I know, Vlad lost early on this season, but it's still a well known 'bot. And I still think Biohazard should have won the decision].

    I'm also surprised that no one compared the robots to the search dogs they have working. [Can work longer hours, with just a battery change out, can be built faster than it takes to train a dog, can be sent into more dangerous areas without fear of killing it [as it was never alive], etc].

    Flame me later for the MSNBC link, but they had a good article on the use of dogs earlier this week:
    http://www.msnbc.com/news/633727.asp


    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:It could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm also surprised that no one compared the robots to the search dogs they have working. [Can work longer hours, with just a battery change out, can be built faster than it takes to train a dog, can be sent into more dangerous areas without fear of killing it [as it was never alive], etc].

      And you forgot the most important advantage: they won't artificially deflate the body (part) count...

  23. Re:can't be bother with the account? try this stor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heres an idea - why not register with FAKE info? Hell yeah, Im a 50 yr Afghan woman earning $500k/yr.

  24. Robots and A.I. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm working my but of to get a grip on PROLOG.
    When reading this I wonder if there might even be a future for this horrible but efficient (hmm borg tech?) AI language?

  25. Re:can't be bother with the account? try this stor by rm-r · · Score: 2

    It's not an issue about people having my info, it's all the effort of typing something in. And quite frankly, whats the problem with pointing out a similar story? (that was published a week ago incidently)

    --

    J-aims
    --
    Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  26. Build your own... by nyjx · · Score: 2, Informative
    The long running Robo Cup Soccer challenge (Robocup.org) started a search and rescue competition a after one of those involved died in the Kobe earthquake:

    href="http://www.r.cs.kobe-u.ac.jp/robocup-rescue

    you can build your own coordinated team of virtual robots to work in a simulated disaster zone + there are some search and rescue competitions using real robots. There's a download page for the simulators and disaster toolkits.

    --
    .sig
  27. Re:can't be bother with the account? try this stor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't redundant- the two BBC stories are different pieces

  28. Other technologies were requested by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine works in the acoustics lab at a nearby university. Not long after the attack, they received a request to build a device that would allow rescuers to find people in the rubble by listening for breathing or cries for help that couldn't be heard otherwise. The team did get something together for this and went up to the site, but they never got to try it out.

    This was a couple days after the attack and rescue workers had pretty much given up on survivors at that point (though the media continued to report otherwise). According to my friend, when he got there, the police and firefighters were concentrating the search on finding their own guys and had pretty much given up on finding anyone else.

    He said that it took about 6 hours to get cleared to go onto the site itself, and then, after that, you were put in a queue to use the site for your task (searching, removing rubble, et cetera). They were bumped twice before being told they weren't going to be used, so the device never had a field test, but none of the team complained. They were in complete awe of the scene itself, and, while they ultimately felt helpless, they felt privileged just to be there and to speak with other crews and native New Yorkers. They managed to get some audio recordings of the area as well, thinking it might be important for historical reasons.

  29. Other S&R Robots by superflex · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, they wouldn't be much help in the WTC situation, where everything is buried under tons of rubble, but there are some really amazing things being done in the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International International Aerial Robotics Competition. My school has had a team for a few years, and they kick ass. The goal: Autonomous flying robots with vision, image recognition, hazard avoidance, and more. This stuff is frickin cool.

    --
    sigs are for suckers
  30. Link to one of the robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A former employer:

    http://www.inuktun.com/vgtv.htm

  31. platoons of robots and their uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think that a rapid response team of robots to be deployed in all these pisshole extremist countries would be fantastic. Most of the Arab countries are actually backing out now... let me get this straight? Innocent civilians are targeted by madmen. Madmen seem to be working for Big MadMan that claims such attrocities are in God's name (Allah is merely Arabic for God right?) If Islam is trully against this, then it is then invalidated as a religous cause. Then we have countries taking the murderers side. Hmmm, interesting.

    I suppose if I mug you, and rape your wife that I and my friends could then press charges against you later if you try to testify against me? How consistent! At least China is backing its techs out that are improving Iraq's weaponry. Gee, thanks China. Maybe next you could adopt a policy to not directly aid violent imperialistic coutries that target civilians and wish to commit genocide in the future?

  32. Young Usamah plays it safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    The beginnings of the bin Laden phenomenon are difficult to track down. The bin Laden family first appears when Sheik Mohammed bin Laden, a native of the Sunni Hadramout, emigrated from Yemen to Saudi Arabia in the 1960's. The clan appears to have gradually congealed power around itself, and forged a close relationship with the Saudi royal family, being granted all rights to construction of a religious nature, whether in Mecca, Medina or the Holy Palaces of Jerusalem (until 1967). The bin Ladens renovated Mecca after the royal house was highly satisfied with their work on the palaces. In any event, the bin Ladens established a financial empire that now reaches far beyond mere construction work. The bin Laden clan and the Saudi royal house soon had a very close working relationship, one not just based on finances, but on friendship and shared secrets as well. When young Usamah was growing up, he was ensconsed in the Saudi establishment, going to the same schools and colleges as the luminaries of the Arabian peninsula. Indeed, bin Ladens went to Victoria College in Alexandria, the Eton of the Middle East, where they rubbed shoulders with such excellencies as King Hussein of Jordan and Omar Sharif.

    Usamah was born in 1957 in Riyadh. His father took many wifes, and young Usamah was born to one of the last and least respected of them. He was the 17th son of a reported 50 sired by Mohammed. Mohammed's brother and partner sired 50 more, making the bin Laden clan and influence huge. The fact that Usamah came to outshine them all is a testament to his innate genius.

    Usamah as a young boy, on holiday in Sweden aged 14. His 'pale good looks' shone through already. Click here to view.

    Earliest direct evidences of Usamah himself this reporter could track down are recollections by an old teacher, Brian Fyfield-Shayler. In 1969, whilst his decadent western peers were guzzling drugs and descending into an orgy of self, the callow bin Laden, just 13, was studying hard at Al-Thaghr, a school in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia modelled on the English public school system. Mr Fyfield-Shayler said (in this respected news source) "I remember him as quiet, retiring and rather shy. He was very courteous - more so than any of the others in his class. Physically, he was outstanding because he was taller, more handsome and fairer than most of the other boys. He also stood out as he was singularly gracious and polite, and had a great deal of inner confidence. He was very neat, very precise and very conscientious."

    There can be no doubt that Usamah, an ordinary and pious young man, was deeply affected by his family's involvement in rebuilding the two holy Mosques in Mekkah and Madinah. We have already heard that his early teacher thought him a confident but reflective individual, so we shouldn't be surprised if he felt great pride that his family was involved in raising the glory of Allah in such spiritually significant places.

    Throughout the 1970's Usamah spent his time studying and working for the family business. Doubtless he kept an eye on current affairs ? the disgraceful behaviour of Israel and America during this period is remarkable ? but he was determined to get his degree and be a credit to his family. In 1979 he graduated from King Abdul Aziz University in Jeddah with a degree in Civil Engineering.

    BEGINNING OF THE LEGEND

    Usamah as a handsome young man in the Mujahideen. Shortly after young Usamah graduated, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to prop up the failing Communist regime. The Mujahideen put out an international call for help, and Usamah was inspired to leave the dusty world of commerce for more noble pursuits. He packed himself and several family bulldozers off to Afghanistan, and later was quoted as saying "In our religion, there is a special place in the Hereafter for those who participate in Jihad. One day in Afghanistan was like 1000 days of praying in an ordinary mosque."

    Usamah made a huge difference to the Mujahideen. At first he was an effective politician and strategist. He recruited thousands of Arab fighters in the Gulf, paid for their passage to Afghanistan, and set up camps to train them. He designed defences along the Pakistani border, driving a bulldozer himself and taking great risks from Soviet helicopter gunship strafings as a result. Such was the personal stake he felt that before long he had taken up a Kalashnikov and was fighting on the front personally. This personal touch emerged again in 1986 when he and a few dozen Arab helpers fought off a Soviet onslaught in a small town called Jaji, near the Pakistani border. This ignited the Afghani resolve, as it was the first example that the Russians could actually be beaten. Just twelve months later he turned the tide of the Afghanistan war with a brilliant offensive against Soviet troops in the battle of Shaban. The Mujahideen suffered heavy casualties in the vicious, heavy fighting, but thanks to bin Laden's superb generalship the Soviets were pushed out of the area for good and the end was in sight for the Communists.

    Hamza Mohammed, a Palestinian volunteer in Afghanistan, recalls "He was a hero to us because he was always on the Front Line, always moving ahead of everyone else. He not only gave his money, but he also gave himself. He came down from his palace to live with the Afghan peasants and the Arab fighters. He cooked with them, ate with them, dug trenches with them. That was Bin Laden's way."

    By the late 1980's Usamah had established himself as a legend across all Afghanistan. It was at this time that his close personal friendship with the Taliban Mullah Mohammad Omar began. The Wahhabi brand of Islam they both share is somewhat similar to Protestantism, but in an Islamic context, and they are both very spiritual men. To this day they take reflective fishing trips in the backlands of their country, such is their binding friendship. Where the rest of the Islamic world has been corrupted by decadent Western ways, the Wahhabis stick to traditional Islam as taught in the Koran. They are amongst the very holiest and most pious of Muslims, their creed established in Saudi Arabia, to an extent, and also Afghanistan, which though not strictly a Wahhabi state is very closely modelled on one. A measure of his piety is that he selflessly rejected an offer from King Fahd of Saudi Arabia to expand the Prophet's mosque in Medinah. This cosy little deal would have pocketed Usamah a lovely $90 million, but he refused as he correctly recognised it as an attempt to lure him from Jihad against the communists.

    RETURN TO THE HOMELAND

    Usamah today, careworn and wise with experience. Usamah returned to Saudi Arabia in the late eighties, a celebrity throughout the Muslim world. Convinced by the words of the holy Koran, Usamah soon set aside his own personal, selfish best interests and began to campaign for the Saudi government to introduce Shariah (Islamic Law) and reduce its terrible corruption, an offence to Allah in the land of Mekkah. Although this was to get him into trouble with the corrupt authorities on several occasions, the real shakedown occurred when King Fahd decided to allow Western troops in the Kingdom during the Gulf War. Usamah criticised the Saudi regime for this terrible decision, and was promptly hounded with a harassment campaign. Before long, in 1991, he fled to the Sudan, and shortly afterwards was declared an outlaw by the Saudi regime, which stripped him of his nationality and put a price on his head. His loyalty to the word of the Koran and his conscience had cost him his home, and reduced him to a common bandit as far as his old circles in Saudi Arabia were concerned.

    In the Sudan Usamah managed to expand his business interests considerably, and he continued his Jihad bankrolling. Always keeping a careful eye on ethical considerations, he made sure to only bankroll just causes, putting money on the underdog and the concept of right V might:

    Chechnya. Here the Russians have sought to destroy all hope of Chechnian independance, but as usual bin Laden is involved, helping fund the Chechen guerrila fighters against the superior enemy. A noble cause.

    Muslim Bosnians against the Serb overseers. Despite the justness of this cause, the US interfered, arresting the fighters he sent to help the cause of freedom against oppression. Nonetheless, bin Laden had a big impact there, as he does everywhere.

    Palestine. bin Laden has always been outraged by the plight of the Palestinians. At a young age he came under the tutilege of a Palestininian man, Sheikh Abdallah Azzam, who was once a confidant of Yasser Arafat but had become disenchanted with the PLO. Some Usamah became intertwined with Palestinian politics and the cause.

    Yemen. Usamah has long had links to the Yemen Wahhabi cause. He has also been involved in the struggle there - the bombing of the USS Cole was possibly an example of this (unlike the WTC, this bombing fits bin Laden's MO - the target was military, not involving innocent civilians.

    Everyone of these causes was Just and right, and it is no wonder that Usamah's reputation only grew and prospered during this period ? and no wonder that an assassination attempt was made at this time, though he escaped with only some injuries.

    AFGHANISTAN ONCE MORE

    In 1996 Usamah moved permanently back to Afghanistan. In despair at the terrible situation in both Saudi Arabia and the Sudan, he sought a more traditional and devout setting. After Saudi Arabia decided to imprison Islamic scholars and hundreds of Mujahideen youths, after the rape of the Holy Land by the West and the occupation of the two Holy Places by American troops, Usamah decided to make a stand. He issued his first Bayan, or statement, 'A Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places'. This document was seminal, and simple ? a lucid warning instructing the Americans to leave the land of the two Holy Places or face military attack from the Mujahideen, the same Mujahideen that defeated the largest superpower in the world under his tutelage some few years before in Afghanistan.

    "Muslims burn with anger at America. For its own good, America should leave [Saudi Arabia]."

    Usamah is still in Afghanistan to this day. Despite the total lack of any evidence (The US claims to have evidence, but with it's usual broohaha is prepared to go to war rather than publically release it. It is so convincing they will give it to allies but not to the Taleban, from whom they expect an extradition with no evidence at all) relating him to the recent WTC attacks, he is castigated worldwide for this devilish act. Usamah may be no friend of the United States, and with good reason, but he has no record of attacking innocent civilian targets. He is an honourable man and an honourable fighter, with a long, proud record of fighting for the oppressed (but right) underdog.

    So why must he die?

    Because he must be martyred. It is my belief that Usamah has reached his peak. Already approaching his 50's, he can't continue his brave fight against Western imperialism forever. Already he is weakening, his judgement is failing and his body shrivels. Every Muslim who dies in Jihad is guaranteed a place in Heaven, and Usamah, in dying, can both guarantee his own elevation and strike a blow against the western imperial forces trying to paint him as some sort of extremist. If he martyrs himself, a thousand new and young Usamahs will be inspired by his legend and continue the good fight, and the truth about bin Laden will spread around the world, and so the simple peoples of this globe will hear of his valiant life and fight. When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, the USA boycotted the Moscow Olympics, western opinion was outraged, and President Jimmy Carter embargoed all exports to the Soviet Union. Contrary to popular belief, the USA did not funnel military or financial support to the Mujahideen, however. In this interview bin Laden recalls "Personally neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help", so we see that the Americans were all mouth but had no guts. Now that America has, with it's usual hypocricy, decided to attack Afghanistan, it is clear that Usama must take risks to ensure maximum damage is applied to the enemy.

    WHAT USAMAH MUST DO

    Firstly he must provide tantalising glimpses of himself, drawing the Americans into Afghanistan. He must make sure the common people of Afghanistan understand that the Americans are out to culturally reprogram the Afghanis, one of the last pure peoples of the Earth. He must extract maximum damage upon the enemy in exchange for his own life. No superpower, however strong, can, once entered, come out of Afghanistan with honour. Hopefully the plight of Afghanistan and the indiscriminate killing of civilians that will occur there will reignite the Wahhabi cause throughout the Arab world, but especially in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. There is a great, noble chance here for the Middle East to be reawakened in its old image.

    Usamah made Afghanistan in his own image, it is thanks to his influence that it has steered a course away from the brutality and violence of communism, towards the status of a pure Muslim state. The Taliban, unlike the governments of Yemen, Iran and Saudi Arabia, is not corrupted by Western influence, and will not hand him over. The West knows it has a resolute enemy. Even in the unlikely even that they did decide to hand him over, they would be unnable to, and surely the Afghans would revolt and a new revolution would be needed.

    The likelihood is that they shall be true to the tenets of Islam, and not hand over Usamah. Then, the US and other Western allies will be forced to invade Afghanistan, where they will meet a bloody end. Usamah must sacrifice himself in the process, for it is the best way of guaranteeing his place in heaven and exacting maximum pain upon the enemy.

    It is my fervent hope that bin Laden realise his death is called for, that his own death is a weapon he can use far more powerful than any bomb. The legend will burn out brightly.

  33. Re:login NOT required-archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should point out that that doesn't always work.

    The links to the lidar story for example.