Slashdot Mirror


Review: Training Day

The first hour of Training Day showcases a great actor strutting his stuff in a surprising film with an original premise. Denzel Washington (Det. Alonzo Harris) is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Jake Hoyt (Ethan Hawke) to the dark side. But, inexplicably and sadly, the movie suddenly falls right off the cliff, degenerating into a dumb, improbable, almost cartoonishly violent mess. Spoilage warning: plot is discussed, but not ending.

It's great to see Denzel Washington playing a bad guy, and especially impressive to see him as messes with the mind of his eager young partner Jake. Washington is dazzling -- alternately charming, surprising, angry, powerful and savvy. He laughs, cajoles, taunts, tempts and psyches out his younger prey. He's electric, keeping the audience continuously off guard. Jake Hoyt is along for his first day's training to work as an undercover cop, a job he hopes will lead to promotions and more money for his wife and new baby. Set against the backdrop of the ugly and real-life corruption scandals still wracking the Los Angeles Police Department (already battered by years of racial tensions and accusations of brutality), he and Alonzo set out in a souped-up Monte Carlo to ride the mean streets of LA.

Hawke is also great as the eager but savvy rookie who is shocked, then horrified, as he realizes just how out-of-control, brutal and corrupt his new partner is, and how insistent Alonzo is on drawing him into the quagmire of corruption and brutality that underlie the older cop's world. Even though Hoyt knows better from the first, Alonzo is so powerful he can't quite walk away. The movie would have been so much better off if they'd just left the main story line at that, but that no longer seems possible in the looney-tunes world of big-profit studio marketing ambitions.

Training Day quickly degenerates. The "ghetto" scenes are garish, crude, nearly racist stereotypes of life in the big city. Every black or Hispanic kid under 40 is packing and shooting. The elaborate white-men police corruption conspiracies driving the plot were done much better in Chinatown and L.A. Confidential. Hoyt's answer to his increasingly nightmarish predicament is as unsatisfying as it is puzzling and unclear. And a silly plot twist featuring a Russian mafia with enough firepower to take ot the Taliban is inane. I'd highly recommend seeing this movie to anyone who wants to see a great actor strut his stuff for a good hour. Mid-way through, though, you might want to do yourself a favor, finish your popcorn and just go home.

122 comments

  1. Heh. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

    Another great review, brought to you by the one and only Jon.

    1. Re:Heh. by SilentChris · · Score: 2

      If you have a problem with the man, TURN OFF HIS ARTICLES in your user's settings. God.

    2. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just like to add to that that even if you do not have a problem with the man, it still helps to turn off his articles. FWIW, HTH.

    3. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, as i'm sure you [the all-knowing slashdot god] know, even *with* the katz filter his stories slip through now and again.

    4. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^

      |___ mod parent up! Jon is an IDIOT!

  2. Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Cheesy_Poof_Man · · Score: 1

    well, does it?

    1. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a yes or a no?

    2. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't know where the WTC actually is. Find that out, and you'll find the answer to your question.

    3. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What type of Monte? The good 80s Super Sport ones (they look almost as good as Buick's '87 Grand National's) or the shitty reincarnation? Or going back even further, maybe a late 60s/early 70s Monte with a 350?

    4. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At no time does the WTC appear in the LA skyline ... of course it didn't before 9/11 either.

    5. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, learn some geography; wtc is NOT in los angeles...

    6. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Mid 70's maybe? Looks kinda like this: http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/chevrolet- montecarlo/images/chevrolet-montecarlo-1974a.jpg

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    7. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they did a very good job of removing the WTC from the LA skyline, its as if it was never there...

    8. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was filmed in L.A. Unless it cuts out the low-rise L.A. office of the WTC, then no.

    9. Re:Does it cut out the WTC out of the skyline? by iceburn · · Score: 1

      There's nothing cooler than a 1st gen Monte with the 350 ripped out and a Rat 454 or 396 shoved under the hood. Damn cool cars, I tells ya. I used to own a '72, 350 4bbl Holley, Posi-Traction, bright yellow, and a lot of neat guages inside (all factory). The only things I added were the carb and a warm cam, and that thing could burn 'em like none other. heh, cars were much better in the good old days.

      --
      A sphincter says what?
  3. Read a real review of the movie on Salon by YouAreFatMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to read a real movie review, Salon has a well done review of "Training Day" that actually discusses the merits of the film and will be much more useful in deciding whether you want to see the movie or not. Jon's reviews always sound like he didn't see the movie, but had someone else tell him the plot.

    --
    Robotiq.com is heavily tested on animals
    1. Re:Read a real review of the movie on Salon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great review. why the hell does this jon katz guy even review movies anymore? he seriously sucks at it.

  4. Give me a break! by shri · · Score: 1
    But, inexplicably and sadly, the movie suddenly falls right off the cliff, degenerating into a dumb, improbable, almost cartoonishly violent mess. Spoilage warning: plot is discussed, but not ending.


    Err .... the sad part was that it did not give me any further reason to read the review. It was a spoiler for a spoiler review.
  5. Katz, sorry I have to say that by WildBeast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but what's happening, those reviews portray you more like a rookie writer who uses the old and trusted writing techniques learned in school. Where's the creativity, the magic, the uniqueness, the "je ne sais quoi" that sets you apart from the others? On the other hand, I guess doing a review of that kind of movie can't be too inspiring.

  6. Bummer. by ThesQuid · · Score: 1

    Maaaaan, is there going to be anything worth going to the theaters for this year? This has been one of Hollywood's worst years yet. Here's hoping LOTR will make up for it.

    1. Re:Bummer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of it is simply that standards have gotten higher. Seriously I watch movies of years ago and I find them unbelievably unbelievable (:-)), horrible acting and film work, bad soundtracks, and just plain dumb. And these were well rated.

    2. Re:Bummer. by cREW+oNE · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that you can't find great movies out there doesn't mean there aren't any. There have been some great cinematic experiences this year.

      (Most of them not from hollywood though.)

      --

      +++ATH0

    3. Re:Bummer. by Grab · · Score: 2

      And hopefully Harry Potter. Although the marketing crap for HP has started already (HP dolls, trading cards, even _shoes_ for crissakes!) which makes me worried. Last heavily-marketed film was "Jar-Jar's Big Adventure"... :-(

      Check out "Enigma" though - that's pretty good, although fairly lightweight. Not Hollywood either, so you can feel good about spending your money on something not linked to huge corrupt organisations.

      Grab.

  7. Ebert Sez: by Kaio · · Score: 3, Informative

    In that vein, here's Ebert's review. I'm sorry to say that I trust Ebert's opinions more than Katz's, as they more often reflect my own. He (Ebert) gave it his fairly common three-star rating, so I think it's probably worth watching as a rental.

  8. After the first hour... by christurkel · · Score: 1

    It is like they have two scripts and just put them together. The first hour is great; just like you see in the trailers. Dark and powerful. Then the movie changes into some bad Lethal Weapon clone. Its odd and startling.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:After the first hour... by nyquist_theorem · · Score: 1

      ...sounds just like Hollow Man. An hour into it I was like "hmm, neat idea, let's see where they take it!" and then, as if someone had swapped scripts half-way thru, the movie went south, FAST. At least I didn't pay to see it (lord love divx)...

      --
      -- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
    2. Re:After the first hour... by grammar+nazi · · Score: 2
      It is prolly a marketing trick. If they can appeal to two vastly different marketing segments, then they have a larger overall market. It doesn't matter if you think it's a great movie or if you just liked one half of it. If the first half appeals to you and the second half appeals to somebody else, then two poeple are mildly satisfied rather than one person liking/one person hating it.

      Remember, if you *really* liked the movie or if you just thought it was okay, the MPAA still made $7 dollars off of you. They may as well market it to every possible segment.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  9. Filthy by ksw2 · · Score: 1

    The Filthy Critic is the only one I listen to now-a-days... he's the only one who's consistently right (they all suck.)

    And, oh yeah, I just wanted to add that Katz is the worst part of Slashdot :->

    (...going to check my slashdot config for "Katz Filter"...)

    1. Re:Filthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed the filty critic doth rock.

    2. Re:Filthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hate JonKatz you'll love this. It's my homepage!

    3. Re:Filthy by ksw2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      I'm blind!!!!

    4. Re:Filthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the Katz filter should be on by default. People should have to specify that they want this crap.

  10. How does slashdot do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do the stories go so wildly back and forth between "These people want to take our freedoms!" to "ooooh.. look at the pretty movies!"

    JonKatz: he watches movies. WOW!

    1. Re:How does slashdot do it. by Snootch · · Score: 1

      How do the stories go so wildly back and forth between "These people want to take our freedoms!" to "ooooh.. look at the pretty movies!"?

      Oh, I dunno. I think it has something to do with that keyboard thing he keeps pressing...it's called being able to think about more than one thing. Anyway, if you dislike Katz so much, then jsut filter him! Me, I think he raises good points. If I don't agree, and have something meaningful to say, I can say it in the forums.

    2. Re:How does slashdot do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude the point was...These slashfags always whine about the movie industry trying to steal their freedoms with laws like the dmca and sssca and copyright extensions...but then they pop a big woody when the next half assed peice of drivel piddles out of hollywoods bloated ass crack...

  11. you are a pointless kiss-arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a pointless kiss-arse

  12. Jon, you kant recommend half a movie. by motherhead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please Jon, you are suppost to be a real grown up movie reviewer guy...

    I'd highly recommend seeing this movie to anyone who wants to see a great actor strut his stuff for a good hour. Mid-way through, though, you might want to do yourself a favor, finish your popcorn and just go home.

    i do not know anyone that would want to spend $10.00 per ticket and subject themselves to half a movie, knowing full well they have been promised a disappointing second half/ending.

    I authorize you to use the phrase: "wait for it on cable"... and enjoy Denzel's acting while you do something productive.

    I appreciate the heads up but you should express yourself when you've been robbed.

    1. Re:Jon, you kant recommend half a movie. by Claudius · · Score: 1

      With one small typo you have juxtaposed the two great thinkers of modern times: Jon Katz and Kant. (Just between you and me, I would have ordered Kant before Katz, however. The former's acumen was, albeit slightly, more powerful than that of our esteemed /. colleague).

    2. Re:Jon, you kant recommend half a movie. by Snootch · · Score: 1

      Please Jon, you are suppost to be a real grown up movie reviewer guy...

      I do not know anyone that would want to spend $10.00 per ticket and subject themselves to half a movie, knowing full well they have been promised a disappointing second half/ending.


      Now, I think it's time to introduce you to a new concept, so pay attention. It's called "satire", "wit", "wry humour", or any of its other various names. Basically, it involved obvious exaggeration to make a point. When you see exaggeration, you therefore don't comment on the lack of accuracy. You see, that's the point of this "exaggeration" thing.

      Got that? Any questions? Are you sure? It's a tough one, I know, so don't be afraid to ask...

    3. Re:Jon, you kant recommend half a movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I think it's time to introduce you to a new concept, so pay attention. It's called "satire", "wit", "wry humour", or any of its other various names. Basically, it involved obvious exaggeration to make a point. When you see exaggeration, you therefore don't comment on the lack of accuracy. You see, that's the point of this "exaggeration"

      You cranky little halfwit. Have you ever read of Mr. Katz's reviews in the past? I have, he doesn't usually speak in that tone. you see professional writers do have a voice, I am not a writer but I have probably been reading longer then you have been breathing.Take your tone for example. You are a cranky little ass that mistakes cynicism and sarcasm for with and intellect. Actually you just sound like a cock. Congratulations Mr. Cock.

      Got that?

      Yes you have made abundantly clea r you are an annoying little git.

      Any questions?

      One.

      Do you have any friends that like you and not just tolerate you?

      Are you sure?

      Quite positive actually.

      It's a tough one, I know, so don't be afraid to ask.

      Jesus you are a pathetic fuck. The only thing I feel you are qualified to answer is this: which is your favorite Pokemon?

      To surmise: I get it, you don't. I like Jon Katz, you are an angry cunt.

      Have a lovely day.

      Thanks for helping us drop bombs on people (I infer you are English from the spelling of humour, if you are not, then you are a different kind of cunt. But certainly a cunt all the same.)

    4. Re:Jon, you kant recommend half a movie. by sulli · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of The Phantom Edit?

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  13. An extension of Training Day movie reviews. by Discoteck · · Score: 3, Informative
    Movie Reviews

    Training Day

    Here is a link to Amazon's review of the movie. Here is a link to Yahoo's review of the movie. [User Rating: (4.1/5) ]

    Chicago Tribune said this about Training Day.

    "Training Day," for most of its length, is genuinely thrilling, explosively cynical about life on the streets and in the squad cars. More strikingly, it lets Washington play a really juicy heavy: hard driving, acid-tongued Detective Sgt. Alonzo Harris. Harris is Washington's meanest, most brutal and dangerous character in years -- an L.A. cop who's adjusted so completely to life among the wolves that he's become a wolf himself. Washington is magnificently vicious and wily in the role."

    "Dares to be a cop movie based on character and not on pyrotechnics."
    -- Jeffrey M. Anderson, SAN FRANCISCO EXAMINER

    "The film works a bit better as a vehicle for Washington, and it often gets by on his devilish charm. But it loses all its punch as he becomes more hissable."
    -- William Arnold, SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

    "A taut -- if violent -- police thriller."
    -- Ken Fox, TV GUIDE'S MOVIE GUIDE

    "Washington's performance is so good, in fact, that it may temporarily blind you from seeing that the movie has obscured its message."
    -- Sean Means, SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

    All Posters.com as a poster of the show if you are looking for one.

    Here is the director Antoine Fuqua's filmography. I was interested to see if he was an action director that is continuing his specialization or if he directed mainly heart felt drama's and was crossing genre's. With a limited filmography that includes previous B+ rated action flicks as The Replacement Killers, it seems that he has the background to provide us with an entertaining medium grade action flick. I would definately see this movie over The Musketeer.

    --
    /.................../ \\ /...................../
    1. Re:An extension of Training Day movie reviews. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my super-secret rating system does....also, the first post in this thread was done by a complete karma whore.

  14. wow...that was WAY off by UM_Maverick · · Score: 3

    This isn't katz-bashing, but more a different opinion.

    With regards to the borderline-racism: These scenes are supposed to be the very gang-infested neighborhoods of LA. Everyone in those neighborhoods was packing - black, white, latino, polka-dotted, whatever. Do you really think that Denzel Washington would be a part of a movie that was borderline racist?

    Russian Mafia: This wasn't a plot "twist" at all...it was the basis of the movie. (Don't worry...i'm not going to throw out spoilers) At the beginning of the film, Denzel's character Alonzo becomes *very* endebted to the russian mafia. The movie very intelligently shows his efforts to pay them back. If you just look for the action, you'll miss the sub-plots, but this is a great movie, with some very, very well done plot twists

    Remember, IANAMC (I am not a movie critic), so your opinions may differ, but I thought the movie was good...

    1. Re:wow...that was WAY off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Russian Mafia plot device was evident from the beginning of the movie. Perhaps since Katz is stupid, he forgot about it. What a dumbass.

  15. Burnin' Karma by dasunt · · Score: 2



    50 Karma is 50 Karma, it doesn't get any better, so why not burn some of it and keep myself warm?


    Jon Katz - Now not only qualified to discuss geek angst as an expert, and not only the leading authority of zeitgeist of our times, he can also do movie reviews.


    Seriously though, if slashdot is going to do movie reviews, presumably based on the idea that "geeks like movies", how long is it until we see Katz degenerate into reviewing takeout pizza, video games, or acne cream, all things the stereotypical geek would like to know about?


    Why not stick to "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." You can't be all things to everyone. The usefulness of the majority of websites is specialization. If you try to do everything, you generally end up doing a shallow pass of all subjects, which benefits no one but the most casual of users.


    Just my $.02

    1. Re:Burnin' Karma by Snootch · · Score: 1

      Why not stick to "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." You can't be all things to everyone.

      From the lack of hundreds of posts like yours, the interesting (and interested) discussion in the forum, and the fact that this has been happening on slashdot for quite a while without severe negative feedback / user falloff, I would conclude that most people on the site regard movies as "stuff that matters". Besides, it's not as if it gives you lasting psychological distress to skip over a story when scrolling down the homepage. I appreciate that you're burning karma for the hell of it, but still, this could be mistaken for a meaningful comment, and that would be terrible...

  16. why is this even on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could you stick to more technology and computer stuff? is the turning into a forum for every bullshit topic?

  17. Does anyone edit these? by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 4, Informative
    Does anyone edit these?

    Denzel Washington (Det. Alonzo Harris) is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Jake Hoyt (Ethan Hawke)...

    Parallel construction please. To someone who's not aware that Ethan Hawke is an actor, he'd think that Ethan Hawke was the character's name.

    Shoulda been:

    Denzel Washington (Det. Alonzo Harris) is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Ethan Hawke (Jake Hoyt)...
    For that matter, character names in reviews are usually just noise and show that the reviewer lives inside his press kit. A cleaner intro would have been:
    Denzel Washington is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Ethan Hawke...
    1. Re:Does anyone edit these? by brash · · Score: 1
      Shoulda been:
      Denzel Washington (Det. Alonzo Harris) is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Ethan Hawke (Jake Hoyt)...

      No, it shouldn't have been. This reads to me like Alonzo's partner is Ethan Hawke, played by Jake Hoyt. Katz's wording is actually better. If you're gong to pick nits, it should brobably read more like this:

      • Denzel Washington is amazing as Det. Alonzo Harris, a rogue LAPS narc who is turning his new rookie partner, Jake Hoyt (played by Ethan Hawke) to the dark side.
      You can't make it much clearer than that.

    2. Re:Does anyone edit these? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 0
      Denzel Washington (Det. Alonzo Harris) is amazing as a rogue LAPD narc who's turning his new rookie partner Jake Hoyt (Ethan Hawke)...


      Parallel construction please. To someone who's not aware that Ethan Hawke is an actor, he'd think that Ethan Hawke was the character's name.


      No, the first part has the word as in it, so it's Denzel Washington as the person turning, and the turnee is the character, not the actor.

  18. hey Katz. by BenLutgens · · Score: 0

    Shut up you damned Siskel & Ebert wannabe. Noone cares what you say about movies. Your opinion sucks.

    And why the hell is this movie being reviewed on /. it has no geek-centric content or subject matter at all.

    --
    "If you love someone, set them free. If they come home, set them on fire." - George Carlin
  19. Movie Review? Again? by Red+Moose · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Is Jon Katz paid for these movie reviews? It seems like that's all he does, and he doesn't even do it very well.

    Surely he has some intelligent insights in the current technology & financial climate, forthcoming OS developments or interesting tales or stories from the net.

    Oh, except HE DOESN'T HAVE A FUCKING CLUE ABOUT ANY OF THOSE THINGS. My bad.

    --

    Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

  20. Racist? by Bryant · · Score: 1

    Katz maybe ought to spend some time in East LA before he characterizes the movie as racist.

    Actually, what I found really interesting was that in the Training Day I just saw, not all the black and Hispanic characters were "packing heat." In fact, in one particular climatic scene, there was a distinct lack of firearms.

    One aspect of racism is seeing only what you expect. (Remember geek profiling? Didn't Katz do a couple of articles about that?) Apparently, Katz expects to see guns on black people in the projects.

  21. Tweaking Movies by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What we seem to have here is the result of constantly wanting to add just one more thing to a script.

    Of course we have seen this in other areas, such as coding.

    Think of it as the movie equivalent of Feature Creep. Like all things, sometime you get away with it, and sometimes you don't. Alot depends on your taste.

    But it sounds like the original idea was in the first hour of the flick and the rest was added in the infamous studio writing process.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  22. instead of a "Katz Filter" by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we should have a "everyone ranting about how horrible he is" filter.

    I am glad that you people don't care to listen to his poor writing style and his crap reviews but I certainly would rather hear his crap than yours. Please try and refrain from it.

    As far as that comment goes, why not try and give us a decent review yourselves. That would be a billion times more beneficial than whining when you can just block his stories.

    The movie was definitly crappy. It was NOT worth the 5.25 I paid for it, and I don't recommend it to anyone.

    I went to see Ratdog last night in Toledo. That was a smokin' show. If any of you audiophiles out there have a copy of it it would be much appreciated ;)

    Bobby Weir is getting older (bald spot) but he looks like he is in decent shape for his age. The Sax player is a fucking pain in the ass that needs to understand that he is NOT the lead in the band. Sax solos might be cool for Clinton 10 years ago but they aren't cool every 20s of a song.

    I miss the Dead and Ratdog's show last night was like seeing my last shows all over again. They played a smoking Corrina, One More Saturday Night, and my personal favorite... the rocking US Blues.

    Have a good day everyone :) Lay off Katz and go see Bobby :)

    1. Re:instead of a "Katz Filter" by Kraft · · Score: 2

      we should have a "everyone ranting about how horrible he is" filter.

      I couldn't agree more. All you Katz-bashers, you DO know that if you go into your /. settings, you can exclude Katz stories, right? If you hate him that much, don't read what he writes. Simple. CmdrTaco has said he likes what Katz produces, and seeing it's Tacos site (kinda), respect that or turn off Katz. If it REALLY bothers you that Katz has anything to do with /., then write Taco about it (or even - flame Katz directly).

      Don't spam me about it in every fucking article Katz writes.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    2. Re:instead of a "Katz Filter" by Alsee · · Score: 1

      the 5.25 I paid

      Is that U.S. Dollars??

      Last time I went to the movies it was $8.50 each, and that's before hitting the snack bar.

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Is it possible to mod entire Katz threads to -1? by Red+Moose · · Score: 1

    Yes that would have made more sense, but it's Katz we're talking about here, and he just wants to appear like he can do movie "reviews" like the guys who write the stuff on the back of rental boxes.

    --

    Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

  24. Katz, you are full of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie rocked. Don't listen to this idiot, this is a kickass movie.

  25. el ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh what I wouldn't give to bury my face in Anna's sweaty ass after she's played a match.

  26. Training Day == The Corruptor? by chemguru · · Score: 1


    This movie sounds AMAZINGLY like The Corruptor with Mark Wahlberg and Chow Yun Fat except with a bit of role reversal.

    Come on, Hollywood! Let's be a little more creative, eh???

    --
    --Chemguru
    1. Re:Training Day == The Corruptor? by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      Yeah, _The Corruptor_ came to mind. But don't forget _The Bad Lieutenant_. While _The Bad Lieutenant_ didn't involve seducing a good cop into evil, there were still a lot of parallels between it and _Training Day._ Especially the ending. ("Hey, Cop!" ).

      Don't get me wrong, _Training Day_ basically sucked (in spite of good acting by both principals), and _The Bad Lieutenant_ had a much better script (although it was unbearably depressing) but I still think that _Training Day_ borrowed a lot from the _Bad Lieutenant_.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  27. Re:Training Bra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah what's the deal with Ann Frank. I had to read that bullshit in school a long time ago. I can't remember, did she get a training bra or have her period or something? I heard they cut out the really "good" parts.

    On the other hand, that Ann Frank diary has pretty much proven to be a fraud -- a complete forgery that was cooked up to rake in some sheckels.

  28. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by chico.gonzalez · · Score: 1

    what's next?
    "Waake Uup Whiite Peepul." (Stern Fans would know what i'm talking 'bout)

  29. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come it's ok for black comedians to make fun of white folks on tv but white comedians can't make fun of blacks on tv?

    I bet you can't watch an evening of sitcoms on UPN without at least a couple of whitey jokes, but i guess that's ok becuase whitey ain't funkay, whitey can't dance, and whitey be all uptight.

    The lame part is white people who think they are "enlightened" will watch these lame shows and laugh at the jokes about themselves. Like "hahah he's right, it's true, us white people are just lame, we don't know how to get down and funkay!".

  30. Hats off to you, nonsequitur troll, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for brightening my day with your hilariously off-topic discourses! Here's to many more years of dedicated service! Roffles!

  31. katz = worst movie reviewer alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    i've never seen anybody write more horrible movie reviews than katz. He gets the plot points wrong (the russian mafia part), he slags on the movie without actually explaining his reasons, and he throws spoilers in with reckless abandon.

    i think slashdot should just cut these "reviews" out once and for all.

  32. Katz clearly does not get this movie by brash · · Score: 1

    The "silly plot twist featuring a Russian mafia" WAS the point of the movie. The whole movie is about Alonzo covering his ass for something he did to a member of the Russian mafia. Katz obviously failed to grasp that. Hoyt discovers Alonzo's duplicity after Alonzo's failed attempt to set him up, and goes on a rampage to bring him to justice.

    This film also highlights how easy it is for a one-time good cop (Alonzo) to get sucked into the corruption and greed that breeds drug dealers, when you're exposed to them on a daily basis (much like many other cop corruption flicks, so nothing new there).

    This movie was excellent. The premise of the film isn't exactly ground-breaking territory, but it was treated well. There were only a few small logical inconsistencies near the end of the film, which I think can easily be overlooked in the shadow of an overall great effort by a great cast in a well-written flick.

    John Katz should find something better to do with his spare time...

  33. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done something similar and although I can't join in on the conversations around the water cooler, I feel I'm a better person because of it. I don't want my children growing up around music and movies that glorifykilling Whites, raping, stealing, doing drugs, drinking excessive amounts of alcohol, etc.

  34. OFF TOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    OFF TOPIC

    Okay, if it isn't OFF TOPIC, then can I write a review of a movie I don't like?

  35. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. That remark about the water cooler is so true -- I don't know what the heck they are chattering about, and I really don't want to know. I'm thankful that destructive, hateful, anti-White programming is not one of my social reference points.

  36. My favouritest part ever! by Ace905 · · Score: 1, Troll

    My favouritest part in the movie was that scene where Denzel Washington is in the really really bad ghetto house with the drug people, and he's all sweating, and has his pants around his ankles staring dead in the eyes of Sandra Bullock. She tries to tell him that his whole history is being erased by an evil multi-national corporation known only as "Pi". And then after like 10 or 15 minutes of her telling this story, while Washington just kinda nods his head once in a while and goes, "uh huh... oh yeah.... oh yeah... ya, I heard a that somewhere I think.... oh? oh really?"... and then she mentions they may even go after his "mama" and he gets up, penis flaying wildly and shouts, "I'm the Poe Leece! KING KONG ain't got NUTHHIIIN ONNN ME!", and Sandra's all weirded out for a while so she tells him, "I said they're going after your family", and he's like, "Ohhhhhhh........ I thought you said something else"....

    That was funny, it really added realism to the scene.

    Eggplants!

    --

    Ace
    1. Re:My favouritest part ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what about the part when Ethan Hawke picked up a flame thrower and set Sandra Bullock on fire and said "I'd like to propose a toast!" That was funny, cuz you know, he was toasting her.

    2. Re:My favouritest part ever! by Ace905 · · Score: 1

      I really think it's unfair that because my tagline has been used by trolls, my legitimate posts are being marked trolls also.

      I posted a funny comment here, and it was completely relevant to the topic. Eggplants!

      --

      Ace
  37. Thanks to all the would be critics. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    John Kats and his bashers, admirers, and those who could care less. Why? Because it makes a *well rounded review*.

    You see I've seen reviews/previews/trailers that hype a movie to death. Some live up, some don't.

    So, what I rely on is many different opinions and this movie is no different.

    Take Reindeer Games, for instance...from the reviews and trailers, well, it looked stupid as hell, but, I saw it on a recommendation from a few people at work...that was a *good* movie.

    The Matrix, The usual suspects, long kiss goodnite and the 6th day were all along the same vein and IMO/IMR(eviews) are good flics.

    Training day may be more like the Long Kiss Goodnite in that it is an excellent flic, with damn good acting but LKG got a little "soft" (for lack of a better word/thesaurs) for the last 15mins tword the end.
    Did that ruin the movie? Nope. Forgivable? Yep.

    I dunno, maybe critics are too critical. Heck, when I took my son to see shrek, I damn near busted a gut laughing...and I was the only one in the theatre that said "YEAH" real loud when the lady dragon ate the king...heh, I guess I'm a big kid :)

    Thanks for reading.

    Moose.

    Be good, or don't get caught being otherwise.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Thanks to all the would be critics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6th Day was a good movie? Jesus ass tits christ whats wrong with you?

    2. Re:Thanks to all the would be critics. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      6th Day was a good movie? Jesus ass tits christ whats wrong with you?

      Ok, ok, I'm biased...I admit it, but as far as most of "Aaa-nolds" movies the 6th day was a good flic. Maybe not "terminator" calibre, but close enuf for me.

      Moose.

      Yeah, I responded to an AC...discussion is probably dead, so who cares.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  38. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure, but I think it has something to do with the Simpsons. Ever since the Simpsons first aired, these whitey and cracker jokes have been popping up.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  39. The ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jake is the cop that saved slim's cousin from being raped so he isn't killed, then Jake goes to Alonzo's house and they get into a shootout. They both are really hurt and then jake has alonzo at gun point. Alonzo tells the group that has formed around them to shoot jake and they'll get paid, but one just puts the gun on the ground and tells Alonzo to do it. Alonzo bends over to pick it up and jake shoots him in the ass. Alonzo is later driving along and stops at a stoplight. He tries to run the light but is stopped by 2 vans. The russians come out and shoot him to hell. Jake goes home to his wife.

  40. Why isn't anyone mentioning.. by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

    ..From Dusk till Dawn, which must be the ultimate example of this kind of directorial mistake. Granted, Tarantino did it with style, but I was still left feeling cheated and violated when the "splatter" part began.

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    1. Re:Why isn't anyone mentioning.. by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Tarantino didn't direct that movie, dude. It was the same guy who later did "Spy Kids". No really. I'm not kidding. No really.

      From Dusk till Dawn ... Spy Kids.
      Vampire sluts ... thumb-thumbs.

      Same guy.

      Really.

    2. Re:Why isn't anyone mentioning.. by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

      Well, I thought Tarantino at least wrote the story, but now when I check I see another guy credited alongside him. Maybe that explains it - Tarantino wrote the first half, the other guy the second?

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  41. Two words.. by Microsift · · Score: 1
    Damn Right!

    Normally I'd say that you shouldn't turn off a group of articles based on the author. Since everytime Jon Katz posts something he invariably gets torn to shreds by slashdot readers, it is obviuous that some very vocal people hate everything he writes. If you fall into that category, and can't stand Jon Katz's writing, and you're not some kind of masochist, turn off JonKatz articles. If you don't have an account, get one, or...don't click on the link to his story!!

    How hard is that!

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Two words.. by LinuxIsForAssholes · · Score: 0

      So you are asking us to give up our right to freely express our opinions about that prick Katz's crappy articles. Maybe we wouldn't complain about him so much were he not so full of crap.

      As far as posting AC, I don't believe in doing that either, but I don't think that bad karma reflects stupidity, I think it reflects that I am capable of forming my own opinion and not being a karma whore like you. Slashdot is like the Borg, they have you in thier collective and if you start to have an original idea then they feel you must be destroyed and that is the way that these Borg-like moderators are treating karma points.

  42. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you talking about? How CLOSED-MINDED can you sons of bitches be? This is why we see so much violence, because of conservative dicks that want to be one with the clan!

  43. Re:Training Bra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to get ahold of little Ann Frank and have her jack me off.

  44. violent mess by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    "degenerating into a dumb, improbable, almost cartoonishly violent mess".
    Cool, I guess the movie is not all bad.

  45. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by dcheest · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else have a problem with the casting in this movie? The white cop comes in and saves the day, immune to the evil that had befallen the black cop. And, in the end, a truckload of white people gun down the black cop. It would have much less problematic if both cops were the same race.

    I watched this movie in a largely African-American and Mexican-American community and the tension was very high. At one point, someone yelled out, "Fuck this movie!" and left the theater.

    Thoughts?

  46. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because we use humor to deal with complicated issues that are still changing (hopefully for the better) in society. hopefully black people can use comedy to let out all of the justified (imo) animosity they have towards typical stupid white people (like most people postting here including you). it doesn't mean you aren't proud to be white, it means you can laugh at how corny white people can be (just like i'm sure you joke about how stupid rappers/basketball players/etc can be with your retarded boringass dork friends). SO THERE FUCKWAD.

  47. Cabbage Town in Atlanta by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    Mr. Katz, have you ever been to the ghetto? I have! Cabbage Town in Atlanta, is pretty frigen dangerous, they don't like white people and every male and some females, under 40 are packing and shooting, and dealing. Here in Douglasville (Atlanta suburb) the nearest ghetto is not quite that bad, but let's just say our Papa John's doesn't do deliveries there. Just because something is a stereo type, doesn't mean it isn't true, no matter what you'd like to think.

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:Cabbage Town in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you carry a gun because other people are carrying guns. it is that fucking simple. doesn't have to do with race at all. you start noticing everyone on your street packing, wtf you think a person will do?

    2. Re:Cabbage Town in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. Jon Katz knows shit all about movies he reviews. I saw this movie and I thought it was pretty good. What fucking standard is Katz trying to hold stuff up to?

    3. Re:Cabbage Town in Atlanta by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      i'm in agreement! shoot i'd feel safer if EVERYONE carried one! I'm just being critical of katz idiotic comment!

      --
      Derek Greene
  48. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm sure the people performing the music wish they didn't have to grow up around it either, but because they were born poor (maybe non-white, but it doesn't take skin color to be poor), they really didn't have a chance. you should instead hope your children listen to this and really know what goes on outside suburbanville, usa.

  49. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess you don't even really listen to the music, which isn't really suprising.

  50. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, of course nothing that isn't pro white would be part of your daily routine. not that you would go out of your way to HATE black people, but you sure as hell wouldn't lift a finger (or raise a voice) to help the situation. I guess you are really just a social retard who just can't conversate with other people so you just try to find ways to alienate yourself from them.

    [www.goatse.cx] is my social reference point

  51. movie reviews on slashdot by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 1

    only make sense to me when the movie has a technological aspect. One of this movies most admirable qualities is that it does not.

  52. LA gangs, Suge Knight, LAPD scandal,Rafeal Perez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is basically what the movie IMHO is about. If you look at all the facts of Rafeal Perez, Suge Knight, LA DA's office, Rampart, etc.

    Theres's also a guy named David Mack a Compton Blood who just happened to be a LAPD member, and friend of Suge Knight. Well ol' Mr.Mack must have owed someone alot of money so he decided to rob a B of A for 700K well he got caught, got 15 years, and disowned the LAPD and know considers himself a Blood member in prison.

    Now Rafeal Perez is also a main figure in all this he was setting up the Latino gangsters and killing them. He was also stealing their drugs and selling them himself. He was known to have mistresses in gang neighborhoods also. He was caught stealing cocaine from an evidence room to sell, probably to pay off someone big. Funny thing is he's out of jail but not a word has been heard from him , he's probably dead.

    Suge Knight has been linked to all this by his Blood ties to Mack and Perez. Mack and Perez were good friends and there's a link to another LA cop Kevin Gaines who was gunned down during a traffic altercation by another LAPD narcotics officer Frank Lyga in plain clothes, off duty. Suge Knight was also untouchable during the early 90's but when the scandal broke he took one of the falls, not much is heard from him nowadays either.

    "Have Gun Will Travel" is a book containg alot of info about Suge Knight and his dirty dealings.

    Alonzo also had a tattoo in the movie which is the same thing most of these LAPD rogue cops had.

    Well I have no doubt in my mind "Training Day" was about the LAPD scandal.

    Any search for LAPD scandal on Google will bring up alot of this info.
    Here's a good one: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/lapd /connect/

    Anonymous Coward for now.

  53. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone make fun of how silly gangsta rappaz, fly pimpz and other african american role models are on prime time television though?

    i didn't think so.

    of course i make from of how dumb black people are, but no one can do it on tv, only black people are allowed to be racist on tv.

  54. Ahem.. LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes place in Los Angeles, and the World Trade Center is (was?) in New York.

  55. $7.00??? You're lucky! by kebr · · Score: 1

    Where I live the movies are $15.00 just to stand in the back. Plus they kick you out after the first hour.

  56. realism ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The "ghetto" scenes are garish, crude, nearly racist stereotypes of life in the big city. Every black or Hispanic kid under 40 is packing and shooting."

    So you mean it's realistic, then ?

    Dionisus

  57. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watch most movies in a largely white community and we often feel like that on 90% of hollywood movies were the evil guy is allways the high-income white guy and the poor black guy is allways the inocent victim.
    Though we hardly ever express it in such a creative, literary way as "fuck this movie".

    Deal with it, you racist idiot.
    Oh, I'm sorry, I meant to say "affirmative actor"...

  58. Re:Is anyone else sick of seeing racial stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a natural idiot or did you have to practice ?

    >White collar crime may cost the US more ...

    Not in lives. Not in the lives I care for anyway.

    >You made your bed, now lie in it.

    Good advice for all the criminal niggers in prison.

    >HIT THEM ALL WITH THE FUCK PUCK!

    How poetic, now when do you turn 15 ?

  59. Re:I NEVER go to a Nigger movie by civicminded · · Score: 1

    what really made this movie for me was the peanut butter story. It reminded me of good old college days when I used to freak the girls out.