Slashdot Mirror


VIA to Create Pentium 4 'Clone'

PyroMosh writes: "ZDNet is carrying a brief article about VIA's plans to start producing clones of the Pentium 4. VIA's already in legal trouble with Intel and it seems unlikley that this will go unchallenged by the chipmaking juggernaut. The Register is also covering this, and SiliconStrategies.com has an article with a bit more detail."

112 comments

  1. French Toast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    The AC Avenger Strikes again!!!!

    Cyborg_Mo cannot hope to compete.

  2. Lawsuits by cadfael · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems that in this case, a lawsuit makes sense. If I made something, had a competitor copy it (and not have my okay), you bet I'd sue.

    --
    -- The Hollow Man
    Non illegitimati carborundum
    1. Re:Lawsuits by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It depends on how they are defining clone. If it just runs the same code, thats one thing, if they reproduce proprietary chip disign techniques, thats another.
      some would consider AMD a clone as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they should never have allowed other companies than Ford to make "cars". Or other companies than Boeing to make "passenger airliners". Or other companies than IBM to make "desktop PCs".

      Its not illegal just to copy something, you dickwad. Breaching copyrights and infringing patents, yes. But the concept of copying something is not illegal by itself.

    3. Re:Lawsuits by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 2

      Many people these days don't seem to remember that far back (maybe I'm getting old), but for a long time, AMD (and in those days Cyrix was the other big one) *were* virtually exact clones (of 386/486 etc).

      Its only *relatively* recently (three or four years ago?) that AMD decided to "fork" the design and start adding features of their own.

    4. Re:Lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...that's because AMD (and IBM and several other companies) had licences with Intel to manufacture x86 processors. AMD had a big lawsuit that they won around the time of the Pentium, where they got to keep getting some information from Intel for awhile. It let AMD keep selling their 486-100's, and helped them with the K5/K6. IIRC, the Athlon was their first "clean" chip design.

  3. Maybe it will produce CPU errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as well as the 686 southbridge produces write errors.

  4. A P4 clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully Intel can stop them before they do something this monstrously dumb. There's a lot of other avenues for chip improvement that can implement the P4 instruction set but don't require the clunky architecture.

  5. first particularly pointless post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    it sure is. it's pointless, and it's long enough to get past the even-more-pointless lameness filter.

  6. you're gay by Proctal+Relapse · · Score: -1

    Ever since he had seen his ex-wife that terrible last time, his performance
    in bed had been less than spectacular. In fact, he often couldn't get hard
    enough to embed his most important organ in even the most receptive of
    cunts. His doctor had told him that his problem was psychological, and that
    if he could ever completely put his ex-wife out of his mind, the problem
    would most likely disappear.

    He did have reason to hope that this would be one of his better nights. The
    new girl that he had picked up at the clubhouse was very young and very
    beautiful. He had taken her to a party, where they had fun dancing and
    flirting with each other. Best of all, she seemed to be really horny
    tonight, and she was doing her best to turn him on.

    After the party, they had gone to her apartment for drinks. They were
    sitting close together in the middle of her large couch. She suddenly put
    her drink down and stood up, stretching her arms up high over her head and
    thrusting her chest out. ! She was wearing a very short, body-hugging red
    sheath dress. As she stood there with her arms stretched over her head, the
    hem of her dress was pulled high up her thighs, so high that her panties
    were nearly exposed to view. Her breasts were pushing out so hard that her
    erect nipples were clearly visible, even through the lacy black bra that
    she was wearing. Her long, shapely legs were covered, but not concealed, by
    sheer black stokings.

    "Ahhhh!" she sighed. "That's nice. I really had fun at the party. But it's
    good to be home, where we can really relax and enjoy each other's company."
    She held her pose for several seconds, then reached down and picked up a
    remote. "I think I'll put on some soft dance music. Okay ?"

    His face revealed his displeasure at her suggestion. With sudden unexpected
    anger in his voice, he replied "What's the point? We already did that! I'm
    not about to dance any more!"

    "Oh! I'm sorry," she said. "I wasn't suggesting that you should dance any
    more with me. You just sit there and relax. And make yourself comfortable.
    I know you like your imported shoes, I like them too, but wouldn't you be
    more comfortable if you slipped them off? (She had removed her own shoes as
    soon as they had entered her apartment.) And you could slip off your coat
    and tie. In fact . . . (the hint of a mischievous smile appeared at the
    corners of her beautiful lips) there's no need to keep wearing ANYthing . .
    ! . really." She blushed briefly at the sheer naughtiness of her
    suggestion. She was not usually as forward as this, but tonight she was
    feeling especially sexually adventurous.

    Her explanation seemed to calm him down, so she pushed a couple of buttons
    on the remote and her CD player started softly playing some slow, sensual
    dance music. She walked to the front of the CD player and leaned against
    it. Then she closed her eyes, put her head back, and pulled a pin from her
    hair. Her golden tresses tumbled past her shoulders to the middle of her
    back. After a moment she sat down, facing him, on a large chair that was
    beside the CD player. She pulled her knees up and rocked back in the chair,
    thrusting her crotch out, and placed her heels on the front edge of the
    chair cushion. He gasped as her movements pulled her dress up and exposed
    her crotch to him. She was wearing black silk bikini panties and a matching
    garter belt that was holding up her stockings. She smiled at him as he
    openly stared up her dress. He licked his lips and imagined the sweetness
    that was now concealed by so very little. She unfastened the clips holding
    the tops of her stockings and ! slowly, slo-o-w-w-w-l-y, rolled the
    stockings down her legs. She caressed her naked flesh with her hands as her
    thighs and calves were uncovered. When both her legs were bare, she dropped
    the stockings on the floor and stood up.

    She was feeling the low, throbbing music deeply now, and she started to
    sway gracefully back and forth to the beat. She danced slowly toward him
    until she was dancing back and forth right in front of the couch. She
    danced sensually for several minutes, her movements becoming more and more
    exaggerated. Her dress clung tantalizingly to her body, showing off her
    perfect curves, and she moved her hands up and down, caressing herself
    through her red dress. She moved her hands to her breasts and squeezed
    them, then moaned from the pleasure that it gave her.

    Her dance was having the intended effect on them both. Whenever she brushed
    a hand over one of her erect nipples, it felt like little electric sparks
    shot through the whole breast. Her cunt was making so much juice the crotch
    of her panties was barely able to hold it all. And her dance had his cock
    as hard as it had ever recently been. He was almost panting as he watched
    her dance and caress herself. He especially watched the hem of her dress as
    her movements pulled it higher and higher up her legs. He wanted to catch
    the exact moment that her panties would be revealed to his stare again.
    Suddenly, she stopped dancing. She leaned slightly forward, toward him,
    pulled her dress up in the back, and reached under it. She quickly slid her
    panties down her legs and pulled them off.

    "Oh, my goddd!" he groaned when her panties hit the floor and he detected
    the faint, sweet odor of her excitement. He started to unbutton his shirt,
    but she put her hand over his and shook her head *no*! , so he stopped.
    They were both nearly panting as she resumed her dancing and he resumed his
    staring. The music was getting faster now, and so was her dancing.
    Gradually, keeping with the music, her movements became frantic. Her long,
    blonde hair was flying and her dress was pulled high. He could see the
    gentle curves where her legs met her ass cheeks, and the blonde curls that
    framed her cunt. "OH, MYYY GODDDD!" he groaned again, louder.

    The music suddenly reached an intense climax and then stopped completely.
    She dropped to one knee when the music stopped, and bowed her head
    slightly. She was panting for breath now, trying to recover from her
    exertion. After a few moments of rest, she stood up and looked at him with
    lust-filled eyes. She slipped the thin straps of her dress off her
    shoulders. It was too tight to fall on its own, but with a couple of gentle
    tugs on each side, it slipped down her body and fell to the floor. He
    gasped and swallowed hard as her incredible body was fully revealed to him.
    She was now wearing only a thin, lacy black bra and her black silk garter
    belt. Her full breasts and beckoning nipples seemed to be begging for his
    hands and mouth to engulf them. Farther down, her slender waist and firm
    belly gave way to beautifully rounded hips, and to a high, firm ass. For a
    moment, he truly realized how very lucky he was, that she had chosen to
    take him to her apartment for sex.

    She took his! hands in hers and indicated that he should stand. She slowly
    unbuttoned his shirt and pulled it wide open. Since in his youth he had
    been a professional athlete, she was a little surprised to see that, like
    so many men his age, he had "love handles" and a middle age paunch. But it
    didn't bother her. In fact, she might have been a little relieved that he
    wasn't the "male god" that he had sometimes been made out to be. She
    pressed her hot, wet tongue against his chest. She licked slowly down to
    his navel, and then back up to the base of his neck. He moaned when she
    sucked one of his dark nipples into her mouth. Then she peeled the shirt
    from his shoulders and dropped it to the floor. Meeting his lust-filled
    gaze with her own, she unfastened his belt and let his pants drop. He
    trembled and moaned softly when she pressed her hand over his dick and
    balls.

    She slipped her fingers into the waistband of his briefs and slowly pulled
    them off. For a few moments, with him wearing only his socks and with her
    wearing only her bra and garter belt, they simply looked at each other. An
    observer would have been struck by the contrasts between them. She, with
    her pale skin and youthful beauty, her cunt pouring out sweet honey in
    anticipation of passionate, exuberant sex. He, with his dark skin and
    middle age sags, his cock seemingly little more than half hard, just hoping
    that he would be able to take advantage of this young woman's willingness
    to let him fuck her.

    "Let's go to bed," he whispered hopefully.

    "No, honey," she replied as she removed her bra and garter. "Let's just use
    the couch instead."

    He shuddered as a haunting memory of his ex-wife suddenly filled his mind.
    She smiled, thinking that his shudder was just a sign of his passion. She
    lay down onto the couch on her back, then she took his hands and pulled him
    over her. She put her hand on the back of his neck and pulled his face
    down to her left tit.

    He started to lick her left nipple. She was a little surprised, and more
    than a little disappointed, by the way he was doing it. All of the men that
    she had fucked before had devoured both of her succulent titties with
    considerable enthusiasm. They had licked, and slurped, and sucked, until it
    had them both writhing against each other in pleasure. But he wasn't doing
    it that way. He didn't seem to be enthusiastic about it at all. He licked
    and sucked a little, but his actions seemed to be purely mechanical, almost
    cold. It was in sharp contrast to his seeming excitement while he watched
    her dance. She started to rapidly lose her own sexual heat, and to think
    that maybe it had just been a mistake to bring him to her apartment. She
    decided that maybe it would just be best to let him finish as soon as
    possible and write it off as one of those disappointing nights.

    She reached down between their bodies and grasped his sort-of-stiff dick.
    "Too bad," she thought sadly. "Even his cock doesn't match the myth. He's
    even smaller than most of the white cocks I've seen." She guided the head
    of his cock to her rapidly drying pussy. He pressed his hips forward and
    his dick slid almost unnoticed into her. She barely felt it. His eyes were
    closed and there were beads of sweat on his forehead. He didn't seem to
    notice at all that she had lost her enthusiasm for this. He began to pump
    his hips back and forth, and for a few moments his cock slid in and out, in
    and out. Soon, he clenched his teeth and cam. Well, sort of cam. He didn't
    really shoot anything. It just sort of leaked out.

    After he was finished, he lowered the full weight of his body onto her.
    Still keeping his eyes tightly closed, he whispered "Oh, Nicole . . .
    Nicole. I knew that finally you'd fuck me again."

    She kissed his cheek and hugged him gently, then whispered back "Sorry,
    honey! I'm not Nicole. But I hope I'll do."

    He jerked upright, sitting across her waist. He was suddenly filled with
    anger. "Smart assed slut!" he screamed. "Damn right you're not Nicole!"
    Then he slapped her hard. He started to beat her savagely, alternately
    slapping and punching. She was totally unprepared for his sudden, merciless
    attack. At first, she couldn't even try to defend herself. But after the
    first few blows had already landed, she raised her arms and tried to shield
    her face from his blows. It did no good. He simply punched through her
    defenses, or punched lower, landing a very hard blow to her throat. He even
    punched hard onto her left breast. Her whole face was red and swelling
    rapidly. Her left eye was blood red, and the skin around it was turning a
    deep purple. Then he slapped her left cheek again, and his ring cut a deep
    gash into her flesh. Her blood spurted out across her chest and onto the
    couch.

    He stopped beating her for a moment when he saw her blood. But he was still
    sitting on top of her and glaring down angrily at her. She was stunned by
    his sudden, violent attack. Too stunned to even cry. In a dry, emotionless
    whisper, she said "Oh, my god . . . you really did it . . . Her poor
    children." That set him off again. He slapped her and punched her
    repeatedly. "Why . . . why?" she groaned between his blows.

    He didn't offer an answer. Maybe he didn't really know why himself. His
    first slap was almost just a savage reflex to his anger when she innocently
    admitted that she was not his ex-wife. But he was beating her now just
    because he liked doing it. He enjoyed the feel of his fist smashing hard
    against the soft skin on a woman's face. He enjoyed hearing the *smack* and
    the *crunch* as his blows landed. Most of all, he enjoyed hearing the
    painful groans of the women he beat. And, whenever he beat any woman, he
    always hoped that there would be blood.

    Her upper lip wa! s suddenly split wide open and her blood spurted out
    again. The sight of more of her blood made him stop beating her again. She
    was quietly sobbing now and pleading with him not to kill her too.

    He finally spoke. "Listen, bitch," he said in a low, menacing voice. "You
    chose to bring me here and fuck me. I didn't make you do that, you did it
    on your own. But now that you've done it, I fucking OWN you." He actually
    snarled to emphasize his point. He continued in an emotionless, but
    absolutely commanding tone of voice. "You will always make yourself
    available to me. You will keep yourself fit and attractive for me. You will
    wear clothes, and use makeup, only as I tell you to." She couldn't believe
    what he was saying. But she didn't dare to object to anything he said. "You
    will fuck me whenever, and wherever, I say. The only other men that you
    will fuck are the ones that I tell you to fuck." He paused for a moment,
    and then said "I'll explain the rest of it to you later. You know, of
    course, that you won't be able to get any help from the L.A.P.D. They
    learned enough from the first time to just leave me alone now."

    He stood and looked down at her. "I'm going to clean up and go out for a
    while. After I've gone, you clean yourself up and get yourself ready for my
    return. And get rid of this fucking couch before I come back." He started
    to walk away, but then turned back for a moment. Blood still flowed from
    both her cheek and her lip, and both her eyes were swollen nearly shut.
    "Think you're bleeding now, bitch?" he asked cruelly. "I could tell you
    about some real bleeding . . . " Then he turned away and went into her
    bathroom.

    As she heard him washing and dressing himself, she sobbed bitterly. She
    thought "What have I done to deserve this? How the fuck did I get myself
    into this mess, anyway? What about some justice for me . . . and for poor
    Nicole?" Even though clotting had started to slow the flow of blood, it
    still oozed from the wounds on her cheek and lip. Her swollen face hurt
    like hell, and she could barely see. How the shit was she supposed to get
    ready for more of this? Then she heard the door close as he left. And she
    was glad.

    1. Re:you're gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Go O.J., slash through that defensive line!

      I love OJ, even if he is really Bin Laden.

    2. Re:you're gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Come Mr Taleban turn over Bin Laden ...

      http://www.madblast.com/oska/humor_bin.swf

      Cruise Missile knocking at your door ...

  7. Wait a second by bool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't AMD do something similiar in reverse engineering Intel's chips? Anyone know what legal action came of that?

    --

    ----------
    while (alive) { Work(); PayTaxes(); Eat(); Sleep(); }
    Bool
    1. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Wait a second by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      VIA has been making x86 chips for a while... I would expect them to have a license of this sort as well... so what is the trouble then?

    3. Re:Wait a second by StormySky · · Score: 1

      Interesting article. I've been a fan of AMD
      chips for years, because they tend to be
      cheaper than Intel's offerings, as well
      as outperform them. However, I'm curious
      as to what exactly AMD is paying for the right
      to use. Surely not 'mov', 'jmp', 'cmp', etc.
      I wonder where our new crop of emulators would
      fall if one can charge for use of their chipset
      instructions...

      --
      We can face anything... except for bunnies.
    4. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a fan of AMD chips for years,

      Perhaps you should take a look at this video from Tom's hardware.

      Recent AMD chips are a fire hazard.

    5. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you people get paid to refer people to that video!?

    6. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't 'mov', 'jmp', and 'cmp' that they are licensing. It's the entire instruction set (minus Intel additions like MMX, etc.) and the underlying binary code that each instruction translates to.

    7. Re:Wait a second by Magnusite · · Score: 1

      A post-test loop? You mean you don't check if you're alive before you go to work? Look Out, It's Zombie Bool!!

      ...only kidding

    8. Re:Wait a second by aanantha · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't trying to support the x86 instruction set or MMX, SSE, or SSE2. It's that VIA wants to use the same bus protocol as the Pentium 4, so that their chip is a drop-in replacement. Since the Pentium 2, everyone has been barred from doing that. Intel's bus protocol for their Pentium 2 through 4 line is patented. Chipset vendors like VIA were able to get licenses to implement support for the Pentium 2 and Pentium 3's bus (GTL), but not for making processors for it. That's why AMD couldn't make processors that work on Intel chipsets and motherboards after the Pentium. Intel is also sueing VIA for making a chipset supporting the Pentium 4.

  8. hehehe by TheMMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    "already in legal trouble with intel"
    This is like calling a kickboxer a bad name and when he says "WHAT did you say" repeat it...

    --
    Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
    1. Re:hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly like that

  9. We all know about the Cyrix... by BSDGeek · · Score: 1

    We all know that the Cyrix... well, sucks. It sounds like a bad move for VIA anyway. Why not mimic one of the AMD chips? If they are going to get into legal trouble, why not mimic something higher end.

    1. Re:We all know about the Cyrix... by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      VIA bought the Cyrix name and it's hardly fair to characterize any product under that name as being inferior.

      VIA probably chose to clone the Intel chips because they feel that they have a license to do so (it being the same license that they feel gives them the right to create the Intel P4 chipsets).

      Why not go higher performance, like AMD? In addition to the Intel license issue, the fact is that a 1.5ghz AMD is viewed by the public as being less powerful than a 2.0ghz Intel part. People are stupid, they don't read benchmarks, and it's not likely to change.

    2. Re:We all know about the Cyrix... by BSDGeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, VIA did buy the Cyrix name... But even though they have improved it w/ low power consumption and general coolness, read those benchmarks. However, I believe you are right about the public's view of AMD's chips.

    3. Re:We all know about the Cyrix... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      But even though they have improved it w/ low power consumption and general coolness, read those benchmarks.

      But I, and many others, don't care. I want a laptop that runs for four hours or more per charge, doesn't give me second degree burns on my privates when I actually use it on my lap, and performs adequately for word processing, web browsing, etc. I don't need it to play Quake at 120fps. I have a machine at home for that.

      Fot that reason, I think that VIA is hitting the nail on the head. People just don't need ghz-class machines to run Word, read mail, and surf the web.

  10. VIA denies this. by marcop · · Score: 5, Informative

    3Dnow.net links to the article at: http://www.theinquirer.net/19100103.htm that states that VIA denies this. Gotta love the opening paragraph.

    1. Re:VIA denies this. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I was just going to post that Now can we stop /. 'ing the reg? I haven't been able to read it all day! :-)

    2. Re:VIA denies this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great opening paragraph!

      Nice to see some people with a sense of humor.

    3. Re:VIA denies this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man that site really looks like a horrible REGISTER rip-off!

    4. Re:VIA denies this. by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      Can someone please mod the parent to "Funny" instead of "Informative" as some of the replies to this obviously don't understand that The Inquirer is a humour/parody site.

  11. I would definitely sue by shd99004 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If my company have been spending millions of bucks and as many working hours to develop and manufacture such a thing as the P4, and someone just took it and copied it without my consent, ofcourse I would sue. Don't tell me there is anyone in here that wouldn't!

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
  12. 2Ghz chips... by LightningTH · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Why does the world need a 2-GHz system?" quizzed Glenn Henry, president of Via's Centaur Technology Inc. subsidiary in Austin, Tex.

    Quoted from the story, apparently VIA doesn't realize that games are the only real application pushing chips into new speeds. People wants games faster and people want games that are more realistic, by upping the CPU and GPU speeds, we can get to some very stunning graphics.

    Might have to be careful, may result in actually creating the Matrix...Or would we be creating a Matrix inside a Matrix?

    1. Re:2Ghz chips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is such B.S. You can have a "fast" system in terms of MIPS without a high clock rate. Its called super-scalar pipelined cores :-)

      A 486 at 150Mhz is probably slower in terms of MIPS then a 100Mhz 586 for this exact reason.

      Similarly a 1.2Ghz Athlon and 1.4Ghz P4 compare somewhat. 200Mhz is a huge difference in clock rate!

    2. Re:2Ghz chips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Might have to be careful, may result in actually creating the Matrix...Or would we be creating a Matrix inside a Matrix?

      No, then we'd be creating The Thirteenth Floor!

      http://us.imdb.com/Title?0139809

    3. Re:2Ghz chips... by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 2

      games are the only real application pushing chips into new speeds

      This statement is inaccurate. It needs an extra word: "games are the only real application pushing mainstream chips into new speeds".

      There are plenty of high-end applications (e.g. scientific visualisation, special effects, simulation, high-end servers etc, weather prediction/modelling etc) that have been pushing chips (and computers in general) to high speeds over the last 20 odd years, but not in a way that has been affordable to the consumer. The manufacturers of those systems make lots of money by selling those systems at extremely high prices. Games push companies to try make that level of functionality affordable to the man on the street, but games have never resulted in the actual creation of any of those technologies (the closest thing to innovation I can think of is programmable shaders on the GPU, but even that concept is very old, the only new thing is that its fast and its on the GPU; even the GPU concept was nothing new, it was only new to *mainstream* folk).

      Side note, what is it with this slashdot "invalid form key" crap?

  13. VIA must be on crack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    1.- This will be a HUGE task
    2.- Pentium4 sucks, why not clone Athlon instead?

    Sincerely, Mike Bouma

  14. This is an illogical use of resources by vortigern00 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To reverse engineer and duplicate a processor requires a superior understanding of processor design and construction.

    Once you have reverse engineered the processor, why wouldn't you then put your resources into designing a better processor based on what you've learned, rather than wasting time making a clone?

    1. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by btellier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because no one is going to buy some small-time shop's processor unless they say that it's just like the Pentium IV but without the fancy hologram.

    2. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Informative
      To reverse engineer and duplicate a processor requires a superior understanding of processor design and construction.

      Once you have reverse engineered the processor, why wouldn't you then put your resources into designing a better processor based on what you've learned, rather than wasting time making a clone?


      Actually, it turns out that reverse-engineering is better for a couple of reasons.

      • It's less work, not more.

        When designing a chip, you have to make a host of design decisions without knowing for certain how each of them will affect performance (you try to make an intelligent gamble on picking the right approaches). If you have an existing architecture to copy, you know more or less what the tradeoff results actually were. This saves a lot of agonizing and design time.

      • You need to follow the leader's instruction set.

        AMD is big enough *now* to add its own instruction set extensions, but this is a fairly recent development. Anyone else has to make their chip fully compatible with either Intel or AMD (Intel for safety). This counts as "cloning" as far as the average tech article writer is concerned. Whether the microarchitectural approaches are copied as well is up to the clone maker.



      I know that Via's not planning to make a P4 clone (yet). However, I believe that reverse-engineering would by far be the less costly approach for anyone attempting to clone the P4.
    3. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Funny

      To reverse engineer and duplicate a processor requires a superior understanding of processor design and construction.

      To say nothing about the fact that it requires the resources to actually develop reliable, working chips in the first place.

      I've had no end to trouble in my Abit board with Via chipset. USB, Zip, Sound, and other problems regularly blamed on the Via chips.

      I wouldn't touch a Via CPU with a 10-foot pole (or a 6-foot Czech, for that matter).

    4. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      "Once you have reverse engineered the processor, why wouldn't you then put your resources into designing a better processor based on what you've learned, rather than wasting time making a clone?"

      Because Via is a company and there is already an established market for the pentium 4. Simply making a superior chip is not a guarantee of success. There is a lot of marketing and thus resources involved in releasing a brand new chip.

      Via may in fact be working on a new chip, but one must make money in the mean time.

    5. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      > Via may in fact be working on a new chip, but one must make money in the mean time.

      This 'P4 Clone' would in fact be that new chip. But they are calling it a 'P4 Clone' to take advantage of what Intel has already done to market the P4.

      Just because they call it a 'clone' doesn't mean that it has to be reverse engineered or have very similar microarchitectural features internally.... Afterall, whatever we call these CPUs, they are simply names, and you can call any design any name you want...

    6. Re:This is an illogical use of resources by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 2

      Theres a third reason to prefer reverse engineering from creating something new: riding off the success of your predecessor. When you make something that is compatible with something that 50 million people are already using, you have an existing potential market of 50 million people who can automatically use your product. If you make something new, there is nobody using it, no existing software base that already works with it etc, so the barrier to market entry is much higher.

  15. Pity... by L-Wave · · Score: 0

    it doesnt say where to get one.....

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
  16. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of lawsuits!

  17. Is this a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Obviously, Intel wants to shove a 2-GHz system down our throats," said the outspoken Centaur executive during his presentation at the Microprocessor Forum. He said Intel believes "they will build [2-GHz processors] and the market will come."

    Shove away baby, and keep those faster processors coming.

  18. But by czardonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Chip design wants to be free!

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    1. Re:But by cadfael · · Score: 1
      Nono, that is information (with my tongue in my cheek...)

      The thing I don't get is how VIA thinks they can get away with it? By this time, we've all whined about patent law, but this is where it SHOULD be applied, right?

      In the end, it doesn't matter, as I don't imagine this will make processors cheaper faster...

      --
      -- The Hollow Man
      Non illegitimati carborundum
  19. The I Love SpamMail/I hate SpamMail Official Pol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi,
    A Poll is being taken to settle the issue whether
    commercial e-mail or SPAM is a good form of advertisement,
    which you would like more of or it's a bad form of
    advertisement which you are against.

    The arguments go more or less as follows:

    Pro:
    Commercial E-mail is a very efficient, cost effective means
    of informing people about new goods and services. This translates
    into substantial savings to the consumer. That the vast majority
    of internet users don't mind Spam and want to hear about new
    goods and services.
    That for Years now, more advanced bulk mailing software
    has allowed bulk mailers to shoulder the full cost of Spamming.
    This cost has increased and access has become much more difficult
    due to unfair and illegal practices by the big providers (the
    later day Robber Barons) Who have a vested interest in keeping
    Costs and Profits high for as long as possible, and with the news
    media with whom most have formed alliances, have and continue
    to wage a war of misinformation, deceptions, and out and out lies.
    That through an unholy alliance with vix.com, individuals
    and companies have been targeted by cyber terrorists who have
    attacked their equipment, programming and subjected people to
    threats of violence by posting personal information on these
    legitimate companies employees and individuals home addresses,
    phone numbers, which leads to threats against them, there
    families and children.
    Lastly, that the Robber Barons (Big Internet Providers) use
    special identification programs in their efforts to stop free
    trade that invades the privacy of all individuals by identifying,
    reading, and then determining whether or not you will get your
    mail or not (ask yourself this question, if AOL or SPRINT or AT&T
    or MicroSoftNetwork, (MSN), sent someone to your house to
    intercept your mail, open it, read it, and then arbitrarily
    decide whether they will put it in your mail box or not. Would
    you put up with that?) They call it filtering, we know it by
    its more insidious name, CENSORSHIP.

    Why in the world should you be subjected to this, and have to pay
    higher prices !

    Anti SPAM:

    Anti Spam arguments go something like this:
    They don't like it.
    Some genuinely want to be isolated fromthe world, others it
    seems are simply being mislead. Spammers steal services and
    don't really pay for access, Spammers are evil because the big,
    rich, powerful, largeinternet service providers say so, and it's
    OK to targetthem for all kinds of bad things, legal or not.
    They don't like it.
    And would rather have themselves and consumers everywhere
    continue to pay high inflated prices so that the Robber Barons
    may grow even richer and more powerful.
    And finally, much like the Nazi's final solution to the
    Jewish problem, they are willing to act as the RobberBaron's
    Gestapo, ready to report for termination any Spammers or Spam
    sympathizers.

    SIMPLE SOLUTION: Press the delete key, STUPID !

    Have a different opinion, give us a call because, your
    opinion on how to make this kind of advertisement better &
    to increase its use, is vital. Or if this is a terrible
    form of advertisement and how it should be curtailed,
    regulated or ended all together.

    Please call, 1-900-226-0388 and tell us.

    The charges for registering your opinion are as follows:
    Of the $1.99 per minute charge,
    1-dollar goes to the telephone service Bureau
    19 cents to retrieve your opinion
    79 cents to transcribe this information into a viable format
    Leaving a total of 2 cents.
    So do call if you wish to get your 2 cents worth in !

    Poll results will be shared with the World !

    Attention both Pro and Anti Spam Advocates and those of you who
    may have sought removal from any number of bulk mailing lists.
    If you have received this e-mail it is because it is a conscious
    decision on our part to try and include everyone in this important
    poll. To not have included those who profess a dislike for this
    form of advertisement would have eliminated those individuals
    from the process and provide an unfair advantage to one side of
    the poll. We sincerely hope that all interested individuals or
    entity's understand the necessity of inclusion.

  20. VIA is like a little doggy by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

    just running around looking for a biscuit that's not there

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  21. A little too late, maybe? by Green+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

    From your linked article:

    SOURCES CLOSE TO VIA said that an employee who seemed to hint that the firm had a Pentium 4 clone it might launch in 2004

    2004? By then Intel might be up to the Pentium 5 or 6! Why bother?

    1. Re:A little too late, maybe? by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      > By then Intel might be up to the Pentium 5 or 6! Why bother?

      Even if they called it Pentium 5 or 6, my guess is that it will still be the same core as the P4, just with a better process, and perhaps added instructions... sort of like the Pentium Pros, Pentium IIs Klamaths, and Pentium IIIs Katmai, Coppermine.. I know I am missing a bunch of them variations of the P6 die.

  22. Hmm... by skrowl · · Score: 1

    Why didn't they clone the athlon? It's faster and AMD is much less likely to sue the crud out of them than Intel.

    So when do the $100 Geforce3 Ti500 clones come out now?

    --

    Prevent linux based DDOS's!
    http://linux.denialofservice.org/
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why didn't they clone the athlon?

      Simple. Why didn't Dell, Gateway, etc. sell athlon computers? Anyway, Via chose Intel's platform more for the fact that there are more mobo's that take Intels floating around than take AMDs.

      As for the clone thing, no, it won't be exactly the same as a P4. It'll probably consume less energy, be more resourceful, and cost less to produce. When they say 'clone', they typically mean it'll mimic the instruction set.

  23. Good. by perdida · · Score: 4, Funny

    How will VIA have a competitive advantage?

    They will use substandard manufactoring processes, open chip plants in third world dictatorships, and provide less customer outreach and support.

    Good!

    Poor countries will get chipmaking infrastructure, and chip manufacturers will produce more cheaply. This part of the information economy is the part that can reach the poorest countries first; a factory job making chips is the first step towards participation in a western style net economy.

    VIA won't advertise with idiotic pitches like the Blue Men. Perhaps it will take another tack -- selling to budget computer makers.

    The chip cost is a big part of computer cost, so a cheaper chip will enable more companies to produce cheap computers, improving competition in this market sector.

    This is like spurring a housing market with a revolution in pre-fabricated housing. It makes possibilities available to an entirely new group of potential buyers.

  24. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    K5 announced they were going to clone the Invalid form key.

  25. Open Source processors!!! by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Funny
    I just had a great revelation (which occured when I banged my head on the router rack 5 minutes ago): we can take them all on with Open Source processors! You bring paperclips for wiring, I'll mix sand and lime for Silicon. We'll conquer the world as we did with software!

    Coming soon, Open Source hard drives. Does anyone have any spare beer coasters?

    1. Re:Open Source processors!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Source Hardware projects already exist

    2. Re:Open Source processors!!! by AlreadyStarted · · Score: 1

      Thats funny, but what I'd really like to see is a processor that can be fed some sort of arch deffinition, and then act like a certain processor to be compatable with existing systems. I want to be able to set my bios for i686 for development and then switch to G4 for graphic design. Then I would finally get to play around with osx;)

    3. Re:Open Source processors!!! by ajs · · Score: 2

      Open source hard-drives are easy. We just take lots of magnets and line them up on an LP. We can get about 2-3 bits per inch at about 5-10rpm!

    4. Re:Open Source processors!!! by Chakat · · Score: 1

      I know you're being silly, but the truth is stranger than fiction. It may not be paperclips and plaster, but its still open source.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    5. Re:Open Source processors!!! by mikeage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but just think. That kind of open source _will_ infect and destroy all closed source hard drives... at least if placed too close... maybe Microsoft was right about Open Source destroying everything it gets near...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    6. Re:Open Source processors!!! by PyroMosh · · Score: 1
      Isn't that what Transmeta's Curuso is supposed to do with it's Code Morphing technology?

  26. Oooops! by Glock27 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Via should have cloned Athlon instead! ;-)

    Regardless, the Hammer will be the processor of choice once it debuts.

    299,792,458 m/s...not just a good idea, its the law!

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:Oooops! by btellier · · Score: 1

      Much the way MS DRM v2 has been cracked, scientists have broken God's law of the speed of light. Let's just hope he doesn't get his unholy lawyers on their ass.

    2. Re:Oooops! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1
      Let's just hope he doesn't get his unholy lawyers on their ass.

      Arent all lawyers unholy?

  27. Cruise Missile knocking at your door ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Day-OH

    http://www.madblast.com/oska/humor_bin.swf

    - Penguins everywhere - arrggghh.

  28. WOW A 2GHZ CYRIX by KingKire64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    2GHZ lets see based on the cyrix methodaligies that would be something like 20 x 100mhz bus in real world standards that would be 13 x 33mhz bus. I wonder if this chip will retain the heat features. Imagine a chip running at 500 C. And they will be cheap just like thier ancestors. 25$ a chip so when it burns its self up in 3 months you go buy another. GOD I WANT ONE!

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
    1. Re:WOW A 2GHZ CYRIX by zsazsa · · Score: 2

      The latest VIA C3 (nee Cyrix III) processors dissipate only 8W of power, compared to many times that for both AMD and Intel processors (35-70 watts depending on the model.) Given halfway decent case airflow, C3s only require a passive heatsink (no fan.)

      Ian

  29. To go with thier P4 Motherboards by O.F.+Fascist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since intel is already hating on them for making a P4 chipset, and no mobo makers wanted to use it, VIA decided to make thier own motherboards, now this is just the next step why stop at making motherboards they are going to make the processors to go in them too.

  30. AMD did it... by justletmeinnow · · Score: 0

    Why would it cause legal trouble, isn't this basically what AMD did?

    --
    Just because I AM paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get me.
  31. The benefits outweigh the costs by weez75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems as if Via recognizes they will most likely be sued and be forced to forfeit some of their earnings if they clone Intel products. In the face of this, they also seem to feel that they can benefit enough to offset the losses caused by a lawsuit.

    A similar incident occurred with John Deere and Caterpillar about 5 years ago. Caterpillar had figured out that using a rubber-tracked farm tractor gives farmers better yields. John Deere literally stole the concept and accepted the lawsuit because what they learned was so valuable it was worth it!

    --
    Of course we torture people, we need the information --Gen. Pinochet
    1. Re:The benefits outweigh the costs by geekoid · · Score: 2

      whixh is funny, because the thing that gave John Deere his start was stolen from another industry!

      FYI, John Deere became famouse because he took the saws that were being used by lumber companies and sold them as plows. They worked better because of there coating, which removed the problem of dirt clumping onto the blade.
      how's that for more then you wanted to know?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Who said anythong about copying? by annenk138 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If P4 has been legitimately reverse-engineered, then VIA is beyond reproach. Typically, the companies who live by reverse-engineering go to great length to document the process. Of course, they'd have to pay hefty legal fees if that process is challenged in court, but for the giant like VIA this isn't much of a problem.

  33. Re: TOO FUNNY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    check this flash anim out!

  34. VIA predicts the future demise of AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Via is predicting the future. For now it seems that they can't make a motherboard for the chip .. but in the future the situation may be reversed .. they may not have a chip for their motherboards.


    AMD's (PR) rating of CPU's may very well be the end of AMD. Without a CPU to fill their motherboards VIA is going to need something of their own to fill the low price / high performance market segment we have all come to love.


    Enter the P4 clone.

  35. Rumor! by Spazntwich · · Score: 4, Funny

    This has already been debunked as a rumor!

    Way to go slashdot....

    http://www.theinquirer.net/19100103.htm - There's your linkified proof. :)

    1. Re:Rumor! by cppgodjavademigod · · Score: 1

      Yes. I was going to post the same comment.

  36. Surely this chip will.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    be outdated by the time they release it?

  37. Another look at the situation by cronik · · Score: 1

    Assuming that VIA is in fact trying to make a P4 clone, is it possibable that they are trying to force a takeover. If VIA is having internal problems might they be trying to get Intel to sue for stock?

    Otherwise this information is either a leak of gargantuan proportions or a hoax. I would personaly put my cash in the hoax theory.

    --
    Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
  38. History is repeating itself!! by MatrixManiac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When IBM first brought out their PCs they were
    "cloned". IBM brought on the lawsuits which
    ultimately failed. The important word here is
    "cloned" which has a different meaning then
    "copied". Cloning attempts reproduce the
    functionality of the cloned item by coming up
    with their own design. "Copying" makes an exact
    duplicate of the original, which of course would
    be illegal. (eg. like selling copied software CDs)

  39. Hmmm by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

    If anyone can (legally) make a x86 compatible processor nowadays, whats wrong with making one that will simply fit into a P4 socket? VIA can simply claim its a P4-clone and package a die of their own design. And I think that is what they're doing since it was mentioned in the article on The Register that there are 18 pipe stages in VIA's design.. and if I recall correctly, the P4 has greater than 20 pipeline stages.

    I don't ever recall AMD getting sued for making those Super 7 K6-2s and K6-3s CPUs.

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make a CPU compatible with Socket 8 (Pentium Pro) required a license from Intel for the bus, which it has used for its later CPUs. Exponential Technologies (maker of fast PowerPC clone microprocessors) got a license in exchange for use of its patents by Intel. Cyrix bought Exponential, then Via bought Cyrix, so Via might have the license (and is acting like it does). AFAIK the C3 is the only non-Intel chip for Socket 8, Slot One, or Socket 370.

  40. Would you buy a VIA cpu? by oman_ · · Score: 1

    Considering how much trouble I've had
    with VIA motherboard chipsets and random
    crashes I wouldn't touch a VIA cpu with
    a ten foot pole.

    --
    Rats would be more funny if they could fart.
  41. True cloning by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    Are they going to clone the heat too?

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  42. What they call it? Dolly the CPU? by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who wants a CPU that looks like a sheep

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  43. VIA P4 boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  44. What's wrong with this? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    It seems from the article that all they are doing is making a chip that will be compatible with systems that are also compatible with the P4. All they mean by "P4 Clone" is that you can use it interchangeably with a P4. The only other similarity mentioned in the articles is the 18 stage pipeline, but there are so many ways of implementing such a pipeline that I doubt VIA's will be exactly the same. All in all, I say this is good competition, although it probably won't amount to much.

    --

    ~ now you know
  45. TROLL ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look folks, it's a troll. Chip fatories in 3rd world countries the first step towards participation in a western style net economy? Adequacy.org link in the .sig? Don't feed the trolls.

  46. Not gonna sell. by billcopc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    VIA can produce all the cpu it likes, I won't be buying any of them. If they still can't produce a stable motherboard chipset after years of research and practice, then how could they manage a completely functional x86 processor core ? I don't think they can do it well enough to chew into Intel.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Not gonna sell. by JavaFox · · Score: 1

      VIA's chipsets and its CPUs are completely different creatures. Their CPUs are based on the research and work of different companies they acquired -- Cyrix, IDT, and Centaur.

      Whether or not any of THOSE companies can produce a completely functional x86 is up for debate, but you should realize that the work that has gone into the development of VIA CPUs belongs to other companies, and not VIA itself.

  47. Competition for AMD by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This seems like in the end they would be competition for AMD rather than Intel.

    The market for these would be people who are not already emotionally/contractually tied to Intel. This space is primarily held by AMD. Via is less likely to get any customers out of Intel. They are more likely to take customers from AMD.

    Sure Intel will gripe, but if they're smart they'll let VIA in just enough to pound AMD.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  48. great... by superflex · · Score: 1, Troll
    yet another company building on the terrible, terrible x86 architecture.

    legacy code can lick my cajones, that piece of garbage should have been dropped a long time ago.

    --
    sigs are for suckers
  49. The Budget Computer Market by Victors+Monster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is already known to be highly saturated. Will VIA's chips be signifigantly cheaper than the Celrons or Durons (or at least have a better cost-to-performance ratio?) If so, will that margin be enough to keep the company afloat?

    This sounds like something that would have been a great idea a year or two ago, but in this competitive (and now saturated) market, it will be tough going for the guys at VIA.

    1. Re:The Budget Computer Market by linzeal · · Score: 0
      I'm running a via c3 in a microatx case for divx playback on my tv. It runs without a heatsink and only gets up to 50c (700mhz).

      They run cool I'll giv them that and they can play atari/apple II/etc emulators just fine :)

    2. Re:The Budget Computer Market by linzeal · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Damnit meant no fan on the heatsink, doh.

    3. Re:The Budget Computer Market by mal0rd · · Score: 1

      I'm also running one of the new C3s. At 800Mhz, it appears about the performance equivelent of my slot A 500Mhz Athlon, while costing as much as a 800Mhz. Without this chip, however, it would have been more difficult to build a nearly-silent PC.
      I hope if VIA makes a Pentium 4 clone they make it run very cool so no fan is needed, because it is my opinion that quiet operation is the only selling point for their chips. I really am craving a silent, multiple gigahertz PC.

  50. Yay. More instability. by NinjaPablo · · Score: 1

    If VIA had cloned AMD it would still be pitiful. You can now have a mobo that causes problems with a constantly overheating proc that causes even more!

    Besides that, I think that the core legal issue that VIA would face over this would be the Intel extentions such as SSE2, MMX, etc, and not over the core x86 instruction set (which they apparently have a license for)

    --
    SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
  51. ...and I say GO VIA!! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Alternatives for the platform could be very good. Think of the Socket 7 architecture in retrospect. They ended up going much faster than the marketing people at Intel would have liked! People still use K6-2s and K6-IIIs, but who would use a p200 in this age?

    this is another blow against no competition (note the double negative). intel no longer has the only chip for the p4 platform. This is good for consumers and it is good for the industry. Way to go Via!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  52. Look a bit further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree IA32 is a horrible mess. PPC is very nice. Alpha was even better but we all know what happened to it. And ignoring all the emphasis placed on backward compatibility, IA64 is not bad.

    I think people should be looking ahead and developing clones for Itanium processors. Right now pre-made Itanium systems start around $14,000. I'm probably wrong, but I can't see cloning a raw Itanium processor (without the complete backward compatibility) being a lot harder than cloning the Pentium 4.

    I hate programming for IA32. And because of Intel's monopoly, IA64 is the only logical next step. I wish people would just make IA64 affordable. Or at least add Itanium support in BOCHS.

  53. Re: TOO FUNNY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't run in XFree86/Linux very well.

    got a portable format you would like to share?

  54. Ohhhh, give me a clone..... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    where the buff...err..shee...errrr...pent...

    damn, I give up.

    Copyright means we get to *copy it, right*?

    I had to say it, sorry.

    But this begs the questions: Why? People lambasted the design of the P4 for bringing us what is in essence a 2Ghz+ 486, right?

    Why on god's green earth would someone want to immitate rather than innovaaaa...

    Ooops, never mind.

    Moose

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  55. hodgepodge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this chip going to have the P4's weird mix of RISC and not architecture? If it is purely RISC like the PPC then they might be onto something... Of course alternative ideas have been around for a while... http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/00q1/000317/

  56. How does the DMCA (or similar law) apply here by ahde · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be illegal for Intel to reverse engineer the Jericho 4 and find out if it used reverse engineered components from the pentium 4?

  57. Your sig is scary. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    "-I don't have a god complex, god has a ME complex"

    If the Omniscient One is so deluded that He wants to use MS Windows Millenium Edition, than we're all lost. Imagine your world suddenly stopping, the sky goes blue, and then God hits the Reset button. Wait, the sky is blue right now, AHHH!!!!

  58. Re: TOO FUNNY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It runs fine on Slackware... you need the flash plugin to run it.

  59. Who cares by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    By the time they come up with the P4 perfected, they'll be obsolete... probably big time obsolete.
    Would be good for maybe a Nintendo Gameboy or something, though. Hehe..

  60. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the matter, moderators? can't stand different opinions? still high on crack?

  61. Obsolete by hahnar2k · · Score: 1

    "SOURCES CLOSE TO VIA said that an employee who seemed to hint that the firm had a Pentium 4 clone it might launch in 2004 hasn't been taken out and shot but is being advised to shop around for a bullet with his name on it."

    Hmm...2004...i don't think anyone wants a p4 type chip in 2004...Does anyone? This thing accoording to the current rate of changing avery 1-1.5 years by 2004 this thing will be like...a waste of time. Why doesn't via just concentrate on making good mobo chip thingys?

  62. What dou you say? Are you crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that you only use your computer to play games is not a good reason to the _top 2GHz_ that you are talking about because there are many many applications that just fuck or do not exist due to the lack of MHz :-)

    And IMHO, the actual games just fuck.