Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Retail, Preparedness, Games

Tonight in Slashback: More on TransGaming's approach to the world (and licenses), another sweet box of French Linux goodness, another piece of the stolen-Enigma puzzle is pressed firmly into place, and a small piece of travel advice.

"Getting off easy" defined. dgroskind writes: "This AP story might be interesting as a slashback followup to an item about the theft of the Enigma machine from Bletchly Park. The accused got 10 months with the charge of blackmail left open for possible later prosecution. Also, this story today says a U.S. spy tipped off the Germans that the Enigma code had been broken but they didn't believe it."

Of course, you could tell your boss it got blown up. You may have already written your congressional representatives (especially if you live in South Carolina) about Fritz Holling's proposed SSSCA, but for air-traveling technical types, there's another post-bomb consideration. cloudscout writes: "In the past, I've always been nervous before travelling... am I remembering my toothpaste? Razor? Shoes? Now I've learned there is something else to remember. Charge my batteries. The current state of air travel security means more random searches and since I tend to travel with lots of electronic gadgets, these searches take a while and they test every device. I was chosen for a random search. Notebook, PDA, Digital Camera, Camcorder, Cellphone... the MiniDisc player had a dead battery. I was stuck. I didn't know what to do. They demanded that I prove the devices functionality. I dug around in my bag and, luckily, was able to take a battery from another device in order to power up the MD but it could have been a much worse situation if I didn't have a spare battery. The lesson here? If you're going to fly, be prepared."

Last week, flying between several supposedly very security-conscious airports (Dulles, Munich, Berlin, Frankfurt), I never had to turn my laptop on, probably because I had carefully charged the battery beforehand.

I'll believe it when I record my 2nd sample FMD disk. Perhaps unimpressed with the perpetually promised quarter-sized CDs mentioned the other day, an Anonymous Coward writes: "What optical medium has 8 layers, stores 24 GBs, and plays at 22Mbits/sec? And it's just the first age, with plans to reach 140 GB soon afterwards. Constellation 3D are developing FMD-ROM format that will change the capacity of data storage we use today, furtheir information can be obtained from FMD insider which is a news site that reports the progress and general information about this product. Constellation 3D seem to have lowered their expectations of their first line of products, to something more realistic and affordable, and they expect to make the technology available to some markets by the end of 2002.
Are you ready?"

Street performances need to beware Sturgeon's Law. joestar writes "As said on Slashdot this week-end, Transgaming is about to release - with Electronic Arts and MandrakeSoft - a special Linux distro aimed at games called Mandrake Linux Gaming Edition. Their technology - WineX - is actually a DirectX to Mesa translator that allows to port most recent Windows games to Linux apparently very efficiently compared to a simple Wine port. A great article with lots of details about that project GameSpyDaily has just been released. By the way, WineX is released under the Alladin License."

Picking your poison gets more complicated. Red Hat 7.2 is out, but as you might expect, MandrakeSoft isn't sitting still: The newest Mandrake, 8.1, is also available in stores. (But when will 8.1 PPC be ready? ;))

105 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. The value of an Enigma by joel.neely · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just found it interesting that one of two surviving Enigma boxen is "valued at" $144,000. How would such a figure be determined? (I assume that standard "what it would bring at auction" concepts don't apply, there being only two instances, neither of which is -- any more -- on the open market.)

    1. Re:The value of an Enigma by PD · · Score: 2

      Insurance sets the value. If you don't have any clue what some unique artifact is worth, just buy a million bucks worth of insurance for it. If you lose it, you'll find that it was worth a million bucks.

      Seriously, appraisers take a look at the thing. They take their best guess at what it's worth, what it could fetch at auction or sale, and they declare it to be that value.

    2. Re:The value of an Enigma by darkonc · · Score: 2
      appraising the value of (relatively) unique items is difficult at best. A friend of mine has been studying silversmithing for a few years. He was recently comissioned to do a 1/3 scale solid silver broadsword. It was delivered this summer, and the person who comissioned the work sent it off to get appraised. Months later, the appraiser still hasn't figured out a price.

      I can think of two obvious issues to take into account when trying to value a unique item: One would be replacement cost --- how much would it cost to have someone replace the appearance and functionality of the pice. The other would be putting some sort of ballpark on the fact that it's an "original", and even a functional equivalent wouldn't be quite the same.

      Pieces like the Mona Lisa are called 'priceless' -- I assume because it's believed that nobody could really do a 'good enough' copy of the piece if it were lost -- and they probably make enough off of the piece that any price payable wouldn't really cover the loss in revenues.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    3. Re:The value of an Enigma by Troed · · Score: 2
      Crappy appraiser - the cost is what your friend (should be contacted) or someone like him would charge to do another one.

    4. Re:The value of an Enigma by darkonc · · Score: 2

      The intent was to get an independant appraisal. The problem is, apparently, finding someone else who could/would do something similar.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    5. Re:The value of an Enigma by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > > I just found it interesting that one of two surviving Enigma boxen is "valued at" $144,000.
      > What? Didn't we just hear an announcement [slashdot.org] that Enigma is free (as in beer AND speech)?

      And besides, why pay $144,000 for a cryptosystem that was cracked 60 years ago?

      Oh, I get it, that's gonna be the "civilian-grade" encryption US companies will be allowed to use when all this terrorist mess is over ;-)

      (And under DMCA, reading about Bletchley Park is illegal -- so evidently the first American to buy an Enigma and cr4x0r it again will have a big leg up on the rest of us ;-)

  2. Airport security by Rombuu · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Last week, flying between several supposedly very security-conscious airports (Dulles, Munich, Berlin, Frankfurt), I never had to turn my laptop on, probably because I had carefully charged the battery beforehand.

    Hell, I flew the first day they opened up air traffic after Sept 11th, and then seven or eight times in the next couple of weeks through lots of airports, carrying a laptop, a cell phone, a palm pilot, and a GBA and was never asked to turn any of them on.

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Airport security by compwizrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've walked through the metal detectors at Detroit Metro, with two sets of keyrings, my sunglasses, and about 10-15 dollars of loonies and toonies(bigger than your US dollar coins), and not set the alarm off. There were 10 keys total on the keyring, and the change is a fair mass, along with the sunglasses.

      I'm sure a knife or something has a lot less mass in it.

      I walked through security at Philadelphia doing similar, and the detector beeped. I had been standing in the arch for a few seconds, waiting for the person in front of me. So what did they do? Told me to walk through it again, and when it didn't beep, that was it.

      White Plains(New york) and Dulles are more competent though, they're doing scans with the hand batons, and pat down searches as well. Random bag checks too. National Guard with M16's waiting too. Neither DTW or PHL seemed to be doing bag checks when i was there. Unarmed guards at DTW and IAD, from what i saw.

      Then again HPN didn't check the end pocket of my duffle bag when they searched it, where I had all my stuff like toothbrushes, shaving stuff, etc.

    2. Re:Airport security by ca1v1n · · Score: 2

      A knife would have sharp edges. Sharp edges do much stranger things to magnetic fields than keys and coins do. A large knife would probably be detected, though a small boxcutter might still get through. As we now know, it doesn't take much.

  3. Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by ajuda · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't it possible to hide a weapon or explosive inside of a working device? I mean, there is plenty of room inside the average laptop to stick some nasties... What's the point of making people turn these devices on?

    1. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Informative

      that's a good point. you can tuck something inside a second battery slot or empty drive slot. But then again, laptops are required to still go through the xray machine, where something would (hopefully) be found.

      But honestly, I dont know what turning something on would provide. A terrorist can always key a fake electronic device to act like a real device when placed under inspection. A cell phone is perfect for that, as they dont go through xray nor metal detectors (at least that was the case last time I was at an airport last August), and all one has to do is turn on the backlight or display panel.

      Maybe it's just a false sense of security that some policy maker thought up.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by czardonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the point of making people turn these devices on?

      Their aim is to squander your valuable time on creating a false sense of security. They know that it would take real money and effort to provide security measures that might actully prevent a person from bringing a weapon on board a plane. So, in order to maximise shareholder value, they gamble on these illusory measures. Terrorism is still quite rare, so they take the chance.

      How often do you hear about some local investigative reporter sneaking a gun through security. How often do you hear about an ACTUAL criminal being foiled by these measures. (And what's with the National Guard. Are they afraid that terrorists are going to storm the gates?

      More than anything, these are publicity stunts. By harassing the general public, they create the false sense that security is strict.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    3. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      It's the same thing as confiscating fingernail clippers from little old ladies.

    4. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by OmegaDan · · Score: 2
      There must be *some* reason. I think in 97 or 98 I was at a bob dole rally (my g/f drug me), and the secret service checked everyone who was close to bob dole -- demonstrate cell phones, examine pagers, and they made me show them my pilot 1000 ... curiously they'd never seen one before but they were satisfied to look at the program manager.

      Curiously, I attended a sunny bono and was close enuf to spit on him and no one cared :)

      (These anticdotes shouldn't be considered an endorsement of republicanism)

    5. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2
      Many moons ago, Penn Jillette (the talking half of Penn & Teller) wrote a column for PC Magazine. Well known for practical jokes and a sense of humor that skirts the borders of sick, he once suggested an autoexec.bat file for laptops that went something like this:

      echo off
      echo Arming....
      echo Armed...
      echo 10...
      echo 9...
      echo 8...


      Decidedly NOT recommended in these hypersensitive times!

      Will you kill him in his bed? Stick a dagger in his head? I would not, could not kill the king. I would not do this evil thing. I will not wed this girl, you see. So get her to a nunnery. -- Green Eggs and Hamlet
    6. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by bluehell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cell phones have to go through the airport's xray, at least in the european airports i've been to lately (london stansted, salzburg, frankfurt). actually i had to put everything except my clothes in my bag, even my newspapers, and this bag had to go through the xray. you and your clothes go through the metal detector then. the only things that don't get checked by the metal detectors or the xray are your keys and your wallet.

      us airports HAVE to learn a lot more about security. i can't believe you were able to go tothe gates WITHOUT a ticket... european airports have a stronger sense of security, because almost every flight is an international flight.

      --
      -- To bloody go where no man has gone before.
    7. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      Put in some delay between the counting - the way it is right now, it would just rush down and then display the DOS prompt. A delay function of 1000ms in between every echo and echoing a CTRL-G would most likely get you shot pretty fast nowadays.

      --
      +++ath0
    8. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by Argy · · Score: 2

      Definitely room for nasties in a functioning laptop. I've got a Panasonic industrial laptop, with a decently thick metal exterior...I've always wondered if you couldn't just stick a loaded handgun in the swappable FD/CD-ROM slot. But I gather law enforcement takes a dim view of "I was just testing to see whether it would get through or not." :-)

    9. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by Teferi · · Score: 2

      I have an Inspiron 8k. The batteries are actually pretty damn small, considering the amount of life I get out of 'em.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    10. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      Yes please try that. And while you are in prison you can tell us what it is like.

      Unless the case is lead the Xrays will go right through.

      on a funny note: when I was much younger the xray operator had a troubled look on his face as my backpack went through the xray machine. He pulled me aside and asked what was in my backpack pointing at the xray screen. It was a box of well packed lego with the old big red, blue, and yellow gears. I guess it looked like a big machenical bomb. :)

    11. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by s390 · · Score: 2

      you can tuck something inside a second battery slot or empty drive slot. But then again, laptops are required to still go through the xray machine, where something would (hopefully) be found.

      Not really. LiMH has a density (what airport xray machines "see") similar to C4/Semtex, i.e., rather dense. That's one reason why the FAA has installed explosives "sniffer machines" at major airports. I guess they figure terrorists will be sloppy enough to fashion their bombs in the same space where they keep the luggage they'll use to carry them. Of course, the FAA never dreamed anyone would hijack airplanes with box-cutters either.

      Of course, people _really_ interested in personal defense capability have been carrying concealed ceramic knives for 10 years or more on airplanes.
      And after reloading small-arms ammo, always wash your hands before packing. Not doing so might result in major inconvenience later at the airport.

    12. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by Teferi · · Score: 2

      Oh, absolutely...but I love it. Huge screen, nice gfx card, and so on.
      The battery is significantly smaller than the battery from my old Quantex N30W (Dell sold it as the Inspiron 5000), and seems to last longer, just making that point.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    13. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      So, in order to maximise shareholder value, they gamble on these illusory measures. Terrorism is still quite rare, so they take the chance.

      I don't think this is the case at all. Planes are expensive, lawsuits from families of passengers are expensive, reputational damage is expensive. Given the choice, the average airline would have excellent security. If they didn't, the auditors employed by their insurers would up the premiums.

      More than anything, these are publicity stunts. By harassing the general public, they create the false sense that security is strict.


      No, this is just general, federal-grade cluelessness. Like there is a no standing rule on some flights now. Exactly how does that help? How does being asked to empty your pockets more than once help? How does banning metal cutlery from the diner in the waiting area help?

      What we are seeing here is officials who have absolutely no idea how to deal with the threat grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to show that they are doing "something". I certainly don't feel any safer; all this has proved is that security is *worse* than anyone suspected, since these people clearly don't know what they're doing.

    14. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by mellon · · Score: 2
      This is pretty obvious if you think about it. Batteries are extremely dense energy storage devices. What's another dense energy storage device? Plastique. Do they look different on the X-ray? Probably not enough to tell.

      So they make you turn the device on to make sure that your energy-storage device stores electrical energy, not kinetic energy. This makes perfect sense, and what concerns me is that they don't always check.

    15. Re:Am I the only one who doesn't get this? by blang · · Score: 2
      Then there are plastic guns

      According to this laws have been passed to ban manufactoring of any guns that can not be spotted on x-ray. However, I can imagine any handy man a la mcgyver could construct a gun concealed as a working cigarette lighter, working ballpoint pen, and bottle of sugar coated vitamin pills for bullets.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  4. Windows = NonFunctional? by terpia · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what if some clueful person in security (yeah yeah I know its not likely) decides that my compnay laptop with Win2k is a "non-functional device"? They'd be pretty much right of course, but does that mean I can't take it with me?

    --
    .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
  5. Enigma... by jeffy124 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...hmmm ....

    You'd think the Germans would have figured out that someone cracked Enigma when the Allied forces knew about their secret plans on a consistent basis.

    OTOH, kudos to the Brits for knowing how to handle decrypted info. In Zimmermann's Note, for example, they intercepted and cracked the original message, but made it look like lax security in Mexico compromised the Note to the US.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:Enigma... by Indomitus · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the main problems the English had with using the Enigma information was to make sure the Germans thought they got the information in other ways. For instance, if they caught a message that said a ship convoy was headed in a certain direction, they would fly planes over a large area that included the area where the ships were so the Germans would think they accidently got caught. They didn't actually use Enigma information that often without getting the information some other way (spies, reconnaissance, etc) IIRC.

    2. Re:Enigma... by casret · · Score: 2

      If Neal Stephenson is to be believed in Cryptonomicon, Turing used information theory to only use just enough secret information that would be attributable to chance.

    3. Re:Enigma... by kzinti · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd think the Germans would have figured out that someone cracked Enigma when the Allied forces knew about their secret plans on a consistent basis.

      The Allies were very careful to disguise the source of their knowledge. A target was never struck without first sending out a reconnaissance mission and letting the Germans spot it. Or so the pop-history sources say. You can also read about this sort of thing in Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon.

      --Jim

    4. Re:Enigma... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Which is also a good idea - disinformation is also sent via coded messages on occasion, so you need to make sure that the message was accurate before you deploy forces.

    5. Re:Enigma... by DCowern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could you imagine a beowulf cluster of these...

      Oh... wait... nevermind. ;-)

    6. Re:Enigma... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      yup. That's what the case was in Zimmermann's Note.

      The story goes that he transmitted it from Berlin to the Mexican Ambassador to the US in Washington DC, and that is what was picked up by the Brits. Some of the Note was intended for him, the rest was to be sent on to Mexico City, including that part about regaining control of some of the southwestern US states.

      The Brits knew that the Ambassador would rewrite the note before passing on the appropriate parts to Mexico City. The Brits did that and then gave the note to the US.

      When Germany investigated the compromise (after it became known that the US had the Note), they concluded that poor security by the Mexicans allowed an Allied spy to find the message in Mexico City. Hence they continued using Enigma on messages and the Brits continued cracking them.

      That (and the example you give) allowed the Allied forces to continue breaking messages, because they feared the Axis powers would begin using a different encyption technique should they find out about the compromise of Enigma.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    7. Re:Enigma... by kzinti · · Score: 2

      disinformation is also sent via coded messages on occasion, so you need to make sure that the message was accurate before you deploy forces.

      That hadn't occurred to me - at least not in this context. My understanding is that the Germans were so confident in the security of Enigma that they would have considered disinformation unnecessary.

      --Jim

    8. Re:Enigma... by aurispector · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AFAIK this is correct. The nazis were being told by their crypto guys that it was mathematically impossible to crack enigma. The british finished work begun by the poles exploiting subtle flaws in the system that allowed it to be cracked.

      The quality of information flowing over enigma confirmed to the allies that the nazis never lost faith in the basic concept embodied by enigma, even if they did add rotors later in the war.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    9. Re:Enigma... by hayden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the end they were unhappy if they didn't have that days code by 6am (they were changed at midnight). The shortest time it took was 10 minutes.

      It was actually a screw up by a German signals officer which gave the British the biggest gains in cracking the code. The officer sent a message but it was scrambled at the receiving end and a retransmit was requested. What he should have done was reset the wheels to what they were and resent the message so sending exactly the same thing again. What he actually did was send the message again with a new wheel setting. Thus giving the British two different encryptions of the same text.

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    10. Re:Enigma... by Detritus · · Score: 2

      You forgot the part where the Germans tattooed the message on the scalp of an young Austrian corporal, A. Schickelgruber, let his hair grow out and sent him to Mexico via the German submarine U-571. The British destroyer HMS "Two Sheds" Jackson depth charged the submarine and forced it to the surface. An alert Royal Navy lieutenant, Alfred Hill, noticed the tattoo and covertly made a transcription of it for RN Intelligence. The crew of the U-571 was turned over to the Mexican authorities for repatriation. The message was decoded by British codebreakers and passed to the Foreign Office. Prime Minister Robert Borden passed the decoded message on to the Americans.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Enigma... by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      You forgot the part where the Germans tattooed the message on the scalp of an young Austrian corporal, A. Schickelgruber


      Huh? Is there something I am missing? Schicklgruber was Hitler's family name before he changed it. And Hitler indeed was serving the army in Austria in WWI (but he was not ranked corporal but private).
      --
      +++ath0
    12. Re:Enigma... by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I think you missed 'HMS "two sheds" Jackson', a name from a Monty Python sketch. A fairly funny sketch, at that.

      -Paul Komarek

    13. Re:Enigma... by Grab · · Score: 2

      They thought it was unbreakable though. And the work required to change every Enigma everywhere would have been incredible. Mind you, just changing the rotor designs would've stopped the Brits breaking it for a while.

      But the thing is, the British very quickly developed good radar, so incoming planes weren't a surprise, and the RAF established air superiority so that incoming raids were hugely expensive for the Luftwaffe. And when the convoys were really getting hit bad, the Brits came up with seriously effective sonar, so attacking convoys became hugely expensive for the U-boats, and radio direction-finding could pinpoint a U-boat fast when it came up to transmit. And finally, the desert troops (after getting beat up a bit) eventually started kicking ass. So generally, I reckon it wasn't too surprising for the Germans when shit happened. The Enigma information was mainly used to inform the Allies of general strategy so that it could be counteracted, and there's little difference between fighting an enemy who knows what you're doing, and fighting an enemy who's a good strategist and has good technology. They just assumed we had good generals and good gear.

      And even the _Americans_ didn't believe the British could break Enigma. The British told the Americans there was a U-boat off the US coast. The Americans ignored the warning. The U-boat sank a large number of ships in US harbours. The Americans then looked around and said, "Hey, you guess mebbe them Limeys was tellin' the truth?" DOH!

      Grab.

    14. Re:Enigma... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      The officer sent a message but it was scrambled at the receiving end and a retransmit was requested.

      Wasn't that the trick behind figuring out the other important code the Germans had? The one which was basically a binary XOR with a key?

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    15. Re:Enigma... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      that wasnt the problem for the allied forces. They feared that if the germans would truly find out about Enigma's compromise, they would simply pull out a backup plan or quickly throw one together, which would mean trouble for those responsible for decrypting those messages.

      Yes, technology did advance in radar, sonar, etc, but SIGINT was still a very critical piece of the war.

      D-Day was another example. The Allied forces knew that one of their encryption schemes (whatever it was) had been broken by the Axis powers. So during the planning of D-Day, the Allies sent out false plans using that encryption just to let the Axis powers find it. That's why the Axis troops weren't at Normandy the morning of D-Day, the troops were at another location far away from Normandy. Yes there were still troops to contend with at Normandy, but that was a very small number because most of them were sent to the other location.

      Some call that a key piece to ending the war in Europe, or at least to the success of D-Day for the Allies.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  6. Re:Broken devices by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
    If it's broken, why carry it onboard? Why not check it in your suitcase?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  7. Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How are you supposed to write to your representative if their mail isn't getting delivered, due to the Anthrax scare?

    1. Re:Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by Kefabi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't mail. Fax. They will get it, they don't have to worry about anthrax, and sending something by fax seems a lot more spiffier to them than by standard mail.

    2. Re:Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      I was listening to NPR on the way home from work today. There was a story about how anthrax spores were found in the area where mail for the whitehouse is tranfered from one mailroom to the next and is checked. Officials were quoted as saying are considering burning all the unopened mail in the facility destined for the whitehouse in order to protect the president and whitehouse staff. Does anyone else see anything wrong with this?

    3. Re:Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by SEE · · Score: 2

      Telegram. When you care enough to pay $9.95 to send a 1000-character-maximum message.

    4. Re:Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by cymen · · Score: 2

      Not really. Why even accept public mail to the Whitehouse? What is the value? Little Timothy got to write to old Georgie? I say burn it all and start refusing delivery!

    5. Re:Speaking of Hollings and the SSSCA by Zach+Baker · · Score: 2

      As far as I can tell, Western Union merely types up submitted telegrams on their stationery and sends them Airborne Express next-day. Sure, more expensive than a fax, but probably given regard approaching actual handwritten mail (unlike faxes and in particular email).

  8. FMD disk by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    Wow! I should be able to fit my entire DVD collection on just a couple of these babies! (For archival purposes, of course.)

  9. Oh come on. by Gannoc · · Score: 2
    in order to power up the MD but it could have been a much worse situation if I didn't have a spare battery.

    Yeah, if you can't prove the device works, they incinerate it, and sometimes you as well.

  10. Communism? by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny
    Like this?

    ;-)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  11. At least your airport has checks... by stoopidguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm kind of scared to fly out of JIA [Jacksonville, FL] because the past three flights I have been on since Sept. 11th I have had no sort of extra search. I do not mind consenting to a quick frisking or the like; but absolutely no heightened security frightens me. Same thing with the Jags games; I can walk right into the gate as usual. And if I happen to be pushing kegs (working at the stadium stocking booths for extra money) then I can carry a duffel bag in without even getting a strange look. Security seems to be a joke down here. Also, before you guys tell me "we don't need no stinking searches" and "searches are a false sense of security"; I do agree with the statements somewhat. It is a false sense of security, but it is extremely sad to next to no-security at our airports even after the attacks that occurred.

    1. Re:At least your airport has checks... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      There has been nothing in any air serurity that wouldn't allow this to happen again. nothing,0, zip, nada.
      really the only thing that would prevent this again is the fact if you and 3 of your buds stood up with knife, you would get the sh*t kicked out of you by the other passengers. There's your security.
      And if someone wants to bring a plane down, do you really think they need to be on it?
      The only thing these new security measures will impact is honest persons lives.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. SuSE 7.3 by FreakOfTheWeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget about SuSE 7.3...annother distro to keep an eye on this week.

  13. Mandrake Linux 8.1 Beta 1 "Raklet" reference by Black+Acid · · Score: 2, Informative
    For those interested in the new features of Mandrake 8.1, be sure to check out this information. The newest killer features include, according to their website:
    • Draknet (network configuration tool), test and enjoy this thoroughly reworked version.
    • Support for the Euro
    • Mime Type managing reworked
    • Renewed URPMI (package installer) and Software Manager
    • The reworked Mandrake Control Center will provide a convenient embedded root console as well as new tools such as Logdrake, a graphical frontend to the system log files, or Drakinst, which allows easy setup of an auto-install disk.
    • Renewed HardDrake (disk partitioner)
    • Fresh version of PrinterDrake to get all the power of your printer.

    Although Beta 1 obviously has less features than the final release, it's a good read.

    I admit I'm a bit confused as to what they mean by "support for the Euro" - isn't is supported given Unicode support, character U+20AC? If anyone is curious, I recommend Microsoft's FAQ on the Euro.

    1. Re:Mandrake Linux 8.1 Beta 1 "Raklet" reference by tdye · · Score: 2

      My guess is that it's marketing akin to the "designed for Windows 95" labels you saw on keyboards and mousepads and blank floppy disks, back when 95 was released.

      People here in Ireland are freaking out hardcore about the Euro changeover, and there's a marketing campaign going on that's only slightly less vigorous than the Win95 one was.

  14. a newbie's opinion on RedHat 7.2 vs. Mandrake 8.1 by NeoTomba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First off, I'm a Linux newbie. I've been running Linux for a month. Despite that, I've picked up a lot of stuff quickly. I started off with Mandrake 8.0, which, while good, seemed a little outdated.

    And it was. 2 days later Mandrake 8.1 came out. I upgraded, and though buggy, its extremely nice.

    However, I've been waiting for RH7.2 for quite some time. I installed RH years ago with my friend Peter, but we didn't know how to do shit (though we did manage to install it fine, go figure). If only we had known to type "startx" maybe we could have become linux zealots back in high school.

    In any case, RH 7.2 blows me away. The installation interface is very professional and the default configurations are rock solid. I saw no need to personalize every little thing since everything looked so good right off. Mandrake, despite its simplicity in so many areas, required much more configuration, in my opinion. Theres a lot to set up, and Mozilla still isn't it's default browser.

    If I only I knew enough to mount my windows partition under RH 7.2, I might start using it instead of Mandrake.

    But then, its only a short wait for the 8.1 gaming edition to come out, and maybe I'll switch again. Linux is fun like that.

    Don't flame me too hard for these uninformed opinions. I apologize ahead of time for being too stupid to mount my windows partition.
    -NeoTomba

  15. Re:Repeats by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 2

    Come on, this is slashback. The whole point of this is to revisit previous articles and point out any new developments about the topics.

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  16. *nix laptops? by terpia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On a serious note, *Nix users beware:
    On an international flight coming back into the states, I was taken aside and told I matched a profile and I would be searched. I was told this wasnt unusual and was for the safety of everyone. They decided that my laptop did need to be scanned. For what exactly, I have never been sure. I was running Redhat at the time and their scanning machine had NO provisions for *nix OSes...and I was questioned as to why I was NOT running windows. (like i was automatically suspect because of this!) They had to bring in a computer "expert" (an airport IT guy) to evaluate the computer. He seemed clued in to what was going on and after a quick look see, assured the security goons that there was nothing on my laptop that could end the world. This whole process took almost 2 hours, which isnt terribly long, but long enough to miss my connecting flight out. The moral to this? Be prepared to explain yourself if you have anything the security guys dont recognize.

    --
    .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    1. Re:*nix laptops? by statusbar · · Score: 2

      Is this true?

      What airport did this happen at?

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    2. Re:*nix laptops? by terpia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alas, that laptop suffered a catastrophic failure. (apparently it had an issue with the pint of beer i tried to kindly nourish it with...) And my current laptop? Company owned and running win2k, but i do carry a QNX floppy disk so i can feel cool....

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    3. Re:*nix laptops? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      Nice tricks, but what if someone there has half a clue and they realize you're faking the OS? Dunno if you'd get into trouble eventually, but it might take a lot of explaining.. and it's not usually good to piss off those officers. It's like the smart-asses who send flour or something in letters to mimic anthrax deliveries.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:*nix laptops? by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      I was running Redhat at the time and their scanning machine had NO provisions for *nix OSes...

      So, they were scanning the machine for the HDD contents?? Damn weird!

      When I was travelling to the US (from Frankfurt) 4 years ago I was travelling with a broken laptop - get me right, all the stuff worked fine and my data was on it, but someone special had just stepped on the screen and it would show absolutely nothing except for all these beautiful cracks.

      Then they told me they either had to get visual confirmation of this being a computer or *at least* some beeping from the machine. Well, it was a DRDOS/4DOS machine, and some CTRL-G's later I was allowed to continue...

      --
      +++ath0
    5. Re:*nix laptops? by terpia · · Score: 2

      wow, certainly a lot of BS calling here....but of course I have nothing to substantiate this with except my word. At any rate I certainly dont think I look like the cnn stereotyped terrorist. I really dont know what they were looking for; if it was child porn, stolen software or what...

      Another thing that i wonder about security officers checking electronic devices is that with one the size of a laptop, couldn't the battery be replaced by one of the same external size, having a just small battery inside with enough power to boot up, but enough extra space to store/transport drugs/explosives/anthrax/etc? I dont know what betteries look like going thru an xray machine...but I assume they are pretty dense and thus a bit easier to disguise a replacement.

      --
      .sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
    6. Re:*nix laptops? by anticypher · · Score: 2

      So, they were scanning the machine for the HDD contents??

      British security has been scanning hard drives for years now. I've been scanned twice entering the UK, once at heathrow (missed an important morning meeting, cost me a bundle) and once at Waterloo after getting off the Eurostar.

      Go search on The Register and you will find some articles about the UK system. They have no problem scanning solaris x86 UFS, linux ext2fs, or any other system. They take the HD out of the laptop, copy the whole thing in a machine that apparently does a low level bit copy including boot tracks and bad sectors, and later scan for *ANY* pr0n. They will also copy every CD you have. The process takes at least an hour, during which they offer you the worst tea or coffee ever produced, bad even by low UK standards.

      Everyone I know who travels regularly into London for work knows to clean out their browser caches, and to make sure if someone sends the funny pic of the day of a woman+dog, to scrub the free space with some utility. There have been prosecutions for some poor fools, mostly they just hit you up with a large fine. If you don't pay it, expect to be arrested next trip through customs. One good friend has a court appearance soon to justify all of the software found on his system, they won't tell him the exact list they found, but he had Oracle 8i and a ton of development apps licensed to his workplace, and they aren't cooperating.

      Searches at PDX sound like a hunt for pr0n that is legal in Japan but totally offends American tastes. Pr0n that may be legal in the US is still illegal to import or export.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    7. Re:*nix laptops? by anticypher · · Score: 2

      Anyway if they want my pr0n they will have to decrypt the pgpdisk volume first.

      Ahhh, you haven't heard about the RIP act. If the police (any policeman, whether acting for a court or just to violate your human rights) can ask you to decrypt your PGPed disk. If you refuse, you can be held without charge forever. If you forget your key, you can be held for up to 5 years without charge. If they think you might in some way be connected to a terrorist organisation, or might commit some crime while on british soil, they can hold you on the Prevention of Terrorism Act for as long as they want, and they never have to report your detention to the public, or allow you to contact the outside world. Ever.

      Welcome to England. The most criticised country in Europe for human rights violations (but I'd vote for France and Greece in 1st and 2nd place).

      If they took the disk out of my laptop ... bye bye warranty.

      The guys claimed they are all certified dell/sony/compaq hardware technicians, and their damage^Wwork doesn't violate the warranty. Yeah, I believe that.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  17. Re:Prove functionality? by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    I'm guessing it's only carry-on stuff that's subject to these searches, so just don't carry it on. If they're huffy about the stuff being in checked baggage, just ship it overnight to yourself. It's not as expensive as you think.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  18. Transparent Digital Cameras by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    One bit of advice is, get a transparent digital camera - that is, one with a clear(ish) plastic housing so you can see the phone board through it. Just a glance at it and you can tell it's not a bomb. Might save you some hassle, though there is the drawback of it looking like a child's toy.

    Mine's just a little Earthstink cam though, not very good. Got it free with a membership my dad signed up for recently. =P I don't know if you can get NICE cameras transparent.

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
  19. Re:_Nice_ Transparent Digital Cameras?! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    > I don't know if you can get NICE cameras transparent.

    I'd say, by definition of 'nice', that would be NO. :)

  20. What's the functionality of a bomb? by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    They demanded that I prove the devices functionality.

    Ironically, if the device actually was a bomb, that pretty much amounts to them asking you to blow it up right there.

    (But don't point that out to them, unless you want to see exactly how humorless airport security is these days.)

    1. Re:What's the functionality of a bomb? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
      Ironically, if the device actually was a bomb,

      Would a laptop running XP count as one?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:What's the functionality of a bomb? by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it included strong encryption software, it could in fact be classified for export as "munitions".

    3. Re:What's the functionality of a bomb? by SilentChris · · Score: 2

      You mean Linux.

  21. Charging Batteries? by jelwell · · Score: 2

    "The current state of air travel security means more random searches and since I tend to travel with lots of electronic gadgets, these searches take a while and they test every device."

    This isn't even remotely new. Everytime I walk through the metal detector they ask me to turn on each device in my pocket, that means pda, cellphone, etc.

    Normally going through the xray is enough proof that the device isn't a bomb, but it doesn't surprise me in the least if they're asking you to turn on items in stowed luggage as well.

    Joseph Elwell.

  22. Re:Broken devices by BlueTurnip · · Score: 2

    Well, perhaps you're not checking luggage, especially if you're on a weekend trip.

    A couple of years ago I was on a weekend trip and had only one carry-on bag. While I was visiting my friend, my portable CD player broke and I had to carry back a broken one. I thought nothing of it, but I guess if it happened today and I was targetted for a search, I would be out a CD player, or possibly in jail indefinitely as a "potential material witness".

  23. Interesting advice...but... by dcigary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ....what happens when you don't use LapTop batteries? I carry around an old 200Mhz laptop simply for backing up pictures from my digital camera, and have long ago given up on trying to find the replacement batteries for it. Plus, it's lighter to carry around without those pesky batteries! Do they have plugs I can plug my Laptop adapter into at the search-n-frisk stations?

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  24. Er, not quite. by MichaelKVance · · Score: 3, Informative
    WineX - is actually a DirectX to Mesa translator
    Uh... not quite. Mesa is an implementation of the OpenGL API, and is only relevant to DirectX insofar as OpenGL is a competing API to Direct3D, a component of DirectX. What you probably meant was:
    WineX - which includes a reimplimentation of the DirectX API using *nix interfaces such as X11, OpenGL, and OSS.

    Get it right, then get it right again.

    m.

    --
    "Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
  25. EA releasing a Linux distro? Hahahahaha! by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2
    That really amuses me, simply because their flagship online content, ea.com, has always been very Linux-hostile. Try going to it with anything but Netscape >=4 && <6 or IE 4+, running on MacOS or Windows. Denied!

    This despite the fact that if you tell Opera to masquerade as IE, thus fooling the site into letting you past the front page, most of the stuff works fine except a) some JavaScript that isn't essential anyway and b) some blatantly non-compliant HTML (which I tried to get fixed on ADA grounds, a request which was never actually denied but simply fell into the memory hole and disappeared).

    I made a moderate-sized stink about this when I worked there and basically got told "Shut up, Linux is such a tiny fraction of the gamer market we don't give a shit."

    Lynx on my system declines to auto-redirect without user intervention, so the site is actually semi-usable with it...

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  26. install redhat inside dos partition by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

    This is what I did with my work laptop which has to run lotus notes- there's an option when you get to the partioning section of the install that lets you choose to install on top of the windows partition. Down side is you need a boot floppy and the red-hat system partition is limited to 2 gigs (which I gather is the max file size on a dos partition). But it works flawlessly on top of my windows 98 install on my work thinkpad. Also, the windows partition is automatically mounted as /initrd/loopfs so you can access all the files on the windows partition anyway.

    That's redhat 7.1, I am assuming the option still exists for 7.2.

    Brybuy

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  27. FMD and HDTV by Tom7 · · Score: 2


    First off, I'd like to say that this technology looks great; I hope they can deliver.

    All over their site I see propaganda about how current DVD technology could not deliver HDTV quality video. I don't think this is true. By using a better compression algorithm (ie, MPEG-4), it would seem to me that we'd get incredible quality at reasonable bitrates. We'd just need to upgrade the software standard and our DVD players/firmware (software on the computer); not develop new reading and manufacturing technology.

    So it seems that there is a software solution to this "problem" as well. Is this just their popaganda, or is there something I'm missing?

  28. Re:Prove functionality? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mainly, I do this because my time is limited and I have to unsolder components whenever I can. I'd love to use a 110V bulk unsolder gun, but in truth my 9V one works fine.
    Activities that produce lead vapors are not recommended for enclosed spaces like airplane cabins.
    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  29. One of the features of FMD: IP by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    From the features list for FMD:

    "Intellectual Property"

    "The FMD/C technology is presently protected by over 120 Japanese, European, and US patents, approved and/or pending, dozens of priority establishing disclosures, and the exceptional know-how of an unprecedented group of physicists cooperating across the world."

    Why is being proprietary a feature?

    1. Re:One of the features of FMD: IP by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      Why is being proprietary a feature?

      It isn't a feature for consumers, but it is a very important feature for potential investors. I've met with venture capitalists on two occassions and the first words out of their mouths were "Is your technology patented?"

  30. Laptops by istartedi · · Score: 2

    I've never understood that whole business of turning the thing on. How do they know the switch isn't connected to a presurized nerve gas cylinder or a wad of C-4?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  31. and in PERL . . . by Savage+Henry+Matisse · · Score: 2

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    #
    # pandt.pl- a lame joke that violates FAA regulations.
    #
    # all code original "Savage" Henry Matisse
    #
    # released to public domain April, 1998
    #
    # Penn and Teller made me do it!

    system "clear";
    print "READY\n";
    sleep 4;
    system "clear";

    print "ARMING\n";

    print "ARMING.\n";

    print "ARMING..\n";

    print "ARMING...\n";


    print "ARMED!\n";
    sleep 3;

    $seconds = "17";
    system "clear";
    {
    if ($seconds >= 0){
    print "ARMED!\n";
    print "00:00:$seconds UNTIL DETONATION\n";

    $seconds --;
    redo;
    }else{
    next;
    };
    };

    {
    if ($t =~ /1000/){
    next;
    }else{
    print " BOOM!!! ";
    $t++;
    redo;
    };
    };

    print "\n";

    sub sweep{
    sleep 1;
    system "clear";
    };

    --
    Much Love,
    "S"HM
    *****
    (I refuse to spellcheck out of contempt for your belief system)
  32. Transgaming copy protection by Webmonger · · Score: 2

    I want to like Transgaming wholeheartedly, but seeing that they're licensing CD copy protection from Macrovision makes me a little less enthusiastic. . .

    1. Re:Transgaming copy protection by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      I want to like Transgaming wholeheartedly, but seeing that they're licensing CD copy protection from Macrovision makes me a little less enthusiastic. . .

      Yeah, I noticed that too. But I wonder if they have made Wine good enough to run the no-CD cracks too... ;)]

  33. Do not do this with NiCd batteries by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Fully charged NiCD batteries have an occaisional possibility of catching fire. Discharged they are safe (OTOH, Alkaline batteries have exactly the opposite scenario). When I take my ham radio equipment on an airplane, I DISCHARGE them for safety reasons. I've actually had one explode on me, and it wasn't pretty. It had been off the charger for over 4 hours and was nice and cool. It wasn't even being used when all of a sudden it just went into meltdown mode and the battery case of the radio caught fire and let out some nasty fumes. This would have been a very serious incident had it been on an airplane. Later research confirmed the US military already knew about this and that it was related to the batteries being "topped off" and not used. Slightly older batteries with breakdowns in the rolled layers tended to have this problem.

    BTW, Alkaline batteries are at risk for this when they are mostly discharged and either shorted out, or attempted to be charged. They tend to be even more frightful when they go, because they can go boom. I've seen that happen before, too, although less dramatic than I've heard about.

    I have found that 2 minutes of charging can put in enough power to make the radio work briefly, and hopefully that is enough for the security guys to see that it is a real radio.

    Also, ham radio operators should be sure to carry their license with them. Obviously if you're taking radios, you're probably expecting to use them and you should have the license anyway. But it can help if the security people are wondering why you might have a radio transmitter or two.

    I do remember once when the xray operator asked me "what are all those metal balls?". My reply was "huh?". He invited me over to see the xray screen he had frozen even after my bag came through. I laughed. He got the radio batteries viewed on their ends. They showed up solidly black and round so he thought they were metal balls. I offered to show him the radios (I had 3 radios and 9 battery packs in there) but he just said to go on. Today that would worry me if he didn't insist on looking inside. I should have worried about it back then.

    Oh, and don't forget the chargers :-)

    73, KA9WGN

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  34. My TransGaming experience by Grond · · Score: 2

    I subscribed to the TransGaming service on the 22nd, the day it was released. I also submitted an article to slashdot about it, but got rejected :(

    Anyway, my experience has been overwhelmingly positive. The games that I have tested it with (Half-Life/Counter-strike, Baldur's Gate 1, and the Diablo II demo) have worked excellently with little or no configuration. I think Slashdot, as a major Linux news outlet, has done TransGaming a great disservice by not posting an article about it, but that's a rant I don't want to get into.

    As far as what you get for your $5/month (if you don't want to go it alone with the source code) are prepackaged binaries (rpms and debs) and the ability to post in the support forums. Speaking of the support forums, I found them tremendously helpful. Two small issues I had with Baldur's Gate were resolved within half an hour of each posting, once by other subscribers and once by the TransGaming staff. They are obviously very committed to making this a success.

    I really recommend that people give it a shot. If you don't have much money, give the source code version a shot. If it works (even partially) consider subscribing! $5/month isn't much (less than an hour's wages here in the States) and by subscribing you get better support and help to improve the program.

    By the way, even though the TransGaming website doesn't mention the Matrox G400 in their bit about devices that work well with WineX and the DRI, I can play Counter-strike on Linux as fast as on Windows, near as I can tell. My last barrier to wiping my Windows partition is finally lifted! :)

    1. Re:My TransGaming experience by Troed · · Score: 2
      I think Slashdot, as a major Linux news outlet, has done TransGaming a great disservice by not posting an article about it, but that's a rant I don't want to get into


      here

      ... which is a duplicate story of ...

      this


      I see why you don't want a rant, you'd lose ;)

  35. Zimmerman Telegram was WWI by crisco · · Score: 2
    The Zimmerman Telegram was WWI, sent in 1917.

    The Enigma Machine wasn't developed until the '30s.

    Interesting OT side note concerning the Zimmerman Telegram, some feel that it is tied into the historical British support for a Jewish homeland, leading to the formation of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. Valid or not, I don't know, but this is definately stuff I wasn't taught in school.

    --

    Bleh!

  36. Re:a newbie's opinion on RedHat 7.2 vs. Mandrake 8 by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

    First time I installed linux, it didn't support the bizarre-o serial ports on my Packard Hell 386 SUX-20, so I gave up on it (that was early 1993). Later, I got a copy on CD with a small manual in the sleeve ("How to Install X Without Calling the Fire Department") and we installed it on a friends 486DX 50 (not many of those were made). xroach was terrifice! I was so let down when I had a 486DX-2 100, because xroach ran too fast to be enjoyable. But at least I was hooked. This was about 1995. That's 2 quality years of linux I wasted because of crappy serial ports!

    -Paul Komarek

  37. My encounter with airport security (funny) by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

    As much as I've always DESPISED airport security as being a joke (my Father worked for the airlines, I've got lot's of stories) I did have one encounter that surprised me a great deal.

    Flying from the East coast to 'Vegas I had boarded the plane and was awaiting the gate push back. Suddenly they're announcing my name over the PA asking me to come up front. Puzzled I walked on up and was told that I had to go down to the jetway and open my bag. Puzzled I went back to my seat to recover the keys from my girlfriend and headed down the steps to the ground.

    Seems my bag was "vibrating" and they were a bit *concerned* by this. Sure enough, over the noise of the jets, I could feel some slight vibration. How the baggage handler had noticed this is beyond me but there it was - and I had NO idea what the heck was buzzing in there. I thought at first that it was my girlfriend's bag and that perhaps she had put something "extra" inside but the bag had MY tags not hers. I told the security guy point blank that I didn't know what was vibrating and he proceeded to list of a slew of things that "commonly" cause this problem! One of them is electric razors and sure enough I'd packed mine in there. Digging around in the bag I dug up my razor buried in the clothes buzzing away (sigh). No harm, no foul, apparently this occurs pretty often but I was shocked they noticed it. Made me feel a little better about security - until 9/11 that is :-(

    Embarrassed I climbed back up the stairs an announced to the plane's occupants who were staring at me that it was my girlfriend's bag not mine and just grinned. Problem solved, they pushed us back from the gate and we were on our way :-) Will be a long while before my office let's me forget the vibrating bag check...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:My encounter with airport security (funny) by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2

      "9 times out of 10 it's an electric razor. But the other time it's a dildo. Company policy is never to refer to it as 'your dildo', merely as 'a dildo'." - (probably misquoted from) Fight Club

  38. Re:They don't read it anyway by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

    How would you feel if you wrote a letter to your congressman and then found out that all the mail was burned because a single anthrax spore was found somewhere in the mail sorting complex? I'm pretty sure that the president is more important then someone from the congres. Even if the letter has little chance of being read and responded to it should not be burned before it even gets to it's destination. We elected Bush, our letters to him deserve at least a CHANCE to be heard.

  39. RH 7.2 retrospect.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    I went out and purchased the rretail box of RH 7.2.

    My observations? Why does it cost $59.95? I gagged when I saw the price. and then mentioned to the non-linux friend that the cost is for support... Oh which is non-existant now... No telephone support unless you buy the $199.00 professional version.

    So I was asked point blank from this non-linux friend what was the advantage of buying redhat linux , I started talking about how I was supporting a linux company and that you aren't tied to the EULA noose... well guess what, on the CD package you see .. " Opening this package signifies that you agree to the EULA that is available for reading on www.redhat.com"

    Redhat 7.2 creators ... I dont agree to your EULA, and I installed it anyways.. , this will be the last redhat product I purchase or install. There are several tennants that Linux stands for and are based on, One is not gouging your customers, the other is not forcing EULA's down our throats. My friend and I both feel that I was ripped off, (Mandrake cd is sitting next to REDhat on the shelf at $39.95, and turbolinux is there for $19.95) I try hard to support the linux companies, I have purchased every loki game released, and I purchase my redhat releases at a retail level.

    But not anymore, not for redhat.

    Move your pricing for the retail box to a sane level, and restore telephone support.. (web support... how to I access support if I can't access the net because my redhat install bombed?)

    I used to be highly impressed with redhat and I reccomended it at every turn, Now I have to find another distribution to reccomend to newbies instead of redhat.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:RH 7.2 retrospect.... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

      Here...Here. Well said, mod this guy up. The following line (he typed) is a classic: "(web support... how to I access support if I can't access the net because my redhat install bombed?)"

      I would love an "Ask Slashdot" on what distribution off the shelf provides the most value and highest level of support.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    2. Re:RH 7.2 retrospect.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Very true, but people shell out the money for Redhat in assumption that they are going to get tech support. Paying 60 bucks and then finding out you dont get phone support after opening the box is not cool... it should at least have a big sticker proclaiming "New! now without telephone support!"

      The ONLY reason to buy the retail box and not download it is the tech support. and now that reason is now history. (My reason was to support the company)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  40. Only some Enigmen are rare by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    Remember, the Germans made hundreds and hundreds of these. Only some of them are rare. The price is determined by an assessor. More properly called a guessessor, he applies his experience to determine a price.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  41. Figures... Rejected... by ender- · · Score: 2

    * 2001-10-22 19:02:02 Transgaming Interview (articles,games) (rejected)

  42. Re:Funny you should mention washing hands... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > For a real bit of fun try setting up a screen saver that "counts down" when the machine is powered up.

    Yeah, I've gotta change my "Danger / Self-Destruct System Activated" BIOS boot-logo. Looks great when plugged into a projector or big-screen TV and I'm about to start DJing with a pile of MP3z on the hard drive. Probably looks less-than-great if I have to power up at an airport.

  43. and toddlers, too. by hawk · · Score: 2
    Several years ago, probably about '93, a very concerned and agitated airport security agent demanded, "sir, what's in that box."
    "Huh"
    "Your box. Over there."
    Sitting atop the conveyor system, one of the copy-paper boxes we'd packed stuff in was jumping up and down. I thought for a moment, and started laughing.
    We'd bought my toddler a bubmle-ball. The stupid things turn on by pushing the button in . . .


    hawk

  44. We used to use ^M for that by hawk · · Score: 2
    *sigh* THe average slashdot reader probably wasn't born yet when we were cdoing this . . .


    The mechanical consoles needed time to return the carriage to the left margian. As such, ^M frequently had a delay built into the drivers. This frequently carried over to vt's.


    The DEC-20 mainframe (upgraded to a staggering half a meg of memory my senior year [but that was probably half a meg of 36 bit words]) went down, a lot, but usually managed to give a couple of minutes of warning.


    Among other things, we send a mail to a neurotic friend across the room, interrupting a sentence with


    [%DEC-SYSTEM 20 GOING DOWN IN 10 SECONDS%]


    followed by several timing slugs and then
    [%DEC-SYSTEM 20 DOWN%]


    You could also use the slugs for asci animation on a single line.


    hawk

  45. Re:Broken devices by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
    A couple of years ago I was on a weekend trip and had only one carry-on bag. While I was visiting my friend, my portable CD player broke and I had to carry back a broken one. I thought nothing of it, but I guess if it happened today...

    If it happened today, you would put it in your checked suitcase; today (depending on the airline and airport) you probably cannot have a carry-on bag. Used to be women could have both a carry-on and a purse; now the carry-on must be checked and the purse must be tiny and mostly empty. Men are allowed a wallet and comb and that's about it.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.