Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Bug Week

Gerv writes: "Do you run Mozilla? Is there something about Mozilla that bugs you? Do you have an itch you want to scratch? From Saturday October 27th to Sunday November 4th, mozilla.org will be running a "Bug Week". Experienced Mozilla hackers will be available to help anyone who wants to get involved with the Mozilla code. Engineers from companies using Mozilla or Mozilla technologies, interested onlookers, and those who are involved with the project, but have never hacked on the code, are all welcome to come along and get their feet wet."

Gerv continues:

"You'll be shown round our world-class web-based tools (Bugzilla, Bonsai, Tinderbox, LXR), and led through all the steps between discovering a problem and having your patch checked in to the Mozilla source tree. After checkin, those fixes and features will be appreciated by an audience of millions in Mozilla derivative products.

Not Just For Hardcore Hackers

"Mozilla's user interface is written in web technologies - defined in XUL (XML-based User-interface Language), animated with JavaScript and styled with Cascading Style Sheets. This means it can be understood, and hacked on, by anyone who understands HTML/XML, JS and Style Sheets. mozilla.org has recently developed technology to allow fixes to be made to Mozilla's UI without the need to compile Mozilla - all you need is a self-installing nightly build. This widens the field of potential contributors to everyone who's ever made a decent web page.

"So, if you have thought about getting involved in a free software project, but it all seemed to complicated or difficult, here's your chance.

"On the other hand, if you want to check the entire source tree out from CVS, compile the embedding test harness, and go into deep hack mode on Mozilla's C++ core, we'll help you do that too.

"Bug Week will be happening on IRC. Mozilla's nightly builds even include a chat client, ChatZilla, to make it even easier to participate. Look for people whose nicks begin with "BW_". We hope to have people there most of the time, although the help may be concentrated when the US West Coast or Europe is awake."

146 comments

  1. Bugzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rather than just ranting and raving about your pet peeve, you should rant, rave AND enter it into Bugzilla (after ascertaining that it isn't already in there).

    Subnote: Don't directly link to individual bugs in slashdot comments. It causes spam when people add ME TOOs as comments.

    (Hey, mod this anonymous bugzilla pointer post up, not the various karma whores to follow.)

    1. Re:Bugzilla by Karmageddon · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm glad that you brought that up.

      Bugzilla is way too involved for public use. If I'm going to stick a toe in the water, I want my first interaction to be very simple, and rewarding. And [hint] everybody feels this way about new things.

      1. Bugzilla has a million fields to fill out. Wanna know why the major search engines are so popular? one text box to fill, press Submit and voila, you might have your answer right there. Wanna know why email is so popular: To, Subject, Body, and then From defaults itself. And half the time, I can't even think of a Subject. Bugzilla needs to be this easy, or I and thousands of others will not use it [don't blame the messenger]. I don't know if my thought is already in the database, so I'll be damned if I'm going to fill out forms all day.

        And if something does seem important enough for me to put in, I recall being asked a bunch of precious little questions where I was supposed to qualify, characterize, topicalize, and quantify on scales that seemed entirely random. At least, they should put in a "cowboyneal" choice.

    2. Re:Bugzilla by grahams · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bugzilla is way too involved for public use. If I'm going to stick a toe in the water, I want my first interaction to be very simple, and rewarding.

      You should use the Bugzilla Helper, which still has a few fields (many less than the main bug entry page), but they are mostly necessary for a bug tracking package... You would never get it down to one field. :)

      This helper form simplifies the bug submission process and describes every field fully. You may complain that that there are still too many fields on this form, but I would argue that they are all pretty necessary for a good bug report.

    3. Re:Bugzilla by Tsk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rather than just ranting and raving about your pet peeve, you should rant, rave AND enter it into Bugzilla [mozilla.org] (after ascertaining that it isn't already in there).

      That's exactly (i think) why mozilla.org is hosting such event. If you read the weekly mozilla status, you'll often read that what mozilla.org's dev tend to do most is triaging their bugs in bugzilla, once bug are targeted and assigned they can start working on finding an norrowing the bugs and coding the fixes. For most of these steps you'll find information on mozilla.org's web site. You'll evne be able to run bugathon, help qa etc ....
      Some people just help eliminate bug duplicates but that's not enough, they still need the work force to creat patches and fixes. I've downloaded the source code once or twice, I've tried hard with the limited time I can devote to such project (I have a work, and ssocial life), I was disapointed, becaause I could not get fast enough in the internals of the code.

      Such events can help people like myself without much time to dig into it and bust bugs out of the product. OTOH Universtity started and now most CS clases are starting many students will have some time to work on the project in the forthcomin year, with a little help in the bigenning this will (I'm pretty sure) widen the number of mozilla developers that are not from the AOL/Netscape Alliance. Also many school project can with such be launched, that will focuse maybe on a module of mozilla, but such project are really good for the quality of the code, I hope some cs teachers will see the oportunity to base some of the projects they'll lead focused around the mozilla project.

      --
      none Yet.
    4. Re:Bugzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I would argue that they are all pretty necessary for a good bug report.


      wrong attitude... no, I'm not trying to be provocative or a jerk, I'm serious: bad attitude. If you want help on a project, you don't create obstacles by arguing for how you think things should be done. "The customer is always right" means "the customer is *always* right" because the customer is telling you what they think of the good or service. If they don't like it (too many freakin' fields, dude) then they don't like it. And all arguments to the contrary, no matter how valid, don't matter, because the customer is out the door.

      you need to think creatively, which since you probably won't, allow me to get you started: provide a really simple one-field form, submit, and then say "thanks" and ask more questions. draw the user in as much as they want to be drawn. really cool would be if the bug submission did a fuzzy search and said, this bug looks like these... are they the same? Make the bug database be a discussion forum so discussions can be elevated to bugs, bugs can be modified or resolved by other users, etc.

      Now, I might consider filling in the form mozilla's got and leaving the fields I don't want to fill in blank, but it probably doesn't allow it and I would get too annoyed if I put in work and it would not accept it. But disallowing blank fields (I'm assuming it does) means that I'd have to write stuff like, problem: "it blue screens"
      and what should it have done? "it should not blue screen" and having to write stuff like that can be equally irritating.

      plus, I have suggested features before and been told that they were really good (they really were good, stuff like I want to be able to turn cookies and javascript on and off right from the page as I'm looking at it, I don't want it to be some deeply nested global setting or config database... and many more suggestions) and none of my suggestions ever made it in. Implement them myself? perhaps, but I'm a smart guy and if other people don't see the wisdom of my suggestions then there's a too strong a likelihood that my changes would make it in anyway, so I don't want to waste my time. I could contribute a lot, but my interactions so far give me the heeby jeebies.

    5. Re:Bugzilla by Gerv · · Score: 2

      We get 300 bug reports a day, half of which are resolved as duplicates within a week. The bug filing process is not going to be made easier :-)

      Having said that,

      really cool would be if the bug submission did a fuzzy search and said, this bug looks like these

      This, and other stuff you mention, would indeed be very cool - problem is, we have no-one to write it. Are you volunteering?

      none of my suggestions ever made it in.

      The suggestions you mention work very well as an XPI-installable toolbar, and indeed a bunch of people have gone off and written a prefs toolbar (although I don't recall the URL offhand.)

      I don't want to waste my time.

      If you get buy-in on your changes before you start, and then produce a patch, you won't be wasting your time.

      Gerv

    6. Re:Bugzilla by ibbey · · Score: 2

      But, the customer is NOT always right. Making the bug submission process easier is great. Dumbing it down to far, however, will simply lower the signal to noise ratio. While your suggestions on how to fix the problem are sound, it sounds to me like it may be a problem that doesn't really need fixing.

      Remember, the more time spent fixing Bugzilla, the less time spent fixing Mozilla. Once they get to 1.0, then maybe it's time to start reworking the support tools.

    7. Re:Bugzilla by briandonovan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't downloaded it yet (I wasn't even aware that it existed until you mentioned it), but I found a download for a prefs toolbar at xulplanet. While I was looking for it, I also stumbled across David Illsley's useragent toolbar, which is pretty neat-o (and useful if you're tired of getting redirected by sites because you're using Moz or simply *not* using MSIE). Thanks for the hint about the prefs toolbar. Otherwise I'd have never found it.

  2. Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to use Mozilla, but anyone ever try running it at 1600x1200 resolution?

    IE at least allows consistent font sizes amongst various web pages...

    1. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows wiennee...

    2. Re:Fonts by BorgDrone · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I run it at 1600x1200, no problems whatsoever.

      what exactly is your problem ?

    3. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does not consistent font sizes amongst various web pages...

      RTFM

    4. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does not consistent font sizes amongst various web pages...

      That's a font problem, not a Mozilla problem. The shitty fonts on most Linux boxen are to blame. Pages look fine for me at 1600x1024 once I swallowed my pride and installed the free Windoze fonts.

    5. Re:Fonts by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      Where do you find these?

    6. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen asshole, if you got a problem with the fucking fonts then just use Internet Explorer you fucking faggot. The mozilla developers are geniuses of staggering intellect who work sometimes 20 hours a day on this wonderful project and then give it way, so if you have a problem with the fonts rendering in such a way that they are unreadable, well fucking deal with it you little whining slut, and if you can't handle it, then just go use Internet Explorer you fucking lame prick.

    7. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a debian package in non-free, called something similar to "microsoft-fonts", if that would help you out. It retreives them from deep in the Microsoft FTP servers.

    8. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot FUD.

      http://www.microsoft.com/typography/default.asp

      Isn't that difficult, now is it?

    9. Re:Fonts by Constellation · · Score: 1

      in debian GNU/Linux the package is named msttcorefonts

    10. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check a tutorial at : http://home.c2i.net/dark/linux.html#ttf

      I run mozilla with Verdana as default font, and finally no more display problem. Now I can't wait when gtkxft will work with mozilla.

  3. Get their feet wet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or drown in the fettid swamp that is Mozilla.

  4. IRC protofol link by Rayban · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is one of the great things about Moz. irc:// links are superhandy for redirecting someone to a chat room with a single click. :)

    --
    æeee!
    1. Re:IRC protofol link by The+Grey+Eminence · · Score: 1

      Talk about it. I had never seen such a link before and was gladly surprised (I've got Moz 9.5) of its effect. BTW, my first post at /. - um, hello everybody, or something.

  5. Wonderful - Mozilla is so intimidating by agutier · · Score: 1

    I made an effort to comment of XSLT functionality with multiple newsgroup posts, but got no response. These days, I may have the time to hack Mozilla.

    A very good idea of theirs to have an open house.

  6. I'm down! by imrdkl · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I've been looking for a good excuse to take the dinosaur out for a walk. Patches may not be forthcoming, but maybe I can get a Windows build working, anyways.

    Sounds like fun, fun, fun!

  7. On a daily basis, without any "font size" problems by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    On both Linux at home and Windows at work. Of course if you could give a slightly better description of the 'problem' you are seeing people may be able to give you some suggestions....

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  8. Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else sick of hearing about this never ending project?

  9. mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla is an embarrasment to open source...

  10. This should be obvious but ... by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    shouldn't the mozilla bugs be discussed in the Moz chat area, etc.? (noting some of the earlier comments)

    yaking about them here on Slashdot is not going to help get them fixed any faster. At least go to the right forum, or write up the bug.

    it is very easy to chew the fat about a problem, and then not do anything to fix the issue. Which seems to be par for the course.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one am getting damn sick of Gerv using /. as a Mozilla soapbox. Why doe she fail to understand that most /.ers don't care about mozilla and will not use it. We are all just hoping something better comes along fairly quickly.

    2. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, given that 90% of the /. readership these days seems to be made of MS weenies who think Visual Basic "programmers" actually deserve to be paid...

    3. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla is a fucking load of shit. I just want a browser not a suite of half broken beta apps. Produce one thing that actually works first, before you start all these other cheesy projects.

    4. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Gerv · · Score: 2



      I'm not the one with my fingers on the Publish button. The Mozilla stuff has been a bit heavy recently - but it's because we are doing lots of cool things :-)

      Gerv

    5. Re:This should be obvious but ... by MattyT · · Score: 2

      If you don't like the Slashdot editorial decisions, don't read it.

      Unlike you, most Slashdotters care.

    6. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, some jesus freak who barely knows html is working on mozilla, if this is the caliber of developer working on the project i think it's obvious why mozilla will forever be a beta project not stable enough for even a 1.0 release.

    7. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      if you don't like the Slashdot editorial decisions, don't read it. Unlike you, most Slashdotters care.

      I liked the article, it was good to know stuff.

      I was just annoyed that there were a few comments that started to go off on a rant on a specific bug, which I felt would be more useful posted over in the Mozilla zone.

      that's all. And yes, I've entered bugs that did not seem to be documented.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    8. Re:This should be obvious but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking with certain people on irc.mozilla.org and see how clueless, non free speech people they are can make you hate whole Mozilla project.

      IMHO anyway.

  11. Re:where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yup, I laugh at the mozilla coders a lot in #mozilla on irc.mozilla.org. These guys really have no clue about how to build quality applications.


    All the talented programmers are busy working on projects that have a future, mozilla gets the dregs that remain.

  12. Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by pivo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's one major problem with Mozilla's email component, something that that will probably keep me from using Mozilla all together, specifically the lack of a spelling checker.

    I really like the mail reader, it's got all the features that I've been looking for (multiple 'from' options, mixing pop and IMAP accounts for example) but the lack of a spelling checker is really a problem for me.

    1. Re:Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by SCHecklerX · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Try this

      Individual apps don't NEED a friggin' spell checker. They should hook into the stuff already on your system. That said, the solution in the link above allows you to simply hilight the stuff you want to check and checks it (if your windowmanager is smart enough to give you the ability to see what is in your X selection)

    2. Re:Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, if you think you can do better write your own fucking browser ok asshole, the mozilla developers work so hard on this and what do they get in return a bunch of bitching from ingrates. Internet Explorer has spell checker why don't you just fucking use that since i'm sure you're using windows, you are way to fucking pathetic and stupid to use linux.

    3. Re:Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Netscape 6.1, and any further releases by the mother-corp. I'm pretty sure that they include a spellchecker component which they are not free to open the source of. (So don't they just include it as a separate, downloadable plugin?)

    4. Re:Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by hwaara · · Score: 1

      The main reason for the lack of spellchecking is Mozilla is not the codebase, in fact, we already have support for spellchecking. The problem is that we've been unable to find one that is compatible with out license so we can check it into the CVS tree.

      See the netscape.public.mozilla.mail-news newsgroup for more info, since this is almost a FAQ by now.

      --
      -Håkan
    5. Re:Major Roadblock to using Mozilla by ArtDent · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      For those who don't use WindowMaker, does anyone know if it possible to include the X selection in the command of a GNOME launcher? How?

  13. Re:where by h00pla · · Score: 1

    Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and volunteer to help them, dude, instead of criticising.

    --
    I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
  14. Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    Damn it bugs me that the home buttonis on the personal toolbar. put it back on the damn button bar where it belongs. It's been there on every bloody browser since I first downloaded that first version of the ncsa mosaic browser oh so many bloody years ago.

    I want to look up and see a little picture of a fucking house and click on it and end up at my homepage.

    Otherwise it is a great browser.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Dude... I think it's time to check your blood pressure...

      Seriously though, that bugs me too, but remember, Mozilla uses skins. All you have to do is hack the skin and you (should) be able to put the button back where it belongs. I haven't really had a chance to look into it, so ymmv.

    2. Re:Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by efgbr · · Score: 1

      It makes no sense to have a bookmark item together with your navigation buttons.

      That said, you can enable the "Home" button in the Preferences dialog.

    3. Re:Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by speederaser · · Score: 1
      That said, you can enable the "Home" button in the Preferences dialog.

      That only enables the Home button on the Personal Toolbar. The Home button mrfiddlehead is talking about would be (missing) on the main Navigation Toolbar.

      I'm with mrfiddlehead on this, there should be a Home button on the main Navigation Toolbar. I really detest that Personal Toolbar and want to turn it off, but I can't because the dang Home button is there.

      I also can't seem to find a way to display the navigation icons without the words as in Netscape 4.x. I've been using Netscape forever and I don't need reminding what the buttons do. I would rather reclaim that real estate for viewing content.

      (/rant)

    4. Re:Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 1

      Really, how often do you need to press the "home" button? I think it's fine where it is - I don't want it polluting the rest of the toolbar with its un-usefulness.

    5. Re:Put the frickin' Home button back on the ... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      Browser designers seem to love crapping on the screen with oodles of menubars at top, statusbars at bottom and sidebars on the side. I don't want a gazillion menus, I want to surf the web dammit. I'd like to see a fullscreen mode, please. Secondly, in order to see the current URL, I need to have 2 menus. I.e. the main and the navigation menu. I'd love to see it folded into a one-line main menu like so...

      File Edit View Bookmarks Help | http://slashdot.org

      All on one line. And please scrap the crap with the honking big "M" icon so the bar doesn't have to be so thick.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  15. Re:where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shea right, there's no way i'd be associated with that laughing stock.

  16. Great News but ... by Tsk · · Score: 1

    To be a lot more effective such announce should be spread a little bit more.

    Mozilla will be the browser for many alternative OSes (read OS/2, BeOS, Linux, Qnx, Aix ....). Some of these OS already back up the mozilla project , and donate engeeniring forces to the project thats good but for other OSes, distro etc it's not the case So i sugest this announce to be publihed on sites like :

    advogato

    Beunited

    QnxStart

    I don't know any windows related sites, but adnantech should do it.

    This announce should also be mailed on developing mailing lists like apple's darwin developement list
    .

    Anyway a lot of great doc are available here and are good sartup point. Sometimes ago some video detailling how to dig in the code where available on mozilla's web site (but I can't find them right now).

    --
    none Yet.
    1. Re:Great News but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows how much you know.

      Beos is dead. It ain't gonna need a browser. And the mozilla port is awful and unusable

      Thr QNX port is also aawful and unusable-don't even think it builds.

      Not sure about the OS/2 port. I get tired of mozilla advocates teling me that mozilla runs on a bunch of platforms, when in actuality most of the 'ports' won't even run.

    2. Re:Great News but ... by Tsk · · Score: 1

      Beos is dead

      True, And I don't run it since they've droped the PPC platform.

      Thr QNX port is also aawful and unusable-don't even think it builds
      hence they need qnx developers to acquire the internals of mozilla to make the port build, squash qnx specific bugs ...

      I get tired of mozilla advocates teling me that mozilla runs

      I run Mozilla on MacOS 9.x, MacOS X, Solaris 8 (sparc), And use it has my mailer and primary browser. I ran mozilla on BeOS and Linux too, don't do it anymore.
      Thanks for making my point, mozilla needs developers mostly on platforms where noone or near to none work on , in the netscape teams.

      --
      none Yet.
  17. Re:mozilla - A Success! by maeglin · · Score: 1

    Mozilla is an embarrasment to open source...

    The only time an Open Source project fails is when people can no longer find the source.

    Mozilla itself could be abandoned tomorrow and it'd still be a success.. one merely needs to look at the Mozilla projects page to see the vast quantity of spin-off projects that Mozilla started. Not only are there the well known ones such as Gecko and Bugzilla but there are many, many others like two JavaScript interpreters (one in C++, one in Java), the Netscape Portable Runtime and XPCOM. There's even a commercial product (Komodo)!

  18. Personal CSS by lvv · · Score: 1

    Why I can not specify personal CSS in Mozilla GUI setup? Yes I know that it is possible in some config text file to specify JS like command. But I will need to run Google, or dig in far conner of Mozilla.org. I will probably just run Opera. Ideally it should be enabled / dissabled with some hot key. Personal CSS is a good thing. Consistent fonts, colors and even one more way to disable ADs.

    Also I wish Mozilla would be more keyboard friendly which makes working on laptop much more pleasant. Even better - with configurable keys.

    1. Re:Personal CSS by 10sball · · Score: 1

      They are actively working on it - I've seen a bunch of activity over the last few days in bugzilla. Look up bug #107023 as a startingpoint.

      --
      [place .sig here]
    2. Re:Personal CSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mozilla developera are not important, they are children playing with their new toy. They seem disinterested in making a useful application.

    3. Re:Personal CSS by Gerv · · Score: 2

      Why I can not specify personal CSS in Mozilla GUI setup?

      There's no UI for it yet, but just put a file called userChrome.css (for modifying the UI) or userContent.css (for web content) in your chrome directory. You may need !important on the rules.

      See mozilla.org for more docs and info.

      Gerv

    4. Re:Personal CSS by lvv · · Score: 1

      That exactly what I didn't liked. Yes, it is possible to to use Personal CSS in Mozilla, but I have to remember fixed, specific to Moz path and name for CSS file. I am using the same Personal CSS file in three different browsers. So if every browser behaved like Moz, I should have tree copy of CSS file or make symbolic link mess in my home dir. If file can be shared with other apps, it's name should not be fixed.

      I am myself prefer VIM/CL/Text conf files environment. But GUI app should be configurable from GUI. Mix GUI with CL/text configs is bad thing.

      Otherwise congrats to Moz teem for a good work!

  19. isn't this every week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't every week Mozilla bug week? :)

    1. Re:isn't this every week? by Glytch · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Goddammit, you beat me to it. :)

  20. Re:Post the ninth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't fuck them. That's disgusting! Kill them instead, and then feed their bodies to pigs!

  21. Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Chemisor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you habitually misspell words in your e-mail
    messages, the problem is likely to lie with your
    education rather than the software. Inclusion of
    software crutches for a wetware problem only
    makes the latter worse.

    1. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by pivo · · Score: 1

      You're right of course. I've quit my job and enrolled in 3rd grade, where I expect I'll meet you.

    2. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      Actually the problem is with English. Many (perhaps most?) languages are actually spelled the way they sound. Even loan works are transformed so they match the local spelling rules.

      Spending valuable time memorizing thousands of bizarre English spellings might help you to impress people, but that's time that could have been spent learning something useful.

      As far as I'm concerned, trying to improve my spelling in the age of spellcheckers is about as useful as trying to improve my handwriting in the age of word-processers. It's a nice hobby if you enjoy it, but it's not a life skill.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    3. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's all great and true. But, imagine for a second, that you get stranded on a deserted island, with your very bad spelling habits. Planes fly over occasionally, but you have no way to signal them. You decide that it may be a good idea to spell 'help' out on the beach. But, since you don't know how to spell for crap (hypothetically, of course), you instead spell 'hello'. So, the planes pilots' think you are a really friendly chap, instead of recognizing that you need help to get off the deserted island with its' one psalm tree, and cocunut headed inhabitant.

    4. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by tim_maroney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you habitually misspell words in your e-mail messages, the problem is likely to lie with your education rather than the software. Inclusion of software crutches for a wetware problem only makes the latter worse.

      Utter nonsense. Typographical errors are a fact of life, especially for those of us with some degree of wrist problem. I was third in my state in the national spelling bee in the eighth grade and yet I thank the gods daily for the passive spelling checker in Outlook Express, which saves me from the errors of my aging eyes and hands. I only wish Explorer had the same capability in text areas.

      Yours is more of the "blame the user" philosophy that is endemic to the UNIX world. Errors happen. Humans are fallible. Software should try to prevent them and help you correct them, not laugh at you for making them.

      Tim

    5. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Khalid · · Score: 2

      >Actually the problem is with English. Many
      >(perhaps most?) languages are actually spelled
      >the way they sound. Even loan works are
      >transformed so they match the local spelling
      >rules.

      Well this is probably completely off topic, but couldn't resist.

      Obviously you didn't learn French at school :)

      When I began learning English I was delighted to see how words are actually, mostly spelled as they are. In French (and I guess in many other languages) you have so much exceptions, due to mainly to historic reasons. One of the most famous is for instance "De Broglie" which is the name of a famous quanta theory scientist actually the father of the theory is pronounced "Debreuil", and this is the "only" name in French which follow this particular rule ! go figure :) there is even a joke for that. There are many words like that !! and many many exceptions, and most French people are delighted by this complexity.

      In fact, I think that English is one of the most pragmatic language, a lot of thing have been simplified, and this really a good thing. French people have vehemently refused a spelling reform (proposed by a minister of the government !!! )

    6. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      When I began learning English I was delighted to see how words are actually, mostly spelled as they are. In French (and I guess in many other languages) you have so much exceptions, due to mainly to historic reasons.

      Actually, French is probably the only Western language with *worse* spelling problems than English. Most languages like Spanish, Italian, or German have far more regular spelling than either English or French.

    7. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I learned French at school (to a reasonably high level) and I didn't find its spelling to be a problem. It took about two minutes to learn that the -ent ending in prennent (for example) is not pronounced, and it hasn't been a problem since. You learn pronunciation by listening to native speakers, not by any other system and certainly not from reading. I didn't find the various unpronounced consonants to be a hindrance when learning or writing the language; in fact they were helpful because they show the *meaning* (often indicating similarities with English).

      I've also learnt German and Italian and I have to say that the phonetic spelling you are keen on was not really a big deal. It didn't make much difference to the ease of learning to read, speak and write those languages.

      Most days I read and write a lot more than I speak or listen. So there's no reason to think that pronunciation should be primary and everything else should follow from that. OTOH, if you were starting from scratch developing an alphabet for a previously not-written language then phonetic encoding is the simplest way to start.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Educated people don't need spelling checkers. by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      French is kind of funny, in that, in general, you can figure out the pronounciation from the spelling, but there's absolutely no hope of going the other way. There are _tons_ of silent letters, but the rules are followed well enough that you can usually figure out which letters aren't pronounced. (Of course there are exceptions like the ones you point out.)

      At the other extreme from English and French is Finnish. It's spelled exactly the way it sounds, right down to long and short consonents. It's pretty neat. In English the difference between "balled" and "baled" is in the vowel, in Finnish the vowels wouldn't change, but the length of the consonent would be different.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  22. WTF? by petard · · Score: 2

    What are you complaining about? The only projects that end, typically, are failed projects. In order for stuff to continue to improve, it can't end. Are you also sick of hearing about the never-ending project that is windows (which just had its 5.1 release, to great fanfare) this week? What about the never-ending RealPlayer project? Or the Mac OS project? Or the WinAmp project? Or ...? If you don't like hearing about them, here's a suggestion:
    Stop reading sites that print news about software!

    Jackass.

    Insightful: +1. Funny: +1. Flamebait: -1. Troll: -1. A good flame: priceless

    --
    .sig: file not found
    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those 'other' projects eventually came to a real release point. Mozilla keeps streching things out endlessly. And don't compare a damn browser project with an entire operating system dickhead.

  23. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by The+Evil+Beaver · · Score: 1

    Mozilla isn't all-american. People from various different countries work on Mozilla too... From South Africa to here in Canada. Identifying the lizard with the USA would more than likely alienate a good number of Mozilla hackers, and that would be a BAD THING.

    And communism isn't the only thing associated with the color red you know... What happened to raspberry jam, huh? :P

    --
    Chris 'coldacid' Charabaruk Meldstar Entertainment
  24. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netscape was an American company and guess what tonto...America Online is, now this may be shocking, an American compny, so i don't know what the fuck you're talking about...

    Ya a couple crusty eurotrash "coderz" contributed some bloat to the project, but let's be realistic, 90% of the developers are the crappy low skill AOL employees that got the unfortunate task of trying to make something useable out of the crusty old netscape code.

  25. My congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done.

    Good to see open source projects taking a pro-active approach to bugs. It's great that you can download a free, functional piece of software and if you find a bug they'll help you fix it.

    This is one of opensources strongest advantages and projects like this will only do to further this opensource cause.

    With the up and coming calender functionality going in I can see me rolling this out within my company. We did look at MS Exchange - but the costings compared to our current linux setup warranted a spend of some $150,000 (with ongoing costs) - the calender functionality would address the only shortcoming the present system has.

  26. Re:mozilla - A Success! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't say it failed, i said it was an embarrasment.

    George Bush didn't fail, in fact he is the president of America.

    Doesn't mean the guys not an embarrasment.

  27. slow by flok · · Score: 1

    Ehr, it's running kinda slow on my 32MB P90. What should I do?

    (Sorry, could not resist)

    --

    www.vanheusden.com - home of Multitail, HTTPing, CoffeeSaint, EntropyBroker, rsstail, bsod, listener, nagcon, nagi
    1. Re:slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you get some real hardware you little bitch. Don't blame mozilla engineers becuase you are to much of a fucking cheapskate to get some real hardware. Why don't you just stick to internet explorer so you don't hurt yourself ok. Mozilla runs fine on my 1.2ghz athlon with 256 megs of ram, i donno what your problem is. You probably have it configured wrong.

    2. Re:slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should hope it runs more than OK. Fact is I have a 1.8Ghz bok with 512MB ram and on windows 2000/Linux mozilla still feels slow and memory usage is ridiculous.

    3. Re:slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you're probably just stupid and configured it wrong. Why don't you just stick to Internet Explorer, you obviously can't handle a real man's browser.

    4. Re:slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hear you. Only choice is to get a real lean, mean, browsin' machine: Opera.

      It will do the trick when bloatware falls short.

    5. Re:slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a P2 450, it's very very sluggish.. for example, if I click on a menu, then move the mouse left and right over the other menus, it can't keep up and ends up drawing a big mess until it catches up again.. and in general, when clicking on anything, it takes about 1/2 a second to notice, making me think that it didn't 'hear' my click, so I do it again, and well..

      On the same machine, netscape 4.77 still wins hands down as the fastest browser I can find. IE is reasonable, but annoys me too much. NS crashes all the time, but at least it's fast when it works.

  28. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a Beowulf cluster?

  29. Re:mozilla - A Success! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of those spin off projects have produced usable applications? How many of the mozilla ports actually work?

  30. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ya a couple crusty eurotrash "coderz" contributed some bloat to the project, but let's be realistic, 90% of the developers are the crappy low skill AOL employees that got the unfortunate task of trying to make something useable out of the crusty old netscape code.

    Mozilla is not based on the ''crusty old netscape code''. They tried that. They didn't get very far. Mozilla is, afaik, a pretty much complete rewrite from scratch. One of many legitimate reasons it's taken so long to get to the very useable state it is in now.

    Mozilla is a very competent and capable browser. About the best available for non-Windows users and plenty of those like it too. It costs you nothing. It's totally open for anyone to do what they want with it. Why do so many people have a problem with this? If you don't like it, don't use it.

    It's taken a long time coming, sure, but so was Win2K. At least you've been able to use Mozilla all the time it's been developed. I jumped on board around 0.9 after trying out the earlier versions and not being overly impressed. It's now on all my machines and my users are very happy with it.

    --
    "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
  31. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raspberry and jam, hmmm ...

    "There's only _one_ man in the galaxy who would _dare_ giving me the raspberry - LONE STAR!"

    5 /. FUD points if you know from which movie that is.

    3rd assmaster

  32. My favorite bug! :) by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    The fact that you can not get the Flash plugin for Mozilla when running it on Windows 98. I am very happy to see that Mozilla works better at home on my Linux Mandrake 8.1 box than at work on this silly Win98 box that I am posting from right now! ;-)

    Just out of curiosity, how do you get the Netscape plugin for Flash to work for Mozilla? It appears to only need to be redirected to mozilla.exe from netscape.exe? Is that true, or do I need to lay off the crack pipe again?? ;-)

  33. I've got one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My feature request: Make it good. There are a myriad reasons why no one of consequence is switching from MSIE and this will not change until my request is implemented.

    You're welcome.

    1. Re:I've got one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please name someone of consequence. Bill Gates perhaps? GWB? How about bin Laden? Maybe you're someone of consequence? WTF does that mean?!

  34. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you don't like it, don't use it."

    Looks like 95% of computer users out there have taken your advice.

  35. Calendar by The+Evil+Beaver · · Score: 1

    See this /. article about the calendar. It's post-1.0 work, if you can, help us out with getting Mozilla to that milestone.

    --
    Chris 'coldacid' Charabaruk Meldstar Entertainment
  36. Every week by Mordant · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I run Mozilla is 'Mozilla Bug Week'.

  37. Re:My favorite bug! :) by vsync64 · · Score: 1
    The fact that you can not get the Flash plugin for Mozilla when running it on Windows 98.

    Yes you can. Just go to Macromedia's site, do the "get flash" thing, and select the Windows plugin for Netscape browsers. The installer will automatically detect Mozilla and install the plugin. You may need to restart Mozilla afterward, but then you are set.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  38. Re:My favorite bug! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried this too, and all I got was Netscape/Netscape Compatible, which I tried, but all it did was try to install with the afore mentioned .dll that looks for netscape.exe, not mozilla.exe.

  39. mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People still use mozilla? The great white hype of mozilla has finally passed i thought. Most people i know have moved on to konqueror or gone back to internet explorer. Years later and it's still in a beta state with tons of bugs and pointless bloat. I think Mozilla is gonna be one of those projects like the Hurd, nobody will just let it die, but it never really gets anywhere.

  40. Good idea by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is, essentially, a good idea.

    The biggest problem I have with Open Source software is that there is this myth that because something is open, anyone can fix bugs and contribute updates.

    Well yes they can. But the problem stems from the lead time required to get the know the project, how it works, what does what and how different functions interact with each other.

    Some examples. One of the companies I used to work for (a large IT consultancy company) I worked on a telemetry project. For every person who joined that project, there was a lead time of about three months for them to get used to, understand and know how the system works.

    Okay, so that was one massive project and with people working full time on it, but Mozilla and other open source projects aren't exactly small either.

    Another example. I wrote a GPL perl script called AvantSlash to take the content of Slashdot and process it for handhelds (since Slashdot's own isn't very good). Unfortunately due to a bug and an overdependence on AvantGo's caching, it accidenly spammed the slashdot site and got its IP barred. (This was in the 1.x thread, v2.0 doesn't suffer this problem).

    A comment by Jamie a couple of days ago mentioned why it was banned and suggested that I contribute to slashcode.

    Whilst this, in theory, is a great idea, as it would seem to be common with open source coders he unfortunately forgot that there would be several months of lead time whilst I learn how the code works, what does what and why and then, once I knew the system well, actually apply a well written patch.

    Don't get me wrong, I love open source and the stuff it produces and I have a lot of respect for anyone who spends their time doing such stuff.

    However, I'm just pointing out that there is a common myth amongst people in massive open source projects that people can just download, install and then immediately start dipping into the code and producing patches without having to go through the whole learning process.

    So, back to Mozilla. Anything which speeds up this lead time has got to be a good thing and will have the added advantage of getting more people interested in the whole project.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Good idea by tim_maroney · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem I have with Open Source software is that there is this myth that because something is open, anyone can fix bugs and contribute updates. Well yes they can. But the problem stems from the lead time required to get the know the project, how it works, what does what and how different functions interact with each other.

      You have an excellent point, and yes, startup time on Mozilla is considerable. There is a myth that in an all-open-source world, programmers would be freely dropping in to various programs to fix bugs as they came up. In fact, being able to effectively fix a bug in a large, complex software system requires a great deal of familiarity with that system in order to understand the possible consequences of the fix. Perhaps there is an internationalization standard which means your new dialog won't work for the users in Finland. Perhaps your code was checked in without understanding critical section synchronization locking and will cause the pre-emptive scheduler to crash once a week semi-randomly. Perhaps, as in Mozilla's case, the codebase is simply so vast and sprawling that you would have to practically live there to have a hope in hell of even finding the relevant code.

      I've tried to start up on Mozilla several times. The problem is that it takes over a day just to set it up to build on the Macintosh. By that time, I have other pressing priorities demanding my attention. If I am then able to come back to it a few days later, I have to first refresh myself on the arcane build procedure, then start poring through thousands of files and trying to understand the intricacies of XPCOM and XUL, both of which have incomplete, badly written, and out-of-date documentation. I have never succeeded in doing this. I think I would have to carve off two weeks solid to become reasonably fluent and be able to start contributing. Unfortunately, I have a job and a personal life.

      I had a similar experience when I thought an interesting project would be to find key performance issues in GCC and bring it closer to CodeWarrior performance. I searched for days to find a performance profiler for Linux that worked -- I was directed to a couple that seemed not to work, and somehow GCC itself doesn't seem to have one, unlike most commercial compilers. Looking into the GCC code itself, I realized it would take, once again, weeks of startup time to understand what was going on. I don't have weeks to spare, so I gave up. Sorry.

      It really seems that contributing to large open source projects is less like dropping in to help clean up a house, and more like joining a religion. Which program you will be part of is a lifestyle decision. This does not seem to be factored in to the common idylls of open source distributed bug fixing. Yes, I could probably fix a bug in fetchmail or the average perl module in a few hours from a standing start, but not in any of the more significant software systems.

      Tim

    2. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      binutils (which is effectively part of GCC) comes with gprof, which does a reasonable job of profiling single threaded apps. doesn't seem to like multithreading much though.

    3. Re:Good idea by kimihia · · Score: 1

      First, avoid blanket generalisations.

      I was missing a piece of documentation for mysql. I wanted to know what order configuration files were opened in. Knowing a little C I downloaded the source RPM, cracked it open, and spent quarter of an hour trawling around until I found the pertinent. Not long at all!

      Again, I had beef with a certain feature of PHP, and it only took me five minutes to find it and stomp it.

      I'll admit that to add features to PHP will take a while, as there are plenty of #defines that completely obscure the code going on behind the scenes. But to actually dive in and fix something doesn't have a large lead time.

      So I've removed a feature of PHP, but I have also submitted a couple of bug reports. Anyone can do that. If you can't submit the bug report, there is some J R Hacker out there who already groks the project, and they may be able to write the fix for you.

      So what's my point?

      • Find a problem (no, crashing is not acceptable, no matter what the vendor tells you)
      • Isolate the problem and reproduce it
      • If you don't know how to fix the problem, submit a bug report - move on with life, communicate with the developers if they ask for more information
      • If you can see how to fix the problem quickly, fix it, test it, and include with your bug report - move on with life
      • If you can kinda see how to fix it but haven't the time, then submit the bug report anyway

      I haven't written a dot of code for Mozilla or PHP (so I lie, I have written a file to add another search engine) but I have submitted bug reports.

  41. bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The bottom line is: mozilla sucks, always has, always will. End of story.

  42. great idea! by johnycanal · · Score: 1

    This is a great chance for people to discover how mozilla is more than a browser. More importantly, it looks like the mozilla folk are responding to their critics who are calling this an open source project that is, in reality, closed to all but a select group

    My only question is why isn't this info posted on mozilla.org? Wouldn't that be the logical place to put an announcement like this?

    --
    http://metamuscle.com - Better Bodies Through Hypertext
  43. Full Screen View! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mozilla is great!
    Most annoying bugs :
    • No Full Screen View (without top,bottom etc ala IE)
    • Doesn't always update images on reload (bug in image module?)
    • Flash on Linux can't all it)

    Current user of...
    Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012
    1. Re:Full Screen View! by skt · · Score: 2, Informative

      you can download a plugin to get a fullscreen view in mozilla. try multizilla.

    2. Re:Full Screen View! by Gerv · · Score: 2

      Multizilla's the tab thing, not full screen, isn't it?

      Full screen is currently being written, I think.

      Gerv

    3. Re:Full Screen View! by skt · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah, but in the mean time displaying a tab in fullscreen is probably close enough. There is a toolbar that comes with multizilla that allows for this. It acts just like the IE fullscreen view I would imagine (minus the tabs of course).

  44. Re:My favorite bug! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why on earth would you want to run Flash? So you can see huge ads fly across the screen?

  45. Re:mozilla - A Success! by maeglin · · Score: 1

    How many of those spin off projects have produced usable applications? How many of the mozilla ports actually work?

    I myself have used Galeon, Komodo, Bugzilla and Rhino (JavaScript in Java) without problems. Rhino has actually influenced the creation of other projects itself.

  46. Re:mozilla - A Success! by Gerv · · Score: 2

    Bugzilla is extremely successful. Galeon, K-Meleon, Skipstone, Activestate Komodo, the OS/2 Web Browser, Beonex... all these are successful Mozilla derivatives or spin-offs.

    All the ports build and work fine - check our Tinderbox if you want.

    Gerv

  47. Re:My favorite bug! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netscape is Mozilla. so, install Flash (you can have it just create a directorey somewhere and dump the plug-in file [NPSWF32.DLL] in there for you to deal with yourself). then, by hand, you copy NPSWF32.DLL into your \program files\mozilla.org\mozill\plugins directory (or wherever it is you keep Mozilla caged up) and it works (perhaps needing a reboot). nothing complicated

  48. Java: I'd settle for it just working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Explicit instructions for making Java work in the Win32 version as easily as it does in IE for applications like Hushmail and Host on Demand would enable me to dump IE totally. Until then, though, I have to keep IE around because its JVM just works.

    ~~~

    1. Re:Java: I'd settle for it just working by Gerv · · Score: 2

      Did you ever read the Release Notes? It's all in there. Where else would you like us to put it?

      Gerv

    2. Re:Java: I'd settle for it just working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have, and followed those instructions to the letter. However, attempting to run HushMail results in a "bad magic number," while IBM Host on Demand generates a SecurityException stating that the signatures on some of the classes don't match. If I've done something wrong, I'm all ears. Thanks.

      ~~~

    3. Re:Java: I'd settle for it just working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical open sores mentality quick on the draw with a smartass answer to a newbie but no solutions

      open sores elitism loses to the free market again

  49. I feel I should point out that..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gervase Markham is a Christian and has also been arse licking the mozilla devs to secure an internship.


    Gervase, or 'Gerv' seems to think that mozilla is the best web browser in existence, despite constanlty being told otherwise by experienced developers who insist it sucks goat balls.


    Gerv believe that the bible is an accurate historical account 'of an amazing series of events'. Furthermore, it is rumoured that Gerv refuses to worhsip at the 'Church of Emacs'.

  50. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by Gerv · · Score: 2

    Gervase Markham is a Christian

    Absolutely. But I'm not sure why you say it as if it's an insult.

    and has also been arse licking the mozilla devs to secure an internship.

    Definitely. I secured this job entirely through ass-kissing; I didn't do any work on the project before at all. In fact, I worked on Konqueror for a year and a half.

    mozilla is the best web browser in existence

    There's no such thing as the best web browser in existence - they all have different strengths and weaknesses. But Mozilla does rock :-)

    Gerv refuses to worhsip at the 'Church of Emacs'.

    Absolutely. I'm an nedit user, although I sometimes use vi for checkin comments because I'm too dumb to set CVS up to work with nedit by default.

    Gerv

  51. Re:My favorite bug! :) by vsync64 · · Score: 1

    Ah, my bad. I have only done this on machines without NS4 installed. I guess it looks for genuine Netscape first, and then falls back to Mozilla, instead of doing the sane thing, which is installing itself into all plugin directories on your system. Or even better, displaying a list of installed browsers and asking which to install into.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  52. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, don't give trolls the time of day. This one especially doesn't deserve it.

  53. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by Gerv · · Score: 2

    dude, don't give trolls the time of day. This one especially doesn't deserve it.

    Everyone's worth the time of day. :-)

    Gerv

  54. Hmmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making progress is a low priority. Who uses Netscape's webserver, anyway?

  55. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by sheol · · Score: 1
    Absolutely. I'm an nedit user, although I sometimes use vi for checkin comments because I'm too dumb to set CVS up to work with nedit by default.

    It's as simple as 'export EDITOR="(insert path to favorite editor here)"'

  56. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by leeward · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. I'm an nedit [nedit.org] user...

    Cool! My already high opinion of Gerv has increased significantly :-) Really, nedit is just so cool. I mostly use it to write VHDL code.

  57. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by kaooak · · Score: 1

    95% of the users don't know anything about software development and software quality and are stuck with Windows and even don't know that something else exists... Your argument is bad and you probably know it.

  58. Re:BUG: The red dinosaur by AndrewNelson · · Score: 1

    Duh, Spaceballs.

    "When will then be now?"
    "Soon!"

  59. This is why I love open source by Tarkwyn · · Score: 1

    'nuff said. Show me the IE bug week.

    --
    Tarkwyn.
  60. Re:I feel I should point out that..... by Gerv · · Score: 2

    Thanks very much :-)

    Gerv

  61. Re:My favorite bug! :) by Christopher+Whitt · · Score: 1

    When I first installed Mozilla I noticed that the Macromedia installer looks for Netscape.exe. It only does this after it has already installed the plugin itself, though. You can give the installer your Mozilla directory instead of Netscape, and the plug in will work fine. The installer might crash or ask for a reboot, but you can ingnore that once the NPSWF32.DLL file is in the Mozilla/Plugin directory.

    It only needs to know where Netscape.exe is to launch a browser and send you to the Macromedia website for some promotional junk.

    Once you've got a Mozilla installation working with Flash, just copy the plug-in directory to any future Mozilla installations. I haven't had to install any plugins since 0.8.3 or something.

  62. Is "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" a good bug report? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    "The customer is always right" means "the customer is *always* right" because the customer is telling you what they think of the good or service.

    Are you saying that if the customer thinks "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" is a good bug report, then "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" is a good bug report?

    provide a really simple one-field form, submit, and then say "thanks" and ask more questions.

    But if you already know exactly what questions you're going to ask, why not just ask them on the Bugzilla Helper?

    problem: "it blue screens" and what should it have done? "it should not blue screen"

    If Bugzilla Helper b*tches about empty fields, would you mind filling in "Steps to Reproduce" telling exactly how to make Mozilla bluescreen?

    Implement them myself? perhaps, but I'm a smart guy and if other people don't see the wisdom of my suggestions then there's a too strong a likelihood that my changes would make it in anyway, so I don't want to waste my time.

    Just make a chrome that has such a checkbox linked to a JS pref, and make a new bug with your diffs.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  63. Go look at the themes by yerricde · · Score: 1

    File Edit View Bookmarks Help | http://slashdot.org All on one line.

    Then write such a theme.

    And please scrap the crap with the honking big "M" icon so the bar doesn't have to be so thick.

    There already are several themes like this. Including them in the default install would make the download size too big for those who do not have the resources to move their families to areas that offer high-speed Internet access.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  64. Alert!: Unsupported URL scheme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    irc://irc.mozilla.org:6667/#bugweek


    "Alert!: Unsupported URL scheme!"


    Why should we surprised to see a non-standard url in a story about Mozilla?

  65. Why declare a special week ? by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Every week should be bug week, and not just for Mozilla. The fact is that if we want software to perform up to our expectations, we need to fix it, or at least explain our gripes to someone with the proper skills. Bugzilla is one such mechanism, but in a sense, every project on Sourceforge would greatly benefit from this kind of support.

    Sometimes just showing interest is enough to motivate a developer to pursue his efforts; just think about it: why spend all your time working on something that no one else will see ? Many open-source projects fall victim to underappreciation, and are quickly abandoned. They don't ask for money, so at least give them a few minutes of your time. It's really all it takes.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  66. Re:Is "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" a good bug report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    let me put some limits on the vocabulary, but not the idea: a "customer" is someone that you legitimately want as a "customer", i.e. you want something from them which you hope to get by giving them something they want. speaking somewhat loosely, in this case the "customers" are mozilla users and potential mozilla developers. So...

    Are you saying that if the customer thinks "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" is a good bug report, then "mozilla sux0rz; ie r00lz" is a good bug report?

    yes, if some of your legitimate potential customers think that is a good bug report, you will lose them as customers if you do not accomodate them. Listening to them is the only way to figure out what they see in/expect from your product. Information from customers is actually very hard to come by and it should never be ignored.

    Of course, you need to balance the value of their business against the cost of accomodating them. So far mozilla has failed with me. I think I would otherwise be a "good customer" and I think my perceptions match those of other potential customers, though I'm more analytical about it an more willing to take the time to post comments. If I don't represent a significant body of opinion, cool, I won't be customer and nobody needs to care.

  67. Um... by Millennium · · Score: 1

    And this matters... because... why? Honest question: how exactly do someone's religious beliefs affect in the least their ability to code?

  68. Re:mozilla - A Success! by Explo · · Score: 1

    I didn't say it failed, i said it was an embarrasment.


    And your evidence and exact arguments for this statement are..?

    --
    Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.