Slashdot Mirror
Light Emitting Pictures On Standard Inkjet Printer
CrashRide writes: "This story on FOX states that UofA scientists have discovered a way to print light-emitting pictures on thin sheets of plastic using a standard inkjet printer. Fold up pocket monitors?" The article says that these scientists have produced "OLEDs of simple bands of light, a scorpion, the University of Arizona logo and even photographs of themselves."
reading comic books under the sheets at night a lot easier :)
How Jaded Are You?
This is the Gilette model: "Give 'em razors, charge for blades!"
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
that pr0n can't benefit from?
It says "cheap".
Could industries like bookmakers or publishers use this sort of thing? I'm rather fond of the glowing text on the black background, if you ask me, and it would provide a great alternative to something like a reading light. of course, it'll probably jack the cost of books up. Even though they do claim it'll be "inexpensive".
However, I do think their assumption about 'computer monitors' is silly - right now, they're printing flat pictures, not moving, highly detailed ones.
...GLOW IN THE DARK PORN!!!
But seriously, what are some real world applications for things like this? I haven't seen one in real life, so I don't know how bright they are, but I don't think we're at pocket monitor level yet.
"The dog ate my homework."
"Why didn't you print out another copy?"
"It ate my monitor too..."
I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
This is just a poster that glows -- it's a static picture that glows using a low amount of electricity. Unless you're running Windows, and all you need to display is the same bsod, you'll need a more "dynamic" display :).
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
This is what was done with a multimillion dollar grant from the US Dept. of Defense. I think it's pretty cool, even though the technology itself is pretty old (the article mentioned it was 14 *years* old).
Basically all they do is put a solution onto plastic sheets that turns electrical energy into light. This is cool because in a few years we might see these special inkjet cartdiges appear on the consumer market. They would probably be in a kit including the cartridges with the special solution in them, and plastic paper to print on, some coating for the "paper", and a power supply to rig the whole thing up. You could make some pretty cool signs with this, yes indeed.
I think it would be cool to make halloween signs, amateur beer signs for your bachelor pad, or coat your car's inside roof with them, and instead of having a dome-light, the whole inside roof of your car lights up!
Cool stuff.
Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
This sounds all well and good, but what I don't understand is how they address the individual pixels. If I read this correctly, they are spraying the light emitting pixels onto the sheet. But how are they getting the power to each pixel? Are they spraying wires on as well?
Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
Does that mean the Mozilla team doesn't have to fix bug 2586, "Print Preview animates GIFs"? Here's the original bug report:
In Print Preview, animated GIFs are still animated. I would love to say
that it is not a bug, but unless the printing code can then back the
preview up by animating the printed copy, I suggest the Print Preview
should show a static image.
This also applies to applets, Javascript, "hover" and "active" pseudo
classes, and so on.
The shareholder is always right.
I first saw this on a Sunday afternoon techie program, think about text flying around, blinking or being added dynamically via a wireless lan connection to a page and you've got the idea of it's coolness (even though its only monochrome).
The thing I like about eInk the most is that its fairly high-res (well, it looks sharp to me) and that it does not require back-lighting, it reads like paper under natural light.
http://www.eink.com/
crazy dynamite monkey
on oragami.
There is a better story on the UA newspaper. And here is the link to research department. Not much here yet except for an animation.
For example, an editor might cut out stupid comments from a post, such as "Fold up pocket monitors?".
The same stupid comment is in the Fox article.
So it's not only stupid, it's plagiarism.
ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
This is just a poster that glows -- it's a static picture that glows using a low amount of electricity. Unless you're running Windows, and all you need to display is the same bsod, you'll need a more "dynamic" display :).
If you can print conducting traces, you could set up a grid pattern of traces around pixels that would let you selectively activate pixels, much as you do in a passive-matrix LED. At any given time, one horizontal line (say) would be ground, and the rest would be at Vdd. Vertical lines would be driven or not driven depending on whether you want pixels in the active line on or off. If these printed pixels really are OLEDs - diodes - then you won't have to worry about the other horizontal traces shorting across the vertical lines.
I'm sure there are a number of ways of printing conducting traces with ink. Even a high-resistance trace could be electroplated after printing with thicker metal.
The only question is whether a) the type of OLEDs printed with this technology are really diodes, passing current only in one direction, and 2) whether instantaneous current can be high enough to give an acceptable _average_ current (and brightness) per row over the whole scanning cycle. A row turned on one thousandth of the time needs to be a thousand times as bright when it's on.
Other methods of addressing pixels in a display are of course possible. This is just one of the easiest (not necessarily best).
Not trusting the headline whores at fox news, I did a little searching on google and found this article published in June of 2000. It has a better review of the actually technology from a pure science point of view, rather than the "marketing press release as if it were a product" garbage that was posted.
"Get them before they get....
Ultimately, the technology could lead to computer monitors that you fold up and put in your pocket like a handkerchief.
when you accidently blow your nose with it?
Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
does this mean that they can be wired back to back to create spray on transistors? Ultracheap custom chips
Spray on transistors are almost there. (The linked article mentions some spray on circuitry but the (fast) transistors are rubber-stamped, they're still working on spraying those). The folks described here are doing spray-on polymer transistors.
Hmm, couple the LEDs, the transistors and some good optical sensors and you can make yourself a cloak of invisibility...
-- Alastair
Print a page...
Move joystick...
Print a page...
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
This was done in June of 2000 by Epson-Sieko (yes the printer people) and CDT, a British company that researches OLEDs and similar crap.
Google brings up some resulst verifiying this but unfortunately the real copies are down - heres what google has cached.
The prototype colour display has been made using CDTâs red, green and blue polymer materials and an industry first ink-jet printing process developed for the project.
Rather than illumination, they use electrified pigments or rotaing, embedded spheres to change the color of a sheet of plastic. One difference with the technology at UoA is that charge is only needed to change the image, not maintain it. One of the developers described it as "paper that prints itself," which gives you an idea of what kind of applications it could be used for (e.g. hourly updated price signs=good. Monitor to watch a live video stream=bad).
"Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."
hey dumbass... it wasnt copied... it was paraphrased... look that one up... moron
Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
So the same stupid comment isn't in the Fox article. Mea culpa. Look that one up. :)
ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
This is a completely blatant plug, but it is on topic. There is an EL technology that allows for a paper-thin cold light source. The first one we have produced is a "Linux" lamp. I have video of one on our web site http://www.exoticlights.com The lamp not only glows but also is animated. We have a few prototype units for sale.
When I was a graduate student at UCLA in 1998, I heard of Professor their that already patented the process for using ink-jet printing techology for creating Organic LED devices. The original paper is: S.C. Chang, J. Bharathan, and Y. Yang; "Dual-color polymer LEDs processed by hybrid inkjet printing technology", Appl. Phys. Lett., 73, 2561, (1998). If you want to know more about this, visit Dr Yang's website at http://www.seas.ucla.edu/ms/faculty1/yang-yang.htm l.
Heres a link to a neat demo of how OLEDs work.
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/oled/
Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
http://www.cuttingtheedge.com/qtakes/2001/foldable _lcd/foldable.shtm
Going to the list of articles you can see that this was featured back at the end of July. Sometimes it takes a long time for neat stuff to leak out.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
I work in computer sales, so i should know. Cost of most home purchased printers $50-200. Cost of ink(~$40) over 5 years, replacing ink once a year, black + color, 80 * 5 = 400. So you pay like 2x for the ink vs the printer.
LinuxWorx
Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
Here is an intersting page at universaldisplay corp. It includes some neat pictures and some video clips of the thing working. Not quite the same, but its OLED and on a flexible display. Neat.
http://www.universaldisplay.com/foled.php
Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
"right now, they're printing flat pictures, not moving, highly detailed ones"
hmm you might want to take a closer look at your LCD screen and check for moving parts.
to make things look like they move you just have to print these things at great density and retain the power to turn them on and off at will.
I would say it will certainly be possible to do it with this technology, but by the time it's that developed the established technologies will have moved on a ways and it won't be worth it.
'There is a Light that never goes out.'
Ok guys, not every new invention *must* be plugged into your computer in order to be revolutionary.
This process could obliterate the neon sign industry.
And bring Stephenson's "Loglo" a big step closer to reality as every available surface gets plastered in pulsing lights.
'There is a Light that never goes out.'
there's a lot of info missing from the crappy article linked. I myself are working with OLED's and the way these people represent there results is complete BS!!!
All this work has already been done a few years ago, and they dont mention that you still need to have ITO electrodes to keep te thing running/emitting light. And the distance between top/bottom or right to left side is in my idea way too long.
And most importantly, it'll look like those cool futuristic movies from the 1960s!
Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
by allowing bullies to not only put "kick me" signs on unfortunate kids' backs, but give them animated tips on form and ideal kick positioning. They could even tie in dynamic content such as a kick counter, and an automated "principal mode" that would change it to match the color of the wearer's shirt when an authority figure happened by.
I can see it now; I'll be sitting by a fire, talking to my grandkids...
"I remember the days when we couldn't change the wallpaper in our house without walking 10 miles to the home improvement store... in the snow... uphill... both ways!"
Want Linux games? HERE.
People may like to look at the website of Cambridge Display Technology, who invented LEPs.
Ho hum for the life of a bear
Pardon me, are there illegal sizes for paper?
--
(if you're still looking for the point, it was back there, in the post. </sig>)
Y'know this is kewl and all, but it's just what we need: more light! It's bad enough we have enough excess light to see most of the US from orbit. Before we start postering the earth and chroming the moon, let's at least figure out that street and highway lights should point down. Not into the atmosphere.
Anyone who has lived in the city and moved to the country or vice versa knows what I mean.
Light Posters?! Yippee. Once this tech becomes available to the yokel population we're going to see huge self lit billboard along the highway. Hope you don't need to see while you drive.
Anonymous cynic
size
n.
Any of several gelatinous or glutinous substances usually made from glue, wax, or clay and used as a glaze or filler for porous materials such as paper, cloth, or wall surfaces.
Cool!
--
(if you're still looking for the point, it was back there, in the post. </sig>)
Yay! The U of A's optics department is second to none. Here's the homepage for that department:
s p
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Directory/default.a
The FoxNews article is pretty slim, and I can't find "paper-thin OLED" on that departmental page, though I suspect the "Administrative and Research Web Sites" link would be a good start...
At the lab where I worked we needed a radioactive test pattern for a PET scanner, so I hit on the idea of filling an old inkjet cartridge with oxygen-15 labelled water.
The half-life is only a few minutes, but that's long enough for the print to dry and to run the test.
Don't try this at home though, we had 10cm thick lead to put the printer behind!
-Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent