Slashdot Mirror


Methanol Fuel-Cell Battery For Your Laptop?

Nick writes: "I ran across this accidentally when I was researching fuel cell cars. They have come out with a little methanol fuel-cell battery they hope will be more powerful than lithium ion batteries, at competitive prices too! (well, in five years maybe) Also check out howstuffworks for a great article on fuel cells in general." Beating Li-Ion batteries by a factor of ten is a very worthy goal.

66 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Sweeet by GuntherAEPi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean gas pumps at CompUSA?

  2. This was posted before... by diadem · · Score: 3, Informative

    A similar article was posted here before, dealing with Methane batteries for cell phones.

    --
    Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
  3. Just remember: by mrpotato · · Score: 4, Funny

    don't drink the batteries: methanol will get you blind, ethanol will get you drunk.

    --

    cheers
  4. it remains to be seen... by egomaniac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It remains to be seen how people will react to having to 'refill' their laptops. It won't take too many methanol spills on the carpeting for somebody to bail on the whole idea.

    Batteries suck compared to fuel cells, certainly, but just plugging the laptop in to recharge is about the nicest possible way to deal with power. I know I'd rather carry around an AC adapter than a container of methanol. Further, I don't have to run to the store to buy more electricity when I run out; people may react badly to needing to buy refills.

    I love the concept as much as the next guy, but I've been wondering if the practicalities won't end up killing it in the marketplace.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    1. Re:it remains to be seen... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      the nice thing about methane and methanol is that they can both be purchased in self-contained units, much like butane and the stuff that powers gas grills. In most cases involving fuel cells, the actual refilling is done not by pouring or injecting, but by simply replacing a gas cartridge.

    2. Re:it remains to be seen... by jht · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think ultimately you'll see disposable fuel cell "batteries", and/or an infrastructure where you can buy a little cheap pre-filled tank of fuel for it, much as you buy a battery off the shelf today.

      Only some of the more esoteric applications will have end-users directly filling the tank themselves. But if you think about it, most portable power applications today excepting laptops) use a disposable battery - so that is easy to replace with compact, disposable tanks. I think laptops will have hybrid power systems, with perhaps a Li-Ion battery embedded in the machine, and a small fuel cell to provide continuous charging of the battery - and it'd run off AC power when stationary.

      Given the higher power output and density of a fuel cell versus even a Li-Ion battery, having spares handy isn't quite so important. You don't have to stay so close to a refill point when your runtime is measured in days instead of hours.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    3. Re:it remains to be seen... by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who says it has to be the "only" power source in the laptop? Why couldn't you also have a Li-Ion battery and an AC charger as other power options, and swap as the need fits.

      I'm sure that the airlines would have an issue with me using a methane-powered device on an airplane... so plug in the Li-Ion. Or, you run out of methane... plug in the AC and Li-Ion for recharging at the same time. It's just as easy as carrying around a spare battery like a lot of people do already.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    4. Re:it remains to be seen... by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Funny
      It remains to be seen how people will react to having to 'refill' their laptops. It won't take too many methanol spills on the carpeting for somebody to bail on the whole idea.
      At least it wouldn't raise the questions that an ethanol fuel cell would raise. "Honestly, boss, the Everclear is for my computer!"
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:it remains to be seen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You were concerned about the cost of methanol
      verses the cost of electricity. In fact they
      both cost about the same. One gallon of gasoline
      in a car engine produces about 100-200 MJ of
      energy, or 27-55 KWhr. This costs about $1.30
      meaning that a gasoline engine produces usable
      energy at a cost of about 2-5 cents per KWHr,
      which is roughly what it costs from your
      electricity supplier.

      Of course Methanol has a lower energy density
      than gasoline, however, fuel cells are much
      more efficient than gasoline engines.

      It is also worth noting that it takes much less
      time to recharge a methanol battery (replace
      the methanol container) than to recharge a Li-Ion
      battery.

      Even if you were to refill the battery directly
      with methanol, it would far more likely come
      in an aerosol form than a pourable liquid. In fact
      this is the way liquid cigarette lighters are
      refilled, without any spillage problems.

    6. Re:it remains to be seen... by edashofy · · Score: 2

      Actually, you're allowed to carry a small amount of methanol on an airplane, as it's classed the same way as alcohol.

      Hydrogen fuel cells were under consideration for this same purpose, but were largely abandoned precisely because you're not allowed to carry hydrogen on an airplane.

    7. Re:it remains to be seen... by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      I like the potential of long-term battery life, say for remote scientific expeditions and the like.

      Another thought is that fuel cells can be made to work in reverse. Heisenberg's theroem comes to mind; it goes basically that any electronic device can be reversed, such that it's inputs become it's outputs and visa-versa. An example is microphones and speakers. The two are interchangeable, except speakers have been optimized in physical design to emit sound and microphones to collect sound. Heisenberg's thereom has been disproved... it doesn't apply to semiconductor technology.

      But, it does work for fuel cells... see this page for an example of someone doing it. So, you don't need to buy methanol. You can generate it electrically. In this sense, it would be similar to a sealed lead-acid battery. The material it works on is liquid and degrades through use, but as long as the system is sealed (and thus no transfer of fluids with the outside world goes on), it's rechargeable.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    8. Re:it remains to be seen... by MadCow42 · · Score: 2

      Are you allowed to "burn" that methanol, or activate any heat-generating, chemical reacting devices?

      From my experience, airlines are quick to panic about things that "sound" dangerous (and lately it's probably good to err on the side of conservatism). I guess however, that the market for these would be large enough that the manufacturers can lobby the airlines to prove their safety.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    9. Re:it remains to be seen... by Spankophile · · Score: 2

      People with a lot less technical knowledge already "refill" things.

      Gas-Station monkeys refill propane tanks. People refill Zippo lighters. In fact, there are even Curling Irons that take butane paks for generating heat. If rednecks and women (excuse the generalization) can refil their tools, why can't geeks?

    10. Re:it remains to be seen... by egomaniac · · Score: 2

      Huh? No I wasn't.

      I was concerned about convenience, not cost.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    11. Re:it remains to be seen... by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
      It won't take too many methanol spills on the carpeting for somebody to bail on the whole idea.
      It won't leave any red wine stains and shouldn't dissolve the carpet dye - it will just smell bad for a while until it all evaporates. You can use the stuff for cleaning, but ethanol is a lot better for that purpose. Ethanol also works well in a fuel cell, but is heavily regulated and taxed in a lot of places. Spilling the methanol on your skin is a bad idea (it diffuses in like ethanol, and like ethanol it athough probably not far, but it is a lot more toxic), getting it in your eyes would not be good at all. The stuff that gets you drunk is ethanol, the "Methylated Spirits" that is in a few countries was once almost entirely ethanol with a small amount of methanol added to allow more water to be boiled off. In most places the methanol is no longer in "methylated spirits" because it killed too many people that drank it.

      Here is a Material Safety Data Sheet for methanol, which list what you should do when you handle the stuff.

  5. Methanol fuel cell by SolidCore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hazards incurred by gasoline releases are greater than those of methanol releases, and will persist much longer in the environment.A recent study performed by EA Engineering examined what the costs would be to implement different methanol retail systems. They concluded that a new methanol retail system could be installed for approximately $70,000 and an existing gasoline tank could be cleaned, the pumps and plumbing replaced for as little as $19,000.

  6. sounds like... by turbine216 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...a previous slashdot story involving Motorola's attempt at powering cell phones with similar methane-powered fuel cells.

  7. Moron by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope you were kidding about that... Methanol is highly toxic and leads to blindness and kidney failure.

    Then again, I haven't read a good Darwin award lately....

  8. I'll get one as soon as it comes out. by Typingsux · · Score: 3, Funny
    That way, instead of having to keep a dog and blame it for my farting, I can say it was the laptop again.

    --
    The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
  9. Worrisome... by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2
    There's a lot of concern with battery chemicals leaking out and contaminating... Whatever. I'd be especially worried about leaking methanol, which is much more flowing than a paste or gel often found in typical batteries. Not only that, but seals could fail or you could overfill them, etc. and you'd end up with this stuff running around your laptop.

    Besides, don't fuel cells create a lot of heat?

    The benefit is you get lots of drinking water and fresh air while using your laptop! :-D

  10. Why methanol? by Manuka · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone needs to come up with an ethanol fuel cell, and when you run out, just fill it back up with cheap vodka.

    1. Re:Why methanol? by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's possible to design fuel cells to use ANY heavy-hydrogen long-chain molecule. Some fuel cells only consume hydrogen; but with a platinum coating on the proton exchange barrier, a fuel cell can potentially use any hydrocarbon. Ethanol is TARGETED by some of them, because it's cheap to make from corn byproducts (husks and whatnot)

      This means that you can also use propane and gasoline, BTW, as long as they're clean enough. Surprisingly, methanol (aka windsheild wiper fluid) produces more energy than gasoline when used in a fuel cell...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Why methanol? by Detritus · · Score: 2

      Ethanol was used as a torpedo fuel during World War II. This lead to the predictable result, large numbers of supply requisitions for torpedo fuel. The fuel kept leaking out of those damn torpedoes :-).

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  11. Great news everybody! by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That guy on the bus who plays Quake on his notebook computer just got ten times as annoying!

    Seriously though, how do you recharge a fuel cell. The howstuffworks article covers hydrogen fuel cells which you recharge by... inserting more hydrogen. They also make water, bad for notebooks. This prototype looks like a sealed system and being billed as a replacement for Li-Ion, which means it's rechargeable and doesn't leak. "Carbon nanotubes" are very cool but there's nearly no mention of an application to new forms of fuel cells in the literature. This press release is great but... where's the science?

    Just curious.

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
  12. Small? Memory? Recharging time? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I'd like to know is whether these batteries will have a so-called memory. Until Li-Ion batteries became common in laptops, cell phones and camcorders, I remember that you had to completely empty out the batteries before recharging them or you'd drastically shorten their lives. For example, let's say you have a 30-minute battery for your camcorder. If you used it for 15 minutes and then charged it, then from now on, the battery will only last 15 minutes. This can be a little annoying for a camcorder, because if your battery was partially empty and you wanted it full to record some event, you'd have to plan ahead and leave the camera running to empty out the battery, then wait several hours for it to completely recharge. (Yeah, recharging times were very slow on these batteries.) On the other hand, while this is merely annoying for cameras, think of the effect it has on laptops--you'd have to leave your laptop running until it runs out of power and shuts off abruptly. This is a constant problem for computers. Li-Ion batteries are not subject to this "memory" problem, and they also charge pretty quickly, if I know what I'm talking about. For example, the battery in my phone lasts about three days (one if I talk a lot) and takes only hours to charge. (I don't know exactly how many hours because I've never sat there watching the damn thing.) If these fuel-cell batteries are small, don't have a memory, last longer AND have much faster charging times, then I think they will eventually replace Li-Ion batteries.

    1. Re:Small? Memory? Recharging time? by jht · · Score: 2

      Memory effect isn't even that much of a problem with current Ni-Cad batteries, unless you habitually do a partial discharge. A couple of partials won't kill them, though running the battery through a conditioning cycle will usually help if it does happen.

      Li-Ion batteries will eventually die - they typically are rated for about 1K discharge cycles, IIRC. And when they die, they're more expensive than NiCad or NiMh batteries to replace.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    2. Re:Small? Memory? Recharging time? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fuel cells aren't really batteries at all in the normal sense. They aren't closed systems, so you don't recharge them, you refill with more methanol. This is a good thing, as it would only take a matter of a minute to get from empty to full, so no more need to have two sets of batteries lying around.

      Since they aren't recharged (pushing the chemical reaction in reverse) there is no memory problem either.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Small? Memory? Recharging time? by hamjudo · · Score: 2
      Recharging is just filling a little tank with fluid, almost exactly like adding more fluid to a lighter. Tanks have no memory.

      It's a lot cheaper to make many different sized tanks than to make many different sized batteries.

      Maximum tank size will probably be limited by safety concerns.

    4. Re:Small? Memory? Recharging time? by rhekman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If these fuel-cell batteries are small, don't have a memory, last longer AND have much faster charging times, then I think they will eventually replace Li-Ion batteries.

      Don't forget thermal deficiencies!

      The thing I look forward too with fuel-cells is trouble-free operation at low temperature. For me, living in North Dakota, if I leave my Li-Ion based laptop in my vehicle for any length of time in the winter, the cells will lose their charge. If it's long enough, I'll even lose the backup battery and the time info. If fuel-cells give me reliable backup power at zero farenheit, plus longer life, sign me up!

      Regards,
      Reid
      --
      I like teamwork. It's easier to assign blame that way.
  13. Carts Re:it remains to be seen... by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Informative
    Prototypes were depicted as using sealed, pen-sized cartridges. No filling necessary. I imagine that screwing them into the fuel cell would break a seal allowing a controlled stream of methanol to be fed into the reformer.

    I suppose that the manufacturer would initially charge a lot for these, but refill kits would appear shortly.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Carts Re:it remains to be seen... by thetechweenie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So,
      It would be something like CO2 cartridges for my BB gun or a cheap paintball gun? I would think that they would need to be recycled if this were the case. That would be a huge waste. Not to mention that they probably wouldn't let these things on airplanes. (That is, if they are flamable.) I don't think that we will ever see something like this in the future. I couldn't even board my last flight unless I handed over my cigarette lighter.

      --


      Um, this is my sig.
  14. Re:Longer battery life. by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Palm's a great example, but even that only lasts 2 weeks tops on 2 AAA batteries.
    2 weeks? Are you leaving it on all the time? I usually get at least as many months out of mine. Even when I was scribbling class notes into one, it still got fairly good battery life. It's set to shut off by itself after one minute of inactivity, though I usually shut it off before that kicks in.
    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  15. enough with the spills already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People, people, people... if methanol fuel cells become a reality, you can be sure they will be fairly well self-contained. If you're so worried about spills, do you were a hazmat suit everytime you fill up your car with EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS AND FLAMABLE GASOLINE?

    I grow tired of the "gee that can't work, it might spill" everytime fuel cells are mentioned on slashdot.

  16. Cell operation life by bofh31337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would think this would be hampered by its limited cell life. The platinum catalyst used by the cells electrodes will be poisoned by the methanol.

    The basic problem is that the power storage technology has not kept up with the large demands for power.

    We need something non-flammable and far less toxic. Maybe a zinc-air solution.

  17. Too bad by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    When I first glanced at the title, I thought it said "methane" powered. I just had a bowl of chile beans, a pickled egg, and a beer for lunch. If you could power a computer with methane, then I'm ready to light up a server room full of IBM z390's.

  18. Well, is it so simple by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    I spent a few moments yesterday cutting open the dead battery from my Sony VAIO 505TX laptop. My thinking was the "battery" for the laptop was a few Lithium-Ion cells, which I could pick up at one of the local electronics outlets and replace (keeping in mind mA/Hrs, charging profiles, etc.) As luck would have it -- there were three US18650GR Sony Energytec cells, which are a special 3.6v battery only available from Sony's Energy Products division -- a circuit board which monitors the life, strength and other vital stats of the battery. So short of finding an industrial supplier and getting the cells, I can forget rebuilding or even enhancing my laptop battery, the one which works with my charger.

    It's a possibility that I could get a Fuel-Cell battery, Lead acid, etc, but the only way I could use it with my laptop would be through the external powersupply connector, which means all the power management tools I normally have would know squat about the remaining time on the battery, since it would think it's running off an adaptor.

    Neat idea, but some solutions aren't so straight forward. For now I'll use the charger to run it, and a Tripp Lite inverter to run it while away from home, but in my vehicle.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Well, is it so simple by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      My hunch, as with many allegedly new and cheaper technologies, is that price of the fuel cell batteries will still be high for years and companies like Sony will continue to have proprietary components, cemented together with silicone adhesives or such and designed to be replaceable and disposable, which come at a premium anyway.

      Sadly, I can trot down to the office supply, or even (ugh) Fry's, and pick up AA, C, or D NiMH cells for next to nothing. As for NiCad cells, which I've had less success with, there's the HAM dealers who always have just about everything for the DIY'ers.

      As to usable life I've found batteries stack up like in this order, best to worst, top to bottom:

      Lead-Acid

      NiMH

      NiCad

      Li-Ion

      Duracells, Energizers, etc.

      Primarily I use NiMH cells in my digital camera and they're just plain awesome the way they survive heavy current draw and recharge well. Two sets, about 1.5 years old and still going strong.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. Methanol from my @ss by Milican · · Score: 2

    Finally, a notebook that will capitalize on the farts from my tacos. No more dead batteries, no more charging at inopportune times. A seemingly endless supply of noxious power. My co-workers will be pleased.

    JOhn

    1. Re:Methanol from my @ss by bugg · · Score: 2

      And methane isn't a gas with a smell. It's perfectly odorless.

      --
      -bugg
    2. Re:Methanol from my @ss by Milican · · Score: 2

      Good point and well said. My bad.

      JOhn

  20. Uh Oh! by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    With a fuel cell, I guess Apple's problem of self-igniting PowerBooks should be REAL interesting soon...

  21. Methanol toxicity by sterno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While you certainly shouldn't start downing shots of methanol, it really isn't terribly toxic by comparison. If you got it on your clothes it would simply evaporate. The heavy metal sludge you find in most modern batteries makes methanol look pretty tame by comparison. It also means that the environmental impact of the used up batteries will be far less than current batteries.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  22. Let me be the first to say... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    This idea really stinks!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  23. Chemistry Lesson by sterno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay folks:

    Ethanol - the alcohol that makes beer, wine, and liquor much more fun.

    Methanol - the alcohol that, if you drink it, will at the very least blind you and probably do a bunch of other damage to your organs.

    Methane - the end result of having chili for lunch

    It is not fart powered, and you can't run it on Stoli, okay?

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  24. Did some due diligence on this.... by nellardo · · Score: 5, Informative
    I did some due diligence on this kind of technology for a VC firm out of the Bahamas. They were considering investing in a spin-out from the Jet Propulsion Lab. If you check you'll see a dorky researcher holding a prototype and if you go here you'll see a newer stack. You can also read a bit about it.

    The one I saw, intended for eventual use in cell phones, was basically what looked like a sandwich of plexiglass and some spongy material. Two wires ran off from the sponge to connect to the contacts for a small fan. You'd take a bottle of methanol, squirt it on the sponge, and the fan would start to spin, slowly at first, and building up in speed as the cell heated up to optimum temperature (which I think was around 50-60 degrees celsius).

    Cell phones make a good first application for this kind of technology (as opposed to cars) because the price/performance ratio is high (cell phones are expensive for the amount of power they use) and the performance/weight is relatively low (you don't need a really big stack to drive cell phone). If the fuel-cell cell phone (or even just a widget to replace the battery) costs ten times as much, but lasts ten times as long, is fully "rechargeable" with a one-minute application of methanol (which could come in sealed, disposable plastic tubes, or you could fill it the same way you fill a butane lighter), and has no "memory" problems, then you've got a real winner. People will pay $1000 for a cell phone (they did when the StarTAC first came out).

    A car that costs ten times as much doesn't work, because that puts even a cheapie car into six figures. You have to get the price-performance ratio of fuel cells way way down before they become useful for cars. However, for cars, methanol distribution may not be a big problem - some researchers are working on gasoline-driven fuel cells. Not as clean as methanol (which exhausts CO_2 and H_2O), but cleaner than combustion, and the distribution infrastructure is already in place. There's still a price/performance problem, because gasoline-powered fuel cells effectively have a full chemistry lab built in, with three or four stages to go through before the actual power production. They also operate at much higher temperatures.

    Direct Methanol Fuel Cells are nifty because they're solid-state. A catalyst (platinum, I think) drives the methanol/oxygen -> power/water/carbon dioxide reaction. They do have problems with supporting rapid changes in electrical draw, however. Typically this is handled by putting them in series with a capacitor. The capacitor can soak up rapid increases in demand, while the cell itself adjusts.

    --
    -----
    Klactovedestene!
  25. REMEMBER: howstuffworks is the same website by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    That thinks people will pay a penny/page to surf the web!

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  26. Earlier stories on Fuel Cells by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Seriously though, how do you recharge a fuel cell?

    There were these links:

    Looks like you might just have to fuel it up (nb the motorola story). Just don't be a heavy smoker. [smile]
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Earlier stories on Fuel Cells by Quikah · · Score: 2

      Evionyx has a fuel cell that you CAN recharge. It is a Zinc metal-air fuel cell. The cool thing about this company is they are building a general power solution, not just for portables. They look like they are going into production sometime soon (just added a bunch of facility space), they are building electric scooters for Taiwan and AAA rechargeables currently. They are claiming >500 WH/Kg, about 1/3 of this methanol fuel cell, but still much greater than the Li-Ion batteries.

      Incidentally they claim to currently hold the Guinness World Record for longest distance traveled in an electric vehicle on a single charge, 214.7 miles. They say they should be able to get more than 600 miles. They used a modified Insight (converted to all electric).

      Fuel Cells look like a promising technology, the US should dump a bunch of money into this, get us out of the current junkie/pusher relationship we have with the Middle East.

      --
      Q.
    2. Re:Earlier stories on Fuel Cells by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Actually, check out this link

      Rechargeable (via DC current) fuel cell. Cool. Probably horribly inefficient, but you trade that for huge battery life.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  27. Re:Would this produce methane gasses? by Alioth · · Score: 2

    Methane, whilst indeed flammable, is odourless. The stink from farts is caused by things other than the methane gas.

  28. Re:Would this produce methane gasses? by NonSequor · · Score: 2

    Actually I thought that humans' "farts" didn't contain methane at all. Or at least, I remember hearing that. Cows do produce methane, and since methane is a greenhouse gas, cows contribute to global warming. Does anyone have confirmation of the above or am I mistaken?

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  29. Whatever they contain, they ARE flammable... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Or have you never seen someone light a fart?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Whatever they contain, they ARE flammable... by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      There are gases other than methane that are flammable.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  30. Re:Would this produce methane gasses? by tim_maroney · · Score: 2

    The waste from a hydrogen fuel cell is water. There are certain problems disposing of the water in a way that will not make the surroundings wet, which is a particular problem for electronic circuits. Current hopes are that the water can be harmlessly evaporated, but at worst, you might need to empty the unit's water waste into a sink or toilet from time to time.

    Tim

  31. Ouch by glowingspleen · · Score: 2

    I guess "Blue Screen of Death" could be replaced with "Fiery Hand-Removing Explosion of Death" in this case...

  32. The real question is: by aengblom · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real question is would Laptop/Cellphone "battery life" actually go up or would manufacturers just add "instant, always on, hot dog cooking functions."

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  33. Here's my question by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    Supposedly the byproduct of the reaction is water, which sounds good in principle. But where the does water go? Do you need to have a reservior for the water, or am I going to stand up with a wet lap after a long plane trip?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  34. Nevermind the airport by wfrp01 · · Score: 2

    I know I'd rather carry around an AC adapter than a container of methanol.

    Nevermind trying to get something like that through the airport these days...

    --

    --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
  35. Japanese Companies have all the fun by n-baxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't it interesting how the Japanese have an apprantly high tolerance for companies expanding into quite a few horizontal areas. Have you ever noticed that there are a lot of cool things that come from Japanese companies that are better known for more common things like cars (Honda's robot, Mitsubishi creating OS's for example) or the Matsushita/Panasonic company which makes all kinds off stuff. Now we have computer company, mostly, making FuelCell batteries.

    Why don't we see these types of things from American companies? Is it a lack of R&D? Legal restrictions on how far they can spread horizontally? Or just a lack of interest? Where are the cool ideas from American companies? And don't give me iPod.

    1. Re:Japanese Companies have all the fun by gnovos · · Score: 2

      When I lived in Japan, I had an Asahi toilet (Yep, the same company that makes the beer.)

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  36. I guess slashdot search was down when this posted! by ers81239 · · Score: 2

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/03/135020 2&mode=thread

    Been there done that.

    --
    there are 2 kinds of people. those who divide people into 2 kinds, and those who don't.
  37. Just a Technical Note... by virg_mattes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, the phenomenon you're describing is related not to the battery's charge containing capacity so much as its charge delivery capacity. This same thing happens to car batteries left on cold concrete floors. The charge doesn't disappear from the battery (well, a tiny bit does), but as the battery cools its ability to deliver the charge decreases. You'll find that if you chill a fully-charged battery, it'll stop working. But rather then recharging it, if you heat it back up it'll go back to working normally.

    Of course, fuel cells do work at virtually any temperature that won't damage the device it's powering, so, as you stated, this wouldn't be an issue.

    Virg

  38. Research, Research... by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Two bads:

    1.) They're talking methanol, the liquid, not methane, the gas.
    2.) Pure methane is odorless.

    Bad doggie. No biscuit.

    Virg

  39. Cost? Producible? by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

    AFAIK, no good way of producing the carbon nanotubes (buckytubes) for these cells has yet been discovered. They zap a lot of carbon to convert just a few percent to nanotubes, then try to sort the few right-sized tubes out of the mess. So if it can be produced at all, it's going to be very expensive.

  40. Alberta Oil Sands by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Fuel Cells look like a promising technology, the US should dump a bunch of money into this, get us out of the current junkie/pusher relationship we have with the Middle East.

    Actually, we don't need the Middle East at all. There are the Alberta Oil Sands which are insanely huge, and which just had an advance in extraction technology to become a lot more competitive.

    But we add in things like Fuel cells, etc. And then we can let them all go fight each other with rocks and sticks and stuff.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  41. 5 years away, maybe by Animats · · Score: 2
    There have been several small fuel cells announced in the last year, but so far, nobody seems close to shipping.

    Closer to reality is the Ballard Power Systems NEXA power unit, which is a 1200 watt fuel cell intended for integration into OEM devices. 27 pounds, so it's not too portable. Runs on gaseous hydrogen. There will probably be a UPS-like emergency power product based on this.