Slashdot Mirror
Cybercrime Treaty to Be Signed
texchanchan writes: "Yahoo reports that "Interior ministers and law enforcement officials from Europe, South Africa, Canada, the United States and Japan will sign the milestone cyber-crime convention.... [because] computer criminals... have moved on from ``innocent'' hacking to fraud, embezzlement and life-threatening felonies."" Feel the spin in that article, from the anonymous "official". We've posted about this treaty before; read the final draft and note it well, particularly the extradition provisions, mutual assistance (some other country gets your country to tap your phones, and send them the data) and the requirements to disclose passwords.
South America is becoming a bastion of freedom.
There are plenty of methods to hide data in plain sight with images and such. If I had real secrets, they wouldn't go unencrypted on a filesystem where only the kernel prevents access through a password. Or even store it in encrypted files or filesystems for which the password could be lost.
If I really had to hide data, I'd make sure noone would even see I was hiding something.
Here's another one.
Honestly, are we more afraid of terrorists, or
our own governments?
George II says that Terrorists hate freedom, and want to take my freedom away. That isn't true.
Terrorists can only take my life. Only my government can take my freedom.
Sickman's spinfusor catches Anonymous Coward by surprise.
May contain traces of nut.
Made from the freshest electrons.
Improve security. Seperate important systems like landing lights from the internet. Don't just sue people.
I thought fraud, embezzlement, and life-threatening felonies were already against the law on these countries!
Soon, the Internet will reach its originally intended purpose of allowing people to shop online as quickly and efficiently as possible, and everything else will be outlawed.
once Bush hears that this is an "international treaty", he'll back out of it because of US interests.
I'm moving to Sealand, last bastion of the real free world. Nice knowing y'all.
"If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
I think that racists are cretins, but they have a right to hate whomever they please. They also have a right to express themselves, and the internet isn't immune to free speech. Now if only everyone else would agree....
If there is something life threatening about a computer being hacked, then perhaps the computer shouldn't be hooked up to the Internet.
//m
Oh shit, there goes the [Internet].
So...all young looking porno models are out of work now....I's a sad, sad, day.
-- www.globaltics.net
Political discussion for a new world
I don't think a computer crime should go unpunished, but I certainly do not want some other government to have to power to spy on me, let alone my own. all europe needs to do is what, say to the FBI...we want you to tape this man's wire so we can continue an investigation.....where is the oversight? there is none. a wire tape can be started by another country by way of just saying this person is a suspect in an investigation.....Im sorry, but I would perfer that i have my constitutional right protected while I am living in my country of origin. this makes every citizen suseptable to other countries legislation.....I trust my government more than I trust a forgien government, and I do not trust my government a whole lot.
I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
Exhibit 1:
"[We will make illegal...]the production, sale, procurement for use, import, distribution or otherwise making available of [...]a device, including a computer program, designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of committing any of the offences established in accordance with Article 2 - 5"
Exhibit 2:
"Article 5 - System interference
[C]ommitted intentionally, the serious hindering without right of the functioning of a computer system by inputting, transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing computer data."
So now Windows is illegal in Europe...
Can you imagine if this was all just an elaborate project dreamed up by some guy who just sits at his house all day long dreaming up ways to get access to people's information so he can sell it? It's a brilliant idea. By the time everyone realizes this whole thing is a put-on, the culprits will have made off with everything they need.
Unless, of course, it's not a put-on. But by the time we realize that, the government will have made off with everything they need too...
Got Rhinos?
Of course, we feel it's all great to battle "child pornography" while we defend race-hatred, while non-Americans (who often have very different ages of consent) consider that an infringement of their free speech. So are we implicitly trading the right to different types of censorship?
I have to say that %50 of the spam I get on a daily basis is probably some kind of rip-off scam made up by some guy sitting in his room running on a free hosting service with a domain used to gather CC info.
:)
Does this mean that spammers will be considered terrorists? Will we have laws that will finally put these criminals in jail?
I hope this is the case. Since the last article I read about spammers, Ive been sending letters charging them for bandwidth ($50 a pop) if they continue to spam. Hopefully now I will be able to just send a little email to the FBI and say, hey, here is a terrorist for you to give hell to.
--------------------------
Is this a sig?
--------------------------
Attention! Now that this treaty has been signed into law, keep in mind that it is very important that you never forget your passwords. If you forget your password, and it is required for a terrorist investigation, you can be arrested for failure to disclose your password. Please be extremely careful with all your passwords, never EVER forget them.
Specfically:
- If you have Alzheimers, do not use any computer system that requires a password.
- If you write software, make sure that any time you ask a user to create a password, you inform them that they could be imprisoned for life in a foreign country if they forget it.
- If you have to remember multiple passwords, repeat them to yourself 100 times every night, before you go to sleep.
Please follow these tips to keep everyone safe & free from terrorism!
If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
Has anyone else noticed the increasing tendancy for the 'news' media to report links between mostly inert activities enabled by corporate and government stupidity, in the area of technology, and mass murder, terrorism and other, arguably more serious, crimes?
Seems a good use of FUD on the media and government's part to reduce civil liberties and conceal their clear wrong technical choices.
What kind of goddamn MCSE moron has a computer which controls landing lights connected, directly or otherwise, to the internet?
. . . that under the provisions of the United States Constitution, "Interior ministers and law enforcement officials" can sign whatever the hell they want, but only the US Senate can actually approve a treaty with another nation. And until they do, it's not law.
Also note that treaties cannot alter the Constitution itself, nor can they implement anything that violates it.
Insert "proving to the public that an expensive security system is flawed" for [this and that], and you'll see what I mean.
Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
I don't like where this is going.
Article 11 - Attempt and aiding or abetting
1. Each Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offences under its domestic law, when committed intentionally, aiding or abetting the commission of any of the offences established in accordance with Articles 2 - 10 of the present Convention with intent that such offence be committed.
Great. Now software developers that make things like Nmap, tcpdump, portscanner, sniffit, and other security tools will get jailed or fined out of existence and charged with "aiding and abetting" just because J. Random Cracker ran their software to 0\/\/3n3d someone's unsecured box. You just *know* some lawyer can't wait to make a bunch of money^W^W^W^W^Wuse this little bit of legislation to put people behind bars.
/*drunk.. fix later*/
Don't you see? If we allow the threat of cybercrime to force us to change the way we manage our landing lights, THE CYBERCRIMINALS HAVE WON!
Improving security is an admission that our resolve to enforce security as it is has weakened. We must continue to live our lives, connect everything possible to the public network regardless of how vital or sensitive, and protect our assets with poorly concieved security mechanisms. To do anything else would show that the hackers and the rest of the terrorists have won!
Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
This is the time to prove Lessig wrong. I don't know how to get a congresscritter's attention any more. They only used to pay attention to postal mail, which they are afraid to open now. But between telephone, fax, e-mail, and watching out for him when he comes into town, I intend to let my congresscritters know not just how much I despise this crock, but why.
It's time for a call to arms. Slashdotters can take down almost any web site, because there's lots of us and we're not too lazy to click on a few buttons. But if we want to avoid the tremendous pitfall this treaty will engender, it's time to slashdot Congress. I doubt there will be 10,000 phone calls, pieces of mail, etc., the entire Congress will get because of newspaper, radio, or TV coverage. If we're not too lazy, we can generate a normal ./ volume in faxes, phone calls, and so forth, we can make ourselves heard.
The alternative is to whimper, roll over, and cringe.
Article 10 - Offences related to infringements of copyright and related rights 1. Each Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offences under its domestic law the infringement of copyright, as defined under the law of that Party pursuant to the obligations it has undertaken under the Paris Act of 24 July 1971 of the Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the WIPO Copyright Treaty, with the exception of any moral rights conferred by such Conventions, where such acts are committed wilfully, on a commercial scale and by means of a computer system.
Look carefully at the last eleven words. Does this mean our warez sites are not covered under the convention?
No, no, no times 1000
The treaty is by corporations for corporations. It is slanted heavily in favor of corporations and their "property".
The treaty is intended to feed into the hands of RIAA and M$ and anyone else who thinks you don't buy music or software, just a single-use license to hear or use the item on a device, and by a person, THEY approve of.
In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
Every country that signs onto this treaty currently has citizens who can use encryption. The legalities are changing, it seems since the various governments realized that the cat is already out of the bag, wrt encryption. The bad guys got it, and the good guys need to get it now. Witness in fact, direct from the treaty:
So, it's simple. Make yourself a key, and begin to encrypt things you send. If you dont know what it means to make a key, then go read any PGP site, including the one (still) at MIT.
If you really want to oppose this at the level where it matters, then encrypt. Dont write your senator, dont address the fine folks in Brussels. Encrypt.
Remember, encryption makes the internet a cozy bedside chat. Use it with your lovers, and use it with your friends.
Fear only the One who can factor large primes in his head, and never let them put a key on your head or your hand. Simple. Easy. Fun. Have fun. Love God. Love your neighbor. And have a Great Thanksgiving, America.
But Germany is the country with the most tapped phones per 1000 inhabitants in the whole world, and still growing.
That they fund GnuPG hast something to do with the fact, that the european industry is afraid of Echelon.
But the government is really eager nowadays to enforce an Orwellian police state.
If you are able to understand german, there are some disturbing articles at telepolis about the new European cyber-police called Enfopol.
Anybody know a country which doesn't sacrifice freedom to "fight terrorism" these days ?
I think that using the word terrorist to describe a spammer just cheapens the word terrorist. Terrorists are people who try to kill and/or harm people. While spammers may be bad people, I doubt they are trying to hurt or kill anyone.
No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.
Can someone please give me an example of *ONE* "life-threatening [felony]" that has been committed as a resulkt of a hack?
I don't remember ever reading about one...
"One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
- Mick Travis, "If..."
Yeah. I work in a security/abuse department. I have seen both sides call the other terrorists. Spammers call anti-spammers terrorists. Anti-spammers are calling spammers terrorists. People who get scanned by a Nimda infected machine claim they are being scanned by hacker terrorists. Anyone who does something 'bad' to you is a terrorist now. Using terrorist in that way just cheapens the word terrorist.
No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.
"A European convention to be signed on Friday aims to unite countries in the fight against computer criminals, who have moved on from ``innocent'' hacking to fraud, embezzlement and life-threatening felonies."
This little quote from the article on yahoo illustrates another misconception... that "innocent" hackers are the one moving into fraud etc. Innocent hackers are still innocent hackers. Criminals that perpetrate these crimes intended to be criminals from the outset. The people (jerks) committing these so-called life-threatening felonies most likely never were innocent, or even hackers.
We should stand up and say something to our legislators, but realistically nothing will be done. I have tried to contact my "congresswoman" on several occasions to no avail. The only thing most politicians seem to care about are their careers. Sorry to the decent politicos for the generalization.
J
Fire in the sky
Section 9.2.c: ... realistic images representing a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct."
"child pornography shall include pornographic material that visually depicts
Rendered images will be deemed illegal. (Also note that section 9.2.b says you can't take pronographic pictures of someone that "appears" to be a minor)
And no, I am not a fan of child pornography, but section 9.2.c seems to be making new clarifications to current pornography law, and 9.2.b is just very poorly worded.
I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation
Voila, there's your line. Its accepted whats OK and whats not OK when it comes to hiring, by the same token a set of rules can be applied to hate speech.
Hate speech IMO is not OK because it infringes on the rights of those it is directed to. The right of the African-American community for instance, to live peacefully without slander directed toward them, is more important than the right of white supremacicts to spout their false garbage.
No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?
Here's a challenge to any mathematically-minded geeks with way too much spare time:
I want a new form of encryption. I want this form of encryption to take two separate plain text messages and two separate passwords. I want the algorithm to generate a single cipher text.
This allows me to have one real message and one 'bluff' message. If my password is ever demanded of me, I can provide the 'bluff' password. Lo and behold it reveals an innocent, readable message.
I probably have the skills to implement this such that the cipher text contains both messages in separate blocks, but it would be too easy for someone to detect the fact that the cipher text contains two messages. It would be great if somebody knew how to make this sophisticated enough to appear to any reasonably intelligent encryption buff to be a single message.
My limited experience in this field makes me think this would be very computationally difficult. Hundreds of thousands of internal keys would need to be generated until a set of keys is found that yield the same ciphertext for the two messages. Brute force would be unrealistic, so you'd need someone with some fairly serious math skills to come up with some fancy algorithm.
Even better would be if the 'bluff' text could be decrypted by some common tool like PGP. This would do no good if the person asking for passwords knew to ask for two of them.
The law makes it mandatory to reveal any encryption keys you have. Failure to do so can result in fine/imprisonment etc.
As a previous poster mentioned, best not be forgetting those passwords, you could be jailed for not supplying it.
So imagine a scenario, you slander somebody in the UK, under the UK's more draconian slander laws the UK government requests your files from your computer. The US law enforcement agencies then confiscate your computer and demand all encryption keys. You, not wanting to go to jail, supply them with all you can remember, however there are 3 you don't recall. You go to jail for not supplying keys....
... or, during the process of the investigation, the UK law enforcement officials let it slip (since they know you can't do anything to them) that according to your email archives you're having an affair with your wife's sister....
... or, they find evidence of slander and order you to pay restitution of 100,000 or face extradition and jail.
Mind, you as previously stated, until congress gives it the OK, this is still somewhat conjecture, but just encrypting anything is not necessarily the answer.
Unbreakable toys can be used to break other toys.
Don't take a law that's designed to stop malicious people and extrapolate it into something that's going to take ones and zeros and make them illegal.
I'm sure this statement would've been much comfort to Dmitry Skylarov as he spent weeks in jail. Obviously he's one of those malicious people that laws are supposed to go after. Just because a law isn't intended to do one thing doesn't it mean it won't be used anyway.
Simply talking about hacking or trying to figure out how things work isn't going to land you in prison.
Sure thing. I'm sure that Steve Jackson will back this one all the way.
The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
If you feel terrorized by a piece of email, you need to get a grip on your life. Honestly, it is just a piece of email. Delete it and go on with your life.
No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.
It was in Worcester, MA. 1998 or 1999, I think. A 15-year-old kid using a wardialer found the dial-in access number for one of the control systems at the local airport. Details of his crack were pretty sketchy, but I believe he brute-forced the password and got inside. I'm sure RISKS-L has the full story.
k.
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
Someone switches off the landing lights via the computer systems.
As a pilot who has experienced this sort of thing (through other causes) I can say with certainty that any competent pilot can either switch the runway lights back on or go missed (or both if their not comfortable with the situation). Most airports, even the large ones, have pilot controlled lighting (key the mike n times on the CTAF/Tower Frequency). If the pilot is already in the flair then s/he can already see the runway with the plane's landing/taxi lights, and unless visibility is really, really bad (in which case they can go missed) they can land at that point without the runway lights being on at all.
If there really aren't options (like a blackout due to thunderstorm, terrorist bomb, or luser system cracker), then the pilot can do a missed approach and enter a holding pattern (if on instruments) until the situation is resolved or s/he is diverted to another airport, or if flying VFR simply go around and either try the approach again or find an alternate airport. Even in the worst case scenerio turning off the runway lights, even on short final, is hardly life threatening. Hell, its happened to me simply because the lights had been turned on 15 minutes earlier by another landing pilot and the timer shut the lights off with the threshold about fifty feet away from my descending aircraft. Seven quick clicks on the mike and I completed the landing without even a raise in pulse. This sort of thing happens all the time in non-computerized systems, and I will repeat again, it is not life threatening. Adding a computer to the situation doesn't change that, in the least.
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
Perhaps it is time for the geeks of the world to declare the internt a soverign country, with and end user licenses agrement that says something like the folowing:
/. could declare soverinty along with other places that would work better too. I suppose my long rant ends with a summary. I don't reacall the citizens of the internet having a say, that is bad.
ATTENTION by connecting your computer to the internet you agree that
1) Everyone has the right to say whatever they $^&# 'ign want and you can choose to listen or not.
2) you realize that the internet might be insecure, like walking down a street, Provide secruity for yourself.
3) We wil not take down a page you find offencive, someone wanted to say that.
4) We don't care about treaties you all signed, they are not ours.
5)By conneting your machine to our network you agree that you have read this agreement, even if you are a government this applies to you.
6) I said that we don't care if you are #$%'ing offended you controll where you browse.
7)Don't look to us to solve your internal network problems, it is YOUR fault they were not secure.
To governments:
we know your country has laws, so do we, we don't care what someone in another country did, it was not in your country. If you are so afraid of content perhaps you are closed minded or if you dislike content perhaps your citizens shouldn't be here.
Perhaps someone a little bit better should draft the deleration of indpendence for the net, But Hey the whole internet dosen't need to be indepented, Perhaps
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master"-Unknowen
This is where Rubberhose comes in. Never thought I'd need it in America....
-Legion
Luckily congress still has to approve the treaty and we're lucky they're not stupid enuf--oh *shit*.
Free Techno/Jazz/DNB/MI Music by guys obsessed with monkeys!
I guess I shouldn't call bullshit without doing my research first, but interestingly, this story has some details:
In March [1999], Department of Justice computer crime chief Scott Charney regaled a gathering of bankers with the story of a 1997 hacker who crashed a telephone switch, resulting in the landing lights at a Massachusetts airport going black.
Regular readers of this column will recall my conversation with the airport administrator, who assured me that his runway lights never even flickered.
Another report adds :
This incident was benign
But authorities said the outage had in fact caused no danger and little or no disruption at the airport, which sees a half-dozen flights a day.
"I don't have any reason to believe
In other words, the landing lights were not turned out, not least because it happened during the day. The Euro official's statement may not be complete bullshit as I claimed, but it's misleading at least. According to this piece on media hacking, the story is false. Yet this government site repeats the story and even claims that planes were diverted.
Whatever the truth of what really happened, there's clearly large dollops of myth in with the facts and it's no wonder my bullshit detector went off...
God, I'd kill for a country that wasn't so full of it's own pseudo-moral in-your-face neighbors-want-to-tell-you-how-the-fuck-to-live-yo ur-life bullshit. What violence I wouldn't do to live an a free country that's actually FREE.
Hey, I'm not sure if I remember this correctly since the Unacceptable Textbook Ban Treaty of 2014, but weren't there some guys who pretty much said the same thing back in the 1700's and did something about it?
Hope that little comment doesn't violate the Revisionist History Act of 2019. Wait, hold on, somebody's pounding on my front door....
Max
My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
When asked, one must suply his/her password, right? So how does this work with doctors, lawyers (e.a.) and non-disclosure agreements with third parties? How will this law relate to other trust-relations which are also integrated within law?
Before a file is decrypted, it is impossible to tell whether it is part of such relation, or if it in fact contains illegal data, so how will this work out?
--Black holes are where God divided by zero--
This alone is nice, but the kicker is that the 5th amendment (self-incrimination) should prevent legislation that requires the release of authentication (as opposed to encryption) information. The courts have repeatedly ruled that while the authorities have the right to subpoena your data, they cannot (under protection against self-incrimination) require you to testify that the data is in fact yours.
So I read it. the whole thing. Looks like it will:
A-Keep a zillion or so int. lawyers off food stamps for the foreseeable future.
B-Reassure the int. fat cats that the "problem has been adequately addressed"
C-Set a new world record for obscufatory( I think that means unclear, sometimes contradictory and in view of the mass of existing law on the issue somewhat pointless) rhetoric.
D-Scare the pants off every cracker in the known world.( Man! I could hear all those plugs coming out of wall sockets all the way over here!)
E-Prove to the world that these guys(and gals and any others of the 8 or 9 known sexes involved) know what they are talking about and have banded together to do something about it!
As i sometimes do, I went to one of my old fart buddies and got his opinion (I'm 52 so these guys are really ancient). I explained it rather well I thought and when he stopped laughing he had this to say.
"Well it sorta reminds me of the Volstead act. (Booze prohibition in the 20's) We'd come out of those logging camps with a hell of a thirst and there was nary a drop to be had. We bought our booze from the local sherrif because he would'nt throw us in the pokie if we bought it from him. I don't remember that it changed much of anything at all except who got our wages. But you know that pretty much convinced us all that when it comes right down to it each man has pretty much got to make his own rules. You know what I mean?"
Yeah, guess I do. Well thaks for taking the time to read this. Jim Sofra, Queen Charlotte Island,"The trailing edge of technology"
Sharing of information privately does usually imply encrypting with someone elses key, and signing with your own. It's nice to know that signing alone gives anyone a clean alternative to plead the fifth. This makes the written word unrecordable until it is revealed willfully, as in a beaten confession, I guess. :-)
This theoretical person had either live in a shcak in the hills and not interact with anyone he/she does not know, or learn to deal with it.
Wait! I thought I was the paranoid one, and you were the one who vanquished harrasing messages with a tap on your delete key
No. You are the one who claims that spammers are terrorists. I am the one who deletes the spam and gets on with life instead of playing the victim.
No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.
Is to find some twisted way to get a high ranking politician or law enforcement official liable under the treaty.
Use the treaty as a tool against those individuals who passed it in the first place.
The wording of the treaty is loose enough that there should be plenty of wiggle room to abuse.
Just imagine a US official being extradited to some obscure european country... the US will nullify that treaty so quickly the photons won't have time to reach your eyeballs.
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
This quote is from the Alpha Centauri game. From the character Commisioner Pravin Lal (leader of the UN Peacekeeper faction), and said to be from the U.N. Declaration of Rights.
The following has the potential to outlaw current feedback system that keeps vendors providing patches for glaring holes in their products. See Bruce Schneiers CryptoGram.
If the interpretation of device is as wide as it was in the DeCSS/DMCA case, also discussion about vulnerabilities could be prosecuted. Not to mention the actual exploits that seem to be the only things that push some vendors to take action.
I live in Europe/Finland. Until now it has been mostly safe to distribute & possess things like DeCSS here, but that seems to be changing.
Quotes from the convention:
Article 6 - Misuse of devices
1. Each Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offences under its domestic law, when committed intentionally and without right:
a. the production, sale, procurement for use, import, distribution or otherwise making available of:
i. a device, including a computer program, designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of committing any of the offences established in accordance with Article 2 ? 5;
Note that encryption is only useful if you encrypt all your message and chat traffic. If you only encrypt the sensitive ones, it's easier to break. And it makes it obvious that those are the messages that one wants to break in the first place.
It's even more effective if the majority of people use encryption.
It's still easier to get rich in the US than anywhere else. That is not the be-all and end-all of freedom as far as I am concerned. Right now, it's easier to get rich in China than in Mexico, but Mexico is definitely freer. In places like Mexico and the less bureaucratically overwhelming parts of Latin America, you are pretty much completely free to try to get rich. But wealth occurs in the context of markets and infrastructure, and even in some cultural variables none of which have anything to do with law or governments.
Brazil does have a very cosmopolitan culture; great city life and night life. If you are will to simply make a good living and have a nice place, rather than get stinking rich, you might prefer it.
Hash: SHA1
...unless you're communicating with someone in the UK, who can
be compelled to hand over
in prison), and who is forbidden to tell you (or anyone else)
that using encryption to communicate with them is now
compromised (on pain of, you guessed it, five years in
prison. This is the way that ECHELON works: one of it's
functions is to allow certain members of UKUSA to get around
domestic legislation banning surveillance of their own citizens.
There's no law forbidding them from using stuff intercepted,
and then passed on by, friendly governments.
The worldwide stampede to crush individual's freedom and privacy
is the most depressing thing to happen since I was born four
decades back. Join the EFF, write to your governmental representatives,
and encrypt, encrypt, encrypt... secure your machines and networks
as well as you possibly can. Use IPSec. Use VPNs. Tunnel stuff through
ssh.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (CYGWIN_NT-4.0)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7/VmVkZawWPzItK8RAncVAJ0ZmBWoSyZvCTaez68
5GaHQtwd6JBeRGZIdnWZ8GQ=
=/2q4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe