Slashdot Mirror


Disney World Goes 802.11b

LighthouseJ writes "Over at CNN they report that Disney World in Florida has a 47-square mile 802.11b wireless LAN through the park with 200 access points. The move comes after visitors complaints that they couldn't use credit cards at every place in the park. Plus, it allows "cast members" to offer guests goods and services anywhere, not restricted to where the credit card machine is at. The man responsible, Murshid S. Khan, Director of Telecommunications and Technology Support sees this as a valuable technology, citing mobility and flexibility as the main reasons for the switch. Khan goes on to say that the system is protected by a 128-bit encryption scheme and software installed to detect intrusions. When he was asked if visitors will have access to the wireless network, CNN quotes him to say: 'We need you to come to the park and enjoy the park,' he said. 'If we start opening Internet cafes, you won't do that.' He's a smart man." So, running AirSnort wouldn't probably be the best idea? *grin*

83 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. How long will it be? by D3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before they get cracked and decide this was not a good idea?

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
  2. Probably more protection than WEP by Raleel · · Score: 2

    If they only have WEP, I won't spend a dime there. But I bet they are not dorks, they probably have everything done over a real encryption scheme

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:Probably more protection than WEP by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the presentation the conclusion was that brute forcing WEP keys was _not_ feasable. They concluded it would take >200 days to crack a 40bit key, the attacks against weak ICV's claim to succed in 24-48 hours depending on data flow. If you use equipment that doesn't have the ICV problem and you use WEP correctly you can be relativly safe.
      Granted there are attacks against WEP, but they are _trivial_ to defend against if one knows what they are doing. I think Disney probably employs a few network security engineers and consulted with the big boys before they deployed this.
      All those who keep claiming that 802.11 is insecure
      a) don't really know what they are talking about
      and
      b) are repeating some other chicken little's BS

      WEP can certainly be deployed insecurely, and by default will keep out a determined enemy for less than 2 days, but that does not mean 802.11 cannot be deployed securely. If you use the right hardware and configure it correctly 802.11 is as secure as a wired LAN. Add to that some type of VPN and it's probably more secure than most wired LAN's.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    2. Re:Probably more protection than WEP by Dudio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good points. I'd forgotten that the decryption vulnerability is based on the assumptions of weak IV generation and a fixed keystream. My apologies - it's been a while since July ;)

      If you use the right hardware and configure it correctly 802.11 is as secure as a wired LAN
      I think this is what you meant, but "correct configuration" in this context generally means walling off wireless portions of the network in the same manner as you wall off the internet. By treating the 802.11 segment(s) as potentially insecure, you can maintain your overall security posture.

    3. Re:Probably more protection than WEP by monkeydo · · Score: 2

      Although many designers are now treating 802.11 networks like the Internet it is not strictly necessary, or always a good idea. Whether you treat your WLAN as untrusted depends on your security policy, but putting it in your DMZ and using VPN to your LAN is not always a requirement because it is actually possible to configure the WLAN itself so that it is secure enough for most environments. Of course, some companies run IPSEC over regular LANs so security is always relative.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  3. I want to know... by nll8802 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long before that network is comprimised. In a matter of days People will probablly know what websites Mickey has been to (www.nakedmice.com) or what Mickey purchases online. (Probablly Real Dolls )

    1. Re:I want to know... by Fesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Compromised? How long until somebody drops a jammer in a trash can? Talk about pissed-off customers.

      'Course, I'm totally clueless about the jam-resistance qualities of 802.11. I suppose that it's actually pretty hard to disrupt the signal with interference, otherwise it wouldn't make a terribly good wireless protocol...

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    2. Re:I want to know... by deander2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, my 2.4ghz cordless phone does a real nice job jamming my 802.11 network. ;-)

  4. Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by pres · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are things the user could use besides surf the web. For instance, a little app on your wireless device that let you check the length of lines at the rides, the reservations at a restaurant etc.
    Still, just as is, it is cool.

    1. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by Mondrames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A realatively inexpensive device (solar maybe) for the kids' shirt. You lose your kid? Go to the security desk, and they can find what AP your kid is closest too.

      Also could be used to collect better metrics on which Guests prefer which attractions. Like Slot Club cards at casinos. Maybe you can get perks if you blow a lot of money in the gift stores (Glass Castle anyone?)

      I'm sure there's other uses too.

    2. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by jmauro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that you can surf the web. Just because they use Ethernet and IP does not mean that they are connected to the Internet at large. Taking into account that this system handles lots of credit card orders (even encrypted) it would make more sense if the entire system was on its own isolated network.

    3. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by TGK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      See, that's why I don't understand the resistance to making this technology available to customers. You charge an exhorbidant rental fee for one of these things, make sure it's well set up and easy to use and you're in buisness. It would be nice to have a way to tell when the line for space mountain is really short. I'd appreciate a searchable restaurant database with the ability to make reservations. Or howabout we sling a GPS device into it and let the damn thing give directions? If you've ever gotten lost in Disney world you know what I'm talking about.

      Lots of people collect "character" autographs (yes really), it wouldn't be hard to have these devices tell you where characters are in the park. The commercial applications of this are simply astounding... the only reason I can think of for Disney not utilizing it is the fear of someone breaking the system. To me, that says the security is sub-par.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    4. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by 0xA · · Score: 2
      ... the only reason I can think of for Disney not utilizing it is the fear of someone breaking the system. To me, that says the security is sub-par.

      I'd have to disagree with that. Running some sort of public access network on the same wireless segment you are doing credit card authorizations on would be silly.

    5. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by Lish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A realatively inexpensive device (solar maybe) for the kids' shirt. You lose your kid? Go to the security desk, and they can find what AP your kid is closest too.

      They have similar things already in use in theme parks. A water park I went to last summer had a system where you would check out a transmitter for each family member, on a wristband like a watch. You could take your transmitter to a viewing station and it would pinpoint on a map where the other members of the group were. So the kids can go off on their own and the parents can still keep tabs on them, or large groups don't have to wander around looking for each other. Pretty slick, IMHO.

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    6. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by burtonator · · Score: 2, Funny

      > A realatively inexpensive device (solar maybe) for > the kids' shirt. You lose your kid? Go to the
      > security desk, and they can find what AP your kid > is closest too.

      %shell%: ping johny.doe.disneyland.disney.com
      ping: unknown host johny.doe.disneyland.disney.com

      "ah... Mam... We have a problem..." :(

    7. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by trcooper · · Score: 2

      The article I read doesn't mention anything about IP. While it's probable that they are, they could be using another protocol other than IP.

      Hmmm... SNA would be cool :p

    8. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by trcooper · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm... They may already have this... They have these pins that light up during parades, fireworks shows and certain attractions. I would figure that they work on some sort of timer, but maybe they're 802.11 devices.

    9. Re:Things the visitor can do besides surf the web by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Disney already has a system in place called SmartPass which allows visitors to "reserve" a place in line so they can go off and do other things (shop) and come back later without having to wait in a huge line. They also get the added benefit of knowing which rides you went on and where you were shopping before hand (your park access card is your room key, park ticket, SmartPass, credit card, Big Brother device, etc).

      I won't get into it because it's to OT, but they also have biometric scanners at the gates for season pass holders (no privacy policy, 'natch).

  5. Porn on the roller coaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sweet! Streaming porn while you whirl till you hurl!

  6. If they're smart, it won't be IP... by rekoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or at least, if it /is/ an IP network, each device will be a VPN client. I would presume Disney has enough money to hire people smart enough to not depend on WEP for security.

    Then again, larger companies have done dumber things...

    -C

    1. Re:If they're smart, it won't be IP... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      true, if they were smart, they could have their own proprietary protocol made up and have all the systems use that. thatway no one can bring a powerbook or Dell laptop with wireless access to hack the system since the protocol would not be supported. then Disney could let people rent all those cool little devices to help navigate the park.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  7. enjoy the park... by sluggie · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We need you to come to the park and enjoy the park"

    Imagine your laptop in one hand, some candy in the other one and getting chased by 23 security officers running over and knocking down mickey and his fellows...

    I'm sure this scene is going to make it into "password: swordfish 2"

    this sounds like a big heap of enjoyment to me ;)

  8. headlines by josh253 · · Score: 2, Funny

    2 million credit card numbers stolen from disney world by 12 year old with laptop...

  9. Hmmmph. by dcigary · · Score: 4, Offtopic
    Proof positive that the Slashdot editors only accept posts from people that they like. I submitted this on the 18th and it was rejected even before I could do a screen refresh.
    2001-11-18 18:41:49 Disney's Wireless Magic Kingdom (articles,news) (rejected)
    God, I love the smell of burning Karma in the morning....
    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    1. Re:Hmmmph. by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      I've found that everything I submit has somebody else's version (usually a /. staffer) posted within three days, but with fewer links and/or less cogent commentary. I just content myself with the knowledge that I was first and better.

    2. Re:Hmmmph. by ChristTrekker · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      I completely agree with this theory. I've noticed that timothy tends to post the sort of stories that I'm interested in. It's only natural that the authors will pick the submissions that interest them, and throw the rest in the bucket.

      This points out a possible flaw in the /. authors' process. Perhaps instead of accepting/canning story submissions, authors should accept only and leave the others in the inbox. If nobody else accepts a story within 3 days, it automatically goes in the bucket. If michael cans a story, Hemos isn't going to be able to accept it any more. If it's submitted again the next day, maybe it will get lucky and Hemos will see it before michael, but you never know.

    3. Re:Hmmmph. by FortKnox · · Score: 2

      Or an option on submitting (checkboxes?) on which authors you are submitting to (or what authors you don't want to submit to).

      That way I can submit to Taco, Hemos, or Timothy, and avoid michael and JonKatz.

      It's a crapshoot on which of the three it will get to, and it could cause someone to get backed up with too many submissions, but I think it is worth trying...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  10. Hacking it by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They say they have "software" that detects intrusions. That doesn't seem to imply much about tracking you down to the square foot.

    OTOH, I don't recall ever seeing a laptop, so you'll stick out like a sore thumb unless you're in the bathroom with a PDA.

    They do search bags currently. ALL bags, even diaper bags.

    Also, there's an active Linux community among their IT people. There are definitely pockets of clue there, and it's likely that would extend to their IT security people as well.

    1. Re:Hacking it by Scoria · · Score: 3, Funny

      So hide the PDA in a dirty diaper. "WHOOOOO! You can pass," said the security guard. :)

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:Hacking it by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure that hacking Disney's network would be worth using a PDA covered in shit. Just me though... O:)

    3. Re:Hacking it by Scoria · · Score: 2

      That's what they made plastic baggies for. ;P

      --
      Do you like German cars?
  11. Scale is *the* problem by john@iastate.edu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's a lot harder to do something for 150,000 people at a time than 150.

    It's not just a matter of buying 1000 whatevers that worked for the guy doing it for 150.

    --
    Shut up, be happy. The conveniences you demanded are now mandatory. -- Jello Biafra
  12. Are they near an airbase? by lumpenprole · · Score: 4, Funny


    Because I'd hate for wireless Mickey 2001 to start picking up air traffic chatter

    Hi kids! I sure hope you enjoy the RED LEADER, RED LEADER THIS IS TANGO ONE. and make sure to visit our LOCKED, COCKED, AND READY TO BURN TANGO ONE, WHAT'S YOUR STATUS?

    And hey, under the recent terrorism bills wouldn't that qualify Mickey as a terrorist? There's be a trial to top OJ.

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    1. Re:Are they near an airbase? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      "Look at the size of that thing!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  13. The first thing I thought of... by pi+radians · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not another wireless mouse!

    Ba-dum-pa-chi! Thanks folks, I'll be here all night!

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  14. Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While on my honeymoon in DisneyWorld this year, my wife and I took quite a few of their Behind the Scenes tours. On the Epcot one, we found out why Disney will most likely never let people have 'Net access in their parks. (At least not in public places.)

    Our tour guide said that they actually did have a kiosk there a few years back that let people browse the web and check their web-based e-mail. He checked on the kiosk once and found that some pervert had left up a XXX e-mail and changed the wallpaper. He wouldn't elaborate on what it was, but he said it shocked even him.

    Luckily for them, they were able to remove the offensive material before anyone noticed. Still, as a place that bills itself as "family-friendly," they simply can't take the risk that it would happen again (and more high profile).

    Our tour guide kept the possibility open that they would resume 'Net access with some types of safeguards against this, but no safeguard is 100%. Public Internet access is just not a high-priority item for Disney. (Believe me, there's so much to do at Disney World, that you won't have time to browse the Net.) The PR risks of another abuse far outweigh any customer gains.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. CNN lies, it's not a 47 square mile cloud by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only about 35% of the 47 square miles owned by The Walt Disney Company in Central Florida is developed. I highly doubt they went through the expense of creating a WLAN cloud that covers marshland. I doubt that even the hotel resort properties are covered either. It probably only the 4 theme parks, the 3 water parks, Downtown Disney and maybe Fort Wilderness near Pioneer Hall. That drops the square mileage significantly. Even with the hotel areas its only a fraction of 47 square miles. I really hate bad reporting.

    1. Re:CNN lies, it's not a 47 square mile cloud by GiMP · · Score: 2

      As per another one of my posts.. I noticed that they had this network over a year and 1/2 ago, it may have only been in testing then.. or perhaps they just didn't want to advertise it until they worked out some security issues..

      But.. it did cover the hotels. The nice thing for us about this is that you don't have to worry about sneaking a laptop into the park if you are staying at one of the hotels.
      Infact, it was at the hotel I originally noticed it as I was glacing around waiting for my bus :) There was an antenna coming from a amplifier connected to a wireless card coming from their cash register. :)

    2. Re:CNN lies, it's not a 47 square mile cloud by GiMP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is ok with regulation. I work at an isp which is looking at deploying an 802.11b network. We have an amplifier on it. I don't know how good for our health it is, but i've stood next the the antenna for extended periods of time with no apparent problem.

  16. Hack Disneyworld by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    By definition, any given network is crackable. It's just a matter of time, right?

    Here are some exploits that we can be sure of seeing in the future:

    1. 'It's a Small World' animatronic dolls reprogrammed via wireless network to share their cultural feelings via a massive animatronic orgy of all nations.

    2. Michael Jackson's "Captain Eo 3D" video replaced with low-quality MPEG of a video taken of what really happened at Macaully Caulkin's last birthday party.

    3. Ride Space Mountain during DDOS season? Only if you're feeling suicidal. You never know when that modified Nimda worm is going to kick in.
    4. Parade of Lights all flash in sequence to spell out "L33+ X1DD135 OWNZ JOO DIZNY"

    5. Animatronic Abe Lincoln now shouts, "Beefcake. BEEFCAKE!!!!"

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Hack Disneyworld by lww · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I'd rather try stealing from DeBeer's, Fort Knox or the Mafia or something much less dangerous to my health...

      Have you ever been stuck on the Small World ride when the little boats get backed up? Ten minutes is what they do to the people they like (customers). Imagine how long you'd be strapped into the boat if they're catch you hacking? *shudder*

  17. Only news is that people have noticed it by GiMP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I took note of their network over a year and half ago when I went there with my Highschool senior class.

    I noticed the cash registers were connected to an 802.11b network.. also, I spotted some computers as well.

    I didn't have an 802.11b card at the time, and my only laptop had suffered a terrible accident.. so I wasn't able to do any 'diagnostics', but I thought it was interesting. Maybe next time I'll bring my PowerBook /w 802.11b card and go to work.

    See, you don't need to worry about getting into the park with your laptop.. Because this also extends to their hotels and probably their on-site buses as well.

    1. Re:Only news is that people have noticed it by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2

      The hardware was 128-bit capable for several months before the software came out, so it may still work. If not, just hold out for an 802.11g card ;)

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  18. Eventually a cash-less park? by acroyear · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Disney could eventually use this to lead to a 100% cashless park (increasing patron safety in the long run -- less need for cash might lead to less to gain for purse-snatching).

    Yes, we all agree that this network may be risky for transfering credit card info around, but they could over time move to a "disney dollar" card, where you pre-load the disney card with your credit card as you enter or on the phone or whatever, then use that disney card within the park grounds to buy whatever. Disney can then provide insurance against fraud against that card instead of worrying about being libel against Visa and AmEx in the case of number theft over the airwaves...

    The other advantage is that Disneys own systems could authorize the sale over the Disney card instead of having to send out to a Visa/MC/AmEx authorizer off site-- it would be considerably faster that way (since the system could be built up front to support the average # of visitors on site), especially during holiday seasons...

    Just a thought...

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  19. How about something useful by Quizme2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They should rent out wireless digital cameras, whenever a pic is taken its upload via 802.11 and before they leave the park, the got prints of the family vacation.
    Also a previous article said it would be used to play music around the park based on location. IMHO, kinda of a waste for just CC's.

    --
    "Get them before they get....
  20. Could be fairly secure by wiredog · · Score: 2

    The article doesn't say they are using tcp/ip. Doesn't look like it has internet access either. Probably requires some sort of username/pasword combo (possibly built into the devices) to log on to the LAN. If the encryption is properly implemented (a big if) it could be very secure.

  21. Re:Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access by m3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been there multiple times over the course of the year (annual passes are great things) and I remember the kiosks the guide was talking about. They were still up the last time I was there, but they were whitelisted. Meaning that only the websites that Disney had approved were allowed, anything else not on their list was automatically blocked. The whitelisting seemed to work quite well. Interestingly enough, Slashdot was readable, so I guess someone in the Internet department at WDW likes his news for nerds.

  22. Re:Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Our [Disney] tour guide said [...] some pervert had left up a XXX e-mail and changed the wallpaper [on a public terminal]. He wouldn't elaborate on what it was, but he said it shocked even him

    Probably some of that sick, perverted, Godless Pixar stuff. ;-)

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  23. If rather than when by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wouldn't bet my credit card number on it not being cracked, but at the least they do seem to be thinking forward on security, by detecting attempts to access their network.

    If you were planning to crack a network and steal purchase information, there's easier places, like dumpster diving, as I still see the occasional receipt with full number and expy on it blow down the streets with other stray litter.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  24. Re:Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
    "(Believe me, there's so much to do at Disney World, that you won't have time to browse the Net.)"

    I wouldn't mind being able to browse the Net while standing in line. Hell, even surfing through a white-list filter would be better than nothing.

  25. Re:Big deal by vidarh · · Score: 2

    There's many places in Europe, companies - especially courier services etc. - use either wireless LAN enabled credit card machines, or GSM based ones, depending on the range they need to cover. It's been quite common for several years.

  26. Re:Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access by Bonker · · Score: 2

    (Believe me, there's so much to do at Disney World, that you won't have time to browse the Net.)

    And here I am thinking that the best way to while away those 1-2 hour waits in line for all the most popular attraction would be with Unreal Tournament or Q3Arena. If lag became an issue because of the sheer number of devices and users drawing bandwidth, you could always play something turn-based, like CivNet.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  27. How long will it be before they get nailed anyway? by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless they're using IPSec or something like it, they're vulnerable. WEP doesn't secure worth spit even with 128 bits because they implemented the whole protocol as an insecure system. Also of note is the fact that there is pretty much no commercial IDS software that would effectively catch someone doing something bogus in time to find them in a wireless context.

    It's pure bravado that bases their claims of security- unless they have a security staff sweeping the entire park with DF gear, they're NOT going to catch anyone doing something illegitimate on their WLAN.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  28. Really? by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    With the electronic transactions that we have nowadays, you're going to see less and less of that sort of thing being possible. They're going to resort to snooping WLANs like Disney is setting up if they can. Sad thing is, they claim it's 128 bit encrypted- is that WEP or IPSec? If it's WEP, they might as well be broadcasting in the clear.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Really? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Something Disney or anyone else can do, is sell cards with a certain amount of credit at the park, similar to phone cards. I've received a few of these in lieu of gift certificates. Up to now Disney has issued their own money for use in the park, this would appear to be a minor change, then once the cards are exhausted they could be collector items, with various themes on them, like they do with the money. Sometimes better security is just a matter of a slight change in practice.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  29. Cracking the Protocol... by Orne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since you posted that AirSnort link, I was curious, so I popped over to sourceforge and downloaded it. Part of their documentation says: "For a key length of 128 bits, this translates to about 1500 packets." then it goes on to describe how you can search for certain constants (starts with 0xAA, etc) within the packet to see which random keys were successful. Interesting stuff, and definitely a clever way to decode: thanks to flaws in the logic, every bit rate can be reduced to 8-bit encryption.

    However, once you've collected your packets and broken the key, you now have a decoded packet. Well, what does that mean? You have the framing information (packet length, header) and the message body (which is just raw data).

    I'd bet a 7-day park-hopper pass that the data in the packet's body is encrypted a second time with a more reliable scheme. If there's one thing Disney knows how to do well, its make money, and they can't risk the bad PR for this to foul up.

    1. Re:Cracking the Protocol... by richj · · Score: 2

      Also, it's not hard to imagine Disney using some proprietary security solutions such as a RADIUS server for added security on top of WEP. RADIUS can be configured to change the WEP key every so many minutes.

      It's trivial to change the WEP keys on the AP, the hard part is changing them on the clients and keeping them synch'ed. Besides, I don't think WEP was designed to run credit transactions across :)

      I think a more likely scenerio is they have a fairly dirty "Wireless Network" that is traversed by whatever devices they're using. Those devices would have a robust authentication system allowing them off their dirty network and through a firewall. It wouldn't be too difficult to implement this with smart cards and IPSec.

      If you bring a 802.11 device onto their network, you'd be able to get a signal, obviously, but I'd find it highly unlikely that you could run a sniffer and get anything useful.

  30. who dunnit? by headwick · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The man responsible, Murshid S. Khan, Director of Telecommunications and Technology Support"

    I graduated UCF with my Computer Engineering Degree in 2000. For our senior design projects, Disney came and solicited us heavily to work on their projects. Free labor, helping a poor college student out with an idea, free labor, did I mention free labor. This project along with several others were mentioned. My comments regarding network security concerns were treated as pessimism. Needless to say I did not lend my time for Disney's free labor.

    --
    ~ fact is not dependant upon your belief therein. ~ ~ Have I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth?
  31. Old stuff by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Residing in europe for some time now (hmm, since I was born ? 8) I can tell you this is old stuff.

    Every (most) credit card are smartcard for 15 years in France. The credit card machine is in fact an autonomous code checker. It won't transmit your code on the air, but check it locally, then make a confirmation number that encrypt the acceptation code and your card references.

    this number is either send remotely for acceptation by the central bank computer (above $500) or just locally accepts if the amount is small.

    thoses devices existed before in Infrared transmission, and now use local radio link.

    This allows a faster and more secure way than just the stupid magnetic strip...

    Hoping to read from you 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  32. Useful if you can extract the value afterwards... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    I could see a "Disney" card where you can charge it up w/Cash value and use it like a credit card- with the ability to get a cash refund/credit for anything not used when you leave the park. Otherwise, it's no different than those gift cards Wal-Mart, Target, etc. are selling.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  33. Re:Good reason why they'll never offer 'Net access by Junta · · Score: 2

    Interesting that slashdot made it to the white list. It may be that bad images may not make it through, but with some if the comments and ASCII art trolls, I'm surprised Disney was willing to risk it..

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  34. Compared to IPSec, SSL is weaker... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    It's got vulnerabilities, just like WEP does- just not as exploitable. For a small subnet (and this constitutes that...) SSL's only moderately secure- because an attacker will know up-front that there's financial stuff predominately on this WLAN. If you're in on WEP, then you can then snoop for SSL weaknesses without them knowing, etc. If they're relying on most of the encryption techniques out there, it'll keep most of the script kiddies from pulling something off- but nobody else.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  35. This wouldn't be that hard by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    The last time I was in a Disney Store I noticed that they sell gift cards, accepted only at Disney Stores, that you can load with any amount up to $500. (These are similar to the ones most major chains sell these days, from B. Dalton to Target.) I forgot to ask whether they were accepted at the parks, but it wouldn't surprise me, since in some ways Disneyland is the world's biggest Disney Store.

    It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to adapt the cards to the technology. In fact it would make some things easier -- include a card on the back of each Annual Pass, for instance, and the passholder would automatically get their 10% discount on park purchases, plus they'd be more likely to store money on the card (which of course could only be used to buy stuff from Disney).

    As good as Disney is at extracting money from patrons, this seems like a natural for them.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  36. Won't protect you much... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    All you need to do is monitor the ethernet frames or whatever else is coming in on the RF modem. All using a goofball protocol does is ensure that script kiddies don't get in on first base of hacking the net.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Won't protect you much... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      isn't that who they have about 90% to worry about?
      also, it would allow them to come up with some realy cool stuff built into the protocol, and perhaps even before the connection can be granted, the device has to be authorised to communicate by a central server based on a name. if some one tries to hack it , an alarm can sound and a built in locator can give security the persons location. creating their own Protocol can reduce risk a tramendus amount and let them add nice fetures that you could not get in IP.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  37. False assumptions.... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Don't assume that just because you were never bored, ON YOUR HONEYMOON I might add!, that nobody else is never bored either, or never has other reasons to remain connected. Besides the obvious down time in lines, at meals, etc., there's the fact that some people have older relatives near death, younger relatives near childbirth, etc. You can't put your life on hold, and carrying celphones everywhere is not always an option.

    As for the kiosk abuse, that's completely irrelevant when you're talking about people using their own wireless devices. Think anyone is going to leave an expensive laptop or PDA lying around? If they keep it with them, then it's easy to identify the person responsible for the images.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  38. Additional information-crypto and GUEST TRACKING? by thermowax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More info to be found at http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_ STO65816,00.html . They mention that it involves "128 bit encryption", which certainly leads one to think 128b WEP, but remain cagey about further security- I'll vager VPN. One thing that did catch my eye was the guest tracking. They propose the innocuous example of insuring guests have all returned to a cruise ship- but I think that sets a dangerous precedent...

    Anyone else see Westworld/Futureworld? ;)

    Thermowax

  39. Wireless networks by Rupert · · Score: 2, Funny

    People really have no clue about how to secure wireless networks.

    I'm sitting here typing this while I wait for Jim "Open Source is Un-American" Allchin to deliver the keynote at the Windows Embedded Developers Conference. I have already found one guy on the un-WEPed 802.11b network with his C: drive mapped as \\steven2\c

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  40. The funniest thing I've ever seen... by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    While working for the rat-king a number of years ago, I went to lunch in the cafeteria under the magic kingdom. I walked in and saw Snow White, in complete costume and makeup, sitting on her boyfriend's lap smokign a cigarette.

    Maybe Snow can start start taking credit cards to turn tricks in the alleys of main street. :-D

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  41. Re:Tell that to the joker that bought $2300 of stu by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    Nobody asks for a signature for mailorder or online purchases- how would they DO that.

    While it isn't done often, it does happen.
    They do it by fax machine or snail mail, and it's a real PITA, especially when you don't have a fax machine.

    I bought a MC218 (Psion 5mx copy) from Expansys in the UK, and
    they had me fax over a signed photocopy of my card and my driver's license before they'd run my order.
    Not sure if they do this for all orders or just for international ones tho.

    C-X C-S

  42. Yes it is, and here's why by chainsaw1 · · Score: 2

    Any information needed to make a purchase is stored. Typically up until now it has been CC# and exp date. As you mentioned, more information is being required now to make the same purchase.

    However, for one click shopping, etc. that many online retailers have (where no signature is required or signature is on a digital pad), they still have to store all that extra information, because it's needed to authenticate the purchase. So when anyone stumbles across your database, they still have the access to the information they need, they just need to grab 5 columns instead of 2.

    The only method you mentioned that would solve this is faxing the signatures. And if the signature is digital (UPS, MicroCenter, etc), it's probably stored as a LOB in the database in a picture format anyway, and the Hacker now has a printable version of your signature. Also, most e-tailers don't have your signature because it's impracticle to get it from you. Remember, just because your CC was stolen from somewhere that needs a signature, it can still be used somewhere that doesn't

    --
    - Sig
  43. Re:Whatever by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    What would a thief do with several hundred dollars worth of gas?

    One of my friends lost one of his credit cards. He reported it as soon as he realized it, but not before the person who found it apparently called all his friends and relatives and they all had a 'free fill-up' party with it. The dude then went and bought a few PlayStations, I think in a Funcoland. There were a few other odd purchases, but I think the CC company finally put a halt on the card when dude tried to buy a computer somewhere.

    Nothing could really be done about the pay-at-the-pump gas station, but the stores should have at least matched the signature on the card to the signatures on the receipts. My friend got back copies of the thief's receipts and the times they forged my friend's signature on them, the signatures were not even CLOSE. A few times the thief just signed another arbitrary name. Even so, the purchases sailed through no problem until the CC company's computers apparently noticed an aberration from the normal buying patterns on that card.

    Fortunately, the CC company ate the costs instead of sticking them on my friend, but he had to fight like hell for a while to get them to do it.

    ~Philly

  44. Re:Whatever by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

    Heck, my card isn't even signed. Maybe one out of every 20 merchants actually asks to see my driver's license to verify my name with a photo, the rest just don't care. It says right on the card "don't accept this without a signature". Sigh. Lazy workers'll get you every time.

  45. They'll have security by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    There's no way that Disney wouldn't take network security VERY seriously for this project. Although it does make me a bit nervous they placed so much emphasis on the 128-bit encryption.

    I tcpdumped about 10 megs of data snarfed from the most wirelessly connected university in America, and besides broadcast queries for NT servers and floods of IPX SAP frames coming from network printers, the *only* packet of interest I got was the output of a finger some guy ran against his own OpenBSD box on campus. And I later found plenty of security-related posts from this guy on usenet, too. How's that for irony?

    I went home and reviewed web pages describing their security infrastructure due to the weakness of 802.11b, and it was very intense. Beyond Kerberos. If Disney's doing this specifically to mobilize credit card readers, I've gotta say that wireless has been weakened long enough for them to not have any excuse to do it right.

    Not to mention, with IBM's Tomorrow World being such a big hit in Epcot (and Disney closing DIG, their Internet venture), I'm SURE we had something to do with their planning and deployment. And I totally agree with the others who have said that enabling wireless PDA's such as line checking, maps, and restaurant reservations.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  46. heh by British · · Score: 2

    Great, instead of war driving, people will be doing war riding on "It's a small world after all".

  47. Why should Disney care what I do? by jabber01 · · Score: 2

    If I've already paid admission, and can't get knick-knacks and food from anywhere but their shops, why should Disney care if I come for the attractions, or the Wireless?

    After I've bought my ticket, I'm IN the park. IIRC, the rides don't cost anything but time after that. I'd much rather check tomorrows weather on my Pilot, plan out my next day at Epcot while in line at Magic Kingdom's Pirates of the Carribean, and just shoot out a quickie "Wish you were here" email over lunch, than have to wait until I get home to do these things.

    It's not about 'enjoying the park'. It's about the cost of providing the additional service. It's always about the MONEY. This is DISNEY people.. They have a Copyright on FUN, remember?

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  48. Re:Lets hope they have repeaters by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    I have too much of a migraine to look this up right now, but there's a special coax designed for 802.11. It has holes in the shielding. Yes, it's true that there's definitely signal loss over distance down the copper, but this stuff is designed for wireless-enabling hallways and rooms separated by concrete, such as classrooms.

    You can run this stuff all along the walkways and gutters of buildings to fill in most of the dead spots in the open areas.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  49. Re:Is this true or an urban legend? by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    In this case, I saw it first hand. But I'm not surprised this is the kind of thing that ends up as urban legend. Disney is often the target of urban legends. There is a lot of silliness that goes on at disney though. Employees (I mean cast members) have been scolded for refering to people in mickey mouse costumes. That actually is Mickey Mouse! My step father was an architect for disney for 25 years. My mother was a secretary for disney for 9 years. I saw the light after only 8 months. In disney, they call it pixey dust. It's like a magic brainwashing dust that gets sprinkled on you when you arrive at work. You're supposed to believe you're in another world while working. It's the only job I've ever had where I was ordered to smile.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  50. Smartcards in France. by pi_rules · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I'm not mistaken one of the engineers of the system tried warning the French government that it was possible to make a smart-card that could be fake; ie: not really "filled" with real money. Nobody would listen so he finally made one, bought some subway tickets and mailed them to the government proving that it could be done.

    Then they threw him in jail for stealing the subway tickets. Anybody else remember this or have more info on it?

  51. Redifines security hack by DiveX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >They do search bags currently. ALL bags, even diaper bags.

    Maybe, but not very well. For the past three of the four times I have been there since Sept 11 (my girlfriend and I have season passes) I was able to walk around the security stands without even being noticed. I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why they search the bags, yet do nothing to search the person. A couple of shootings at Disney would demoralize the US more than shootings pretty much anywhere else. An entire AK-47 can be broken down into pieces that fit in a pants leg or under a large sweatshirt. Everything of destructive power that is carried in a bag can be carried on one's person. Thay are pretty clueless about technology anyway. I often take in my nightvision scope (a lot of neat things to see in Space Mountain, Spaceship Earth, and Pirates of the Caribean) and didn't even get a second look yet they made me disassemble my Camelbak water pouch. I don't know if they would stop a laptop or not. One can claim it is for download pictures or showing Disney DVDs to the kids at dinner when they get tired and cranky.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  52. New lyrics for Mickey Mouse club theme song by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    The inevitable consequence is that the network will be very insecure, so let us mess with the lyrics:

    "M-I-C-K-E-Y...
    Why? Because w3 0wnz0r j00!!!!"

    Well, it is a lot easier than saying "because 802.11b doesn't specify encryption at the physical level".

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  53. I was just there by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    In Epcot, the small souvenir stands all had what looked like paper towel tubes wrapped in wire. Those were the 802.11 antennas, but they were there for over a year.

    In Disney/MGM, some popcorn and hotdog stands still couldn't take charge cards as of last week, so I guess it's still being rolled out.

  54. I would use an Internet cafe by suprax · · Score: 2

    I don't know about everyone else but when I went to Disney World a few years ago I was dying for Internet access. I had not bought my laptop then and looked everywhere for someplace to log onto the Internet while I was there. I have to be connected where-ever I go and if Disney had an Internet cafe, even if the price was expensive (like everything else), I would have used it no doubt.

    Anyone else feel this way or am I just too big of a geek? :)