Slashdot Mirror


Archos Announces Portable Mediabox

An Anonymous Coward writes: "Archos has just announced the Jukebox Multimedia Portable Entertainment Center. Due this January, The unit is the same size and weight as the company's Jukebox 6000 MP3 portable, plays and records MPEG4 video, MP3 and WMA audio, has a color video screen built-in, and offers a FireWire interface as an option. What's most interesting about the player is an expansion connector that allows additional modules to be attached to the unit. One module lets the player take digital photographs and another allows the unit to record video from a TV. Neat concept that's more flexible than the Bokks AV component reported on Slashdot last week, but I think I would want more than the 10GB drive it uses for storage."

135 comments

  1. MPEG4 video? by Bonker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Question for me is, are the different mpeg4 formats similiar enough that I can play my DiVX 3 and DiVX4 anime fansubs on it?

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:MPEG4 video? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      There is only *one* MPEG4 standard; DiVX and 3iVX etc are bastard children of the MPEG4 standard.

      Now there may be multiple implementations (Apple, Microsoft, etc), but like MP3, should, if the standard means anything, be cross compatible, though I have heard that the MPEG4 standard allows for multiple codecs (ala Flash layered with MP3 audio etc)... but I don't know about the last bit.

    2. Re:MPEG4 video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh god I am going to zero-fill my hard drive and kill myself now

    3. Re:MPEG4 video? by Bi()hazard · · Score: 1

      If you look at the article closely, it says it uses CIF format video, which can be used interchangeably with VHS in their implementation. This allows you to use the device as a VCR, but not as a DiVX player. However, since CIF is not a corporate proprietary format, most professional video editing software packages will allow conversion of standard MPEG video to CIF.

    4. Re:MPEG4 video? by hajmola · · Score: 1

      have you figured out the answer to "your" question yet??

  2. I fear the battery life will suck royally by NickV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The major problem with products like these is the battery life is going to suck royally. My iPaq uses a high end Lithium Polymer battery, and I still only get about 8 hours of battery life... and that's not even doing something too intensive like playing mp3s or watching movies.

    Can you imagine the processor needed to decode mpeg4 on the fly? Can you imagine the processor needed to RECORD mpeg4 on the fly? Can you imagine how long this processor will run on 4 Rechargable NiMH AA batteries?

    Ick.

    1. Re:I fear the battery life will suck royally by magicslax · · Score: 0

      If I had moderator points I'd be using them. Instead, I'll just call it like it is - right on.

      The benefit of the massive storage space is flushed away by the ineviatable short battery life. How do you put down or watch 10gigs of video when you can only keep the thing on for a handful of hours. The situation is even worse with audio, since playing them eats up so much of your precious time.

      Now why didn't I think of that?

    2. Re:I fear the battery life will suck royally by Bi()hazard · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who works for Consumer Reports, and they tested a version of this model recently, actually. The report should be shortly after the final release. In general, it's clunky and overloaded. The battery life was a major issue-but interestingly it varies considerably between units. They decided to get cheap, and buy batteries without rigorous quality assurance, and the result is the stuff you see described in some of the other posts. One unit gets 5 or 6 hours, another gets 4, and one gets 8, even though they're performing the same tasks. Of course, using the more energy intensive features will cut the battery life down to as little as 2 hours. Buying a top quality replacement battery can help a lot, if you don't mind the work and extra expense. Overall, we found individual single purpose gadgets to be more efficient and effective in every respect; you'll be better off getting the jukebox's functionality from multiple devices-plus the multiple devices can work in parallel, whereas the jukebox can use only one module at a time. They haven't announced the price yet, but rest assured it will be quite high. With modules, it's price will likely rival that of a PC.

    3. Re:I fear the battery life will suck royally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Microsoft Battery rocks ! It provides any portable electric device with an advanced Microsoft battery charge, and would power the GC continuously for 10 years and a week ! No kidding ! The same battery can power the more advanced X-Box for over 50 eons, because the X-box doesnt use the shit, overpriced PowerPC processor that those fucked up macs use! Microsoft, now they make the BEST battery as well as the BEST console, the BEST input devices, the BEST software, and the absolute BEST operating system WINDOWS XP !!!

    4. Re:I fear the battery life will suck royally by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Just an idea - wasn't the Crusoe chip supposed to be ideal for this kind of thing? Much better battery life etc. (I get 12-14 hours out of my Libretto with extended battery, 4-5 with standard) and still minimum of 600Mhz processing speed.

      Perhaps something like that would help power these items, without killing batteries every 3 hours.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  3. pockets? by magicslax · · Score: 2, Funny

    While the article claims the device will fit in a pocket, the odly shaped modules sure wouldn't. And at 12+ ounces already, it becomes an ungainly, low resolution digital camera...

    ...or a digital video camera with a _very_ long recording time. Somebody mentioned in a previous article how nice it would be to attach a 40 gig ieee1394 drive directly to a camera for hours of digital footage. 10gigs is certainly a step in the right direction, it just looks strange.

    ****IT SLICES IT DICES IT MAKES MPEG4 - your fully buzzword compliant device!****

    1. Re:pockets? by MstrFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can get better. I have the 6000 jukebox and found that a 30 gig drive fits quite nicely in it and works as well as the 6 gig it comes with, and at $150 it makes a nice upgrade and only drops battery life by about an hour. Using the Monster 1800 ma NIMs corects that quickly as the bats it comes with are only 1500 ma NIMs. They also have 48 gig drives that are the same size over on pricewatch.com, havent tried one of those in my jukebox, but I bet it would be real nice in this player.

      --
      Question reality.
    2. Re:pockets? by MinusOne · · Score: 2

      I also have a Toshiba 30GB drive in my Jukebox 6000 (does that make it a Jukebox 30000?) Tishiba's highest capacity drive in the 9.5mm form factor is 40GB. I don't think that the 48GB drives you see on Pricewatch are 9.5mm, I think they are 12.5mm, which will not fit in the Archos. I'm not certain, but I think that 40GB is the max for now, but just a few months ago when I upgraded my Jukebox 30GB was the max. I suspect that by the end of 2002 you will be able to buy a 100GB drive that will fit.

    3. Re:pockets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pockets? What has it gots in its pockets, my Precious?

  4. Hmm... by cascino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sure that the the features of this new model will attract many, but I'll personally stay away: I've had three bad experiences with Archos products.
    I purchased an Archos 6000 MP3 player from ThinkGeek about two months ago, and it arrived DOA. It simply would not turn on. I got my money back (TG was excellent as far as service is concerned, by the way), and used it to purchase an Archos HD-MP3 from a retailer in New York (who offered the better model at approximately the same price). I figured that the first time was probably a fluke, and besides - the better model offered the ability to record MP3's, something I could definitely use to for live music recording.
    Two more returns later, and I'm still waiting for my fourth Archos MP3 player. My experiences may be the exception to the rule, but I'd be wary of something like this until reliability figures come out.

    1. Re:Hmm... by matthewn · · Score: 1
      Similar experience last June. Jukebox 6000 #1 (from Fry's, San Jose) worked for an hour, then died. Jukebox #2 reported an error and "RETURN UNIT" on its tiny little screen.

      Archos support suggested to me that I return unit #2 at a different Fry's location, because perhaps "the crate at San Jose Fry's got dropped." Sound advice: unit #3 came from a different location, and it's performed flawlessly from day one. Great product.

      Perhaps with an Archos, if you get past the first day, you're in the clear.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I purchased an Archos 6000 MP3 player from ThinkGeek about two months ago, and it arrived DOA. It simply would not turn on.

      Did you let it charge for a few hours before trying to use it first? And you have to hold down the power button for a few seconds before it will turn on.

      (No offense intended; it took me a while to realize how to get it on, and I hope your luck isn't so bad as to get 3 bum units...)

    3. Re:Hmm... by OmegaDan · · Score: 2

      I can't explain 3 bad units, but I can tell you the unit acts *very* flaky when its batteries are completley dead/bad ... won't power on, won't charge (this is the kicker!) ... it seemed to me the cpu draws its power from the batteries regardless of wether its plugged into the wall ... The batts went bad on mine one day, and it wouldn't charge, wouldn't play, gave HD errors when it *would* turn on ... I changed out the batteries -- it ran like new again ...

    4. Re:Hmm... by cascino · · Score: 1

      Did you let it charge for a few hours before trying to use it first? And you have to hold down the power button for a few seconds before it will turn on.
      Yeah, I let it charge. No text in the display would come up at all - even when charging. The backlight would turn on, but regardless of how long it had been charged, I couldn't get text to appear on the screen. It worked just fine as a USB harddrive, but something seemed to be wrong with the LCD screen. My second unit did not suffer from the same problem, so I'm pretty sure that I wasn't at fault. Thanks for the thought, though.

    5. Re:Hmm... by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm glad that they decided to go with the some sort of high-speed transfer, the Archos 6000 skips pretty bad when playing through a playlist, when hooked dirctly to the computer, now stand-alone with headphones its OK, but Firewire and USB 2.0 will sweeten the deal...

    6. Re:Hmm... by bfree · · Score: 2
      Perhaps with an Archos, if you get past the first day, you're in the clear.

      Unfortunatly not if your me anyway :-( My Jukebox 6000 worked fine for nearly two months and then the Hard Disk died :-( Now I'm deciding where the money from my refund will go :-) I think I'll wait a few months for a firewire+usb(+network) 25Gb+ Hard Disk that's no bigger or heavier than the Jukebox 6000 was (that was my weight limit for sure) and preferably has a good battery life (like 24 hours of play so you can take it away for the weekend and at least one hour as a portable hdd).
      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    7. Re:Hmm... by hamanu · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your archos had it's contrast set to 0. There are instructions on how to adjust the contrast blind via the menu system out there somwhere. It probably worked fine.

      --
      every _exit() is the same, but every clone() is different.
    8. Re:Hmm... by Simulant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mine is somewhat flakey on low batteries also....(It is one of the first hardware revs) It also sometimes says "USB Active" and then powers off for no apparent reason. But it plays MP3s very well most of the time, is pretty much flawless as a USB hard drive and was more affordable than anything else at the time. (Still is, I think). I've abused my too.. I broke the backlight when I installed a 20gig drive and I can't even count how many times I've dropped it, usually on the concrete while getting out of my car. I still love it though! I would like a more stable version of essentially the same thing. Wish they sold them cheaper, without the drives. They could also use a redesign so it's easier to get the batteries in and out. Oh.. and of course fire wire would be great! Not so sure I want to watch video on it though.

    9. Re:Hmm... by MinusOne · · Score: 2

      Mine never skips when playing a playlist, even a list generated from a random selection of songs on the box. The only think that has made it skip much is when the MP3's are encoded at over 192Kbps. Also, you should check that you have the latest revision of the firmware downloaded off of their site. Of course it could be that when I hacked mine the 30GB drive I put in has a much better data throughput than the original 6GB drive.

    10. Re:Hmm... by mrsalty · · Score: 1

      Your experiance is the opposite of mine. I purchased a Jukebox6000 in March and have never had any problems. perhaps i am the fluke?

      --
      -- Hail Eris
    11. Re:Hmm... by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

      It will skip if the drive is fragmented.

      Using a Defragging tool on the drive should help stop the skipping, and a new charge / new batteries should help as well.

      --
      --arcades
  5. Sounds nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds great and all, but how much and when can I buy one?

  6. Re:whatever by NickV · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Wow, talk about a nasty goatse.cx bomb. Everybody, don't click that link!

  7. Another frozen interface PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet there's a general purpose processor inside of these thingies doing all of the neat stuff. They have to pretend that it's a special purpose device, so as not to scare customers. What a shame.

  8. I really don't get it... by Daniel+Wood · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why do people even want to bother with this kind of thing? A simple video in board and some PVR software on a Shuttle FV24 with an additional remote would be a much better solution.

    Perhaps its just that geeks prefer to hack things apart more than hacking them together?

    1. Re:I really don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which video in board and PVR software would you recommend?

      And can I do this without a TV? I have a TV, but it's in another room... which TV tuner card would you recommend?

      Of course, I mean for Linux or *BSD.

      Does this Shuttle MB have IR on board?

  9. Not just another gadget by Bi()hazard · · Score: 0, Troll

    We've seen a lot of portable mp3 player announcements on slashdot, some of these totally undeserving of front page status. However, don't dismiss this article as another one: this is a different situation. The new Jukebox isn't an mp3 player, it's a replacement for a variety of gadgets and a major breakthrough in consumer technology. With MPEG4, MP3, WMA, a built in color screen, digital photos, TV input, and fast firewire the Jukebox 6000 is the all in one media solution-a camera, camcorder, TiVo, mp3 player, and portable storage device in one. No other device has ever attempted such an ambitious set of functionality, and this thing appears to pull it off. I can't wait to get my hands on one, this is clearly a revolution, and the wave of the future. Very definately "stuff that matters."

    1. Re:Not just another gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be serious.

      First, this is a marketing ploy designed to stop some of the bleeding imposed on their sales by the iPod.

      Second, with no mention of price, it's clear they have not yet finalized the specs. It will not be cheap, if it ever actually hits the market, and it will not be light weight. It will eat batteries like Fritos.

      The market has shown that combo gadgets that try to do everything, end up not doing anything well.

      Consumers want their devices to function without compromise, otherwise they end up on the shelf. This thing is a tribute to compromise.

      The only breakthru will be to your wallet, as it digs a hole and leaves you with regret.

    2. Re:Not just another gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crap! trolling isn't as easy as it used to be. maybe ill have to start reading the articles first. :P or maybe just go back to posting goatsex...

  10. Redundant, AND copied without attribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you took even the briefest moment to visit the site before trying to get 'fp props' or something, you would have been able to read that the unit has a 10 hour playback on one charge.

    It's not clear what this was 10 hours of playing, eg, is it the same for video versus music?

    1. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by OmegaDan · · Score: 3, Informative

      ummm, I own the arhcos jukebox 6000, and I can tell you that the "6 hour battery life" they claim is more like 2 or 3... the device also seems to have a mind of its own -- some days I get 5 hours, some days I get 2, on the same charge time.

      keep that in mind when you think about "10 hours"...

    2. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by NickV · · Score: 1

      Umm... if you've ever used an Archos device or ever read any battery marketing bullshit before hand you'd realize that those claims are NEVER true. Do you get 6 hours of battery life playing a DVD on your laptop? I don't think so.

      Do you really think you'd even get more than 1 or 2 hours from record a video stream into mpeg-4 with 4 NiMH batteries? Yes I did read the release throughly... this wasn't some FP crap.

    3. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by MstrFool · · Score: 2, Informative

      I get 6 to 8 hours on the 2nd set I got from them. They put out word that the had some bad batteries and to call them for an RPL, took all of about 5 mins total, then a few days for them to get here. and if you don't like the life the get some better batteries, use some 1800 maH NIMs, they realy bring up the life and will charge fine in the unit.

      --
      Question reality.
    4. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't that be false advertising?

      I bought a piece of crap Teac CD-RW that advertised a two megabyte buffer, but 768k of that buffer is used for firmware! That leaves me with about 1.2MB to use, and I don't even have the luxury of burn-proof. Teac sucks royally these days. I remember when Teac used to make good, high quality stuff.

      Maybe we should start prosecuting the companies who pull this shit with us.

    5. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by ma2tias · · Score: 1

      I want to point out that the batteries are not called NIM, but NiMH (NickelMetalHybride) and the unit of the capacity usually used is mAh not maH.

      Also when is comes to batteries. It is important to take good care of them. Strictly follow the recharging intructions.

    6. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by Digitalia · · Score: 1

      Ummmm, I own an Archos Jukebox, and I can tell you that the "8 hour battery life" they claim is more like 9 or 10... The device also seems to act relatively consistently, with a standard deviation of no more than 1 hour. Perhaps it's time you switched to that second set of batteries they sent with the jukebox. After all, if the batteries are fucked, then you aren't going to get the full potential out of them.

      --
      Pax Digitalia
    7. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by a+nanny+mouse · · Score: 0
      Okay Senor Battery,

      I want to point out that first of all that you are obviously extremely intelligent and an excellent observer for noticing and pointing out those possibly life-threatening errors. However the expansion of "NiMH" is actually spelled NickelMetalHydride not NickelMetalHybride as you have erroneously attempted to explain. Thank you again.

    8. Re:Invest 30 seconds to visit the site by ma2tias · · Score: 1

      Point taken.

  12. I don't know if anyone else noticed tis, but.. by jx100 · · Score: 4, Informative

    for some reason it lists the specs for the Archos Jukebox at the bottom, not the Archos Jukebox Multimedia

    I mean:
    "Capacity: 6GB Low Voltage Hard Drive "?

    "Display: Graphic Backlit LCD (Up to 8 lines of characters)"?

    1. Re:I don't know if anyone else noticed tis, but.. by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2

      I was wondering why the top half of the article said a 10 gig drive, and the bottom half kept saying 6 gig. thank you for clearing up why!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
  13. MPEG4 support? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 0

    It doesn't give much info on the MPEG4 support; I suppose Microsoft already has MPEG4 support (I don't know, I've never tried it, and I don't count DiVX and the ilk as proper MPEG4) but what Mac MPEG4 support?

    Unless they know something about Quicktime and MPEG4 that I don't, I guess.

    Has anyone seen anything about MPEG4 support in Quicktime?

    It is nice that the article mentions FireWire support, but I wasn't able to gather what that meant, since it was 'optional'

    1. Re:MPEG4 support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QuickTime just celebrated 10 yrs...MPEG 4 support is up next. Look for this and other 'news' from Mac Expo SF, in January '02.

      Also, big hd's will no longer be a mandate for digital editing...no longer a factor. Makes you wonder if the iPod will really need one, eh? Maybe Apple planned ahead?

    2. Re:MPEG4 support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Has anyone seen anything about MPEG4 support in Quicktime?

      Yeah - here.

  14. Trends in players and portables/desktops by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Players getting more and more complex
    More portable desktops (LCD iMac)

    It ought to be rather interesting when these 2 trends run into each other.... the digital home appliance, maybe?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  15. OMG the batteries!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The major problem with products like these is the battery life is going to suck royally. My iPaq uses a high end Lithium Polymer battery, and I still only get about 8 hours of battery life... and that's not even doing something too intensive like playing mp3s or watching movies.

    Can you imagine the processor needed to decode mpeg4 on the fly? Can you imagine the processor needed to RECORD mpeg4 on the fly? Can you imagine how long this processor will run on 4 Rechargable NiMH AA batteries?

  16. Obligatory Beowulf Post by Lunastorm · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    --
    You die too easily.
    1. Re:Obligatory Beowulf Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey lunastorm, you won't be posting at +1 for very long if you only post crap.

    2. Re:Obligatory Beowulf Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why must someone always say that? If /. ran a story on ticklemeelmo, some idiot says "Beowulf!" or "Apacha Enable it!"

    3. Re:Obligatory Beowulf Post by Bi()hazard · · Score: 1
      Why must someone always say that? If /. ran a story on ticklemeelmo, some idiot says "Beowulf!" or "Apacha Enable it!"

      Actually, we'd demand that it use embedded linux for real time voice synthesis. ;)

  17. ..but not this year...if ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due Q1 2002....and no mention of price.

    This is obviously a marketing ploy, and a sign they have been hit hard by the release of the iPod. The specs on this thing will be in flux for months, and it could never really see the light of day. Archos is playing catch up...isn't that cool :)

    Is there some reason you didn't link to the Archos site instead?

    Where they talk about future products?

    This thing will be high price and high weight and low battery life....it's already a dead duck.

    Too bad Apple has already left the building.

  18. Use as a digital wallet for photos by Jonavin · · Score: 1

    I surprised nobody has meantioned its use as a digital wallet.

    Now there are many options available these days including THE Mind@Works Digital Wallet(tm), Terapin Mine, Nixvue Digital Album, etc...

    This is actually the first product I've seen that allows you to view the pictures on the LCD. Plus the fact that there are other uses makes it handy when you're not using it as a digital wallet for your photos while travelling.

    Depending on price and availability, this may be one option I will consider for my 3 week digital photo storage needs.

  19. The Nikon digital wallet for photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nikon Coolgear Photo Wallet...$299.00.

    If you need something along these lines, this is the only way to go.

    1. Re:The Nikon digital wallet for photos by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      This product only displays photos. It doesn't solve the primary requirement as an alternative mass digital storage to expensive flash cards or microdrives.

    2. Re:The Nikon digital wallet for photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it was mentioned in response to the sub-thread of 'wallet', where there is no 'requirement for alternative mass storage'...that's your requirement. Feel free to start a new thread if you want to go that way.

      How many photos do you carry in your wallet? Every photo you own? Of course not, that's not the idea.

      You take some out and you put some in...cars, girlfriends and wives...they come and they go.

      And saying that flash cards or microdrives are expensive is a consumer comment, not a technical argurment. I can afford them.

      I for one, don't have a problem with flash cards or their cost. They serve a purpose, and are reliable. I have several, from 16 to 64mb, not counting Memory Sticks. As long as I can read them, I'll use them.

    3. Re:The Nikon digital wallet for photos by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      I may not have been clear about my point.

      64mb doesn't hold too many 3 megapixel photos in RAW format, never mind the short videos that I will be taking. How many photos do you think you can shoot in 3 weeks? If you don't want to lug a round laptop for 3 weeks a storage wallet would be the best bet.

      I need at least 3GB by my estimates (based on previous trips) before I return home and get a chance to transfer the data to my computer, edit and make CDR archives. And what happens when I upgrade to a better camera that does 5mp RAW files?

      It not just about price. Why would you buy 20GB of flash card when most of the time you only need 512MB for day to day use? It's much more sensible to buy a storage device for thos elong trips. And in the case of this device, there are other uses when you're not using it as a photo storage wallet.

    4. Re:The Nikon digital wallet for photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Storage wallet..got it...take a look at this from Formac...might just be the ticket.

      studio DV/TVR

      I use a Palm IIIC and a Palm m505 as 'image wallets'. I can store images on the card in the slot on the m505, 64mb, as an example, and both work as small digital picture frames, with slideshows, etc. IR lets me move images between units, if that's needed, and both have snap on cameras. Not anywhere near the megapixel range you quote, but as they say, any picture is worth 1k words.

  20. Darn it looks good... Now, can we program for it?? by Abwh · · Score: 1

    I just bought the Terapin Mine... now this??

    Is the pcmcia port able to use lan or wireless cards or what??? Although firewire looks sweet, now I would REALLY have a pretext to buy a mini-DV camera too! Wheee!!

    That's the best thing about the Mine that I liked... forget USB, do your transfers over ethernet. That, and Terapin is getting ready their SDK for the linux kernel inside... Hopefully Archos could do something like that, let's say, we add support for Ogg Vorbis on this thing??? Hopefully it will have a generic CPU and not a bunch on dedicated chips that we can't mess with.

    --
    Gerry -- #include "ea!.h"
  21. Yeah it looks cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but can it play my copy protected cds? ;)

  22. official site by pneuma_66 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As i was reading the article, i thought the item was a fake (all those badly rendered images), so i went to archos's site and here is the official page on the device. however, it still sounds like vapor to me.

  23. ...more than the 10GB drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps not, when you take a look at the digital video advances coming out of Apple....

    "The other key function in FCP 3 is the addition of a new QuickTime codec called OfflineRT. With it, users can transcode DV, SD or HD footage (in real-time) in the Photo JPEG format for timecode-accurate, low-resolution offline work. While you can normally store five minutes of video per gigabyte in DV format, Photo JPEG allows for 40 minutes of video in the same space. This makes is possible to edit clips offline -- with a PowerBook G4 on an airplane, for example -- with a fraction of the hard disk space needed for DV.

    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0112/04.keyn ot e.php

    And we still have Mac Expo in January to look forward to...

  24. Vapor, as in one steamed off little company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's certainly vapor....and it's coming off of their marketing department that was recently steamrolled into a wet spot by Apple Computer :)

    Combo's do many things, poorly. Add in the battery overhead, and the cost of all the options, and this thing will die before it hits the mold.

    Archos is simply trying to keep it's name in the press so it can sell off all that USB equipped hardware before they close up shop.

  25. Compliment to PVR? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    I really like this idea. I want to be able to watch my SnapStream (www.snapstream.com) captured TV shows on the go. Right now I lug a laptop around, but with the new airline security restrictions lately I'm worried one day I won't be able to do that anymore. If this little device can play back my shows, then I would be ecstatic!

    In second place, I'd take a product that's a laptop hard-drive connected via Compact Flash card to my PocketPC. It's two components to carry instead of one, but man it'd be cool to catch up on Farscape since I'm never home to watch it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  26. Burn-proof is an unnecessary feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What do you need the burn-proof for?

    Stop using Windows and you'll never need it.

  27. Boo on the batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The major problem with products like these is the battery life is going to suck royally. My iCaq uses a high end Lithium Polymer battery, and I still only get about 37 hours of battery life... and that's not even doing something too intensive like playing mp2s or watching goat pr0n.

    Can you imagine the processor needed to decode mpeg4 on the fly? Can you imagine the processor needed to RECORD your mom's teeth on my fly? Can you imagine how long this processor will run on 4 Rechargable NiMH DD batteries?

  28. umm what? by crayz · · Score: 1

    Consumer Reports has a policy of only testing products that are shipping and that it buys in a store. It doesn't take pre-release stuff, and it doesn't take stuff sent directly from the manufacturer.

  29. Is that real? by Fishy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Is it just me or do some of those attachments look like concept drawings, not actual hardware.

  30. misunderstanding by crayz · · Score: 1

    That is not the purpose of OfflineRT as I understand it. What OfflineRT is made for is to let someone take the DV stream, compress it down to something small(but with much poorer quality), and edit it. Then, once all the editing is done, you then go back to the uncompressed stream and using FCP it edits the large file based on what you did with the small one.

    It's made so that for instance you can take the 200GB of movie data you have and put it on your TiBook for editing, then resync it with the main piece of data. You don't want to store your original in that format because it'll look like shit.

  31. CIF format by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    In video processin CIF ussually refers to the "Common Image Format" = 352 H x 288 Vertical, this is a CCITT standard, which is neither NTSC or PAL compatible, as ussual. VHS resolution is roughly 320x240 so this would be about as much data as you could support anyway, too small for desktop playback but this LCD is about that size. There is also 4CIF = 704 x 576 and QuarterCIF (QCIF) = 176 x 144.

    1. Re:CIF format by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, NTSC has 480 lines, but this in interlaced analog signal at 30Hz frame (60 fields), if 480 was the simple answer VHS would look as good as DVD, it doesn't becasue the effective resolution is much lower. Something like 320 x240, different VHS tapes will have different effective resolutions, and the ability to define a digital resolution from an analog video is purely subjective. There are numerous tricks present in NTSC to reduce the data (bandwidth) required to get minimally acceptable video. The original RCA engineers working on the TV standard, decided on 24Hz video, to match the movie industry, then as geeks often try to do, showed thier new invention off to the women in the office who asked, why the image flicked so much. The male engineers, don't notice the flicker, but women have higher perception to flicker so the frame rate was bumped from 24 to 30Hz. Interlacing is abou the worst thing you can do image quality but it does trick the eye into beleiving the image is better than it really is. Effective resolution is performed on static images, but there has been much recent work on the brains ability to interpolate between, images to significantly bump up the perceived resolution and it has been shown that with jitter of the sensor, a 256x256 sensor can generate a 1Kx1K quality image through interpolation over multiple images, jitter by fractional pixels amounts. So there are 480 lines but that has nothing to do with resolution, your computer is digital so lines = resolution, and even more so with LCD, but in TV its all perception.

  32. Re:no misunderstanding by crayz · · Score: 1

    How big will DVD's get before it's no longer practical to decode all that data...why not focus on reducing the data, and not have to design hardware that can handle excessive loads?

    There is no sensible answer to that question. As processor speeds and efficiency rise along with other technologies DVDs could get much bigger. Using better codecs can help, but only so much. If someone can make a 100GB DVD, and someone else can make a player that can play it, then what's the problem?

    You say you want storage needs for digital video down so that you don't need a large drive. Fine. Use a low bitrate and get a shitty picture. Or wait a few years until 500GB drives are available and a relatively small drive will be able to store a lot of high quality video. The word "large" is nearly meaningless when referring to a drive. The fact is that once drive sizes increase, the resolution DV cams use probably will too. But that's a good thing. In 50 years no one will probably think a thing of throwing around petabyte size files. I see that as progress.

  33. Apple working on this, too by PatSmarty · · Score: 1

    Word on the street is that Apple is working on a similar device: Video, Windows Compatibility on Tap for iPod

    1. Re:Apple working on this, too by NetFu · · Score: 1

      There's always word-on-the-street that Apple is working on something users want -- don't believe it until you see it AND can buy it. There have been too many rumors in the past that some idiot got out of some Apple employee by getting them drunk at a popular restaurant near Apple's HQ.

      Sure, Apple works on a lot of stuff and a lot of employees know about and work on that stuff personally, but whether or not that stuff ever makes it to market is always a HUGE "if" with Apple...

  34. is that some pr0n in your pocket? by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

    or are you just happy to see me?

    if this think plays Divx that would be sweet.

  35. Digital home appliances. by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    Your analysis is interesting. However, I don't think there will be one digital home appliance, just as there isn't one kitchen appliance. There will be many, and unfortunately from the ones in existence (Gamecube, iPod, Palms) they will be proprietary and non-upgradable.

  36. MP3 Recorder bugs by ctmacgyver1 · · Score: 1

    As an early purchaser of the Archos MP3 Recorder I have found that Archos has not completed the work on the MP3 Recorder (common these days) and if this carries over consumers would be advised to wait until the Video version has had plenty of "break in time" so Archos fixes many of the bugs.

    1. MP3 recorder powers off regularly when used in a car. My guess is that vibration is a factor, but even after adding much padding to the protected placement the unit is virtually unusable in a car. (I am talking 2002 model not a 49 chevy :-) )

    2. The firmware needs more revision as it is plagued by odd display bugs and other anomalies. These do not affect performance, but do impact the user experience. Powering off and back on will clear the display.

    3. Better documentation would be a nicety :-)

    4. Realize that the 10 hours claimed does not mean while the device is transfering files to/from pc. Better have that puppy plugged in or it will be drained in no time. (current draw is greater by HD under continual use blah blah blah... but they need to document that)

    Overall I love the MP3 Recorder and will be looking forward to reviews of the Video Recorder.

  37. Hard Drive Attachment by airos4 · · Score: 1

    Here's something that I've not heard mentioned at all - does anyone make or plan to make some sort of a module that could connect to either a laptop HD or a standard IDE drive, and let you play media files on it? With drive prices as cheap as they are, I'd be pretty happy with having something that clipped onto a normal, full size IDE drive and played the media files contained within. Then, you could unclip that module and plug it back into your home IDE channel in your system to transfer files, etc.

    --
    I wish there was a choice that said "Factually Wrong -1" when I mod.
  38. Not the exception by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    I have personally had miserable experiences with the Archos MP3 recorder. I am still awaiting shipment of my #4, after a poor history.

    I purchased directly from Archos.

    #1: Charging Jack on the unit was loose and finally shorted completely. Took Archos a month to get on the ball and issue an RMA.

    #2: Badly beaten refurb was sent out. HD errors out the wazoo, caused a bus storm if hooked to the computer.

    #3: Slightly bruised refurb. Played for 5 minutes (exactly) and locked up. Every time.

    Aside from the poor reliability, the jukeboxes have problems with large directories, playlists, etc. The random function can only be applied to one directory, and has a poor randomizing algorhythm.

    Example: My daughter's christening, I filled a directory with 300 songs and put them on random. The jukebox would play one song and then choke on the directory while looking for the next random song to play.

    Recording is VBR ONLY, and I often had trouble with recorded tracks playing back.

    Archos will be toast if they ever get some real competition. But heck, that's what I said about Microsoft.

    ~Hammy
    nothing4sale.org

  39. Re:QUIT FUCKING SAYIING "UMMMM..." by Digitalia · · Score: 1

    Ummm, I was mocking the preceeding "ummmm" used by the other guy.

    --
    Pax Digitalia