Slashdot Mirror


Linux PDA Part Deux

PolarCow writes: "Everyone's favorite Linux powered PDA retailer is back. Empower Technologies/LinuxDA are releasing a new variant of Linux-powered PDA. The new one is called the PowerPlay V. Its hardware is comparable to that of the Palm Vx. Thin, rechargable and with an enhanced display. I'm salivating already."

101 comments

  1. What the hell is this? by PopeAlien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..From the product info page:

    DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

    ?

    1. Re:What the hell is this? by nesthigh · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that you'd only need to make a ppp connection over the serial port to backup your data via scp/ftp/rsync/etc.. Hopefully there [are|will be] some tools to manipulate the databases similar to the pilot-link tools.

      next

    2. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

      We lost the war.
      Like the VHS and Beta war, Beta have the best feature but they lost the war.
      Linux it's easyer and have the best feature, but with can't battle for our self. We construct linux products whom work only in the windows environnement. Doh
      We are stupid

    3. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No w4y, d00d, don't j00 kn0w th4t 4nyth1ng w1th LUNIX is uber-1337?????

      STFU L4M3R.

    4. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: 0

      windows users are the ones who have money for gadgets like handheld pc's. Linux users use mostly free software, that should tell you something about their financial situation.

    5. Re:What the hell is this? by hacker · · Score: 1
      windows users are the ones who have money for gadgets like handheld pc's. Linux users use mostly free software, that should tell you something about their financial situation.
      Quite the opposite in fact. Linux users and developers have much more "spare" cash than Windows developers and users because we use Free Software. We are paid more as developers than equivalent Microsoft developers, we work harder, and we can afford our expensive toys, because we're not spending thousands of dollars on Microsoft restrictive licensing agreements.
    6. Re:What the hell is this? by karouser · · Score: 1

      I have a linuxDA Powerplay III myself, I found that by using wine against "Winders" dll's and it works fine from my mandrake 8.1 desktop a little slow and small ( my res is 1280 x 1084) but definetly usable and there is a sdk available on their site if you want to make something your self

      p.s. I like mine and carry it around all the time

      --
      Cut! Slash! Hack!
    7. Re:What the hell is this? by njdj · · Score: 1

      DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform

      But also on the product info page, they offer to sell you a CD with the source code of the device, for $20. OK, so one of us will have to do some work, but at least this is an open-source product - there is no proprietary protocol to reverse engineer.

    8. Re:What the hell is this? by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0

      I have the powerplayIII too, the sync software didnt even work on win98! They asked me if my comports worked.......duh! I kinda like it but rechargeable batteries would make it better and if i could syncit......would be nice to use the ebook feature.

      --
      The Arkie Libertarian
    9. Re:What the hell is this? by karouser · · Score: 1

      I have installed it twice on 98 machine's with no problems and am using there sync software on my Mandrake 8.1 desktop now I am using winex and directorie copies from 98 machine

      --
      Cut! Slash! Hack!
  2. maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    why does the Slashdot crowd get so excited when some random gadget runs Linux? do people think it has the same features as the i386 version?

    an i386 OS (like Windows or Linux) needs to be crippled all over the place before it will run on a PDA or some similarly tiny device. why do people assume that the best OS for the server/desktop is the best OS for the PDA?

    i'd rather have a ground-up PDA OS, myself. it's not like you can usefully share code between PDA Linux and regular Linux anyway.

    1. Re:maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by gmplague · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Scalability! It's really exciting to see that Linux can be scaled down to reliably run on something like this. It's really neat that an OS can be written to run on 15mhz hardware with 8 megs of ram or a 60 ghz beowulf cluster with terabytes of ram.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    2. Re:maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by krog · · Score: 1

      Scalability! It's really exciting to see that Linux can be scaled down to reliably run on something like this.

      first of all, it's not that exciting, considering modern PDAs are almost as powerful the 386s on/for which Linux was designed.

      second of all, are you running services on your PDA? no, you're running apps. Linux excels at serving and is (sorry, everyone) dead last at usability. why port your problems to the PDA when you could start from scratch?

    3. Re:maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by Trelane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is the Linux kernel dead last at usability? After all Linux only refers to the kernel. The "usability" you probably are referring to is the GUI that the user sees.

      My friend, that is not Linux. Linux is the kernel. The fluff that you use to interact with the kernel is the operating environment, to borrow from Sun's terminology. It's the distribution that the user sees. While you can whine about the "usability" of various distros, it is really a matter of taste. I like the command line. Many do not. For me, Debian is the distribution. For a Windows user looking around, I'd recommend Red Hat or especially Mandrake, since they are very much GUI-oriented. Seeing the RH7 installer made me very happy, since I could finally show the Windows users something they could relate to. For some reason, block graphics turn people off faster than, well, some very fast things.

      Linux is not just for servers. I've run it successfully on several desktops and my laptop. It's just what I could ask for. It can be point-and-drool if you want. It can be all command-line if you want. I'd say that it has better usability than some *ahem* other Operating Environments out there, since it gives you a choice and makes both of them just as good as the other. You're not herded into anything.

      Anywho, the point is wake up. Linux isn't just for geeks anymore. Anyone who would tell you otherwise is probably trying to sell you something (e.g. XP)

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by aardvaark · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reality check: The source code for modern linux probably doesn't share but a couple lines of code from the 386 designed days. Nowadays Linux is designed for running on many, many different platforms, and definitely not for a 386s. Its designed to be flexible and scalable.

      Second: If you "start from scratch" you are destined to repeat many mistakes. It is smart to leverage existing source code if it can be adapted to your uses. Due to Linux's design (see first paragraph), it can be used in PDAs, and is therefore a viable and attractive solution. Other larger copmpanies use Linux in PDAs (such as Sharp and Compaq), do you think they are stupid too?

      As far as usability, that doesn't have a damn thing to do with the kernel, that has to do with the applications in the user space. Each PDA company would have to write most of their own anyway (beside using Opera for instance, which is better than IE for PDAs actually), so you can make them plenty usable.

      --
      If I had no sense of humor, I would long ago have committed suicide. -Ghandi
    5. Re:maybe the best server OS is not the best PDA OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where you're wrong.

      The embedded version of Linux DOES have most features in common with the regular version.

      Your similar "tiny devices" often run on 225 MHz ARM processors and have 16 megs of RAM. That's more than enough to run Linux confortably.

      What the hell were you thinking when you wrote your comment?

  3. Problems with PDAs, Linux or not by wackybrit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think PDAs are a great idea, and that everyone should have one. But PDAs have a number of flaws.

    1) If everyone is meant to have one, surely it should act as some sort of communications device too? Manufacturers are starting to pick up on this with phone/PDA devices such as the Nokia Communicator or Cybiko, but more effort should be put into this area of the market rather than just the OS.

    2) Bring prices down! I really can't understand the prices of PDAs, and that's why I don't have one. For a tiny thing with a color screen and 16MB of RAM they expect me to pay $300? Nuts.

    Perhaps Linux will help slash the prices, but do the OS and applications really suck up most of the $300? I doubt it. In fact, I'd imagine most of the costs of the typical PDA are thanks to giant R&D budgets and weird non standard components. Not to mention those expensive screens..

    Using Linux in an embedded setting is a start. But until we have a reasonably well functioned PDA for under $99, the majority of the population will not own one. And nor will I.

    1. Re:Problems with PDAs, Linux or not by darkov · · Score: 2

      Along the same lines, I wish they would make mobile phones more like organisers. I don't mean like the Nokia Communicatior. It's way too big. My Nokia 8210 (GSM) is the right size, but I wish it had more memory and organiser features. If only phones were like PCs - hackable.

    2. Re:Problems with PDAs, Linux or not by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      >2) Bring prices down! I really can't understand the prices of PDAs, and that's why I don't have one. For a tiny thing with a color screen and 16MB of RAM they expect me to pay $300? Nuts.

      Best Buy recently had HP Jornada 525's for $149. (256 color, ~150 Mhz SuperH3 processor, runs PocketPC stuff) Only 16 megs of ram, but you can get 256m online for around $80, makes one nice (and cheap) mp3 player!

    3. Re:Problems with PDAs, Linux or not by Morel · · Score: 1

      You want communication? Drool over this:

      http://www.plantronics.com/bluetooth/products.ht ml

      Morel

    4. Re:Problems with PDAs, Linux or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palm m100's are under $100 all over the place. Excellent price for a fully functional unit, as long as you aren't trying to extend its functionality further than it was intended to go (a mp3 player / portable video device / corporate file server...sheesh...).

  4. Re:Can you make... by gmplague · · Score: 1

    You can... but who the hell would want to? Buy a bunch of used pentiums or 486s from your local computer shop for a third of the price, and you've got something that not even 30 of these running together would do.

    --
    __________________________________________
    Take comfort in your ignorance.
    Grandmaster Plague
  5. Re:CRAP!!! by gmplague · · Score: 1

    At 99 dollars, I've got cash to blow to be the first on the block to get a cool gadget. If it sucks, I'll sell it to some jackoff like myself on e-bay for 85 plus 20 shipping.

    --
    __________________________________________
    Take comfort in your ignorance.
    Grandmaster Plague
  6. Here's the picture! But is this any different... by Tsar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From simply running Linux/DA on a Palm V or Vx?

    This page has good pix and stats for the PowerPlay V, though they're all CG. So does this thing really exist, and if so, why? Why not simply load Linux DA O/S for Palm onto a Palm Vx and get all the benefits of a Linux palmtop, including Windows-only desktop synchronization?

    Don't get me wrong—this all looks interesting, but if it's going to be based on cloned last-generation-Palm hardware, and it won't work with a Linux desktop, why is it important or appealing to anyone?

  7. A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...Linux connectivity.

    Every PDA I've seen until now, comes with connectivity to MS Outlook on MS Windows, but none (including the Linux-based ones) come with connectivity to KArm and Kab.

    Although I welcome Linux on PDAs, I think it's not really the major issue at hand. What we need is connectivity to KDE.

    1. Re:A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Palm IIIx has synched in Linux to Gnome for more than a year now..

      Indeed, there are other projects for Palm synching in Linux for KDE and the console.

    2. Re:A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Part of the open source idea is that you do it yourself, or within a collective of like minded indviduals who share information freely..

      What are you doing to further that?

    3. Re:A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by premchai21 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, there is connectivity to GNOME for Palms; GNOME includes a Palm Pilot conduit to gnomecal, gnomecard, file system, and sendmail (among other things).

      Of course, I don't have a PDA, so I haven't experienced this firsthand, but it seems to me that it shouldn't be extremely difficult to sync Palm with GNOME, and sync GNOME with KDE, assuming reasonably interchangeable formats.

      I'm not sure what the situation would be in the case of PDAs running GNU/Linux... it might be possible for them to run a light version of whatever normal desktop apps are being used (much as is the case with Windows PDAs), which would make interfacing with the desktop much easier. Or do they already do that?

    4. Re:A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by tmuka · · Score: 1

      I am happy to report that I DO CURRENTLY sync my palm IIIxe with the Kab (KDE address book) using kpilot provided with KDE since version 2 i believe. It is very functionaland adaptable. The documentation even caters to those wishing to create thier own conduits and interfaces.

      I also use pilot-link for very convenient command line interaction with my palm.

      I could be biased, but i these linux tools for palm transfers much more powerful than their windows counterparts!

    5. Re:A Linux-PDA is useless for me without... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Hear hear. And, while you're at it, build in sync support for Mac OS X--which technically should be in the same ballpark.

      With PocketMac it looks like I'm going to be able to sync mail from OS X sooner on a WinCE device than on either Palm or a Linux PDA, and that's just plain wrong.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  8. The best I've ever owned by Daath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is the one I have now, the Psion Revo - Of course it's not linux, nor WinCE - It's EPOC - an OS made for small devices - The revo is the best I've EVER tried - I've had three palmtops, and I've tried the HP jornada handheld (too big) - the Revo is just right. The fact that it has a keyboard makes the difference (I know the HP has too, but the device is too bulky).
    It's about 200 US$
    If I need to do linux stuff on it, I just use VNC for EPOC (get it here (downloads - bottom).
    Ok, the sync could be better, but you can't have it all.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:The best I've ever owned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, that's like a first generation PDA you're talking about.

      Linux on a PDA makes development much easier and gives you a REAL computer inside a little box.

      Your Revo is nothing more than an electronic notebook, and in this article we're talking about real computers.

    2. Re:The best I've ever owned by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      "in this article we're talking about real computers."

      - huh? I thought this was a PDA.
      - 16MHz
      - 8MB
      - grey display
      - "*actual unit may not be exactly as shown"
      - "DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform"

      "real computers" this is not.

    3. Re:The best I've ever owned by hattig · · Score: 1
      Your Revo is nothing more than an electronic notebook, and in this article we're talking about real computers.

      Hmmm. Revo - a palmtop with a 36MHz CISC processor, 480x160 display and a wealth of applications.

      Whereas this article is about a 16MHz RISC processor based machine, 160x160 display and zero applications.

      Your definition of "real computer" has confused me. Whilst the LinuxDA device looks like a Palm without the apps, I would hardly call it a real computer.

      Development for EPOC is easy. I should say "Symbian" of course, the OS for the next generation of 2.5G and 3G devices, as decided by pretty much all of the industry already.

      The Psion 5/Revo were modern palmtops 3 years too early. They rock.

    4. Re:The best I've ever owned by rbeattie · · Score: 1

      Great... except that Psion is probably exiting the PDA biz.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    5. Re:The best I've ever owned by saihung · · Score: 1

      First generation? I switched from the Palm V to a Revo Plus, and never regretted it. I can emulate a Gameboy (or even a C64, for those who like extra irony on their pizza), I can use VNC, properly browse the web thanks to Opera and a real TCP/IP implementation, and just generally kick booty with all kinds of very spiffy built-in apps (a real Word-processor and excellent calendar app in particular). Now, who wants to talk about a real computer?

  9. Whoopie by labradore · · Score: 1
    Forgive me but even a Linux-based PDA doesn't really thrill me. Here's why I feel they're useless:

    1. Poor Input methods. It is annoying to try to write everything into it. What PDAs really need are voice recognition.
    2. Poor connectivity. No one wants to plug them in. They should communicate using RF. They need to have at least 50KB/s wireless bandwidth so that you can get real information when you need it.
    3. The batteries should last a lot longer. They should probably operate for a week between charges. 3 days might be acceptable.
    4. The screens are not readable enough. When it's 75dpi in full color then we're getting somewhere.
    All this obviates the need for faster processors and a much better cellular network. Obviously the PDAs should have built in phones and have a standard for exchanging data with everything from large databases on the Internet to other PDAs on the street. Until we get a lot closer to this point all PDAs should be called PDBCs: Personal, Digital, Ball & Chains.
    1. Re:Whoopie by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      try an ipaq it has all your looking for don't believe me look it up

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  10. Big Deal by mlknowle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still doesn't impress me; I'm not going to buy a linux PDA just because it is a linux PDA - until it does more, or at least untill it will sync with my Mac and my Linux box, it has no advantages over Palm OS.

    The reason I have a linux box is because it is the best for what I need it for; this same doctorine applies to PDAs; untill Linux PDAs DO SOMETHING better, I can't see them existing as anything other than a niche item

  11. Can someone explain what this means? by zook · · Score: 1
    So what if it runs linux? I mean this in a practical sense.

    What impact does this have in terms of the user experience and/or the developer experience? Does having it run linux make some applications easier to write, etc.?

    1. Re:Can someone explain what this means? by leandrod · · Score: 2

      Basically it means, system requirements like memory, processor power, I/O channels being available, it can compile and run any application created for not only GNU/Linux but any reasonably compliant POSIX-compatible API -- that goes from z/OS (ex-OS/390, ex-MVS/ESA) Unix services to Cygwin under Microsoft Windows.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    2. Re:Can someone explain what this means? by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      My humble opinion..

      You should hardly be able to tell at all that it runs linux from a (l)user end. If the device is correctly engineered, there isn't a reason to even advertise the thing as a linux device, except for to the developers. I hate to say this, but advertising a linux only PDA is going to scare a number of users away. If a company wants to attract main stream traffic (and thereby bring linux closer to the main stream), it must be seamlessly integrated into both the windows and linux worlds.

      Plus, the latest Zaurus is supposed to release in the usa in early 2002, and it's full color, linux based and has a whopping 206mhz strongarm proccesor.. and although many of you may not be big java fans, I am, and this suckers got a nice JVM built onto it, making aplication development not too difficult.

      http://www.sharp-usa.com/products/ModelLanding/0 ,1 058,699,00.html

  12. Very bad experience with Empower Technologies... by bc90021 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I ordered their Power Play III. They said it would take six to eight weeks to ship.

    They charged my credit card within one day.

    Eight weeks later, I still had not heard anything, after emailing them twice.

    Finally, they responded to my email, and told me that my PDA would ship on the 19th of November, and that it would take an additional week to arrive.

    They would not give me a tracking number, no matter how many times I emailed.

    After the week was up, the PDA had still not arrived. I waited another three days, and still nothing.

    In the meantime, I had ordered the Sharp Zaurus SL-5000D, and I got it in eight days.

    I therefore wrote to the sales and info people at Empower Technologies, and I told them that I no longer wanted the PowerPlay III. They said they would issue me a refund, and since FedEx *still* had not delivered the PowerPlay III, that they would have FedEx return it directly to them and then issue me a refund.

    A day later, and two days after I got my SL-5000D, FedEx delivered it. I checked the Tracking Number to see that FedEx had delivered it somewhere else first, but apparently Empower didn't see fit to check that.

    So now I had a PowerPlay III that I no longer wanted, after being assured that Empower would have it directed back to them.

    I wrote them again, and they said *I* was responsible for shipping it back to them. Furthermore, I was to insure it, and then give them a tracking number!! Needless to say, I was rather upset (since they wouldn't give me one), and wrote them a nice but firm email. They changed their tune, and then told me that I would get "reimbursed" for the shipping.

    The next day, a FedEx guy showed up at my house (I was at work) to pick up the PowerPlay. Empower had called FedEx for a pick up order, but they did not tell me first!! Since I was at work, the package wasn't ready.

    Then they said they would have FedEx pick it up again. The package stayed between my doors waiting for FedEx to return for another week. They never did.

    Finally, I dropped it in a FedEx box, and it was redelivered to me. I got very upset at that point, and wrote to Empower that they had better call for FedEx pick up, and have them meet me. They have finally done that, and as of this morning, the package is on its way back to Empower. I checked "Bill To Sender" on the FedEx form, and the FedEx guy took it even though there was no account number.

    I have yet to see how long it will take to get my refund, but I am not holding my breath!!!

    In short, while more expensive, the Sharp Zaurus SL-5000D was a much better product, from a much more reliable company.

  13. What's the point? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    160x160 screen, 8MBs RAM, bigger than a Vx.
    Runs an OS that looks like a clone of PalmOS but without the ability to run palm apps. Sure it's open source. But do you really need that in a PDA?
    Only syncs with Win (even palm syncs with Mac and Win).

    Why even bother? These people seem to be showing even less innovation than Palm.
    I just cant see a resaon why anyone (except a small minorty) would want this. They could have atleast had a sceen like the Handera 330.
    *sigh*

    1. Re:What's the point? by javaaddikt · · Score: 1

      Well, already the ladies always notice my sleak visor edge and want to play with it, but imagine when they see me grepping and making--We're talkin' 100 Vestal virgins on a tropical island now

    2. Re:What's the point? by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0

      hell it didnt sync on win98 with mine either! I've heard of one other person have the same problem too.

      --
      The Arkie Libertarian
  14. Powerplay V versus Vtech Helio by Coolio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks very similar to the Vtech Helio in terms of memory (2MB flash, 8MB SDRAM) and display (160x160 greyscale). The Helio lacks IRDA, but makes up for it with a 75MHz RISC processor with proper MMU as opposed to the Powerplay's 16MHz DragonBall. The Helio can also run Linux, but comes preloaded with Vtechs own VT-OS.

    The Helio is also keenly priced. Brits can pick them up for £49.99 from the Carphone Warehouse, whilst you chaps across the pond can get them from a number of sources (often for less than $50, apparently).

  15. Do remember by tmontes · · Score: 0


    You don't want to know what kernel, OS, etc your PDA is running
    You just want it to "A" you in managing your "PD" !

  16. I have a question. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay. I've owned a palmpilot before.. I've used them.... and they work fine for what they were designed for.

    HEre's what I want to know...
    What sorts of cool things can anyone do with one of these power handhelds? ipaq, etc (I don't know many). What's the nerd incentive here? I mean, just running linux on a $500 device is pointless if it has no purpose.

    So.. I ask you, linux based or not, what cool shit can you do with a PDA nowadays? Let's hear some real examples.. not 'theoretically you could do blah blah'.

    1. Re:I have a question. by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Right now, I could really use a PDA for my new job, and probably not the job you would think. See, I'm a building inspector for a major entertainment arena. My job is to walk around and figure out what isn't right, write it down on a clip board and then enter the data in a spread sheet.

      Now, all in all, I'm pretty cool with walking aroung a huge facility (30+ acres!) and finding whats wrong, even though it's not the tech jobn of my dreams. However, I _hate_ to do data entry.

      With almost any pda, linux based or not, I could make my job easier and more effiecent by half. And I will.. as soon as I get and extra 125$ for a Handspring.

      Maybe it'll give me a reason to get cellular service as well.. anybody have comments about handsprings cellular/wireless internet components?

      josh

  17. GNU/Linux PDAs are important for standards... by DocSnyder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unlike WinCE and PalmOS, there is no single variant of GNU/Linux on PDAs, and the variety is more likely to increase than to consolidate. Some of them run X and a common widget library like Gtk+ or FLTK, some don't and run QT on the framebuffer. One distribution may use the large glibc 2.2, a different one uses a reduced micro-libc. Of course the PDAs run GNU/Linux on different architectures. Some might even choose BSD instead of Linux for the kernel, or not even a Unix-like OS.

    It's simply impossible for an ISV to provide off-the-shelf software for GNU/Linux PDAs of any kind. The user won't install a different widget library or even an X server to run the software. He won't install a statically-linked binary of several megabytes in size. A Java engine is still too large at least for the less powerful PDAs.

    No, he should only need to install the _content_ and use it with some kind of standardized application - an email client, a web browser, an addressbook, a PIM, a media player, even a geographical map viewer for GPS or navigation.

    Today it's sheer incredible how proprietary data formats and protocols have established especially on PDAs, without anyone complaining about it. Exchange data with a desktop PIM? Read a book? Store news from a Web site for offline reading? In any case you'll need a special proprietary application on either the PDA or your desktop (Windoze) PC, or even on both. And all you care about is content, as much as you want to read Slashdot or some other web sites instead of just playing with Mozilla, Galeon, Konqueror, IE, Opera or whatever your favorite Web browser would be.

    Fortunately since both PalmOS and WinCE have their market share and GNU/Linux PDAs beginning to appear, there is no single handheld platform with a market share large enough to ignore anything else. So hopefully content vendors will discover that they'll only reach a larger customer base by either providing proprietary data formats and closed-source applications for a dozen of systems, or by using free specifications for their data which can be used on independent applications.

    Therefore it's especially the lowest-end GNU/Linux PDAs which contribute to the need of standards. An iPAQ, a Yopy or a Zaurus could easily have two or three different toolkits installed. A VR3 or a LinuxDA certainly can't.

  18. Just an idea.... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I realize I would probably have had the same troubles as you.. but in hindsight.. would you not have been better off to simply refuse the fedex shipment? Or can you do that.

    1. Re:Just an idea.... by bc90021 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they delivered it while I was at work. The FedEx driver signed it as received by "Front Door". I did not get the opportunity to refuse the shipment.

  19. Linux on Vtech Helio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The links to get the Linux files for dt and the
    kernel/image don't work. Does anyone have a
    mirror or another source for them? I picked a
    helio up at Staples for $50, and would like to
    try to get it installed.

  20. Linux is the only free kernel for PDA by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 1
    why does the Slashdot crowd get so excited when some random gadget runs Linux? do people think it has the same features as the i386 version?

    There is no reason why an embedded system should not boot a Linux kernel. That's exciting for exactly the same reason that a 16MHz 386 desktop with 4MB RAM booting Linux 0.99 was exciting. There may be more appopriate systems for PDAs, but I believe that Linux is currently the only free kernel to run on PDAs.

  21. "Need" for open source in a PDA by Macrobat · · Score: 1
    In response to your point:

    Sure it's open source. But do you really need that in a PDA?
    --I can only say that, if you think Open Source is a valid methodology/philosophy/religion in the first place, then it applies to any software-running device, from the smallest to the greatest. Availability of source, freedom to modify and redistribute, and freedom from dependence on (often unreliable) software vendors to provide bug fixes are all valuable attributes that don't rely on economies of scale.
    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
    1. Re:"Need" for open source in a PDA by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      True true.

      I spose my point should have been more like this:

      Sure it's Linux which is open source. But do you really need linux on a PDA? Wouldn't you be better off creating an OS that was talored specifily as a PDA OS (which can still be an open source OS)?

    2. Re:"Need" for open source in a PDA by Macrobat · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, then, there you go.

      --
      "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  22. Re:"Need" for open source in a PDA--clarification by Macrobat · · Score: 1

    By "don't rely on economies of scale" I mean these benefits apply regardless of the size of code or system resources available. Not exactly the most precise or accurate terminology to use; mea culpa.

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  23. Re:Quake III Arena reveals severe Linux security b by theJavaMan · · Score: 0
    the very fact that this message is modded down as -1, instead of Offtopic makes me regret registering on this messageboard.

    You can mod me down to -9 but you can't hide the truth.

    Linux is an open source project that is poorly managed. Why? Because it is Open Sores. Eclipse on the other hand may be open source, but it is managed and developed solely by OTI people. How do I know that? Well, I went on the mailing list and I gave them a suggestion and they told me to fuck off and go to sourceforge.net. Why? Because a great thing like Eclipse cannot be developed by god knows who. OTI people know each other and are familiar with each other's coding style. If the god knows who starts to mess up the code or worse, the architecture, Eclipse will be as good as a 20 year old TV. Why does Eclipse need to be developed this way? Because it is a user friendly application and cannot be as fucked up as Linux(I say so because Linux crashed 5 times in one day and WinXP hasn't crashed even once. Security? get a damn Hardware firewall!). IBM did a very smart decision: They give Eclipse for free, but they sell WSAD for $3000. What do I conclude from my experience: Eclipse is 100% not OpenSores.

    Oh and don't forget: Open Source Software is not a fucking religion, it is just an alternative business model.

  24. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'm a huge Linux fan. I've been using it for years. It's on every machine that I own. I have one machine that dual boots with Windows 98 so that I can play games (yes, I have Wine running with full GL support but I still get better framerates under Windows). I also have a Palm Vx. I could not not be less impressed by this device. Who cares if it runs Linux? It looks like all they did was try and build a PalmOS clone from it. How crappy would Linux be if it's sole purpose was to mimic Windows? As mentioned above, you don't get Palm App support and these geniuses can't even create some Linux connectivity software. Not to mention that if you want to buy Linux DA stand-alone from these people you'll be charged as much as for Palm OS 4.1, but apparently without benefitting from any of it's features? Back to the drawing board guys.

  25. Re:Very bad experience with Empower Technologies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Luckily of course, you paid on your credit card, and thus you can contact your CC company and contest the payment, giving an account of what happened.

    Fact is, unless these LinuxDA devices costs under $99, and have a wealth of applications available for them, they are dead in the water. People want a lot more from a PDA than a glorified mobile phone without the phone capability these days!

  26. Jump... but don't forget the parachute by bluenirve · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm ok with this, but just wondering if this is like the last attempt they made (ads in Linux on their demo?).

  27. Re:Because Linux Sucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monkeys are almost as smart as regular humans. They even started a college fund to help them go to school. Soon they might be able to figure out how to vote.

  28. WinCE is out. by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    First of all, companies who charge an arm and a leg for thier devel apps are killing themselves. Mainly, it's MS who's doing this. The last I checked, thier WinCE devel platform was about $1000 .

    Go on haead, try and find free apps for it... All app makers HAVE to charge way bloated prices for thier programs.
    Josh Crawley

    1. Re:WinCE is out. by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Uh, no.

      Everything you need to customize WinCE for a portable device is available FREE OF CHARGE. This includes the source code for the entire OS and development tools. Only when a company is selling devices using the operating system must they pay anything.

      Beyond that, I've owned and used several WinCE devices and have used tons of free apps for them. Again, it is quite easy to create apps for WinCE because the development tools are free. And developers aren't charged royalties of any kind of distributing WinCE applications.

      I give your post a -1,Ignorant.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  29. What is so great about PDAs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, what is all the hype about? Sure, I can see a few uses for a certain minority. But I can hardly find anything that is useful or even remotely interesting to me. There is absolutely no cool factor...

  30. Re:Very bad experience with Empower Technologies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, I'm glad you live in a dream world where this WORKS. They won't even consider letting you contest payment for this. I work for Chase's card member services, I've seen so many people try to pull this. The fact is, if you order something, as long as you get it, and it is what you ordered, you're paying for it. It doesn't matter if it took a year, you have it now. Any issues you have with returning it are now your responsibility, your credit card company has already payed these people, you should have refuted the charges a loooonnng time ago.

  31. pilot-link for Agenda/Yopy/Zaurus/Linux DA? by hacker · · Score: 1
    If they would send me a few units and some specifications, I could probably retrofit pilot-link to work with it, assuming it's using sane (documented) protocols.

    I asked the same thing of the Yopy and and Agenda people, with exactly the same response... none.

    Their loss, not mine.

    It's not that these tools don't exist, it's that the vendors don't see the target market clearly enough to want to use them.

  32. $20 for Linux source code? by Nikkos · · Score: 1

    I know I'm browsing at 3, but did someone miss this?

    Source code for Linux Kernel(CD) -------- US$20.00

    It can't cost that much to produce the CD, so what are they charging for?

    Nikkos

  33. Yeah, but only for US/Canadian folks... :-( by Andreas+Rueckert · · Score: 1

    Is it, because they don't trust in our shiny new European currency? Hey, Linux is more popular over here, than in the US! Sell a PowerPlay 3 with a SDK CD for about 100 Euro, and apps shouldn't be an issue within no time...

  34. Hardware is good, software is ... by ahowlett · · Score: 1


    I've been hacking around with the PowerPlay III (the Palm III) clone for about a month. My notes are at http://www3.sympatico.ca/howlettfamily/linuxda/not es.html

    In summary, I'm happy with the hardware but have serious reservations about the linuxda gui library and related apps. For hacking around, this thing is great, but I wouldn't keep my address book or calendar on linuxda until they fix the reset button and at least release the information so we can build a linux desktop sync app.

    For those who question the need for/usefullness of linux on a PDA - maybe you have not had the dubious pleasure of working with the PalmOS memory manager, or all the bizarre PalmOS translations of libc.

    later,
    Andrew.

  35. Re:Very bad experience with Empower Technologies.. by karouser · · Score: 1

    I too waited the 6-9 weeks for my preorder. I called them on their posted phone number on their site and talked to friendly charming and concerned women who responded to my request about the delay in shipping she then gave me an email and confirmed the fedex ground shipping and gave me a tracking number I guess that it never acccured to some one to call be polite and ask for these things

    ps It pays to be firm but not threating I also like my unit I recieved

    --
    Cut! Slash! Hack!
  36. Sync Problems by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0



    I have this pda also. I cannot get it to sync with win98. I emailed Empower they asked if my comports work. Of course they do. That is all the assistance I recieved from them. I emailed the person that did the previous review on this pda and they said their's didn't sync either. If anyone has any idea what is wrong with it email me at tekwil@yahoo.com

    --
    The Arkie Libertarian
  37. Agenda VR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Agenda out? Any good news?

  38. My time in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a not-so-proud owner of a PowerPlay III as well.

    Not only did I have the same shipping problems as stated above (charged the day after, shipped 9 weeks later), I was foolish enough to insist that this was not acceptable and threatened to place a claim with my CC company after 8 weeks. At this point they relented, and refunded my first purchase, and re-placed the charge so that I would have another 60 days of protection from my CC company.

    So, one hurdle solved. I got a tracking number when the PDA was finally shipped on the 19th, and was able to watch it's delivery from that point on, no complaints there, FedEx did their job just fine in this case.

    Upon opening the package I found that the PDA I had received had a torn screen protector. "No biggie" I think, and proceed to try out the PDA.

    Well, after a few hours of trying it, I realize that the hand writing on this thing is absolute CRAP! The only thing I had really heard about these was that the handwriting recognition was good, but it takes me close to 20 tries to get a T reliably, and ironically enough, this is using the Palm style T, and it's not on their sheet. Then I go for an H. Oh god, after close to 50 tries, nada. I give up and go for the writing guide, ok, now I get hs about 1/2 the time I type them in. Time for an E. 8 tries, with their "Handwriting Guide" right in front of me, to get it to produce the letter e. All told, the word "the" takes me close to 1 day to complete.

    After many hours of practice, I'm proud to say I can now complete the word "the" in just under 20 seconds. So much for their handwritting recognition.

    At this point I'm hoping I can salvage my investment by flashing it with a copy of Palm from my dead Palm3x. Palm flashing tool doesn't even recognize the thing, so I ask Empower how. 3 days later, and the answer is: We don't support PalmOS. Try again, this time simply asking for their flashing tool (they promised OS updates, they better have one) and never get an answer.

    Fine, I muck around with the thing for a few more days, trying to get better at writing on it, but mostly end up playing games. Guess what? Even the games are buggy beyond usefullness. Take Minesweeper for example, simple enough game, you click squares, sometimes mark them as mines, and sometimes place question marks on them, how hard is it to get this right? Evidently too hard for Empower Technologies. Marking a flag consists of holding down the schedule button while tapping the square. Works fine, square is not flagged as a mine. Only now you're stuck, because the moment you let go of that scheduler button, you know what happens?? The scheduler pops up. Annoying, I think, but I close it and tap on the minesweeper game again to go back to it.. Only, it's gone, the game is reset when you run something else.

    Ok, so here's a PDA with hand writing recognition I can't use, games that I can't play, and flashable memory I can't flash.

    All right time to invoke that 30 days from shipping return policy. I email them requesting the appropriate info needed to send it back for a refund. Their reply (The end of their buisness day the next day):

    "According to our refund policy, you may return any item from our store in new condition with original packaging and accessories. This means that you are able to open the box that contains the PowerPlay III PDA; however, if the plastic shrinkwrap around the PDA is open, you will not be able to return the product as it will no longer be in its original packaging. (http://www.linuxda.com/store/refundpolicy.htm)"

    News to me, their refund policy says nothing about the condition of the packaging. So I tell them so, demanding my refund. I never get a reply.

    Call me a sap, I wait almost a week before trying again. In this time I find that the screen is not accepting input in the lower left quarter of the number input area (I hadn't bothered to try numbers until this point) This time I try a bit harder, mentioning that they shipped me not only a defective PDA but a damaged one, and mention again my dissatisfaction with their software.

    2 days later, no reply, I try again. I finally get a reply. Same as above. I'm getting very pissed off.

    I reply to this, AGAIN stating that this is a flat out lie, and that the unit is broken, defective and that I refuse to pay for it.

    Again expecting no responce, I initiate a charge with my credit card company. I figure that even without Empower's help I can return the acursed thing.

    The next day I get an email saying they are "considering [my] request" and will let me know after the weekend.

    After a rather anxious weekend, I get another email stating "we will provide you with the In-Warranty Service. The standard RMA policy for the In-Warranty Service is where you return the faulty product to us, and in turn, we provide you with a new product in exchange."

    Not at all what I want, so I call the credit card company to verify I'm protected against this. Sad thing is, I evidently have no "company doesn't honor return policy" insurance, and they insist this is the best deal I will get.

    So, after paying for the PDA, paying currency conversion charges to my credit card company twice, I am forced to pay another $15 to ship the PDA back to them in exchange for a new PDA, less the screen cover.

    Now I can only hope there is a local linux freak not opposed to paying a premium for a POS PDA without a 9 week shipping delay.

    The moral of the story? STAY THE F*CK AWAY FROM THESE GUYS!!! In fact, I would be a lot happier if slashdot quit gaving them all this good press too.

  39. Two Words: INTERACTIVE FICTION by ReaganBSD · · Score: 1

    "So.. I ask you, linux based or not, what cool shit can you do with a PDA nowadays? Let's hear some real examples.. not 'theoretically you could do blah blah'."

    http://www.refalo.com/palm/interactive.htm
    http://infocom.gerf.org

    Download a few IF games. You'll be addicted instantly.

    --

    So ya wanna email me, eh? Change .su to .am.