Slashdot Mirror


Review: Impostor

Slashdot author Chris DiBona took the afternoon off to watch the lightly promoted new Sci-Fi movie "Impostor," which was based on the Philip K. Dick story of the same name. In short, it's a nice bon-bon of a film with solid effects so long as you don't expect too much from it.

Before I get started, it should be pointed out that managing expectations is very important when going to see a movie. If you go into this movie expecting a "Blade Runner" or an "Alien" you probably won't be so happy. If you go into this expecting a "Screamers" or "Pitch Black" however, then you'll probably enjoy the hell out of it.

"Imposter" stars Gary Sinise as an Oppenheimer-like weapons researcher named Spencer Olham. He's working on creating a superweapon to unleash upon an alien menace originating from Alpha Centauri. Frankly, watching the movie, we're getting our asses kicked, with human society devolving into a fascist state huddled under energy domes for protection.

The aliens, however, really aren't the focus of the film, which is neither good nor bad, as they aren't really central to the plot. Sinise's character Olham is picked up by the government as he is suspected of being an alien replicant instead of the real Olham, with the additional feature of a bomb in his chest designed to go off when he meets with the Chancellor of Earth. After being picked up and taken to an ominous interrogation center to be killed, he manages to escape to the dead zone between city-domes, a dystopic scene of poverty and the overlooked. Within the zone, Spencer convinces the streetwise Cale to sneak him back into the city to meet up with his wife, Maya.

I don't want to go much further into the actual plot of the film, as it doesn't really matter that much. It's fairly predictable but enjoyable. The IMDB entry for "Impostor" notes that this was originally one part of a three-part movie that was expanded to fill the full length of this film. There does seem to be a bit of padding going on, like the exploration of Cale's motivation for helping Olham sneak back into the city where Olham's wife Maya (played by Madeline Stowe) works. In the end you don't mind because the padding is well done and entertaining.

The effects are enjoyable in a "look it's a cool city with ships flying around all over it" way and the cast is much stronger than you'd expect in this kind of movie, but not too much. I did feel that Vincent D'Onofrio was probably not very well cast in his role as Major Hathaway. Mr. D'Onofrio is the kind of actor that when he has the right role really shines (his work on Law and Order, for instance). But still, even ill-placed, he's enjoyable to watch.

To wrap up, "Impostor" is a decent flick worth your $5.75 matinee price while elongating your lunch hour and definitely worth taking the time to watch on cable, although the effects would not be as enjoyable.

29 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Pitch Black by flikx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't knock pitch black, that's really up there as far as SCI FI goes. Like Supernova and Event Horizon.

    It's a sad world indeed if we expect everything to be high caliber, like LOTR and Star Wars. (hah!)

    As for imposter, I swear I saw a trailer for this on some VHS movie I rented for $0.99 two years ago.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:Pitch Black by chrisd · · Score: 3, Informative

      I actually wasn't knocking it. I liked it.

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    2. Re:Pitch Black by Arandir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like science fiction. Unfortunately so many directors and producers figure that they can dump all the rules for making good movies just because the current flick is science fiction. They can get away with it because most people go into a scifi movie expecting cool effects and not much more.

      Take your average scifi movie and take out the scifi and the effects. It sucks rocks! Ditto for Supernova and Event Horizon. I haven't seen Imposter, but I suspect that if were translated into a non-scifi fugitive movie it would be average.

      Some of the best scifi movies delved deep into motivations, character development, basic human themes, etc., but did so in a way that only true scifi can do. Prime examples are Forbidden Planet and Blade Runner.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:Pitch Black by Cyberllama · · Score: 2

      Pitch Black *WAS* a good movie. But we all know perfectly well that Supernova is the of *THE* worst movies, EVER. Supernova supersucked.

  2. Finally Released? by TechFire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I distinctly remember seeing a trailer for it two years ago and thinking "Wow, that looks good." About a year later I went to the video store, but I could not find Imposter (little did I know that the film never made it to the theater).

    The next trailer I saw was just last month, and it said the movie was "Coming Christmas Day".

    Christmas Day came and past, and I never saw any theaters with it. Then I saw the trailer on Tuesday that said it was "Coming January 4th".

    Well, after pushing back the release date 3 times it is good to see they finally got it in theaters. I can't wait to watch it.

  3. Expectations by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to be pedantic here...but aren't most films enjoyable, as long as you don't expect much from it?

    The Curse, and Python notwithstanding, obviously.

  4. I kinda liked it - but Dick's been done better by _J_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always liked Sinise and he was a producer for this, but it just doesn't compare to Blade Runner or Total Recall.

    That being said I liked the ending. It twisted more than normal and it wasn't the usual ending. It was padded and no secondary characters were developed. I did enjoy Sinise's performance as well as D'Onofrio's. Sinise was unrelenting in his desparation and D'Onofrio was unforgiving in his tracking.

    Unfortunately, I just saw Beautiful Mind last night and it just blew me away. As a result I can't say this was a good movie.

    I hafta say that I just finished watching Strange Brew and I enjoyed just as much if not more. It's held up well.:)

    IMHO, as per

    J:)

  5. I beg to differ... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Every review except this one seems to agree with me (unfortunately, I didn't read them before going to see it.) I don't expect every sci-fi movie I see to have mind-blowing computer effects, but this movie reeks of the mid-80s. Perhaps it would have been better recieved by the critics if it had been released now. As it is, it looks rather dated and I found the plot being pushed to the back in favor of explosions and hollywood flash. In short, if you HAVE to see this movie, take some funny friends, so at least you can be entertained by their MST3K like comments. Otherwise, go see LOTR again.

  6. Hey, I *liked* They Live! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't you dis Rowdy Roddy Piper, man! He'll come and...um...look at you with special sunglasses...and mod you down...

    Okay, I'm done now.

    1. Re:Hey, I *liked* They Live! by mbourgon · · Score: 2

      I think the best part was basically:
      RRR: Put these Sunglasses on.
      TTL: No
      RRR: Yes
      TTL: No
      RRR: Let's wrestle.
      TTL: Okay.

      (hilarity ensues; apparently the 'Cripple Fight' in South Park was inspired by this, as it was drawn out and painful to watch)

      [TTL Wins]

      TTL: I win, therefore I will put the sunglasses on.

      Hey, gotta love it when the savior of the world is wrestling the future president of the galaxy. Makes it seem more... real, somehow.

      *snicker*

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  7. another phil dick movie by mlas · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just saw the trailer for Minority Report which looks like a better bet for Philip K Dick fans, despite the presence of both Tom Cruise and Steven Spielberg. Is it just coincidence that both of these are coming out at the same time?

    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
    1. Re:another phil dick movie by limber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a Philip K. Dick fan, I'm disappointed that *Impostor* has turned out to be such dreck. I secretly cheer for PKD-inspired projects.

      I'm not too chuffed about Spielberg's involvement with the upcoming *Minority Report* either, given the letdown of the PKD-flavoured *AI* (yes I know it was based on an B Aldiss story, but it definitely had a lot of Dickian themes -- the robot boy who wants to be real, the broken 'bots that struggle on hopelessly even when they know it's futile, etc.). Still, there's hope. At least you know there's going to be decent money available for CGI effects. :-)

      As far as Phil Dick films go, I'd rate them in order of viewing enjoyment as follows (most enjoyed at top):

      1. Blade Runner - what great set design!
      2. Total Recall - i remember thinking, hey, was that the same actress from Action Jackson?
      3. Screamers - a 'go in with low expectations, and it'll be acceptable' affair
      4. *existenZ* - cheesy CanCon fluff; Cronenberg has the talent and history to do this sort of thing a LOT better (if I'm not mistaken Cronenberg actually wrote one of the first, rejected drafts for Total Recall)
      5. Confessions of a Crap Artist - hey, I live in Canada, there's nowt much tae do some winter evenings...

      I haven't seen *Put It In Gere*, and probably won't. (imagine that, an adult film inspired by PKD -- how's *that* for a dick joke?)

      Other movies I'd claim were thematically PKD influenced include:
      *Truman Show* - is it just me, or did they completely rip off the plot for this flick from *Time Out of Joint*? Truman = Ragle Gumm!),
      *the Matrix* - obviously lots of fun, looking forward to the sequel.

      Any other candidates?

    2. Re:another phil dick movie by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Well, you remember not quite correctly. Piers Anthony wrote the novelization of the movie.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:another phil dick movie by SealBeater · · Score: 2

      I thank you both, I stand corrected.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  8. Re:Kids, don't learn English from reading this rev by statusbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm.... Maybe it would be better if slashdot had a movie review policy that specified that movie reviews must be written in the most fluent language of the reviewer - like Perl or C++ instead of english.

    --jeff

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  9. Re:Kids, don't learn English from reading this rev by jerryasher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While watching the movie chrisd got his ass kicked with a society that is fascist and hudled under domes. Exactly how do you assault someone with a society? See Horton Hears a Who or Men in Black for details.

  10. Re:Kids, don't learn English from reading this rev by mlk · · Score: 2, Funny

    class Impostor extends Thread implements Flim
    {
    public static final void main(String argv, int argc)
    {
    new Impostor();
    }

    Imposter(){
    super();
    while(playing) sleep();
    };
    }

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  11. Reused footage (aka Starship Troopers prequel ;) ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Seen this movie and it was average. I didn't hate the movie but I didn't like it much either.

    Visual FX wise, I was disapointed with the recycled starship troopers FEDNET footage during the begining half of the movie and that most of the government troopers were using starship troopers uniforms. LAMEO... I guess they had to cut corners on the budget seeing its released under the Dimension Films banner instead of New Line :).

    The other effects ranged from piss poor to above average.I'm guessing Netter Digital did alot of the space sequences which looks a bit cheesy.

    Some of the city shots/buildings looked good.. but the space/airship design and animation was odd except for mayable one or two scenes.

    I'm still trying to figure out ILM's contribution to the film.

    The editing was poor. The sequence with the implant removal was jaring timing wise. Alot of action sequences were not clear.. as the action was heavy post processed with lots of moving camera work with shots that were often out of focus or where the action was slightly off camera.

    And Plot holes...

    Well, if the government agents simply just did the "operation" while Olham was sedated there wouldn't be a movie :). I mean why strap him into one chair.. wake him up, then place him over into a second device. Silly.

    Also the idea that the government told Olham that they knew the Centauri ship landed in the forest. Why didn't they search the ship?

    These guys had technology to allow their troops to see through whole buildings but yet they couldn't find what Mr. And Mrs. Olham found by running through the woods in pitch darkness.

    Oh boy.

    Oh well it could have been worse.. I guess.

    The short story is good but it looked like it didn't provide enough material for a feature.. so basically most of the moive is a chase sequence which really added nothing to the overall story.

    But overall I'm glad... good or bad I'm glad theres more sci fi stuff out there. With a bit more work this movie would have been better.

  12. I beg to differ... I beg to differ back. by Transient0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    > Every review except this one seems to agree
    > with me (unfortunately, I didn't read them
    > before going to see it.)

    I went to see this movie about three weeks ago with a friend who had advance tickets. It was probably the first movie i had seen in years without knowing ANYTHING about it(i didn't know it was a sci-fi movie until i saw the space ships). I had absolutely no expectations of the movie and was surprised by how much i liked it. A couple of the characters are a bit cliched(okay, all of the characters are a bit cliched), but still, it's a good story. I really liked the way the protagonist had done nothing wrong so you sympathize with him, but still the audience is left totally in the dark as to his status and doesn't know whether or not to secretly root for the bad guys.

    i don't really have anything bad to say about this movie.

  13. try watching channels besides SciFi network by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 3, Informative

    Other than a massive airtime buy on SciFi (which, given that 80% of their commericials are for their own shows, probably cost about $1.89) and a few other minor cable channels, real-world promotion of this film has been zilch.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:try watching channels besides SciFi network by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is all over comedy central too. I watch that channel more than any other (by far) and Impostor is being promoed to death on that channel as well.

      I would have thought comedy central, sci-fi, and dimension (film distributor) was all owned by the same company, but that is not the case, so actual money did change in promoting this movie.

      Sci-Fi is owned by USA Networks (which was just bought by Universal/Vivendi, the same company that owns mp3.com)

      Comedy Central is owned by Viacom, says this site.

      Dimension is owned by Miramax, which is owned by Disney -- says this site and this site.

      I don't watch too much tv, but you would think that Disney would plug the movie on ABC and ESPN, which it also owns, especially since they are hurting for cash right now. Why not promote in house?

      How is this related to Impostor? Only tangentially. But be aware of the Big Six media companies. Three are involved in this film. It's more than six, but the other companies are AOL/TimeWarner, Sony, NewsCorp, and Bertelsmann (of Napster fame).

      Others would add GE to the list, because they own NBC.

      In any case, the entirety of our information and entertainment world comes nearly exclusively through those 8 companies.

  14. was that supposed to be funny? by S.+Allen · · Score: 2

    Event Horizon and Supernova are two of the worst movies I've ever seen.

  15. Worked on it by benh57 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I worked on this movie. It filmed at Raleigh studios in Manhattan Beach (south of LAX) where they took over several stages between Nov 99 and Feb of 2000.

    The set was huge, and pretty amazing. They built the entire subway inside two sound stages, along with some sci-fi buildings (the hospital).

    Apparently they had distribution problems which prevented its release. We also worked on Evolution, which started filming several months AFTER Impostor finished, but obviously was released a while ago.

  16. But I must! by clump · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Pitch Black wasn't a very good film ;) It was entirely predictable, and it was merely a rehash of the Alien movies. Oh come on, the dude from Fast and the Furious?

    It's a sad world indeed if we expect everything to be high caliber


    Why shouldn't we expect what we pay for to be high-calibre?
  17. Bad Movie by lynuhx · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is simply a bad film. If it weren't for the special effects, that incidentally only show up primarily in the beginning of the film, this would be a "B" grade film. All of the running around in the so-called Dead Zone did nothing to further the plot made thin by the obvious padding. This could have been a good short subject if it were limited to the elements essential to the plot. Sadly, Sinise (one of the Producers of the film) saw fit to expand it into a bomb. Don't bother renting it, as it will likely be rendered to tape and DVD quite soon.

  18. Scissors now on desk by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Weird, I just got home from seeing this thing. Luckily I got in for free. When I heard about this movie like two years ago I expected a Blade Runner with ten times the quality of special effects and acting on par to BR because you won't want your new movie to suck ass compared to a movie based on a story by the same author. Then this piece of crap came out.

    No the special effects aren't cool, I was more impressed watching the Babylon 5 pilot in terms of CG shots. Fancy fly overs of a city to give a sense of scale only work if the city is believable. Now why would a society protecting itself with dome shields build skyscrapers, and fancy ass ones at that? It was sort of sad some effects shots looked good (the medical print outs) while the news broadcasts and interface for the scanner thingie were just sad.

    The outdoor shots were sort of cool to watch because I've been to alot of those buildings. A good number of exterior shots were filmed at CS Pomona in or on the CompSci building. The building with the weird looking triangular points is said building, the stairs they first walk up I broke my ankle on. You'll notice this is the same building in Gattaca. Same with the "walls of the city" which you'll notice is the same place Ethan Hawke's character in Gattaca watched rockets launching.

    The acting was pretty decent but the screenwriters sure did add alot of stuff from the like four page short story originally written.

    *SPOILER*
    I guess I missed in the movie where the mention the passphrase for the bomb. I was waiting for somebody to bring it up considering it is a major plot device in the story. Am I the only one who missed it or did anybody else sort of fail to catch the single line in the whole movie making reference to it?
    *END SPOILER*

    With Gary Sinise I you don't know what to expect. He does such a damn good job in some good movies and then pulls of a stinker like Reindeer Games and the Imposter. Overall I rate it pretty low and I'm glad I didn't pay to see it. Like the original review says, people ecpecting Blade Runner will be disappointed. Maybe next time I'll go see A Beautiful Mind: Romper Stomper 2.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  19. Outer Limits episode... by nettdata · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I'm too lazy to go look it up, it should also be noted that this story was also adapted to a 1 hour episode of the Outer Limits.

    It was thoroughly enjoyable and was extremely well done. Quite frankly, I was rather skeptical about the chances of it making it as a full-on in-theatre movie.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  20. Dont blame Dick by Gabriel72 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I notice that Blade runner was mentioned alongside aliens as reference to "good" Sci Fi. Blade runner was adapted from another P K Dick story "Do androids dream of electric sheep" When I say adapted I mean that Hollywood removed any meaningful content and replaced it with breasts and explosions. Compared to the painfully detailed social commentary and legendary character depth that the book contains, the movie is the worst pile of crap ever to grace the screen.

  21. Re:OT : AI and other stuff by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    Radio Free Albemuth would make a great movie, and you can munge stuff from the Valis trilogy to pad with some sense of story.