Slashdot Mirror


The Tick to be Cancelled

mr.buddylee writes "This is a short write up, but evidently The Tick is going to be cancelled. " There really isn't much there to read except the notice. I'll keep watching until the last episode airs on Jan 24. I enjoyed it even if it was put in a terrifying time slot guaranteeing that nobody saw it. I think if it had a full season to find a footing it would have been a real winner. Ah well, good luck to Ben and his future projects.

72 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. Good riddance by Kutsal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't like it at all anyways :P

    --
    Karma: Bad (but who really cares anyway?)
    1. Re:Good riddance by Navarre · · Score: 2

      Neither did I. I love the cartoon, but this show had none of the silly magic that made the cartoon great. It was just...dumb. Sad but true.

    2. Re:Good riddance by aka-ed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO, it had a different "silly magic." I loved Warburton's Tick, though it was as different from the animated version as Tom Welling's "Superboy" is different from Kirk Allyn's "Superman." His deadpan simplicity remins me of Dave Einstein ("Super Dave") before he got old and lost a bit of his skills.

      I lost all hope for the series' continuance just a few minutes ago when I checked the TV sched and found an all-night marathon of the crappiest cartoon on earth, "The Family Man."

      This does not make the world a better place. YMMV.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:Good riddance by RoninM · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's Bob Einstein, actually.

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  2. Eh, wasn't enough to keep you watching by Sc00ter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I even have it on a season pass on my TiVo.. but I never watch it.. There's far better shows other there that I'd rather watch..

  3. Well, I'll miss it. by plover · · Score: 2
    Yes, apparently I'm the other guy who watched it. I really enjoy what they did with the Batmanuel character.

    Oh, well, I watched it on ReplayTV and skipped the commercials anyway, so I'm sure I made them no money.

    --
    John
  4. Spooon? Spooon! by Audent · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Tick can NEVER be cancelled because the Tick is INDESTRUCTABLE!

    all I can say is: grip too tight. Must... Break... Free...

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
  5. Jeez Louise, Man - Where's the Villainy? by coljac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a big fan of the Tick - the comic book is one of the few I can stand and the cartoon series is pure magic. But the live action show just didn't get its groove going after the pilot. One thing that was missing was the EVIL - most of the episodes spent more time on antics involving dates, sexual misunderstandings, etc, which are fine in their place but not really the best medium for The Tick's histrionics. To really show what the Tick can do, he needs to be yelling "Spoooon!" whilst crushing evil. If he has to overcome some sexual innuendo to do that, so much the better. But as a Seinfeld-like sitcom, the Tick was so lacklustre I actually forgot to watch a couple of episodes.

    --
    Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    1. Re:Jeez Louise, Man - Where's the Villainy? by Golias · · Score: 5, Informative
      Villains, you say? I think your memory of the book might be a little colored. The fact is that the book seldom focused on fighting villians at all! Let's review, shall we? (spoiler warning)

      Issue 1: The Tick jumps around buildings, meets some ninjas (but does not bother to fight them much, as they clearly pose no threat to him whatsoever), sits in a diner and argues with a waiter about being a tick, passes out and wakes up in a subway tunnel, is rescued by "Clark", a badly disguised superhero.

      Issue 2: Tick spends the entire issue trying to become Clark's friend, mostly pissing him off.

      Issue 3: The Tick actually fights some Ninjas, but 90% of the book is dialogue between Tick and Oedipus, or funny dialogue among the ninjas.

      Issue 4: More ninjas, but mostly time spent getting to know Arthur and Paul The Samurai.

      Issue 5: Ninja story resolved.

      Issue 6: Tick fights The Red Scare, who is not, in fact, a real villain, but an actor hired to pretend he is a villain. A lot of the focus is really on building the relationship between Arthur and Tick. ("You're not... funny, are you?")

      Issue 7: Chairface.

      That's right, folks, it took 7 issues (of a comic that only ran for 12) before the first major villain was actually introduced.

      And then from there... Issue 8 Tick and Arthur argue with Arthur's sister, and decide to leave the City.

      Issue 9 is a road trip story.

      Issue 10 is more road trippin'

      Issue 11, Tick and Arthur coping with New York superhero culture.

      Issue 12, Tick moves into his new home.

      The truth is that The Tick live-action show, with all of the time spend hanging around exchanging funny dialogue, was much closer in pace and tone to the original than the cartoon was. The cartoon could not really spend time pondering stuff like the sexuality of superheroes (which the book did A LOT, although in more subtle ways that the recent show did). Most of the fights in the comic were over in one or two panels, as the Tick was so absurdly hard for anybody to seriously hurt.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Jeez Louise, Man - Where's the Villainy? by msobkow · · Score: 2
      That may be true, but the animated version was a lot funnier than the live version. There are just too many abuses you can put animated characters through that require expensive special effects for live footage.

      While I've watched all the live episodes I've been able to, I've rarely found myself laughing out loud, which happened regularly with the animation.

      If I had to blame the death of "The Tick" on something, it would be weak writing.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:Jeez Louise, Man - Where's the Villainy? by coljac · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, perhaps a comparison to the cartoon is more relevant.

      Episode 1: The Idea Men
      2: Chairface
      3: Dinosaur Neil
      4: Mr Mental
      5: The BreadMaster
      6: El Seed
      ... and so on.

      Practically every episode had a humorous villain, which gave every episode focus but made the general "life" problems more funny because of the disconnect between supervillainy and trying to fix the microwave, etc.

      --
      Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    4. Re:Jeez Louise, Man - Where's the Villainy? by Golias · · Score: 2
      When you have that much talk and so little actions, what's the point? The hero doesn't have to overcome anything. It just appears to me the that the tick was just a wanna-be!!!!

      You just answered your own question. The Tick was, in fact, a wanna-be superhero.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  6. Oh well...I won't miss it... by FatSean · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, I was brought up on the Tick Cartoon, not the comic book. Missing all m favorite villians was one strike. The loss of Tick's yperKinetic movements was a 2nd strike. There really was no third strike, but I didn't see the show getting a hit anyway. It was a good try though...

    --
    Blar.
  7. Patrick Warburton by cliffy2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will always be David Putty in my heart of hearts.
    (Before this gets modded down, Warburton portrayed the Tick. Not completely random.)

  8. Dang by JWhiton · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suspected this would happen. The thing is about The Tick is that your average Fox viewer isn't intelligent enough to get any of the jokes.

    Now, I'm not saying everyone who watches Fox is cranially deficient, but think about the kind of shows the network survives on. Ally McBeal. Melrose Place. Temptation freakin' Island! The network is built on running low-brow shows that copy from other successful shows. When The Tick delivers one of his trademark metaphors, most of the audience is wondering why they aren't seeing any car chases or strippers.

    Now I'll admit that Fox's early reason for surviving was the Simpsons, but that's an exception in a sea of low-quality knock-offs.

    I'll miss ya, Tick.

    1. Re:Dang by wurp · · Score: 2

      I watched the show, and it was very good. WIth The Tick as their starting material, it could have been better, but I laughed my ass off and I don't watch TV, as a rule.

    2. Re:Dang by alexmogil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What other shows, especially sitcoms, are *not* idiotic today? Hell, even NBC's wildly-successful show Emeril had (BAM!) a sex plot in one of it's episodes. Or, better yet - Onnna the Friends is gonna havea baybeee outta wedlock! Who could it beeee!?To say FOX has nothing but low-brow shows tells me you've ne'er watched Malcom, King of the Hill, or Futurama.There's good writing there. You just gotta look for it.

      --
      A winner is you!
    3. Re:Dang by breon.halling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fox's early reason for surviving was the Simpsons

      Actually, if I recall correctly, it was "Married with Children..." that was Fox's first major success.

      This, however, lends even more credence to your argument. ;)

      --
      "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
    4. Re:Dang by Otter · · Score: 2
      The thing is about The Tick is that your average Fox viewer isn't intelligent enough to get any of the jokes.

      Or, maybe, the show only has three or four jokes and, while they're funny, they wear out after a few weeks. The Tick speaks in weird metaphors, his fellow superheros have the foibles and frustrations of ordinary mortals and -- OK, two jokes. Oh, and he used to yell "Spoooon!" but he doesn't do that any more for copyright reasons.

      It was good for a few laughs but did you guys really think this was going to stay on the air for more than a season or two?

    5. Re:Dang by Golias · · Score: 2
      Ben Edlund himself pointed out that "Spooon!" was not introduced until several issues into the comic, nor did it appear into the cartoon during the first few episodes (season 2, IIRC).

      Why should anybody expect the gag to be pounded out during the first 6 episodes of the live show?

      All these fucking fanboys whining about how it's not the same as the dumbed-down cartoon make me want to puke. The original books WERE the tick. All else (Tick issues by other authors, the cartoon series, the live show, the toys, etc.) are merely Ben Edlund's well-deserved opportunity to pay off his college loans.

      Personally, I thought the cartoon was okay, if a little shallow... and the live series started out kind of weak in the pilot episode but found its legs quickly and was easilly better than 90% of the shit that gets passed on as comedy these days.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Dang by _J_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      But I loved the metaphors....

      "You're on a first name basis with lucidity, chum. I have to call him Mr. Lucidity, which is no good when you're in a pinch."

      J:)

    7. Re:Dang by Zurion · · Score: 2

      Wow! I wouldn't have said this at all. Granted there are some really, REALLY terrible shows on fox (Temptation Island). However, The Family Guy, Futurama, and The Simpson's all are shows that require some sort of intelligence (and attention span) if you want to catch all of the jokes. In any of these shows, if you laugh for more than 5 seconds you're probably going to miss an obscure joke. For instance, take the "All you're base are belong to us," in Futurama in this past week's episode.

  9. The Simpsons? by sterno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any idea what the history of the Simpsons ratings were? I'm just wondering if back in the day they were as quick to axe as they are now.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:The Simpsons? by Uberminky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know the history of the Simpsons ratings. I did enjoy the couple of episodes of The Tick I saw. But one thing I do know: The Tick is no Simpsons. It just doesn't have the depth to be comparable, IMO.

      --

      The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

    2. Re:The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Simpsons was a runaway hit from the very beginning, it only took a handful of episodes for it to catch on. Plus, Fox was only in its second or third season as a network at the time, even a moderate hit would have been a pretty big deal to them at the time, and The Simpsons was much more than that. It's quite possibly the only reason Fox still exists as a network today.

      The commentary on The Simpsons season 1 DVDs explains some of that history, especially how ripoffs of simpsons merchandise started appearing even before the end of the first season.

      And I gotta say, I saw The Tick's pilot a long time before the series actually debuted, and loved it. But aside from the pilot, the show itself has been a big letdown. Though I held out hope it would get better, I'm not at all surprised it's being cancelled. It just wasn't that funny. Maybe someone'll give Mr. Edlund another cartoon instead. Whether it was the Tick or something else, I'd watch it.

    3. Re:The Simpsons? by G-Man · · Score: 2

      As I recall, The Simpsons had a "running start" since it began as short segments on the Tracy Ullman Show. I forget exactly when it was spun off, but it's interesting that it so outlived the show where it started. Are the segments from the Tracy Ullman Show on the Season 1 DVD? That would be mighty cool.

  10. Advertising by alexmogil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How is it possible that we saw SO much advertising for this show during the World Series (A secret message.... from my TEETH!), but I never saw commercial one for the show while it was on the air?Honestly if they would have advertised it a *little* more, perhaps I could tell you what time the show was on. Heck, I don't even know what day it was on. Just like Family Guy.Yet, I am pretty sure we're all sick of 'A Very Special Boston Public' and 'That Goddamned 80's Show' commercials.

    --
    A winner is you!
    1. Re:Advertising by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      Amen.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    2. Re:Advertising by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      Did anyone else think that 2 hours of new family guy all at once was weird last night? I lost it during that 4th episode. I just lost intrest. Does this mean they are dumping the Family guy?

  11. Live Action Tick by skroz · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...was cool, though the time slot was awful. What I REALLY want to see is a live action Johnny Bravo.

    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
    1. Re:Live Action Tick by Fesh · · Score: 2

      I dunno... I saw one episode, and kept thinking, "But... He doesn't have the googly white eyes! It just doesn't look right!"

      As for live-action Johnny Bravo... Why do I get the feeling that parts of it would look like a Tool video?

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  12. The cartoon rules by baptiste · · Score: 2

    I never thought the current show was all that great. The cartoon had a twisted bent to it that was enjoyable from time to time. Course, I never watch cartoons - its for the kids, yeah - that's it. he kids.

    1. Re:The cartoon rules by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      do they have the tick cartoon on DVD? I would love to have the entire what....3 or 4 seasons...I think it was on that long.

      --I feal----Funnky---monnkey--- :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:The cartoon rules by greenfly · · Score: 2

      There were three seasons, and you can find all the episodes on your favorite fileshare app in divx form.

  13. Sigh... by Enry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having gotten started with the cartoon, then buying a bunch of comics on EBay, the TV show seems to be more of the comic-book-style Tick, which was pretty good. Too bad they didn't bring in Samuri Paul(? it's been a while..) or the ninjas. That would have been a great episode.

    "Jeez. I thought Ninjas just got sucked up into jet engines.."

    Given Fox's recent fare of programming, I didn't expect it to last. The only thing left is the Simpsons, since I can only get the last 15 minutes of Futurama because football runs over. C'mon guys, if the game goes too long EVERY WEEK, don't you think you can schedule around it?

    1. Re:Sigh... by shanek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing that pisses me off about it was that last week it didn't run over; the game stopped right at 7:00, but those idiots kept talking for 20 minutes. Guys, when you run over your time, shut the frell up!!!!

    2. Re:Sigh... by Enry · · Score: 2

      That wouldn't work, as Fox starts the show "already in progress", meaning that the first 15 minutes is never shown. *grumble*

  14. Typical Network Antics by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on, you all saw it coming. The Tick was never gonna succeed with all the crap the Fox nimrods edited into it. I remember when the creator of the Tick was interviewed about the live action show...he said alot of the stupid dialogue wasn't his idea and he seemed kinda pissed that some knucklehead edited it to be that way.

    Networks are great at shooting themselves in the foot when it comes to innovation. Remember the Clerks animated cartoon? It only lived long enough to spawn 6 episodes but was hilarious and had the trademark Clerks humor out the wazzoo. The episodes built the plot successively, so if you didn't see episode one before 2 you could be slightly lost.

    Guess what. NBC (or was it CBS) aired the 4th episode as the pilot! People were lost and wondering what the hell was going on when they saw it. After 4 was 5 and 6 but that was it. It got canned. I suggest everyone go grab it on DVD. A true jewel.

    1. Re:Typical Network Antics by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      "Guess what. NBC (or was it CBS) aired the 4th episode as the pilot! People were lost and wondering what the hell was going on when they saw it."

      Worse, it was ABC (Disney)...

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:Typical Network Antics by Life+Blood · · Score: 2

      Actually Clerks was cancelled before it ever aired. Thats why there were only 6 eps, they were contractually obligated to make at least 6 so they made the minimum and then aired it during the summer in obscurity. Crusade faced a similar fate on TNT. JMS refused to make it the bikini sci-fi adventure and so it got cancelled before a single episode aired. Its network politics.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    3. Re:Typical Network Antics by RoninM · · Score: 2
      Ah, whatever happened to sing-along theme songs...

      What? You don't watch Enterprise?

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  15. The Seinfeld Curse! by lostchicken · · Score: 5, Funny

    It strikes again!

    For those who don't know, Patrick Warburton (The Tick) had a part on Seinfeld as David Puddy.

    Like all the ex-Seinfeld cast members before him, Warburton's show seemed doomed from the start. This makes the 3rd flop.

    Hmm. I wonder if Julia Louis-Dreyfus' show will be cancelled before it starts. Good luck.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:The Seinfeld Curse! by JWhiton · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't know if he's the kiss of death for any new show. He (Warburton) has been on Family Guy for a few seasons. He's the voice of Peter's disabled neighbor, whose name escapes me at the moment. Joe?

  16. Re:*yawn* by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Actually I rather like the first season of Simpsons...the show was just a show back then, and didn't carry around the baggage that it does now. That being said, I'm glad the Tick was cancelled. I watched an episode, and it was just the usual sitcom formula that hasn't been refreshed since 1972. Better to have it dead and gone, than possibly become popular and tarnish the Tick's image.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  17. Re:Comedy Central? by MagikSlinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's certainly in their price range. How much did they spend on production values? $1.98?

    Without the epic grandeur that was the Tick comic book and animated series, the live-action series became smaller than life, becoming more of an ironic statement than a big, steaming cup o' hommage to the glorious yesteryear of comic book superheroes!

    Ahem, but I degress. Where were the villains? The villains with villany so insane they could be called mad! Where was Charles, the evil brain-child? Where was Chairface Chippendale? Without these larger than life adventures for the Tick to rail against with his child-like enthusiasm for Justice, I just don't see the point. I mean, where's that call to the Heroe's Quest, chum? Where's the kind of adventure that makes you want to cry, "SPOOOOON!!!"

    Ahem. Sorry, I don't know what came over me. I haven't been the same since I found moth suite at a garage sale the other day.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  18. The world simply wasn't ready for The Tick by foxtrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, surely, our beloved City is unprepared for gigantic blue justice striding upon the rooftops of their daily lives. The forces of truth and justice fall silent this day, but they shall rise again like the head to the top of a cold one, if you know what I mean, chum. Yes, evildoers and television programming execs, you have won this round, but as sure as the sun will rise over the dark jungles of Tibet, your day in that sun will be over, and then you shall again face... The Tick.

  19. Maybe if it'd been on by Octal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe if they had actually showed episodes, instead of pre-empting it with other crap, it'd have worked better. Or they could've started showing the episodes at the start of the season, when people haven't figured out viewing schedules yet.

  20. Won't be missed ... by ez76 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The series was pretty lyme if you ask me.

    1. Re:Won't be missed ... by Fesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shhhhhh! There are some pretty devoted fans hanging around here... You might tick someone off!

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    2. Re:Won't be missed ... by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think if it continued to use the animated format instead of the live-action format, it would of gained more viewers. Some things aren't cut out for live-action. Tick was one of them -- it was good, very good, as an animated show.

      Other shows that should of been better off animated:
      Power Rangers (all series)
      Most(if not all) live-action shows comming from Saban Enterntainment (usually on Fox).

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  21. Well, one less Tick for me to be confused with... by Tickenest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, though, I think the two biggest problems were 1) flimsy plots (i.e. crimefighters not really fighting much crime and 2) FOX.

    It is unfair to say things like, "How did the Simpsons do in its first season?" as I've seen a few people do, since the series, as everybody knows, spawned from the Christmas special, which came from the Tracy Ulmann show short pieces, so it had at least a little exposure before its first true season. Also, the expectations of new shows are different now than they were in the late 1980s. It used to be that networks would be willing to give shows more of a chance to build a fan base. Nowadays, if a show isn't a serious hit by midseason, it gets swept away. Sad, but true.

    --
    This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
  22. yet they can play 4 episodes of... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    Family Guy Back to Back... wasnt the Tick supposed to be on Thursdays?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:yet they can play 4 episodes of... by dimator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Surely you're not speaking ill of Family Guy? In my book, that's the most ridiculously funny show on TV today. It does have a certain style that you just have to dig in order to like the show, though.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  23. Once again, the networks screw the show by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that over and over again networks put good, or at least promising, shows in awful spots or against established leaders. Hello? Put a good show in a dead spot (Thursday at 8 maybe, c'mon Survivor?!), let it build up an audience, then move it to a stronger slot.

    Futurama at 7 on Sundays?! This show is as good, if not better than, the Simpsons, yet it flounders...

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  24. Of course by hexix · · Score: 2

    I think anyone who didn't see this coming was fooling themselves simply because they liked the cartoon.

    The live action show was not funny at all. The closest I got to a chuckle was when they did a closeup on his face and the antennas would wiggle depending on his emotion. But then that just got creepy.

    Now if someone told me they were going to cancel The Family Guy, then I'd be shocked and start talking about bad time slots. But in The Tick's case, it just wasn't funny, sorry.

  25. Invader Zim by NickFusion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On, of all places, Nickelodeon, has much the same twisted sensibility as The Tick cartoon (I love them both, truly I do.)

    Also the brainchild of a independent comic...uh...guy, the fellow who did Johnny the Homicidal Manic.

    Doom Dooom Doom Dooom Doom Dooom De Doom Dooom....

    --
    What were you expecting?
  26. link to an interview with Patrick Warburton by blonde+rser · · Score: 2, Informative

    here is an interview with the tick himself on npr's freshair. talks about the show among other things... interview is pre-cancelation however

  27. Standard Network Male-ox-excrement by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
    I don't watch TV anymore (just DVDs & tapes), but the bogus time slot sounds like exactly what happened to The Single Guy when I was at college. It used to be a good show in a great slot--between Friends and Seinfeld. Then they moved it to its own night and ran it head-to-head with some show I don't recall anymore, but which was better. It was suicide, plain and simple: like sending out a poodle to fight a hippo. And there was no reason for it. The network had a guaranteed audience for an hour-and-a-half, and three good shows in each slot. But they killed that, for no reason I can discern. And a good show died for no good reason.

    That sort of nonsense is not, actually, why I don't watch TV. The simple fact of the matter is that television is finely crafted to be as appealing as possible. As such, it s deuced difficult not to be attracted to it. And if one's not careful, one might spend all one's time in front of the tube. So I play on the computer, which is slightly less bad, or read books, which is much better. More of the former than the latter, I'm afraid:-)

  28. Re:Where the villains are by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

    Oh, I know that. What I meant was why couldn't they create new villains who were larger than life. I mean, they could at least have done Tommy the Evil Boy Genius. The problem is they backed away from creating really epic villains to doing a Seinfeldesque sitcom about the main characters dealing with anemic villains that couldn't scare Police Chief O'Hara from the old Batman series.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  29. Time Slot by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 2

    Time slot? Who cares? I almost never watch a show "live" these days. Who has the time to schedule their lives around network broadcasts? I have two VCRs and they are both programmed to the hilt. (Why do VCRs only have 8 program slots? A salescritter I asked said "most people don't use them at all." He's probably right.) I watch shows when *I* want to. And I fast forward through the commercials. Phthbppppt!

    1. Re:Time Slot by IronChef · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I cannot believe no one has posted a "Get a Tivo" or "get a ReplayTV" note yet. So I'll do it.

      2 VCRs? Dude, get a Tivo or ReplayTV. Then it will take a month to wipe the smile off your face.

  30. Shoes of justice will one day kill the bug of evil by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    I await the day television executives aren't 40, and aren't appealing to 40 year olds.

    The day that business executives are mostly slashdot readers, and the "working man" watches cartoons. The day is coming, my friends. Cartoon network has "adult swim" now - with comics specifically for adults.
    It is only a matter of time. Quantum computing may or may not be a reality, but the Tick will rise again. And so will Shaft.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  31. Tick was opposite Survivor!!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    So they decide to cancel it just as Survivor ends?

    I think that was drawing a lot of people away. Perhaps it will pick up a bit, but it sounds like it wouldn't be soon enough to save the show.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Ben Edlund's future projects by iantf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I went to hear Ben Edlund speak a few years ago, and after he had fielded a couple dozen questions about minutiae from Tick cartoon episodes, I asked "What are you working on besides The Tick?" And he smiled and said, "You know, I'm really glad you asked me that."

    So, while I'm sorry to see The Tick go, I got the impression that Ben's ready to move on. Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing what's next. Ben, you made the world a little weirder - thanks.

  33. Re:Well, one less Tick for me to be confused with. by RoninM · · Score: 2

    Well, The Simpsons had better (read: some) exposure to its target audience (WRT timeslot. Tickheads followed it, but, obviously, the network wasn't in it for a few thousand hardcore fans). The transition from Saturday morning to Thursday night isn't exactly ideal, especially when spaced by a handful of years. I won't count the brief stint on Comedy Central, since being on cable in the wee hours of a Monday (what was it? 1am?) can't be considered exposure.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  34. no big surprise there by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    As compared to the animated version, the live action Tick (the character, not the entire show) was positively flat, unrewarding, and generally a disappointment. Whether it was poorly cast, or just lacklustre writing, the Tick blew relative to his animated predecessor.

    So long, live action Tick. I hardly knew thee, and now I won't have to.

    --

    Mr. Ska

  35. Married with Children by hawk · · Score: 2
    And the only reason that *it* was a success is that that woman (in Michigan?) raised a hullabo when someone said, "bra." The series was only meant for half a season, but people watched it because of the attention she gave it.


    Kind of like the topless donut shops that pop up in California: an incredibly stupid idea, but you're pretty much guaranteed that NOW will show up and protest, getting you press coverage, and the thing works for a few months (before succumbing to the "incredibly stupid idea" thing).


    hawk

  36. and the theaters by hawk · · Score: 2
    When I saw War of the Roses, it had a Simpsons short--which was the reason I didn't bother looking at the first couple of years of the series . . .


    hawk

  37. Timeslots by _aa_ · · Score: 2

    I disagree that the timeslot had anything to do with the demise of the show. Timeslots become popular because of the shows, not the other way around. NBC has 0wn3d Thursday evenings ever since the cosby show, but before the cosby show it was fair game. After that, they put their best crap their to maintain their thursday night audience. Of course now they are losing to survivor but that is besides the point. Thursday night is the biggest TV night for no reason other than the popularity of the cosby show. My basic point being that, aside from like the 2am-7am time slots, the quality of the show dictates it's popularity far more than the timeslot.

    Furthermore, as TiVo and similar technology popularizes, hopefully the networks will realize that they can run more series in the 2am-7am timeslots, because suddenly timeslots are irrelevant because people will watch the show whenever they want to. It'd be nice if they would run entire seasons of the simpsons, etc. marathon style during the off hours for the convinience of tivo viewers.

  38. Re:Here's your answer! by markhb · · Score: 2

    She used to sing on Saturday Night Live (which was about the only camera time she got on the show), and wasn't bad. THey had her doing mostly Gilbert-and-Sullivan parodies, IIRC.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  39. Other Stations by Brand+X · · Score: 2

    Generally agree about Fox. Simpsons has had ups and downs, but is in an up (and the downs were still better than friends) Futurama is great, Malcolm is Great, Family Guy is pretty good, if a little overboard, The Tick was shaping up quite well, 24 isn't perfect, but it's good... but it isn't a comedy, it's a drama, so... drama's are fair game? Then you slight NBC. They have the Law and Order franchise (and the original and SVU are actually really a damn sight better than 24, frankly) and some of the best miniseries on broadcast. West Wing, Crossing Jordan, and ER are too good to dismiss out of hand, especially if you're willing to put 24 on your list. I'm not all that impressed with CBS on Dramas. I mean, "The Agency"? But they had the wisdom to take the free agent CSI, which is really one of the five best dramas in broadcast and syndication right now, as far as I'm concerned. ABC is just plain bad, and UPN, well, I can't even watch Enterprise (and lest you peg me, I have cable entirely because I missed Farscape too much, in spite of my "who has time for TV" attitude.) I really don't watch anything but the first two Law and Order shows (but not CI), CSI, Farscape, Titus, The Tick, Futurama, 24, and Smallville (sorry, I don't know why, but I like it. Probably because of Michael Rosenbaum, who manages to do a weirdly believable road to hell character), and all of those I approach with a tape-it-and-catch-it-later attitude. I'm two months behind on some of them, and that's taking reruns into account. So my habits result in... NBC (2 hours), CBS (1 hour), Fox (2.5 hours), WB (1 hour), and SF (1 hour) Admittedly, my rare extras include Simpsons, Malcolm, and Family Guy. So Fox gets more than the rest. Followed by NBC. ABC gets none of my eyeball time.

    --
    -- Still waiting for the Nike endorsement
  40. Johnen Vasquez vs Ben Edlund by Brand+X · · Score: 2

    Now, I was a fan from the start when I first happened across issue number 3 of The Tick (in the hands of a friend who let me read it) and ended up buying the graphic novel as soon as it saw daylight. I love the humor of the comic, and found the show far more true than the cartoon.

    I've also never seen Invader Zim. Is that what happened to Vasquez after the second issue of "I Feel Sick!"? There was mention of a cartoon, but...

    But there is a world of difference between The Tick and JTHM. The first time I walked into my favorite indie-friendly comic shop (and I still patronize that sort even if it means going 40 minutes out of my way and spending a lot more than I would on subscriptions, because I value their existance, damnit!) and laid eyes on the grotesque and fascinating work that was Johnny, I was blown away. Twisted. Sick. Perverse. Strangely compelling. His world is the polar opposite of The Tick. With the same innocent disconnectedness, but nothing else in common, Johnny sees himself as artist and equalizer, striking out against the "righteous" and popular, the petty and mostly harmless bullies and bureaucrats of his world, sometimes with a spork. And while he terrifies poor Squee (see Squee's own title), he never considers harming the victim of the condescending, the contemptuous, the too-perfect. And somehow, you're never quite sure if Johnen himself is sane, or even safe.

    Now, a show (cartoon, of course) based on JTHM would be... frightening. It would never sell. But... the kid brother of a friend, who I had introduced to JTHM, actually contacted Johnen and got his permission to adapt a play from that same series... and managed to produce and run it at a rather uptight and proper elite high school. And it went over well. Remarkable...

    So, your thoughts... whither bound the properties of The Tick? Will we ever see another show, animated or otherwise? Perhaps a new patron could be found, one willing to give it a real chance?

    For now, I must actually record myself some episodes of this "Invader Zim"... it will be some consolation, at least.

    --
    -- Still waiting for the Nike endorsement