Slashdot Mirror


Mega Public WAN In Sydney

Chris Meder writes: "As posted on CFGN - The Nation , gibed by the recent unreasonable price hikes in Broadband connectivity in Australia, which come already after a strained relationship between Broadband users and the major telco/ISP Telstra BigPond Internet, a group of people in the largest Australian metropolitan city of Sydney have decided to form a city wide amateur wireless network. The team behind this clever idea have also put up a detailed graphical database of people interested and are still looking for more numbers to get this off the ground." This last part reminds me of the Global Access Wireless Database, as featured here. Update: 01/23 18:53 GMT by T : Reader Peter Mann wrote to point out that "there's a mailing list for a similar wireless project in Sydney at http://sydney.air.net.au."

47 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. cripes by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 5, Funny

    i read that as "Mega Public WANG" at first.

    hey, it's the Australians. you just never know.

  2. who will be their provider? by SonCorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are they just going to buy a line from whoever runs the main line linking .au to the rest of the world? is that Telstra? I probably don't understand the situation, but how many companies are there in Sydney that you can buy an internet pipeline from? Just some random thoughts on the subject. Any answers?

    --
    What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    1. Re:who will be their provider? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the link didn't say anything about connection to the Internet as a whole, it seemed to focus more on creating a "humongous LAN".

      Of course, they'll probably get Internet access somehow, whether it's buying a line legitimately or piggybacking on the broadband connections of the few people on it who still buy them.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:who will be their provider? by arsaspe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Telstra isn't the only internet backbone provider in Australia... They are the largest, only because they are the dominant phone company.

      There is also Optus, who provide excellent service and are slowly taking over Telstras business.
      Ozemail/UUNet, sucky, overpriced, but still alive and kicking
      Primus - Small, but I'm pretty sure they have there own link
      There was also one.net, but it recently went broke

    3. Re:who will be their provider? by pbkg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also remember AAPT, which have every single Victorian Government link (or did), as well as a few other major links including Connect.com iirc. Also, Optus has the Southern Cross Link + the AARNET (ATM connection between every uni in Oz).

    4. Re:who will be their provider? by Woko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Primus - Small, but I'm pretty sure they have there own link

      Primus use Southern Cross for some international traffic and split the rest between Optus & Telstra. They run their own exchanges (mainly for voice) in at least Sydney & Melbourne.

      Optus has been spending a small fortune putting fiber between capitals and some regional centers to then onsell to the other telecoms and really cut into Telstra's market.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
    5. Re:who will be their provider? by TeraCo · · Score: 3, Informative
      You are right, the majority of 'wholesale' bandwidth is still owned by Telstra. It is a monopoly, and would be a bad one, if the ACCC weren't watching them for signs of non-competitive behavior. This is why bigpond costs so much, they have to buy their bandwidth from wholesale at the same price wholesale sells it to all of the other ISPs.

      There are very few other carrier grade links coming into Australia [excluding dodgy satellite stuff] it's still mostly owned by Telstra and Optus.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  3. "Open-source" networking by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I commend them for their efforts. This is so much like the spirit of Free software -- if you don't like the way it's being done, then do something about it.

    Great idea, really -- only one person has to get really big files across the wire and then they all share them.

    I predict we'll see a lot more of this if the price of bandwidth doesn't come down soon...

    --

    --
    Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
  4. Ack! by webword · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like an excellent opportunity for an unscrupulous individual. Sounds like a security cesspool to me.

    Maybe I am too jaded. Maybe there is hope!

  5. This isn't the first by yobbo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Melbourne has had it's own wireless network running, as have other cities in australia. Visit air.net.au for an idea of other projects which have been going for much longer.

  6. Question on posibility of advanced networking by chabotc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What could you _realy_ do with a network like this? It seems obvious that a lot of nodes will go on / off, packets will get droped, and the optimal routes will be ever changing.

    Would a good BGP routing setup deal with this? Preferable you would even setup multiple outbound gateways (thru ip-masq if need be for adsl/cable outbound routes)

    Also a nice amount of squid clusters could realy help out here..

    I think that if you would release a complete high-tech network design on this style of setup, you could truely create a decentralised, flexible and unstopable network.

    Now imagine, if they would link up a lot of outgoing gateways (cable, adsl thru ip masq), and allow notebook users to link up @ any location in the city thats within the area covered.

    Add to this some nice ftp mirrors, BBS style websites, and you would have a hackers dream ;-)

    1. Re:Question on posibility of advanced networking by AntipodesTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BGP might help, but BGP requires routers (well, A router, but it has to be able to hold a big subset of the global routing table) and registered addresses on routable networks.

      Unfortunatly, that kind of cost just cant be borne by enthusiasts, without forming an entity that really would become just another ISP. Wireless ethernet cards are one thing. Routers and billing and ISP costs and infrastructure, are something else.

      --
      Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers is, of course, in a state of sin.-John von Neumann
  7. Sydney LAN information by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look here for information on the Sydney LAN.

    --



    --Metrollica
  8. The post .com bandwidth era. by wildcard023 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of this 'we can't make any money on broadband' comes as too much of a shock to me. I mean, we've all known all along how little (if not negative) any given broadband connection pays.

    Say I go home to my cable modem and suck down 2 gigabytes of data on my unmetered line. This isn't so unreasonable technologically. Maybe it'll take me a while to do, but hey, it's not that much of an issue for me. On the other hand, my ISP is now not making any money on me this month. ISPs depend on people getting broadband and looking at a few web pages just like all-you-can-eat sushi places depend on people ordering a few pieces and maybe some maki and going home.

    As downloadable media becomes larger and more proliferic, we're likely to see more and more ISP's either closing down, raising prices, or capping/metering transfers to survive.

    --
    -- Mike wildcard@illuminatus.org
    1. Re:The post .com bandwidth era. by Suidae · · Score: 2

      The only problem I have with rate caps is if they aren't progressive. As long as the rate limits start to kick in after I hit, say, 70% of my monthly data limit, its cool. Then when I hit 90+ it drops again and stays there until next month (or I go to their website and pay for some more bandwidth, which immediately removes my cap).

    2. Re:The post .com bandwidth era. by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3

      Because if you have a thousand users who each transmit a meg a day and say, a couple of gigs a day every so often, you need a lot less infrastructure than if you have a thousand users who all transmit a gig a day every day. You need bigger pipes and better routers at pretty much every step of the way.

      --
      Why?
  9. WONDERFUL! by Restil · · Score: 2

    Need a large scale example of this working, and it might get replicated elsewhere in the world. Doing it wireless means that everyone invests their own share of the infrastructure cost when they get connected, and therefore a single entity isn't hauling around a huge pile of debt while trying to make a profitable business out of it.

    Good luck to these guys.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  10. www.air.net.au by bug1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Correction to the url above

  11. Cool, but be careful by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know this is an amature/not-for-profit project, and I am clueless about Australian law.

    But, I'd highly suggest the core people responsible for the administration of this project incorporate and seek legal counsel. If you search around you could probably find a lawyer to help you pro bono. I definetely recommend this approach for everyone thinking about doing this sort of thing in the US (I know several articles discussing that very thing have been on Slashdot).

    There are significant risks to these individuals, both from individuals utilizing this service, and from the upstream provider who probably isn't aware that its bandwidth is being shared by an entire metropolitan area. When a user is hacked, or the upstream provider finds out these people are breaking the TOS lawsuits will fly.

    This is really cool, and I wish them all the best, just use common sense and get some legal advice.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  12. Default route by AntipodesTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being able to network with all your neighbors is nice, but it wont replace broarband for downloading the latest game patches, mods, mp3s, divx's, etc.

    They could do a deal with an ISP or maybe hook up with something like APANA, but who would pay, and how would fees be collected? As soon as you start involving money, it gets messy. And not many people would be willing to donate their seperate Internet connections bandwidth for other people's default routes.

    --
    Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers is, of course, in a state of sin.-John von Neumann
  13. Internet by redback · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As many people have assumed, it its typically not the purpose of these networks to share internet access, its just a big lan, and everyone has their own pipe, the idea is that you can share files, mabey play some games, all without any bandwith charges, and save your internet connection for things you cant get over the WAN

  14. Shameless whoring by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 4, Informative
    Other private networks exist around Australia, as brought to the collective (and my) attention by [JEB] in this post a couple of days ago.

    Non-exhaustive list:

    Adelaide

    Brisbane

    Gold Coast

    Melbourne

    Mudgee

    Perth

    Sydney

    Western Sydney

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    1. Re:Shameless whoring by DHR · · Score: 2, Informative
  15. It's a WAN by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    It's a WAN (potentially) allowing communications across Sydney, not access to the internet. Useful for chatting to your mates, not surfing the web (unless someone sets up a gateway to the internet).

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  16. Not Alone by The+Dread+Pirate+Rob · · Score: 4, Informative

    Crikey - there's at least four just in Perth!

    Perth: http://www.e3.com.au
    Perth: http://www.innaloo.net
    Perth: http://www.perthwireless.net
    Perth: http://www.lwn.net.au

    Never mind all the others around Oz
    Brisbane: http://www.brishmesh.net
    Melbourne: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org
    Gold Coast: http://www.xtreme.net.au
    Mudgee: http://hwy.com.au/~bigmoe/wlan

    Just to name a few... Do some damn research you Monkeys! Sydney Wireless is just one of at least 20 separate wireless groups in Australia.

    --
    wut?
  17. Great Idea by Tyreth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Projects like this are in the spirit of open source, but even more in the spirit of anarchy. It makes people feel that they have the power to live their lives, and be a partner in a great project rather than a pawn of someone else's project (as is seen in the business world).

    It also encourages co-operation, sharing (in the positive ways the internet does), and community spirit.

    If we could see more projects like this, perhaps internet (or the controls that ISP's and government have over it) will become redundant, and return to the loose connection of computers around the world that it once was.

  18. Re:Free Censorship then? by glwtta · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why is it that so many people think that the internet is censored in Australia? Websites hosted in Australia are, not the net.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  19. Legal advice not necessary if -- by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Legal advice may not be necessary if they never share a broadband pipe, or even a modem, that connects to another ISP, telecom, or whatever.

    The idea I've always promulgated is this: build a new internet using the wireless tech. Eventually lasers or tightly focused beams can provide backbones through which local WANs can communcate.

    The Internet has been taken over by corporations and the guv'mint. The flimsy yet powerful excuses of hackers, child porn and terrorists were enough to get our doors kicked down.

    Damn the Internet, damn the law, and gawd damn the lawyers. Let's bring the joy back to our world again. Get a kilt and some blue paint. Time to moon the emmeny.

    1. Re:Legal advice not necessary if -- by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      by "tightly focused beams" I meant tightly focused radio transmissions, a la the Pringlenet, AKA an 802.11 transmitter in a cylindrical waveguide that can bost the range from feet to miles.

  20. WAN Security by xixax · · Score: 2

    How is it any different to a large DSL install base? You just need to make sure that whatever device people are using to connect themselves to this WAN does sane things like not spewing SMB out over the wire(less). Besides, you had exactly the same issues recently with enterprising geeks cruising around finding open 802.11 sites and that's hardly killed 802.11.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:WAN Security by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to agree with your last point. Despite all the panic, hackers really aren't doing all that much damage. There aren't enough of them, I think, of the proper idiotic mindset.

      The internet existed for years as a network of trusted participants, exposed to attack, but somehow it never was inconvenienced much by such things.

      Let's try building the Alternet, and see what happens. As you say, nothing much so far.

    2. Re:WAN Security by aallan · · Score: 2

      The internet existed for years as a network of trusted participants, exposed to attack, but somehow it never was inconvenienced much by such things.

      ...and back then the proportion of people on the network that knew what they were doing, and would therefore have been able to do serious damage, was alot higher. These days the vast majority of so-called hackers are just script kiddies. They're annoying, but do not pose a serious threat.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  21. Re:Australians seem to have what America had. by FrostedChaos · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let me run that through the teenage-angst resolver script. [WORKING . . . . . .]

    Ah, much better. Here's the plaintext.



    1) I hate the government. Everyone's older than me, and they must be really oppressive or something. And that FBI warning on videocassetes? That's fucking fascist. Duuuuude.

    2) Let's soak the rich. I'm not a communist, but let's kill those capitalist dogs. I'm a comfortable middle class liberal, so I think all people should be like me. Death is too good for the rich; life is too precious to be wasted on the poor. But I will make some token gestures of pity, even while trashing the economy that they, most of all, depend on to live.

    3) If you disagree with me, you're a censor.

    Since I use computers, I feel that society is a giant machine that can be "FIXED" and that problems are only the result of evil and greed, not of fundamental flaws in human nature.


    Hmm... well, all I can really suggest for a case this bad is that you go read a book. Any book.

    --
    "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  22. Looking At The Future by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is absolutly the future of networking. Wireless topology can be constructed so quickly that the types of networks described in the story will flourish. Already several cities around the world have this type of grass roots movment happening in them. The best part about it is that large corporations really can't do anything to stop them. Hopefully it won't be too long before a central repository for information regarding these growing networks springs to life. The speed at which these networks can grow is truly the most important asspect. I suspect in five years or less these types of systems will be so common that one could visit nearly any city with a population over 50,000 and connect to a network.

    1. Re:Looking At The Future by yobbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is one immediate problem with these types of networks. Line Of Sight.

      I, along with many other you hopeful's (who can't afford australian broadband) planned on building a wireless network in my city of Adelaide. We had absolutely no trouble getting enough people to join, but the problem was that in suburban areas it is hard to gain line of sight to other people, because of things such as next door neighbours with 2 storey houses, and trees were also a big problem.

  23. Suppression? How about ridicule instaid? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, Australia a land where prostitution is legal, but putting porn on the internet isn't. Real 'revolutionary' there. The fact of the matter is, what these people are doing is revolutionary, but they're driven to it by an unresponsive government (that continues to support a monopoly). And they certainly aren't doing anything outside of the law. In the US we really don't need anything like this desperately because we have at least a reasonable amount of competition (cable vs DSL at least in most places are almost always controlled by separate companies)

    I mean, this project (though hardly unoriginal in the AU) is cool, but it really has nothing to do with class warfare or anything like that, just botched government regulation and support of a monopoly.

    Anyway, the AU increasingly appears to be a nation ruled by a red-necked majority. Thank god the US has a good constitution to prevent crap like that.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  24. Reminds me by ByteHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of a similer thing in Seattle. http://www.seattlewireless.net

    It's too bad that I don't live close enough to help with it. That would be fun.

    --
    - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
  25. Fibre optics is the way to go by tomas.bjornerback · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wireless is cute, but I still think that wherever possible, cheap fibre optic cables should be used.

    3M's Volition Series is an excellent example -- we used it to get 100 Mbps Internet in our block.

    Combine fast connectivity with a local DMZ to which it is for free to connect and all data traffic within the DMZ is free, and you've got a success on your hands.

    Use wireless only where it is impossible to install fibre optics, but you will be amazed over how many tubes/pipes already present under roads et.c. which can be used with a permit!

    --

    I have 1 Gbps Internet access@home

  26. backbone? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    If you have 10,000 people with a 11mbps link to a single machine with a 11mbps link to the next town, that network is going to suck period. You have got to have some kind of scaliablity and all-wireless is just not going to do it. Sure, wireless to everyone's house is nice, but trying to do the whole thing above ground is just dumb, and a huge waste.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  27. It's happening all over the place... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the UK: Consume http://consume.net/

    In Seattle: Seattle wireless: http://seattlewireless.net

    In New York: NYCWireless: http://nycwireless.net

    etc etc.

    For more info have a look at FreeNetworks: http://freenetworks.org/

    --
    Deleted
  28. Re:This sounds pritty cool... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    The consume network already exists. It's a UK wide project with a lot of nodes in London.

    http://consume.net/

    --
    Deleted
  29. Re:What? by gregorio · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not me who's saying that, that's just how things are, you can seet it here
    You can also find good stuff about it at google.

  30. Re:Suppression? How about ridicule instaid? by Doomdark · · Score: 2
    because we have at least a reasonable amount of competition (cable vs DSL at least in most places are almost always controlled by separate companies)

    You haven't been a broadband user lately have you? The "competition" is practically non-existent now, telcos won, by:

    • Forcefully eliminating real competition (other DSL providers)
    • Creating a peaceful duopoly with cable guys
    About the only thing left is the competition from third sector, and this project is Yet Another Example of these efforts. Good luck for all involved. I think USA could use this just as much as Australia and probably any other country in the world.

    And the last paragraph (regarding "thank god") is pure nonsense. Constitution wasn't designed to assure free trade or competition. It's good for many valuable fundamental rights, but it doesn't have clauses for "taxes suck" or "big co's are ho's and need be controlled"

    --
    I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  31. No, no, don't get the wrong idea. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    1) Well, just about all the 'political' news I hear from down under makes it seem like ignorant rednecks are running the show. Internet and other kinds of censorship, various raciest political parties gaining power, etc

    2) Don't get the wrong idea. American is full of rednecks as well, but we have a good system in place to prevent them from fucking things up to bad.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  32. Erm... 10mps, $10 per *YEAR* by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    They're called dorms, ed.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  33. Re:that's just great. by evilbuny · · Score: 2, Informative

    ok a few pointers, 1 this is an intranet, and all likely hood won't have much if any official direct/indirect internet access as this is a very grey area of the law and the ACA is the likely to stop us any way, however this said, a group in perth have a dsl link to WAIX (western australian Internet eXchange) for local to that location traffic, basicly any ISP/biz linked into that building. Thanks to who ever posted this as the site has recieved an overwhelming response will help trying to convince companies to help sponsor/support our little project. Once we have our first AP up, there will be a testing/meeting day to be announced, so we can all get togeather and really tryout the tech in the area. So stay tuned to http://www.sydneywireless.com for future updates.

  34. I am so sick of this troll by Erris · · Score: 2
    Say I go home to my cable modem and suck down 2 gigabytes of data on my unmetered line ... my ISP is now not making any money on me this month. What absolute bullshit. Your ISP's costs are fixed, not mettered. Typical measured costs are hovering around one cent per ten megs, but that might just mean that people are not moving as much as they could. In any case it's irrelavent.

    What does it really cost to have that network? The Electric utilities seem to do well with much greater capital investment off less money than the phone company collects from you. Think about it.

    Now figure the costs of a wireless network, where the only thing to maintain are a few repeater stations. Oh wait, that's the topic setting up a community owned wireless network to avoid rape by telcos and trolls like you.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.