It's strange that the changelog in.17 says that it won't change the channels on a 6200 yet, but in.16 it says: "A small program (6200ch) has been added to the contrib directory for changing channels on a Motorola DCT-6200 cable box via a 1394 (aka. Firewire) connection. See the README for compile and usage info."
But I can't build a road with $1000 in my pocket. You still haven't made a case for why the government should run a wifi network, instead of the people. Plenty of people are already doing this in places where the incumbents suck, and without taking tax dollars to do it.
It costs you billions to go over verizon/comcast/charter/whoever's head and buy bandwidth directly from a bandwidth wholesaler, and connect it to an access point? Cogent will sell you 100Mb/s of bandwidth for $1000 per month, and voila, you're competing with Verizon without stealing your fellow man's tax dollars.
Lots of denial, without any explanations. We want to know why its all hype and noise, why it's not unusual, and why it's not a signal. In short, what did they realize it was?
"I ask if anyone in the room has ever downloaded or uploaded a movie or TV show in HD quality to or from a P2P network. No one has ever raised their hand."
That's because they're not downloading HD off a p2p network, they're using alt.binaries.hdtv on usenet.
These would probably put you over the legal limit, if you get more than ~5dBi out of them, which you should. Most cheap consumer gear is 15dBm, so 15+5=20dBm=100mW
Your regular analog reception could suck, and still have perfect HDTV. With digital, it's pretty much perfect or nothing. (there are artifacts when you're right on the edge though)
Slashdot Mirror
Same thing in Melbourne, Australia. Citylink costs money, but gets you there quite a bit faster.
they have a working client for pocket pc pda/phones. http://navizon.com/
Wow, you actually got through to Vonage support? All I've got for the past 3 days is a busy signal after going through the menu options.
The article implies that it's preventing community groups as well, but it appears not. See this post on the subject from Alameda Wireless
Know where the most overpopulated place in the world is? No, it's not some 3rd world hell hole, it's Monaco.
It's strange that the changelog in .17 says that it won't change the channels on a 6200 yet, but in .16 it says: "A small program (6200ch) has been added to the contrib directory for changing channels on a Motorola DCT-6200 cable box via a 1394 (aka. Firewire) connection. See the README for compile and usage info."
.17 successfully?
Anyone tried that app with
Funny, I have mine packaged up to be RMA'd right now because half the keys don't work.
But there's already a group in Philly.
But I can't build a road with $1000 in my pocket. You still haven't made a case for why the government should run a wifi network, instead of the people. Plenty of people are already doing this in places where the incumbents suck, and without taking tax dollars to do it.
So if it's not a good idea for people to do it, why is it a good idea for government to take people's tax dollars to do it?
It costs you billions to go over verizon/comcast/charter/whoever's head and buy bandwidth directly from a bandwidth wholesaler, and connect it to an access point? Cogent will sell you 100Mb/s of bandwidth for $1000 per month, and voila, you're competing with Verizon without stealing your fellow man's tax dollars.
Especially since none of the reality shows are actually filmed in HD.
Get a HD decoder card, and put an antenna up then.
...the only guy working on a linux driver for a MyHD mdp-120 card packed up and went on a Mormon quest until Nov. 2005. http://myhd.sourceforge.net/
Lots of denial, without any explanations. We want to know why its all hype and noise, why it's not unusual, and why it's not a signal. In short, what did they realize it was?
"I ask if anyone in the room has ever downloaded or uploaded a movie or TV show in HD quality to or from a P2P network. No one has ever raised their hand."
That's because they're not downloading HD off a p2p network, they're using alt.binaries.hdtv on usenet.
They also moved the long, solo time trial to near the end of the race where it's most likely going to be irrelevant, instead of before the mountains.
These would probably put you over the legal limit, if you get more than ~5dBi out of them, which you should. Most cheap consumer gear is 15dBm, so 15+5=20dBm=100mW
Actually, I'd say the USA got it right the first time. ;)
wow, a glowing blob, what an invasion of privacy.
I think I'd be scared too if I saw a field full of gigantic insects
ahem.
Let us all know where you get Apple 30"'s for $300
Your regular analog reception could suck, and still have perfect HDTV. With digital, it's pretty much perfect or nothing. (there are artifacts when you're right on the edge though)
dctrecord
How many people would insert their tag into the frame before it was sent back? They'd need some kind of encryption to prevent user tampering.