Slashdot Mirror


Non-Apple Buttonless Mouse

MX pointed us to a story about a new buttonless mouse. It's visually quite unique, but they say it's not the ideal gaming device for you real-time-gaming folks. But hey, points for style. I've been using this optical cordless logitech (Blatant ThinkGeek linkage) on my desktop for awhile, although I'm not sure how well it'd work for gaming. When I play, I still use a MS Optical mouse. Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

56 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Tanks by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems like it would be good for implementing a targeting system in say tank simulations. Where you can move the mouse to move the tank, and move your hand on the mouse to move the turret. Also good for 3d modeling as they say

    --
    Photos.
  2. keyless keyboard by lowtekneq · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? and you don't post my story on the keyless keyboard?

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
  3. MS mice by Tet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I still use a MS Optical mouse. Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    Personally, I've never understood why people are so obsessed with MS mice. There's nothing wrong with them, although I think the ergonomics are sometimes designed for show rather than use. But when Logitech discontinued the Pilot mouse, I went out and bought a whole bunch. I've yet to find anything better. MS mice, and newer Logitech mice all lack a full size middle button, and those with wheels impede the use of the middle button. I've never understood why wheel mice didn't have a traditional three button layout with the wheel on the side, being thumb operated...

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:MS mice by baptiste · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have to disagree. While I can't stand MS and the way they behave in the software arena, they can make awesome mice, keyboards, etc. How many of us would give up the wheel? The Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 is hands down the best mouse out there IMHO. It actaully fits my hand, is smooth over any surface, and just has a great 'feel' - plus it looks cool. But even something as plain as a keyboard - their keyboards are still very nice. I always thought shortcut keys on a keyboard were overkill, but now that I use them - I can't live without them (I switch between 2K and Linux and miss the keys when I'm in Linux)

      So I agree with Taco - MS can make a sweet mouse.

    2. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the scroll wheel at first seemed like a great idea, I found out that it is a real ergonomics disaster. I started getting nasty carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms after using the wheel too much, and went back to using the Apple Pro Mouse that came with my Mac. No more unnatural and highly repetitive finger motions...

    3. Re:MS mice by MattRog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can 'click' the mousewheel. Acts as a perfect 3rd button if you change it in the IntelliPoint software. I'll agree with Taco as well -- MS Mice Rox0r!

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    4. Re:MS mice by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      It also works perfectly in X. I have three Logitech cordless desktop (the ones with the "normal looking" keyboard and mouse), and use the third button for paste all the time. The wheel also works in every KDE app with no problem - even better than in Windows, IMO, as the window that you're scrolling dosen't need focus - it just scrolls the pane underneath the pointer.

      Anybody know if the Logitech optical mouses work with the desktops without a seperate reciever? All the keyboards and mice I have "bind" to a reciever, and can then be used in the same room, and can be swapped back and forth (rebind them to a new reciever by hitting connect on both the device and receiever) with no problem. No interference, no crosstalk. These are truely well built pieces of hardware.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:MS mice by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      Why are you missing keys when in Linux? Every key on my keyboard is active including the speaker volume adjust, play, stop (mapped to XMMS), shopping, browser, etc. They all work. You just need to configure them.

      And yes - having shortcut keys is really useful.

      Cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    6. Re:MS mice by eleven357 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would have to disagree due to the fact that I've previously owned an MS Intellimouse Optical. As far as playing q3a went, the mouse jumped here and there, especially annoying when trying to frag. The funny thing was that I always kept my mouse drivers up to date and I still continued to have this problem with the MS Intellimouse Optical. Thats when I decided to trash the MS mouse and go for a Logitech Dual Optical. Now this Dual Optical mouse is the ideal mouse for any of you FPS fans, since if one laser fails to track, the other laser picks up where the other one stopped tracking. I personally like Logitech's Dual Optical as far as optical mice are concerned. And As far as the smooth surfaces go, the Logitech is also alot smoother, and also seems to be more ergonomically correct for my hand. But I guess it all really boils down to personal preference, so get whatever floats your boat!

    7. Re:MS mice by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe you shouldn't be using the scroll wheel so much. I've never had any problems with mine, and never know anyone else who has had any problems. I have it set to scroll 5 lines. I dosen't take much effort to scroll down a few comments.
      If I really need to scroll far. I'll just use the scroll bar.
      I find it no more unatural than moving the cursor over to the scroll bar, or uisng the page down key.
      What kind of mouse did you have? The MS one I have, has a very easy to turn wheel. I have noticed that some are quite clicky/sticky/hard. And I could understand getting CTS if you were using one of them.

      My only complaint about the MS Explorer mouse is that it's too damn bulky. It's not something I realised untill I started to use it. I never used to rest my hand on the mouse. Just grip it with my fingers. The ergonomics can get in the way some times because they must expect you to rest your whole hand on it.

    8. Re:MS mice by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      Yep - thats the article I read and used. There are lots of symbols already predefined in XFree86 4.x - read the comments on that URL talks about setkbdmap.

      For some tricks you need to make use of utilities like XMMS Pipe to fire commands at XMMS from hotkeys. That way you can bind a key like VolumeUp to a command to send a message to XMMS to raise the volume. Similar tricks can be used with other players (like cymbaline which isn't pretty but has random album play).

      Cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    9. Re:MS mice by Progoth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      LOL. Anyone using any sort of "optical" mouse for gaming, isn't really gaming.

      Speak for yourself. I have the logitech cordless optical that taco was talking about, and it's fantastic. I had to turn the sensitivity way down because it is so fine-grained, whereas with my ms mouse I had to turn it way up. it never jumps on me, and the resolution is fantastic. I bought some rechargable NiMH batteries, and I have to say that with those it's almost the perfect mouse. The only problem I have with it is that the buttons are too close together, so I can't have 3 fingers on top. but since I usually only use the wheel for reload/zoom/changing weapons, and that in linux the thumb button also maps to B3, it's great.

  4. Help desk by jACL · · Score: 4, Funny

    User: My mouse doesn't have any buttons? How do I click?
    Helpdesk: Lean left.
    User: What, the buttons are in the seat now?
    Helpdesk: No, lean the mouse left.
    User: But how do I move it around then?
    Helpdesk: Er...put it back.
    User: What if I have to click and drag?
    Helpdesk: Hang on, let me just open up a hardware service ticket.

    --
    "It remains to be seen if the human brain is powerful enough to solve the problems it has created." Dr. Richard Wallace
  5. Not enough memory ... by NWT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Warning: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    Hehe,it seems their webserver is running on a mouse, too :-)

    --
    Life sucks.
  6. Having looked at the mouse... by Tsar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It appears to me that the mouse still has left-right buttons, but they're in the underside of the mouse body, so you have to tilt the entire body to activate a button by pressing the appropriate corner harder against the desk. Cool, but like the man said, you lose some fine control and quick response time.

  7. Mice and gaming. by jidar · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Yeah you definately wouldn't want to be using a mouse like that for gaming. In fact, even using an optical mouse isn't a good thing if you are competing at the world level.

    What you will find if you look into the Pro gamer community (this might sound like I'm kidding, but it really exists: http://www.shackes.com) is that most of them do not like optical mice. They simply don't have high enough sampling rate in most cases. If you turn fast enough with an optical then tend to freak out for a second resulting in your player staring at the floor or sky and spinning. Also, the movements and physics of using an optical are somewhat different. For instance the 'flick' motion that a lot of players have mastered doesn't translate well to an optical.

    Opticals are nice because of their longevity, and low maintenance, but if you're seriuos then ball is still king.

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
    1. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say that the real reason for this is not the inherent superiority of ball mice for gaming but the fact that most very serious (ie Pro and near Pro) gamers learned to play on ball mice. Since the two do feel different, they do not switch for fear of losing some of their edge. Wait for the day when almost all mice are optical - there will be a generation of Pro gamers using them (unless something better comes along first).

    2. Re:Mice and gaming. by debrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is the genuine issue that your parent message brought up - the sampling rate on optical mice is too low to adequately map the expected motions to interpreted motions, and hence the human user performs operations that the hardware does not interpret as the human expected or anticipated.

      The obvious consequence of this is a sharp flick to the right or left which leads to a Quake 3 character staring at the ground for no apparent reason, and subsequent death and loss of the competition. This can be compensated for with extremely, and I mean extremely, high sensitivity, in the order such that 0.5 cm corresponds to your screen resolution in terms of a desktop.

      However, that being said, the human user does not have the physical coordination to operate at that level. As such, until optical resolutions are significantly higher, users of track balls and ball mice will have superior granularity and better correspondence between the expected behavior of the hardware and the actual behaviour of the hardware, irregardless of the skill, training, and habits of the users.

      The advantage is in the correspondence between expected behaviour and actual behaviour, it being much better with track balls and ball mice (which are optical, but in a different way) than it is with optical mice.

      (Just a note - have a look at trackball patterns; it is not a uniform pattern but a miss-mash pattern with form following function)

      Having been one of, and knowing some of, the better Unreal Tournament players in my time, the differences, in not playability but infinitisemal advantages that lead to domination over a long enough time period, are well known and examined. Optical mice do not require a very long time period to assert their inferiority. ;)

    3. Re:Mice and gaming. by debrain · · Score: 2
      It doesn't sound all that unreasonable to make something you're talking about.

      Indeed, it seems that Logitech has attempted to deal with this by using 2 lasers as in the MouseMan (R) Dual Optical, although I could only speculate at the success of this technique.
  8. Microsoft's mice by stevie-boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    I replaced the hideous 'pebble' supplied with my iMac with an MS optical wheel mouse, it's probably the best £30 I've spent on computing kit.

    The Classic MacOS drivers for the extra button and scrolly wheel work without incident and MacOSX has support built in.

  9. my thoughts exactly. by gimpboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    i say the same about nike. who cares if small asian children work 16 hours a day for almost nothing-they sure make good shoes. really though it's called having principles. if you think a company is bad, for whatever reason, you shouldnt do business with that company-not just the part of the company you disagree with.

    mod me down if you want, but i personally dont appreciate the hypocrisy.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:my thoughts exactly. by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
      i say the same about nike. who cares if small asian children work 16 hours a day for almost nothing-they sure make good shoes. really though it's called having principles. if you think a company is bad, for whatever reason, you shouldnt do business with that company-not just the part of the company you disagree with.

      WHOA! How about a little perspective, huh? Is Microsoft doing anything on the level of exploiting third-world children? Sure, they've been convicted of operating an illegal monopoly, but the only folks that got hurt were those trying to sell software of their own. Is this the principle you are trying to follow - fair competition in a regulated market? Does that mean your principles lead you to buy third-party software? Or is your principle that software should be free, and thus you don't care about those other businesses that were shut out? I must admit, I'm not sure what you are talking about, and I can't wrap my brain around any principle that lumps Microsoft's "business practices and operating systems" with Nike's treatment of third-world workers. Or, are you commenting that Nike's new initiatives to help third-world workers are comparable to Microsoft's new initiatives to fix security problems?

      Personally, I'm quite happy about Microsoft's business practices - they resulted in cheap PCs (every PC didn't have to meet IBM's specs, just Microsoft's) and angry programmers, which directly resulted in the Linux operating system. Linux may be putting a free operating system in every computer, but Microsoft put those computers on people's desks - they are like the ugly booster rockets that put the shuttle in orbit.

      BTW, horrible link to NIKEWORKERS.ORG. Like your comments, it assumes everything (that you agree that Nike exploits third-world workers) and explains nothing (no examples of Nike's exploitation). In fact, the only stories in the ABOUT section were old articles about paid endorsers that didn't know about the problems, and the only links in the NEWS section were about Reebok! This would have been a better link.

  10. Lovin' Apple's by piecewise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple's buttonless, (beautiful), optical mouse has been great for me. They say Macs are more productive computers because of the user interface.. I agree.. but I must admit I wasted a lot of time originally just looking at this thing.. it's weird.. the inside of it appears to "float". You can't tell this in pictures but in 'real life' it seems to float. It reminds me of mercury actually, in a sense. The Apple logo inside, especially, floats within it. It's a really great mouse.. and it's connected to a G4 tower, so that ain't bad either!

    Wow, I'm talking about *nothing* and I've still developed a paragraph! Much like my english papers. I'm done now...

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Lovin' Apple's by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      it's weird.. the inside of it appears to
      "float"


      hehe, yeah, I've noticed that too... it looks like a polished piece of black stone suspended within the mouse... the keyboard is sort of that way as well... funky mostly-clear styling, with the wires and chips somehow hidden. Neat stuff! My desk is pretty wild with my Apple LCD, keyboard, and mouse... plus my "speckled granite" Silicon Graphics 21" CRT, keyboard, and mouse.

    2. Re:Lovin' Apple's by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      why on Earth did SGI get rid of their "speckled granite" monitor and keyboard finish

      No kidding, nothing says "Dell" like a black monitor/keys/mouse setup and "sgi" in lame white paint. Ugh. Thankfully the Octane2 (and maybe the Fuel) work fine with existing granite accessories. Too bad there was never a granite FD Trinitron monitor.

  11. Microsoft Hardware by neema · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice."

    Difference being is this. Microsoft software is made, mostly, within Microsoft. Microsoft hardware is hardware someone else makes and they just slap on a label onto it.

    Microsoft hardware is actually really good, and the support for it is amazing. My optical mouse was tweaking out for some reason, so I called them and they sent me another one by the next day. They didn't require me to send in my old one. It probably didn't cost them much anyway, but it was still a cool gesture.

    1. Re:Microsoft Hardware by ianezz · · Score: 2
      Microsoft hardware is actually really good

      It may be true about mice and joysticks, but the keyboards they resell are really of the ``el cheapo'' kind. Nothing really comparable to a good old IBM PS/2 (see here and here) or a Keytronic (see here).

    2. Re:Microsoft Hardware by grumbly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Difference being is this. Microsoft software is made, mostly, within Microsoft. Microsoft hardware is hardware someone else makes and they just slap on a label onto it.

      Ohhh.. SO close. You are almost correct in saying that someone else makes but what you really mean is that someone else manufactures it. MS does all its hardware design in house (mice, keyboards, joysticks, games pads...) and then subcontracts out the manufacturing.

  12. It's been done by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Buttonless mice have been available for ages. This is not a new thing.

    Check it out.

  13. MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ever since I first saw them, I have oned a few MS Optical Mice. For some reason, MS Hardware is damn fine division. I had a faulty Intellimouse Optical, got a new one replaced, no charge. Had the smaller white one faulty, replaced, no charge. I now own 2 of the small, one of the large Grey ones...love my technical referrals? I also own the Logitech cordless optical mouse and cordless keyboard. First off , Optical is the way to go. Secondly, MS is good at hardware. Thirdly, Support is great for both W2K and Linux, no hassles anywhere. Except for programming those extra buttons for the logitech keyboard in Linux. Oh well, maybe someday I'll figure out the keycodes and write a little hack to make the buttons work.

    I would like to try this no button mouse, when I am working (coding) I occassionally get serious serious hand pain (no jokes..lol).

    It will last for days and is quite painful. All of us in tech jobs, spending long hours at computers should take a serious look at ergonomics. Also, your employer should pay for upgrading your chair, keyboard and mouse if you feel pain with your current setup. It's your health, your future, hell, go out and buy what you want and throw the bill at your boss if you're in pain (not literally throw it, figuratively). I would in fact suggest sitting down with your employer and going over ergonomics and how it can effect employee productivity.

    Maybe some of these links would be helpful:

    Design/Layout
    Ergonomics - A Practical Guide
    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Computer Related Repetitive Strain Injuries

    I am gonna buy one, the tiny little muscles used in your hands to click the mice buttons place a huge strain on your arm over a period of time. It may not bother you now, but let's talk in 20 years....

    1. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by IceFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Before you blast me, here me out. I had wrist problems and tried a number of different mice. I have a little collection of mice in storage now. You know what one did more (for my wrists that is) then any other one? A trackball. And when you think about it you can relize why. With a normal mouse you mover your wrist all around, but with a trackball you use your thumb for everything. This drematicly reduces the amount of stress on your wrists. Granted it took me two weeks to be able to master it and another month to get my gimp skills back, but it was worth it. Unfortunetly for you lefties it is a little harder to find a trackball, but give it a shot.

      As for keyboard I ended up getting a Kinesis, but that is for another post.

      As for desk I built my own to match my height so my wrists are in the least amount of pain. (90 angle at elbo)

      -Benjamin Meyer

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    2. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
      Superior in terms of overall usage, comfort level and my personal opinion. Sure hardware sometime goes out faulty (little loose wires etc). Superior customer service, a phone call and reciept cleared up the problem. They paid for shipping and sent me a brand new mouse. This is the real world, things happen and sometimes hardware is defective. The question then comes down to, how does the company treat me as a customer if there is a problem? No horror story here, they were excellent. Now well more than a year later, all mice still run perfectly.

      Might have been a bit vague, but I thought my point was made, sorry if it was not.

      Still goes to my end point, the hardware is great. If something happens and it breaks due to manufacturer defect, they should replace it, and they did. So yes, it is a fine example.

      I'm just sitting here wondering why you come off sounding like a knob?

    3. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2

      Cool, last time I tried to mess with keyboard mappings was when I had my iBook...thanks for the info!

    4. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2

      I have never actually gone the way of the trackball. Whenever I tried them, they did the same as you say, felt clunky and I just couldn't get myself to adjust. If I do stuff in the gimp or any other image editing type app, I'll fall back to my Wacom writing tablet. After using a tablet, mice seem really crude. But I might try out a trackball, since they aren't all together too expensive...

    5. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by boopus · · Score: 2

      I'll seccond the Trackball! I've had most versions logitech has made in the past ten years, and every one has been worth the (sometimes) expensive price. I'm currently using the Wireless Optical Trackball, and it makes all the difference. Want to read slashdot? Lean back your chair back, put your feet up, and hold your mouse on your lap and really relax. It's well worth the double AA battery each month.

      There does seem to be a learning curve for them, but unfortunatly I can't comment as I was young enough that "it just seemed natural" to start using it. As long as you've got something else for gaming(and in the days of USB, you aren't limited to just one pointing device), I really recomend them.

    6. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      Not everyone can use a trackball, at least without a lot of training. It requires a great degree of motor control in the thumb that some of us just don't have.

      For me at least, using a trackball is like typing with my elbows.

    7. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
      Possible that that's the cause, but let's be realistic here. I also owned a Blueberry iBook, had it for about 20 months and an internal IDE cable broke on it. It didn't physically break, every OS on the face of the planet would simply not recognize any HD at all. Apple wanted a crapload of $$ for a repair, 500US just to look at it.

      Now, I wouldn't go and jump on any bandwagon and start saying Apple makes *crap*, because I think they make good stuff. I still have my original Apple //c downstairs from when I was younger and it's still working. I was highly disappointed that Apple wanted so much just to pop it open and look.

      Anyhow, when I mentioned 'superior', it has been superior in terms of usability and comfort compared to anything I have used. Now the trackball has come up, I'll try it. I already mentioned the Wacom Tablet. So, yes, the large grey intellimouse has been the best so far, but hey, I'm not closed minded about trying new things. Unlike many who would love to bash the intellimouse line and hardware simply because it is somehow associated with MSFT. But then again, this is slashdot.

  14. /. ed by kevinqtipreedy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow it seems like whenever there is a good story not on cnet.com only the first 3 people can get to it. It takes 5 people to make a conspiracy: slashdot, osdn, the site that gets ./ed, me, and you. There is only one solution, well besides everyone upgrading hardware/bandwidth incase they get slashdoted, and thats to get even. What goes around comes around, so we should all slashdot slashdot. So everyone follow this link check out this awesome story online at http://www.slashdot.org !!!!!!

  15. Should be rats not mice by jonathanjg · · Score: 2, Troll

    I still contend that such products although good, should still be referred to as "microsoft rats"!

    1. Re:Should be rats not mice by Fweeky · · Score: 2

      Why? Rats are smarter, cleaner, less smelly and make much better pets than mice.

      Oh, wait, Microsoft mice rule, rats rule.. I see it now :)

  16. Focus, people! :-) by seldolivaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taco posts a story about a new mouse, and includes a one-line comment mentioning MS Mice. Result: a thread of replies almost entirely about Microsoft mice, Microsoft hardware, and MS's business practices. And 3 about the actual mouse :-)

    1. Re:Focus, people! :-) by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      Well, Taco has a good point though!

      I hate Microsoft with a passion. I run Linux.

      However, I have a Microsoft mouse, and I have to admit it's a fine mouse! It's well designed, comfrotable, reliable, never sticks or anything.

      Windows is of course pure shit.

  17. Microsoft Hardware by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Anyone else notice that Microsoft's best (or perhaps, only decent) products are their hardware offerings? It's amazing what they can offer when they outsource most of the design and manufacturing to someone that knows what they're doing. Microsoft I/O gizmos and the XBox show that Microsoft does know how to assemble a team that is not afriad to hire outsiders to design and build a good product.

    Now if only their Windows versions of Office took some cues from the Mac versions and became less of a disk/ram/cpu hog.

    Off to download the latest 18 MB security service pack for Outlook... man am I glad I only own one Windows PC...

  18. Re:All hail the wheel... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    Ever find yourself stroking the spot between the left and right mouse button on a mouse without a wheel?

    ALL the time, and practically EVERY time I've got a non-wheel mouse in my hand. I never thought that such a little addition could be so addictive. The first time I was with one, I found it a bit of a nusance. Not 1 day later I had a "normal" mouse in my hand, and found myself rubbing the mouse where the wheel shoud've been.

    I ran into the samething with the M$ Natural Keyboards. There was one sitting around the office that no one wanted to use. I figured "what the hell" and tried it. I yelled at that thing for 2 days straight. I finally got fed up enough and put a "normal" keyboard back on my box. I couldn't use it! After that, I plugged the Natural back in and ordered one for home. I've been using a Natural ever since. That was like 2 years ago. ( I HATE the cursor keys on the newer Naturals, but ALL pain in my wrists totally went away after using the Natural. I think that out-weighs a bit of annoyance (and a few extra times of getting fragged... :-) ).

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  19. usability not so great by markj02 · · Score: 2
    MS mice are flashy and comfortably shaped for many hands. But MS has trouble with basic usability issues: the scroll wheel is not a very good controller for scrolling in actual experiments.

    Now, about those Windows shortcut keys, if you want to use them in Linux, there is nothing stopping you. You can bind them to whatever kind of menu, modifier, or action you want.

  20. I don't know why... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    ...I find this stuff funny. From the site linked:

    Warning: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    ERROR: Unable to connect to database.


    :-) Boom goes the box.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  21. The Mouse by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since i haven't seen a single post that was on topic, i'd like to actually talk about the mouse.

    Obviously I haven't used one, but I don't see what problem they're trying to solve with this leaning instead of clicking thing... it seems to me that that would be even worse for your wrist after repetitive use, and judging from the other mice on the companies website, they're not exactly masters of ergonomics or industrial design.

    This does bring up a question I've wondered about, though; if Apple offers their own 2-button scroll wheel mouse, what will it look like. The last time we heard rumors that they were designing one was back during the days of their hockey-puck mouse, so the mouse would have had the fruit and ice design scheme. I must say Apple's current no button clickable mouse is beautiful, even though I use my Logitech Cordless Optical Mouse most of the time, I keep it on my desk for the prettiness factor (the Logitech isn't bad though, it almost perfectly matches the colors of a graphite G4 tower, it just can't hold a candle to a translucent black oval floating above your desk ;).

    Of course, there's no guarantee Apple will ever make a two-button mouse, but I don't think you can rule out the possibility that they might start at least including them with Power Macs. Apple has admitted that many of their customers need the extra button and scroll wheel, particularly gamers; when Apple furnished Power Macs for QuakeCon, they came with 3rd party two button mice, and you'll wonder how you ever used the Mac OS X Finder with a one-button mouse once you switch.

    So I think there is plenty of motivation, although they would probably keep the present mouse on the iMacs (the iMacs now actually use a special mouse with a white bubble instead of a black one, ditto for the keyboard). So my question is what would it look like? Hopefully nothing like this one from Green, in form or function, but how do you make a mouse as stunning as the current one with buttons and a scroll wheel breaking up the design? Would be a very different design, but the new towers might see a very new design sometime soon as well, and they might take that opportunity to switch keyboard and mouse designs ont the pro products as well, after all, is Apple going to use the same style they've had since the G3 when they start making 5th gen towers.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  22. Re:RSI prevention by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
    I agree with your 3 button comment. I was actually expecting someone to flame with why I wasn't using vi in text mode :)

    I am a lefty, but now that I think of it, I never acutally tried using my left hand to control the mouse. So, here I am trying to do it...I feel like I do when I try to write with my right hand. Pretty klunky and having trouble getting used to it. But certainly a thought....

  23. Re:cross refrencing sneaky advertising? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Could you please link to the relevant statements from RMS and ESR stating that they aren't in favour of people making money. I must have missed them.

  24. Re:All hail the wheel... by Nick+Number · · Score: 2

    WTF? I chose Poland, and a girl in her bra shows up on the Polish Logitech site.

    Well, I'll be darned. It doesn't have that pic for any of the other countries, though the German page has a picture of a scantily-clad man and woman lounging under an ad for their iFeel Optical. Verrry subtle.

    --
    Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
  25. Logitech Mouseman Wheel optical by asv108 · · Score: 2

    I purchased a mouseman wheel optical when they first came out a couple of years ago. I've been very pleased with this mouse. It has 4 buttons + wheel, which is surely enough for anyone. The design is very comfortable, plus if you look at Intellimouse Explorer it appears to be very similar in design to the mouseman. Another cool feature of the mouseman, is the blue LED that is USB powered. It looks really cool in the dark too. I've looked at the newer wireless mice, but I have no reason to go wireless plus it isn't the same form factor as the mouseman wheel.

  26. Buttonless ergonomics - one person's experience by victim · · Score: 2

    I have to give a big thumbs up to buttonless mice. I've been fighting an RSI in my mouse hand for a couple of years. Since I've switched to a buttonless mouse it has cleared up entirely. I highly recommend anyone with mouse hand problems try one.

    It is an apple mouse. You don't miss the buttons under Mac OS, I run about half the time in X and I've just learned to use the extra modifier keys to get the other buttons. It becomes automatic after a day.

    (Not that I'm a clicking fiend, the injury probably originated while playing a string of shows with a bluegrass band. 240 notes/minute, 80/finger/minute on the right hand for three hours a day is a lot of finger pulling for a bass player. I had to stop doing that, but the hand didn't heal until I switched mice.)

  27. Logitech wireless optical by darkwhite · · Score: 2

    (I don't work for logitech.)

    I've been using it for almost a year now (bought it when it came out). It is wonderful. I've been playing all kinds of games with it, tried my friend's Razor Boomslang, this is definitely better. I like the shape, although I suspect some of the bigger mice (like MS Optical) may be more comfortable for the hand. Batteries work for two or three months (I use rechargeable so it's more like a month and then I spend 5 seconds replacing them with charged ones). Doesn't need a pad, doesn't collect residue like ball mice. Windows detects it as a standard HID device, so no drivers needed. Not bad at all, I say it's definitely worth the money.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  28. Re:One Button Why? by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Read the link please. The style is similar to the Apple Pro mouse except instead of a single click action you lean the mouse to the left for a left click and lean to the right for a right click. The only thing thise mouse lacks in comparison to a regular optical mouse is a scroll wheel which would drive me batty like my Apple Pro mouse does on my Powerbook. I know a scroll wheel doesn't look as asthetic but PLEASE reading a long web page without a scrool wheel (or PDF document) is madness.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  29. Re:All hail the wheel... by cluening · · Score: 2

    That's one of Micros~1's monopoly tactics: make protocols that are close to normal ones, but just different enough that one can't use both, and make hardware that acts the same! :)

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
  30. Been done before... by Bazman · · Score: 2

    Here's a really useful buttonless mouse, the Stupidamouse.