Slashdot Mirror


Augmented Reality: Enhanced Perception

Webratta writes: "Can you imagine wearing glasses or goggles that, when looking at a person, a built-in display would tell you everything you wanted to know about that person? According to an article in Popular Science the day of cyborg-like enhanced perception could be closer than we imagined. Just imagine the privacy concerns stemming from this..."

66 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Privacy issues - not necessarily by nakhla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The privacy concerns depend on where the information comes from. If it comes from a centralized database, then yes. But, if the user (the owner of the goggles) chooses the information to assign to a person then there aren't any big concerns. For instance, I could choose to display their name, birthday, wedding anniversary, and their favorite restaurant. It would be information that I already know, this would just allow me to access it more readily. In a way, it would act like a face-recognizing entry in my PDA, brining up all of the information I've already collected about that person.

    1. Re:Privacy issues - not necessarily by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it would act like a face-recognizing entry in my PDA

      Link it via bluetooth to your PDA and it could remind you of meetings that you're meant to have with the person you've just met face-to-face. You could conveniently re-schedule the meeting to have right now instead. I'd certainly like that, because countless times I've been too submersed in whatever project I'm working on to think about the more real-world things, and I often program things into the organizer on my phone to remind me to go and see someone, etc. This could pop-up a message in front of me saying "Reminder: You are to talk to this person about project xyz at some point today". Thinking of it this way, it could be good for members of the non-geek community who have problems with their memory too.

    2. Re:Privacy issues - not necessarily by msheppard · · Score: 2

      Once you start walking around with a system that shares the information, then there are privicy issues. And I see this being inevitable. You can't stop people from noticing that you're smoking a butt, and you note it, and share that info... where can you disconnect this? It's kind of like a P2P rumor/gossip implmentation. You can no sooner stop people from gossiping than restrict technology which makes it more widespread.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    3. Re:Privacy issues - not necessarily by anacron · · Score: 2

      For instance, I could choose to display their name, birthday, wedding anniversary, and their favorite restaurant. It would be information that I already know, this would just allow me to access it more readily. In a way, it would act like a face-recognizing entry in my PDA, brining up all of the information I've already collected about that person.

      If you have already personally collected that much information about the person then you probably know them well enough not to need a face-recognition software to pull that information up.

      I think the real value in having a display like this is for Location Based Services. Want to see a movie but don't know where one is? Just overlay all the theatres in a 20 minute walk with what they're playing and next showtime. If you're driving, the HUD can give you advance warning signs that there's unseen traffic ahead. Thinking a bit further into the future, imagine having the outline of the road you're on highlighted -- so dark roads become just as safe as fully illumated ones.

      Also imagine being able to stand in the middle of a city, look around you and see the menus of the restaurants you can see. Or real-time table availability. That restaurant has a 40 minute wait? No problem -- the one over there has immediate seating.

      The crutch to all of this, of course, is how to pull that type of information. Web Services is a step in the right direction, but now combine it with the power of P2P (see Jini, JXTA, Groove.net or LimeWire) and automatic device and network discovery and you have a real killer app.

      Miniaturization would allow all of this data to be fed into contact lenses, so you get a permanent, "augmented" view of the world. What a great thing.

  2. Dating by jaavaaguru · · Score: 4, Funny

    That could make dating so much more reliable for us geeks. Just think what it would be like if you already knew that she shared the same interests, etc. You could probably have built in web access to these things too and check out her online profile. Oh wait... we're probably already sitting in front of our computers looking at her profile before we attempt dating anyway :-)

    1. Re:Dating by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      How is that an abuse?

    2. Re:Dating by smnolde · · Score: 2

      But for the real women we must ask, "Are those real or fake?"

    3. Re:Dating by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      Who was it who said, "Life would be much easier if everyone's IQ was tattooed on their forehead."?

    4. Re:Dating by chialea · · Score: 2

      There are advantages to dating guys with geek toys. For example, this means that I have wireless at my place, his place, the CS department at Berkeley, and my parent's place.

      The specs seem like they'd be more of a problem. If he doesn't want to focus his attention on ME and what I'm telling him while having a conversation, that isn't much of a conversation, is it? Doesn't make for much of a relationship, does it? Now, I need time to work and play by myself just as much as the next gal/guy (or even more so when I'm carrying a graduate courseload, plus the rest of an undergraduate's, plus research), but mixing it with the glasses is just not a good idea.

      Lea

    5. Re:Dating by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      : WARNING: Subject currently in menstruation cycle

      Or:

      Host has entered runlevel 0.

    6. Re:Dating by DrCode · · Score: 2

      I think humans already come with this capability builtin. Briefly, look directly at her eyes.
      If:

      1. She looks away, she's probably not interested.
      2. She looks back, smiling slightly, she might be interested.
      3. She looks back and glares, she's definitely not interested.
      4. She looks back and glares, then whispers something angrily to the 250-lb guy with his arm around her, you better fade into the crowd.

  3. Reality by onion2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walk down the street, look at the world. This is reality.

    You've lost me.. what is this thing? Is it new? </geek>

  4. "Just imagine the privacy concerns" by Gannoc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have this image of a dark and cold future, where you can simply look at a friend, a co-worker, a stranger. Then by merely making a certain microgesture with your eyes, can instantly bring up a list of what kind of porn they download.

    I pray I don't live to see it.

    1. Re:"Just imagine the privacy concerns" by onion2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interviewer: Why do you want to work for the police force.. oh.. I see you like the uniforms..

  5. Instructions by GSV+NegotiableEthics · · Score: 5, Funny
    Can you imagine wearing glasses or goggles that, when looking at a person, a built-in display would tell you everything you wanted to know about that person?
    • Take normal pair of shades
    • Take sticky label
    • Write "Not for you, she won't" on label
    • Put sticky label on inside of shades.
    • Hand shades to the male geek of your choice
    1. Re:Instructions by Explo · · Score: 2


      Can you imagine wearing glasses or goggles that, when looking at a person, a built-in display would tell you everything you wanted to know about that person?


      I wonder how long it would take for someone to create a little nice program that can approximate how the person would look without clothes and run it on the goggles ;)

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
  6. privacy? by sahala · · Score: 2
    Is privacy a huge concern? Would this be any more of a privacy intrusion than someone walking around with a networked laptop doing google searches (and other lookups) on everyone?

    Personally I think it would be more of a social intrusion, as in "ugh...it's that white faced geek again". Sorta like when wireless ethernet hit my old college campus (cmu.edu) and people started checking email in the middle of a movie (as in, an annoyingly bright view of someone's window manager).

    Nonetheless it has its cool factor, although I would look at some of the more productive applications.

    1. Re:privacy? by GSV+NegotiableEthics · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nonetheless it has its cool factor

      Yeah, real cool, and useful!

      Look at those screenshots. The restaurant has a text label superimposed over it, so the wearer can just read the label instead of the sign above the restaurant! No more messy reality for me!

  7. Oh joy. Yet another form of advertising. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You *know* that one of the first things that they'll do if this stuff ever becomes popular is to sell virtual advertising space. Adverts won't just be static billboards. They'll jump out at you.

    --
    Deleted
  8. a deepness in the sky by patmfitz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A well-realized use of this technology was presented in the book "A Deepness in the Sky" by Vernor Vinge. Of course the technology was such that people didn't have to wear external hardware to take advantage of it.

    One of the more interesting uses was allowing someone else to temporarily take control of your display - no more damn powerpoint slides at meetings!

    And imagine the military uses - targeting computers built into your field of vision, zoom in with enhanced vision, etc.

    1. Re:a deepness in the sky by andr0meda · · Score: 2

      Actually there's another book called SnowCrash by Neal Stephenson, which also has some sort of immersive virtual reality concept. Agents working for various agencies gather intel info in order to be able to compete with each-other.

      The website also suggests that once databases are going to be linked, new contact with strangers about your (or their) matters will no longer amount to 'surprise' or offensive. In fact what you see no longer will be believable in the sense that people might have tampered with the metaintel you are seeing. You are also more vulnerable to sneak attacks or surprises. You depend on technology to stay alive. You depend on agencies to protect and double-check and verify your data. I Automatically get the reflex to say that hacking would mean freedom of mind in such a datadriven world.

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  9. A better use. by satanami69 · · Score: 2

    Someone should change these into the Simpson's beer goggles. That way when I look at someone, I see everything I want, not everything I need to know.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
  10. How to find a date... by TonyJohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What you really want is for the other person's head up display to be monitoring their iris. If they look at you and their pupil dilates, when it adds an entry into their database to this effect. If you then look at them, your head up display displays a set of red cross-hairs for a possible target...

    Thinking about it, this could create something of a Cupid's Arrow Effect. Say you are looking at someone in a room and the lights go out - instantly you end up targetted in their display.

    Maybe a more reliable system would be needed, but it sure would be interesting.

    otoh, how attractive can a person be wearing goggles?

    TJ

    --
    Owl tried to think of something wise to say, but couldn't.
    1. Re:How to find a date... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny
      how attractive can a person be wearing goggles?

      Well, when I'm wearing my beer goggles, most women are pretty attractive...

  11. New Scientist Article by jsmyth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminded me of HUD technologies (with AWACS support), where when a plane's radar picks up another plane, the HUD shows its location with a square, and various other information appears, generated from the AWACS feed, or other embedded signals in the radar (for friend/foe recognition etc.)

    There's an interesting article in New Scientist about similar technology, used to "supplement" what your eyes can see. A guy from the Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics in Rostock has come up with a "Virtual Showcase" that has the target artefact in, and then with the aid of special goggles the wearer sees a superimposed image, with a likely representation of what the artefact may have looked like originally.

    You can find the link here
    (http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/tech/arti cl e.jsp?id=99991959&sub=Hot%20Stories)

    --
    jer

    We may be human, but we're still animals
    - Steve Vai
    1. Re:New Scientist Article by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      Yeah, just wait until the the geek next to you starts yelling "VAMPIRE! VAMPIRE! BOGEY AT 3:30 CLOSING AT 5 KNOTS! ARM ALL TORPEDOES".

      Then see how fast you pretend they're just reading glasses.

      Personally, I wanna be that guy in the IBM commercial sitting in the middle of a Venecian square scaring all the pigeons.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  12. Goes both ways by robinjo · · Score: 2, Funny

    But she could also find out that you're a geek and run for her life.

    Oh, wait. They can spot that easily already now...

  13. Re:Requirements by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

    I would also like to see 6502 assembly listings scrolling by.

  14. Back to the Future 2 by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    Hmm... sort of like in Back to the Future 2 when they were using the video phones. On the bottom of the screen was listed the other persons' likes, vices, etc. I wouldn't mind knowing a girl's vices before I walk up to her in a bar. :)

    Of course, I'm also still waiting for video phones. The best part of that scene? At the end when the show the AT&T logo and say something like "This call brought to you by AT&T". By 2015, it'll probably be "This call brought to you by AOL Time Warner Sony Viacom Verizon".

  15. Have you heard of Steve Mann? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's almost completely the father of wearable computing. He wore a pair of glasses and a "keyboard" interface everywhere he goes, and worked for MIT media lab. People who have met him say he seemed more intelligent than he actually is, because his vision sensors send information back to the lab which he can route to others for aid in identification, and he asked questions on the LAN IRC (I don't think they actually use that protocol) and got the answers from the minds of MIT. Its as though he can answer any question.

    His page is at the University of Toronto now, and those glasses he's wearing are exactly the ones that I mentioned - at least, they're the fourth draft of the ones I mentioned.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Have you heard of Steve Mann? by Mr.+Quick · · Score: 2

      Steve went to McMaster U for his undergrad degree. Here's a little info on what he did. That picture from '87 is classic.

      two years ago he did a talk on his research. it was great. although, he was quite awkward and it appeared as if he had little patience for questions. he might have been having a bad day, but the question period after was very tense.

      nevertheless, he adds alot of credibility to my school.

    2. Re:Have you heard of Steve Mann? by Quixote · · Score: 2

      When he was an undergrad, he had wired up his undies to a humidity sensor. If the sensor detected that he was sweating, it turned up the A/C in the room.
      Of course, being a geek, there can't be any other reason for him to start sweating, right? ;)

  16. This is old news.. by wfrp01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've been able to buy these glasses from Marvel Comics for decades now.

    --

    --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
  17. Everything you wanted to know? by Indras · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you imagine wearing glasses or goggles that, when looking at a person, a built-in display would tell you everything you wanted to know about that person?

    What about the stuff you don't want to know? Here are some things I wouldn't like to know about someone I walk by in the local mall:

    Bisexual, but won't admit it
    Enjoys viewing squirrel porn scenes
    Works for Microsoft
    Has severe case of explosive diarrhea
    Etc...

    --
    The speed of time is one second per second.
  18. Somebody read Virtual Light, I'd say by jimfrost · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is basically what Gibson's glasses did in _Virtual Light_. Not really a new idea. jim

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
    1. Re:Somebody read Virtual Light, I'd say by cruelworld · · Score: 2

      Or even before that the gargoyles in Snowcrash.

      Of course they were rightly considered the biggest nerds around. The analogy was the same as people who had slide-rule belt holsters.

    2. Re:Somebody read Virtual Light, I'd say by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      Yes, except the "Virtual Light" glasses in the book interfaced directly with the optic nerve, rather than painting the retina with light.

      We have a ways to go until we catch-up.
      Besides, you wouldn't want a pair of those anyway, you'd just have Warbaby and the Russians chasing you around all over.

  19. What is it with the privacy concerns? by Psiren · · Score: 2

    Every other damn story on here ends with, "but what about the privacy concerns?". Is that all people have to worry about now? Yeah, the Microsoft thing is done with, they're bad, we know it, lets move on to whining about something else. Oh yeah, privacy, that'll keep us going for a year or two. Sheesh.

    1. Re:What is it with the privacy concerns? by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

      Umm, aren't you forgetting all the ones ending with "now let's figure out how to get Linux running on it"? Hmm, which gets me to thinking, what would be the privacy concerns of getting Linux running on it?

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  20. Communication ? by mirko · · Score: 2

    Can't you just ask the person for such details ?
    The problem, IMHO, is that this may reduce the communication between people.
    Also, how exhaustive is the collected info ?
    Maybe this could be useful for some guardians willing to authentify incoming visitors but else, well, I don't perceive this invention, however breathtaking, technically speaking, as a step toward the right direction which is making people happy to co-exist.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  21. kind of reminds me of... by mirko · · Score: 2

    ...the z80 assembly listings appearing in the Terminator's sights...
    How will they make such information compact enough to be useful and not dangerous (I don't want to have 2KB oftext to read while driving) ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  22. More pics, background infos.. by Lispy · · Score: 2, Informative

    i bet youd have figured this out by yourself, but a link is always nice ;-)
    So check out the
    official page

  23. Car HUD by mattbelcher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Motorists could put these things to especially good use. A Heads-up display like in fighter planes could point out road hazards and relative vehicle speeds. Instead of a rear-view mirror, a semi-transparent projection of the view from the rear could be called up with a little press on the steering wheel. In conditions of low-visibility, the HUD could enhance the lane dividing lines and point out other traffic indicators. Of course, maybe we'll just have cars that drive themselves before we get that far.

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  24. Already in use. by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Boeing has been using augmented reality for some time now to help the people who are wiring up the new airplanes. The glasses project the relevant portion of the wiring diagram over the section that the worker is looking at.

    All of the various privacy concerns are unfounded at the moment. The large challenge with any AR system is to figure out what you're looking at. For it to work with people you would either need some kind of facial recognition system built-in or the person would have to be willingly broadcasting a location AND identity signal to be used by such a system.

    Personally, I think the best Sci Fi example of this stuff is in California Vodoo Game. In this case Niven and Barnes used AR to deal with the fact that the previously expected Star Trek hologram technology hasn't been able to catch up to "reality" yet. The neat thing about that was that you had the combination of AR and MMORPG technology blended together to make LARP'ing really fun. (If you couldn't decipher all of those acronyms than you probably wouldn't be interested anyway.)

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Already in use. by Erasei · · Score: 2

      For it to work with people you would either need some kind of facial recognition system built-in or the person would have to be willingly broadcasting a location AND identity signal to be used by such a system.

      That makes a lot of sense though, when you think about it. A short range broadcast would be a great idea. IF, and only IF, it could be turned off. If you are among friends, or in a single's bar, you switch it on, and vilo.. if you are out on the street, you switch it off, and no one is the wiser.

      --
      visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
  25. Gaming Interface for Ease of Use by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Part of what makes the mind so efficient is the filtering process. So at some point, you would have a filter so that to do not get overwhelmed with data.

    I Imagine that the interface would have to be something familiar that most geeks can deal with.

    I suggest a gaming interface like Doom. There was that admin tool for killing off zombie processes. Something similar could be used to symbolically represent the people you meet. Bill Gates As Satan, for Example.

    Of course, you would have different patches depending on your tastes and opinions.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  26. Cyberpunk by ksw2 · · Score: 2

    This has been a popular thing in cyberpunk fiction. Gibson's Virtual Light was centered around just such a set of glasses... and I remember the gargoyles in Stephenson's Snow Crash had the same things... laser would scan your retina from a distance, reference all your information from a database...

    Wow, am I a geek or what...

  27. Popular Science == Popular Hucksterism by swb · · Score: 2

    I've been laughing at Popular Science since I was a kid at the barber shop (and this was over 25 years ago, kids). Without fail, every article has an "artists conception" of some outrageous new technological innovation that's just around the corner! -- super vaccines, military of the future, cruise ships the size of cities, rocket planes, and so on. The only thing they seem to leave out is ESP.

    I'm sure many of the stories really do represent new applications for halfway-grounded-in-reality technology, but they extend it so far beyond reality. It'd be amusing to take 20 year old popular science cover stories and see what percentage even remotely resemble developed technologies.

    1. Re:Popular Science == Popular Hucksterism by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that I wrote that before even seeing that Time Travel!!! was their cover for this month. Figures. I hope they have an artist's conception of a scientist from the future talking to Abraham Lincoln.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    2. Re:Popular Science == Popular Hucksterism by swb · · Score: 2

      Heh, I thought that was just Scientific American where the modern and predicted actually matched.

  28. Another use for it by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you're walking down the street, an arrow shows you how to get to your destination. No need to pull out your PDA when you get lost! It could also be a way to do 3d videoconferencing...

  29. I like the diminished reality.... by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Funny

    on the last page where it says this stuff can replace ads and billboards with waterfalls and stuff... Im going to replace everything with naked women....

  30. Or the complete opposite by JohnAsh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the article:

    Although Mann's wearable computer system provides reams of data when he asks for it, it can also block the world out with what Mann calls "diminished reality." This AR software can replace billboards, street signs, and ads on buses with stored digital images of waterfalls and other natural scenes.


    We might get an escalation of the spyware-adblocker war.
  31. Augmented Reality Quake by mirko · · Score: 2

    You should visit Nooface as you'd be interested by this article which is about Augmented reality Quake

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  32. Thoughts... by shut_up_man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think AR stuff is pretty cool. Those sunglasses in Virtual Light, Gargoyles in Snow Crash, it's a pretty darn useful information tool, as long as the information is useful and trustworthy. To that end, I feel that corporations should be kept as far away from this as possible. Otherwise AR will be a mass of ads, spam and lies.

    I think a link to a personal datasource is the way to go, with various connections to trusted information providers. If the map company decides to put ads in its building descriptions, disconnect from their service and join with one who doesn't. You should be able to put on your goggles and see NOTHING AT ALL, and add only the stuff you want.

    Personal datasources might link to other people's sources, in a kind of collaberative system that allows feedback ("you liked that bar? It SUCKED!") and filtering (browsing the world at +5 to avoid the trolls and goatse.cx).

    In order to further clean up the datastream, rocksolid specs for different types of data should be established, probably using XML. No executables either, that way people can't stick Flash animations or viruses in their location descriptions.

    I wonder if use of these kind of info-tools will result in weakened memory, sense of direction, etc... not to mention the social awkwardness of people staring off into space while they process the latest blip.

    Oh, kinda off-topic: I googled and found what looks to be the full text of Virtual Light by William Gibson.

  33. Great for the bar scene.... by Uttles · · Score: 4, Funny

    I turn my head when a knockout enters the room and am presented with:

    Age: 23
    Height: 5'9"
    Weight: 120lbs
    Measurements: 38-24-36
    Status: Single - 3 months
    Favorite Drink: Anything with kick
    Residence: 1 bdr apt - 3 blocks away

    Warning : Syphillis!!!

    Shoot... well, it was a good daydream while it lasted...

    --

    ~ now you know
  34. Sensors for non-visible spectrum by kryzx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's no mention of what I consider to be the most interesting possibility: the ability to "see" the non-visible parts of the spectrum. With something like this you could have sensors to detect infrared, ultraviolet, microwave, etc., and display it as an overlay. Depending on what you were doing you could adjust what parts of the spectrum were shown in your display. That would so totally rock. I can think of tons of uses for it, and technically is seems more feasible than most of the apps described in the article.

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  35. Crap crap crap by osgeek · · Score: 2

    According to an article in Popular Science

    Does anyone really need to read further than that to know that the technology is all pie-in-the-sky bullshit?

    Quoting from Popular Science is like quoting from The Enquirer. Shouldn't /. be a little above that?

    1. Re:Crap crap crap by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Quoting from Popular Science is like quoting from The Enquirer. Shouldn't /. be a little above that?
      what, you new here?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. hmmm.... by bpowell423 · · Score: 2

    combine this, the mechanized exoskeletons that the military is working on, and their spider-silk armor and suddenly all our Marines become Robocops. The REALLY amazing thing is that ALL those pieces are being worked on and have ALL been demonstrated at some level... The marines are talking AR for special forces by 2003 and all troups by 2005. I wonder if they'll have their exoskeletons working by then... A soldier equipped like that could probably take on "normal" soldiers 100-to-1 or 1000-to-1 and win hands down.

    1. Re:hmmm.... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      A soldier equipped like that could probably take on "normal" soldiers 100-to-1 or 1000-to-1 and win hands down.

      I doubt it. Remember that a tank can be taken out by a lone infantryman carrying a LAW-80. In Somalia, American troops with state of the art military technology got their asses handed to them on a plate by untrained tribesman carrying WWII vintage weapons. And the Afghans defeated the might of the Soviet Empire, despite the Soviet's incalculable (on paper) superiority (back when they were on our side, of course).

      Technology does give you domination in the air, but on the ground, things are a little more subtle, and relying on technology more often than not ends in disaster. Could a single soldier with the best technology currently available take on 100 WWII era soldiers? Not a chance. 1000 spear-carrying Zulus? No way - he would run out of ammo long before he'd killed a small fraction of them.

      The US Marines are an effective fighting force because they've never forgotten that you're an infantryman first, and APCs, Apaches and F18s are just the icing on the cake.

  37. Nuts to Augmented Reality! by schlach · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want Filtered Reality!

    Think about it. Why should only those who are willing to suffer the effects of shrooms for days, or LSD for years, be the ones who get to see bleeding walls or leaking phones?! With a helmet around your head that filters your video and audio input (err, vision and hearing), you could have all the trippy hallucinations you wanted, when you wanted! Is that girl really wearing a purple elephant on her necklace, or would she be offended if you tried to feed it a peanut? Are there really bugs crawling into your skin? Better ask the piano!

    What a time to be alive!

  38. Next is Super/Extra/Limited Sensory Perception by WeeGadget · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Overlaying information from DBs onto our field-of-awareness is fascinating. Also useful would be Enhanced Sensory Perception. Devices exist for this already, but they have not been fused into a single field-of-awareness device. Some categories of Enhanced Sensory Perception are :
    • Super Sensory : Our current senses are extended to sense lower intensities and wider spectrum. e.g. Hear faint conversations, sounds too high or low in frequency. See faint things, see infra-red, utraviolet, etc. Smell faint traces, smell chemicals beyond our current detection.
    • Extra Sensory :Sense information that is alien to our sensory system. e.g. Sense UWB Radio to "see" through walls and into the ground. Sense magnetism.
    • Limited Sensing : Cap the intensity of sensory input, to prevent the "stun", and temporary loss of perception effects of extreme intensity inputs. e.g. Reduce the intensity of loud bangs and bright flashes. Another critical goal of limited sensing is to prevent sensory overload. Sensory overload is easily reached when fusing Enhanced Sensory Perception and Information from DBs into our field-of-awareness. The system must attempt to limit this augmentation to areas that represent danger, are of known interest to us personally, or are in our current focus area. e.g. Do we want to hear every faint sound ? ... or just the voice of a distant person we are looking at? Do we want to see the IR signature of everything? ... or just when it would enhance our perception of danger, interest, or current focus? Selectivly limiting and hilighting sensory input is the make-or-break job of a usable Augmented Reality Device.

    Jono
  39. Ouch! by Dr.+Bitchin' · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can easily imagine someone walking into a lamp-post because their vision is blocked by a "blue screen of death"... talk about adding insult to injury

  40. Boeing... by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IIRC, Boeing used (or tried out) an AR system several years back for the purpose of wiring the electrical systems of their planes. The wiring harnesses in the planes consist of several miles of wiring - all over the place.

    From what I understood, the idea was to get the tech to the point where a worker could simply look at the connection points, and the AR system would show what wires went where, via an overlay. I suppose some kind of tracking system would have been needed, to position the overlay properly (and from what I have been following lately, that problem is still unsolved in general AR/VR applications - but getting there rapidly). The whole idea was to eliminate the need for a worker to stop what he is doing, exit the frame, pick up the book of diagrams, leaf through them, and figure out what goes where "abstractly". With such an AR system, production and install times would be lowered - I am sure it could be applied to a number of other areas as well (including repair after the plane is built).

    Not sure where they went with it - if it was a limited trial, how well it worked, whether the equipment was up to task (I tend to think it wasn't), how workers liked it, etc. By the lack of talk on it, I tend to think it wasn't too successful - but the idea gives an example of what really can be done with AR.

    What is funny about all of this is that the first "real" VR style system (ie, the "Sword of Damaecles" (sp) by Ivan Sutherland in the late 1960's) was an AR system, complete with see-through optics and "wire-frame" virtual objects...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  41. Don't need the vision component part by wdavies · · Score: 2

    ... I just want to be able to type stuff into 2 databses just by thinking the words -- IMDB and Google.

    -- oh and page up & down. Is that too hard ? Can I have it embedded please?

    Let me know when its in beta :-)

    Winton