Slashdot Mirror


The Incredible Invisible Case

Brett Profitt writes "No, it's not entirely like the clear pc case, and it's much, much cooler than a simple windowed case, but it would still look great with a hard drive window. This, my friends, is The Invisible Case ! " Truly a labor of love. This may be the nicest case I've ever seen. To bad you can't buy them like this! Check out the details (Transparent rubber feet, fans, and hard drive window). It absorbs envy beams from miles around.

19 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. It absorbs envy beams.... by Cruciform · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and promptly converts them to EMF emissions. :)

    Wrap that rascal! Where's the shielding?

    1. Re:It absorbs envy beams.... by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are no EMF emissions.
      It's built with Transparent Aluminum...
      Faraday to the rescue!

  2. Ummm by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is this not like the "clear PC" case?

    If you want a really invisible case, just lay your mobo and parts out on a table. Then, your PC will be +5 cool.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  3. Kind of like... by B00yah · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Emperor's New Clothes...Just tell everyone that you have a new machine that you modded with a clear case, clear components, and clear peripherals, and only smart people can see them :)

  4. what would be really cool by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what would be awesome with this, is pouring some liquid CO2 smoke into the case and seeing exactly how the airflow inside the case is behaving! you could work out how to best position fans etc.

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:what would be really cool by fiori · · Score: 4, Informative

      That "smoke" you see with dry ice or liquid nitrogen is the water vapor in the air condensing. That would not be a good thing to have on your motherboard.

      There is such a thing as liquid carbon dioxide, but only at pressures above 5 atmospheres.

  5. it looks cool, but... by lyapunov · · Score: 4, Offtopic

    I do not think I would like the constant reminder of all the dust bunnies. I think blowing the machine out every couple of months is good.

    --

    Either give it away or get top dollar, but never sell yourself cheap.
  6. Re:images slashdotted already... by scorcherer · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a mirror at http://127.0.0.1/../../../../../dev/null. Unfortunately the silver plating has worn off so the mirror is invisible..

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  7. How serious is RF interference, anyway? by steveha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I like putting computers together. I always try to keep the RF shielding intact. This computer has no RF shielding at all.

    How much of a problem is that, anyway? If his next-door-neighbor is an amateur radio enthusiast, will the clear computer mess up the airwaves? If he wants to watch TV, will the computer ruin the picture? Can he stop pacemakers at 50 yards or something?

    I don't have any clear idea how serious the emissions from computer hardware really are.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:How serious is RF interference, anyway? by jjhall · · Score: 5, Informative

      As an amateur radio operator, I can add my $.02 worth.

      In working with Packet Radio (data communications over amateur radio) I found that the emissions from my PC were way too high to use the "rubber duck" antenna on my radio, if it were in the same room. I found 2 fixes. One was to put an external antenna on my roof and use it. The other was to put a RF Choke (little black bulge on certain cables) on EVERY cable comming out of the back of the PC.

      The EMI won't affect much outside a 10-20 foot radius, but AM radios, etc... that he tries to listen to in the same room or adjacent room will be hosed.

      As far as pacemakers, etc... go, I don't have any idea.

  8. great except for one problem by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It will look great for about 5 minutes. and DONT take it to a lan-party.
    The type of plastic he chose is easy to polish and looks great, but scratches easier than any other plastic on the planet. Plexiglass is the worst in durability to scratches. yes you could buff out the scratches as you get them.

    I like his idea, and I would love to see someone make one out of real glass with a metallic tint so that the RFI and EMI can't freely propagate out of the case. (You could get your case vaccuum-metalized... now that would be really cool.. not clear... CHROME!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. That invisible case is frigging amazing! by Nathdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean like whoah! the PC is ENTIRELY invisible!

    Either that or the images aren't loading because of slashdotting.

    :)

  10. Re:kama ho + /.-ing by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow!!! That case is soooo invisable my web browser cant even find the pages. it is on. and the ErrorDocument is invisable as well.

    Not Found
    The requested URL /article/72/ was not found on this server.

    Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  11. ...and attracts legislation. by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's the shielding?

    Scary scenario:

    1. Moron makes unshielded case because he thinks it looks cool.

    2. Senator next door suddenly starts getting RF interference on his television.

    3. FCC tracks it down to unshielded PC.

    4. Senator introduces "Computer RF Protection Act" which bars the sale of computer components to the public.

    5. Gateway, Dell, Compaq, HP, and Apple, seeing a way to kill off the screwdriver shops and hobbyist market, form "People Against Radio and Television Interference" (PARTI).

    6. Microsoft, in its desire to sell a new Windows license each time someone wants a new PC, joins PARTI.

    7. PARTI takes out millions of dollars worth of ads pretending to be a concerned citizens group who wants to "stop hackers from interfering with your television."

    8. PARTI passes and the only ones who can get computer components are licensed manufacturers using them in FCC-approved computers.

    Want to upgrade your RAM, hard drive, or CPU? Too bad. You will just have to buy a whole new computer, complete with Windows-du-jour, from one of the big manufacturers.

    Think about that scenario next time you see a case built to show off about $500 worth of consumer-grade computer components.

    1. Re:...and attracts legislation. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But how many Senators are living in apartment complexes watching TV on sets with rabbit ears?

      A better question is "how many Senators are living in ritzy condos using cordless phones?" How many are using cell phones? How many have 2.4ghz video distribution? How many might be have 802.11b? How many listen to FM radio? RF interference does not restrict itself to televisions.

      How many would be able to figure out what's causing interference on their TV when there must be dozens of possible causes?

      All of them. One call to the FCC from a Senator and there would be more more field strength meters and RF triangulation equipment than you've ever seen. The FCC might just send you or me a pamphlet, but they'll send a team of experts out to a Senator's home.

      A case mod that does away with shielding is rude, inconsiderate, and stupid. And, sooner or later, it may result in legislation that hurts all of us.

      This may come as a shock to you, but there is a reason that the FCC limits RF emissions.

  12. Server death by pumpkin2146 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I host this.

    Firemen have been dispatched to Telehouse London to prevent this web server from burning down most of the UK internet as it's pair of P3's and pathetic little IDE disk UTTERLY FAIL to cope with the pure 30mbit/sec of joy that slashdotting creates.

  13. Can be had retail by Toodles · · Score: 5, Informative

    Too bad you can't buy them like this!

    You can purchase similar all plexi-glass cases from www.clear-viewtech.com

    --
    Toodles D. Clown
  14. My new (?) idea of /. mirroring by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Every time someone posts intelligently regarding Slashdot implementing some sort of mirror system, it always gets modded up.
    Here's what I would suggest to do, this solution would address every /. concern:

    I got email, saying that link to my site (http://site/) is going to be posted on Slashdot in half an hour. For the time of slashdotting I add this to my httpd.conf:

    Redirect /img/ http://slashdot.org/cache.pl?url=http://site/img/

    so when someone wants http://site/img/image10.jpeg, she/he would be 302 redirected to http://slashdot.org/cache.pl?url=http://site/img/i mage10.jpeg and would got this image from Slashdot cache. I could even set it up so only queries with http://slashdot.org/* Referrer header would be redirected, or alternatively, someone could just change the URIs in <a href="..."> links in the HTML if the webmaster don't have access to webserver config. But the point is that this way the cache would be served only for explicit wish of the webmaster and also only for those images which are not the ads, banners, counters, etc. if the webmaster wants so.

    It could be also used for HTML but the large images are probably the main reason of killing banwidth on sites, like in this story, with many high quality pictures of cool hardware (I suppose that there are many high quality pictures of cool hardware but I can't access it). The cache could work for, say, 6 hours and would serve only files in subdirectories of linked URIs to avoid any abuse.

    What do you think?

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  15. About time, but when...? by Myself · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They still haven't gotten to the fun part: Transparent circuit boards (copper-clad glass substrate, brittle but beautiful) and transparent chip packaging.

    Think about it! Most QFP and PGA chips have boring black plastic bodies. How hard would it be to replace them with clear plastic? Ceramic packages could probably be made at least translucent.

    Then you embed light-emitting junctions at important areas of the chip, so you can watch the whole thing brighten, dim, and change color as the computational load changes. NOPs would be faint blue, cache misses would make the prefetch unit flash red. Floating-point would cause the FPU to glow green. Imagine it! You could tell what was eating most of your timeslices just by looking at the chip. Nevermind how you'd see through the heatsink to perceive all this. ;) Oh wait, if the board's clear just watch all the action from underneath.

    Seriously though, if the whole mobo chipset were clear-encased too, you could tell the difference between RAM accesses, drive activity, interrupts, DMA storms... Ooooh.

    We already have SCSI terminators with activity indicators, am I really asking for too much?

    (Now why didn't I patent this 5 years ago when I came up with it?)