Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode II Trailer Tonight

Covant was among several to note that Fox is going to air a 2 1/2 minute trailer for Star Wars Episode II tonight, in between Malcolm and The X-Files. I've seen the trailers released so far, and really hope that this one can convince me that Clones isn't going to continue to follow the path to the dark side like Menace did.

106 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. No sign of Jar-Jar by satsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

    In all of the three previews, (including the one that's "for DVD owners only) there's no sign of Jar-Jar. Does this mean we're to be spared the tedium?

    Aside, is this particular trailer the same on as is available to DVD owners?

    1. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by MisterBlister · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not true, Jar Jar's been in the trailers. Not up front, but in background shots where Sam Jackson is up front.

      He's in the movie. He plays the Gungan ambassador who becomes the ambassador for all of Naboo when Amidala cuts out and leaves with Anakin.

      He's not in the movie nearly as much as he was in the first, though. And when he's introduced for the first time in this one...the audience is going to have a laugh, even (especially?) if they are Jar Jar haters.

    2. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Ooblek · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      No, they are waiting to introduce Jar-Jar's wife. Her name is not yet known, but I've heard that she's somewhat of a cross between Cruella deVille and Barney the Purple Dinosaur. Expensive taste in clothes, nastier than a wet Sith Lord, and you can guess what she talks like.

    3. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by erasmus_ · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      How did you miss that tall head and those floppy ears? Check out the trailers again, he's next to Queen Amidala in one of the shots, making all of us cringe.

      The trailer tonight will definitely not show him, according to sources.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    4. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meesa say yousa no be likin us poor gungans dats what isa tink. Wesa just bin myndin meesa own buisinesses ansa meeser George Lucas come don hear ansa get big boss to makin us acatorses. Isa not know whysa we so not liked, yousa all tink yousa better tan us gungans, isa gonna sit in the corner and cry nowsa. :'(

    5. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I never liked Star Wars. I don't even remember the movies, except for the ugly outfits (the stormtrooper tenue is passable).

      Now there are lots of people here who like Star Wars. So I don't want to start a Star Wars is good/bad type of thing. The point is, I don't like the series, I ignore it, to each his own, yadda yadda. Then on the other hand you have the people who like it, who watch it, and (figuring from the comments), for the most part are disappointed with it. Especially with Jar Jar Binks. People really hate Jar Jar Binks, and will go to great lengths detailing the precise nature of their discontent with Jar Jar Binks.

      Now the funny thing is that all this hubbub is fast making Jar Jar Binks into the most memorable character in the second Star Wars series. In fifteen years time, we'll all be going "Remember Jar Jar?" - "Yeah, he was horrible.". I mean I could care less about Star Wars and Death Stars, but I do know that Jar Jar Binks is a character to loathe. Jar Jar may have been a creative mistake, a creative disaster even, but you have to respect commercial genius.

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    6. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by dimator · · Score: 2

      No sign of Jar-Jar, maybe, but take a look at this, about 1/3 down. There's actually a character named "Elan Sleazebaggano." Sleazebaggano?? That's so cheesie it's almost insulting.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    7. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So I don't want to start a Star Wars is good/bad type of thing.

      Try being like me, who simply holds that Star Wars is Fantasy rather than Science Fiction. I generally keep it to myself, but my friends like pointing it out to people who are Star Wars fans for two reasons: for some reason, it tends to really piss off hardcore fans (why, I have no idea, as there's no "better" genre), and my arguments have been very polished after discussing this in hallways in conventions after "friends" hook some guy into talking to me. :) Truth be told, it's an amusing way to pass the time, and I do believe it, so it's not trolling...

      --
      Evan "New Con signin question: What's your Karma?"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny
      How did you miss that tall head and those floppy ears? Check out the trailers again, he's next to Queen Amidala in one of the shots


      Who notices Jar Jar Binks when Natalie Portman is on the screen?! Geez, that's sad.

    9. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      Geez.. a little spoiler alert would be nice. I guess I shouldn't even be reading this article.

    10. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Webmonger · · Score: 3, Funny

      I try to keep it simple; anything which depicts sound traveling through space is fantasy.

    11. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by dswensen · · Score: 2

      And "Greedo" isn't? Seriously, though, that kind of stuff has been all over Star Wars ever since the first movie. They give a lot of the background characters goofy names. I doubt Sleazebaggano will actually be mentioned by name in the film.

    12. Re:No sign of Jar-Jar by Sodium+Attack · · Score: 2

      I think that makes 2001: A Space Odyssey the only science fiction movie ever.

      --

      Never take moderation advice from sigs, including this one.

  2. Advertising advertisments to get viewers by Cyclone66 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it strange how advertising an advertisment will increase rating for a show? That's completely backwards, you're all clones!

  3. starwars.com too by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Informative
    Its going to be posted up at starwars.com at the same time its shown on Fox (at 9PM). One has to assume they are going to put it online at 9PM eastern, so westcoasters (and those in the middle) can get an early peek (relative to their time zone) online.

    I'm expecting the net in general won't be working so well for a few minutes there..

  4. More trailers? by mattvd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe this is old news, but Apple lists two trailers (in QuickTime format of course) for Episode II on thier trailer page here:

    http://www.apple.com/trailers/

    1. Re:More trailers? by MisterBlister · · Score: 3, Informative
      The trailer tonight is actually the 4th trailer, overall. Its the final trailer before the movie opens. Its also the longest and gives the most accurate picture of what the main contents of the movie are going to be (read: Lots of Jedi fighting & dying, lots of Jango Fett kicking ass, Yoda kicking some ass, etc).

      Be sure to check it out.

  5. Script Review at AICN by redink1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Moriarity at AICN, the script to Attack of the Clones doesn't suck that bad. But who knows how it will turn out... Oh, and this FOX trailer also starts at exactly 8:59:17.

  6. Don't support it if it is bad by colmore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The basic problem with the new Star Wars movies is that they are litterally incapable of failing. There will be lines of people simply because of the first two words in the title. Episode 3 could be Star Wars: the return of the 17th century parlor comedy, and half of Slashdot would be there.

    If George Lucas has betrayed his original vision and is simply milking fans for cash, don't go along with it. At least wait for the rental. I promise you, your life will not be significantly altered if you refuse to pay $10 to be dissapointed for two hours.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by nagora · · Score: 3, Funny
      Episode 3 could be Star Wars: the return of the 17th century parlor comedy, and half of Slashdot would be there.

      Actually I doubt I could stay away from a film with that title.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by dimator · · Score: 2

      I promise you, your life will not be significantly altered if you refuse to pay $10 to be dissapointed for two hours.

      I disagree. You'll be left out of countless inside jokes and references that your friends, comedians, and of course, /.ers will make.

      If you didn't watch Phantom Menace until it was rentable, you would have no idea who this Jar-Jar was, and how he could have sucked so bad to lead some people to suicide.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      I disagree. Not when you can download STAR_WARS_AOTC_SCREENER.avi literally 3 hours after it has been released. I saw Menace before most of my friends did in the theatre.

    4. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by bartok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that, like a lot of people here, you got it backwards. Lucas doesn't betray his vision but *YOURS*. Everyone has their own hopes and ideas about what Star Wars should be but it has nothing to do with Lucas's own vision. I adding comic releif characters like Jar-Jar is part of what he thinks Star Wars should be, then the fanatics be damned because that's what it will be about.

    5. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 3, Funny
      Episode 3 could be Star Wars: the return of the 17th century parlor comedy, and half of Slashdot would be there.


      If it were "Star Wars: the Scalability of Linux in the Death Star's Mainframes", then the other half of /. would be there. :-)
    6. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by sparcv9 · · Score: 2
      If you didn't watch Phantom Menace until it was rentable, you would have no idea who this Jar-Jar was, and how he could have sucked so bad to lead some people to suicide.
      I still haven't seen Episode I, yet I know who Jar-Jar Binks, Queen Amidala, Darth Maul, etc are, and know the basic synopsis of the story line. Given the fact that I only watch about 5 hours of television per month, and never go to the cinemas, that's pretty indicative of the amount of hype that surrounded the movie. Hell, I don't even have cable (don't want it, either), so I probably will never see Episode I (or II, or III) unless I happen to be at a friend's house and it just happens to be on at the time.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    7. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by Webmonger · · Score: 2

      People here believe that EP 1 betrayed Lucas' *original* vision for SW, not his current one.

      Comic relief was definitely part of the original vision, but many people here believe that EP 4, 5 and 6 were not just kiddie movies, but appealed to adults as well.

      Even if the old Star Wars was just for kids, none of the fans who saw the original release is still a kid. Disney's quite successful at making fantasy movies that appeal to kids and adults alike. Lucas should aspire to that.

    8. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by xonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I promise you, your life will not be significantly altered if you refuse to pay $10 to be dissapointed for two hours.

      Nor will my life be significantly altered if I do pay $7.50 (going rate in Denver) to see the next movie. I wasn't disappointed with Phantom Menace, and I expect that I'll enjoy this one as well. Granted, there were some parts of PM that were lacking, but overall I enjoyed it.

      Even if Clones is disappointing, it won't be the end of the world...but if it's good, I'd rather see it on a decent-sized screen.

    9. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by dfn5 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Special effects do not a movie make. I wanted to walk out of Episode I half way through, even with all of the stunning special effects. I will definitely not be going to the cinema for this one. I probably won't even rent it. I'll wait for it to be broadcasted over the air waves. That way the special effects will be on par with the plot and characters. That is how I will let Lucas know that he ruined Star Wars. Of course that won't make any difference because the rest of you lemmings will camp out 1 week before the debute.

      And just for the record, I thought the muppets looked far more realistic than the lame computer graphics of Episode I.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    10. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

      If you didn't watch Phantom Menace until it was rentable, you would have no idea who this Jar-Jar was

      I'll have to disagree. I STILL have yet to watch it. BUT I have a couple geek-a-zoid friends that saw it several-teen times between them. I've watched the trailers, read reviews, seen screen captures, etc. I'm in no rush to get it. The next time I find myself with 17 bucks to burn, maybe I'll get it.

      I much more prefer watching Office Space, or Fire Walk with Me, or T-2, anyway.

      My point is that I don't need to see it. Maybe if I've nothing better to do, I'll go rent it. I think hitting F5 waiting to try to get a Fyr57 P057 is more entertaining, from what I know of that flick.

      Just my own opinion.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    11. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by colmore · · Score: 2

      No, Star Wars was a *bit* more serious than a pure kiddie flick. The mark of a live action kiddie movie is children starring in lead rolls (hmmm...) Dark Crystal and Labyrinth were (very good) kiddie fantasy movies; Star Wars was definitely juvinile but I think it is a mainstream fantasy, it occupies a higher place in the pop-culture conciousness than Ninja Turtles.

      The new movies aren't bad because they're made for children (heck, I absolutely *loved* Monsters, Inc.) they're bad because they're *bad* children's movies.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    12. Re:Don't support it if it is bad by dswensen · · Score: 2

      Comic relief was definitely part of the original vision, but many people here believe that EP 4, 5 and 6 were not just kiddie movies, but appealed to adults as well.

      I don't think they actually appeal to adults all that much, but to overgrown kids. Don't get me wrong, I don't see that as a bad thing -- but the Star Wars movies are not "adult" films. They're adolescent pablum.

  7. What the hell is Taco's problem? SW2 was the best! by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Oh... it's not The Empire Strikes Back? Damn.

  8. I'm not holding my breath by the+gnat · · Score: 2

    I saw the "forbidden love" trailer at LotR with my entire family (I'd seen it before already). My dad, who loved the original trilogy, moaned at the end. Who'd have thought they could find a worse Annakin than Jake Lloyd? As for Natalie, I'm still wondering what happened to her after The Professional.

    I'll probably go to Episode II on opening day, but I'm going to ingest suitable quantities of mood-altering substances first. The only good thing about the first movie was the sound went out for a few minutes, so we got free vouchers and I got to see The Matrix.

  9. Karma Whore :) by albino+eatpod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, if you want to see some crappy pics of the trailer already, look here. If you look at one of the bottom pics, you can see the early Star Destroyer taking off.

  10. i dont care what anyone says.... by drik00 · · Score: 2
    I dont care what anyone says, the first toys/movies i remember having/seeing were star wars, and, by god, if i'm no there at the midnight showing, i will be there for the 12:01 showing.

    BTW: if you didnt read the Phantom Menace book for the movie, you really sort of missed out on a lot...

    Any good story has four parts, intro, building, climax, and denoument(sp?)...if you expect Ep. I to have a full story, you totally missed the boat. Ep I was the intro/setup to a lot of background in the dual-trilogy...

    Now, i'm by no means saying i wouldnt but a bullet between jar-jar's eyes, i hated that as much as anyone, but, other than jar-jar, the story set up a lot that will come to be explained in the Ep's II and III...

    1. Once again, in the book, you get a glimpse of Anakin's rift forming with Obi-Wan,

    2. Background on everyone and their dog

    3. Yoda's dual warnings...its interesting

    4. Does the prophecy of the "one that will bring balance to the force" mean that Darth Vader will finally kill the Emperor and himself, thus ending the line of Sith? Or does it mean Darth Vader will work to decimate the Jedi ranks, making Darth and Palpatine the two Sith, and Obi-wan and Yoda the two Jedi?

    5. Basically, if you didnt like Ep I, then just dont go see Ep II, and filter all Star Wars content, and quit bitching. (notice the period, signifying finality)

    I know i'm gonna get a bunch of pussy AC's reply to this, but if anyone has intelligent input, feel free.

    --
    Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    1. Re:i dont care what anyone says.... by VenTatsu · · Score: 2

      I agree with you, there are so many people that unconsciously compare Episode I with the classic trilogy, it could never live up to expectations. Even the comparison to only "A New Hope" will fall short, it builds and foreshadows for the next two movies. After seeing episodes two and three I expect a lot of people that dislike Episode I will find that much of the movie that they disliked was very important to the further story.

    2. Re:i dont care what anyone says.... by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The prophecy of Anakin being the "one that will bring balance to the force" is a little deeper than just killing off the Jedi so that they equal the numbers of the Sith.

      According to Yoda in the Phantom Menace, there are only 2 Sith, ever. So obviously numerical superiority has nothing to do with balancing the force.

      Rather, look at the Jedi and how they behave. Living in towers, above the concerns of non-Jedi. Not accepting gifted students unless they were born into the order, or brought in at infancy (the better to instill their 'wisdoms' upon them before they can form opinions to the contrary).

      The Jedi of this period are at the epitome of Jedi training and knowledge. The only way to restore any balance is to wipe them all out. Others will come who have the Force, but they will have to restart the knowledge pool at the beginning again and it will be a significant time before they have the numbers, resources and training to again need 'balancing'.

    3. Re:i dont care what anyone says.... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I will argue this point with you (here on Slashdot, why not? I don't get around to reading SW boards): According to Yoda in the Phantom Menace, there are only 2 Sith, ever

      Now, I might be corrected--for instance, I've only watched TPM twice, haven't read any of the books, and, as I said above haven't hit any of the sites, etc. So if there is direct evidence to the contrary, I'm sure that you'll let me know.

      But Yoda doesn't actually say that--he says "Always two there are--a master, and a student." I think that he is referring to the martial and spiritual training that all of Sith or Jedi caliber go through. Consider the duality of Luke and Obi-Wan; later, Luke and Yoda. In TPM we have the duality of Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon, and in fact the stipulation that Qui could not receive another student since he already had one.

      Bottom line--I think Yoda was speaking in generalities of the warrior profession, and to draw specific conclusions about the Sith from this statement is a mistake.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:i dont care what anyone says.... by gartogg · · Score: 2

      (And Microsoft's lawyers are just looking for an excuse to shut down /.)
      There are some specific copyright violations here that I would like to address... We're suing. DMCA. FBI. WYSIWYG. FSCK. VRML.

      Funny pseudo lawyer/techiespeak over and out.

      --
      I'm a concientious .sig objector.
  11. Re:The more they show, the less it matters by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Funny
    They basically are telling the whole story in these new trailers. In general, I really don't like the way trailers nowadays just reveal every good bit of the movie.

    Yeah these trailers have shown so much of the second movie that I can already guess that at the end of Episode 3, Anakin will turn to the darkside...Obi Wan will become a hermit living on a desert planet watching over Anakin's son from afar, Palpatine will become the evil Emperor... They shouldn't give away so much of the plot!!

  12. Shot by Shot by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

    If you simply can't wait for the trailer tonight, you can read the shot by shot description on Dark Horizons. I haven't read anything about this movie so as to not spoil it, but I figure it's ok to read the description of the trailer we are all going to see tonight anyway.

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  13. It's going to be good! by Anenga · · Score: 2, Informative

    Other than the various rumors at TheForce.net, I found this on AintItCoolNews a few days ago. And it seems that this movie is alot better than Episode I. With Yoda Fight scenes, Amazing scenery of an underground "gotham-like" Coruscant's underworld.

    I'm really excited about this, and can't wait to see it. Finally something else to be excited to see on Fox other than the Simpsons (except latley).

  14. Have you read Moriarty's TPM script review? by KilljoyAZ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd take anything AICN's Moriarty says about a Star Wars script with a grain of salt, considering how much praise he lavished over the Episode I script. Here's an excerpt:
    Let go of your ideas of what the film is going to be, everyone. You can't be like Jeffrey Wells and walk into this ready to hate it. You can't possibly know how textured and wonderful the story Lucas has to tell is going to be. The thing that makes THE PHANTOM MENACE possibly my favorite STAR WARS story so far (on paper, mind you) is the details. The time off has done something unexpected to Lucas as a storyteller -- it made him better. Considering how he's always doubted himself as a writer, I think it showed remarkable confidence in not putting this script through another writer, someone who might have diluted our return to this place a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. Even the wonderful Frank Darabont would have diluted it, simply because what we got wouldn't be pure Lucas anymore. It's remarkable to read the actual words Lucas put on paper. There's just enough on the page to get the actors moving, but he doesn't really describe the world. What's there is just raw STAR WARS, straight from the tap -- the characters and how they relate. That's enough, though, because these are real characters that are instantly iconic, but also truly human.

    Let me put the final nail in the coffin. Here's what he had to say about Jar Jar:
    I am delighted to report that Jar Jar not only works, but that the Gungans are, as a whole, a welcome addition to the mythology of the STAR WARS universe. Jar Jar is an exile from the other Gungans because he's clumsy. Not just a little, either, but monumentally so. Once Jar Jar meets the Jedi, though, that trait begins to pay off, with Jar Jar mistakenly bumbling his way out of danger and up the chain of command until he ends up a general in the film's final battle. This works well in the script. Jar Jar is funny, but the humor in 1977's A NEW HOPE is one of that film's strong points. This script balances the humor with honest, direct writing that gives Jar Jar (dare I say?) a soul. He may be a sidekick, but here's betting that Jar Jar Binks becomes one of the biggest EPISODE I stars once audiences get their real introduction.

    You can read the rest here. I'll believe Lucas has actually made a good movie when I see it finished and on the big screen.
    --
    This .sig is currently on hiatus for retooling.
  15. Yeah... old news by tweakt · · Score: 2

    "Breathing" and "Forbidden Love" are the two trailers I've seen officially posted so far. There's one I got thats labeled "Episode II Teaser trailer" which does seem to have some new footage that the others don't have. And just last night, shown in front of "The Time Machine" was an EP2. trailer which looked to be "Forbidden Love" trailer and the "Teaser Trailer" combined into one.

    1. Re:Yeah... old news by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Every time I hear the phrase 'forbidden love' as the title of the trailer, I have this sudden mental image of Anakin at lightsabre practice. He's dueling with the remote (a-la Luke in A New Hope) and not doing so well. Obi-Wan comes in, and says 'Here, let me show you.' Then he steps behind Anakin, reaches around to adjust his grip, incidentally hugging him from behind in the process. Their eyes meet, cue the Star Wars love music, then it fades out to the words 'Forbidden Love.'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  16. I hate to say it... by NickV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But am I the only /.'er that will miss this "commercial" on TV, so I can watch the 9|11 CBS special with the camcorder footage inside the world trade center on the 11th? It's commercial-free for two hours, and I think it's going to be a much more meaningful way of spending time with TV tonight(I mean, aren't we the ones that always trashes TV for the "lame" sitcoms and "stupid" filler, that's always on?)

    1. Re:I hate to say it... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Probably.

      I'm not sure what is to be gained by watching this. To me, it seems like slowing down to watch an auto accident. Is there any more to it than that?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:I hate to say it... by NickV · · Score: 2

      Unlike images of the plane going into the towers, which we've all seen millions of times, this camcordered footage captures more subtle images. Every screening review I've read calls it poignant, and says something will be gained from viewing. Infact newsweek, which is even affialiated with a rival network, claims it is "time well spent"

      To take your point further, there has been tons of literature, movies and information published about the holocaust and World War 2, but does that invalidate Schindler's List as something to watch, since "it is like slowing down to watch an auto accident?"

    3. Re:I hate to say it... by xonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd rather watch anything but more footage of the 9/11 WTC attack.

      Why? Because it's unbelievably depressing, and watching yet more footage of the carnage isn't going to help anyone. I'm not saying that people should forget or anything like that, but I'll leave that kind of voyeuristic masturbation to others.

      Watching WTC footage isn't "meaningful." It doesn't help anyone. If you really want to do something "meaningful" go donate blood or some of your time to help charities. Go visit a senior's center and spend time with old people who have no family to visit. Write a letter to one of our troops in Afghanistan.

      CBS may be doing this with the best of intentions, but the bottom line is they're still capitalizing on a horrible event. If the networks really wanted to do something meaningful they'd take an evening and go dark for three hours so people could spend time with their family or do something in their community instead of numbing themselves with television.

      Imagine that for a second -- if every network agreed to go dark for three or four hours simultaneously for an evening on the anniversary of September 11th. (They would have to promote the hell out of it beforehand for safety's sake -- otherwise half the population would go batshit because they'd think someone had attacked and knocked out all the television stations...)

    4. Re:I hate to say it... by NickV · · Score: 2

      I'm glad that the cynicism of /. did not pan out for those show. Naturally /.ers will jump up and down and go ga-ga over a fucking star wars trailer (naturally 2 stories in 3 hours regarding 2 minutes of star wars is what /. is all about)

      So to recap. No, the commercials mentioned earlier were not commercials... they were tributes to public service professionals.

      No, there was not one mention of Osama or the Taliban or the US's war against terror. NONE. ZIP. ZILCH. It never made statements such as "Who cares about all the other world's history?"

      And, yes... after watching it... I will now pass judgment on it. I found it to be incredibly important, and yes... I believe it added an entirely new element to what happened on 9|11. Naturally all the /.ers on here decided to completely condemn the special without even knowing what it was about, what it would show, and even how the sponsors would handle it.

      <sarcasm>But wait... why bother? We got to see 30 seconds of Natalie Portman. Right? I am... all this was was the planes going in again and out of the towers for 2 hours </sarcasm> Gotta love /. cynicism.

    5. Re:I hate to say it... by Veritan+Drelor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather watch anything but more footage of the 9/11 WTC attack too. My reasons, however, are a touch different.

      Personally, I'm sick of the moaning, wailing, and gnashing of teeth over the attack. It was a bad event, but the media are doing nothing more than exploiting several thousand personal tragedies.

      Anyway, how are the deaths of those thousands any more tragic than the deaths of the thousands killed on American highways, or the thousands killed by an inane firearms policy? Scale?

      If you want scale, let's look at Hiroshima. Nagaski. Civilians killed by American bombs. Let's look at Hamburg. Dresden. Essen. Duisberg. Tens of thousands of civilians slaughtered in massive firestorms, at the hands of Britons and Americans - and in case you're wondering, I'm among the former group.

      All of these were "legitimate" acts of war right? America was attacked on American soil. Bad shit happens. Worse shit has happened to alot of other nations in the past, and they've done very well in the long run.

      To America: quit blubbing about a tragedy which is pretty small in the scheme of things. By all means, do whatever is necessary (and legal) to bring those responsible to justice. Quit making out how hard done by you are. Get the job done with Osama and al-Qaeda, and put it behind you.

      PS I daresay I'll be treated as a troll for this post. Whatever. It was an American who stated "I don't agree with what you say, but I'll defence to the death you're right to say it."

    6. Re:I hate to say it... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. I have NO interest in seeing the footage they showed. If someone shows it and I see it come on again, I will CHANGE THE CHANNEL! I am already pissed off/depressed enough about the whole thing (I always wanted to see the WTC, but never got to). Watching it would make me feel like crap all over again.

      --

      Gorkman

  17. overheard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Totally.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' fascists, tryin' to bring us down.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Yeah... they want to take away our fuckin' civil rights. Jack Valenti is such a fuckin' bastard.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Word.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: So, how about that new Star Wars trailer?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Fuckin' cool, man. I'm gonna be there for the 12:01 showing as soon as it comes out!
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Totally. I'd gladly pay again and again to see this fuckin' cool movie! ..... Hey... what were we talking about?
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Dunno. Wanna go see a movie about Hobbits?
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Sure.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Cool.
    SLASHDOT USER 1: Fuckin' MPAA, man.
    SLASHDOT USER 2: Totally.

    1. Re:overheard! by singularity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you ever think about the fact that Slashdot users care about digital rights because some of us are actually movie fans?

      I mean, someone who never goes to the movies and never rents movies is not going to be the one who shows up for protests concerning copyright protection on movies.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  18. You don't have to miss it by T1girl · · Score: 2

    since the CBS 9/11 special will last two hours, I think you can safely watch the short Episode II trailer while DeNiro is working his way through his "brief remarks" and they're setting the statge for the documentary. Or you wait and see the trailer starting March 15 at the Ice Age> movie.

  19. When will you whiners understand? by Psiren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Menace was never targetted at adults. It was targetted at kids. Lucas assumed all the people who saw Star Wars as kids had grown up. Evidently he was only half right, cos you're all still moaning like kids.

    Do you complain about the lack of adult material in other films you take your kids to see? No? So why this one?

    1. Re:When will you whiners understand? by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Do you complain about the lack of adult material in other films you take your kids to see? No? So why this one?

      Other than those drooling over Portman, there hasn't been much call for "adult" content in Star Wars. On the other hand, a lot of us fans were disappointed, because -- unlike the original three -- Phantom Menace lacked any connection to human stories. Star Wars became so popular not due to its special effects (though that helped "hook" people) but due to its adoption of Campbellian mythical archetypes, at a time the nation -- and the world -- yearned for that. The struggle of Good versus Evil appears to be very obvious, but there is just enough depth in "A New Hope" to give it legs. And in "Empire" and "Return", the symbolism is ratcheted up a notch.


      But in "Menace", Lucas failed to tap that vein of mythic commonality. Instead, "Menace" had to shout at you: "Ooo! Look! I'm epic, I'm sweeping. See? Foreshadowing here! Look! Look!" Good writers don't tell you how exciting the roller coaster ride was. Good writers make you feel like you've been on the ride. With "Menace" Lucas proved he's lost any feel for the elemental that he might once have had.


      Star Wars: A New Hope wasn't targeted at kids or adults. It was meant for anyone who appreciated adventure, who wrestled with their identity, who enjoyed a good story. "Menace" was targeted, and that's what ruined it.

  20. Re:The more they show, the less it matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The best was seeing that trailer with my father sitting in the theater. He carries around this oxygen canister, and he actually sounds like Vader.

    Other than that, getting dragged to see 'montsers Inc.' was a total drag.

  21. Description by verbatim · · Score: 2

    Check out this if you want to know what the trailer will be like.

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
  22. Re:The more they show, the less it matters by Dimensio · · Score: 2

    Nice guesses, and I agree, but I have one more. I'm betting that Anakin will have a son who is instrumental in overthrowing the Evil Empire.

    A friend of mine says that Anakin will redeem himself at the end to save his son, but I don't see that coming.

  23. So this is how /. is doing in-line advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sheesh Taco!

    I didn't realize that you were going to hide the ads as articles. Where IS that button to hide the advertisements? Will that get rid of this article too?

  24. Hey a poster more pathetic than Jar Jar !!! by Augusto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... you hated the Phantom Menace, don't like Hayden, don't like Portman, don't like the earlier trailers, and don't seem inclined to like this episode either.

    Yet, you're going to watch the movie, and to top it off on OPENING DAY ! Is that pathetic or what ? If you don't like the movies and the actors, just don't freaking go see it. Less people on the line and less whiners in the theater the better for the rest of us.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  25. Mod Parent up! by epsalon · · Score: 2

    Hey moderators! This AC is funny!

  26. Jar Jar Has Been Removed from Episode One by Cheshire+Cat · · Score: 2
    Hrm.. if Lucas could digitally remaster jar jar out of the next DVD release, that would be awesome.


    Actually, it appears that task has been done. Salon has a nice story on it and doing a google search on Phantom Edit should enable you to find it. As an aside, rumor has it that Kevin Smith, of Clerks and Jay & Silent Bob fame, was the one behind this.

    --

    Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I'll never know.
  27. Nope, 8:55 EST by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Warning: It's not at 9:00 pm, it's at 8:55. If you tune in at nine, all you'll see is the intro to the X-Files.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  28. Sorry but... by ainsoph · · Score: 2

    From what I can *grok* from the trailers I saw, it should be called:

    Episode II: The Search for a Story or

    Attack of the Cloned movie.

    also, I am really worried about the "The beeotch made me do it" subtext of the story. Call me hyper sensitive or whatever, I just wonder if it is not a limp stilt to stand on.

  29. How do I know it is bad if I have not watch it... by efuseekay · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...listen to critics? I think I'd rather decide for myself.

    Alternatively, I can read Jon Katz's review :).

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
  30. Not only is he in the trailer... by danro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only is he in the trailer... it may be far worse...
    This and this is (no joking!!!) concept art for the MMORPG Star Wars Galaxies.

    Prey that nothing like that makes the final cut... Not in the film, nor in the game... ever!

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  31. Dislike dmca and sssca? Stop watching US films. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am doing my bit as a (non-)consumer by not renting, buying, or movie-going. Nor am I obtaining illegal copies, because that'd just make me the industry's excuse.

    Yes, ladies and gentlemen, you need to make up your minds. Do you wish to do your bit? Or is suffering the loss of the Hollywood circus a bit too much? Remember, every cent towards your Hollywood DVD rentals, and your movie tickets, is your voluntary cent as a consumer in support of the destruction of your own freedoms.

    If you believe in ethical purchasing, paste this message into all film articles on Slashdot. Remind your peers of the damage they may be doing to themselves and society.

  32. Movie comparison by Nathdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen the trailers released so far, and really hope that this one can convince me that Clones isn't going to continue to follow the path to the dark side like Menace did.

    I too have seen the trailers so far, and from the looks of things it appears that it's gonna be Titanic in outer space. *bler*

    God save us all from Anakin/Amidala leaning off the edge of the death star. "I'm king of the world! YIPEEE!!!"

    For godsake the only thing missing from the trailer is the swelling Celine Dion/Jon Williams collaboration piece. Is there actually going to be any attacking in Attack of the clones or what?

  33. Opening scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the middle of the Tatooine desert:

    Obi Wan: I feel a disturbance in the force.
    R2D2: you look like you need a Pepsi(TM)
    Obi Wan: Ahh. Refreshing!

    Five minute shot of huge Pepsi can rotating in starfield.

    Starship Command Center:

    Darth Vadar: Boy, I'm thirsty.
    Ship Commander: I find Pepsi(TM) to be refreshing.

    Hands Darth Vadar a Pepsi

    Darth Vadar: Ah..Refreshing!

    Five minute shot of huge Pepsi can rotating in starfield.

    In the Underwater city

    Jar Jar: Meesa thirsty!
    ....

    1. Re:Opening scene by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      So...you are saying Britney Spears and Natalie Portman in the same movie?

      Hell...even if the sound system in the theater bit the dust, I'd still be there for that one :)

    2. Re:Opening scene by dswensen · · Score: 2

      Well, that'd be funnier if Star Wars wasn't one of the only movie franchises left in the world that doesn't have any product placement at all in any of the the movies, ever. Lord of the Rings is the only other mainstream movie in recent memory that doesn't.

      So, I don't know if that is supposed to be a wry criticism of Lucas, or what, but there isn't much to go on from that angle. Now, if you want to make fun of massive merchandising outside the movie theater, then you've got grist for the mill.

    3. Re:Opening scene by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      If Britney Spears was in it, I, for one, would be praying the sound system would bite the dust.

      Wheee.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    4. Re:Opening scene by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Amidala (shaking breasts), monotone: For those who think young.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  34. Drifting awfully close to Godwin, there by rhizome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Schindler's List" deals with subject matter that benefits from more detail and illustration of the subtleties involved in negotiating survival in a tyrranical political environment (the same role that the "tons of literature..." occupies). There's no such insight to be gained from footage of people caught in the wrong place at the wrong time. What could be less subtle than jets flying into buildings?! Is Newsweek really a good judge of poignancy, especially since they stand to gain indirectly from continued public interest in these grotesque displays of misery that do everything but address the underlying issues contributing to the WTC disaster? Much more than a car wreck, these underlying issues are exactly what movies like "Schindler's List" are about.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  35. Yoda Fight Scenes? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    What does he do? Hold the lightsaber over his head so the bad guy can hit at it?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Yoda Fight Scenes? by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, someone throws a stuffed Yoda at the bad guy's head and he holds it to his face, thrashing back and forth, screaming "AHHHHHHHH! GET IT OFFFFF, GET IT OFFFFFFFF!"

      Every time I hear about the Yoda fight scenes, that's the only thing I can imagine happening.

    2. Re:Yoda Fight Scenes? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Maybe a running headbutt to the crotch like Hank Hill's dad in King of the Hill tonight? hheh

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  36. Not seeing it opening weekend... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Why? Because I'm punishing Mr. Lucas for Episode 1. I watched it on DVD recently and stopped it not just out of sheer boredom, but Jar Jar was getting way too much screen time.

    I will see Episode 2. I basically have to as it will no doubt influence my industry. But Lucas isn't getting opening weekend ticket sales out of me.

    I remember Jay Leno saying "Star Wars opening to a record setting 200 million dollars this weekend. They'd have made 400 million if they had brought dates!" heh. That opening figure meant so much. Well as punishment for E1, he's not getting it for E2. If E2 is good, then I'll see opening weekend of E3, but why do I think that's not gonna happen?

    The shortest route to their brains is through their wallet. Sounds disgusting if you think about it...

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Not seeing it opening weekend... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Well as punishment for E1, he's not getting it for E2. If E2 is good, then I'll see opening weekend of E3, but why do I think that's not gonna happen?

      Um, because Lucas isn't going to notice your miserable $8 fit of pique?
    2. Re:Not seeing it opening weekend... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      He'll notice if other people do too. *hint hint*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Not seeing it opening weekend... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I wish I could understand why any form of entertainment seems to need to be the pinnacle of style just to be appriciated these days....."

      Pinnacle of style? Movies tease you by getting themselves all hyped up, and then they turn out to be crap. I, for one, don't want to see the industry realizing they can cut a few corners if they just add to the hype machine.

      If the movie industry self destructs, I'm out of a career. The world is a lot larger than you're overimplified view of it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Not seeing it opening weekend... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "My point is/was, a movie does NOT have to be perfect to be enjoyed. Just watch it, gleam what value from it you can..."

      Hey, I agree with you here. But E1 had little to no value other than visual effects, and I think Lucas could have spent more time making the story interesting than trying to load it with effects. So I am making a statement to Lucas without avoiding seeing the movie. It would be ignorant of me to avoid the movie all together out of 'revenge', but to say 'I regret seeing the last one on opening weekend' is perfectly justifiable.

      "What relevance does this have? I frankly could care less what you do for a living, thanks. "

      So? Doesn't mean you're solution is everybody's solution.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  37. Give me a break by x+mani+x · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    God I'm so tired of these posts. They're happening so much now I'd call them karma whores.

    We're not all hypocrites. I could give a fuck about digital rights. i like dvd's, video games, porn, comics, unix, scifi and fantasy. So do many other people on this site, so don't try to pigeonhole us as also being hippies and donating all our disposable income to the EFF, 'cause you couldn't be farther from the truth.

    Its "News for nerds", not "News for Flag Waving Hippie Commie Hypocrites", so get off your high horse!

  38. DivX 5 and MPEG mirror to be hosted by Drestin · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://node2.callihq.net/

    PLEASE do not link directly to the files, I'm testing a new connection and box and would like to see how it responds to a huge, global demand.

  39. I guess I'll wait and see... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

    There aint much point in guessing how good or bad the film is going to be.. though I am really hoping that its gonna be good - I need SOME excuse to finally go and see a Star Wars movie on the big screen (too young to see the originals first time around, and rather lamely watched Phantom Menace as a 'look what I taped in the cinema' video CD).

    Certainly seems a little darker than Phantom - and the new Boba Fett style character looks pretty cool.

    And of course, Natalie Portman.. any excuse :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:I guess I'll wait and see... by horza · · Score: 2

      Read a couple of reviews before you go and see it. As for being too young to have seen the originals on the big screen, you obviously didn't have a cool cinema near you. They played all the original three on the big screen in my local before SW PM came out, back to back AFAICR. Thrilling experience. All the more come down when I then watched the 4th :-(

      I'm definately going to be more wary before paying to watch the next. The original Star Wars definately have to be watched on the big screen to be appreciated though.

      Phillip.

  40. Jar-Jar unsuspends all your disbelief by jcsehak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The difference:
    Jar Jar is a failed attempt at Buster Keaton-style slapsitck. Unfortunately, Lucas captured none of the sophistication or clever gags of Keaton. All the cutesy characters in episodes 4-6 were realistically intelligent and reacted believably to their situations. Jar Jar is something you'd expect to see in a saturday morning cartoon created by a dodgy old professor who's real passion is Proust, but was told to make a funny children's show.

    I don't know how you could stand a movie that actually expected you to take it seriously when people were fighting with light sabres and jumping in and out of hyperspace.

    You suspend your disbelief. I have no problem believing in (for 2 hours, at least) the Force,light sabres, and Jedi Knights; until some zany loon CGI character comes in and makes me remember it's just a movie.

    Lucas is a master of drama and action. I give it up for him for trying, but I hope he realises that any comedy (even if it's good) in the Star Wars series really doesn't belong. Unfortunately, it looks like I'll be treating episodes 1-3 the same way I do The Godfather III: pretending they don't exist.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  41. What was wrong with Portman? by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > As for Natalie, I'm still wondering what happened to her after The Professional.

    Yeah, she was quite fuckable in *The Professional*, wasn't she? Especially in the *Leon* extended cut. Mmmm, jailbait. Tastes like chicken... ;-)

    But seriously, I didn't think her acting was that bad in TPM--it's just that the script called for a wooned "regal" performance. I can just imagine Lucas directing her into mediocrity: "No, Natalie, say it with less feeling this time. You're a Queen who doesn't know the common people yet, which is why you pretend to be one of them to learn. But right now you're aloof, so act like you're Queen Victoria trying to hold it in after being given a laxative."

    In contrast most of her other recent performances have been great, like in *Where the Heart Is*. Oh, and in those topless pictures the paparazzi got of her at the beach. Her performance in those was good, too. ;-)

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    1. Re:What was wrong with Portman? by dswensen · · Score: 2

      But seriously, I didn't think her acting was that bad in TPM--it's just that the script called for a wooned "regal" performance. I can just imagine Lucas directing her into mediocrity

      Agreed. There's only so much you can do with the material you're given. Even Harrison Ford used to complain that "no one can say these lines." I think too many Star Wars actors get unfairly criticized when in truth, the dialogue just can't be delivered convincingly.

    2. Re:What was wrong with Portman? by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd like you to *try* to identify me. You can't. You'd discover that I post with the Chasing Amy nic only to /. and to USENET groups. This is the nic I started using when I came to do research in groups like news://alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen , where I read and still read the text posts (and *only* the text, no binaries). As such, I've never given any *real* information about myself which could reveal my true identity, because a lot of people would be upset at anyone even for just reading text in such a group.

      So, it's ironic that you're getting uptight about me mentioning how attractive Natalie Portman was even at a very young age. ;-) The guys in p-t and similar groups would just...well, agree. :-o

      Admitting that underage people can sometimes be attractive, and actually wanting to touch them, are two very different things. By nature we're meant to find Natalie Portman to be quite attractive, even when she was 12--because in primeval times she would have made a wonderful mate, and in primeval times you'd want to snap them up fairly young, so that she'd bond with you by having you as her first sexual partner and so when she becomes fertile you can be pretty sure the baby is really yours. We're by nature meant to find nubile budding young girls like Natalie Portman at the time she did *Leon* to be sexually attractive. Modern social constructs try to overwrite nature and tell us not to be attracted to them--but on some level we still, even if only on rare occasions, are. It's just natural, and looking and touching are two very different things. I'm far healthier than a prude who thinks it's wrong to be attracted to a budding adolescent girl, because I acknowledge nature and choose to ignore it, rather than refuse to acknowledge it and repress it under social programming.

      So, exactly why should I choose to keep a comment about Natalie's inherent cuteness and fuckability off a public board? We'd all be much more sexually healthy if we dropped the Puritan "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" crap. And it isn't even evil--it's just natural programming tha's no longer socially viable.

      If we were in any other age but this one, you too would acknowledge the fuckability of the adolescent Natalie Portman. :-)

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
  42. Riiight... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Right. 'Cause, you know, Slashdot is actually populated by a great big hive mind, a la the "Microsoft" icon on the front page.

    Clearly we (by which we mean Slashdot) see you as a virus, and you must be stmaped out and ignored, since you're not part of the collective. Which explains the Score: 4, Funny. Right.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  43. This will be tough by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    I'm afraid that seeing the Ep1 trailer so many times ruined my enjoyment of the movie before I even got to the theater. Trailers do reveal a lot of plot that some people want to be surprised with - including me. I mean, the Ep1 trailer basically reveals that Qui-Gon dies! What else could Obi-Wan be screeching "Noooooooo!" about? We know Anakin doesn't get turned to the dark side yet, we know Jar Jar doesn't die, so of course he has to be bitching about Qui Gon dying.

    So, I'm going to make an effort not to see the Ep2 trailer AT ALL. I know it'll be hard.. I don't know what I'll do when I go to movies. I don't watch live TV anyway, so I'll tivo through any tv commercials. Well it'll be tough. I'll see if I can just MINIMIZE exposure to the trailer.

  44. Well that sucked by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    See subject. Some good light saber action here and there, but the story just doesn't do for me at 31 what ANH did for me at 7.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  45. *sigh* by lkaos · · Score: 2

    Oh well, can't win them all.

    Lot's of catch-phrases and cartoonish special effects. 'Begun has the clone war'

    Even Yoda is lame.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  46. The trailer is out onn Apple's Web site! by antdude · · Score: 2

    Large Video Resolution! Note: Doesn't seem to work in Netscape Communicator v4.79. :(

    Thanks to Epidemic from #starwars IRC room!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  47. It was alright by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

    There was certainly a lot of stuff going on in it... and the movie looks like it will be interesting enough to get my $5. (matinee showing)

    But _man_, the clips in the trailer just seemed to be thrown together without any real order behind them. The previous trailer was a lot better in terms of editing.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  48. So CG has run its course then? by The+Cat · · Score: 2

    One thing that has become apparent: no one is impressed by anything any more.

    It takes literally a few minutes after the release of ANYTHING for people to be wheezing "ehhh, it sucked and by the way everything sux"

    I'm not defending the Star Wars trailer (because I haven't seen it), this is just a general observation. What does it take for people to like something? I think "stunning visuals" are becoming a commodity, or at least, one would think they were by the collective yawn everything is received with any more.

    Maybe it's just because we know it is fake and further, we know how it was faked. Like a magician who's tricks are all explained ahead of time. I don't know. I'm just wondering if perhaps "the audience is no longer listening."

    Just a thought.

  49. The Critic Got an Advanced Screening... by MBCook · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It seems that The Critic got an advanced screening. So what did he think of the movie? I quote: "It STINKS!!!"

    Seriously though I don't understand what you are all whining about. First of all you have to remember that the episode 4 has been around and worshiped for more than 20 years, and to expect a brand new movie to live up to that is rediculous. Personaly, I'll see the movie even if it's said to be terrible. Call me crazy, but most of the movies that have come out in the last few years are complete trash. You want a plot summary of most movies? Guy/Girl exists. Guy/Girl has sex on the first date with Guy/Girl he/she doesn't know. More stupid pathetic plot with more holes in it than swiss cheese. Happy ending. If this movie is half coherent, it will already be better than many movies lately.

    Also, is it really fair to judge a movie by a trailer? Lately I've been watching alot of older movies on DVD, and they usually include the trailer. I can't help but say that while many of the movies are great, I'm not so sure I would have gone to see them based on the trailer. I think we have all had an expirence like this. Then of course we've all had dozens of expirences that are just the opposite: great trailer, worst movie ever.

    Have we nothing somewhat more important, but still totally pointless, to debate? Let's debate something like forcing all one-legged-weasles-born-on-the-right-side-of-a-wat ermellon to have the left side of their head shaved for posterity. That's about pointless and weird enough for Slashdot.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  50. Re:the shiny ship by The+Cat · · Score: 2

    This is Mr. Obi-Wan Kenobi of the deserts of the planet Tatooine. He cannot be seen...

  51. You need to recheck your facts DUDE! by dswensen · · Score: 2

    God save us all from Anakin/Amidala leaning off the edge of the death star. "I'm king of the world! YIPEEE!!!"

    Uh, dude, the Death Star doesn't have an edge... it's a globe!!!

    *cue burst of high-pitched, nerdy laughter*

  52. Re:DIVX5 mirrors [was Re:Actually at apple.com] by Drestin · · Score: 2

    Don't make assumptions. I'm doing something beyond the little img...

  53. Warning, above post bit of spoiler by horza · · Score: 2

    Who modded the above up informative? Can we please add "SPOILER" in title or mod it down again. I didn't want to know already that "Amidala cuts out and leaves with Anakin", even if you though it was obvious.

    Phillip.

  54. But ... I like it by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    I've been hearing people complaining about Episode I ever since it came out. That seems to be the official policy around here judging by the commentary from the editor.

    But I liked Episode I. Most of my coworkers and classmates did, too. While finishing my senior design project in spring of 2000, two of us on the group wanted to listen to the TPM soundtrack -- over and over and over again. I still listen to it all the time at work. (Got the ultimate edition!)

    I thought Ep. I was spectacularly exciting. In fact, the only thing I didn't really like was the podraces. :) My comment to people who hadn't seen it the next day at work was "The lightsaber battles alone were worth paying $50 to see." I still stand by that statement; I loved it! And I think III is going to be one of the best stories ever told. Maybe it will take everyone (but me) by surprise.

    Actually I think II is going to take a lot of people by surprise. Sure, I'm going to be there opening night. Not because I'll watch anything Lucas puts out, but because I've liked everything Lucas has put out. If I'm the only one who likes it, it just makes it feel like Lucas is putting out a custom movie for me and my friends.

    I find it hard to think that half of Slashdot would show up for Star Wars: the return of the 17th century parlor comedy when nearly all of slashdot seems to agree with you.

    To change the subject, has every heard about Virtual Episodes VII, VIII, and IX?

  55. Fscking Marketing *&*$%#^@ by WyldOne · · Score: 2

    Just how far will they go? I mean really, ad to hype other ads. What's next? pre-'feminie freshness' ads to prepare us for the real ones?

    Next you will see the pre-pre-pre-ad for the pre-pre-pre-trailer of Star Wars 3

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819