Will this "Everquest" help me in getting an Open Beta CD-Key for WoW from the duct-taped together webserver that is FilePlanet.com? Or perhaps assist me in my perilous presuit of refreshing "signup.worldofwarcraft.com" every 5 seconds in hopes of grasping -- ever so quickly -- that final bliss-filled orgamsmic joy of actually getting to play?
LOL. Ah yes, Canada, home of free speech and equal opportunity. Is this the same Canada who's Government got in a huge hissy fit over Conan O'Brien [msn.com]? (And they complain about the FCC) Or is it the same Canada that bans America's #1 Cable Network [canoe.ca] because the Government disagrees with it's coverage, while allowing Al-Jazeera to broadcast freely.
LOL. Ah yes, Canada, home of free speech and equal opportunity. Is this the same Canada who's Government got in a huge hissy fit over Conan O'Brien? (And they complain about the FCC) Or is it the same Canada that bans America's #1 Cable Network because the Government disagrees with it's coverage, while allowing Al-Jazeera to broadcast freely.
Take a look at the article. It has all anonymous sources. Do you really believe that this guy -- Doug Thompson -- has access to the aides to the President and is able to write up this article, and yet the Washington Post, New York Times, LA Times etc. are not? Right.
The guy who wrote this is an ex-Freeper (Free Republic member) who is on a crusade to ruin Bush. He's admited to fabricating stories before. This guy is clever, he writes stories out of thin air and adds stuff you wish were true. I could just see you reading it and going "OMG! THAT RIGHT-WING BIBLE-THUMPING SHRURB!"
So your basically saying that you don't need security. You don't need to arm yourself with a gun or have a nationalized military? I don't think you live in the real world. You live in a dream world where everyone are little cuddly pink care bears who only become violent when other cuddly pink care bears start intimidating them with mean weapons and armies.
I'm not implying by this that Americans are inherintly evil or backward ( as they imply of their enemies ). The US is simply the pinnacle of the world's capitalist empire, and as such, is the most glarying obvious example of what capitalism is really about: profit at any cost.
Capitalism doesn't have anything to do with your ramblings in this post, why even mention it? I guess your ignorance is not limited to your faux worldview, but also to economics and social order.
Capitalism is about the individual, not about the collective. Look how much fuss we had over liberating a country. Think what would happen if we said we should take over France "just because". It would be impossible. Not so in a communistic or socialistic country. They must do what their government says or they die.
Socialism and communism don't work. They never have, and never will. Certain aspects of socialism can work with democracy, for example more communal emphasis on helping ones neighbour or whatever, but in and by themselves they don't work. (And don't bring up how America "ruined" the socialism experiment in Chile, for that is a myth)
Don't think that's what the plan is? Check out http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmeric asDefenses.pdf, which was prepared by such war criminals as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Elliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz.
LOL. Don't you just love it when these people bring up PANC. Jesus Christ! PANC only has like three members, and half of them work at the Weekly Standard. They've had like three meetings, and have no influence or control over the Bush administration. Bill Kristol has debunked the liberals outcry over that organization countless times, yet it still is brought up all over the place as some kind of spooky Right-wing conspiracy.
PANC's main motto is that democracy worldwide is the best way to curb terrorism. I don't see what's so wrong with that.
During the Clinton administration, there were proposals by aides to add a system that would require the highway police to check greencards of people they pull over, but Clinton denied it because Janet Reno said it would eventually lead to "racial profiling" and would hurt the Mexican base for Clinton's re-election, so they never went through with it.
And guess what? The mastermind of 9/11 was pulled over for speeding days before the terrorist attacks. Not to mention Janet Reno's denial for the CIA to check a suspected terrorists (again, a 9/11 terrorist) laptop because of "civil liberties" issues.
All of that has changed though. It's funny when people say "why didn't we do this before?". How could we? Nobody would of allowed it.
The fingerprinting on American airports is an overreaction and a sign of paranoia
What the? And you know Howard Dean would be the first to scold the Government if another terrorist attack happened and we could of prevented it with fingerprinting. Better safe than sorry, as they say.
The fingerprinting hardly takes any time whatsoever, and early reports are even showing that it speeds up the process because the guys who check you out don't have to worry that some of you are unidentified, since your already all verified... er' somethin' like that.
French antisemetic "theories"?!
Oh, boy, where do I start? How about recently, when a French "comedian" Dieudonne M'Bala M'Bala was reprimanded by the producers of "You Can't Please Everyone" on state-owned France 3 television, for appearing on their show dressed as an Orthodox Jew and shouting "Heil Israel" while making the Nazi salute--although the producers were too cowardly to label this as the outright Jew-hatred that it was.
Now this antisemitic bastard is demanding an apology and threatening to sue France 3: Fury at French comic 'Heil Israel' jibe.
I wouldn't really call the CATO Institute a "right-wing" group. They're libertarian. For example, they opposed the War in Iraq.
Re:The problem I have with this article
on
Message in a Battle
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
This may intrest you...
From FotR:
FRODO: I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened...
GANDALF: So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us.
I know out there, there's a guy getting on with his life, perfectly happily, minding his own business, saying to you, the political leaders of this country, "Why me, and why us, and why America?" And the only answer is because destiny put you in this place in history in this moment in time, and the task is yours to do.
Yea, the U.S. did supply weapons to Iraq. Take a look at the numbers. Russia provided 57% of arms to Iraq, France 2nd at 13%, China at 12%. The U.S. was only at 1%. We obviously made mistakes trusting Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War, but we've since learned our lesson and taken care of that.
The SS at your door.
Will this "Everquest" help me in getting an Open Beta CD-Key for WoW from the duct-taped together webserver that is FilePlanet.com? Or perhaps assist me in my perilous presuit of refreshing "signup.worldofwarcraft.com" every 5 seconds in hopes of grasping -- ever so quickly -- that final bliss-filled orgamsmic joy of actually getting to play?
/Already got CD-Key suckers
Crap, Wrong Parent >
LOL. Ah yes, Canada, home of free speech and equal opportunity. Is this the same Canada who's Government got in a huge hissy fit over Conan O'Brien [msn.com]? (And they complain about the FCC) Or is it the same Canada that bans America's #1 Cable Network [canoe.ca] because the Government disagrees with it's coverage, while allowing Al-Jazeera to broadcast freely.
You live in a glass house.
LOL. Ah yes, Canada, home of free speech and equal opportunity. Is this the same Canada who's Government got in a huge hissy fit over Conan O'Brien? (And they complain about the FCC) Or is it the same Canada that bans America's #1 Cable Network because the Government disagrees with it's coverage, while allowing Al-Jazeera to broadcast freely.
You live in a glass house.
As oppose to the liberal version of FreePer (although, I'd say it's 10x worse), which is celebrating the death of former President Ronald Reagan.
Best to just steer clear of the Internet bottom feeders.
Here, how about this? It's an OP/ED he posted a while back admitting that the "major source" he's had for a long time was fake/an imposter.
Dude, this guy is not credible. It's just that you want to believe it. MoveOn.
God, this thing is spreading like wildire.
Take a look at the article. It has all anonymous sources. Do you really believe that this guy -- Doug Thompson -- has access to the aides to the President and is able to write up this article, and yet the Washington Post, New York Times, LA Times etc. are not? Right.
The guy who wrote this is an ex-Freeper (Free Republic member) who is on a crusade to ruin Bush. He's admited to fabricating stories before. This guy is clever, he writes stories out of thin air and adds stuff you wish were true. I could just see you reading it and going "OMG! THAT RIGHT-WING BIBLE-THUMPING SHRURB!"
But it is Java. Barf. Java
is like Communism, Great ideas on paper that just don't work.
What freedom is that? Running around saying your going to fly planes into buildings? Or your freedom to bring an knife on a plane? Please.
You mean like this doozie? (See the video!)
Capitalism doesn't have anything to do with your ramblings in this post, why even mention it? I guess your ignorance is not limited to your faux worldview, but also to economics and social order.
Capitalism is about the individual, not about the collective. Look how much fuss we had over liberating a country. Think what would happen if we said we should take over France "just because". It would be impossible. Not so in a communistic or socialistic country. They must do what their government says or they die.
Socialism and communism don't work. They never have, and never will. Certain aspects of socialism can work with democracy, for example more communal emphasis on helping ones neighbour or whatever, but in and by themselves they don't work. (And don't bring up how America "ruined" the socialism experiment in Chile, for that is a myth)
LOL. Don't you just love it when these people bring up PANC. Jesus Christ! PANC only has like three members, and half of them work at the Weekly Standard. They've had like three meetings, and have no influence or control over the Bush administration. Bill Kristol has debunked the liberals outcry over that organization countless times, yet it still is brought up all over the place as some kind of spooky Right-wing conspiracy.
PANC's main motto is that democracy worldwide is the best way to curb terrorism. I don't see what's so wrong with that.
Learn.
Ah, let me fix this for you.
Well, stop liberating people would be a good start.
There you go.
During the Clinton administration, there were proposals by aides to add a system that would require the highway police to check greencards of people they pull over, but Clinton denied it because Janet Reno said it would eventually lead to "racial profiling" and would hurt the Mexican base for Clinton's re-election, so they never went through with it.
And guess what? The mastermind of 9/11 was pulled over for speeding days before the terrorist attacks. Not to mention Janet Reno's denial for the CIA to check a suspected terrorists (again, a 9/11 terrorist) laptop because of "civil liberties" issues.
All of that has changed though. It's funny when people say "why didn't we do this before?". How could we? Nobody would of allowed it.
The fingerprinting hardly takes any time whatsoever, and early reports are even showing that it speeds up the process because the guys who check you out don't have to worry that some of you are unidentified, since your already all verified... er' somethin' like that.
French antisemetic "theories"?! Oh, boy, where do I start? How about recently, when a French "comedian" Dieudonne M'Bala M'Bala was reprimanded by the producers of "You Can't Please Everyone" on state-owned France 3 television, for appearing on their show dressed as an Orthodox Jew and shouting "Heil Israel" while making the Nazi salute--although the producers were too cowardly to label this as the outright Jew-hatred that it was. Now this antisemitic bastard is demanding an apology and threatening to sue France 3: Fury at French comic 'Heil Israel' jibe.
Noam Chomsky? Good God. He's the most anti-American guy out there. Learn. Learn some more.
I wouldn't really call the CATO Institute a "right-wing" group. They're libertarian. For example, they opposed the War in Iraq.
From FotR:From Tony Blair:
Yea, the U.S. did supply weapons to Iraq. Take a look at the numbers. Russia provided 57% of arms to Iraq, France 2nd at 13%, China at 12%. The U.S. was only at 1%. We obviously made mistakes trusting Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War, but we've since learned our lesson and taken care of that.