Slashdot Mirror
US & Russia Show Off New Rocket Designs
jonerik writes "Following up on today's story on the Soviet Union's massive N1 rocket are these two articles on the latest US and Russian rocket designs. Space.com covers the American side of things, with a story on Lockheed Martin's Atlas 5 and Boeing's Delta 4 boosters. The Associated Press has this article on the Russians' Rokot booster, originally built in the '70s as the SS-19 ICBM and converted to civilian use in the mid-'90s. The Rokot was in the news this past weekend when it successfully launched a pair of US-German satellites - dubbed Tom and Jerry - into orbit to map the Earth's gravitational field and 'chart large-scale movements of water around Earth.'"
Recently there has been some controversy over Slashdot's apparent disregard for browsers other than Konqueror or Netscape (*cough* IE *cough) ability to render the page, and some unfortunate crapfloods which would appear differently in different browsers.
The "editors" (I use the term loosely) of Slashdot appear to believe that Slashcode generates perfect HTML which any browser should render correctly, else the browser must be "buggy".
Slashcode's HTML Output
Just curious, I tried running the front page of Slashdot through the W3 validator to test this claim. The results were shocking.
Lets stick to the facts and drill down into the numbers. The W3 validator found HUNDREDS of errors on the very first page of Slashdot that you view every day. It terminated with the simple line Sorry, this document does not validate as HTML 3.2..
So, what is broken? Is it IE? Or is it the amateur garage-style open source code which is at fault? You be the judge.
Apparently, Slashcode follows the open source coding and testing ethic of "it worked for me". It's just too much to ask them to try to test their code for conformance and compliance, or even just try it on a variety of platforms.
Microsoft's HTML Output
Still curious, I tried running msn.com and microsoft.com through the validator. I was totally taken aback when the validator reported ZERO ERRORS in *either* of these pages.
Conculsion
1. It may benefit the coders to attempt to adapt to some kind of acceptable process for designing, writing, and testing their own code. Perhaps some professional experience would be beneficial here. Certainly an accountability for certain quality standards must be implemented.
2. Perhaps Slashdot should consider switching to IIS 5.0 or .NET server and rewriting their code using a stable, reliable platform like Visual C++ or .NET. Perhaps only then will the browser compatbility issues will be resolved.
These are just suggestions. I am here to help.
Third Post for Katie!!!
Get it in ya, Logged in Bitches!
The CIA infiltrated the Russian Space Program and sabotage the Soviet plan to land on the moon ahead of the Americans by several years. Search for it on Google, you can find many links.
Now something a little off topic. Aren't Russians and the other ex-communist countries against America and the capitalist way of life? Don't they hold spite against these people who were their enemies or do they completely forgive Americans and have no loyalty to communism? Remember, the Cold War ended only 11 years ago.
Penis! They remind me of PENIS! What I wouldn't give for a hot twink right now...
Our private sector isn't taking off as many expected and NASA is...well NASA(this is coming from a former employee). We should covertly help China and Russia with their space and rocketry programs in order to kickstart congressional butts(read $$moolah) into action. Mars is a waste of time(radiation, gullies caused by CO2 not water, etc etc) The Space Station needs fiscal help Europa and Pluto missions are up in the air. something really needs to be done.
The Atlas IV is conspicuously absent from Lockheed's website. It was definitely more cool looking than the II or III, but it's success rate hovered pretty close to 0%.
Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
americans are much too cocky for their own good. perhaps seeing they were beaten by a bunch of poor illiterate peasants in the field of space and rocketry design will size them down so to speak :)
Our good friends in the Eastern hemisphere have had a hell of a century from which they're still recovering. Lately, however, I'm hearing quite a bit of good things about Russia's space program. While it may have started out rocky and dangerous due to the influence of the communist party, this is the same space program that gave humanity both the longest-working manned space station in the form of MIR and the Progress supply frieghter rocket, which supplies the ISS right now. Say what you will about these two, but in terms of space programs, the Americans have always striven to become 'doers of deeds' while the Russians have been 'completers of tasks'. Think about which one of those pays off in the long run.
Recently, more and more of Russia's space program seems geared to provide access to space for both commercial and scientific work. Space Tourism in ISS, anyone? I would be willing to bet that if they become even a little more efficient at this, their costs will quickly drop because they will be the less expensive option when compared to the U.S. space program. Perhaps space could be a growth industry for Russia, the same way information technology has been for the United States.
Anyone agree, disagree with me?
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
In this instance, the russians have the right idea, their Rokot booster follows the market to a tea. As a general rule, private companies have used for smaller and therefore cheaper rockets with up to a 20 ton cargo capacity. It is this private investment that will make space travle feasible. The governemnts of the world cannot simply fund a continuing space progam to the fullest extent and other sources must be sought. Big rockets may be better for space travel to Mars and the like, but the demand now is for smaller ones and that may be how Russia gets its feet off the ground (literally).
Anyone wanna see my rocket "designs?"
When the price of getting up there gets to $2,000(due to some new form of propulsion likely) then we'll see great strides such as Space Station wheels(2001, movie) and spacecraft to Venus, Moon, etc.
Introduction
.NET server and rewriting their code using a stable, reliable platform like Visual C++ or .NET. Perhaps only then will the browser compatbility issues will be resolved.
Recently there has been some controversy over Slashdot's apparent disregard for browsers other than Konqueror or Netscape (*cough* IE *cough) ability to render the page, and some unfortunate crapfloods which would appear differently in different browsers.
The "editors" (I use the term loosely) of Slashdot appear to believe that Slashcode generates perfect HTML which any browser should render correctly, else the browser must be "buggy".
Slashcode's HTML Output
Just curious, I tried running the front page of Slashdot through the W3 validator [w3.org] to test this claim. The results were shocking.
Lets stick to the facts and drill down into the numbers. The W3 validator found HUNDREDS of errors on the very first page of Slashdot that you view every day. It terminated with the simple line Sorry, this document does not validate as HTML 3.2..
So, what is broken? Is it IE? Or is it the amateur garage-style open source code which is at fault? You be the judge. [w3.org]
Apparently, Slashcode follows the open source coding and testing ethic of "it worked for me". It's just too much to ask them to try to test their code for conformance and compliance, or even just try it on a variety of platforms.
Microsoft's HTML Output
Still curious, I tried running msn.com and microsoft.com through the validator. I was totally taken aback when the validator reported ZERO ERRORS in *either* of these pages.
Conclusion
1. It may benefit the coders to attempt to adapt to some kind of acceptable process for designing, writing, and testing their own code. Perhaps some professional experience would be beneficial here. Certainly an accountability for certain quality standards must be implemented.
2. Perhaps Slashdot should consider switching to IIS 5.0 or
These are just suggestions. I am here to help.
Mmmmmmm
Until people stop thinking about rockets as though they were religious icons and start thinking about them like dragsters, we will get nowhere fast in space.
Seastead this.
Former Astronaut Buzz Aldrin is planning a chain of "orbiting hotels" cruising perpetually between the Earth and Mars. [...] The main trick to the operation is to have the main ships in a constant regular solar orbit so that no fuel is ever needed to keep going, just enough for boosters, manuvering, etc. The estimated trip time between the Earth and Mars is 8 Months.
(more links in the original story)
Maybe he might want to pick up some of the surplus items?
[smile]
There has to be a use for a lot of this surplus stuff for business.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Yes, it will be a great advance when we can get wheels on the Space Station. Those oxen dragging it along on skids just isn't very efficient.
Note that the Atlas V is not powered by an American engine, it's powered by a closed-cycle Russian engine - the type Americans could never manage to work out how to build..
It's interesting to see 1960s Russian tech comfortably beating American tech, despite the sizable difference in available resources.
Rockets, at least in my opinion, are dying out or at least should be. Reusable fixed wing craft are what we need if we want to continue to make progress in the future. We should spend the money on space exploration and not wait for another national crisis to get the president to order us to "get to the moon" before another country. Space is a vast frontier that we can learn a lot from.
I can't beleive this!
Not content with moderating my parent comment down, CmdrTaco and friends have gone though the last 5 of my posts (some of which were over 1 month old) and moderated them down as well.
Looks like censorship is alive and well in slashdot land.
The ISS is a good example of how each country has screwed up. First, most of the cost of the ISS was underestimated (intentionally) by the US just so they could get something into orbit. Then, the bankrupt Russian Space program couldn't get their modules into orbit quickly enough, thus increasing the burden on the US to use their (very expensive) mechanism of delivery, the Space Shuttle.
The Russians have the right idea with using expendable rockets & modules like the progress to deliver supplies; let's hope the US is trying to do that as well.
--- There is a man in a smiling bag.
Yeah, an employee of fuckin' McDonald's!
Man, how many good bucks could've been saved if US and Soviet developt their warfare stuff together?
We didn't they think of this before? =)
and go to bed! And how many times have I told you not to stick things mentioned on slashâ IN YOU?
Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
YOU MORONS
I WANT TO BE downCAPPED AT minus 1 !!!
you smell
P.R.O.P.z. 2 A.L.L. Goatse !!!
Smile, don't click...
I always thougt, that the European Ariane-Design shoul be the most advanced.
... (sadly i wasn't able to get the russian-rocket-article ...)
The article about the US-Rocket states this, as it sees the Ariane as its mayor copetitor, and not the russian
The new Delta uses a novel technique called friction stir welding. They weld the tanks and fuselage using this method, and also weld the tanks TO the fuselage this way.
Friction stir welding uses a spinning mandrel's friction to heat the materials to be welded, and can make lighter-weight products because no extra thickness in the weld area is required.
More information on the technique is here.
We are the cosmonauts who say N1!
You got things the wrong way arround.
The MiG-29 is the Russian answer to the F18, while the Su-27 was their answer to the F15 & the Su-33 is the Russian answer to the F14.
& the Su-32/Su-34 is the Russian answer to the F15D Strike Eagle.
Its a generational thing, each side takes turns being on top
NASA went to the moon and all I got was a non-stick frying pan.
Most countries (especially Russia)could make much better use of the money - the rest is Sci-fi dreaming.
Anyone know what's happened to the Rotary Rocket Company? The website is unavailable. Have they folded? I hope not, as it was one of the coolest SSTO vehicles I've seen.
So when the Russians are thrifty and practical there's no end to the praise they get, but if an American company chooses to be thrifty and practical (by using a pre-existing engine, why re-invent the wheel?) then suddenly the whole U.S. is forty years behind Russia when it comes to rocketry? Sure.
[PowerPoint] is a tool for capitalist presentation
The US could afford to start a Mars program (or go to the Moon, or land a whole bunch of probes on Europa) any time it wanted and wouldn't notice the cost. It's just that priorities lie elsewhere right now.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
--Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
It's nice to see old I.C.B.M. designs used as satelite launch vehicles and not the other way around. I say this because a lot of ICBM testing was done with the cover story of being failed sattelite launches. If a craft is launched and falls apart in suborbit, and the people who launched it say it was a failed satelite shot, it's easy to miss when the mock warhead comes down in the middle of the pacific to be picked up by a ship for telemetry download. So perhaps times are really changing now. Or maybe the lies have changed.
I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
Today most of Russians have nothing against US or Western capitalism - they have a lot of struggling between private and public sectors in their own country.
But what a lot of people cannot ignore is a policy of double standards that US perform. US gov't is against terrorrism, but does killing in other countries without any international court warrant. What's that? They condemn crime and do crime at the same time?
That certainly keeps a lot of other countries warring. And that gives a lot of arguments to other goverments to be prepared against US from military prospective.
If you think any of these agencies is going to put a private citizen into orbit for less than $5 million in the next ten years, you are deluding yourself. Recreational space travel has absolutely nothing to do with people who aren't extremely wealthy, at least for the next ten years.
I am surpised in this politically correct day and age that a German satelliete would be called "Jerry" :) Of course I don't even want to go into what Tom implies.
political will that is...
If the citizens of the US or of the member states of the ESA stood up and demanded, right now, that we get a man to mars, it'd be done within 10 years. Just like the moon race, With everyone being fat, happy, clueless, consumers however things will just muddle along. Witness the mustering of political willpower in the wake of 09.11.01, just by way of recent example.
The Feds did a study once... it actually cost less money to fund the Apollo program than it would have to have had all the folks who worked on the project collect welfare (a.k.a. be on the dole for you brits out there).
Conclusions: It's not really (for once) about the money because if the Poly-trick-sters thought they'd get votes for funding the Mars shot, by God they would find the money. It's about balls or in this case the lack thereof.
Thus the West turns it's back on the outside world and proceeds down the path that all other cultures have trod before it...
Assignment: Consider the effect of political willpower on the historical impetus and the lifecycle of host culture...
There will be an essay test on this topic in the morning, bring a blue book and a #2 pencil...
class dismissed
use Signature::Witty;
Especially interesting tidbit from that page: Payload: 118,000 kg. to: 185 km Orbit. at: 28.0 degrees. Payload: 47,000 kg. to a: Translunar trajectory
so without having read the advert. how fast does it go, and how far, given a set amount of pounds.
?
i think US better spend their money that they have to space program rather than sponsoring Israel to slaughter Palestinians' kid & women for throwing stones at Israelis tank. the world should in the other hand should consider US sponsorship to Israel as an act that initiate, spur and promote terrosism.
Peace to the World.