Slashdot Mirror


Utah, the New Red Planet

tsornin writes "The Philadelphia Inquirer reports in this article that Mars Society crews have chosen Wayne County, Utah as an effective simulant for the Red Planet. Although Mars exploration is hardly a high priority on any government's list at the moment, Robert Zubrin and other Mars Society members hope that through their research in Wayne County and in the even more remote northern Canadian location, they can show world governments that a mission to Mars is viable."

42 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. This just in by rde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Latest news:
    The Utah Global Surveyor has detected alcohol in the state. However, it's locked up below the surface in ice and little umbrellas. It does bode well for future explorers, though.

    But seriously, folks... if you haven't read Zubrin's The Case For Mars, do so. You'll be on the streets demanding Mars missions within minutes of finishing it.

    1. Re:This just in by seanellis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you haven't read Zubrin's The Case For Mars, do so. You'll be on the streets demanding Mars missions within minutes of finishing it.

      The current Mars Rush has all the potential to become another Apollo program - siphon off all the money from everything else, in return for 2 weeks of TV coverage, some flag-waving, and then everyone goes back to watching reruns of Star Trek Voyager. Bye bye funding, bye bye Mars, direct or not. And bye bye the rest of the space program.

      Here's a radical thought - long term space projects should be self-funding.

      Mars is at the bottom of an inconveniently large gravity well, so its export potential is severely limited. Exports are essential for an economic entity which is not self-sufficient.

      So, how about a real, useful goal for the space program? I propose that, rather than land a man on Mars (what for?) we resolve, by 2020, to deploy an automated factory on a near-Earth asteroid.

      The factory should make something that would be useful in low Earth orbit (fuel, oxidiser, solar cells, whatever), and be capable of delivering those somethings back to Earth orbit for use. It should produce enough useful stuff to pay back its development and deployment costs well within its design lifetime.

      The ideal "useful something" for our factory to make should really be other factories, but that's a little further down the line. An oxygen/water/methane refinery would be a good start.

      Of course, this won't happen. Good ol' George wants a nice pretty picture of an American astronaut saluting a flag on Mars, not a working space infrastructure.

      Oh well, now I duck and wait for the flames...

    2. Re:This just in by rde · · Score: 2

      First of all, 2020 is, I think, an hopelessly optimistic date. The factory you're talking about would never be manned, and never be repaired. Seeing as you're doing this for the cash, you've got to design a system that won't need repair in a long time; the cost of a repair mission - automated or manned - would offset pretty much any chance of profit for a long time.

      Then, of course, there's the problem with getting there, finding a suitable asteroid, avoiding collisions while parking, finding the right stuff to process, getting the processed materials back to Earth... the list goes ever on.

      It's a good idea. But a lot of work needs to be done before; not just in terms of technology, but having that technology work for proctracted periods in hostile environments. What's needed is somewhere remote, but still within monkeywrenching distance if things do go wrong. And things will go wrong; what you're suggesting would be innovative in almost every respect.

      So: where could we have a base that's remote, manned by the sort of people who'd need to work at maintaining these things, who would as part of their work be testing technology and processes that would be vital to a further understanding of what's necessary for an asteroid mining factory?

      Final point: a Mars mission as outlined by Zubrin (and, increasingly, favoured by NASA) is to send a crew there for six months. That's no two-week propaganda mission.

  2. Tourism? by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    This should do wonders for Wayne County tourism, who can now adopt the slogan:


    Wayne County, only slightly more hospitable than the surface of Mars

    1. Re:Tourism? by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about, Wayne County, like no place on Earth.

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    2. Re:Tourism? by BWJones · · Score: 2

      Actually, there is quite a bit to see in Wayne county including Capitol Reef National Park and Canyonlands which has some of the most beautiful rock formations and hiking in the west. Additionally, star gazing down there away from the lights of big cities can be truly impressive. Why this should be a good area to simulate Mars, I don't know. I can think of more remote places in Utah and Nevada to simulate living on the surface of Mars. After all, while beer can be pretty hard to find in Wayne county, there are a couple of bars in Loa and Hanksville. :-) (not everyone in Utah is a Mormon)

      Seriously though, some of the remote desert locations in Utah and Nevada I used to go to as an undergraduate to look at stars and planets (in addition to strange airplanes) are much more remote requiring more planning and resources than excursions to anywhere in Wayne county.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  3. _Race to Mars_ by Ravagin · · Score: 2

    I found a book in my local library's used book sale room from 1988 titled The Race to Mars (I don't remember the authoring organization and sadly, the book is downstairs and I am far too lazy to get it at this point in the morning).


    It talks about the progresss made, mostly Soviet, up to the date of publication, with lots of cool diagrams and photos.


    What bugs me the most is the introduction, with phrases to the effect of "the Soviets intend to land a man on Mars by the end of the century" and "during the nineties, the Soviets will map and survey mars extensively in preparation for a manned mission."


    And still nobody's there. But I guess it's okay, cause we have Utah....

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  4. ROTFLMAO by Ozan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Martian atmosphere, Zubrin says, is 95 percent carbon dioxide. By combining that with a relatively small amount of hydrogen brought from Earth, the plant would be churning out an ample supply of methane, CH4, and water, H20. The methane would serve as a propellant to get the ERV and the astronauts back home.

    Methane as propellant, uh hu. I'd like to know where the hell Zubrin wants to get the oxygen to burn the methane.

    1. Re:ROTFLMAO by Ozan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that methane has a higher level of energy than carbon dioxide, making it neccessary for the plant to have large - and by large I mean huge - solar cells to get any useable form of energy to process the CO2 to methane. This is just ridiculous.

    2. Re:ROTFLMAO by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, in his book (A Case for Mars) Dr. Zubrin plans on taking along a small nuclear plant (100 kWe) to provide the power needed, and the stoichiometry of producing methane from water and carbon dioxide yields two moles of O2 for every mole of methane produced...

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    3. Re:ROTFLMAO by Razor+Sex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if the atmosphere is 95% C02, that means oxygen is the most abundant element in the Martian atmosphere.

    4. Re:ROTFLMAO by paul.dunne · · Score: 2

      And you are prevented from checking the website or even (gasp!) reading the book by what, exactly?

  5. Utah == Mars as desert == Moon? by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2
    Why not Utah == Mars? Hasn't the desert been used to simulate the Moon? I found this interesting reference (emphasis added):

    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/ ch14-3.htm

    Stafford and Cernan did agree to include a test on Gemini IX to compare optics and radar by performing a rendezvous from above the target vehicle. In this exercise, the Agena would be over the Sahara Desert, which would simulate the lunar surface, and the crew would try to fly down to it, using both radar and optics

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  6. Re:Martians??? by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 2

    So when we go to mars we become Martians???


    No.

    When you go to England, you do not suddenly become British. If you are born in Britain, or live there for some time and obtain resident status - then you are British.

    Presumably, the same would apply for Mars. However, this would suggest some form of Martian Government/Organisation. Presumably, this would be a form of colloboration or partnership between all interested parties.

    Therefore, if you were born on Mars, you could call yourself an "American Martian" or "Chinese Martian", depending on your originating country in the Martian Union. In much the same way that a German could call themselves a German European.

  7. I find this offensive by wackybrit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Frankly, as an honorary Martian I find this offensive.

    Is NASA trying to say that Mars can be compared to a dust bowl inhabited by stray dogs, unintelligent rednecks, Mormons and inbreeders?

    I request that NASA moves this experiment to a place devoid of culture, such as Australia or Germany.

  8. Re:Does anyone remember "Pathfinder"? by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

    The goal of the Mars society is not to get a government handout. While they would be happy if a government decided that mars was a viable destination and began funding it, its not nescisary. If no government steps up, the mars society will get there eventually on donations and the hard work of its members. It may take a hundred years that way, but they will still get there.

    --

  9. Mars like place on Earth by quark2universe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There would be areas of Antarctica that would be more like Mars than Utah with a constant hostile environment due to the extreme cold. You would only need a place not constantly covered in ice. Of course the abundantly rich oxygen and no radiation are other problems in simulating Mars here on Earth. Perhaps the best way to simulate Mars with be through some bio dome like structure with virtual reality.

    The other big question of course is "Why". Why do this at all? Do people really think simulating and then visiting Mars is a possible step in permanent habitation? Our only chance of survival in THIS solar system is here on earth. And any planets revolving around other stars are too far away for us, right now. It's a disservice to get everyones hopes up for living on Mars.

    --

    Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
    1. Re: Mars like place on Earth by Goonie · · Score: 2
      There would be areas of Antarctica that would be more like Mars than Utah with a constant hostile environment due to the extreme cold.

      True, Antarctica would probably have more appropriate mean temperatures, but inappropriate daylight patterns: in summer, near 24-hour days and in winter, 24-hour nights. Any Mars landing would presumably be reasonably close to the equator.

      The other big question of course is "Why". Why do this at all? Do people really think simulating and then visiting Mars is a possible step in permanent habitation? Our only chance of survival in THIS solar system is here on earth. And any planets revolving around other stars are too far away for us, right now. It's a disservice to get everyones hopes up for living on Mars.

      Even if we don't colonize Mars permanently, there are several reasons to go. Most compelling is to go search for life, or past life, and if we find it examine its structure. If we find it and discover it and Earth life evolved from the same source, that tells us that life can make interplanetary (at least) journeys. However, if we find it evolved independently it would suggest life has a pretty good chance of evolving wherever conditions were right. I think it would be worth going just for that purpose.

      Secondly, you assert that it's impossible to colonise Mars. I would argue that we don't really know one way or the other at this point, and a manned mission (or two) is the only way to collect enough data to find out.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    2. Re: Mars like place on Earth by dgroskind · · Score: 2

      ...that tells us that life can make interplanetary (at least) journeys.

      Ignoring for a moment the irony of making an interplanetary journey to determine if life can make an interplanetary journey, it would be an an expensive fact to determine at considerable risk to life and limb.

      Is this fact worth the risk and expense? Given the finite amount of money for basic research, a trip to Mars would mean delaying research into other areas that are arguably more interesting.

      ...a manned mission (or two) is the only way to collect enough data to find out.

      Considering the difficulty of keeping a tiny research station in operation in Antarctica, which is many times more hospitable than Mars, one can say with reasonable certainty that the cost of colonizing Mars is prohibitive. Generally, in science something must be at least theoretically possible before you attempt to prove it.

  10. Planetary Chauvinism by Saeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Trading one gravity well for another is a stupid thing to do (even assuming we had efficient space elevators built on both planets).

    The best 'Case for Mars', IMO, is that it's a (hardly effective) motivator to get us off cradle Earth to secure our survival - people are just USED to living on planets and don't bother thinking outside the gravity well (box).

    What we should be striving for is using the raw material in the asteroid belt to build large (rotating) space habitats which are much much much more efficient than the waste of space/material below your feet on Mars.

    And hey, one day we'll probably disassemble Mars for its matter too -- we'll save Earth for last. :)

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Planetary Chauvinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      baby steps. the moon is closer source of materials for anything we would want to build, including the first plants needed to smelt the ore into something usable. Mining is not easy.

    2. Re:Planetary Chauvinism by JMemmert · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I may be mistaken here, but as far as I remember, one of the great advantages of these gravity wells is that you can forget about the lead underwear in the morning...
      If I remember correctly, you need about a foot of lead between you and outer space to insulate yourself from the radiation... or a gravity well...
      Of course, the efficiency of travel from one planet to another is... well... let's say that there is no really efficient way... only more or less efficient variants, in that I concur.
      So, space stations are a good idea... and new insulation against radiation will be found... eventually... but until then, I'd be very happy if people started developing technologies for more efficient space travel... I'm still waiting for someone to actually get to the asteroid belt...efficient habitats, which are able to deal with micro-asteroids in an adequate manner (i.e. not: "Ok guys, get some insulation and glue and start searching") and a host of other things that, eventially, will lead to usable space stations...

      One more comment... I do remember something about the effects of even a short space flight on the ability to procreate...
      It's been at least 10 years since I heard that, so please correct me, but I think I remember that the damage is significant after only a few hours in space...
      In that case, I'll stick to that gravity well for a while longer...

    3. Re:Planetary Chauvinism by Saeger · · Score: 2
      Yeah, shielding against radiation is a problem, but by the time these habitats are able to be built cheaply I suspect the technology will also be able to solve this problem in one of two ways (that are better than simple mass shielding):

      1) Magnetic shielding

      2) No shielding; any damage to plants, animals, and structure could be repaired by virtue of the fact that everything is infested with "smart nanobots" - basically a artificial immune system for everything (which is also necessary to counter the threat of "terrorist nanobots" since good will outnumber evil :-).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  11. Re:but how do they simulate.. by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the Mars Society is also sponsoring a seperate study called Translife that will involve putting mice in orbit, then spinning up their craft to simulate a 1/3 g environment and see what (if any) effects prolonged low-gravity exposure will have on small furry mammals. A later step will involve a larger orbit and more direct exposure to the sort of radiation levels that Mars-bound astronauts will encounter. The research stations (the first up in the Canadian Arctic, the second in Utah, with Europe and Australia in the works) are just intended to simulate the actual operational side of Mars exploration...

    --
    "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
  12. Re:Martians??? by Saeger · · Score: 2
    I like to label myself Human first and foremost -- my tribe is 6.2 billion strong. :)

    As soon as your start proudly identifying yourself with some smaller 'special' group -- be it national, religious, sexual, whatever -- the stage for conflict is set, especially when you make the group-think the focal point of your life.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  13. Re:but how do they simulate.. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    hmm. Maybe GRACE found a hole in earth's gravity field in Utah. Think it may have something to do with the high density of Mormon's?

  14. green... by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always knew those Utiahns are green! They're just hiding in a human skin! Hmmz, and I thought Roswell was the place to be.

    1. Re:green... by BWJones · · Score: 2

      Green Jello is now the official state food, so perhaps that says something. Mormons have long prided themselves on being different, and I am sure that some of them would love to be considered Martians as it (honestly) might explain some of the theology, but most recently with the Olympics here is SLC, they have gone on a major PR campaign to try and illustrate that they are not at all different from the rest of us.

      All that aside, I for one would like to think that if there were any true Martians, they would have a more sophisticated, intellectually inquisitive and less main-stream white bread culture than we currently have in Utah.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  15. The Human Problem by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The major problems space travel consist of two elements, the thechnology, and the people.

    Spending six months to a year or more in isloation, especially in a very small room no bigger than, and maybe smaller that a college dorm room, with only the food and entertainment you brought with you, can be very stressful.

    Heck, for the nearest current equivalent look at antarctica, where they get snowed in for the winter, and thay have much larger facilities. While now they have email, etc, they are still pretty isolated, and start to get a little wacky after just the few months of social isolation. The culture starts to evolve and drift based on the unique events on the base.

    It is sort of like a bunch of geeks working at a big company. The geeks form their own culture, and are somwhat isolatedfrom the main body of people, even when bumbing into a ton of people in the hall way. Who are the aliens there? the geeks or the working stiffs?

    heck, you even see this in religion, those isolated communities off in the desert, etc.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:The Human Problem by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Spending six months to a year or more in isloation, especially in a very small room no bigger than, and maybe smaller that a college dorm room, with only the food and entertainment you brought with you, can be very stressful.

      While I'm sure that it *can* be stressful, it's not as if this level of exploration is without historical prescident. Throughout history, exploration ships have spent months at sea with small crews.

      Early caravels had crews of 6-8 people. Columbus' flag ship had a crew of 20. These aren't exactly the hundreds of friends you seem to want to bring along with you.

      Plus, our modern-day explorers would be incredibly plugged-in compared with sailors on those old wooden ships. Sure, the scientists in Antarctica had email, but what makes you think the crew of a Mars expedition wouldn't?

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:The Human Problem by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      the working stiffs You arrogant asshole! What makes you think these people are 'stiffs' just because they are not consumed by some stupid, quasi-autistic tech fixation? I conclude these 'stiffs' include your boss and the CEO right?

      Which is the attitude I was critcizing, the Us vs Them attitude between technology haves and have nots.

      This is very easily seen in comedy pages about tech support horror stories, Like Computer Stupidities. This is evidence of what happens when geek culture separates from the culture of those around it.

      Note: in the USA "Working Stiffs" is a generic slang for people who work for a living, vs those born to money, and is a common enough term, and is not usually confused with the dead, except for moments of humor or irony.

      People who recognize the term realize it is a term of respect.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  16. A thousand years from now... by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fry: Very impressive. Back in the 20th Century we had no idea there was a university on Mars.

    Prof.: Well, in those days Mars was just a dreary, uninhabitable wasteland, much like Utah. But unlike Utah it was eventually made livable when the University was founded in 2636.

    Leela: They planted traditional college foliage. Ivy ... trees ... hemp ... soon the whole planet was terra-formed!

    Fry: Does that mean it's safe to breathe the air?

    Prof.: Of course!

  17. MDRS Web by jonwiley · · Score: 2

    For more information about The Mars Society's Mars Desert Research Station, I suggest you have a look at the MDRS Website.

  18. Not sure what to make of them by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was watching a 2 hour Discovery special on the Mars Society Canadian habitat project last night, and I couldn't decide if these guys are visionaries or crackpots.

    One some levels, the organisation was impressive, with tons of construction material being airdropped onto an island. The last drop shed it's 'chute and wrecked the construction crane and some other material. Brought up on a diet of space opera (and Junkyard Wars), I expected them to swing into action with a "can do!" plan. What actually happened was that the project manager and society head had a falling out over safety, the construction team walked off, a new architect had to be flown in, and a long debate over what to do next ensued. OK, they did get it all sorted eventually, but the attitude of some of the team really surprised me. After all, this was an "opportunity" rather than a problem (to use management parlance), but some of them seemed to think that it was better to play it safe, call the whole thing off, and try again the next year. Uh, guys, a manned Mars mission wouldn't have that luxury.

    And then there were the mock EVA suits that they were using, that were - to be brutally frank - kiddie playtime stuff, being mostly trash can lids and plastic tubing. They were quite honest about this, saying that the idea was merely to try out a lot of activities in the suits to try and predict the problems we'll encounter on Mars. Problem was, they failed to apply lessons that we already know, and started with circa 1950's technology. The big problems were that the helmets fogged up (duh), that it's hard to get items out of your own pockets (so you need mirrors on your wrists, which they knew that NASA suits already have but didn't put on their own suits) and that it's hard to read dim LCD screens through a fogged up helmet.

    I really do want to be enthusiastic about the Mars Society, but I can't help but feel that it's a big talking shop and mutual support society for very frustrated people who really wish that some serious money would get put into a Mars mission. It's hard to criticize them for doing something, but it's also hard to take Mars Society seriously when they seem to be more like a Disney Space Camp group having a fun vacation rather than doing bona fide boundary pushing experimentation.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  19. Comparison by justharv · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mars:
    Has no strip clubs.
    Has no alcohol.
    Has no dirty mags.

    Utah:
    Has no strip clubs.
    Has no alcohol.
    Has no dirty mags.

    Logical.

  20. Already Done by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

    Hasn't this already been done?

    Didn't they just pick some desert in the US for the manned missions to the moon too?

  21. OK, better get this out of the way _now_ by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

    *insert obligitory cliche about Wayne County, Utah being devoid of intelligent life*

    *return to your regularly scheduled thread*

    *sigh*

    I'm glad that's over with ;)

  22. Um, duh? The Moon? by doubleyou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would've thought that the Moon would be more of "an effective simulant for the Red Planet" than Utah (or any other place on Earth) could ever be. But then again, what do I know. Let's just jump into the deep end and see what happens. If we fail, then so what if people won't fund us for another hundred years.

  23. Re:We need to get the US space program back on tra by dgroskind · · Score: 2

    The space race will begin in earnest again very soon. Once the Chinese start their manned missions....

    The Cold War is over and there's no propaganda victory to be had by space travel. The U.S. should base its spending on basic research on something more substantial than international public relations.

    The net effect of the U.S. being first to the Moon is that it is not getting criticized for abandoning its lunar landing program. Whoever goes to Mars first is going to wonder how they'll pay for the next trip and what they'll get out of it.

  24. Re:Martians??? by odaiwai · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> The goal, he said, is to simulate as closely as
    >> possible the working conditions that future
    >> Martians would have to endure.

    > So when we go to mars we become Martians???

    Far worse that that, there's a chance of meeting Donny Osmond!

    Aieee!

  25. Re:Martians??? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

    No, we become Mormon Missionaries.

    Yeah, Mormon Martian Missionaries. By the time everyone in the trip reaches Mars they'll all be married and pregnant. Which means they should pack for colonization because they'll have more mouths to feed if they start heading back. Hey, at least they'll have accurate genealogical records.

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  26. Re:Fake Mars Landing? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

    as well as the solar radiation on the moon and extreme heat (+250 degrees in the sunlight, -250 degrees in the shade) which for some strange reason didn't affect any of the film in their cameras. Remember that three weeks after Hiroshima, residual radiation was enough to ruin most photo negatives; the radiation in deep space and from the sun is much more intense.

    Uh, the cameras could have lead shielding and LEAD GLASS (lead glass [def] glass that contains lead oxide and that has a high refractive index and optical dispersion; used in the manufacture of optical glass, in high-quality crystal glassware, and for radiation shielding.) What do you think they used?

    Hint: Google search [ lead glass x-ray ]
    Hint: Google search [ lead shielding thickness ]

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.