Diablo II Patch for Mac OS X Released

soquelraj writes "Blizzard has released the long awaited patch they promised three months ago at MacWorld SF 2002 to allow Diablo II and Diablo II LoD to run native on Mac OS X. This was the last reason I was booting into Mac OS 9 for any reason (I could never stand not having direct access to my video hardware running the game via Classic). The performance (at least on the first quick spin I took tonight after downloading) under OpenGL looks to be much smoother than anything previous -- but regardless, this makes my Mac OS X experience complete."

Comments

Re:MacOS Cannot Be Secure

[Anonymous Coward]

While I don't think you deserved to be modded down for this, I do think it's really cheap of you to recycle your posts. Let's see some more originality.

Nice commitment from Blizzard

[Niherlas]

As was pointed out on another website, MacOS X hadn't even shipped in public beta form when Diablo II was released. While I'm sure that the OSX updates for WarCraft II, StarCraft, and Diablo II are mostly applications of things Blizzard developers have learned as part of the WarCraft III development cycle, it's still very good of Blizzard to release those efforts to the Mac gaming public.

Then again, I'd also wager that Diablo II (and LOD) has sold enough copies to recoup Blizzard's investment at this point - and the goodwill they're generating amongst the OSX-using community will just translate into additional sales for WarCraft III when it hits the bricks. Not much, granted (I'm realistic about MacOS market share), but every bit helps, neh?

Re:In my defense

[TRACK-YOUR-POSITION]

I wrote these as templates for common Slashdot stories. So you'll see originality from me when you see originality from them.

That said, I suppose I could write more than one template for the case where we get two MacOS (or whatever) stories back to back like this. So any story about MacOS is unoriginal? Or is it any story about computers? Any story about news for nerds, maybe? ;)

Re:In my defense

[jasonwileymac.com]

What the hell does any of this have to do with the Diablo II patch?

Re:In my defense

[Anonymous Coward]

Nothing, whih was why it was modded down to start with.

Timing.

[saintlupus]

Now if I only had a time machine that could take me back a year and a half, to when I was actually playing that game...

--saint

Re:Timing.

[doooras]

I envy you. I have been playing D2 for almost 2 years now. LOD now, of course. And I can't stop. Well... except for a short layover for Elite Force about a year ago. Love the trek, baby!

Having Blizzard suport is helpful.

[jellomizer]

Blizzard being one of the more influncial game compaines out there porting/patching thier application to OS X may give other smaller companies reasons to port to OS X.

Starcraft is even older

[Japanese Fuckslut]

...and already released for OS X. And if memory serves me correctly, Unreal Tournament, a non-Blizzard product, is also older than Diablo II.

Re:Starcraft is even older

[Niherlas]

Starcraft and Warcraft II are both older, yes. Also arguably simpler than Diablo II, more directly related to the WarCraft III development cycle, and (most importantly) both are stable products.

Diablo II and LOD, on the other hand, was being actively patched and updated until December of last year.

And Unreal Tournament... well, the OSX port is entirely unsupported - it's a "in my spare time" project from the president of Westlake Interactive, and still hasn't progressed past "Preview Release 2".

so when will they

[jjshoe]

so when will they jump on the band wagon and make a n executable for linux?

Diablo for Mac is SLOW

[dangil]

I dont know about you, but for me, diablo 2 is unplayable on a mac..

at least with a geforce 2mx graphics card....

I think it has something to do with Nvidia horrible macos drivers..

but a underpowered (even a celeron 300) PC can play diablo2 much better then my 733 G4 can...

quake3, on the other hand, runs like a charm... so its not a matter of hardware...

please NVIDIA. fix MacOS drivers (both X an 9)
please BLIZZZZZARD. make Nvidia fix those drivers!

Re:Diablo for Mac is SLOW

[Juanvaldes]

Yeah, its' nVidia's crappy drivers. My GF just got a new iMac and was VERY Disapointed to find that her 700Mhz G4 w/GF2MX was pulling 5-15 fps, 5 during combat. On the other hand my dual 450 (single 450 to the game of course) w/Rage Pro 128 is capped at 25 in single player. (for those who don't know D2 caps the fps @25 in single player mode)

Re:Diablo for Mac is SLOW

[CottonEyedJoe]

The readme file mentions this. The solution is to use software rendering. On my 500 MHz iBook using software rendering it plays fine...not quite as fast as the same machine under OS 9/RAVE but its fast enough to play the game.

Re:Diablo for Mac is SLOW

[dangil]

and what about the skip rating ?

i tested diablo 2 both in my 733 quicksiver, and my athlon XP 1600+.... 25fps, and 25 skip.. average numbers...

what about this numbers on a PC or Mac with a Voodoo 3 ,4 or even 5 ?

Cant even get it to work

[obi-1-kenobi]

I have tryed servel times, and I am not able to get this sucker to work.... :( I hope others have more luck than I.

Complete?

[Dolly_Llama]

this makes my Mac OS X experience complete."

Maybe its just me, but my Mac OSX experience won't be complete until I have two things 1) OSX Native Matlab and 2) Counter-Strike. Purely my opinion..

Re:Complete?

[twiztidlojik]

Too bad Sierra ported Half-Life to every platmorm known to man (probably to VMS, OS/2, DOS 1.0, and Amiga) and not to the Macintosh, even when the code was nearly done. The last thing they should have done was piss off one of the most vocal computer user groups. I mean, if you wanted to piss a group off, why don't you try the Linux users? They take it all the time from the people who provide their OS, so they wouldn't make a big noise at all ;D

Floppies and Diablo II

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, but Diablo II needs no floppies.

Why does anybody need a 1.44 mb floppy anymore on a computer? They are totally obsolete! When was the last time I used a 1.44 mb floppy? Oh....let's see...2 and a half freakin years ago!!

Get rid of the stinkin' floppies!! We don't need no stinkin' flops!

Be a man, and get a cd-r!

A Welcome Update

[Spencerian]

Blizzard is one of those great software companies that, literally, help keep Macintosh gaming legitimate. For them to create an update for D2 for Mac OS X is such a sign.

Other companies, from Freeverse and Ambrosia (hail Andrew Welch, god of Code), to Aspyr Media (bless them for Tomb Raider, Sims, and Deus Ex ports, et al.) all show that the good games do come to the Macintosh, and the future for games look good.

However, Apple needs to work on a better HID software solution. We went from InputSprockets (a nice and highly flexible solution) to nothing in OS X. If complex games such as Descent are to be ported, joysticks and other devices must be fully supported.

I'll repeat what others have noted about the update: OS X has good OpenGL, but those with nVidia video may suffer performance problems or even (gasp!) kernel panics. Software rendering works great, and is actually faster than OpenGL with less overhead.

Like other OS before it, try to avoid running a gazzillon apps while D2 is running. It still needs a respectable RAM amount, even though the OS allocates it now. And, keep Classic off--its a resource hog.

D2 runs great!

[Anonymous Coward]

OS X version runs great for me -- I bought and set aside LOD just for this very day. Now I ripped that biatch open and it's like having D2 brand new all over again. OS X is such a wicked game platform... Props to Blizzard on Starcraft too... now if Aspyr could get their lame ass act together and get RTCW out the door. I guess Harry Potter was more important. Any die hard Mac gamers out their playing Harry Potter? I didn't think so,....

argh...

[3nd3r]

I wanted to buy an Ibook for the productivity I would get from not having incredibly addictive games available... oh whoa's me. whoa's me. the end is near.

whats with the big ass HP ad...

[Anonymous Coward]

stupid ad, stupid.

Oh great

[geek]

As if I didn't already have enough distractions. I spent 6 hours playing this today. Thanks a lot Blizzard, I'm supposed to be job hunting.

If I keep this up I'll go blind.

diablo2... *shudder*

[mshurpik]

...but regardless, this makes my Mac OS X experience complete.

Wow, Diablo II on a Mac. You are a tool.

Let me summarize your life for you:

1. Pound big, fat mouse button.
2. Wait for super armor/tower shield/perfect diamond.
3. Pound button some more.

Most people use all ten of their fingers. Congratulations, you've learned how to use one. Upgrade to Windows, maybe you can exercise a second one. But first make sure to get that tower shield.

Re:diablo2... *shudder*

[welkin]

Yet another troll who knows how to point & laugh at one-button Mac mice and who is misguided enough to call a trip from the Mac OS to the Windows family of products an upgrade. You reveal sparkling maturity by picking on a geek for enjoying something you can't, and I'm the troll who is willing to state the obvious, that your comments are dull. Duh, of course DII is a treasure hunt/version of Gauntlet gone off the deep end. There's no accounting for taste, dude. Go troll some other post pile.

Re:MacOS Cannot Be Secure

[Anonymous Coward]

95 has never had a break in due to design *ever*?! That's not too shabby for an operating system with *no* concept of system security.

I want some of what you're smoking.