Wireless Monitors?
antiopus writes "I didn't think it was possible anytime soon due to bandwidth considerations, but ViewSonic has announced a wireless monitor. At only 10 inches and 800x600, I don't know if it'll be replacing my CRT anytime soon, but I can certainly foresee some interesting applications for wearable/portable computing."
Sheesh.
-- Hulver's site
Now I can pump even MORE radiation into my brain. My cell phone, pager, laptop, computer, wireless mouse/keyboard and CB radio aren't enough... Must... have... cancer...
Dave------
http://cooltech.org
If it ain't cool, it ain't coolt
Under 'Liberate yourself from your desktop'
"Establish a one-to-one relationship with your PC."
Sorry, I prefer to be a slut and have relationships with lots of PCs.
If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
Shoot.. no:
Rechargeable 1800 mAh Lithium Ion Battery Pack
This is no monitor. it's a remote tablet for your PC.
I work in the RF industry as a software engineer... I'm by no means an RF engineer, but I have to comment.
First of all, this is not a wireless monitor. It is a portable PC that communicates with other PCs via a network card. The video signal is NOT sent over the air.
The bandwidth requirements for a wireless monitor are impractical. It's certainly possible, but the amount of RF bandwidth and/or power required to do it would either kill you, cook your intestines or give you a nice bout of cancer, depending on how you implement it.
Just a quick estimation (please don't criticize this, I have other work to do):
800 x 600 = 480,000 pixels
480 pixels x 16-bit = 7.68 Mb = 960 kB
960 kB x 60 Hz = 57.6 MB / s!
Given that 802.11b provides 11 Mb as a MAXIMUM (yes, that's bits, which translates to 1.4 MB / s), we'd only have about 1/50th the bandwidth necessary. And that doesn't account for automatic rate switching, interference, and other nodes on the network.
I'm an MIS Manager at a small company, and I very often find myself wishing that I had a portable wireless monitor. We run a lot of machines headless, and when they have problems, dragging a monitor over to them can be a real pain. What if all I had to do was get within range, turn on my display, and diagnose the problem? Man, that'd be sweet.
-- Have you ever noticed that at trade shows, Microsoft is always the company that is handing out stress balls?
Sheesh - just get one of these and a wireless card. Save yourself $100's. ..plus it runs Linux, use it as a wireless remote, mp3 player, etc..
"I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
Just look at RDP over IP, works fine, even over a 56Kb modem connection.
European Linux user, living in Antwerp
Why is having a wireless monitor so hard to fathom? I'm watching a wireless "monitor" now in fact. Its called my television. Seems to get channels fine from "thin" air. These images are transmitted by a remote "base station".... they even have a high resolution model available in some places. I think that we have the tech but its not being looked at correctly. Just my thoughts.
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
Latency, schmatency. Build it into the hardware. You get an video card with your standard VGA out, and a transmitter. The card also has some image compression software built in; say, just for arugment sake, PNG. Your wireless reciever, with an LCD screen, has a hardware PNG decoder. Boom. So long as you're not doing full scream video or motion graphics, you're MORE than covered. But even that's overkill. Use something like X, or RDP, where you're not transmitting the screen, you're transmitting the drawing instructions, and the HID coords and actions. Suddenly, instead of transmitting several thousand grey pixels to make your task bar, you're sending 'draw a grey rectangle from here to here.' and being done with it.
Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
All I need to have is a few of these on my desk: "Damn it! Where did I put that desktop!?!?!?"
hah. was i the only one that read that and thought:
That's no moon. That's a space station.
maybe I'm just odd....
Check out my sysadmin blog!