Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Monitors?

antiopus writes "I didn't think it was possible anytime soon due to bandwidth considerations, but ViewSonic has announced a wireless monitor. At only 10 inches and 800x600, I don't know if it'll be replacing my CRT anytime soon, but I can certainly foresee some interesting applications for wearable/portable computing."

8 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. This isn't a wireless monitor by Hulver · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's a MS tablet PC, running WinCE. Looking at the site will show you that.

    Sheesh.

  2. Just love that marketing-speak by sacremon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Under 'Liberate yourself from your desktop'

    "Establish a one-to-one relationship with your PC."

    Sorry, I prefer to be a slut and have relationships with lots of PCs.

    --
    If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
  3. Wireless Monitor? Not happening... by jgore26785 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in the RF industry as a software engineer... I'm by no means an RF engineer, but I have to comment.

    First of all, this is not a wireless monitor. It is a portable PC that communicates with other PCs via a network card. The video signal is NOT sent over the air.

    The bandwidth requirements for a wireless monitor are impractical. It's certainly possible, but the amount of RF bandwidth and/or power required to do it would either kill you, cook your intestines or give you a nice bout of cancer, depending on how you implement it.

    Just a quick estimation (please don't criticize this, I have other work to do):

    800 x 600 = 480,000 pixels
    480 pixels x 16-bit = 7.68 Mb = 960 kB
    960 kB x 60 Hz = 57.6 MB / s!

    Given that 802.11b provides 11 Mb as a MAXIMUM (yes, that's bits, which translates to 1.4 MB / s), we'd only have about 1/50th the bandwidth necessary. And that doesn't account for automatic rate switching, interference, and other nodes on the network.

  4. I always find myself needed a wireless monitor by automatic_jack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm an MIS Manager at a small company, and I very often find myself wishing that I had a portable wireless monitor. We run a lot of machines headless, and when they have problems, dragging a monitor over to them can be a real pain. What if all I had to do was get within range, turn on my display, and diagnose the problem? Man, that'd be sweet.

    --

    -- Have you ever noticed that at trade shows, Microsoft is always the company that is handing out stress balls?

  5. Sounds like an Audrey to me. by cisco_rob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sheesh - just get one of these and a wireless card. Save yourself $100's. ..plus it runs Linux, use it as a wireless remote, mp3 player, etc..

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  6. Re:Compression, compression, compression by cobbaut · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Caching is important here...except for playing video's, your computermonitor is 99% the same as it was 1/50th of a second before that.


    Just look at RDP over IP, works fine, even over a 56Kb modem connection.

    --
    European Linux user, living in Antwerp
  7. Someday, I'll have... by mblase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...of course, in a house where we can't even keep the cordless phone on its recharger for more than five minutes and stash the remote control in a new location every day, this will probably be less of a boon than some people think.

  8. Odd, I've seen this before someplace. by Pyrosz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why is having a wireless monitor so hard to fathom? I'm watching a wireless "monitor" now in fact. Its called my television. Seems to get channels fine from "thin" air. These images are transmitted by a remote "base station".... they even have a high resolution model available in some places. I think that we have the tech but its not being looked at correctly. Just my thoughts.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.