Slashdot Mirror


The New Nomad Jukebox, And Handheld Oggs

Tha_Zanthrax writes: "The best portable MP3-player has become better! The people from Tbreak.com have recieved a Nomad/Creative Jukebox 3. They have yet to write a review but have put up some detailed pics on their messageboard. It's a bit smaller, but the best improvements are the firewire-port and the 2 (!) internal batteries for 22 hours of operation. Too bad I recieved my Creative JB2 last week ..." If you have a hankering to play Ogg Vorbis audio, though, it looks like the first handheld ogg player has finally arrived in the form of a (payware) app for the Sharp Zaurus called tkc Player, available from theKompany. Where's there's one, there will be more. Woo-hoo!

56 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Next by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the next improvement should be a cynic inside the machine, who would scold you appropriatly if you were listening to N'Sync, or congratulate you for picking Radiohead.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  2. Whats the difference... by afinn · · Score: 3, Informative

    .. between this and nomad v2? Basically it's got a firewire port and lithium ion batteries. Some more details available here.

  3. Color faceplates by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2
    Do people actually care about the colored templates one can snap on the face? It seems kinda silly... and my experience with similar devices has been that over time the one I'm using ends up getting cracked.

    After rolling through all three (or whatever) faceplaces, the unit ends up looking naked; there's no way I'm going to plunk down $20 + S&H for a new set.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Color faceplates by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree faceplates tend to be cheap, and oriented to the fashion conscience. However, they have uses.

      My sister-in-law carries her cellphone in her purse (a lot of dresses just don't have pockets). When it rang, she had a hard time finding it. Flip-o change-o to a bright colored faceplate and the problem was solved.

      The real issue with faceplates is when they're cheap pieces of plastic, as opposed to those made for cellphones which tend to be more rugged.

    2. Re:Color faceplates by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eh?

      Just because you don't like something, doesn't make it "wrong" for others to like it.

      The new XP look is nicer than the old Windows look, just like I prefer the "metal2" icewm theme to "warp4." Does that make me a "most vomitous" person?

      Never underestimate the superficiality of some people who think that just because someone's taste in what looks good is different, they're stupid.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  4. Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a mini-disc player/recorder that not only "supports" mp3/ogg/wav/etc, but will also play them in their original format instead of converting it to an ATRAC file (such as the new Sony NET mini-disc players). No matter what happens to the price of CF cards, it will be a very long time before it can compete with the cost of a single 700MB mini-disc. These hard drive driven portables and such would have a hard time competing in terms of cost of unit + media, weight of the player, and size.

    1. Re:Still waiting... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      And I'm still waiting for a minidisc player that lets me upload recordings to my computer in faster-than-real time. I guess the current belief (SONY NetMD) is that allowing the minidisc player to do so would promote piracy.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    2. Re:Still waiting... by BelDion · · Score: 2

      Couple of points there AC.

      Minidiscs do not hold 700mb of data, they only hold 160mb(the 74 minute discs anyway, not 100% sure about the 80 mins.) There was once an actual minidisc data drive for the pc which failed pretty much because they were small capacity, though the fact that they were slow as frell also weighed in heavily.

      I can't disagree about an actual mp3 holding md player though, that would be an incredible toy. Even at 160mb, with CAN$6 discs, it wouldn't be a problem. But hey, I'm fine until then with what I have. Recording real-time doesn't bother most of the real md fan(atics?). NetMD is available too, though majorly crippled by Sony's piracy protection.

      The (Hopefully) Great Slashdot Blackout , April 21-27

      --

      I am BelDion's .Sig; Who the hell is Jack?
    3. Re:Still waiting... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      Try this. Okay, so it's not really minidisc, but it's mini-CD, which is cheaper and holds just as much. I bought this device when it first came out, and I absolutely love it so far. It doesn't play anything but WAV, CDDA, and MP3, but for the price, I can't really complain. The best part is the flexibility, though. Three little pocket-sized miniCD's will hold about 10 hours of music. And I think there's supposed to be mini-CDRW's on the horizon, which are slated to cost less than $2.00 each (which i'm sure will come down over time)...then you get the added value of being able to rewrite on the same discs, just like flash memory or minidisc.

    4. Re:Still waiting... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, lets see.
      74 minutes of decent quality for $2 a disc
      $150 for a MD-player/recorder.
      740 minutes = $20+$150
      Weight of 20 discs + weight of MD player?
      Realtime upload; 2x if you're lucky. Is there a 4x?

      iPod
      $399 for 5gb
      3000+ minutes = 6.5oz
      $499 for 10gb
      6000+ minutes = 6.5oz
      Near instantaneous upload; 74 minutes of music in 10 seconds of upload. 2 gb of music in 4 minutes

      Just to be fair, I *do* own both a minidisc and an iPod, but the MD is now relegated for note-taking and recording purposes, rather than music :)

    5. Re:Still waiting... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Very impressive, but still not available.

      MSRP of $350, when you consider that an iPod was available 6 months ago, at $400.

  5. Ogg Vorbis Player by j09824 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a bunch of excellent, free graphical Ogg Vorbis players for X11, and they even work on small screens and handhelds. Why ever would you pay money for something like tkcPlayer?

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by kenydl · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the major break-through is that this implementation uses a "fixed-point decoder".

      I believe the major problem with ogg was that it was very floating-point intensive, which doesn't suit the processors used in mp3 players and PDAs. theKompany must have developed or implemented a non floating point version of the decoder, thus enabling it to be used on the Zaurus without a huge cpu hit.

      --
      .sig (insert funny sig here)
    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by sydb · · Score: 2

      I thought Xiph were dedicated to free software and open standards.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      I remember reading ~6 months ago that one of the key Ogg devs was working on an example fixed-point decoder. IIRC, it was assembly for a specific architecture, but was touted as being somewhat portable. theKompany may have used that decoder, or they may have written their own.

      I suppose the point is, there is, or will be soon, a decoder for portable devices.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  6. more details about tckPlayer by HeUnique · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find more details about the tckPlayer here - it can be bought as a single stand alone app or it can be bought in a package of 9 applications for (for Zaurus) for $74.95 (details are here)

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  7. The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though you have to download software seperately if your a Windows user, Apple's 10 GB iPod is by far and away better.

    There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior.

    It's got a 10 GB HD, 32 MB of Ram, the battery life is 10 hours, you can store your contacts on it, you can use it as a hard drive, you can even *BOOT* off it. There are also 3rd party apps to extend the functionality.

    And still it's less then half the size of this thing!

    For me, that's a key feature This thing is way too big for my pocket (the Nomad is *still* discman size!). It's just not practicle, whereas my iPod fit's in my shirt pocket (and isn't nearly as heavy).

    The iPod is so small, and it's interface so simple and elegant, that I take it everywhere, even just nipping down the to the shop. I know I'd think twice before taking this thing outside with me.

    I guess it depends on how much you like music.

    - If your a big music fan, then your better off with something cassete player sized (ThinkGeek has one, though bigger that the iPod, it has slightly more storage, and still of a practicle in-your-pocket size)

    - If your not a big music fan and only want something for long journeys then this could be the unit for you. But if you are, you'd be better getting a discman for 30 USD instead...

    1. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      "There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior."

      It depends on your needs again. I realise that a lot of people love their iPods, but I wish they'd see that it's not the perfect solution for everyone. I have some 1500 cds in my collection. The power of an MP3 player for me is that I can decide to listen to THAT Dark Star or Black Clouds or Tweezer and odds are I'd have it with me. 10 gigs just doesn't cut it.

    2. Re:The Best? Hardly! by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Even though you have to download software seperately if your a Windows user, Apple's 10 GB iPod is by far and away better.

      There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior.

      It's got a 10 GB HD, 32 MB of Ram, the battery life is 10 hours, you can store your contacts on it, you can use it as a hard drive, you can even *BOOT* off it. There are also 3rd party apps to extend the functionality.


      Waitaminute. Only 10Gb HD? The Nomad Jukebox 2 has 20Gb today .

      The new Jukebox 3 will also have 20Gb, Firewire, etc. for the price of a 5Gb iPod.

      What's superior about the iPod again? Oh... yeah... the size.

      Well, sod the size. I want to carry my entire MP3 collection without paying a massive premium on top of the price of a Toshiba card-drive.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      I agree that for many people it's a great player. My point is that, for me, it's more important to have storage space than a faster one time upload. Different people have different needs. How does saying that make me a jerk?

    4. Re:The Best? Hardly! by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      • iPod has only 10GB? WTF can you store on that? THe Nomad has 20 Gb TODAY and the Nomad 3 is going to have 30GB and firewire.
      • Nomad can play 3rd party formats, iPod can't
      • iPod only works with Mac. If you want to use it wirh Windows you have to buy 3rd party software. And good luck getting it to work in Linux at all (I know there are efforts, but from what I have seen none have come to fruition yet). The Nomad works with Mac, Windows, AND Linux, out of the box. There is even a Nomad KIO Slave, so yes, you can use it as a hard drive,

        Why id iPod superior again? Oh yeah, cause you own one. Sorry bub, that doesn't cut it for me.

    5. Re:The Best? Hardly! by -Harlequin- · · Score: 2

      Most poeple have less than 200 CD's (which the iPod can store).

      It depends. I have far fewer CDs than that on my (archos) player and are past 10gig - since my player has a digital output, thus can drive a decent home sound system without degrading it through the less-than-amazing analogue systems necessitated by portability, suddenly the bitrates that are more than sufficient for portable listening are not quite enough for listening under situations so much closer to ideal. But the ipod doesn't offer optical or coax digital output (from memory), so it's apples and oranges anyway.

      But more to the point, I have several gig of data files on my player also. So 10gig is just too small for a lot of people, but the ipod is still a fantastic unit, and I find that I recommend it to more people than the archos. (Eg, I wouldn't recommend archos to my grandmother :).

      Yeah, the size of the nomad is crappy. I understand why people like the ipod player, and I understand why people like the (later-model) archos players and recorders, but I just don't really get what people see in the nomad. And it seems to be one of the more crippled brands as well (though nothing next to sony's digital rubbish - utterly fantastic technology, but insultingly crippled and proprietary. What a shame.)

      Strange.

    6. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      Even if I can't fit all 1500 cds onto a player, I'd rather have one that lets me get closer to that goal. Since I use it at work or in my car, the size of the player isn't that important. Why is this hard to understand?

  8. Payware by Phexro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though the player is payware, I'm sure it's worth it. It sure looks like it from the screenshots.

    theKompany is a good company which has done a lot for the KDE /FS community. They have developed Aethera, Kamera, KDE Studio, Kivio, and Kugar, all of which are available under the GPL for free.

    Support the companies that support Free Software. Buy something from theKompany.

  9. Re:the best ? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPOD also has the size advantage - ie it will fit in your trouser, or shirt, pockets without any problems. You are going to need cargo pants for the RIO. Size makes a big difference when it comes to usability, and for most intents and purposes the 10Gb configuration of the iPOD is plenty for many people. I don't have either but I would rather put my money down for the iPOD, especially since it looks good.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  10. brrrrrr... by koekepeer · · Score: 2, Funny

    they're playing "modern talking" on the tkc player. they *must be evil*

    ;-)

  11. Where is my code for this? by bagder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Archos MP3 player series at least have this ambitious crowd of hackers working on replacing the firmware with an open source alternative:

    http://bjorn.haxx.se/rockbox/

  12. Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by jbridges · · Score: 5, Informative

    Archos model 500277
    Jukebox MP3 Recorder 20 - 20GB HD (USB 2.0)

    PriceWatch lists it for $315

    Jukebox MP3 Recorders / USB Hard Drives

    Can both record and playback MP3s

    USB 2.0 is standard on newer PCs

    1. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by osolemirnix · · Score: 2

      True, but it's GUI sucks and it doesn't support playlists or ID3 tags. I have yet to see a test of the sound output quality. If you want a cheap portable HD with MP3 player on the side, go for the Archos.
      If you want a really nice MP3 player, I suggest the Nomad or iPod.

      Disclaimer: I'm not trying to flamebait or troll. A friend of mine has the Archos and likes it, but I think it has some serious drawbacks.

      --

      Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
    2. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by -Harlequin- · · Score: 2

      True, but it's GUI sucks and it doesn't support playlists or ID3 tags. I have yet to see a test of the sound output quality.

      You seem to be confused - you're probably thinking of the ancient Archos mp3 player insead of the 20GB recorder he was talking about. Not only does it support ID3 and playlists (you can even make new ones in the field, or drag and drop your fav winamp playlists from your computer), and have a great GUI, it has a digital output!
      That means that as wellas using it as a portable player, when I get home I can plug it into my home theatre system directly via the digital, and the results are amazing compared to connecting any other portable CD, MD, or mp3 player I've ever had (because portable units by neccessity don't have fantastic analogue systems, and normally you have to connect them via analogue jack - and with a good sound system, this is more apparent than portable listening in heavy traffic).

      On top of that, it has both analogue and digital input (it records), fits in your pocket (unlike the Nomad), and unlike the iPod it has replaceable batteries (so you can take it camping) and upgradable HDD. The upgradable HDD is important because of the digital output - when you're using this unit with a home sound system, then 128bps (more than enough for portable listening) doesn't cut it anymore, and you'll want space for bigger files.

      Actually, I lie, I think you void your warrentee by upgrading it yourself, but that didn't stop me jumping to 30gig :-)

      Oh, and it's the least crippled HDD mp3 player that I know of. I think copyright compliance is the responsibility of the user, and should not be enforced by function and feature cripples in the unit. So I boycott crippleware.

      That said, I wouldn't recommend it to everyone. But for what I want, it's great. I'm mainly writing this because you posted mistakenly.

  13. It's down... by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 3, Informative

    another source for news on Nomad JB's has some info too. http://www.nomadness.com/

  14. The best MP3 player? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't understand. The posting starts off saying, "The best portable MP3-player has become better!" and then goes on to talk about the battery munching USB wielding Bigger Than A Discman Nomad.

    Was there an editorial problem? Shouldn't we have heard about it when the story broke? "The best MP3 player on the planet just got even better." It's small, it's got battery life beyond what I thought possible and the transfer rate over [IEEE 1394|Firewire|iLink] is pretty good.

    Of course, that announcement was like a month ago.

    1. Re:The best MP3 player? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Er, WTF are you talking about. The Nomad 3 has a firewire interface, and at 30 GB and OGG capable for the same price, it pretty much beats the piss out of the iPod. Not to mention it works in Windows (without buying 3rd party software) and Linux

    2. Re:The best MP3 player? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      It looks like about 4-5 times the size of the iPod, and I seriously doubt that it's Ogg compatible.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  15. IGN has a preview of the Jukebox3 too... by psxndc · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://gear.ign.com/articles/317/317470p1.html. The site listed here was slashdotted so:
    • Firewire port
    • USB port
    • 2 line outs
    • head phone out
    • Mic/optical input (sorry iPod fans, your baby doesn't have this one. I wish it did, but it don't)
    • 20 Gig Drive

    And they've shrunk it. It's still bigger than the iPod by a good amount, but it appears to be less-than-CD-player size (see the site)

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  16. And it's a hard drive! by samael · · Score: 2

    I use mine all the time for transporting gigs of data about the place.

  17. Re:the best ? by zzyzx · · Score: 2

    Depends on your needs. I'm finding that the 20 gig hd my Neo has isn't large enough and plan to throw a 30-40 gig drive in. The 10 gig cap and the fact that it won't work well with my computer makes the iPod not the best player for me.

  18. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2
    Funny,
    I have EphPod working on a WinNT 4/sp6 machine, and have MediaFour's Xplay working on a win2k box. (Still waiting for development to firm up a bit on linux communications).

    As for iTunes management, that's only if you have it be the primary machine. You can move music around without having to have it on the machine first.

    Go to MetaMage.com and get EscapePod to move mp3s off the iPod to iTunes.

    Or, get iPod Free File Sync...

    Or, get PodMaster...

    So, there are a range of options you haven't tried to make managing your music a little more flexible.

    --

  19. I hope they support it better than the original. by biafra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I purchased the original 6GB NJB, and although it does work well as a MP3 player there are a lot of bugs that Creative will probably never fix. Some of these bugs sound simple to correct (eg. no line wrap on long song titles), but I now suspect that firmware development for the first NJB is done (last update sometime last year). I'm not sure when I will learn my lesson and stop buying creative products. They used to be a really great company and I have bought thousands of dollars worth of their products over the years (from several of the original soundblasters all the way to Live5.1 bla bla bla's, video cards, you name it). In the past few years I've just started to feel like support beyond their latest gizmo is not a priority for them. Oh well my next MP3 player purchase is a few months away so we'll see how the reviews are....

    --
    :wq
  20. Ogg by austad · · Score: 2

    I thought Ogg wouldn't play on an ARM based device because the decoder supplied by Xiph used floating point, and the ARM processor has no FPU?

    Did someone make a non-FPU version of the decoder? Or does the kernel on the Zaurus have FPU emulation enabled?

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:Ogg by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did someone make a non-FPU version of the decoder?

      Yes. Xiph. They have two decoders. One is free but requires floating point. The other is commercial and only needs integers (and judging from some of Monty's posts, it sounds like the integer player even includes some hand-crafted assembly code specifically for ARM).

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Ogg by mcspock · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is incorrect; the xiph integerized codebase is pure C. There is another integerized vorbis decoder which only plays up to beta4 content available at http://ivdev.sourceforge.net, but this is not endorsed or supported by xiph.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  21. Re:first Ogg? I think not by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    The fact that it holds 40 megs per disk has nothing to do with the fact that it can indeed play OGG files.....(BTW -- 40 megs is a lot if you are listening to audio books at 24K)

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  22. Amen by sulli · · Score: 2
    My 5 GB iPod is the best electronic device I have bought in years. If only I could trade it in for a 10 GB one ... but dem's da breaks.

    Size matters!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  23. Re:Statically linked FPU emu by mcspock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is incorrect; the strongarm 206mhz processor in the zaurus is not fast enough to decode ogg real time using floating point emulation. It's close, but not quite.

    Pocket MP3 players typically use a cirrus 7212 74mhz arm processor, which are much faster than you describe (decode at less than 60% of the cpu). Also, as a side note, decoding 192kbps is easier than decoding, say, 96kbps; you just spend more time pushing the data through.

    --
    -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  24. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2

    Beg your pardon, I misunderstood your needs.

    --

  25. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2

    I am using SMB but not in conjunction with an iPod. I haven't tried dropping a folder of music files onto the iPod from an SMB-accessed share.

    In all other respects, SMB is working great for me, but this is one I'll have to try. Sorry to hear it isn't successful for you-- I'm going to see if I can't replicate the problem, myself.

    --

  26. They've made 4GB mini-disks in the labs.. by willy_me · · Score: 2
    I believe the point the poster was trying to make is that while mini-disks are currently at 160MB, they have newer disks in R&D. A year ago I read an article on /. about Sharp pushing the size up to 4GB - most likely using multi-layer blue laser technology. While 4GB will certainly not make it out until blue lasers are very common, a smaller 700MB or possibly even 1GB disk is technically viable.

    Think of it this way, minidisks are actually very old - over ten years since their introduction. It's very possible to apply recent technologies, similar to what is now common in DVD players, to increase their capacity. Such a disk would make minidisks very competitive with the iPod and such.

    Willy

  27. A subtle point by xiphmont · · Score: 2

    The HipZip, unfortunately, never officially supported Ogg and the firmware for HipZip that plays oggs only handles up to beta 4 files. It may well never be updated at this point due to an unfortunate pissing match involving the company that supplied the firmware for HipZip (iObjects/Fullplay).

    So, yes, it can certainly be argued HipZip was first. HipZip certainly proved that an embedded processor had the necessary power (the early beta files were even more expensive to decode than current Vorbis files). However, Iomega never officially acknowledged Ogg support.

    In terms of official company support, theKompany/Zaurus are definately the first handheld, and the first handheld to play all current/future OggVorbis I files.

    Monty

  28. Re:first Ogg? I think not by mcspock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    where did you get this beta firmware? it was never released outside of a controlled audience. monty and jack (jack works on the vorbis project) were allowed to have a copy; iomega granted permission for both of them to have a copy of the firmware, but no rights were given to redistribute it. this was primarily an advocacy item.

    i built and burned the images with vorbis support as part of this arrangement. there were also demo players furnished to iomega, and for a while they were discussing releasing a tested approved firmware update with vorbis support, but that fell through.

    so i'll ask again, where did you get that firmware image from?

    --
    -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  29. "Free Software". by castlan · · Score: 2

    It seems fairly evident that the phrase "open standards" has nothing to do with money, but with "trade secrets" and proprietary formats that a company can legally prevent others from using.

    While the words free software can mean software that can be had for no money, making it "free of cost", the phrase "free software" usually refers to Free Software. Free Software can be a free download, or it can cost money to buy it. The point of Free Software, is that once you have it, you can do just about anything you want with it, even share it with your friends. A Copyleft like the General Public License (GPL) is a kind of Copyright, which ensures that everybody you give the software to has the same freedoms that were given to you. Even if all of Ogg were totally under the GPL, they could still try to sell the software for money, just like you can, one you have a copy.

    There is no reason why you can't make money off of Free Software or open standards. For more information on Free software, check out http://www.gnu.org/philosophy

    1. Re:"Free Software". by sydb · · Score: 2

      If you're talking to me, you're preaching to the converted.

      It appears that Xiph have made the integerised codec proprietary.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:"Free Software". by castlan · · Score: 2

      Wasn't so much advocating as trying to clarify things. Surely didn't mean to preach to the choir. Do you mean that they closed the standard, or that they didn't release a Free reference implementation?

      If you understand that one can be charged for Free Software, than could you explain what you meant by this post? Maybe my preaching should have been posted to the AC's "Think again", but then your post seems like a non-sequiter. Am I missing something?

    3. Re:"Free Software". by sydb · · Score: 2

      Well, I haven't seen the license for the integerised codec. But Xiph want to charge for it. Yes you can do that with Free Software.

      But no, it doesn't make business sense. It just takes one person to pay for it then put the code up for free on their FTP server, and no-one else is going to pay.

      So I concluded that Xiph weren't going to be that daft, and that they were releasing the code under a non-free license.

      Yes I'm jumping to a conclusion, but it's a higly probable one.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  30. Tp5 by jarodss · · Score: 2

    Dave@mediafour said in the mediafour.com/fourms that there would be an anouncement monday (04/15) about xPlay.

    It may be a final release or it may be TP6, I've been a user since TP3 and have had access to my iPod since then, xPlay just keeps getting better, so when xPlay 1.0 or TP6 comes out it should be even better.

    You can even update the firmware with xPlay now, what more could you want?

  31. Re:the best ? by Jonathan · · Score: 2

    Try out ephPod -- in its latest version, it surpasses Xplay easily -- you can even get headlines synced to your iPod.