Slashdot Mirror


California + Oracle = $95 Million Fiasco

bahtama writes: "The Sacramento Bee is reporting that California apparently signed an agreement to purchase 95 million dollars worth of Oracle software that they really didn't need and that will not save them as much money as promised. They apparently purchased 270,000 licenses, which is more than all the state workers, including prison guards and others who would never need it." How do you think Oracle would treat the whole country?

43 of 513 comments (clear)

  1. Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    No way. When did this start?

    1. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by zapfie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you saying we should just be complacent about it? Yeah, it happens all the time, but that doesn't mean we should get used to it.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    2. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And it will keep happening as long as you give them your money. The only way to stop it is to severely curtail the amount of money that your government has to work with.

    3. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Anyone in California knows that Davis is a master fundraiser - he probably spends more time raising campaign money than he does governing the state.

      Does anyone know how much Gov. Davis got in campaign contributions from Larry Ellison and/or Oracle employees?

      Then again, given Gov. Davis's views on whose money it is, the $95M in wasted funds doesn't surprise me even if Oracle isn't a big campaign donor.

    4. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And then don't complain when your civil services go to hell (police response, road conditions, school quality)

      Don't get me wrong, these aren't perfect now, but all reducing the money does is choke off the wrong parts of government.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    5. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Arandir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And then don't complain when your civil services go to hell (police response, road conditions, school quality)

      Are you saying the only way to have enough adequate funding for police is to have so much spare cash that Davis will mispend it on Oracle licenses?

      I say tax the people only enough to support the essential services, and force Davis to pay for his own team of lawyers.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    6. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I say tax the people only enough to support the essential services,
      And I'm saying cutting the money won't ensure that. JUST Cut the money and the GOOD parts of the government are going to suffer as much or more as the BAD parts of government.
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    7. Re:Governments misspend taxpayer's money? by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > How did this parent post get mod'd up?

      Actually, I agree with you that my post up there probably wasn't worthy of a 4. A 3, tops. I don't generally follow campaign finance - which is why I asked if there was a connection between any Ellison-funded PACs and the Davis campaign. I figured someone would point me in the right direction - thanks for finding the info. As you point out, Oracle/Ellison doesn't show up in the top 25.)

      As for bias, sure, I'm biased. I believe that Davis views his time as Governor of California as nothing more than a fundraising venue for an upcoming Presidential bid. I believe that's wrong from the point of view of providing sound management to Californians.

      I further believe that when a politician starts to blather about how "the rich" aren't paying "their fair share", that they're looking to jack up taxes on the middle class to spend on their own pet projects.

      In 1999 we reached at the point, federally, where the bottom 50% of the income curve pays 4% of the taxes, yet can outvote the top 50% of the income curve footing the other 96% of the bill. I believe that to be a recipe for long-term disaster for prudent fiscal policy - regardless of the party in power.

      Finally, I believe that Davis' track record of mismanagement (MTBE will save the environment, bring it in! No, MTBE is bad, take it out! Each time, gouging oil companies for campaign funds with threatened legislation. Big power companies are gouging you! Let's sign long-term contracts that'll bankrupt us! No, that'll bankrupt them! No, let's bail 'em out!) speaks for itself.

      I admire and respect Davis' skills as a master fundraiser and shrewd politician. His attacks on Riordan in the Republican primaries have given him a much easier opponent, as he can characterize Simon as "a millionaire", which rings very strongly as "an evil person" with his voting base. I don't for an instant think Simon has a hope in hell of unseating him.

      (Of course, I don't think Riordan would have won either. At least the Davis/Simon matchup will be fun to watch this fall. A Davis/Riordan battle would have put me to sleep. So I'm actually looking forward to the this fall, as the campaign promises to be a great old-fashioned slugfest of ideas. I'm stocking up on popcorn and potato chips as I speak :-)

  2. So? by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    California did sign the agreement. Oracle expects them to abide by the contract. California should have thought a bit more before signing, perhaps, but there is no wrongdoing here. If they signed a contract to purchase 270,000 useless copies of Red Hat, no one would be complaining.

    1. Re:So? by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they signed a contract to purchase 270,000 useless copies of Red Hat, no one would be complaining.

      That's right, they wouldn't be complaining, because how much would 270,000 installs of RedHat cost? $89.95, that's how much.

    2. Re:So? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      California did sign the agreement. Oracle expects them to abide by the contract.

      The situation is not exactly clear yet, but the article leads me to believe that the state will claim that Oracle and this Logicon company thinger may have misrepresented themselves during the contract negotiation process. Misrepresentation is definitely something that can cause contract to get nullified:

      "The disparity "raises the question that Logicon may have misled the state," the audit says. "The fact that Logicon appears to benefit by as much as $28.5 million from its role ... makes these disparities even more troubling."

      We shall see what happens in court.

    3. Re:So? by FattMattP · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's right, they wouldn't be complaining, because how much would 270,000 installs of RedHat cost? $89.95, that's how much.
      Wrong. The original poster said "to purchase 270,000" copies of Red Hat. Red Hat Linux 7.2 costs $59.95 on their online store. That's $16,186,500 to purchase 270,000 copies. Of course, they could use just one copy, but that's not what the poster was talking about.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  3. State ID cards by Mad+Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe everybody issued a national ID card, or scanned by facial recognition technology, will require a license from Oracle before they can be tracked?

  4. Larry was just doing his patriotic duty by gambit3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... to make up for all those millions and millions the BSA claims are lost to piracy. He was just buying licenses for them.

    1. Re:Larry was just doing his patriotic duty by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Poor Oracle. They have to lower thsemselves to stuff like this, because of all those warez kiddies running Oracle 9i Enterprise on their 64 cpu Sun boxen.

  5. i see this as a possible scenario... by Atilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if you get pulled over in california:

    "May I see your driver's license, proof of insurance, and your Oracle seat license please"

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  6. Does anybody remember that Futurama... by jeremy+f · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..Where Amy went car shopping at that "Malfunctioning Eddies" or wherever; and upon being sold a car (after haggling for it at a HIGHER price), the owner-robot exploded?

    Why do I get the impression that there's quite a few Oracle employees who just exploded; and that California is going to be mightily pissed when they find that their new Oracle Software isn't going to come with quite as much Eagle as the salesmen promised...

  7. Oracle cheating? not quite... by japhmi · · Score: 5, Informative

    If the poster would actually read the article, they'd see that the company Logicon sold the Oracle software to the state, not Oracle themselves.

    --
    "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Oracle cheating? not quite... by hal200 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Perhaps you should have kept reading...and I block quoth (emphasis mine):

      In a written statement attached to the audit, Gage wrote, "In hindsight, it may have been more prudent to delay execution of the agreement" until the savings claims could be evaluated.

      A lawyer for the Department of General Services, meanwhile, was given only a few hours to review the contract.

      The breakneck timeline was imposed by Oracle, the audit says.

      "There was obviously a crushing need to hurry to get this thing done" to boost Oracle's reported earnings at the end of its fiscal year, Bowen said. "The state shouldn't be in the business of propping up any company's balance sheet, period."

      I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss Oracle's involvement in this particular clusterfuck...If they hadn't been so intent on proping up their 4th quarter numbers, the contract would most likely have gotten the review, and probably the subsequent shrieking gales of laughter it deserved.

      Of course, a large helping of shame goes to the Gov't of Calif for letting Oracle/Logicon railroad them like that. This is the sort of thing 'due process' is meant to avoid.

      --

      I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

  8. Blame Oracle? by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you read the article, it wasn't Oracle who should be blamed for this. It was the sales people from Logicon Inc who scammed them.

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:Blame Oracle? by patmfitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And of the $28 million that Logicon scammed, how much of that went to a kickback for the people who signed the contract?

  9. Let me get this straight... by smack_attack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're in a recession and companies are STILL laying people off, yet California has the gall to blow $95M on too many licenses and software they don't need?

    Sadly, fiscal responsibility in the government still seems to be generations away. If I still lived in Cali I'd try and get a proposition on the ballot that new expenditures over $(n)M have to be approved by the voter. Ditto for raises for elected officials, we should be able to fire these idiots as easily as we elect them.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by dmccarty · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is getting off-topic, but let me reply...

      I don't see how moving the democratic process back into the hands of THE PEOPLE could be considered mob rule!

      The democratic process in this country doesn't entitle the populace to make every major decision. Rather, it allows you to pick your leader, who will then make those decision for an appointed period of time. If you don't like those decisions, either don't vote for him in the first place or don't vote to re-elect him.

      If major decisions were made by the majority of the United States we probably would've nuked several Arab countries shortly after Sept. 11 and immediately sent in ground troops, then pulled them back as soon as someone died, effectively accomplishing nothing. If major decisions were made by a simple majority what would stop 51% of Serbs from killing 49% of Croats?

      That doesn't sound democratic to me.

      A pure democracy is a dangerous thing. The US isn't a democracy, it's a republic. Two quotes come to mind:
      "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner." --Anon
      "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" --Winston Churchill

      Mr. Talking head in a suit making $250K/yr does NOT represent the majority.

      Then why does the majority elect him? If you feel that you better represent the majority of voters then you should run for office and logically win! If not, get behind the candidate who most closely represents your views and vote for him or her. But instead of lamenting about the problems, use our democratic process for its advantages!

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  10. Golden opportunity for the Golden state by nakhla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I'd really like to see happen is California take some initiative and put this software to good use! Yes, they've got WAY more licenses than they need. But, that's based on their CURRENT need. California has the chance now to do some really big things with information management.

    My dad works for the State of Maryland. I can't even imagine how many millions (billions?) of dollars MD could save if they just restructured the way they maintain information. Welfare records are still being maintained using PAPER spreadsheets. Auditing this information takes months. The savings in this area alone could justify such a purchase. Auditing time could be cut drastically. Code could be written to locate discrepancies in the data. This doesn't even take into account things like payroll systems which could be automated. Doing that would allow the state to eliminate the positions of the hundreds of people with little-to-no education they have working in their payroll department.

    Bill Gates (love him or hate him) really hit the nail on the head in his book Business @ The Speed of Thought. It really outlines how technology can be used to increase the flow of information, while at the same time reducing the cost associated with acting on that information.

    Maybe someone in the California government will take charge and turn this bad situation into a golden opportunity!

    1. Re:Golden opportunity for the Golden state by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > [MD state .gov does all its stuff on paper.] Auditing this information takes months. The savings in this area alone could justify such a purchase. Auditing time could be cut drastically. Code could be written to locate discrepancies in the data. This doesn't even take into account things like payroll systems which could be automated. Doing that would allow the state to eliminate the positions of the hundreds of people with little-to-no education they have working in their payroll department.
      >
      > Bill Gates (love him or hate him) really hit the nail on the head in his book Business @ The Speed of Thought. It really outlines how technology can be used to increase the flow of information, while at the same time reducing the cost associated with acting on that information.
      >
      >Maybe someone in the California government will take charge and turn this bad situation into a golden opportunity!

      Why would they do that?

      If a private sector employer did all its work on paper, having to hire thousands of unskilled workers and pay them benefits, it would have to raise prices (making competing products cheaper, driving its own customers away), or go bankrupt due to the higher expenses.

      The government can't go bankrupt -- nor can its customers purchase their services from a competing government. It's a monpoly - not in the Gatesian sense, but in the guys-with-guns sense. You can always dump Windows for Linux, but try explaining that "Joe's Auto Licensing Inc" does a better job than your state DMV the next time you get pulled over and asked to show your driver's license!

      The more folks a department in .gov hires, the more important the people who run that department become. The department's inefficient, slow, and costs too much to run? No problem! That just means we need more money! Who cares about the costs, we can always raise taxes, the taxpayer's good for the money.

      And besides, what are the taxpayers gonna do, buy their schools, roads, and police and fire departments from someone else? That's illegal! (Whew, good thing we make the laws that control that part, or we'd be fucked! OK, you can buy your schools from someone else if you really wanna, but you still gotta pay for ours :-)

      And the other stuff .govs do? Taxpayers buying their diversity training programs and social security and sensitivity classes and unemployment insurance and welfare from someone else? Hey, most people wouldn't buy those things at all. (Gee, also a good thing we can pass laws to make buying those things from us mandatory! :-)

      Governments will modernize and eliminate waste when they have an incentive to eliminate that waste. The only incentive that's been shown to motivate such cost reductions is the profit incentive. (Kinda a tautology, no? Only people who care about making money care about not spending it.) The government - by defintion - has no profit incentive. The private sector - again by definition - is all about profit incentive.

      So no, nobody in any government will "see this as a golden opportunity", because it's not an opportunity, because doing business at the speed of anything faster than a sloth on valium isn't what governments are about.

    2. Re:Golden opportunity for the Golden state by krmt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this depends on what you're looking at. Sure, when typing up a simple memo, this can take a lot more work, depending on what the person producing it wants or needs. However, take a look at the other side. Simple, or even very complex, documents can be created with relative ease thanks to modern tools. I'm not just talking about Word, but TeX, PowerPoint, Arcview, Excel, and the whole host of other programs. The types of documents made by these programs are generally more complex, and time is saved overall in making them. If it takes the same amount of time to create the thing, then often more work is put in to the content itself or the appearance. Granted, they are often overkill for something simple, but the options are there to manage complexity.

      It is, by the way, complexity that the parent post is talking about. Being able to increase the flow of information by putting information in a figure as well as text, or automatically generating a reference in LyX, or adding an easy scatter plot for your data with Excel. You simply can't do these things with a typewriter. Modern technology allows us to stream more information at people than ever before, and while this does have its obvious and many downsides, I don't think that the fact can be ignored.

      And while you're right about the increased work hours, I don't feel that you can blame technology for it. After all, if we really wanted to work less, we would. But we don't, and we can't. The overall psyche of the nation is tooled in such a way that we have to work 60, 70, and 80 hour workweeks on average, no matter the consequences. This isn't because of technology, it's the modern mindset that is the cause of this, which runs far deeper.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    3. Re:Golden opportunity for the Golden state by G-funk · · Score: 4, Informative

      PosgreSQL can do anything Oracle can

      Ah. Everytime I hear "X can do everything Oracle can" it makes me smile.

      You know why oracle charges so much money? You know why oracle's the second biggest software company? Sure it's partly marketing, but mainly Oracle markets itself. Oracle is the most powerful, scalable, and generally rock-steady-makes-toast-cuts-potatoes-in-3-styles database in the world by a long shot bar none.

      Comparing postgressql to oracle is like comparing the JET engine and a .mdb file to SQL Server 2000. It's a joke and makes you look like an idiot to people who know anything about databases.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  11. Attention California by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 5, Funny

    For Sale
    Fully licensed copies of Linux. Guaranteed uptime. The next generation of operating systems. Normally priced at $4k, yours today for the low low price of $2k per copy. Hurry and order now, supplies are limited. Order within the next 10 minutes and get a free mousepad with your order.
    CALL NOW!

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
  12. Moot Point by plinko_chip · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of this is meaningless, since within a years time California won't have any electricity!

  13. What's ironic here... by s390 · · Score: 3, Informative

    is that the CA Dept. of Information Technology (DoIT) that committed this colossal blunder was established just a few years ago precisedly to eliminate IT mismanagement and waste in State Agencies. I'm surprised Cortez (DoIT Director) still has a job, but that might not be true much longer. The legislature is considering abolishing the DoIT.

  14. Re:Oh come on, honestly... by dewke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, there is no difference.

    Oracle and California signed a contract, California was really REALLY stupid. I seriously doubt that Larry Ellison made California "an offer they couldn't refuse". Oracle is sure as hell not going to refuse the deal. They are a for profit company that sells software...

    It is not the companies responsibility to police its customers. If someone comes to my company and offers us 3x what we normally charge for our services we will happily take the extra cash, so will every other company on the planet.

    Caveat emptor...

    dewke

    --
    Oderint dum metuant
  15. Re:I live in California by Darth+Maul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's funny the mindset the gov't has gotten us into. If we get a refund, we think we're getting money from the gov't. If we have to pay, we think it's so unfair we're having to pay the gov't.

    Fact of the matter is, you pay both ways. Just in the former case you overpaid (free loan to the gov't), and in the latter case you didn't pay enough (not a free loan though, you may get penalized).

    Automatic payroll deduction is one of the nastiest tricks the over-sized government has pulled on us! If we actually had to write out checks each year for the full amount we're *actually* paying, the government realizes there would be a tax revolt that very year. But take out a little each check, and no problem.

    What's that example with the frog? ;-)

    --
    --- witty signature
  16. What is sad... by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I realize that you were joking, but what is sad is that most businessmen actually do put a high value on such unethical behaviour.

  17. Meanwhile....!!!! by mikosullivan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... City of Largo, FL obtains more Linux licenses than it needs!!!! Mistake costs them.... um, nothing.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  18. Oh really? by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He added, "This is a mess. And it's not one we need to sweep under the rug."

    And what kinds of messes DO we sweep under the rug?

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  19. California's Wasting a Lot of Money These Days by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First the government signs on for decade-long fixed price energy prices at the height of the energy shortage (And are whining about it now that prices are a tenth what they locked in at) and now this.

    I'd be pretty pisssed off if I lived in the state...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  20. And in offtopic news by t0qer · · Score: 3

    My wife works for an arm of the .gov. She told me M$ has been auditing the .gov for license compliance on every level as a form of retaliation against the recent trials.

    It's sort of a funny paradox, now the .gov is wanting to say buh bye M$, but the problem is a logistical one, how do you move and train all those employee's who were brought up on M$ over to *nix.

    Just a side note to the story I wanted to add, allmost ontopic.

  21. Re:at least the government waste by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    > Oracle pays very little in taxes, thanks to our wonderful loop-hole ridden tax system.

    Bullshit.

    1Q01: $903M income before tax, $320M income tax expense.
    2Q01: $1.32B income before tax, $470M income tax expense.
    3Q01: $785M income before tax, $275M income tax expense.
    4Q01: $845M income before tax, $295M income tax expense.

    Your political bias is showing. (OK, so's mine. Guilty as charged. ;-) But corporations pay assloads of tax too.

  22. Re:I live in California by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we actually had to write out checks each year for the full amount we're *actually* paying, the government realizes there would be a tax revolt that very year. But take out a little each check, and no problem.

    When you fill out your 1040, it's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS how much you've paid.

    For example, an MD friend of mine paid over 100,000 US Dollars in federal income taxes this year. Plus about $30,000 in property taxes, state and local income taxes.

    I don't know much about his spending habits, but let's say he put $20,000 in the bank, and spent his remaining $150,000 on taxable goods and services. That means he also paid $10,500 in sales tax in his county. (In this case, he has no car or mortgage payments.)

    So at the end of the year, he's paid almost a full half of his income to "the government." That is not American, my friends, that sounds like something the damn socialist frenchies and poppycockers overseas would do. (I love you guys, but your taxes suck even worse than ours. But not much.)

    So when my wife's co-workers quit their jobs to raise babies (five of them in the past 18 months) and get public assistance in medical benefits, food, income, subsidized housing, etc... they tell us "The Government is taking care of me! It is great!" (My sister has also done this, twice.)

    Bullshit. My father and I are paying for you to sit on your ass and watch Oprah and smoke Menthol Lights next to your newborn. And to get medical care. And to buy orange juice with food stamps so you can save your baby shower money for important stuff... like another carton of Menthols. These idiots think the government just "makes" the money... the clue train never bothers making a stop between their ears.

    Sorry to be such a 20-something curmudgeon. Obviously not all people on public assistance are like this; just most of them. Get knocked up by your cousin's boyfriend and skate it out from there. No marriage, no commitment, no work, no worries. And they are OK with it, because the government is taking care of them. And you and I are paying for it. Yes we need social services, but we have bred an entire generation or subculture of people who can now live by the hard work of others who make btter decisions and handle the consequences to their actions without whining.

    If you're in the US, and haven't had the pleasure of dealing with people like this yet, take a couple trips to WalMart at 2:00pm and see if you can apply this tale to the runny-nosed crotch-fruit being dragged around by some "poor, bedraggled" mommy. She has a vacant look on her face, you know why? She doesn't have to care anymore. About anything.

    Except how to afford that next box of Menthols.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  23. They should have talked to me first. by dinotrac · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd have been happy to set them up with PostgreSQL for $45 million.

    Oh, what the heck. I'm bigger than that.

    Guys --- if you manage to get yourself out of that Oracle boondoggle, I'll still be glad to get you PostgreSQL for $45 million.

    I am such an old softie.

  24. Re:I live in California by electroniceric · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You poor suffering peasant. I hate to fight flame with flame, but y'all are in the wrong industry to be complaining about government handouts, and I'm in too crappy a mood to listen to puerile nerds complain about how hard it is for them when they have to pay some taxes for the plush infrastructure that lets them run servers in the houses on dirt-cheap gummint electricity. (Of course if you pointed out that a self-righteous answer to an ignorant self-righteous rant is somehwere self-defeating, I'd be obliged to concede the wisdom of this, but a little reply-ranting feels good, as we well know here. On with the show).

    It's time for some Q&A.Let's start with familiar /. lore.
    Q. Who invented the Internet?
    A. The US federal gummint (DARPA)
    Q. On whose dime?
    A. The US taxpayers'
    Q. What industry occupies the largest portion of the US federal government's trillions of dollars in expenditures?
    A. Defense. 35% in 2001. Welfare and other means-tested entitlments were 6%.
    Q. What has the US Dept. of Defense been focusing on since the end of the Cold War? A. Technology - computerized planes, satellites, drones, tanks, etc. Read any Afghanistan story in the Washington Post or New York Times, or any other major newspaper, and you will hear nothing but raves about our high-tech military.
    Q. And who does that money employ?
    A. Engineers, technologists, programmers.
    Q. What do they make on average?
    A. A starting salary of $60K, if not more

    Q. Wow, Eric, sounds like the geeks get the most welfare of all! Why do you think they complain so much?
    A. (stumped)

    And don't even dare to complain how hard it is to figure out what the government spends - it took me 6 seconds to find the US budget. Whew!

  25. Re:I live in California by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it certainly looked informative. I found the numbers a bit interesting and followed your link. On page 379 (Table S-3, Budge Summary) of the FY 2001 Budget document from your gpo.gov link I found the following:

    (2001 Estimates)
    Discretionary: $634
    DoD $279
    non-DoD $355

    Mandatory: $993
    Social Security: $355
    Medicare and medicaid: $342
    Means-tested entitlements: $111
    Other: $123

    Total: $1,835
    (All number in Billions)

    So we've got 15% for DoD (355/1835)
    and 6% for means-tested (111/1835). So you got half of it right but distorted the other half. Non-DoD and Social Security were more than DoD and Medicare/Medicaid was almost as much.

    So, it's an interesting chain you've strung but it doesn't hold together.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  26. Re:at least the government waste by ckimyt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1Q01: $903M income before tax, $320M income tax expense.
    2Q01: $1.32B income before tax, $470M income tax expense.
    3Q01: $785M income before tax, $275M income tax expense.
    4Q01: $845M income before tax, $295M income tax expense.

    Your political bias is showing. (OK, so's mine. Guilty as charged. ;-) But corporations pay assloads of tax too.

    Um, Bullshit on you. Look at gross proceeds:

    4Q01: 2.357 BILLION
    3Q01: 2.242 BILLION
    2Q01: 3.263 BILLION
    1Q01: 2.674 BILLION

    That's an average tax rate of 12.9% on gross income.

    When's the last time anyone who isn't on WIC paid only 12.9% federal tax on their gross income after deductions?

    --

    Putting the sig back into +1, Insightful since 1995!