Slashdot Mirror


SuSE 8.0 Now Shipping

MobyTurbo writes "Well, it's technically a day late, but SuSE Linux 8.0 is now shipping. The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM), an improved firewall, among other packages that have been upgraded or added. (Including a couple of new games. :-) )"

83 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Eeezzzzy by Lappie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still very impressed with the automaticity of the installation of my 7.3. Almost everything worked out of the box, without one glitch. I'm certain I'll be the first to buy me the 8.0 box when it's in de shops here in Europe.

  2. First distro? by ciryon · · Score: 2

    This must be the first distro shipping KDE3, or am I mistaken?

  3. RedHat by BlueTooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, unlike RedHat, they have a legitimate reason for a major version increment?

    --
    SPAM
    1. Re:RedHat by software_non_olet · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they simply had to follow the market leader in their version numbering.

      Small changes - and I don't see a KDE 3.0 as such a BiG change to justify a major version increment for the whole distro.

      Appearantly, they focused their efforts lately on 8.0 polishing, hence I feel it's better than 7.3. After all, the new kernel is worth the upgrade for my taste (that is if you don't go for Red Hat).

      KDE 3.0 is as stable as the old version (ahem). And the installation speed is said to have improved (according to SuSE's advertisments). The latter I don't know much about, because I had to go for a coffee, and a snack and make some telefon calls until the installer gave me the obligatory error messages about some packages which I had to reinstall later by hand etc. (I mean after having tried the whole game 3 times in vain, with deinstalling and reinstalling via the cludgy YAST installer.

      I should've stayed with Red Hat, but that could as well be my illusion, that the grass on the other side of my reality-fence is allways greener.

      After one month (and 4 servers) experience I'd say:

      You can use it, but you mustn't. If you allready have a SuSE, it's OK to upgrade. Especially if your servers are in Europe, the support for local ISDN and DSL services and hardware is probably (or should I say slightly) better than from US distros.

      Acceptable.

    2. Re:RedHat by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      SuSE has typically adhered to a "quarterly" release format, which means 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and then 7.0. It's been pretty regular the past few releases, except for 8.0 which has been a bit long in coming.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  4. Reviews... by Iberian · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6015 If you are looking for a review before you just go out and buy software based on free code. Any readers actually have the product yet. Impressions....

    1. Re:Reviews... by d3xt3r · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have been running SuSE since 7.0 and have purchased 7.1-7.3 and each release has brought more features and better integration to an already great distro. I don't have 8.0 yet, but when it arrives, I can almost guarantee that I'll be happy with it. =)

      Like Red Hat, SuSE releases their own patched version of the Linux kernel which have always been extremely fast and reliable (in my experience) and their installation is easy. The other nice thing is the setup tool, Yast2, it's the best integrated setup/control center tool I've seen yet.

      The nice thing about SuSE is that everything just works. SuSE offers upgrades to KDE and GNOME that can be downloaded and installed automatically with Yast Online Update on the same day that KDE and GNOME annouce their new releases. They are definitely on top of things. Also, Yast can be used to configure just about every aspect of the system, no need whatsoever to edit config files.

      Another nice thing about SuSE is that it's Oracle certified. SuSE offers a nice rpm that sets the system up for installing and running Oracle, making installation as simple as on Windows (at least for 9i).

      I've tried Red Hat, Mandrake, SuSE and debian and I am happiest by far with SuSE. It has easier config tools than Mandrake, the speed and reliability of Red Hat, and the advantage that it is commercially supported by many companies, meaning that if a product claims it will run on linux, it WILL run on SuSE Linux. :-)

    2. Re:Reviews... by wishus · · Score: 2

      I have been running SuSE since 7.0 and have purchased 7.1-7.3

      Do you upgrade your existing system (with the upgrade option) or back up your data and install fresh every time?

      I am curious, because the last time I tried someone's "update" feature to upgrade my system (1997, Redhat 4.0) it made a mess. Since then, I have been backing up and installing fresh every time.

      I currently run SuSE 7.2 and would like to move to 8.0 - so my question is, have you found SuSE's update to be clean, or should I continue to back up and install fresh?

  5. Sun's Grid Engine comes with SuSE 8.0 by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sun's Grid Engine is included in SuSE 8.0... I think that's a significant addition, as grid computing becomes the "hot" topic amongst CS researchers nowadays. Good to see Linux on the cutting edge.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  6. Get the Whole Load by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    I'm running SuSE 7.3 and have bought their distros since 6.1.

    I really like the way that SuSE comes with so many applications that you can install. With large disks, there's little reason to be without any of the many open source applications out there.

    Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Get the Whole Load by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      That sounds like an outdated currency to me, kind of like shillings, farthings, and halfpennies!

      Living in the US, saddled as we are with the onerous legacy of what used to be the British system of measurements (miles, feet, gallons, pints, pounds, furlongs per fortnight, other nondecimal abominations), I think it is only fitting and fair that the UK be dragged kicking and screaming into using the new &euro and giving up the dear £.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    2. Re:Get the Whole Load by grahamm · · Score: 2

      Why not let the default paper size depend on the locale? That way you would get Letter with en_US and A4 with en_GB etc.

    3. Re:Get the Whole Load by mpe · · Score: 2

      Living in the US, saddled as we are with the onerous legacy of what used to be the British system of measurements (miles, feet, gallons, pints, pounds, furlongs per fortnight, other nondecimal abominations),

      You do realise that what are called "English" measurments in the US are actually somewhat unique to the US? Some of them, such as the inch (25.4 mm) are actually defined in terms of metric measurments. Until 60 years ago the English (US) and Imperial (used in the British empire and later commonwealth) were actually different. Measuments of volume are different between the two systems.

    4. Re:Get the Whole Load by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.

      Metric paper is used in most of the world. There is also a simple mathematical relationship with A size paper, especially useful if you want to directly print booklets or to resize to a different paper size.
      There is an "en_US" locale, does that have something like "US_Letter" as the default paper size?

  7. SuSE 8.0 by noodlez84 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anyone interested should view the SuSE Linux 8.0 page.

    • Reasons to Use SuSE Linux
    • Choose from among XFS, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, and others during install
    • choose to encrypt your filesystem
    • free security updates, unlike RedHat
    • improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities, let's you configure everything from a DHCP server to CUPS
    • YaST Online Update, for automatic upgrading of your RPMs
    • conformance to the LSB, the only compliant distro so far
    • the most secure distro, according to LWN.net research
    • Personal Firewall configuration through YaST
    • 90 days of tech support through email or telephone with the Professional version
    1. Re:SuSE 8.0 by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

      # free security updates, unlike RedHat

      gee, I better uninstall those Redhat security updates, apparently they're not aware that they were supposed to be charging me for them. Thanks for spreading misinformation.

    2. Re:SuSE 8.0 by agi · · Score: 2, Informative

      > free security updates, unlike RedHat

      AFAIK all Linux distros offer free security updates. And even not security related updates. Including RedHat.

      --
      EOF
    3. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Matts · · Score: 2

      Conectiva 8.0 (in beta now) is also LSB compliant, fwiw.

      I'm really looking forward to when Red Hat finally moves to LSB compliance. Maybe then we'll be able to take almost any RPM, be it Red Hat, SuSE or Conectiva, and install it on any linux distribution without worrying too much about wierd issues.

      --

      Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    4. Re:SuSE 8.0 by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reasons for using it over any other major linux distro:

      # Choose from among XFS, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, and others during install

      Nope, Mandrake's the same.

      # choose to encrypt your filesystem

      Mmm, same.

      # free security updates, unlike RedHat

      Wrong.

      # improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities, let's you configure everything from a DHCP server to CUPS

      Just what we need, and also covered (badly) by webmin/linuxconf on other distros.

      # YaST Online Update, for automatic upgrading of your RPMs

      Same as mandrake.

      I've yet to see anything major to swing me. I'm far too used to the old tools (chkconfig, ifconfig) and the like that it doesn't make much difference which distro I use, linux or otherwise. That's one of the main reasons I'm against pushing things like YaST2 too hard, or people will simply turn linux into open source M$.

      jh

      --

      jh

    5. Re:SuSE 8.0 by chess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most interesting thing is that they broke up /etc/rc.config. AFAIR the comment in the file it should resemble the Red Hat way now...

      chess

    6. Re:SuSE 8.0 by bcjanes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Red Hat updates are free. It's called up2date, and the registration through Red Hat Network costs nothing for a single user.

      And it's not just the updates, you can install new packages through up2date. Up2date will download and install the necessary dependancies automatically as well, again at no cost for a single user.

      --
      Linux is unix training wheels, while BSD *is* unix.
    7. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 4, Informative



      >As a result, the users are now forced to use YaST 2,
      >which depends on Qt.

      NOT TRUE. yast2 has several frontends, you can use it with a curses interface.

      Also, why anyone would use SuSE and be opposed to QT libs is indeed quite strange. No rational decision obviously.

      --
      Moritz
    8. Re:SuSE 8.0 by inquis · · Score: 2

      It's possible to run YaST2 from the console in text mode, that's why the dumped the original YaST.

    9. Re:SuSE 8.0 by Raphael · · Score: 2
      NOT TRUE. yast2 has several frontends, you can use it with a curses interface.

      Yes, I know. This was already the case with SuSE 7.3. But in 7.3, several YaST2 packages (modules) had a depency on Qt, so installing YaST2 also meant that I would have been forced to install Qt, which is something that I wanted to avoid. Maybe this dependency has been removed in 8.0, so that I can still install my system without the Qt libraries. I have the SuSE 8.0 CDs and DVD now, so I will check that soon.

      Also, why anyone would use SuSE and be opposed to QT libs is indeed quite strange. No rational decision obviously.

      As I wrote in my previous comment, this is a personal choice. But there are some rational reasons for that: some of the machines on which I run Linux are rather old and have a rather slow CPU and not much disk space. Avoiding Qt makes sense on these machines. Also, some machines are used for cross-platform application development. Avoiding the installation of Qt is the best way to ensure that nothing that we develop will have some accidental dependencies on Qt (because there are still some licensing problems when developing Qt applications for Windows).

      Even if I do not want to install the Qt libraries, there are some good reasons to use SuSE: it has a very good installation process, it comes with tons of applications pre-packaged, it has a good support for internationalization and the filesystem encryption is included in the default kernel. The last point is important for me because at work we use Linux on several laptops. If a laptop is stolen, then we loose one machine but at least we can be reasonably sure that no thief will be able to find some confidential data on the computer.

      --
      -Raphaël
    10. Re:SuSE 8.0 by mpe · · Score: 2

      I've yet to see anything major to swing me. I'm far too used to the old tools (chkconfig, ifconfig) and the like that it doesn't make much difference which distro I use, linux or otherwise.

      One point with SuSE is that you get a very large amount of software supplied as standard in the box set. Where people do not have a high bandwidth Internet connection this can be desirable.

    11. Re:SuSE 8.0 by mpe · · Score: 2

      The problem is that frequently, oft-changing tools abstracted by a *thick* (yes, you can have thin GUI frontends) GUI layer from the actual config files can be confusing to the people who really *do* know what they want to do, but have to put up with figuring out what exactly a graphical util is doing.

      Also any kind of "wizard" type interface which attempts to enable someone to perform a complex task, which they do not understand, means that when it fails that person is left completly at a loss. Such an interface (or even a set of step by step instructions) cannot possibly cover every way in which things can go wrong.)
      Combined with those who do understand what is going on having to work around silly assumptions. e.g. insisting on installing modem and ISDN utilities on a machine which only has a NIC.

  8. Re:Suse is great by hs81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SuSe has always been a bit bloated but they have made huge efforts to allow the user to select what they want to install and later on to install/upgrade new packages. I have used RedHat and SuSe for several years and if anyone asks me what distro to go for I say try SuSe bacause I have so much respect for the install process.

  9. Other cool stuff in 8.0... by lessthan0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    SuSE 8.0 also includes:

    Sun's grid engine software
    Star Office 5.2 and Open Office 641c
    Updated YaST2 and much improved YaST2 console mode
    X 4.2
    Alsa 0.9
    One of the best firewall scripts anywhere

    Fairly major changes in how admin settings are saved, with a lot of stuff moving out of /etc/rc.config and into a Red Hat-style /etc/sysconfig. It is still managed by YaST2, just stored in a different place.

    It is polished and solid, and as always, stuffed with so much software, you could not absorb it all in several years. The upside is that almost everything you might want is in there already. SuSE may not be perfect, but they contribute huge chunks of code to the kernel, KDE, Alsa, Xfree, and NIS projects and that's good for everyone.

    Some updates to KDE3 and other packages are already posted to their ftp site, so fire up the YaST Online Update right after the install to get the new goodies.

  10. x86 only? by gecko19scl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run SuSE 7.3 SPARC at the moment and its really good...is the new 8.0 release for i386 only? or do they have a sparc port on the way? i hope they dont kill it off like Red Hat did, they have done a really good job with 7.3 :-)

    chris

    .sig : bad command or file name

    1. Re:x86 only? by Mongr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The developers have already stated that they will skip the 8.0 release and release the next sparc at 8.1

      They also claim that dropping 32-bit sparc support is probable....though I certainly hope not.

      --
      -=Mongr=-
    2. Re:x86 only? by larien · · Score: 2

      Watch out with SS5's; the systems with the 170MHz CPUs have a history of being flaky with linux (they use a different architecture from the 70/110MHz models).

    3. Re:x86 only? by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      If it's of any interest, Mandrake has just released 8.2 for PPC

  11. Re:in 2 weeks... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

    I *just* bought 7.3...does SuSE offer upgrade discounts?

  12. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny


    The basic differences are:

    Suse is by fat, sausage scoffing crauts.
    Mandrake is by irritating, garlic loving frogs.
    Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.

    Take your pick.

  13. Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by joestar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They announced it yesterday - it includes StarOffice 6.0 for ProSuite & PowerPack Editions. The announce is here.

    Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

    1. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by oever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, still StarOffice 5.2.
      Source: The SuSE 8.0 Professional box on my desk.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    2. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by NuMessiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SuSe 8.0 comes with StarrOffice 5.2 :(.

      Too bad that they were unable to strike a deal like Mandrake did with Sun. SO 6.0 would be a very good addition to KDE 3.0 and stuff.

      Odd thing is that SuSe usually has a very good connections to other companies (read: SuSe Linux Database Server = IBM DB2 UDB + distro, SuSe Groupware Server = Lotus Domino + distro, SuSe Certified Oracle 9i ...).

      bb4now,
      PMC

      --
      we-go-we-fly
    3. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      Why aren't any distros including OpenOffice? In my opinion it's a vast improvement over StarOffice 5.2, and the differences between it and StarOffice 6.0 are trivial.

    4. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 2

      Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?

      According to another poster on here, it comes with StarOffice 5.2.

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    5. Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... by mr3038 · · Score: 2

      Why aren't any distros including OpenOffice?

      The three CDs freely downloadable version of Mandrake 8.2 includes OpenOffice.org office suite. Default fonts look butt-ugly though. As the downmodded anonymous coward said, it's version 641. Suite contains:

      • OpenOffice.org Writer
      • OpenOffice.org Math
      • OpenOffice.org Draw
      • OpenOffice.org Calc
      • OpenOffice.org Impress

      Equivalent parts for KOffice are included too. A MS word document I tried opened fine in OpenOffice.org Writer but didn't look quite right with KWord.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  14. First distro with KDE3? Nope. by rmstar · · Score: 2, Informative

    This must be the first distro shipping KDE3, or am I mistaken?

    If you take the word "shipping" literally, maybe.

    But I've been using KDE3 for a while on my laptop, running Gentoo 1.1, which, btw, is the best distro I've ever tried.

    rmstar

  15. Version numbers by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's amazing how fast the numbers go up in distributions compared to that of the packages within...

    Maybe companies should be forced to number their distros based on the average version number of the packages within; that'd cause an interesting non-linear numbering scheme. ;)

    jh

    --

    jh

  16. Lycoris... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Any affiliation with MS? Just wondering, cause I saw this at the bottom:

    Lycoris and Desktop/LX are Trademarks of Redmond Linux Corp. © 2001, 2002 Lycoris All Rights Reserved

    1. Re:Lycoris... by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lycoris is also designed to look and feel more like Windows XP than any other distro. The real purpose of Lycoris seems to be to provide a distro with "training wheels" for Microsoft refugees. As such, it occupies a very unique and very needed niche in Linux-land.

      I have an order in for Lycoris Desktop Developer edition, (Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!) and I will probably comment on my experiences with the distro in my column at Low End PC as soon as I get some time with it.

      I think it's hilarious that these guys are based in Redmond. I don't think that MS is quaking in their boots just yet, but if this is what the Lycoris site claims, they might have reason to in the future.

      Oh yeah, just so I correct a mistake I made about this distro in the past...it is based on Caldera, not Corel/Debian.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  17. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by larien · · Score: 2, Funny
    *laugh* however, quick speeling flame: it's usually 'krauts', not 'crauts', after sauerkraut. Yes, we name a country's residents after.. a type of cabbage.

    Still I'm not sure if that's worse or better than frogs, wops or dagoes (French, Italian and Spanish respectively, but not respectfully).

  18. Linux math. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18...among other packages that have been upgraded or added.

    7.3 + 3.0 + 2.4.18 = 8.0 ???

    Maybe some of those other packages had negative version numbers.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Linux math. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      the Binay compatability changed so they madea new release.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Linux math. by 56ker · · Score: 2

      What's Binay compatibility?

  19. Red Hat update *IS* free by salimma · · Score: 3, Informative

    Updates are available via FTP servers for free, and through their Red Hat Network channels it's free for the end user (1 free token per user account).

    So what you're paying for is to be able to manage all your computers through one interface. SuSE's YOU last time I tried it (7.3) works like Ximian's Red Carpet, or Microsoft's Windows Update, in that all the work is done on the client's side.

    Michel

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  20. Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by 4im · · Score: 5, Informative

    See subject - SuSE 8.0 has been shipping for a while, I've been seeing comments about it in german and swiss newsgroups. These comments range from rather critical to absolutely enthusiastic.

    Unfortunately, it's been "in" for a while to bash the "Windows from Nürnberg". IMHO SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.

    Can't wait to get my hands on this new version, the features list is quite impressive. I'll get around to it this weekend, probably...

    (using SuSE, Debian, RedHat, IPCop, ... on x86, UltraSparc, Alpha)

    1. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.

      Amen - I want to develop the software I get paid for or I want to play with, and I want to have my servers working rock solid without devoting myself 24/7 to them. SuSE offers a very solid base, incredibly logically laid out system, very stable releases (I'm even trusting the x,0 release here), and not only fast security updates, but software version updates for quite a bit of software, even for releases several minor version old.

      It allows me to get my work done, and provides a nice CLI, GUI and "install and ignore" server experience. Plus, if you're doing enterprise work, check out their more powerful packages (the ones that start at $1000 and move on up). They provide the packages for IBM's enterprise applications, not to mention the Linux for IBM's big iron. Simply having a team that can provide the necessary QA and support to big customers makes me feel confidant as a minor customer of theirs.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by evilviper · · Score: 2

      No, as a matter of fact it hasn't been shipping for weeks.

      There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! by 4im · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, as a matter of fact it hasn't been shipping for weeks.

      There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.

      I am aware of the betas, and _yes_ the _official_ release _has_ been out for a while. True, not everywhere at the same time, but my first notice that it was out was from a _MediaMarkt_ in Switzerland, of all places... been out _at least_ for 1 1/2 weeks. And no, it hasn't arrived yet at the place where I usually pick it up, so the distribution definitely isn't uniform around Europe.

  21. Already in shops here in .de by NuMessiah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's technically a *week* late. I had my copy of SuSe 8.0 Personal Package in the mailbox (Germany) already at Friday the 12th. (Preordered directly from SuSe.de web site).

    Just one comment: Installation went flawlessly on the Gericom Webgine 1630 Notebook. All of the hardware (expect AMR Modem) automatically recognized and initialized :).

    bb4now,
    PMC

    --
    we-go-we-fly
  22. Re:in 2 weeks... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    depending on if I can find the ISO's, I'll give it a try when I fully convert my system over from win2k.

    In the past, SuSE hasn't provided distros - you have a folder with 7 CD-Roms and a DVD. All the packages are online, however, and a ftp or "download 'em and install" is possible, however, you then say...

    I tried SuSe before, and it was really cool, but it's gonna have a hardtime beating debian as my desktop OS of choice.

    You can apt-get it. No, really. Although I don't know how much of a stub of a SuSE install you need (and I *seriously* doubt you can go from debian to SuSE without much anguish). Technically, apt-get is for upgrades, and the repository base, or whatever you call it is on ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/, and you need apt4rpm at http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/. 7.3 and 8.0 are unofficially supported, but are reputed to work find, and that's an offical SuSE mirror site as well.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  23. Re:A lot of changes... by c=sixty4 · · Score: 2
    YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use
    Is it possible in SuSE's 8.0 YAST2 to install new packages through FTP? In 7.3, you couldn't do this - YAST2 would only accept CD, NFS or a hard drive directory.
    --
    "The good die first." "Most of us are morally ambiguous, which explains our random dying patterns." --- MST3K
  24. RedHat to Suse by joe_fish · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm using RedHat 7.2 right now, but it isn't very stable - Galeon occasionally locks everything up solid. So I need a way out.

    I was hoping to wait for RH7.3, but perhaps this is a better option.

    My real question is how hard will I have to work to move accross all my configs? There's samba/printers/sendmail/etc/etc. Anyone know of a good way of doing RH->Suse without any pain?

  25. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by pubjames · · Score: 2


    Actually I regret posting this now. I have a lot of respect for the Germans and the Americans. ;-)

  26. Using it since 14 days / kernel problems by tjansen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am using it since 14 days now (live in Germany and subscribed it). It's ok, not many noticable improvements over 7.3 beside KDE 3.0. But what really annoys me is that the kernel is not very stable, at least for some activities. When trying to rip a CD my system freezes after a few minutes. I ripped several dozen CDs with 7.3 without a single problem. Another good way to crash the kernel is to listen to audio using an USB audio device. Sometimes it crashes after 5 minutes, sometimes after 60 minutes, but it will always crash. Since 7.3's had a bug that prevented USB audio from working it's still an improvement, but not a very good one. Playing Tribes 2 with the Nvidia drivers is better, it only crashes after several hours, and I had the same problems with Suse 7.3 as well, at least after the last driver update.

  27. Re:in 2 weeks... by StarTux · · Score: 2, Informative

    You'll be able to do an FTP install in about 3 weeks to 4 weeks.

    They do have an eval CD that is an ISO though.

  28. Inquiring Minds Want to Know by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When I tried SuSE a couple of years ago, the thing that seemed to set it apart was its ambitious attempt to rework system configuration. Instead of hacking the usual array of scripts and config files, the SuSE admin was supposed to set a large set of parameters contained in a single file.

    Thing is, I could never get these parameters set exactly right. It was always tempting to bypass this procedure and configure the system the old-fashioned way.

    So here's my question: does SuSE still do things this way? And if so, do people really use these parameters, or do they just blow it off and edit the scripts?

    1. Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know by fm6 · · Score: 2
      It still tries to keep most of your system configuration, including network configuration, in the one file, which you can still override if you like.
      Well, that's fine, if you're a basic download-the-iso-and-hack-away user. But if you're actually buying support from SuSE, you can't bypass the SuSE config system. Or at least you couldn't when I was a SuSE user.
  29. Came on time for most people, for others it was ea by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Recieved my copy yesterday, the 22nd. Precisely on time. Like Lord of the Rings, people in Europe have been getting theirs before the US.

    StarTux

  30. Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 by StarTux · · Score: 2

    The start variables in rc.config are no longer needed, as they now match run levels much more closely (basically they are deprecating rc.config). You will find individual scripts under /etc/sysconfig.

    Also noticed a SuSe hardware boot time hardware detection utility, similer to that of Redhat's.

    Gnome 1.4.1 is included too.

    Promise IDE Raid controllers are fully supported.

    1. Re:Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 by StarTux · · Score: 2

      Straight from the update manual:

      "The hard disk controller manufactured by Promise is currently found on high-end motherboards in numerous computer models, either as a [pure IDE controller (for UDMA 100) or as an IDE-RAID controller. As of SuSE Linux 8.0, these controllers are directly supported by the kernel and treated as a standard controller for IDE hard disks. The additonal kernel module pdcraid is reuired before you can acquire RAID functionality".

      Guess there is you answer :).

      StarTux

  31. About the Update from 7.3 to 8.0 by ksschen · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been updating my SuSE 7.3 to 8.0 10 days ago. The update changed some settings, for example it activated netsettings received by a DHCP-Server. I did not use a DHCP-Server before. But when I switched off the DHCP-Option, it showed all the previous Network-Settings - except the own local IP-Adress. Some Links in the kicker did not work anymore. Worst is that Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 does not work anymore. When trying to run it tells me, that it does not find the configuration database anymore. I had no time to fix that (to be more exact: I don't know anymore when I will have time to try to fix that, because Evolution is my PIM (-: ). During the Update I had a good feeling, because the update routine asked for every single file I expected it to ask for, because I did not install them via YAST2. The update is not reversible. Some other small things are broken, too. The KDE-Start-Menu was in german before the update and is now in English, for example. Mozilla 0.9.8 crashes very, very often and often crashes while booting, when it crashed before, till the X-Server is restarted. Before the update Mozilla 0.9.8 crashed maybe once a week. When installing the available Patches it did not find a patch (menu_fix-1) it recommended for update. But on the other side, there are no hardware problems, KDE 3 runs really fast and I feel some performance improvements. YAST2 is better than before, but I miss some features from YAST1 (which is not available anymore) or did not find them till now. I also installed SuSE 8.0 on a new machine and that worked absolutely great - all modern hardware was recognized and worked. Simply worked, without additional drivers as necesary in Windows XP in the same configuration. I was very impressed by that. Bye Kuesschen

  32. like a Mercedes-Benz (not always good) by chrestomanci · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am a SuSE user. I chose it over other distros, because I read a number of favourable reviews. One memorably refereed to it as "The Mercedes-Benz of Linux Distros".

    I would say this is correct, but not necessary in a good way.

    Like the car, It works very well when new, but anyone who tries to tweak of modify anything is liable to break it.

    I have concluded that this would probably make a good distro for my Dad, who just wants a reliable set-up, and won't try to install the latest hot thing of the net, but for myself, I intend to switch to a more hacker friendly distro, probably Debian.

  33. Re:in 2 weeks... by platos_beard · · Score: 2, Funny
    You'll be able to do an FTP install in about 3 weeks to 4 weeks.

    You really ought to get DSL or something if it takes that long

    --
    What's a sig?
  34. Re:Kernel by laserjet · · Score: 2

    yes.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  35. Shipping or Available for DL? by TexTex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's great that Suse's finished work on 8.0 and will sell me it for $40-80...but are they putting it on ftp sites yet for download in the spirit of Linux distros?

    I've always had a bit of a pain downloading 7.3 and it'd be great if they included some .iso files with 8.0 to make a truly easy install.

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
  36. They don't do it any more by anno1602 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's exactly what 8.0 changed. They now have several config files, one for every package. Hack away!

    1. Re:They don't do it any more by MobyTurbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's exactly what 8.0 changed. They now have several config files, one for every package. Hack away!
      The reason why they made the change is that the LSB spec says that this is the layout of the configuration files. SuSE is perhaps the most LSB complient distro; to some extent this is why there has been so much incompatability between Red Hat and SuSE packages. Red Hat sort of had followed their own standards. I say "had" because RH has announced that "by the end of this year" they'll be LSB complient.
  37. SuSE is a really good server platform by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use it on all my servers, you're probably right, Debian is the better tweakable linux.

    SuSE is really good for those of us that are starting because it comes with a NICELY documented book(s) explaining a lot of the basics and the medium difficulty stuff.

    They also usually have a tech in their IRC room who will answer questions for you.

    In the end I really like SuSE. It's done everything I've required and more. I usually use it as a server without a graphical front end, but even on my two workstations with the graphics, it installed nicely and didn't require me to know more than I need to know to use the systems. And one of them was a laptop.

    Two thumbs up!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  38. ISO availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's quite a shame that SuSE doesn't provide ISO images on their ftp. I understand they are merely trying to make some money off of their efforts, but they're turning away a significant portion of their potential customer base.

    SuSE was my first experience with linux (i actually purchased it), and I would like to give it another shot, but there is no way I am going out to drop cash on the whole package without trying it. I would be delighted if they even released a minimal base install ISO for download, and I'm sure many other people would agree. If I could try out a base install of the new system I would gladly go out and buy all of the additional CD's for a complete system. Unfortunately this isn't the case.

  39. modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM) by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    suse modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM)

    Ok, whats modified? Wheres the changelog? Is Andre's VM not included in 2.4.18?

    Currently I am using 2.4.19-pre7 with preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-1.patch. Im very happy, stable as hell, smooth desktop now. Really would like to know what Suse has modified.

  40. Re:A lot of changes... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    Never, ever do an update. I've never, ever had one go well. SuSE especially. Do like Packard Bell tech support always recommended. . . format & reinstall, and avoid problems.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  41. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
    Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.

    Nope, Red Hat is by barbeque-munchin', Confederate flag-wavin', NASCAR-lovin' rednecks.

    You got the noisy part right tho :).

  42. Re:A lot of changes... by sconest · · Score: 2

    YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use

    And gone am I as a SuSE user.
    YAST1 had that KISS touch that YAST2 has not.

    --
    Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
  43. Re:in 2 weeks... by Captain+Smooth · · Score: 2, Informative

    SuSE DOES provide ISOs. Just not for i386 CPUs. You can get them for PPC, SPARC, and Alpha though. :-)

    --


    The ability to monopolize an industry is insignificant, next to the power of the source.
  44. Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2

    I'd have to go digging through my old CDs, but there was a RedHat release that had "Redneck" as an install language choice. It was a hoot!

  45. A couple of problems? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    and it has a couple of problems. they still haven't fixed the memory resource allocator driver ide problem from 6.2.34. also, my pcmcia universal drive-part table is unsupported.

    Repeat after me. dot-zero releases are buggy Linux distros. The basic attitude (and perhaps justifiable) is that these releases are showcase distributions and the .1 releases really seam to be QA releases with a few new features.

    I remember 7.0 which handily would have metadata corruption with Raiserfs-- fixed in 7.1.

    Don't even get me started on Red Hat's or Conectiva's .0 releases.

    I will personally wait until 8.1 before upgrading.

    I only use dot-zero releases when I have little other choice.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  46. Re:Came on time for most people, for others it was by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Miss it too, just wish I could update RPM's as quickly as one did with yast1.

    StarTux

  47. Re:Get the Whole Load metrically by mpe · · Score: 2

    Why don't we just switch over to metric like the rest of the planet?

    Assuming the the "we" equates to the US it's probably to do with the US like to doing things differently from the rest of the planet. An extreme case of NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
    The US did actually sign the "Treaty of the metre", but since when did the US signing a treaty actually mean anything :)