Slashdot Mirror


Nanotechnology Harnesses the Power of Light

madirish2600 writes "There's a Washington Post story running about some German scientists who have used light to create a nanotechnology spring. 'Scientists have for the first time used the power of light to create mechanical energy for a microdevice, making a single molecule of plastic drive a tiny machine.'"

101 comments

  1. Fr0st PiSt

    --


  2. am I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Am I the first?

    w00t!

    1. Re:am I? by Whistler's+Mother · · Score: -1

      No You bastard, you are not... Props to all the Logged in TroLLs... Die AC Scum...

      --


  3. Finally... Stuff that matters. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is the first non-fluff story I think I've seen today.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  4. first foreign post by stallo · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fy faen, frossent piss.

    --
    try biting your ear while claping your hands... good, now you look like a moron
    1. Re:first foreign post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Du mener ligesom dette frosne pis?

    2. Re:first foreign post by stallo · · Score: -1

      å fy faen! tror det er en ny goatse ting på gang nå...

      --
      try biting your ear while claping your hands... good, now you look like a moron
  5. well, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Can I use it to drive this tiny machine?

  6. Why the `` quotes by PhilHibbs · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Can someone explain to me why someone would use use two backwards apostraphes at the beginning, and two double-quotes at the end of a quotation ``like this""?

    1. Re:Why the `` quotes by doooras · · Score: 1, Redundant

      there was a quotation inside the post, at the end there aren't two double-quotes, there's a single quote and a double quote.

    2. Re:Why the `` quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      He's quoting someone quoting. Don't you have something better to do then bitch about something like this? Jesus

    3. Re:Why the `` quotes by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      I'm not bitching, just curious where this idiom comes from. Anyway, I posted that to the wrong story (should have been the nitrogen fullerenes one).

    4. Re:Why the `` quotes by querist · · Score: 1

      The back quotes are used in TeX and LaTex to allow you to get the pretty quotes that turn the proper way just like professional printers use (or like you get in most modern word processors).

      I still find myself doing it from time to time.

    5. Re:Why the `` quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'm not bitching

      Shut up, bitch!

    6. Re:Why the `` quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      why is this redundant? the dude was answering the guy's question.

    7. Re:Why the `` quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Well, it looks like a fucking pile. It looks like someone couldn't figure out how quotation marks work.

  7. can they be hacked? by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Great, now lets just hope what ever os they use is secure, I wouldn't want little nano robots being controled by some 12 year old script kitty. Or maybe these could be implanted into digital media to disable your computer if you pirated any software?

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
    1. Re:can they be hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'd be worried about letting cats control these things too :)

    2. Re:can they be hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Shit, there's fucking blood everywhere! I'm getting blood on the fucking ceiling! Oh man!!

    3. Re:can they be hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'd like to have a 16-year old script kitty

    4. Re:can they be hacked? by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: -1

      Cut off your penis, man! Let it go!

  8. nasa and slashdot by neal+n+bob · · Score: -1

    two places both trying to get to ur-anus

  9. Tiny little guy by MrMadnutz · · Score: 2

    Now all they need is a microscopic diver to go off this diving board.

    1. Re:Tiny little guy by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      I think I've had these for a long time. Whenever i'm working in a dark room by the light of the CRT and my wife suddenly flips the light switch , I jump.

  10. CmdrTaco is a flag desecrator and Anti-Delawarian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    As noted on the Smithsonian Institution's site, the first official American flag had thirteen stars and thirteen stripes, each representing one of the thirteen original states.

    The flag icon for Slashdot's 'United States' section is missing its first stripe - the stripe that represents Delaware, the first state admitted to the Union. While a simple oversight could be forgiven, it should be known from here on out that Slashdot is in fact aware of the missing stripe, and even worse, refuses to do anything about it!

    This vulgar flag desecration and rabid anti-Delawarism must be put to a stop. Let the Slashdot crew know that we will not accept a knowingly mutilated flag or the insinuation that Delawarians deserve to be cut out of the union. I ask you, what has Delaware done to deserve this insolence, this wanton disregard, this bigotry?

    This intentional disregard of a vital national symbol is unpatriotic. Why, the flippant remarks CmdrTaco made about our flag border on terrorism! I urge you to join the protest in each 'United States' story. Sacrifice your karma for your country by pointing out this injustice. Let's all work together to get our flag back. Can you give your country any less?

  11. The designers should get with Rube Goldberg by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slightly off-topic, but imagine the merging of this technology with the whimsical, counter-intuitive machines of Rube Goldberg. The nanosprings could be combined with nanoballs, nanochutes, nanoratchets, nanopteradactyls, etc... to fabricate imaginative contraptions that would only be visible to high-power microscopes.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:The designers should get with Rube Goldberg by spagma · · Score: 1

      yeah, just think with all those nanosprings, and nanoballs, we can build a nanopinball game. Anyone up for a little (pun intended) tournament?

      --
      If it won't boot, Fsck it!
    2. Re:The designers should get with Rube Goldberg by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      with the microscope turned off, we're all "deaf dumb blind kid[s]"... but _Who_ can play "a mean pinball"?

      Puns you say?!
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  12. German scientists? by hettb · · Score: 0
    I will immediately recommend them to the chancellor of the order Pour le mérite. They deserve to be rewarded for their achievements in science!

    BTW, does anyone know if this technology could be used as a weapon against the USA during WW3??? (the new axis of evil just sucks ass, IMHO)

  13. kinky! by SharkPork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Azobenzene is known for its kinkiness. That made me laugh. After reading the article, I was thinking, "go go gadget" and some Maxwell Smart type things. Or maybe a fiber-optically powered hamster wheel? Is anyone else, at mention of nanotechnology, immediately reminded of MST3k? Speaking of Nanites, how about that one guy on techTV, that does the "Call for Help" segment? He reminds me of a nanite from MST3k every time I see him.

    --
    If you can read this, you are most likely close enough.
    1. Re:kinky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Oh fuck, I think I'm going to faint...

    2. Re:kinky! by mpweasel · · Score: 1

      Baby, why do you always insist on having the strobe light on when we're making love?

    3. Re:kinky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Are you still losing blood?

    4. Re:kinky! by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: -1

      I think he's dead. He didn't slash his schlong soon enough.

  14. The logical conclusion... by ultramk · · Score: 3, Funny

    an ensey-weensy Slinky.

    "look, it's walking!"
    "I can't see anything..."

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  15. It's a good thin when ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    there are sites dedicated to Investing in nanotechnology.
    www.nanoinvestornews.com

  16. FUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I just cut the vein on my cock! Theres blood everywhere!

    1. Re:FUCK! by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: -1

      That's pretty funny. From now on you will have curved cock erection for the rest of your life.

    2. Re:FUCK! by Chinese+Karma+Whore · · Score: -1

      Not to mention a bloody cock for the rest of his life.

  17. Obligatory Steve Martin reference: by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Lets get small.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. nano-Tech by antitribue · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure this whole tiny engine thing is good but I just want to know when this nano-technology is going to make ALL women as hot as 7 OF 9

    1. Re:nano-Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully, it'll be around the same time as slashnerds stop being the approximate shape of Jabba the Hut, or else you still won't get a date.

    2. Re:nano-Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but she's not hot. she has nice tits, yeah, but so do 99% of the pornstars out there. just rent Oral Action 7. Jesus.

  19. Can you imagine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A Beowulf cluster of these things?

  20. HELP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi -

    We are currently running a test at classmates.com to see how much of their audience is interested in searching for a job, which will help determine if Classmates should have their own careers section. You can view our link on the upper right hand side of the page by clicking on this link - http://www.classmates.com/decades/index.tf and looking under the "our favorites" section for the "Find your next JOB!" link.

    Here's what I need: Send this to a friend and ask them to check us out by clicking on the link entitled "Find your next JOB!" under the classmates "Our Favorites" area. By clicking on this, it brings you to grassisgreener.com. If the link is successful, they (Classmates) will consider a deeper partnership. THIS LINK IS ONLY UP FOR ANOTHER 24-48 HOURS depending on the test, so I NEED YOUR HELP ASAP.

    Note: Please click on this from home, as significant traffic coming from our own site will not prove out the test. It needs to be from outside of the building (AOL or another ISP). As well, your friends can help us spread the word.

    Thanks in advance and keep your fingers crossed!

  21. Solar? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder how feasable this would be in the long term as a replacement for solar panels. How much wattage can you get out of a square meter of light exposed surface?

    1. Re:Solar? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Little magnets mounted on the spring, in little coils, changing the light path to the spring by their own movement? I like it. A huge field (huge=1cm**2) all making high-frequency AC, rectified and combined. DC with a blue-noise component.
      Unfortunately, at a working life under 24h, they'd be even less cost-effective than modern silicon cells.

    2. Re:Solar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same idea, but what I don't understand is why they would only last for 24 hours? Would the light chemicaly change the molecule? How could this "change" happen slowly? I mean, if light would, what, knock off some electrons and break the bonds of the molecule, wouldn't this happen all at once? Can the molecule "store" light damage until a certain critical point, and then "break"??

      I always thought it was more like muscle fibers. All or nothing, so that, when peroxide goes bad by being left out in the sun, for example, it gradualy changes, chemicaly, but if you "zoomed" in, you'd see molecules either changed or still peroxide...

      I guess I don't understand how a single molecular spring could take 24 hours to "break"? Surely they bonds can't get tired in some fashion, right? I mean, water molecules never get tired of exchanging bonds, it pretty much just stays as water unless it's chemicaly changed, no?

      *scratches head*

  22. Re:CmdrTaco is a flag desecrator and Anti-Delawari by micromoog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's pretty funny. I'd kinda forgotten Delaware existed, and I guess CmdrTaco did too.

  23. The logical conclusion...IS RecipeTrolls S'MORES by RecipeTroll · · Score: -1
    CAMPFIRE S'MORES

    For homemade graham crackers
    8 tablespoons softened butter
    2 tablespoons brown sugar
    2 tablespoons sugar
    2 teaspoons honey
    1 cup flour
    1/4 cup whole wheat pastry flour
    pinch of salt
    1/4 teaspoon baking soda
    1/4 teaspoon cinnamon

    For marshmallows
    3 envelopes of Knox gelatin
    1/2 cup cold water
    2 cups granulated sugar
    2/3 cups corn syrup
    1/4 cup water
    1/4 teaspoon salt
    1 tablespoon vanilla extract

    Chocolate
    High-grade bittersweet or milk chocolate (Valrhona, Cacao du Barry, Callebaut, Scharffen Berger)

    Make graham crackers
    Preheat the oven to 350F.

    Cream the butter, sugars, and honey in a mixer on medium speed until soft and fluffy. Sift together the flours, salt, baking soda, and cinnamon, and pour into the mixing bowl. Mix on slow speed until just combined. Turn out the mixture onto a clean surface. Press the crumbly looking dough together with your hands until it just holds together.

    Press the dough onto a 12 x 16-inch piece of parchment paper. Shape the dough into a rectangle and cover it with another 12 x 16-inch piece of parchment. Roll the dough out very thin by rolling from the middle of the paper outward. If the dough is difficult to roll, add a tiny bit of flour between the parchment and the dough on both sides. Transfer the dough onto a baking sheet, patching it to make an exact rectangle.

    Bake the dough until the top is golden brown, slightly blistered, and dry-looking, 8 to 10 minutes. Remove the baking sheet from the oven. Use an angel food cake cutter or a fork to mark rows of holes, 1/4 inch apart, all over the dough.

    Trim the rough outside edges and cut the dough into 14 to 16 squares, about 3 inches each. Use a ruler to make straight cuts and work quickly -- the crackers become difficult to cut when they cool. Bake until the cut crackers are a deep golden brown, another 2 to 4 minutes (they will burn quickly, so take care at this stage). Cool them and store them in an airtight container.

    Make marshmallows
    In the bowl of an electric mixer, sprinkle gelatin over 1/2 cup cold water. Soak for 10 minutes. Combine sugar, corn syrup, and 1/4 cup water in a small saucepan. Bring to a boil and boil hard for 1 minute. Pour boiling syrup into gelatin and mix at high speed. Add the salt and beat for 12 minutes. Add vanilla and incorporate into mixture. Scrape into a 9 x 9-inch pan lined with oiled plastic wrap and spread evenly. (Note: Lightly oil hands and spatula or bowl scraper). After pouring marshmallow mixture into the pan, take another piece of plastic wrap and press mixture into the pan.

    Let mixture sit for a few hours. Remove from pan, dredge the marshmallow slab with confectioners' sugar and cut into 12 equal pieces with scissors (the best tool for the job) or a chef's knife. Dredge each piece of marshmallow in confectioners' sugar. Broil the marshmallows until brown, or toast over campfire or hot coals.

    Assemble
    Place a cooked marshmallow on top of a graham cracker. Top the marshmallow with shaved bittersweet or milk chocolate and place another graham cracker on top of the marshmallow to make a sandwich. Garnish the sandwich and plate with a bit more shaved chocolate.

    Makes 6 servings.

  24. Haven't read the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but from the description I get this mental image of a plastic molecule in tiny overalls driving a tractor. Nanotech is so cute!

  25. Optics by fabjep · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If these things can be tuned to specific frequencies as was suggested, I would think this would have some fun oplications in digital photography miniaturization or transplant retinas or something like that.

    --
    - learn mathematics - shoot dope -
    1. Re:Optics by fabjep · · Score: 1

      Rather artificial replacement retinas.

      --
      - learn mathematics - shoot dope -
    2. Re:Optics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Hmm.. something like this transplant I guess.

  26. Now they can make all sorts of cool stuff by Astrorunner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like shockabsorbers for nanocars.

    Retractable ball-point nanopens.

    And perhaps the best, what rolls down nanostairs, alone or in pairs, the nanoslinky.

  27. Re:The logical conclusion...IS RecipeTrolls S'MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Got a good recipe for chicken cordon bleu?

  28. Tiny motors... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, so now we got the motors, the gears. Now all we need are the wheels, a good nanostereo system and GM can sell cars to bacteria.

    These things are all very interesting, but has anyone managed to do anything of use with them?

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    1. Re:Tiny motors... by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 1

      In their "Long term research" section, NASA Ames claims to be working on a 10^18 MIPS Babbage-style mechanical computer from nanotubes - perhaps powered by these little nanosprings?

      --
      I'd rather be flying
  29. where does the energy comes from ? by Guignol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that it's not really energy power that creates mechanical energy as in "energy conversion" but rather that light energy triggers something in the molecule.
    One specific frequency makes it contract, another one makes it expand itself, behaving then much like a spring and possibly moving a weight or bending a board.
    the article is light on details (no pun intended), but I don't feel the light energy, related to its frequency has much to do with the released, or activated mechanical energy, and it seems to me that in fact bending the board might represent more work from the molecule than what the activating light is providing, so I think some energy could be leaked from the molecule itself.
    Besides, the article says near the end that the molecule breaks after being used a whole day so that tere is work to be done, which makes me feel that indeed, some energy might be taken from the very molecule to achieve the "spring effect".
    But then, what work could they actually do against that ? the destruction of the structure is bound to happen unless the pure photonic energy is used in the experiment (but then, why would it break in the first place, and how would that work ?)
    Any chemist or physicist to correct me or explain me how this is working ?

    1. Re:where does the energy comes from ? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      If it weren't energy conversion, you would only be able to bend the board once. Otherwise you would be getting energy from nowhere, or "using up" the molecules. But if you were doing that, the thing would only work for a very short period of time, not a whole day. There are other mechanisms to explain the photodamage to the azobenzene. I don't know anything about this molecule in particular, but in general irreversible light damage occurs through either free radical reactions catalyzed by the light or bumping the electrons up to an energy state where they can fall to two (or more) separate states. One of these is the one you want, and the other one isn't, and each time a certain percentage of the molecules will get stuck there and not work any more.

    2. Re:where does the energy comes from ? by Guignol · · Score: 1

      If it weren't energy conversion, you would only be able to bend the board once. Otherwise you would be getting energy from nowhere, or "using up" the molecules
      Hmm yes, it's more or less what I was trying to imagine (if I understood you correctly), a long enough intricated molecule that could lose some electron in some of its parts due to the light, and gaining back the electrons from surrounding atoms, causing it to bend (for some reason)
      Then, another frequency would create a similar effect, but to other parts of the molecule, rebalancing it. This could be done again and again, with electrons being exchanged from here to there and back in the molecule, but sooner or later, some of them would be completely lost (ejected from the molecule).
      I suppose that when some electrons are partially ejected, the overall electrical balance is still met (neutral) but locally, electromagnetic dipoles are created forcing the molecules "parts" to get closer or farther...

    3. Re:where does the energy comes from ? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      But you're pulling energy out of the system by moving the board, and that energy has to come from somewhere. I don't know enough about the physics of what's really going on, but this is simple conservation of energy. However, I doubt that the force comes from electromagnetic dipoles. I think it's more likely that the light bumps up an electron, causing that atom to have a different type of orbital, bringing it into conjugation with other orbitals, which changes which conformation of the molecule ("long" or "short") is most stable, or something along those lines. But I am not a physicist or physical chemist by any means. However, bumping the electrons up to higher energy orbitals DOES directly convert the energy of that photon into a different form, and those electron orbital changes are the basis for the movement, so this system IS directly transducing the light into mechanical energy.

    4. Re:where does the energy comes from ? by Guignol · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's pretty much what I was trying to say. (sorry I do a bad job to do so)
      My point being, (about not transforming energy but rather releasing it, leading sooner or later to a destruction of the molecule) that it's not the energy of the photon that is transformed into mechanical energy (having the same energy out than in thus) but (mechanical) energy released (thank's to the photon).

  30. Pure Sensationalism by Snafoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *Yawn*. Next, after the commercial break:

    -Scientists use magnetism to do stuff
    -Scientists use gravity to linearly accelerate falling objects
    -Scientists harness laws of physics in a creative fashion

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:Pure Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "- Scientists use gravity to linearly accelerate falling objects "

      WRONG!
      Now get out of my physics lab!

  31. Where have I seen this before? by Hooray+Beer · · Score: 1

    power of light to create mechanical energy

    Isn't it like solar car racing...on a really small scale? Eh? Something like this?

    --
    Hooray Beer!!!
  32. Info about Nanotechnology... by dwheeler · · Score: 5, Informative
    Presumably many readers know a little about nanotechnology, but in case you're looking for beginning information about it, here are a few places to look:
    1. Nanotechplanet's Nanotechnology FAQ
    2. Foresight's FAQ about Molecular Nanotechnology
    3. Richard Feynman's ``There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom'' (an old classic that essentially started the field).
    4. Engines of Creation (by K. Eric Drexler, Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1986)
    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
    1. Re:Info about Nanotechnology... by Saeger · · Score: 3, Informative
      And below are links to the full texts of Drexler's Engines of Creation, and Unbounding the Future. If you've got the time, they're both great reads, especially since it reads like scifi, but isn't.
      --
      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:Info about Nanotechnology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      especially since it reads like scifi, but isn't.

      Oh yes it is. Drexler is known throughout the scientific community as a crackpot and a fraud. His "molecular nanotechnology" ideas have NO scientific basis. If anyone seriously thinks you can have little robots built out of atoms, then I have a bridge to sell them. There is such a thing as quantumn mechanics and the uncertainty principle, it just isn't possible to make machines out of atoms. SciAm had some good articles debunking his ideas.

  33. RE: Insecure kitty by plotz · · Score: 1
    my cat hasn't quite mastered his keyboarding skills, but probably knows as much about os programming as the avg scriddie

    "I wouldn't want little nano robots being controled by some 12 year old script kitty"

    I agree completely.

  34. photovoltaic cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait this is the first time we've harnesed the power of light? wish people would think before they let their fingers hammer out some inane bullshit.

    1. Re:photovoltaic cells? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Read the article. This is the first time we have converted light directly into mechanical energy at the microscopic level.

    2. Re:photovoltaic cells? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      Unless you count bacteriorhodopsin, a photosynthetic protein in certain bacteria. Light energy is used to change the physical shape of the protein and move hydrogen atoms from one side of a membrane to the other. This is direct conversion of light to mechanical energy (although it is not usually used that way), and since the 70's there has been a lot of work with this protein making different sensor arrays and so forth.

    3. Re:photovoltaic cells? by uberdave · · Score: 1
      Interesting article, but it seems to me like this is more of a photochemical process than a photomechanical one. Shine a light on the protein, and it absorbs a H+ ion. Remove the light, and an H+ ion comes out the other side.

      Besides, I get the impression that this is a naturally occurring substance rather than an artificial mechanical construct.

      So... No, I'm not going to count it. (He said confidently, ignoring the fact that he has no say in the matter in the first place.)

    4. Re:photovoltaic cells? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      At the molecular scale, there is no difference between chemistry and physics. That's what chemistry is - moving around atoms and groups thereof.

    5. Re:photovoltaic cells? by Zurk · · Score: 1

      problem is photomechanical processses like this one cause strain and the material breaks in a day. its not (yet) a reusable transfer unless they figure out how to do repairs. could be useful for CDR type applictions though.

    6. Re:photovoltaic cells? by uberdave · · Score: 1
      I disagree. Chemistry is about how molecules bond together, how their electron shells intermingle, and how the constituent atoms behave. Physics is about how molecules bump each other about. It is entirely possible for two molecules to collide and rebound off of each other without either molecule changing form. There is no chemical interaction, but there is a physical interaction.

      Granted much of it is the same thing, but some of it is not. What we're talking about is one molecule getting shorter, and dragging a chunk of silicon with it, as opposed to a protein which absorbs one H+ ion at one end, and ejects another (different) H+ ion out the other end.

    7. Re:photovoltaic cells? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      We're all skating on some thin semantic ice here, but bacteriorhodopsin DOES operate mechanically. It actually does mechanically pick up individual protons and move them from one place to another. The protons are not somehow magically absorbed with new protons being produced on the other side. If you don't believe that, there is a related protein called halorhodopsin that does the same thing with chloride anions.

      It's true that these molecules exist in nature, but that doesn't change the fact that people are experimenting with using them for all kinds of completely non-natural things like high-density optical memory, bizarre types of sensors, etc. If you type bacteriorhodopsin into the patent database, there are 197 patents associated with it, and probably half to two-thirds of those are not biological applications. Would you feel differently about the molecule if someone synthesized it using a peptide synthesizer? I don't know if that's been done or not... And I'm not saying that the springboard thing isn't different and potentially more useful, just that bacteriorhodopsin is a molecule people use that directly transduces light energy into mechanical energy.

    8. Re:photovoltaic cells? by uberdave · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I am not reading the descriptions of the ion pump process properly. I am not a molecular biochemist, after all, and some of the terminology is making my head spin. However, the descriptions I've read talk about the protonation and deprotonation of substructures of the protein, which sounds to me like the ion becomes part of protein. To my mind, this makes it a chemical process. (Actually, from what I've been able to piece together, the ions are passed from substructure to substructure within the protein like buckets in a bucket brigade.)

      I think that the point of the article is that this is the first time we have built a photomechanical nanotech device, rather than isolating and utilizing something that mother nature had already put there.

    9. Re:photovoltaic cells? by lukesl · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it depends who you ask. Although protons technically bond covalently to the atoms of the side chains, very few biochemists would think of that as becoming part of the protein. Plus, the protein is translocating them. Well, in any case, this new thing is a big achievement, and the molecules involved are certainly easier to work with than something like bacteriorhodopsin.

  35. flea circus by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So if they get the diving board to move a filter that switches between the two wavelengths, they can make the nanospring flex cyclically?

    Boingy boingy boingy

    1. Re:flea circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello?! This was meant as a joke. Please mod it as "funny" and not "insightful".

  36. light, nano, and linux by tps12 · · Score: 1
    I'm wondering...what will control these little robots when we finally figure out how to build them?

    You know...I think it will look a lot like Linux.

    Lots of little units all working together. Reminds me of the daemons of the Linux OS, or the good people who volunteer on OSS projects.

    Everything is getting smaller, and that's the way I like it.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:light, nano, and linux by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      Damn sure they ain't gonna run Windows XP.

  37. But what about ardvarks?!! by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    And hamsters?!
    And Fish?!
    And female zebras in heat?!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  38. Memory by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By shining one frequency of light on the device, the team was able to crimp the molecule, causing it to pull the diving board downward - converting light into mechanical energy. When another light frequency was used, the molecule relaxed.

    Not quite sure, but if the molecule stays in the kinked or relaxed state absent all light, could they not mount little mirrors on top that would swivel and then use this tech as a massive, persistent, extremely fast, storage mechanism? Sort of like a re-writeable CD but in solid state?

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:Memory by MJArrison · · Score: 1

      Who said the contraction happened quickly? My guess is that the contraction happens over a few milliseconds and not instantly. This would kinda default any memory applications. Although, here's to hoping :)

    2. Re:Memory by martyb · · Score: 2
      Not quite sure, but if the molecule stays in the kinked or relaxed state absent all light, could they not mount little mirrors on top that would swivel and then use this tech as a massive, persistent, extremely fast, storage mechanism? Sort of like a re-writeable CD but in solid state?

      I'll grant you that's an interesting concept. it would be interesting to see what comes of further research! Unfortunately, given the current state of the art, they currently have some trouble with the persistent part:

      Gaub acknowledged, however, that his molecular device is not ready for the marketplace. The chief impediment is that the molecule breaks after the experiment runs for a day.

      That leads me to wonder what kind of duty cycle they were putting this through. Even if it would not hold up in applications such as RAM, maybe it would be okay for something like flash memory? Also, although they have been able to turn it on/off with different frequencies of light, are those the only stimuli that could cause it to toggle? What about gamma rays and other forms of background radiation?

      I have some concerns about addressability, too. It's one thing to have millions of these that can all be turned on or off together with a broad beam of light... but how to do you address a single one of these? That's a single molecule that activates the spring! I'm not saying it's impossible, only that it's a non-trivial task to advance this to the point where its density would rival that of currently available DRAM chips!

  39. Re:The logical conclusion...IS RecipeTrolls S'MORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thanks recipe troll.

    That recipe sounds yummy, I'd like to try it.
    But, my guests would be put off by the blodd all over the place right now, so I'll have to try this some other time.
    I'm not feeling too good right now, I think I'll sit down for a moment.

  40. The power of light? That's nothing! by infinite9 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Behold: the power of cheese.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  41. Optical Tweezers (not so new...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This isn't exactly new...

    This seems to be an application of "optical tweezers". The use of electromagnetic field gradients of a focused spot has been used to uncoil as well as determine the "spring constant" (tension) of single DNA strands.The technique has been fairly common for the past 5 years. All they have done here is attach a large molecule to a diving board. The DNA experiments have already demonstrated "simple machines", although in that case the DNA is the spring.

    DNA molecules grafted on silicon with optical tweezers
    Femtonewton Force Spectroscopy of Single Extended DNA Molecules

  42. Use them to make light amplifying mirrors. by jrifkin · · Score: 1
    How about this ... Make each "diving board" a shiny mirror, and arrange them on top of transparent flat surface to create one large mirror.

    Now, shine a light through the transparent surface. The brighter the light, the more the mirror bends.

    You can use this two ways

    1. Project an image through the transparent bottom layer. The projected image will be reproduced by the reflected light off the mirrored top. Its an image amplifier. Something like those TI (?) chips they use in video projectors, only it amplifies light directly.

    2. Suitably adjust the light intensity through the transparent layer, and you have dynamically controlled mirror optics.
    Just thought I'd share that.
  43. Use of light on the molecular level.. by batquux · · Score: 1

    And plants have been doing it for millennia...

  44. How ... by m4ik · · Score: 1

    ... the heck did they attach the molecule? Molecular glue? A _very_ small nail? Those tiny moving things scare me.

    --
    Quod in aeternum cubet mortuum non est,
    Et saeculis miris actis etiam Mors perierit
  45. Anyone heard of a Crooke's Radiometer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.howstuffworks.com/question239.htm

    It spins around being only powered by light (well heat from light)

  46. One Step Closer to Gray Goop by Skwidd · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'll be looking into that Russian space shuttle for sale afterall. Wonder if I could get some Tang and space rations as an upgrade...

  47. Part of that is just plain impossible. by n9hmg · · Score: 1

    I would expect that at that scale, the electrostatic attraction of even a single-electron imbalance would be stronger than gravity, and keep the balls from rolling or sliding.

  48. I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you can "twist" these into a "rope", or some kind of macrosubstance that will contract when you shine light on it of a particular frequency.

    It might give us a way to transmit energy over distances - shine a laser on a bank of these things to generate mechanical energy, which then drives a dynamo.

    Probably wouldn't be particularly efficient, though.

  49. It's emerging. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

    Long ago, in our terms, like 50 years, people could barely conceive nanotechnology.

    Now look at this..

    Nanotech has emerged in everyday surroundings: the newest sub-micron chip-lithography's smallest elements exist on the nanotech scale.

    Now we have pioneers. Like these scientists who have harnessed the power of light in a controllable way, on a very small scale.

    Can you conceive, perceive, or believe what this implies?

    Just try getting past the first part.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  50. Not the first by tony_gardner · · Score: 2
    These guys have been doing it for a while:

    Laser tweezers

    , of course, it begs the question as to whether the machine is minaturised is the power source is macroscopic.

  51. Engine? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

    I wonder, if you just let ordinary white light fall on the molecule, does it keep on bouncing wildly as it gets hit by different photons of the frequencies of light that it is sensitive to?