Slashdot Mirror


Atari Announces an Official Portable 2600 System

Bill Kendrick writes: "Infogrames (the folks who now own Atari) have just struck a deal with another company to produce a 10-in-1 video game system based on the Atari 2600. It'll be joystick-shaped, plug into a TV set, cost only $20, and include games like Combat, Asteroids, Missile Command, and my favorite, Adventure! It won't replace my Atari 2600 Jr and 60 cartridges, but it's a step in the right direction!"

102 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Hell Yah by red5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if only I could get games for my lynx :)

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    1. Re:Hell Yah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      try http://www.atarihq.de
      they delivered to me 8 times reliably

    2. Re:Hell Yah by Tet · · Score: 4, Informative
      Now if only I could get games for my lynx :)

      If you live in the UK, head on down to your local Game store. Mine's still selling Lynx and Jaguar games (and indeed, Jaguar consoles!).

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:Hell Yah by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Songbird Productions ( http://songbird.atari.net/ ) produces NEW Atari Lynx games. :)

  2. I really cannot see it being "take anywhere". by Disevidence · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, imagine having a joystick-like thing in your pocket, walking to a friends house down the street?

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  3. Original? by supercytro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing how Atari are constantly heard to resurrect itself only to push out the same games again and again, only to surprise itself when it doesn't pay off profitably... even in this instance, cheap many-in-one tv classic games systems have been sold so it's not even first with this strategy...

    1. Re:Original? by Mimsy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is what happened with Atari.

      It got split into 2 seperate entities.

      Atari. (Home Entertainment)
      Atari Games (Arcade Entertainment)

      Warner Communications sold Atari to JTS i think, which sold it to Hasbro Interactive which Hasbro sold off to Infogrames of France.

      Warner Spun off Atari games as a subsiderary of them. Warner sold the Division to Midway.

      So that's why there is a little confusinon here.

      Hope this clears this up.

      --
      A Jedi doesn't drink Coors, a Jedi Drinks Guinness or Bass!
    2. Re:Original? by Surak · · Score: 2

      Clear as mud. ;)

      So which Atari is this and who owns them?

    3. Re:Original? by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Atari. ;)

      The home entertainment division, which is the only Atari left. It was sold to Infogrames a while back, and since Infogrames is in the story, that's the division involved.

      Midway's arcade division shut down months ago (a few months after the Williams pinball division got axed), so for all intents and purposes Atari Games (the arcade division) is dead. Midway, the home entertainment division, is still alive and kicking.

      I'm not sure how the intellectual property is all handled, since Infogrames has been putting out PC ports of old arcade games under the Atari brand. Seems like Midway might be able to do the same with old Atari games.

      But, then again, Midway needs profitability at this point... putting out old titles seems like wonderful ideas, I just so rarely see it actually result in profits.

      Though, personally, I wish I had picked up more Infocom Treasures collections... I only got the first one released for the Mac, and there were one or two after that. Then there were a few that never made it far enough to get ported... (sigh)

      --

      Moof!

    4. Re:Original? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2

      So which Atari is this and who owns them?


      I think infogrames owns Atari home entertainment now. I just got Transworld Surf for the ps2 which is published by infogrames, but throws up an Atari splash screen at the start.

    5. Re:Original? by ShavenYak · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, then again, Midway needs profitability at this point... putting out old titles seems like wonderful ideas, I just so rarely see it actually result in profits.

      But it's so simple:

      Phase 1: Release old video game
      Phase 2: ?
      Phase 3: Profit!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    6. Re:Original? by Y-Crate · · Score: 2
      It's amazing how Atari are constantly heard to resurrect itself only to push out the same games again and again, only to surprise itself when it doesn't pay off profitably
      Hey, it always worked for Nintendo! ;)
    7. Re:Original? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      A modern kid wouldn't be seen dead with some joystick playing old Atari games. $79 dollars extra gets you a modern Game Boy Advance several orders of magnitude more powerful than this.

      ...but do they have Pitfall! for GBA? Didn't think so. (Then again, this gadget doesn't have it either...think I'll hang onto the Sears Tele-Games (rebadged six-switch 2600) I snagged off of eBay last year.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  4. In related news.... by neier · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony reacted to the new product as expected. Effective Friday, the price on all PS2's will be dropped to $19.95....

    1. Re:In related news.... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      In a shock announcement in reply to Sony's announcement Microsoft said they would be giving away a free X-Box with each copy of Windows.

    2. Re:In related news.... by sniepre · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean,
      "In a shock announcement in reply to Sony's announcement Microsoft said they would be giving away a free X-Box with each copy of Windows XP Gaming Edition, the bundle value priced at $399.95."

      -sni

      --
      Is not life a hundred times too short for us to bore ourselves? -Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
  5. this would make the teenager I used to be drool... by dario_moreno · · Score: 2

    10 games and a console for $20 !
    think about getting richer !

    it's the same with MAME or P2P to get
    records from the 80's : my purchasing power
    has increased by millions, well beyond
    my wildest dreams of the time !

    10's of consoles and computers for a few bucks,
    thousands of games and weeks of pop music...

    funny how a 1981 Porsche in good shape
    still costs a lot...
    (think Risky Business here)

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  6. Mega Joy 2 by FrenZon · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's something like this already available in the mega joy 2 - since the games are all unlicenced, they all have different names, but you get three-times the names.

    1. Re:Mega Joy 2 by raindog2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The MJ2 and its various clones are actually based on the NES (8-bit Nintendo). Still nostalgic, and I'd buy it just to play Mappy on hotel room TV's, but really aimed at the generation after those who would buy this Atari thing ;)

      OTOH, there is already a licensed Activision one which I see now and then at Toys-R-Us and Walmart, and that one is based on the 2600 (and includes Pitfall, among others.) In fact, it's from the same Jakks subsidiary, Toymax:

      http://www.toymax.com/ToyCentral/EL/10in1.htm

      As I understand it, it's not actually a complete clone of the 2600, just enough to get those specific games working (and apparently the Atari-licensed ones in the new version as well.)

  7. Cool. by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2

    Though you can get a NES clone in the UK - built into a N64 controller - for £15-30!

  8. Atari 2600 schematics and details by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone have the Atari 2600 schematics and details of its consruction and roms? Every year the third years have to create something as a part of their third year project and its allways something that never gets used anyway. So making all the chips in hardware on an FPGA might be cool.

    1. Re:Atari 2600 schematics and details by TheAlchemist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, we have schematics of the 2600 on our site, you can find them here:

      Atari 2600 Schematics - NTSC
      Atari 2600 Schematics - PAL

      As for details of its construction and roms, there are quite a few knowledgable people who visit our message boards, and they can probably answer any specific questions you have.

    2. Re:Atari 2600 schematics and details by Megane · · Score: 2
      In order to do this, you would need VHDL of a 6502 core, the RIOT I/O chip, and most importantly, the Stella graphics chip, perhaps the only 1-D graphics chip ever made.

      It would be tough to emulate the quirks of Stella without knowledge of the exact circuitry it used (the details of which are probably lost to history), but for a limited subset of games such as this, you could do testing to make sure all the games work. Emulating Stella is the most complex part of any software Atari 2600 emulator.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  9. One thing missing... by x136 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be perfect (in my book) if it had an actual 2600 cartridge slot. Both joysticks for my 2600 are pretty much dead, the console itself may be too. But I have a bunch of games I miss playing, and emulation doesn't cut it for me.

    That said, it's still cool. :) Too bad it doesn't have River Raid built in. Oh well.

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:One thing missing... by tregoweth · · Score: 2

      That's okay -- this has River Raid. And I still suck at it...

  10. Sad really by Diabolical · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's sad to see Atari's legacy being abused by yet another company who just lives on Atari's fame.

    Atari used to be a great systems manufacturer as well as a gaming company. Their ST line was very good and could compete with the Amiga in it's days. Their STacy an STBook were great portables where the STBook was way better then what any company could offer as a portable. It took years for the industrie to reach the same kind of portability as the STBook offered.

    Alas, Atari is no more. The companies diverse owners just broke it into little parts and sold them to the highest bidders.. There are few companies which have had a change of ownership so frequently as Atari has.

    Take a look at http://www.atari-history.com for some background information on Atari and it's products

    1. Re:Sad really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it could compete and then lose with the Amiga. Seriously, the Amiga was so much better than the ST. The AmigaOS was exceptionally well-desgined and resource-efficient (for the time), and the Amiga gfx hardware was extremely powerful (for the time), with some better 2D abilities than even modern PC gfx cards (sync-to-external-video capability and sub-pixel scrolling, for example, not to mention the beam-synchronised gfx coprocessor for special effects...)

      It's just a shame the Amiga and Atari ST spent so much time fighting eachother, instead of the real enemy, the PC, which was so incredibly inferior to either at the time.

    2. Re:Sad really by larien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let the ST vs Amiga flamewars commence! :)

    3. Re:Sad really by goodEvans · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's sad to see Atari's legacy being abused by yet another company who just lives on Atari's fame.

      JUST LIVES ON ATARI'S FAME? Infogrames has been around and making bloody great games for nearly 20 years! I had Infogrames games on my old Amstrad CPC464, back in 1986-89!

      I smell a troll...

    4. Re:Sad really by Lictor · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but could you play multiplayer netmaze on several Amigas by daisy-chaining their MIDI ports together?

      Oh yeah, and I think you could actually use the ST MIDI ports for MIDI too ;) Seriously though, before Macs became (slightly) more affordable, there was a time when an ST with Cubase was a decent sequencing solution.

    5. Re:Sad really by radish · · Score: 2


      Everyone's forgetting the STe, which had most of those things (i.e. Stereo sound with a DSP for hardware playback, blitter, etc).

      So from an avid ST owner what does it offer over the Amiga? Well there's a real, DOS compatible file system for a start. The Amiga didn't have directories on it's floppys, so we would laugh as the Amiga owner stuck in a disk full of mods and waited for 40 seconds while it scanned the disk to build the dir tree. By that time we were already rocking :)

      STs were (IMHO) also more reliable that Amigas too...there was a joke going round I remember - "What's the difference between an Amiga and a Boeing?" - "A Boeing can only crash the once".

      And STs looked better. Anyway, I got bored of these arguments 10 years ago :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Sad really by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      It's sad to see Atari's legacy being abused by yet another company who just lives on Atari's fame.

      JUST LIVES ON ATARI'S FAME? Infogrames has been around and making bloody great games for nearly 20 years! I had Infogrames games on my old Amstrad CPC464, back in 1986-89!

      FWIW, I don't think anybody in the States had even heard of them until a couple of years or so ago. (The first I'd ever heard of them was some DMCA-related bullying on their part that had been posted to /. ...my initial reaction was "Info-who?") I even spent a few years in Europe in the mid-80s, and don't recall hearing of them then. (Then again, I had a TI-99/4A and an Apple IIe at home and DoDDS put various Atari computers in its schools (though they started buying Apple IIGS systems in '87 or '88). If they weren't publishing for those systems, I wouldn't have had any use for them.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:Sad really by DrCode · · Score: 2

      Even though I wrote software for the ST, and have never used an Amiga, I'd guess that you're right. The Atari did offer a powerful piece of hardware at a good price; but the OS, 'TOS', was not well-developed. I was one of the earliest app. developers (HabaWriter), and constantly had to fight with bugs that never seemed to get fixed. The GUI was a port of GEM, but was not nearly as stable as the x86 version.

      (Funny, though, how GEM could run on both big- and little-endian systems way back in the mid-80's.)

    8. Re:Sad really by dswensen · · Score: 2

      FWIW, I don't think anybody in the States had even heard of them until a couple of years or so ago.

      So by "anybody in the States," you mean "you," I think.

      Infogrames published Alone in the Dark back in 1993, which was one of the first games I played on an old 386. That's a little longer than a couple of years ago, as old as it makes me feel to say that. I know I can't be the only person who remembers Alone in the Dark, for crying out loud.

  11. Re:Atari Joysticks by KILNA · · Score: 2

    Ergo be damned, I miss the Atari and (blast from the past) Wico joysticks of old. They withstood my lower-middle-class whiteboy-in-an-ethnic-neighborhood angst, plowing photon torpedos against the Krylons in Star Raiders.

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  12. It's NOT an Atari 2600 -- don't be confused by psyconaut · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe, until I'm corrected, that this is not actually an Atari 2600 (or anything even vaguely similar) but rather Jakks existing hardware system with classic Atari games ported to it.

    (Just to clear up the comments about "wish it had a cartridge slot).

    -marc

  13. Re:The point being? by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, would someone please enlighten me a bit on this matter?
    Who on earth wants to play atari 2600 games?


    Think of it this way..
    Playing atari games is kinda like bringing back good memories really cheaply.. hell if it comes with pit-fall i'd pay 20 bux to be able to plug into an rca jack anywhere and play.. it's fun..
    Think if it this way..
    Its the same thing as wanting or going back to an old gf(or bf i suppose.. dunno not, gay) ya know what your getting, when your getting, know where and how to hit all the right buttons and since you've played it alot before you can just shut it off when your done :)

  14. Wico joysticks r00l by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    I got my first one fourth-hand, and it was smooth and awesome. I was always looking for its equal in a stick for a second player (mostly for use with my c64,) and was never able to find it.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Wico joysticks r00l by Megane · · Score: 2

      That's because the Wico used real leaf switches, just like arcade machines used. I snag one every now and then for a buck or two at a thrift store, and eventually I'll get around to converting a few of them for the Atari 7800 or ColecoVision right buttons. (I lucked into a pair of 3rd-party keypads for ColecoVision which have a joystick port, but they still need a joystick with a right button.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Replayability? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Name one single atari 2600 game that actually has a decent plot, good replayability, long shelflife and non-repetitive gameplay."

    Plot: Do you complain when your game of checkers doesn't have any love interests in it?

    Replayability: the name of the game with these old Atari games. You never really beat them- you're mostly competing against yourself.

    Shelflife: Witness the plethora of 2600 emulators out there. Geez.

    Non-repetitive gameplay: See "plot", above. What are you looking for, final fantasy?

    Old Atari games may not have beautiful, amazing graphics, but many of them are unbeatable in the arena of actual gameplay.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Replayability? by Yorrike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. Now if only Nintendo would release an NES controller with the original Donkey Kong and other Game and Watch remakes built in.

      Or, a similar system to this Atari deal, but with Commodore 64 titles built in. Oh to play Raid Over Moscow or the original ChopLifter 2 (I know, I can get an emulator to do it all, but it's just not the same... it feels hollow)

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:Replayability? by spyderbyte23 · · Score: 2
      Agreed. Now if only Nintendo would release an NES controller with the original Donkey Kong and other Game and Watch remakes built in.
      Something very much like this was released by a mysterious company called Mega Joy -- an N64 controller that contained 50-odd Nintendo games. The Register has details.

      A friend of mine bought this and likes his a lot, although he's not much of a gamer. The Reg mentions them selling for ten pounds in the UK; I think my friend says his was about ~$20.

      It seems you can't buy them any more, of course. There are none listed on eBay, and googling for them some time back didn't turn up anything, so I assume Nintendo burned down the factory producing them, and seeded the ground with salt.

      --
      -- Support Ometz le-Serev.
    3. Re:Replayability? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "Non-repetitive gameplay: See "plot", above. What are you looking for, final fantasy?"

      If you're looking for "Final Fantasy," you're looking in the wrong place. I've played through "Final Fantasy" 3 times now; it seems very repetitive to me.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    4. Re:Replayability? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      Something very much like this was released by a mysterious company called Mega Joy -- an N64 controller that contained 50-odd Nintendo games. The Register has details. [theregister.co.uk]
      A friend of mine bought this and likes his a lot, although he's not much of a gamer. The Reg mentions them selling for ten pounds in the UK; I think my friend says his was about ~$20.

      It seems you can't buy them any more, of course. There are none listed on eBay, and googling for them some time back didn't turn up anything, so I assume Nintendo burned down the factory producing them, and seeded the ground with salt.


      Quick GOOGLE result for "Meja Joy"
      http://www.paramountzone.com/megajoy.htm

      http://www.gadgets.co.uk/megajoy2.html

      Downside is this blurb - "(This product is not designed to work in the USA or any other country using the NTSC system.)" Sorry, unless you've got a PAL TV set or got a PAL converter (or an old Amiga monitor that can display a PAL signal [hint hint]) I guess you cannot use it.

      Here's a site with a PAL > NTSC converter for $59
      http://www.xbox-online.net/flash/x6c.htm
      (Sorry about it being on a BugBoX website, still at the moment it is the cheapest I've found)

      Another note - DAMN! They have MAPPY on it. I love that cute mouse being chased around by adorable kittens with a delightful tune in the background as they rebound off trampolines to each level.

      One more thing Jackie Chan!
      (Found this in the search)
      http://www.protectv.com/
      Q. How does PROTECTV work?
      A. PROTECTV works through the captioning that runs through television programming, videos, and DVD's. PROTECTV works with both the audio as well as the written captions that are available. Every time an offensive word is spoken it is compared to a dictionary of over 400 words and phrases and if the word or phrase matches, it is deleted from the soundtrack and captioning. The viewer will experience a momentary gap in the audio and for viewers reading the captions, the undesirable written word is replaced by XXXX's.

      (Goes into old lady Jewish mode)
      "Go ahead... discuss."

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    5. Re:Replayability? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Here's a site with a PAL > NTSC converter for $59
      http://www.xbox-online.net/flash/x6c.htm
      (Sorry about it being on a BugBoX website, still at the moment it is the cheapest I've found)

      That still wouldn't work as it doesn't put out a proper 29.97 fps NTSC signal...it's some 25 fps variant that I think is used in some South American countries. It converts the color information to something resembling NTSC (they don't say if it uses 3.58 MHz or 4.43 (?) MHz color burst), but the framerate is unaltered.

      That said, if you have a video-capture or TV-tuner card in your computer, there's a fair chance you can kick it into PAL mode. The machine on which I'm typing this has a generic four-port Bt878-based capture card; playing with one of the unused ports in GraphEdit, the property page for the capture filter had a couple of options for NTSC, maybe a dozen for PAL, and a few for SECAM. IIRC, the All-In-Wonder Radeon in my home system has some similar options.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Replayability? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      That still wouldn't work as it doesn't put out a proper 29.97 fps NTSC signal...it's some 25 fps variant that I think is used in some South American countries. It converts the color information to something resembling NTSC (they don't say if it uses 3.58 MHz or 4.43 (?) MHz color burst), but the framerate is unaltered.

      That said, if you have a video-capture or TV-tuner card in your computer, there's a fair chance you can kick it into PAL mode. The machine on which I'm typing this has a generic four-port Bt878-based capture card; playing with one of the unused ports in GraphEdit, the property page for the capture filter had a couple of options for NTSC, maybe a dozen for PAL, and a few for SECAM. IIRC, the All-In-Wonder Radeon in my home system has some similar options.


      Thanks! I've seen the TV-Tuner cards going for $50. I was going to suggest the APEX DVD player too as that is the "Everything" bit of wonderful hardware that would do the job well.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  16. Portable? by saqmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It'd be cool if someone brought out a colour, handheld Atari system. It wouldn't cost much, I mean, compared to something like the NeoGeo handheld or gameboy.

    Just imagine it, sitting on the train, and people start hearing the classic Asteroids noises coming from your handheld.

    Within minutes everyone will want a go. Nostalgia at it's best!

    --
    "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story..."
    1. Re:Portable? by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what I thought right after I read the article. A small screen would suffice - we're not talking about losing quailty on the graphics :)

      You could probably put a few megs of ROM in it and preload it with just about every Atari game out there.

      The only problems I see are:
      - getting permissions to package the ROM's
      - you'd not want to do it the above way because once you sold one, there is no reason for someone to come back and buy more games from you. So that means some sort of media to swap games in and out, which means more cost.

    2. Re:Portable? by jockm · · Score: 2

      32K! The 6507 (yes you read that right) could only address 4K. Most games were either 4K or 8K (via bank switching).

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
  17. Portable? I think not by galaga79 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a bit deceptive to refer to it as a portable system considering you need to plug it into a TV to actually to use it. By using the word portable I thought something along the lines of Puma the portable Atari 2600 where a Sega Game Gear has been converted into a portable Atari 2600 complete with its own display.

    There is a whole site dedicated to Atari 2600 portable conversion projects that has been discussed in this and repeated in this Slashdot article.

    1. Re:Portable? I think not by PsyQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not a Sega Game Gear, it's a Nomad. The Game Gear was an original system based off Sega's Master System hardware but with a better graphics subsystem (more colors). The Nomad was a complete Sega Mega Drive (Genesis in the US) compressed into a handheld console. It played the original Genesis cartridges without any modification, giving it a library of hundreds of games right at its day of release.

      To some, the Nomad is STILL the best handheld system ever released, because of the varied and deep selection of games.

      Maybe I'm karma-whoring :)

    2. Re:Portable? I think not by RESPAWN · · Score: 2

      That's not a Sega Game Gear, it's a Nomad. The Game Gear was an original system based off Sega's Master System hardware but with a better graphics subsystem (more colors). The Nomad was a complete Sega Mega Drive (Genesis in the US) compressed into a handheld console. It played the original Genesis cartridges without any modification, giving it a library of hundreds of games right at its day of release.



      I was going to correct him until I saw your post. Nice to see that somebody else realized his mistake. However, it is sad to see that this guy converted a Sega Nomad and not a Game Gear. The Nomad really was one of the best portables I've ever played. I purchased one new for $150 after the first christmas they were out, and sold my Game Gear the next day. I already had a Genesis and 4 times as many games for it as my Game Gear. Plus, the Nomad used the same power adapter and RF adapter that the Genesis used, and included a second controller port (really only useful when hooked up to the TV as the built-in screen wasn't meant for two people to view it) so I didn't have to buy any extra peripherals. The only complaint I ever had about the thing was the horrible battery life. I think the most I ever got from the thing was like 3 hours on a set of batteries. This is of course because of the wonderful color, back-lit screen in the Nomad. And despite what others may think, I would never have traded off that great screen for better battery life.


      That said, I still can't believe this guy hacked up a Nomad to build this thing. The Nomad is a relatively rare piece of hardware and can still command a decent price. I sold mine a couple of years ago for ~$100. That's not much depreciation for the video game world. Then again, mine was still in pristine condition, complete with orgianl packaging, including twist ties and plastic bags, and the original receipt of purchase. I take care of my stuff. But I digress...


      In fact, I'm not even sure what the purpose of this post was...

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    3. Re:Portable? I think not by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

      Ben is cool. I hung out with him a lot at least year's Classic Gaming Expo. The portable 2600s were cool, and I love the way you can 'link' them for two-player games like Combat.

      Now if only Infogrames or JAKKS would hire this guy, we'd have a REAL retro system to stick in our pockets.

      (Of course, I've got Stella on my Zaurus, but it's not quite the same.)

  18. I name one. by Karoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Moon Patrol.

    More (screenshots etc) here:
    http://www.atariage.com/software_page.html? Softwar eID=1159

    --
    Don't answer me. Moderate. Slashdot is about moderation, not discussion.
  19. What, again? by lightspawn · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is just like the Activision/Toymax dealie from last year.


    Why can't I have one with _ALL_ the commercially released games? Connected to some compactflash card or whatever? Think about how much space your old atari carts are taking up. And those 5 million E.T. carts in the landfill.


    Same goes for NES, SNES, SMS, Genesis, and PCE and I'm set for life.


    Sorry, it's late/early and I'm rambling.

    1. Re:What, again? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      I was going to say I saw something like this last year...I can't believe this warrants a story. Yeah, it's neat, but in my opinion, there is MORE interesting stuff out there worth posting. It is cool, but call me when they get the whole library on one unit. It IS possible.

      --

      Gorkman

  20. Re:The point being? by lightspawn · · Score: 2
    if it comes with pit-fall i'd pay 20 bux to be able to plug into an rca jack anywhere and play.. it's fun..


    Yeah, the toymax unit I mentioned earlier comes with 10 activision games, one of which is pitfall. You may find it for $20, maybe even less.

  21. Re:The point being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok,

    How about parents with younger children, who don't want to spend much on something that will probably get broken fairly quickly.

    It retricts the kids to playing it on the TV which allows for greater control over it's usage than say a GameBoy which they can sit anywhere out of sight with.

    The games relied on gameplay rather than complicated plots, much easier for a younger child to master, take 2 young children. Explain to one how to play space invaders, try and explain to the other how to organise the members of thier team in Dungeon Siege and the benefits of +x modifiers and don't forget to keep the 4 or 5 health bars on the left of the screen up...

    Just because you do not play with duplo bricks, it does not mean there is no market for such a product.

  22. Re:Lost youth.... by birder · · Score: 2

    Must of been a hella big pile. Those cartridges cost upwards of $100 at least when they came out. I remember years later in a department store seeing the same game for $1.99.

  23. Mega Joy 2 is PAL Only by nuxx · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately the Mega Joy 2 seems to be PAL only. A converter would help, but it'd be nice to just take it anywhere and plug it in.

    -Steve

  24. What would really be cool.. by glh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is if you could somehow download new ROMS to the joystick. Perhaps even the ROMS that are out there on the internet. I wonder if someone could easily hack one of these things to do that? It'd be nice to see some hardware specs.

  25. Thinkgeek by Ratface · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is something that would *so* fit ThinkGeek's product line. I hope someone from there keeps an eye on the status of this product and gets them in stock when they are finally availabe.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Thinkgeek by gosand · · Score: 2
      This is something that would *so* fit ThinkGeek's product line.

      Exept they would charge $29.99 for it. :-)

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  26. Re:Innovative.. by troc · · Score: 2

    I still have one ;)

    I works some of the time but is a little bit flakey. It has tennis, squash, hockey and breakout.

    For a really authentic time I can even tape some coloured cellophane to the screen to get coloured bricks in breakout ;)

    heh

    John

    --
    Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  27. Re:The point being? by Peyna · · Score: 2

    That doesn't have mean more than 1... he could have had 1, dumped her, and that's been it =]

    --
    What?
  28. Re:Hmm cool by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

    I'll pony up the $20 ...

    ... you ment the game pad, though if they have a hit this X-mas with it, the stocks currently at a good price to.

    The debate, game for $20, share of stock for $17 ...

    --
    TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  29. Atari haiku. by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Atari still lives!
    Oh how I miss those arcades.
    Now bring back pinball!

  30. Proof for MAME Critics by robbway · · Score: 2

    This device, however inferior it may be to current game systems, proves that the MAME Critics are justified in their complaints. There is a commercial market for old ROMS. As long as the sales value of these ROMS is above zero, copying unlicensed ROMS, like those for ATARI, is stealing. Okay, maybe each one is about $1.00, but it's still theft, and now it's objectively quantified.

    1. Re:Proof for MAME Critics by vidarh · · Score: 2

      There may be a commercial market, but my guess is that a pretty high percentage of their customers will be people that want it because they love playing old games, and are likely using MAME or other emulators as well.

  31. And for those of you who can't wait... by uberdood · · Score: 2

    There's already a similar system out there.

    Just go to 9the Tee and look at their Arcade Video Game System - complete with two controllers, a light gun, and 76 built-in games. $36.95 Sure, it won't fit in your pocket, but still...

    --
    "Population 1,656"
  32. Re:Atari Joysticks by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

    Ergo be damned, I miss the Atari and (blast from the past) Wico joysticks of old. They withstood my lower-middle-class whiteboy-in-an-ethnic-neighborhood angst, plowing photon torpedos against the Krylons in Star Raiders.

    Krylons? The evil overlords of paint?

    At any rate, while the Atari 2600 joysticks were nearly indestructible, they weren't my favorite. The best joystick ever invented (and I've yet to find it's equal anywhere in the land of PC or console) was the Epyx 500XJ. Ergonomic, gave solid feedback with it's switches and was durable too.

  33. A C64 Version would be cool by Te1waz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't suppose this will see the shores of Europe any time soon. We're still waiting the SL-5500 (I'm glad I got mine while over on business).

    A C64 version would be cool though, it'd actually be an improvement over the original as we wouldn't have to wait for the loading time (unless we want to lisiten to the often groovy loading music (Ocean) or pretend we're being interrogated by watching a Mutant Camels loader.

    Please, please don't brain wash me MR. Torturer...

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  34. I've already seen this on the market by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    I've seen this about 6 months ago at a BJ's warehouse in CT (USA).

    *shrug*

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  35. I remember seeing an NES one. by NiGHTSFTP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, there is a "portable NES" that hooks up to your TV. It looks like a controller.

    Difference: 100 some odd more games.

    It is also ~$60 or something like that.

    I saw it on QVC a few months ago, and it may have been on HSN. I wonder how easy it would be to turn one into a portable. (since its in seeming wide availability, and is small...)

    Oh, back on topic, Pic of the "portable" atari: http://www.qvc.com/img/E/41/E29241.jpg

    --
    http://www.angryburrito.com/ The best, completely unfinished software review site ever.
  36. Re:Atari makes nice arcade machines by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    I really liked Stun Runner. The starter's voice was sexy.

    Atari Games was a different company than Atari Corp. They had no relation at all.

  37. Trademark City by christurkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are enough trademarks in that story to gag the most jaded lawyer!

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  38. Re:Atari Joysticks by jkujawa · · Score: 2

    The 500XJ was the only piece of hardware I've ever owned with a five-year warranty. Telling. I wish everything were built that well.

  39. Re:Your attitude sucks by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

    >It's piratanical trolls like you that killed Atari the first time!

    ??? so my debate on buying the product or investing in the company is evil because I pay for software and invest in that software model, maybe you should re-read what I stated.

    Atari is getting royalties of of this, and it was the attempt to live off of the 2600 and not investing in new console technology that killed them the first time ...

    btw. at $20 I will be buying one ... as for stock, I do feel this could be a sleeper, but need to research it first.

    The software model I use is, you buy our instrument, it acts as your software key, so we give you the latest software (of course our hardware 'keys' are between $5K and $200K depending on model).

    --
    TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  40. Finding Atari Joysticks by Argyle · · Score: 2

    The offical model number for the joysticks is CX40.

    You can ususally track them down on eBay or via google.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  41. I bought several in Taiwan by John+Harrison · · Score: 2
    At the Taipei night market these things are all over. I bought one for $20. You can get a single controller with about 80 games in it for about $5. The contoller has a cartridge slot on the bottom so you can plug in additional cartridges. Did I mention that it is an NES and not a 2600? Well, neither did you.


    I bought a bunch back to the states for Christmas. It was a VERY cheap way to entertain my entire family. My mom has become a Tetris freak, challenging all comers to head to head matches.

  42. Combat... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2

    This sounds sort of neat, except that Combat won't be nearly as cool if it's single-player only.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  43. Re:Who will buy it? by ProlificSage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those who remember coming home from school and ignoring our homework to see how many times we could flip Asteroids before supper.

    Those who remember having to mow two lawns to afford to buy Missile Command

    Those who despise today's multi-function "game controllers" and long for the day of a one button joystick

    Those who now have the cash to buy all the games they could never afford as kids.

    That, IMHO, is who will buy it.

    --
    Real software engineers regret the existence of COBOL, FORTRAN and BASIC.
  44. Re:Lynx games & resources by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Funny
    • As a Lynx owner myself, I can reccomend The GOAT (Games Of All Types) Store [goatstore.com].
    The only way I'd touch a link to "Goatstore" on Slashdot would be with lynx from the command line...
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  45. A Place to buy new 2600 Joysticks! by Yoda2 · · Score: 2

    You can buy new 2600 joysticks (and a bunch of other great stuff) here. I bought two and have been very happy with them.

  46. Genesis pads work in VCS by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Both joysticks for my 2600 are pretty much dead

    Joypads designed for the Sega Genesis console will work in an Atari 2600 console.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Genesis pads work in VCS by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

      Joypads designed for the Sega Genesis console will work in an Atari 2600 console.

      A few years ago I wrote a game for the Atari 8-bit computer (400/800/XL/XE) which can take advantage of the two buttons the Atari can easily read off a Genesis controller.

      I actually ported it to Linux/Windows. :)

  47. Why is this being covered? by British · · Score: 2

    I don't get why this is newsworthy when "x games in a controller" have been out for a while, and the price cut with the PS2 and Xbox doesn't get a story. Yay!

  48. Adventure? by DrCode · · Score: 2

    Must be a different game than the one I'm thinking with. It'd be difficult to type 'xyzzy' with just a joystick.

    1. Re:Adventure? by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

      Adventure for the 2600 was the first game with an easter egg. It was also based on the text-based Adventure game, but turned graphical (if you could call those graphics).

      It's also still one of my all-time favorite games on the 2600. The bat just PISSES me off in games 2 and 3. :)

      One of these days I'm going to make a proper Adventure update/clone for Linux/Windows/MacOS.
      (Thank you, Sam Lantinga!)

  49. Re:What a ripoff! by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    There is the small issue of licensing. It's one thing to d/l all those ROM images off the net for your private grins, but another to burn them into a device and sell it.

    But hey, you have my personal permission (not that it has any legal standing) to play all the Wall Ball you want.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  50. Re:Lynx games & resources by red5 · · Score: 2

    As a Lynx owner myself, I can reccomend The GOAT (Games Of All Types) Store [goatstore.com]. Decent prices and an OK selection, and customer service is great; they sent me a second free game because I screwed up my address on the order form the first time. And, they ship internationally

    Thanks I'll check them out.

    But stay away from Hydra and Batman Returns; big stinkers there

    Too late. But thanks anyhow.

    You might also try GameDude [gamedude.com]; you can buy & sell cartridges from old systems through them, and they're in California, so shipping to BC should be fairly quick. Haven't done business with them in a while, but they were easy to deal with.

    I used to go there it's like an hours drive from where I live and I don't drive.

    Thanks for all the links

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  51. Re:Atari makes nice arcade machines by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

    Atari Games was a different company than Atari Corp. They had no relation at all.

    Well, not quite "not at all." I mean, STUN Runner was licensed by Atari Games and released for Atari Corp's "Atari Lynx" handheld, for example.

  52. Amiga was really an Atari by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

    I'm a huge Atari fan (own a 2600, 2600 Jr, two Jaguars, two Lynxes, a 1200XL, an 800XL and an 800), but honestly, I never liked the ST.

    The Amiga was MUCH more impressive to me. I still want to get a 500 or 1000 one of these days.

    One of the things not many people know is that the Amiga was actually designed by a lot of the same people who designed the 2600 and/or 400/800, and some of whom went on to design the Lynx.

    They share a lot of the same nifty architecture. (Atari 800's "Display List Interrupt" was just the early version of Amiga's "Copper"... and the Atari Lynx has the same feature, though I don't know if it has a specific name)

    Atari ST was pretty much Tramiel's idea which he brought over when he moved from Commodore to Atari.

    Weird, no?

    1. Re:Amiga was really an Atari by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      The Amiga was MUCH more impressive to me. I still want to get a 500 or 1000 one of these days.


      write me man - I can help you there.

  53. Re:why not 5200? by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

    The 5200 was just an 800 whose memory map got stuck in a blender, the OS yanked, and the controller turned into an easily broken analog piece of crap. :) There were also not very many games.

    I'd like to see an 800/XL/XE portable. :)

    Atari800 on my Zaurus will suffice for now. ;)

    (Ooh, or maybe a 7800!)

  54. Re:Atari Joysticks by KILNA · · Score: 2

    I got on a nostalgia kick after reading this story and found a great site for Star Raiders. You, sir, are correct. I bow to your superior recollection.

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  55. Re:just 10?? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

    Ten K!? Son, back in the day we worked in 4K (and the poor sods at Atari did the early games in 2K). The 128 bytes of RAM made things interesting too.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  56. Re:How to play downloaded ROMs on actual 2600 syst by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    Well, I know a guy who built a card that rode inside an Apple II, with a ribbon cable and stub card-edge connector. The cart images lived on a floppy and were loaded into the RAM on the card, then a soft toggle switch (a write to $C000 or somesuch -- it's been quite a while) allowed the Atari to see the RAM as its own ROM. We used them for development, but we also surveyed the competition's work.

    Of course, youi'd have to have a II+ kicking around...

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  57. Re:A C64 Version would be cool by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey, that one was made ages ago: Commodore Executive 64 (SX64/DX64). =)

    (Though neither had Datassette port, and I'm not sure about cartridge support - but on C64, floppy loading times were never Utterly Horrible (especially with disk turbo), even if they're slow by today's standards...)

    (Oh, and getting a SX64/DX64 is a bit hard. An used laptop, a Linux install and VICE would probably be cheaper =)

  58. Re:Lost youth.... by birder · · Score: 2

    I specifically remember asteroids cost over $100 when it was released. Only one friend, who's father was a doctor, could afford it. There were others.

    This was $100 Canadian, in the late 70s.

  59. Re:Atari Joysticks by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    The 500XJ was my favorite joystick of the era, but the stick seemed to have an awful tendency to break just above where the metal inside ended. My friends and I went through several of them when we discovered Activision Decathlon on the C64, so the frantic back-and-forth motion to run in that game may have played a part in the plastic's fatigue and eventual failure.

    I have a pair of NES 500XJ's as well, but for the real nostalgia-inducing times, you really have to use the original, boxy NES joypads (ergonomics? what's that?).

    God, I miss Epyx. So many afternoons spent after school playing their games.... [sigh]

    ~Philly

  60. Re:How to play downloaded ROMs on actual 2600 syst by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    Actually, there was an acoustic device, the name of which escapes me. The Something Charger, maybe?

    It was going to be the Next Big Thing, downloading games over the phone into your Atari. It ended up being a niche product for fanatics.

    We were developing, so the Apple was our host platform. Assemble the code into that stretch of RAM, flip the soft switch, and watch it fly -- or crash. The audio part would have been painful.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander