Slashdot Mirror


Verisign Ordered to Stop Deceptive Renewal Notices

Ummagumma writes: "CNN is running a story on how the courts have ordered Verisign to stop their deceptive 'renewal notices' to other registrars' customers. I've gotten a couple of these, and was smart enough to figure out what's going on, but this is a dirty practice, of borderline legality. Let's hope they get smacked down hard for this one..."

21 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Contracts and deception by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Contracts signed under deceptive circumstances are not and should not valid. This is why there is a clause in most contract that states 'I have read and understood this contract' or something to this effect.

    1. Re:Contracts and deception by Surak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, even without that, contract law requires a 'meeting of the minds.' There must be a mutual understanding about the contract. Without that, any contract, signed or not, is null and void. IANAL.

  2. About Time! by zpengo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In any other industry, this would obviously be recognized as illegal client poaching, but as with so many other things, it gets overlooked or misunderstood because it has to do with the Internet.

    These are neither new nor complicated issues; There are precedents for all of them in the non-Internet realm -- but it's been taking judges and lawyers a long time to realize that.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:About Time! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but as with so many other things, it gets overlooked or misunderstood because it has to do with the Internet.

      What are you talking about? What part of "U.S. District Court Judge Frederic N. Smalkin agreed with BulkRegister, saying that VeriSign likely engaged in deceptive behavior" didn't you understand?

      Verisign broke the law. People complained. Someone sued. Verisign lost. Sounds just like any other industry to me.

    2. Re:About Time! by grytpype · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would really be a hoot if the judge ordered Verisign to contact everyone they sent the fraudulent renewal notices to, and tell them that (1) Verisign is not their registrar, (2) they do not need to renew with Verisign. That would cost Verisign money, and would further depress their reputation among customers.

      --

      - Have a picture

  3. Advertising Dollars by shuffle40 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Verisign is going to spend this sort of money on advertising (I don't know how many of these letters get sent out - but I got one, and only own three domain names) , why not use it to really attract customers rather than piss them off? I mean, make those advertising dollars count! I can think of many ways to add value to the domain registration service - provide limited web / ftp / mail space included in the price, combined offers for books, hardware, etc. with vendors... Sure it takes an investment to do this - but why else are people going to choose one registrar over another? Looks like domain reg. companies are basically attempting snail mail spam... It's on par with the deception in the spam messages you get from "long lost friends" or messages that appear reputable but send you to the animal whorehouses. Looks like one more item, like spam, that doesn't even make it to be read... Way to go Verisign. Will you be spamming electronically next?

  4. BulkRegister's Involvement by matthew.thompson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Today I received a message from Bulkregister about this as it would appear to be because ofthem that Verisign are restricted by this injunction.

    Bulkregister are collecting evidence for the forthcoming trial from Bulkregister members - if you're a member send you details including BR membership number to injunction@bulkregister.com

    They may require a fax copy or affidavit but personally I think that it's worth it to show Verisign what we think.

    I'm not connected with BulkRegister in any way other than being a satisfied customer of their.

    M@t :o)

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    1. Re:BulkRegister's Involvement by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny, I'm not presently a BulkRegister customer, but I received a similar e-mail, the gist of which was that I should ignore Verisign's deceptive advertising and instead re-register with BulkRegister. Peculiar that I didn't receive anything from Verisign about this...

      Looks to me like BulkRegister is taking advantage of the situation to do their own slightly-less-than-legal advertising. The world of big business sucks.

      ::Colz Grigor

  5. Business Ethics (or lack therof) by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its things like this that make me think a whole overhaul of business schools and other institutions of higher learning is needed. I think things like this have always gone on, but they seem a lot more nasty and prevalent now.

    All this crap probably started when Business schools starting using military strategy and Machiavellian philosopy as the ultimate way to win a war with business competition. So in the light of the "ends justify the means", now we have business practices by those who only want their company to win, and they don't care how they do it. Hence my comment about ethics. What goes around comes around, and eventually the entire business world is even more backstabbing and evil than it was before. If its taught in school that this behavior leads to this damage in the system, or the students experience it first hand, perhaps things like this would not happen any more.

    All that being said, I'm glad to see that the Law in place to prevent this un-ethical behavior has been used as it was meant to, to stop this sort of unethical behavior. I'd still rather see the solution to the problem be stopping the problem before it occurs, rather than correcting the behavior after the action has been done.

    --
    -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    1. Re:Business Ethics (or lack therof) by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I couldnt agree more. I know at my school (Drexel), business students are not required an ethics course, but engineering students are (req'd for accredidation), as well as other majors (accredidation again).

      As a side note, the original judge in the MS anti-trust case has said he feels Microsoft would not be where they are today (a monopoly found guilty of anti-trust) had Bill Gates finished college. He apparently never took an ethics course required by Harvard.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Business Ethics (or lack therof) by Software · · Score: 3, Interesting
      All this crap probably started when Business schools starting using military strategy and Machiavellian philosopy as the ultimate way to win a war with business competition.
      No, all this crap probably started around the dawn of time. Deceptive people have been doing shady business practices for thousands of years before there were business schools. Does the phrase let the cat out of the bag ring any bells? These practices are not more prevalent now, but they are better publicized.

      I surmise that you have never been to business school. I am currently getting my MBA. We don't learn many Machiavellian techniques. We learn mostly accounting, finance, some law, and some basic computer information. Pretty standard stuff so that you don't drive a company into the ground. We don't talk about how to get ahead by being the most slimy. Should we? By the time you've reached about 30 (the average age at my school), you're either an ethical person or you're not. I doubt a one-semester course is going to change you much. An ethics class in high school, or perhaps a religious upbringing, would likely have a much greater effect.

      I agree with your third paragraph, but your first two are mindless ranting.

    3. Re:Business Ethics (or lack therof) by jafac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow! I just realized that I was never required to take an ethics course for my Art degree!

      Think of all those muderous filthy greedy backstabbing artists out there!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  6. Re:deceptive 'renewal notices' by matthew.thompson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes but PC Magazine doesn't email you to tell you that your Computer Shopper subscription is almost up and that you should renew to "a magazine" through them.

    Verisign are attempting to get people not to renew but to transfer - that there is a one year extension to the domain's registry period is purely a function of being an TCANN accredited registry.

    They're using a feature of the system to try and get customers back by deception - that stinks.

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  7. See for yourself. by nobodyman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pardon the whoring, but Go Daddy has posted a copy of the notice that Verisign sent out. It does seem fairly shady.

  8. I got taken by Verisign... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a domain hosted by a company in india which registered the domain for me for 2 years. After a year, I transferred to a hosting company in the US. When the second year was up, I was thinking that I need to track down who the registrar is and renew, when I got a verisign e-mail saying I need to renew. Thinking that was convenient enough, I renewed with them. About a week after I did this I started to see all the articles on slashdot about domain slamming. I looked through some records and realized that Verisign was not my original registrar and they grifted me good, like Homer and the Cooders. I'd like to say I was beaten by the best, but...

  9. It feels so good to break away from Verisign by twfry · · Score: 3, Informative
    I had my domain registered with Verisign for about 4 years and in that time I learned what a crappy company they are. I would get bills from them without warning for around $4 for ramdom "services" which I never signed up for. Worst of all it was impossible to get someone on the phone to correct problems. No joke, twice I've been on hold with them for 1+ hours only to be disconnected.

    The final straw for me was when I received a mailing from them advertising discount renewal rates. The only thing was that they were bogus. After spending lots of time on their website and email customer service, I releaized it wasn't going to happen.

    So I switched to directnic. They're cheap, and the FAQ pages do an excelent job of explaining the domain transfew process which was a concern. So some other place out and get Verisign off of you back too. :)

  10. A way to kill verisign by acroyear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Verisign is, by offering the 9-year plan, making similar mistakes to IBM when they sold instead of leased their mainframe hardware.

    So if everybody (who is a Verisign customer), were to go ahead and buy for 9 years, Verisign would actually see a good profit this year, then work that profit direction into future plans' budgets, only to have them fail utterly because nobody would be buying anything from them the next 3-8 years...

    Stock prices would drop. Execs would be canned. Heads would roll...

    "My God, it would be beautiful..."

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  11. VeriSign's even sleazier day was... by afflatus_com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..when they sold the email addresses of all their domain holders to the spammers (and spammers since they are of questionable legality then sold cheap knockoffs of the CDs to other spammers). Since the internic database of actual email addresses that their customers were using to be informed of changes/renewal notices to their domain names with them, it was an especially sleaze thing to do. I am glad that justice was delivered this time.

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  12. I got one of these yesterday by Elkman · · Score: 5, Informative
    I got a "renewal" notice yesterday for two domains I have registered through register.com. I knew it was deceptive, but here's the interesting part: They apparently cross-referenced the name and address on those domains to the name and address of a domain I do have registered through VeriSign, and printed on the address: "Domain Administrator: (name of the organization registered through VeriSign)". However, the domains listed on the form were the ones I have registered through register.com.

    So, in other words, this little "renewal" notice made it appear like it was time for me to renew the domain registered through VeriSign, even though I really would have been transfering two other domains instead.

    VeriSign is evil and deserves to die. Apparently, their product can't compete on its own merits any more; they have to resort to deception to sell it.

  13. ICANN / VeriSign by poger67 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Besides the deceptive fake billing notices from VeriSign and other (American Registry?), VeriSign employs a few other sleezy tactics.

    I use OpenSRS for all my registrations, and one of my customers just lost control of his domain name to VeriSign (who also stripped his e-mail, name and company name off of the domain record - and when he called VeriSign they denied any knowledge of them having the domain in their system - even though whois clearly showed it!) Anway, someone in his office paid the "invoice", thus initiating the transfer. The real registrar (OpenSRS) sends out an e-mail to the admin contact notifiying him of the transfer and providing a link and a password to approve the transfer. Unfortunately, ICANN rules state that if you do nothing in 5 days (i.e. specifically deny the transfer), that lack of action in 5 days counts as an acknowledgement to approve the transfer! Bang - bye bye domain name.

    Another customer got his renewl notice from VeriSign (a legit one), paid it via credit card, and 4 days AFTER he paid it, VeriSign sold his name to a company in Taiwan. Now VeriSign is telling him there's no way to get the domain back. Argh..

    And my final vent on VeriSign. I was watching a domian that expired in March 2000 on their system. I had opened up 3 separate trouble tickets with VeriSign in an attempt to get them to release the domain so I could buy it. Not once did I ever get a response back on one of my trouble tickets. I checked the domain for release almost every day - until one day I see that's it's now owned by a company in Taiwan who is just simply reselling it now for $1500.

  14. If you got one of these... by D_Nebuchadnezzar · · Score: 5, Informative
    What Verisign did was fraud... Fraud, Fraud, Fraud! They sent out "Domain Name Renewal Notices" -- a bill, and it can be infered that it is expected for you to pay.

    Take 5 minutes, right now, and fill out complaint forms on the following websites:
    1. BBB.org
    2. FTC
    3. USPS Post Master [usps.com]
    Tell these agencies what you received. Send a message to Verisign that we will not put up with this bull crap