Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.0.1 Ships

Andreas "Dre" Pour writes "Short on the heels of the remarkably successful launch of the KDE 3 series with a very stable and complete KDE 3.0 last month, the KDE Project has announced the immediate availability of KDE 3.0.1. While primarily a translation release, it also squashes some bugs, including some minor security issues with the HTML engine. Read the (relatively short) announcement and the fairly complete ChangeLog for more info. Binary packages are already available from the stalwart KDE packagers at Compaq Tru64, Conectiva Linux, Mandrake Linux and SuSE Linux. As always, we hope you enjoy the latest and greatest KDE!"

9 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. Re:GCC3 Support? by Ween · · Score: 5, Informative

    and to reply to my own post, here it is from the announcement

    KDE will not compile properly with gcc versions earlier than gcc-2.95, such as egcs-1.1.2 or gcc-2.7.2, or with unpatched versions of gcc 3.0.x. However, KDE should compile properly with gcc 3.1

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
  2. Re:Modular solution by ViXX0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good gawd no!

    The KDE KHTML part is small, efficient and awesome. The Mozilla engine is big and cumbersome.

    There are people on the KDE team that know the KHTML part inside out, to use Mozilla, they'd have to learn the internals of that if they wanted to make changes.

    I say stay with KHTML. One of the goals of OSS is to allow choice. If you want to use Mozilla in KDE, use it. Or you can use the included one built on KHTML.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  3. Forget about Dre... by Nailer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Andreas "Dre" Pour writes ...

    Its nice to see this kind of thing on Slashdot. Now days everybody talks like they've got something to say, but nothing comes out when they move their lips, just a bunch of gibberish and motherf**kers act like they forgot about Dre...

  4. Re:KDE slow? by cxvx · · Score: 5, Informative
    No, it does that automatically. Here are the instructions I followed (found on gentoo mailiglist), they are targetted for the gentoo distro, but you could follow similar steps on any system:
    --------

    The install: (important parts marked with *)
    ===========
    1) set up Gentoo 1.1a w/stage3 per install docs
    2) installed kernel-2.4.19-r4, preempt, lowlatency
    3) *important: merged binutils-2.12+ in order to take advantage of combreloc (but built kernel with 2.11 beforehand just to be safe)
    4) *USE flags="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" Many people use a lot of crazy optimizations, but the only one to me that makes a noticable difference in "feel" is -fomit-frame-pointer, and I don't need to debug my system so its all good.
    4) *rebuilt glibc with new binutils installed
    5) finish install per docs. (I use metalog, and lilo instead of grub)
    6) reboot
    7) use hdparm to make sure DMA is enabled
    8) you now have a Gentoo system ready to build apps with the combreloc tweak (you can test this by running apps with 'LD_DEBUG=statistics' and checking the relocations)
    9) build X, kdebase, kdenetwork, mozilla, vim, etc... (doesn't matter)
    10) *add fam to start on boot (allows KDE to track files quicker)
    11) *add your hostname to /etc/hosts (if it's not already there)

    After doing all of this, I can notice a HUGE difference in speed. KDE is very very fast..apps pop up instantly, and it is no less stable then before. Konqueror is definately faster than IE6 on Win2k..just amazing! Overall, I would give KDE3 a 95% stability rating.

    Anyways, I'm just sharing my experience. You may or may not have the same results, email me if you have questions. Remember that reiserfs has been known to cause corruption for some, and the binutils-2.12 is considered experimental, but for me it's been all good so far.

    ------------------
    --
    If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  5. Re:KDE Myths by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative

    [... Huge KDE Myths rant ...]

    Hey, looks like you feel really strongly about this. Can I give you a little advice?

    Try to go out more. Talk to people. Try to talk about something other than computers. Listen to what other people have to say.

    Play some sport. Take up a hobby that's not related to computers. Try taking an interest in girls.

    Relax. Have fun. Don't worry.

    Forget about KDE and Gnome. They're not as important as you think.

  6. Ohmygod... by plaa · · Score: 5, Funny
    The KDE Project Ships the Third-Generation of the Leading Desktop for Linux/UNIX, Offering Enterprises, Governments, Schools, and Businesses an Outstanding Free and Open Desktop Solution


    Whatever happened to the good old way of announcing open-source software??
    --

    I doubt, therefore I may be.
  7. KDELook.org by Foxman98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those of you who are not aware of this site, www.kde-look.org is a great site for all kinds of themes, icons and backgrounds. Check out some of the work there, especially mosfet's liquid theme and the crystal ikons.

    --
    S.t.e.v.e.
  8. Important KMail fix by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Informative
    # kmail: Don't eat in some cases the whole folder, when moving messages between IMAP folders.

    This is one that I noticed on the KMail homepage. If you use KMail with IMAP then please please upgrade for your own sake, or else massive dataloss could occur! I'm not sure how the KMail team let this one slip past, but it's a pretty important fix.

  9. One to ponder by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    • I grudge paying money for Microsoft products, I'm constantly disappointed when they fall short of my expectations, and when they roll out the regular fixes for products that had been billed as the most stable ever, I grunt in annoyance.
    • I buy boxed Linux distros even though I don't have to, I'm constantly delighted when they surpass my expecations, and when they roll out the regular fixes for products that had been billed as the most stable ever, I go "Yippee! Now it's even better!".

    We've been debating what it is Microsoft fears about open source. It's probably not the money (in the mid term) and I'm not even sure that it's the pressure to open their source (in the short term). Right now, the big different for me as a consumer is that I feel good about buying and upgrading Linux based distros. It actually makes me happy. The last time Microsoft made me feel even vaguely like that was with Windows 3.1

    I wonder if what they fear is that they've dug themselves into a position (with software as a service active for business and threatened for consumers) where they can't persuade people to pay them more money voluntarily, and instead they have to go down the slippery slope of coercing and compelling. That can't be a good long term prospect for them.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.