Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.0.1 Ships

Andreas "Dre" Pour writes "Short on the heels of the remarkably successful launch of the KDE 3 series with a very stable and complete KDE 3.0 last month, the KDE Project has announced the immediate availability of KDE 3.0.1. While primarily a translation release, it also squashes some bugs, including some minor security issues with the HTML engine. Read the (relatively short) announcement and the fairly complete ChangeLog for more info. Binary packages are already available from the stalwart KDE packagers at Compaq Tru64, Conectiva Linux, Mandrake Linux and SuSE Linux. As always, we hope you enjoy the latest and greatest KDE!"

48 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. Re:GCC3 Support? by Ween · · Score: 5, Informative

    and to reply to my own post, here it is from the announcement

    KDE will not compile properly with gcc versions earlier than gcc-2.95, such as egcs-1.1.2 or gcc-2.7.2, or with unpatched versions of gcc 3.0.x. However, KDE should compile properly with gcc 3.1

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
  2. Re:KDE by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 3, Informative

    KDE 3 (as well as XFree 4.2) is not going into Debian at least until Woody is released. In addition, Debian will be switching to using GCC 3.1 as the main compiler after Woody, so you'll probably have to wait for that to happen as well.

    Until then, use the unofficial debs in the post immediately above. Note that there are several packages (such as kdegames and kdeartwork) which are not included, as calc is not their maintainer (I wish he were - I miss the 'Glow' window theme and 'Shisen-Sho' :) )

  3. OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the OpenBSD project is now part of the game, e.g.,
    the update of various ports to kde 3.0.1 will be committed
    today, thanks to advance access to the tarballs from the
    kde guys. Thanks a lot !

    --
    Marc Espie

  4. KDE rocks hard! by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Troll
    Down at the lab we of course use Linux for all our servers and workstations. It provides the power we need at an affordable prices[1]. Obviously we could never be a cool futuristic lab while running on the CLI, so we shopped around for a GUI that would give us much-needed features like metal themes and the ability to add Star Trek wav files to desktop activities.

    We found KDE and have never been happier since. And the stability rivals that of Tru64, AIX, VMS or any of the other "big iron" OS's.

    [1]Well, the admins are a little pricey. But they earn every penny of it.

  5. For those looking for new Features by nervlord1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wait untill 3.1 before getting all those sexy new features u know u want ;p, kde 3.1 has tabbed browsing support in konqueror, and a few other nifty enhancments, but for those wanting a stable kde release, this is getting pretty stable.

    Nerv

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
  6. Re:Modular solution by ViXX0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good gawd no!

    The KDE KHTML part is small, efficient and awesome. The Mozilla engine is big and cumbersome.

    There are people on the KDE team that know the KHTML part inside out, to use Mozilla, they'd have to learn the internals of that if they wanted to make changes.

    I say stay with KHTML. One of the goals of OSS is to allow choice. If you want to use Mozilla in KDE, use it. Or you can use the included one built on KHTML.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  7. Re:Modular solution by TheICEBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually the reason for Konqueror and KHTML is the really tight integration of the system components and IO substructure of KDE.
    KDE has a brilliantly easy to use component technology called KParts, which is good for Desktop use and a equally great (and extremely useful) IO system called KIO, which is used in combination with KHTML and KJS (the JavaScript engine) to make Konqueror a browser.

    Now it could be basically possible to use Gecko (the HTML/XML/XUL renderer of Mozilla) like they do in Galeon, but honestly when they began writing Konqueror Mozilla just wasn't something useful and there was and is no release quality Gecko port to Qt, which is absolutely required for an integrated browser.
    Now for normal browsing both browsers are greatly useful and I do use both (Mozilla RC2 and Konqueror for KDE 3.0). But honestly to me Konqueror is just more friendly for general work, while I use my Mozilla for netbanking (mostly due to the really insistent browser ID checking of the banking webapp).

    It's all good, all the time
    -Herbal Thought, Dark Angel TV series, brought to u by RandSig

  8. Forget about Dre... by Nailer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Andreas "Dre" Pour writes ...

    Its nice to see this kind of thing on Slashdot. Now days everybody talks like they've got something to say, but nothing comes out when they move their lips, just a bunch of gibberish and motherf**kers act like they forgot about Dre...

  9. Gotta love the marketspeak by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2
    From the press release:
    The KDE Project Ships the Third-Generation of the Leading Desktop for Linux/UNIX, Offering Enterprises, Governments, Schools, and Businesses an Outstanding Free and Open Desktop Solution
    So what exactly is the difference between an Enterprise and a Business?
    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  10. Re:KDE slow? by cxvx · · Score: 5, Informative
    No, it does that automatically. Here are the instructions I followed (found on gentoo mailiglist), they are targetted for the gentoo distro, but you could follow similar steps on any system:
    --------

    The install: (important parts marked with *)
    ===========
    1) set up Gentoo 1.1a w/stage3 per install docs
    2) installed kernel-2.4.19-r4, preempt, lowlatency
    3) *important: merged binutils-2.12+ in order to take advantage of combreloc (but built kernel with 2.11 beforehand just to be safe)
    4) *USE flags="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" Many people use a lot of crazy optimizations, but the only one to me that makes a noticable difference in "feel" is -fomit-frame-pointer, and I don't need to debug my system so its all good.
    4) *rebuilt glibc with new binutils installed
    5) finish install per docs. (I use metalog, and lilo instead of grub)
    6) reboot
    7) use hdparm to make sure DMA is enabled
    8) you now have a Gentoo system ready to build apps with the combreloc tweak (you can test this by running apps with 'LD_DEBUG=statistics' and checking the relocations)
    9) build X, kdebase, kdenetwork, mozilla, vim, etc... (doesn't matter)
    10) *add fam to start on boot (allows KDE to track files quicker)
    11) *add your hostname to /etc/hosts (if it's not already there)

    After doing all of this, I can notice a HUGE difference in speed. KDE is very very fast..apps pop up instantly, and it is no less stable then before. Konqueror is definately faster than IE6 on Win2k..just amazing! Overall, I would give KDE3 a 95% stability rating.

    Anyways, I'm just sharing my experience. You may or may not have the same results, email me if you have questions. Remember that reiserfs has been known to cause corruption for some, and the binutils-2.12 is considered experimental, but for me it's been all good so far.

    ------------------
    --
    If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  11. Re:Debian??? by cxvx · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you really are willing to compile everything from scratch, you should take a look at Gentoo
    It uses a ports based system that automatically resolves all dependencies between packages.

    I once used a linuxfromscratch, but it took to much time to keep up to date/install.

    With gentoo, you barely have to intervene with the install proces: I could do "emerge kde" on a system with nothing installed, and a few hours (ok , almost a day :) later, all the needed libraries, X, ... would be installed

    --
    If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  12. Re:Bigger, better... slower? by birder · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've recently installed a fresh copy of Mandrake 8.2 with KDE 3 on a Celeron 500 notebook (512mb RAM) and I'm quite happy with it.

    It actually boots in the same time as my P4 XP machine and I don't notice any slowness of the UI.

    Compared to KDE 2, it is much improved.

  13. Re:Modular solution by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 2

    Actually you can use Gecko in Konqueror.
    I believe kmozilla is part of kdebindings.
    Install it, and set your preference for html to kmozilla, instead of khtml.

    --
    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  14. Re:KDE Myths by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative

    [... Huge KDE Myths rant ...]

    Hey, looks like you feel really strongly about this. Can I give you a little advice?

    Try to go out more. Talk to people. Try to talk about something other than computers. Listen to what other people have to say.

    Play some sport. Take up a hobby that's not related to computers. Try taking an interest in girls.

    Relax. Have fun. Don't worry.

    Forget about KDE and Gnome. They're not as important as you think.

  15. Re:KDE by Jaldhar · · Score: 3, Informative

    At this point it is the freeze which has held up adding new packages it seems. In the mean time some of the Debian packagers have made their .debs available by other means. Here are the lines for /etc/apt/sources.list:

    Chris Cheney: kdelibs, kdebase, kdenetwork, kdemultimedia, kdegraphics, kdeutils, kdepim
    deb http://www.ping.uio.no/~mortehu/kde-i386 ./

    Ben Burton: kdesdk,kdeaddons,kdetoys,kdeedu,koffice(not there yet)
    deb http://people.debian.org/~bab/kde3 ./

    I assume the other packages are being worked on by their respective maintainers.

  16. Re:stable? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2

    There's something wrong with your setup. I'm still using 2.2.2, and I rarely run in to any problems.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  17. Ohmygod... by plaa · · Score: 5, Funny
    The KDE Project Ships the Third-Generation of the Leading Desktop for Linux/UNIX, Offering Enterprises, Governments, Schools, and Businesses an Outstanding Free and Open Desktop Solution


    Whatever happened to the good old way of announcing open-source software??
    --

    I doubt, therefore I may be.
    1. Re:Ohmygod... by drix · · Score: 2

      I think that's pretty obvious. The more enterprises, governments, schools, and businesses you get to jump on the bandwagon, the greater the chance that an enterprise, government, school, or business will sponsor your efforts and allow you to buy some honest-to-goodness capital goods in return for your hard work. (I know this is something of an anomaly, even heresy, in the free software world, but I assure you--it does happen.) It also means that the quality of the software itself will increase, with faster bugfixes, more features, and higher quality code in general. Call me old fashioned, but I'll trade a press release worth of MBAdoublespeak in return for that any day of the week.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  18. Silver Lining by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    True. I want KDE for my Debian desktops as well. At least when it finally does arrive it will have several months worth of bugfixes and polish. It's a pity that their release freeze came with all of this good stuff just down the road....Gnome 2, Mozilla 1.0, KDE 3.0.x......

    Since Sid (unstable) is the gateway to Testing (Woody about to supplant Potato) it can't even be had from there. The real pisser is that once Woody releases and this all good stuff shows up in Sid it will be wise to wait for it to come to testing(next codename?). The very first truly new bits of software to go in are apt (heh heh!) to be flaky. Oh well, in this context its a GOOD thing that official Debian releases are infrequent.

  19. Re:Redhat Binary? by PacketMaster · · Score: 2

    You most likely won't want to install a SuSE RPM on a RedHat machine as SuSE's filesystem layout is significantly different from RedHat.

    --

    Some people take their .sig way too seriously

  20. KDELook.org by Foxman98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those of you who are not aware of this site, www.kde-look.org is a great site for all kinds of themes, icons and backgrounds. Check out some of the work there, especially mosfet's liquid theme and the crystal ikons.

    --
    S.t.e.v.e.
    1. Re:KDELook.org by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2

      haha, you got a little messed up. Thats 2 different sets of icons. 'crystal icons' by conectiva and iKons by i dunno who. Another good original set is the 'free icons'. Now kde3.0.1 is out, maybe we'll see some of those vector based icons show up too.

      --

      Liberty.

    2. Re:KDELook.org by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2
      Oh, I forgot the most important thing... Sometimes I wish people would make some animated icons for kde3. Yes, they are supported via mng.
      No I don't mean like in win95 PLUS. I mean with mouse over animation as in some VERY cool websites, glowing symbols etc.

      Your desktop could look VERY spiffy with a custom theme+colorset+animated icons. Think dark background, toombraider, glowing aincient runes.

      Does anyone have any cool examples of websites with nice animated buttons?

      --

      Liberty.

  21. Re:KDE by oyenstikker · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have KDE 3.0.5 running on Debian woody. Just check out qt-copy and kde from anon cvs (http://www.kde.org/anoncvs.html), follow the instructions in README.qt-copy, then compile and install cvs as per instructions on kde's page, with --prefix=/usr/local/kde. It plays nicely with KDE 2 from apt.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  22. Re:Binary packages for just about every dist on th by Elbows · · Score: 2, Informative

    Debian is in a freeze right now, trying to get out a new stable release, so don't hold your breath.
    Once the new release is out the kde packages should hit unstable pretty quickly... there are already "unofficial" debs available.

  23. Re:GCC3 Support? by stilborne · · Score: 2, Informative

    i can attest that it does indeed compile properly with gcc versions earlier than gcc-2.95 as i build it daily on a box with egcs 1.1.2. there are no guarentees it will remain compileable with egcs 1.1.2 in the future, though it probably will at least until i upgrade this machine here ;-)

  24. Re:Modular solution by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    environment..

    The difference is that in this case the environment is firmly in userland, and you want this. Otherwise usability can drop. But being firmly in userland gives me choices. I can run konqueror in Enlightment and even in gnome.

    Separation at this level is vital for healthy growth. Any other methodology is poisoned and will wither.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  25. For Debian fans... by proxima · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been casually monitoring the Debian-KDE mailing list (May archive). Apparently the KDE packagers for Debian are working off of 3.0.1, so when they do arrive in official unstable they'll be quite up-to-date.

    Instructions for how to use experimental unofficial packages can be found here. I haven't tried them myself - I'll wait until they appear in unstable. Check out the mailing list to see others' impressions.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:For Debian fans... by Kowh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been using the experimental packages for a week or so and other than having to purge the old KDE packages, they've been just as good as official packages. No problems whatsoever (other than wasting too much time playing with the eye-candy settings).

  26. Re:Just curious... by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    KDE provide their stuff for free.
    KDE didn't take 20+ years to decide security was important.
    KDE's patch fixes the bugs.
    If you, or anyone, finds a bug in KDE anyone with reasonable programming competence could probably fix it.
    People who download software download patches.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  27. Re:RedHat RPM's by mgv · · Score: 2

    Are the KDE 3.0.1 RedHat RPM's out?

    I cant find any - at least not yet.

    Ok, newbie question:

    How do I download all the RedHat RPM's in one go? Its really tedious clicking on all the rpm's in the folder. I'm sure there is a better way.

    Michael

    --
    There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  28. Re:Debian??? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But you need a really fast network connection. Don't try it with a modem.

    There's an install CD, but it puts in only a base system. You still need to download everything else. (Of course, this condition is subject to change without notice.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. Re:Modular solution by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    KHTML and Gecko serve two different purposes actually.

    KHTML = small, light, fast, good at displaying HTML quickly. Ideal for embedding, which is what it's used for.

    Gecko = not so small (though still quite diddy), fast, very good at displaying HTML but also designed for groovy XML stuff like XUL - this adds its own overheads.

    They are both pretty good, though Gecko is light years beyond KHTML in terms of technology. That's okay though, because KHTML does quite a good job of standard web pages and is fast to load/embed, unlike Gecko. KHTML for some reason also looks better on my box, I think it's a fonts issue.

    And finally, if you want you can use the KMozilla bindings to replace KHTML with Gecko - well I say replace, actually unlike Windows KHTML is not required per se for KDE to function, rather an HTML Renderer with the correct KParts interface is. Somebody has wrapped those interfaces around Gecko and the result is a pluggable HTML handler. This is why browser integration with KDE is good (it's not actually specific to a browser/rendering engine) but with Windows it's bad (IE or else).

  30. Important KMail fix by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Informative
    # kmail: Don't eat in some cases the whole folder, when moving messages between IMAP folders.

    This is one that I noticed on the KMail homepage. If you use KMail with IMAP then please please upgrade for your own sake, or else massive dataloss could occur! I'm not sure how the KMail team let this one slip past, but it's a pretty important fix.

  31. Re:RedHat RPM's by Camulus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think when I checked last night Red Hat had the rpms for thier up2date service. I would highly recommend registering with Red Hat (it's free) and you can setup hardware profiles that allow you to use the Red Hat up2date feature for each of your machines. You can access it from the control panel in KDE 3 (i think, on a 2k box right now) it is some where on the K menu. Either way, look around and you will find it. It works great for me. It even updates the kernel on the fly.

  32. Re:RedHat RPM's by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
    I just found them in rawhide - most likely it would be best to rebuild the source rpms (because I don't know how compatible the binary rpms are with RH 7.2 or 7.3).

    Since the main RH site seems slow at the moment, check the mirror sites for rawhide (some sites don't have the directory).

  33. OT: Linux on the desktop by edremy · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I work on a 95% W2K campus, with the remainder being Mac. I've been gently pushing folks here to consider various Unix solutions. I even occasionally joke with my only-slightly-pointy-haired boss about replacing W2K and Office with Linux/OpenOffice whenever MS licensing costs come up.

    I love Linux. I've got the only Linux box here since I don't feel like porting a bunch of CGI Perl I wrote to IIS. But I hear people talk all the time about how Linux is ready for the desktop and that KDE is just as easy as Windows.

    And then I see the above post, and realize just how detached that view is from reality...

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:OT: Linux on the desktop by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

      The post above yours was talking about building KDE from scratch (not to mention that the instructions were for Gentoo, which is an expert-only distribution that builds itself from scratch). This procedure is not for the novice, nor is it even required by the novice.

      Try reading the SuSE quick-start manual sometime, and you'll see your view is not quite as detached from reality as you'd think.

    2. Re:OT: Linux on the desktop by umoto · · Score: 2

      I think you misunderstood. No one has to go through all those steps to set up KDE. These days you can pop in a CD and be running Linux, KDE, and hundreds of applications in a half hour without ever using the command line.

      Those who want to squeeze more speed out of their system go through a process as described above. Eventually, the distribution makers figure out how to achieve the same extra performance, and everyone benefits.

      If it were possible to do the same thing with Windows, lots of people would. I think it would make Bill G jealous, though. Maybe that's the real reason MS won't open their code. ;-)

  34. One to ponder by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    • I grudge paying money for Microsoft products, I'm constantly disappointed when they fall short of my expectations, and when they roll out the regular fixes for products that had been billed as the most stable ever, I grunt in annoyance.
    • I buy boxed Linux distros even though I don't have to, I'm constantly delighted when they surpass my expecations, and when they roll out the regular fixes for products that had been billed as the most stable ever, I go "Yippee! Now it's even better!".

    We've been debating what it is Microsoft fears about open source. It's probably not the money (in the mid term) and I'm not even sure that it's the pressure to open their source (in the short term). Right now, the big different for me as a consumer is that I feel good about buying and upgrading Linux based distros. It actually makes me happy. The last time Microsoft made me feel even vaguely like that was with Windows 3.1

    I wonder if what they fear is that they've dug themselves into a position (with software as a service active for business and threatened for consumers) where they can't persuade people to pay them more money voluntarily, and instead they have to go down the slippery slope of coercing and compelling. That can't be a good long term prospect for them.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  35. A Warning: by aardvaark · · Score: 2

    I just tried installing on my Mandrake 8.2 box, and it rendered my KDE unuseable, and barfed on my system.

    I had a very recent backup, so I forced the installation (using urpmi *.rpm). Perhaps not the brightest thing to do, as it complained quite a bit, but I forced it anyway.

    Anyway, buyer beware. Now I get to sit reading slashdot while I recover my system!!

    Hey Hugo, if you're out there, Mondo covered my ass!! ;-)

    --
    If I had no sense of humor, I would long ago have committed suicide. -Ghandi
  36. Microsoft Mozilla Explorer by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    And finally, if you want you can use the KMozilla bindings to replace KHTML with Gecko - well I say replace, actually unlike Windows KHTML is not required per se for KDE to function, rather an HTML Renderer with the correct KParts interface is.

    You can do the same thing with Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Internet Explorer. IE is just an ActiveX component, and any other component that implements the same interface will work in 98% of cases. For instance, Mozilla ActiveX Control implements all IE interfaces (except for document.all and VBScript) in terms of Gecko. Heck, it even comes with a program that patches IE to use Gecko!

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  37. Re:Binary packages for just about every dist on th by 10Ghz · · Score: 2

    If Debian is in freeze, why do some packages get updated while some are not? Mozilla has been updated several times since KDE3 was released, so has several libraries and apps. So why not KDE?

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  38. Re:question: combining big releases and P2P? by ViXX0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would think, mainly for content control, and abuse of said network.

    Sure, they can post MD5 sums on the website for people to verify them against, but I don't think that many people actually bother doing that. I imagine for safety, I'd probably download from a central server (web page/ftp site) even if such a P2P infrastructure were in place, simply for the fact that I can be reasonably assured that it hasn't been tampered with.

    Additionally I would think it wouldn't be too long before miscreants started finding ways to share their warez on the network as well, giving it a bad name. Of course, we could continually fix the network against such uses, but they'd continually find ways into it. I'd much rather have the [kernel|KDE|gnome|etc.] developers working on their respective projects than on some peer to peer network.

    I know the ftp sites can get fairly flooded, but I started getting KDE 3.0.1 from ftp.kde.org when I first saw the news this morning and got well over 100K/s here in Canada - doesn't seem so bad to me.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  39. Re:KDE slow? by Master+Bait · · Score: 2
    The use of objprelink really, really speeds up the KDE 2 series. Does anyone know if there is support for this in KDE3?

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
  40. Re:Bigger, better... slower? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    The nice thing is that (at least on SuSE) KDE3 is installed along KDE2, so you can still run KDE2 afterwards and can also run KDE2 apps in KDE3.

    Upgrading to KDE3 is probably less risky than upgrading the distro ;-)

  41. Re:tabbed browsing .png by HeUnique · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cannot use it?

    If you're using KDE CVS - press CTRL SHIFT N - now you got another tab, CTRL SHIFT W - closes the tab..

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  42. Re:RedHat RPM's by mgv · · Score: 2

    f you're a gui man/woman, use konqueror! simply browse using ftp and group select with mouse and drag to some folder or the desktop. much more appropriate methinks to use kde to download kde :-)
    Thank you for the tip. That was a much easier way to download 179 files than by clicking on each one. I think that opera had problems with the multiple select for download. Konqueror handles FTP much better.

    Michael

    --
    There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.