Slashdot Mirror


Quartz Extreme Demo Movie

Anonymous Coward writes "The Swedish web site MacNytt has a QuickTime demo of Quartz Extreme (the graphics acceleration technology in the upcoming Mac OS X "Jaguar" release). It is impressive footage, truly impressive. Now I can watch DVDs at a microscopic level!"

30 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Re:/.'d already by BeenaBerry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you think users with poor vision might appreciate being able to zoom their screen?

  2. Downloaded the movie by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Informative
    I downloaded the movie, and you can too! Just go through the main page and select the Swedish equivalent of "Films". It's accessable from there.

    It's pretty damn impressive. I think we've seen yet another advance in GUI technology from Apple.

  3. Mirrors by rgraham · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://members.cox.net/ronin4701/QuartzExtremeTest riktigfil.mov

    http://clem.mscd.edu/~grahamry/QuartzExtremeTest ri ktigfil.mov

    1. Re:Mirrors by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      wow, was that genie effect slow enough? My lombard even doesn't have that much trouble

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  4. Re:are screenshots a thing of the past? by shunnicutt · · Score: 3, Informative

    The blackout of the DVD has nothing to do with the graphics card -- DVDs are blacked out to prevent people from infringing copyrighted material.

    The DVD window isn't actually black -- it's a dark shade of ugly green and the system uses something to replace that with the DVD footage. In OS9, you could set your desktop graphic to this color and play DVDs on your desktop. :)

    To confirm that you can take screen shots of graphics that are accelerated in the graphics card, I took a screen shot of iTunes showing a psychedelic animation inside a window. The screen shot shows the openGL graphics as well as the desktop and other windows.

  5. Pismo?! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That machine is ancient in Mac-time. You don't see me griping about not having HW acceleration on a Lombard do you? No, I went out and bought a DP 800 G4 so I could play too.

    Why is it that you purchased a machine with a cripple mobile graphics card and then were surprised to discover its limitations?

    1. Re:Pismo?! by frankie · · Score: 2

      That machine is ancient in Mac-time. [...] I went out and bought a DP 800 G4 so I could play too.

      DP800 means you got a Quicksilver, released in Summer/Fall 2001. If I bought a PowerBook in the same time frame, it would have been a Mercury, with the exact same Rage 128 AGP 2x as Pismo.

      In other words: the top-end mobile Mac available at any price only 8 months ago, which was specifically advertised as being a dream machine for video & graphics professionals, cannot use Quark Extreme. That's just plain wrong.

    2. Re:Pismo?! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Right, but you don't own one of those PowerBooks. You own a Pismo.

      I own a 400MHz PowerBook with a Rage 128 M so no QE love for me.

      So I dunno what you want out of this other than the impossible? QE cannot physically run on systems with less than 16mb of ram and less than Radeon quality performance. It's not Apple's fault, any more than Doom 3 will require very similar specs. Hardware acceleration requires the proper hardware!

      Oh, unless you mean you want hardware acceleration using your Rage 128?

      How manytimes have you heard it? 10.2 will see significant performance boosts; just don't expect to run QE.

    3. Re:Pismo?! by Lally+Singh · · Score: 2
      In other words: the top-end mobile Mac available at any price only 8 months ago, which was specifically advertised as being a dream machine for video & graphics professionals, cannot use Quark Extreme. That's just plain wrong.
      Why? Video & graphics professionals can still edit video in realtime. What's your beef? QE won't be utilized in the latest software for quite a while, so for right now, it'll just be a graphics acceleration layer, which isn't of much use to people editing video.
      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    4. Re:Pismo?! by frankie · · Score: 2

      QE cannot physically run on systems with less than 16mb of ram and less than Radeon quality performance. It's not Apple's fault

      It is certainly Apple's fault, because they aren't trying hard enough. Apple's own Java group demonstrated one year ago that it's totally feasible to have hardware acceleration on Rage 128. (BTW, read the MacSlash article and you'll see very familiar discussion).

      While it may be true that the exact feature set of Quartz Extreme cannot be achieved on a Rage 128, it is clearly false that they couldn't provide some level of boost to older GPUs. Apple chooses not to bother, and that choice merits complaint.

    5. Re:Pismo?! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Isn't that exactly what I said? 10.2 will see exceleration on your Pismo, but you won't see QE running on it?

      And I'll see even more exceleration, but I still won't be running QE?

    6. Re:Pismo?! by frankie · · Score: 2

      exactly what I said? 10.2 will see exceleration on your Pismo

      Totally unrelated. 10.2 will be faster because it's compiled with GCC3. That has nothing to do with offloading graphics tasks to the GPU.

      We could just as well get the benefits of GCC3 if Apple used it to compile 10.1.5, and sent it out via Software Update.

  6. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by SpamJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quartz extreme is *not* meant for everyone. It is lucky that Apple is releasing it this early at all; Microsoft's fully accellerated GUI is more than a year away, likely more than two. Unaccellerated Quartz is still very fast and very advanced - still unlike anything any other OS has.

    Also doing text on GL has always been a bit weird - lining up pixels and so on is kind of awkward. Unaccellerated Quartz will always be there, and always be reliable. It's not like Apple is suddenly making OS X only work on these video cards.

    You're not going to expect Doom III to work on these machines as well, are you?

  7. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Informative
    disappointing and downright rude if you've got 1+ month old iBook, a 5+ month old iMac, or a 9+ month old PowerBook. In other words, the majority of Macs sold in the past year (and 95% of OSX-capable Macs sold before that) cannot use Quartz Extreme.
    Yes, how dare Apple develop new technology that utilizes the latest (and future) hardware to its fullest! What were they thinking?!?

    That's just like those damn ID Software people that keep putting out new games that make us buy new video cards!

    Anyway...one clarification:

    the majority of Macs sold in the past year (and 95% of OSX-capable Macs sold before that) cannot use Quartz Extreme.
    You forgot "to its fullest extent." Read the Quartz Extreme specs again, and pay special attention to the word 'recommended.' Look it up if you need to.
    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  8. Re:/.'d already by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2

    Man, what I wouldn't give to have Zoom on my iBook. The resolution is just too darn high, I keep finding myself slouching to get a better look at the screen. Does zoom require Quartz Extreme hardware goodness? Given that the whole Quartz system is supposedly PDF based there would be no technical justification for that--I was kind of shocked when I discovered original 10.0 OS X didn't have a zooming feature--without zoom, what's the point of having everything in PDF?!

  9. Before everyone starts their bitching... by Lally+Singh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yes, Quartz Extreme requires a 32MB AGPx2 video card. That's because everything is now rendered to OpenGL and then the card takes care of the drawing from there. So, it simply _can't_ work on older graphics cards that don't do much 3D optimization, like the Rage128.

    So, you can't do lots of cool little tricks. Jaguar does have plenty of other graphics optimizations. I've seen it fly on iBooks. It's simply faster. OS X has up until now been worked on for functionality, not speed. Now Apple's optimizing it, and it is crazy fast. CRAZY FAST.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    1. Re:Before everyone starts their bitching... by k_187 · · Score: 2

      Quartz Extreme doesn't require 32mb of Ram on the vidcard. its just recommended. I read somewhere that a radeon or better was needed because the rage128 and lower can't accept textures whose sizes aren't a power (or maybe multiple I can't remember) of 2. Makes me wonder if the AGP slot is needed, or if its just the chip.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
  10. Re:DVD screengrabs in OSX by shunnicutt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Snapz Pro can only grab shots from DVD if you're using an Nvidia card.

  11. Re:I still don't get it by FaRuvius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, lets think for a second that maybe not EVERYBODY in the world has your wonderful vision.

    In fact, many people with handicaps are prevented from using computers because they can't distinguish the shapes on the screen. Intensive magnification of the screen contents allows these people to use computers effectively.

    The zooming is actually magnification of the screen, I think the really nifty part that they were trying to show was the real time zooming on a DVD image with no slowdown of the dvd frame rate. ( I believe they were pausing the dvd here and there, I could be wrong)

    --
    Need to get away?
    Adirondack Vacations
  12. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, I was kind of ticked it wasn't going to work with my little iBook ... in retrospect, it makes sense to expect that though. To store a texture big enough for my iBooks screen of size 1024 * 768 at 32bpp(4 bytes) takes 3 megs. Then consider overlapping windows (typically LOTS of those, at least the way I use computers) and other overhead... it all adds up, I suppose.

    It was just a nasty surprise to read about how sexy cool Quartz Extreme would be until I'm drooling, then get all of those dreams dashed to pieces by brutal, brutal reality. Such is life.

  13. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by jcr · · Score: 2

    Hardware graphics acceleration for my Pismo is not an unreasonable request!

    Sorry, but it's a hardware limitation. QZX requires a graphics accelerator chip that can handle non-power-of-two textures.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  14. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by arson1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Translation of "Recommended" -- You'll need double this spec this to use the product properly.

    No, that's the translation of "Minimum Requirements" :)

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
  15. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by singularity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, how dare Apple develop new technology that utilizes the latest (and future) hardware to its fullest!

    Exactly! I am still upset that Apple is adding AltiVec enhancements. If iMacs and iBooks cannot benifit from it, Apple should never start adding it to the OS until every machine offered by Apple has had at least a G4 for at least a year (so as to prevent anyone from yelling "But I just bought my iBook six months ago, and it will not support it!")

    /sarcasm

    All indications show that Jaguar will offer a speed-up for non-QE capable machines.

    Perhaps Apple could have written QE with the Rage Pro in mind. I am guessing doing that would seriously prevent the major speed-up we are going to see instead. Doing so would be ignoring the increased bandwidth offered by AGP 4x and the increased capabilities of having 32 megs of VRAM on-board.

    I am glad to see Apple writing software for the future with the past in mind, but not driving development.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  16. A much better QE example video. by johnpg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's a better one. It's 20mb. Someone please MIRROR it as I don't want to be slashdotted.

    http://207.182.242.235/jaguardemo1.mov (right click and save is probably wise).

    I made that a few days ago (posted the link on macrumors), to see if that QE video was for real. It was, but there are some issues with sound. My footage has sound, so you can hear when it cuts out. QE is not as wonderful as the original video made it seem, but it isn't bad either. There's also a comparision at the end trying to do the same things under 10.1.4.

    Again, please be kind and mirror that video.

  17. Re:I still don't get it by Molz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was also a demo shown (I can't find it now though) of the OpenGL Teapot and some other figures floating around on the screen. They were infront of a DVD and the DVD was reflecting on them. It was pretty awsome.

    The transparent terminals on top of the DVD are pretty cool too, although I think the biggest improvement that QE will bring is the increased speed.

    --
    Can I Play With Madness?
  18. Re:Any project for linux ? by Molz · · Score: 2, Informative

    You mean a project to convert X11 into an OpenGL stream (which is basicaly what QE does), or do you want Quartz on Linux?

    I seriously doubt there is either going on, although the Berlin Project might bring it closer to reality.

    --
    Can I Play With Madness?
  19. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by Xenex · · Score: 2
    You forgot "to its fullest extent." Read the Quartz Extreme specs again, and pay special attention to the word 'recommended.' Look it up if you need to.


    If you're implying Quartz Extreme will work, but perform poorly, on non-Radeon/GeForce>2 hardware you are incorrect. Older cards just use plain 'old' Quartz. It's the video RAM that the recommendation speaks of, suggesting 32MB. I know for a fact that Quartz Extreme doesn't work on lesser cards; I'm using Jaguar on my late 2001 iBook right now.

    If you're not implying that, sorry, please disregard this post. :)
  20. Re:wonderful, *IF* you've got a Radeon or GF2... by Xenex · · Score: 2
    I have ranted very briefly on the speed of Jaguar on my iBook here.


    Anyway, on my late 2001 iBook 600 (with 640MB RAM), the WWDC Jaguar Dev Seed is a little quicker, but it's not by leaps and bounds. This is no 10.0 to 10.1 style boost, at least not at the moment.

    It's better, but it don't expect too much. The new Finder is much faster though...


    Now for the random screenshots...

    Startup Disk. The only place where the OS is refered to as "10.2", thus feeding the "10.5" rumours.

    Lots of new Jaguar Stuff. New System Preferences, About This Mac, iChat, Terminal, About QuickTime...

    Aqua Blue Beachball. The new spinning cursor.

    Anyway, if you want to know anything specifically, post here...
  21. For OSS users, there may be an alternative. by pschmied · · Score: 2
    This sounds very similar to what Enlightenment is doing with Evas.

    Maybe some opportunities for worlds to meet?


    -Peter

  22. Re:are screenshots a thing of the past? by Dahan · · Score: 2
    (but the DVD forum does prevent player companies from working around this).

    Screenshot is a supported feature of InterVideo WinDVD (yeah, it's not Mac, but it's still a DVD player)... just press the "P" key, I think. The DVD forum didn't prevent them from adding that feature...