Slashdot Mirror
Legal Issues for Outside Webcams and Others Privacy?
Jesse Ferrell asks: "My neighbors are asking for me to remove my (weather) web cams from my website because they show part of their houses. Is there any legal precedent to a case like this? I can point the cameras upwards towards the sky more (they are weather cams of course) but it will take time and equipment, possibly modifications to my house. Have you ever heard of a similar situation? What should I do? I'll check the local ordinances and see what I come up with."
Since you are just capturing the exterior of their homes, which is in the public domain, there shouldn't be a problem. YOu're only concern should be is that if the cameras are placed in such a way as to reveal something that normaly would be hidden.
Your neighbors asked you to point them somewhere else. They havent taken you to court, they havent threatened to sue. Why wouldn't you? So it will take a little effort on your part. So what. Do you dislike your neighbors that much? We spend so much time on slashdot bitching about stupid laws, but its stuff like this that gets the stupid laws put into place. People arent willing to make what seems like a reasonable concesssion, so next year therel be local law that says you ant leave an unattened camera filming someone elses property that will take years to get rid of, if we can.
All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
But he might just be asking for a curtesy, maybe he likes walking around naked in his apartment and doesn't want his co-workers looking at the web page obsesively trying to get a good look. Maybe just positioning it differently will appease him. If you live in a co-op with him he might be able to get you to take it down entirely by appealing to the board. Besides curtesy is underrated, if you can make him happy without ruining the camera view why not?
There might also be a technological solution, blur the portions of the images that show windows before sending them out as a web cam.
While such cameras are expensive (approx. US$1500), and provide aanalog RS-170 video which would have to be digitized, and not exactly "web" cams, if you point your cam at a fixed point, perhaps you could use software to blur out any of your neighbors' windows or other "sensitive" areas.
I'd talk to a lawyer, find out what you can do (probably a lot, unless you're shooting into their windows, or fenced-in yard), and then suggest reasonable blurring of possibly sensitive portions. IOW, offer to go above and beyond what you have to do, as a gesture of goodwill, and it this isn't good enough, send them a lawyers' letter to stop the harassment.
You could've hired me.
Well, it would help if you told us where you live.
But really, if you're in the US, it's very unlikely that your neighbors have any legal ground to support their request. In fact, it's legal in most places to videotape people nude in the shower if you can see them from your property. I don't know if you can have friends over for beer and pretzels to watch those tapes, but I assume so. IANAL.
On the other hand, how important is it to you to keep good relations with your neighbors, and is it worth a whole lot of intra-neigbor unpleasantness to keep the houses in the frame?
You could always use webcam software which overlays a transparent graphic over their houses, if the views never change. There's plenty of it available. Google search: webcam software overlay graphics
"While such cameras are expensive (approx. US$1500),.......... software to blur out any of your neighbors' windows or other "sensitive" areas. "
Cardboard cutout to block the neighbors house. 5 cents.
All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
to your neighbors, I would make the atttempt to repoint the cameras. As a previous poster pointed out, they haven't taken you to court, so presumably there is no animosity yet.
Potential solutions:
1) mount the camera on the roof. This should get you better clearance.
2) Cut a silhouette and place in front of the camera. That way you can make people think you live somewhere more exciting (that was NOT intended as a cheap shot at your town).
3) Mount the cameras at your local school. Give the kids something to ooh and aah about, do something good for your community, appease your neighbors, and get that warm fuzzy feeling all in one.
Have a better one.
To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
A lot of their perceived problem probably arises from what they think you're going to be able to see.
I don't think I'd be too impressed with a webcam that offers a perfect view into my bedroom, for example.
Probably the best way of resolving this is to show them what the view that the camera gets is. They can then tell you which bits they're not happy about and you can potentially come to a mutually agreeable solution.
Having had a look at the site, I'm guessing that it's cam #2 that's causing the issue. All it really needs is to be tilted up by a couple of degrees more to get those windows on the bottom left out of the picture.
In cases such as this it is always better to try to talk about it rationally before getting all litigious. From a legal standpoint, you'll probably end up being forced to tilt the camera up a couple of degrees. The difference will be that it'll be after a drawn out process which will alienate you from your neighbours and the only people profitting will be the lawyers.
Here in the UK, we have rights under the Data Protection Act to a copy of any video footage involving us (eg CCTV) and for our faces to be obscured if the footage is distributed without our permission. This usually only applies to footage that is stored on tape etc so webcams would be a bit of a grey area anyway (although the courts would probably say that the neighbours have the right to their privacy).
I would have to suggest that you prove yourself as a mature and rational member of your physical community and move/adjust the camera in a way to appease your neighboors. I would show them that you respect people's personal boundries, and perhaps gain a measure of dignity for the larger community of sky-watchers/geeks/whatevers in that person's eyes.
Don't resort to hiding behind the word of law. Be proactive and keep the peace. you might get a little more respect from them in the future when something gets under your skin.
"If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
Tell us the URL so we can judge for ourselves if you are invading your neighbour's privacy. And if we deem that you are guilty we will issue a 24 hour, round the clock /.ing penalty.
Political Correctness is doubleplusungood.
Your neighbors probably have no legal grounds for such a request, as one can hardly be considered to have privacy in one's yard, which is in the view of numerous neighbors.
However, if they have built a wall around their yard for privacy, and your camera is such that it can see over their wall, they might have better legal grounds.
However, despite the legal grounds, you may want to keep on good terms with your neighbors. Since your camera is in fixed position, a certain part of what it videorecords will always be yard, another (higher) part will be sky. Simply black out the yard part with some software. I don't know of what software may do this, but its a relatively simple thing -- you just black out say the lower fourth of what your webcam records, which is ground anyways and not sky.
social sciences can never use experience to verify their statemen
The core issue here, regarding the weather webcam, is what is the right thing to do, and I don't really see any doubt: the original post mentions that it is possible, though inconvenient, to reposition the cameras, and actually implies that repositioning the cameras would provide a better picture of the weather. Just do it.
There is another issue with webcams that I think needs to be pointed out: consider that the weirdest people may view your webcam. For example, if you have a webcam that shows the traffic on your street, and the picture includes the sidewalk, a pedophile could use the webcam to profile when the local schoolkids walk to school, and to get a nice look to decide which one to abduct. Yes, it's extremely unlikely, but how would you feel the next day if that happened?
Also, someone wrote:
>> In fact, it's legal in most places to videotape people nude in the shower if you can see them from your property.<<
I didn't see the usual "IANAL" disclaimer, but let me be clear on this: I am a lawyer, and I am quite certain that it WOULD be illegal (in California, at least, and probably in nearly ever U.S. state) to set up a webcam that peers into the neighbor's shower, even through an open window (note my shift from "videotape" to "webcam"). You might be legally able to videotape the neighbor in his shower, for example, to create evidence that your neighbor is indecently exposing himself to your family (one would assume that you'd not need to do this just to support of your request to the neighbor that he install a curtain or blinds). But you could not legally videotape your neighbor in the shower and show it to others for entertainment.
-- http://www.MarkWelch.com/ Pleasanton California
You are wrangling with something that ought to be discussed with legal counsel. It may be in your best interest to re-aim the camera, and/or use the computer to blur/black/remove/annotate portions of the picture that your neighbors object to. (ie, black out the house and put in small print: "Smelly people" or some such nonsense. Not wise, nor kind, but funny all the same.)
That being said - video recording laws are being changed, but in most states, right now, you can record pretty much anything to video (NOT AUDIO) in any place, public or private with few exceptions.
If want to stand your ground, you might at least try to be courteous and safe. Point out that your camera doesn't see into private yards, and through windows. Point out that everything you can see on camera can be seen by a person from a similar vantage point, and that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy from a person, camera, or any viewing device similarily mounted.
Once you've done that, change the view anyway and very subtly imply that any view that includes them is ruined, or you've seen all of them that you care to see. Or you could be really mean and publish as much info about them on your page as is legally allowed, maybe some extra pictures, notes about their appearance and behavior. That'll get them really riled up.
You might want to think about the flip side, though. Right now some thief could be watching their coming/going and making a schedule of when they are home, when they aren't, how they typically secure their home, etc. It could be some pedophile sitting in front of their computer waiting to see when their kid is home.
You ought to ask yourself, do you value your privacy in public places? Do you like the idea of video cameras everywhere? Perhaps these neighbors are avid readers of Slashdot and they love the YRO section. They may simply be expressing their desire for more public privacy.
-Adam
Since the cameras are stationary you could just take photoshop/Gimp and create a black mask of the houses and then just us that to create a silluet( SP?). Then just overlay that on the captured image before you put it on the site.
the complainer that is. i checked out the website and the only houses that i can see in the webcams are really far away. you cannot see into them or anythong like that. but i geuss i am just old fashion
If the camera in question always looks the same direction (no pan & tilt), then you just need to batch process the images before publishing them.
Either mask out the scenery in the foreground, or blur it beyond recognition.
The merge between your background image (the "live" picture) and a foreground image would probably be easiest. That or do a poly-fill on known coordinates from a command line. GNUplot could almost do that.
But, in the interest of being a good neighbor, unplug, or stop publishing the camera pix, until you have a permanent solution.
Don't piss your neighbors off. If your house catches fire or is burgled while you're away, they may pull up deck chairs and watch, rather than telephoning for help.
I am proud of the many slashdotters whose advice was to be nice and try to accomodate the neighbor. I assumed that most people would say "Tell 'em to ^$%* off." Thanks for restoring a bit of my faith in human nature.
J'aime mieux les méchants que les imbéciles, parce qu'ils se reposent. -- Alexandre Dumas
They aren't asking anything unreasonable.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. It's time to grow up and behave like a civilised human living in close proximity to other civilised humans.
.sig wanted: Must be concise, funny, and display my cleverness.
"yeah this site, I uh... use cameras to look at the weather. Yeah that's it. That's why they look in the windows of the house next door"
It is a fucking weather camera. Stick your head out the fucking window if you want the weather.
They have the legal advantage. You legally cannot take someones picture and publish without consent. You know do not have consent. If I were you I would stop whinning and remove the camera.
Oh and god forbid don't point it in your shower. We don't need another one of those. Especially a nerd one!
Can't we all just get along?
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
A few links, minimal comment; This was mentioned (iirc) on /. earlier, and I keep referring back to it. I really don't understand the difference between a person seeing and hearing something in public versus a camera observing the same thing.
And I wonder what your neighbors would think of my my perv-cam hack
455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
Why not just build an overlay that will mask out their house with something else asn ask them if that would suffice. My guess you are asking /. because you really want to keep your cam pointing in that direction
-- Tim
TKrabec Pahh
C'mon, we're geeks here. We should all be aware of the untoward possibilities of "feature creep".
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
Well /. wouldn't let me create an account ("create account" link is bogus, must be an inside joke... not sure I get all this /. stuff) This is the original poster, wxcam@weathermatrix.net
t . pg
People, PEOPLE, don't freak out. Of course I will attempt to move the camera upwards to avoid a court battle or any more problems from these neighbors (this is not the first thing on my property they've raised a stink over). And I want to be nice in this time of national paranoia.
I agree that an image processor might be the answer but I'm not on some fancy linux system and can't code anything to do that, this is straight win98 with the crappy webcam32 software. It *does* have an "image processing dll" button but I have no idea how to program the library to, say, mosaic or blur out the bottom 1/4 of the image.
In response to what people have said... thanks to most of you except people without brains... I see one person threatened my life if I didn't move the cam... um... thanks, I'll remember not to post here next time. And to the shower comment, where in the world do you guys make up this stuff... Can you see a shower here??http://www.weathermatrix.net/wxcam/1/curren
This is the cam in question.
For the rest of you that have a brain, I appreciate the thoughts.
What I would do is simply ask that they take a look at those cameras views. To me I cannot see what the big deal is, The detail level in the camera views, you cannot even see a small poodle dog if it was hung from the window by his collar. You should ask them if they intend upon dancing naked on their rooftops.
If they really have a problem with the cameras, get a smoked dome or even better a mirror (blind the bastards that try to see where the camera is pointed) or point out the fact that you are not being incedulous by using a smoked or mirror dome to disguise the fact the camera is pointed skyward and not pointed through their bathroom window at the mirror which catches the reflection of a large picture of great aunt martha which also reflects a few of the neighbor's little johnny wacking off on the toilet.
Your neighbors have watched too much CSI or The agency and saw too many times where "MOVIE PHOTOSHOP" was capable of pulling a relfection of a face out of the reflection of a black wall off a pair of sunglasses. It simply isnt done with color cameras, the resolution is just way too low. Hell you couldnt even get your camera to totally fill up my 600x480 laptop screen much less blow away the res my friend's photoshop studio screens. You can possibly do it with very ultra hi-res black and white models like what is used on the sattlites of your favorite goverments at http://terraserver.microsoft.com/
I suggest you find a view of their home at terraserver and tell them to attack the goverment first, as they show their whole roof, and all of their yard.
DRACO-
Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
or worse they may be the ones setting fires and burglering!
Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
As the child of parents who keep a very noisey dog in the neighborhood, it is not cool to hear about how the dog upsets people so much. Heck, she drives me nuts! So be nice if you can!
Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
If you did this to my house, you would very quickly find at least one laser permanently aimed into your lens.