Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla 1.1 Alpha Released
theBrownfury writes: "Mozilla.org has released Mozilla 1.1 alpha, the first post 1.0 milestone.
This release has been in the works for almost 2 months now incorporating
over 1700 bug fixes and more than a dozen new features. Including: Quartz
rendering for OS X 10.1.5 users, new layout performance enhancements targeted
at DHTML, faster startup times and more. Here are the release notes and
the link to the releases page
or FTP
for downloads."
This was released days ago. I _do not_ mean to troll, but this really is rather latesom.
Mz 1.1 is quite stable really. Only one crash in the several days I've been using it.
Btw, you need to go into the preferences and turn pipelined http on - it's off by default. In my experience, it increases speed by about ~25%. Very good stuff.
You can't run Java applets when you don't have a Java Virtual Machine installed. By default, Mozilla doesn't have one installed.
m l
Head over to:
http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/index.ht
Once again we have to say well done to the Mozilla team for finally delivering a very usable product. It's great to jump between Linux and Windows and to have the same browser. Some people have complained about its memory use, but if your machine is halfway decent, it's really a simple Web browser that gets the job done.
However, there are several things that stop me from using it 100% of the time. I still stick to IE for about 25% of sites, because.. of all the little bugs! I'm hoping some have been cleared up in this Alpha. They include:
* Keyboard not responding sometimes when you open a new Mozilla window (this is in Bugzilla)
* When you click on some links, it doesn't go to the destination.. and it just displays a picture off of the current page! Hit Refresh and you finally go on your way.
* Mozilla is less system tolerant than IE. Mozilla is often the first application to lose its icons and its interface starts falling to pieces. This is probably because of my memory or the CPU overheating.. but IE remains stable until the last minute.
* Mozilla often bawks if you're loading large JPEGs into it direct from hard disk.. and it just displays a blank/white screen with scrollbars.
* Many sites still don't display well in Mozilla. This is the Web developer's fault, but still.. Mozilla can do all of those DHTML menus and stuff, yet I still run into problems on sites that use them. An optional 'IE compliancy' patch in Mozilla would be very very useful!
mogorific carpentry experiments
Mozilla needs at least Java 1.3.1_02 on Windows and Java 1.4.0_01 on Linux for applets to work properly.
:-).
Even then, lots of applets are MS pseudo-java (and only work in the Microsoft VM) rather than real Sun/IBM/etc. Java. AFAIK the games.yahoo.com used the MS-Java specific crap (for no good reason) last time I checked.
Applets actually written for Java 1.3/1.4 work brilliantly, I find, and the fact that 1.4 applets get the DOM of the page they are embedded in is cool, too. Next step: drag-n-drop applets in Composer
and to fill in the next mozilla realaes lets look at the roadmap:
1.1alpha 12-Jun-2002
1.1beta 17-Jul-2002
1.1 09-Aug-2002
Security fixes in mozilla 1.0 not included here.
[For reference, this is with Mozilla 1.0 and Sun's JRE, either 1.3.1 and 1.4.0_01. YMMV with other VMs]
I was playing dominoes on games.yahoo.com just last night - on mozilla 1.0
I had a lot of trouble installing java on moz 0.9.8 a while ago, but when I did a full reinstall with 1.0 it went without a hitch, installed, and runs absolutely perfectly...
Well, the DoS doesn't happen in any of the other browser for X, so it'd be nice if mozilla could handle it the same way.
My email addy? should be easy enough.
So how many bugs are open on IE? How do you know it's 10x as many bugs? For that matter, how do you actually raise a bug on IE if you find one? Microsoft do their best to hide that kind of information.
The fact is Internet Explorer is closed source. You have no idea how many bugs are open on it, how many are fixed between builds, the quality of patches, the quality of the code or even what features are being worked on at any given time. Mozilla allows you to do all which consequently means a lot of people are motivated to find and reports bugs and often submit patches.
Besides, a lot of the so-called bugs on mozilla are covering feature work, more deal with embedding and API cleanup, more are dupes, more are issues restricted to specific sites and more deal with issues on specific platforms. They might all be labelled "bugs" but the number of crash/non-functional/quirk issues are actually a subset.
Here's the solution: cd over /usr/local/mozilla-1.0/, remove all Java-related files and the java2 directory. Then go to java.sun.com and reinstall.
Everything now seems to work fine. Don't ask me why it works, though.
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
If you check mozilla.org you'll see that 1.1a is Mozilla 1.1 ALPHA! The roadmap clarifies more:
The mozilla 1.0 stable branch will continue as 1.0.x, and the 1.x series will continue as test milestones for evaluation of the latest features added to the trunk development. Each release cycle will be about 13 weeks long, consisting of 5 weeks work then an ALPHA release, another 5 weeks then a BETA release, then a week or so freeze before the milestone.
This release is 1.1 ALPHA. Lots of nice things in there for those who are following Moz and don't mind the shortcomings, but if you just want to complain, stick to IE.
Mozilla
Actually, I found that the biggest problem with Mozilla in RedHat 7.3 was that I had installed the AbiWord word processor when I installed the system. AbiWord happens to have some really poor quality fonts named according to the Microsoft convention.. Arial, etc. So any web page that gives you something like
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
will cause Mozilla on X to go and find the lousy AbiWord fonts, no matter what you try and do in the Mozilla font preferences.
The solution is to comment out the reference to the AbiSuite fonts in /etc/X11/fs/config from finding the AbiWord MS-named fonts.
Mozilla on RedHat 7.3 was totally unusable until I did this.
- jon
Ganymede, a GPL'ed metadirectory for UNIX
Both Mozilla 0.9x and 1.x on both Linux x86 and PPC run most of applets published on the web perfectly, being installed with Java 1.3.x. So, relax your Java requirement for Linux platforms.
Moreover, Java 1.4 has lots of compatibility issues with software written for Java 1.3.x For example, Tomcat, JBoss and PostgreSQL JDBC both fail to work with Java 1.4. So, don't recommend java 1.4 once it's broken.
Does anyone know when Sun is going to fix broken compatibility of Java 1.4.x ?
That's --enable-svg
The reason is a licensing issue related to libart, AFAIK
It is as simple as
ctrl+t
Quit being ignorant.
Mozilla is not meant as an end user application. It is meant as a resource for developers and bug testers. The fact that you even thought it was for end users shows how good of a job they are really doing. This point as been mentioned numerous times, and it's even stated when you download Mozilla.
There are distributions of Mozilla meant for end users. Netscape 6.0+, Galleon, hopefully AOL soon. =)
:wq
Select the text in your xterm. Click the middle mouse button anywhere other than a link in the browser window. Voila.
Ryan Patrick Harris (maxter)
http://maxtersbox.net University of Michigan