Slashdot Mirror


Review: Men In Black II

The first Men In Black came out of nowhere five years ago. Barry Sonnenfeld stole the box office that summer with the original, strange, hilarious, spoofy sci-fi comedy. Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones were the perfect pair for this inventive "who-are-the-aliens-in-our-midst" romp, playing secret agents working for a super-secret government agency keeping an eye on beings from outer space. It was perfect for the era of the still-vibrant X-Files. The sequel, inevitably, has lost some of the surprise. But it's still plenty of fun. Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending, not that it matters here.

The story line is almost irrelevant. Will Smith (Agent Jay) has to neuralize one dumb partner after another, and ends up with a smart-mouthed, sometimes hilarious pug for a partner. He pines for his former sidekick Tommy Lee Jones (Agent Kay), now neuralized and working for the institution with the greatest number of aliens, the U.S. Post Office. (The movie, like the first, gets off some great double entendres and inside jokes).

The movie opens with a campy Peter Graves spoof on the Ed Woods' style sci-fi movies of the 50's and 60's. Simply, Lara Flynn Boyle plays Serleena, the powerful alien queen ravaging earth to get her hands on a distant planet's light source. If she isn't stopped, the world will be destroyed, of course. Her prescence forces the MIB agency (headed by Sid, played by Rip Torn) to go and de-neuralize Kay, who comes back to re-join his buddy and save the world.

This is all beside the point, of course. The whole film is a device for Sonnenfeld's loopy rags on Martha Stewart (not perhaps as funny as it would have been a month ago) and Michael Jackson. There are hilarious locker room and worm aliens, and blessedly, the movie never takes itself seriously for a single second. Like the better parts of the Scream series, the movie ends up spoofing itself and the people who loved it.

If you go see it, all you need to know is that the surprise originality of the first is missing, mostly because we know what to expect, but the loopy and inventive spirit of MIB is very much alive.

CmdrTaco my 2 bits is that this movie was bland. It probably is my least favorite of the last half dozen movies I've seen. I loved the original, but this just doesn't have the punch of the first. Its got its moments, but the whole ride is weak. Watch Lilo & Stich instead ;)

32 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. Best line by xercist · · Score: 4, Funny

    "He's a Ballchinian!"

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    1. Re:Best line by Knobby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For those wondering "WTF?," Take a look here. On the seventh line, there's a link to an image of a ballchin boy..

  2. More sequels? by Theologian · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The sequel, inevitably, has lost some of the surprise.

    It has also lost some of the originality. What happened to new movies with original screenplays?

    --

    Crapdot
    News from birds. Stuff that splatters.
    1. Re:More sequels? by CptNerd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, really, can you believe they made a sequel to "Fellowship of the Ring?"

      I mean, we've *seen* hobbits and elves and wizards, where are the *original* ideas?

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    2. Re:More sequels? by MeowMeow+Jones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention the fact that they shamelessly ripped the story off from a book.

      --

      Trolls throughout history:
      Jonathan Swift

  3. Lilo and Stitch all the way! by JoshWurzel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Saw Lilo and Stitch opening weekend. Like attendence at Powerpuff Girls, we were the only ones in our demographic in the theater. We also laughed harder and louder than anyone else. People probably thought we were stoned.

    Speaking of which...why hasn't there been a slashdot review of Lilo and Stitch?

  4. ChubChubs!! by taeric · · Score: 4, Funny

    Say what you will for this movie. The short that preceded it was absolutely hilarious.

    I believe I laughed more for those few minutes then I have at many full length movies.

    I don't want to start too many spoilers on a root thread, so instead of listing the appearances, I'll just ask. Who all did people notice that they think may have been missed. I'll look for them next time. :)

  5. Um... by Masem · · Score: 5, Informative
    (headed by Sid, played by Rip Torn)

    "Sid"?? I'm pretty sure (and now positive after an IMDB check) that it's "Zed".

    However, I will agree that the movie wasn't like the first, and for some reason, most of the CGI SFX seems poorly meshed with the rest of the visuals (for example, the two-headed alien). And TLJones didn't have the same deadpan that his character really needed (compared with the first). I will say, however, that getting Patrick Warburton (star of "The Tick") to play Agent T was a good choice and provided some good opening laughs.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  6. The boss's name by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Boss's name is ZED , not Sid. That's zed as in the last letter of the alphabet in all English-speaking nations except the U.S., where, for some unkonwn reason, we call it zee

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
    1. Re:The boss's name by Frank+Grimes · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's zed as in the last letter of the alphabet in all English-speaking nations except the U.S.
      Wait, slow down. Are you saying that there are other nations, outside of the United States? I really don't buy that. And even if there were, how could thier language and culture be any different from ours?
      --
      CfkRAp1041vYQVbFY1aIwA== RV/hBCLKKcSTP5UFK3kqsg==
    2. Re:The boss's name by Kraft · · Score: 5, Funny

      You need to study some geography.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
  7. Lets review the kiddie toons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "why hasn't there been a slashdot review of Lilo and Stitch?"

    It's in the queue behind "Pokemon II", "The Care Bears Movie", and "The Land Before Time IV"

  8. This is odd... by Wrexen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who are you, and what did you do with the real JonKatz?

  9. Re:Hmm, where's Linda? by iElucidate · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a throwaway reference to "your old partner who liked it better at the morgue." It all went downhill from there, and that was in the first five minutes. Kinda the way they keep dumping Austin Powers' girls.

  10. Theme song by Paraplegic+Vigilante · · Score: 4, Funny
    Does anyone else think that Will Smith MIB 2 theme song is really, really bad? Nod ya head? Anyone with me?

    --

    Is your workplace ADA compliant?

  11. Hmm by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    working for a super-secret government agency

    I got the idea in the first one that they didn't work for the government and were autonomous because it asked too many questions. Either way, anyone else find it funny how CmdrTaco simple 3 line review completely contrasts and pretty much cuts down JonKatz's review? Of course the question is which one will /.ers puts more credence in? :)

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Hmm by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course the question is which one will /.ers puts more credence in?

      Az with eevry othr /. storie, hoovre speeled theres' th beste.

  12. Oh those sequels by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hollyweird has gotten so bad these days, that you can *practically* guarantee that anything with a number behind it will suck big time.

    Nonetheless I was surprised when a sequel to MIB was announced (I didn't feel it needed one, but you know how Hollywood is..if the 1st made even a smidgen of money, sequel it!) and even more so that it didn't pick up where the last one left off (with Linda F. has Will's new partner).

    So, I go see the film with reservations, and I was pleasantly surprised.

    Sure, the film takes itself even less seriously than the last one, but it does expand more on the aliens and esp. the worm guys. It's funny, without degenerating into slapstick or schlock.

    I think what helped that was having the same director for both.

    In any case it's *certainly* better than other current sci-fi offerings currently playing at the theatres.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  13. Missing the point of MIB by rufusdufus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The reviewer should pay a little more attention when he decides to write a review. The fact that he missed the part about the leader being Zed, not "Sid" is a big indicator of how much he missed.

    MIB movies are not really about the plot. They are about mind expansion. About reading between the lines. And about perspective. That our perception is marred by the flaws of our memory, and our wishful thinking, and our emotional pain.
    That your world view is just one of many, and pointedly, that thats OK.

  14. Re:Hmm, where's Linda? by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Linda Florentino apparently is a difficult actress to work with. I have this on general hearsay from the 'net, so take that as you will. Either she has a prima donna attitude, or does not like to work in sequels. (Note her lack of appearance in any Kevin Smith movies after "Dogma", or MIB2.)

    A third option escapes me, but--who knows--she may simply want to spend more time with her family.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  15. Sequels S*** by rirugrat · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Point A: MIIB is a sequel (note the "clever" way they incorporate the number "two" in the title).

    Point B: With the possible exceptions of The Godfather Part II, Aliens, Superman II and Raquel Darrian's boob job...*all* sequels s***.

    Point A + Point B = MIIB S***s!

    Chris

    1. Re:Sequels S*** by SquadBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wrath of Kahn. Toy Story 2. Empire which was better than SW:ANH. I liked Aliens better than Alien but that one is not as widely accepted. Also many of the Star Trek movies are better than the first one.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:Sequels S*** by pinkpineapple · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Terminator 2 didn't reallty suck neither... Original plot, killer effects, even better acting, plenty of lines to remember (Hasta la vista baby, I'll be back). That was a dream sequel compare to others.

      PPA, the girl next door.

      --
      -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
  16. delayed lucidity by jafac · · Score: 3, Troll

    I've noticed an odd effect, roughly for the past two or three years, prior to watching a movie, I've been a little exited by the hype, then while watching the movie, I'm usually really digging it. Then, anywhere from a couple of hours to maybe a day later, I'm thinking about it and going, "man, that movie actually kinda sucked".

    I mean, Episode I, despite Jar Jar, I was really exited and into it, because my 6 year old son was. But later, thinking about it, I couldn't find any really redeeming qualities to it except maybe a little satisfaction at knowing some of the earlier history of Star Wars.
    Same with Episode II. Damn, nearly every movie I've seen in the theaters for the past 2-3 years, except maybe Being John Malkovich.

    That said; having seen MIIB yesterday - it sucked. It sucked really bad. I want my money back. I want my two hours back. Seems the only way Will Smith can get people to listen to his RAP anymore is to get in a movie and virally infect the soundtrack with it. The ONLY worthwhile bit was when he says his car originally had a black driver, but he kept getting pulled over. And I saw that in the trailer.

    And I'm not going to see Minority Report, because I'm boycotting the Church of Scientology.

    Depressingly, the next movie I'm looking forward to is LOTR II. At least I got to see the trailer. But even more, I'm looking forward to LOTR I's DVD with the extra hour of footage.
    Fuck this. Movies suck, work sucks, I'm the only person in the office - screw it I'm going to the beach.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  17. Big friggin plot holes by Papa+Legba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was hurt by how cheezy the plot holes in the movie where.

    We have an orginization that is in control of the worlds aliens and does all check ins yet has no backup plan for a rogue alien in the terminal?
    After agent K get's deneralized, and I mean as he gets out of the chair, he is talking about how he can't remember what they are looking for becuase he neralized himself to make him forget where he put it or what it was. Um what about the deneralizer you just used to get your memory back?

    I am not one to bitch about a movie using suspension of disbelief to get a point across. As I have told people before I am paying $8 to see fantasy, if I wanted to see real life I would go stand on the street corner for two hours. Their is a limit of course and I feel that this movie did not do enough to try and cover for that. Something as simple as having his memory coming back over years durring the course of the movie would have worked. With him hitting the relevant information at the right moment. Could have had some great jokes embedded in it, like having him bitch that agent X neuralized him after cheating at poker for example. The lack of thinking in the writing gives the movie the feel that it is a quick cash in for a buck and that is it.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
  18. I am soo tired by abolith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of people pining and moaning about how bad movies are. Get over it. If you go to a movie like this expect very little and hope for the most. Do that and You just might get more than you expected making the movie a better experiance all around. I figured MIB2 was going to suck, but I was happy to see a decent funny movie.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  19. It's fun watching you all miss the point... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I swear, you people are self destructing yourselves so that you can't enjoy the $7 spent on watching a movie.

    So far, I've read a lot of comments like 'unoriginal' or 'repackaged' or 'sucked' or whatever.

    Blah blah blah.

    You guys are kinda missing the point to watching a movie. The idea isn't to get exposed to some killer plot, the idea is to have fun. That means: Don't take it too seriously. MiiB is not part 2 of an epic trilogy. It's a comedy, it's meant to entertain for about 90 minutes or so. And it does do that. But, if you sit there being all critical about it the whole time, you're ruining it for yourself. Blame the movie if you want, but remember that's your $7.50 you're burning up.

    The first problem I see is that it's being horribly overanalyzed. One guy went on to say "they shouldn't have written out the chick at the end of MiB, bad bad bad.". Err okay. So you didn't like the movie because it didn't extend the first one by 90 minutes.

    Another guy went on to say '...another Wil Smith pop-corn action movie.' Can you say 'oversimplified'? Put it like that, and anything can sound stupid. 'Slashdot is like another Wil Smith pop-corn action movie'. See my point?

    You can't possibly enjoy a movie if you sit there and pretend you can make it better. (you can't. All you can do is 'fix' the problems you see with it.) Instead, just sit down, watch it, have fun. MiiB is meant to be silly. It's not meant to be epic, it's meant to be fun. Smile.

    If it's not your type of movie, don't go see it. Don't bug us about it either. We clear?

  20. Anyone else get a CGI short at showing? by Masem · · Score: 3, Informative
    I thought it was odd that when I saw it, there was a brief (10 minute) CGI animated short from ImageWorks called "The Chub-Chubs" (I think, the name didn't stick), that basically just had a bunch of sci-fi refs in it... did anyone else get this? It wasn't bad (not of the Pixar quality in both animation and writing), but it was pretty decent. I found it odd that it wasn't mentioned in any ads that I saw, nor any reviews of MIB2 that I saw as well. (Compared to the Dexter's Lab short in front of PPG, which I did know about...)

    It's interesting to note that Warner Bros. has confirmed they are making a large (more than 6) number of shorts destined for leadins to big screen movies using the standard Looney Toons characters (eg Bugs, Daffy, etc). Along with Pixar's bits and this ImageWorks thing, there appears to be trend towards this in the movie industry. Of course, there's tons more ads and movie previews of late (for PPG today, for example, I had at least 15 min of both), so this might not last long if it takes away too many screenings from theaters.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Anyone else get a CGI short at showing? by gblues · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is hardly new.

      40 years ago, WB (and other) cartoons were standard lead-ins to feature shows. Previews of coming attractions used to come at the end of the movie (hence why they are called "trailers"). But, with the large increase in credits, the trailers were moved to the front and the shorts were ditched entirely.

      Thank Pixar for bringing back the animated short, and other studios for acknowledging the market and following suit.

      I, for one, loved the "ChubChubbs" short (did anyone else notice that the yellow things resembled the Langoliers?).

      Nathan

  21. Umm... well, I liked the movie. by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I liked the opening, I liked the middle, and I liked the end (mostly). When I went in to this movie I wasn't expecting to see anything deep... just fun. And it was fun as hell. Frank "singing" along with "Who let the dogs out" was a riot. I don't care about plot in these movies, just entertainment. And it delivered full measure on that judging from the reaction of the audience at my showing. For those of you reading these reviews go see it and judge for yourself. At least you'll keep cool in the a/c.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  22. Many reasons to see Undercover Brother instead. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why you should see Undercover Brother instead of Men In Black II:
    • Undercover Brother is a lot funnier than MIIB.
    • Undercover Brother has more great "movie moments" than MIIB (e.g. the car spinning out without UB spilling a drop of his orange soda)
    • Undercover Brother and MIIB both involve secret agencies, but the secret agency of UB is more interesting this time around.
    • There are just as many 'gross out' scenes in Undercover Brother as there are in MIIB, and they're more believable. (Mayonayse...ick!)
    • Like MIIB, Undercover Brother is a parody. Unlike MIIB, Undercover Brother isn't a parody of itself.
    • Since Undercover Brother has been out for a few weeks, a greater percentage of the proceeds go to local movie theatres than go to the studios and the MPAA.
  23. I should have listened to the theme song by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, the first warning sign that this was going to be a crappy movie (unheeded by me and my wife) is the Will Smith song. If a plot can be neatly summarized in a hip hop song, that should be a clear indicator to just stay away from the theatre.