Slashdot Mirror


Genetically Engineered Big-brained Mice

StefanJ writes "'Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?' An item on MSNBC reports that researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston have produced mice with big, convoluted brains by inserting an single extra gene. I am reminded of two pieces of SF: Olaf Stapledon's novel Sirius, about a lab experiment that produces a brainy dog, and Bruce Sterling "Our Neural Chernobyl," in which the country is overrun with cunning coyotes and tribes of raccoons."

89 comments

  1. One small step for human kind..onegiantleapfordogs by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Huzzah! Bring in the Data Dogs! Ein* rocked.

    I wouldn't mind a smarter dog...
    *From Cowboy Bebop

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  2. Reminds me of... by n-baxley · · Score: 1, Offtopic
  3. Why were they killed? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 3, Funny
    from MSNBC: IT IS NOT yet clear whether the mice are smarter -- they were all killed soon after birth

    Um, why did they do that? Did the scientists just give the mice an X-ray and say "OMG THESE MOUSES ARE SO FREEKIN SMART EWWWWWWW I DONT WANT SMARTY-SMART MICE SQUISH IT SQUISH IT SQUISH IT!!!!!!!!!!!" and then they all stood on top of lab chairs waiting for their spouses to squish the brainy mice, (but of course they had to settle for the building custodian)?

    Look, I'm just guessing, okay?

    1. Re:Why were they killed? by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what's so frustrating about medical imaging technology. It's advanced enough to show what the brain looks like in the skull while the organism is still living, but you don't have a real good way of looking at the very fine structure without dissecting the brain. But, the things that's important to these researchers is what's happening at the cellular level. They want to know how the cells are qualitatively and quantitaively different. For that kind of analysis, they need cells, and a whole lot of 'em to get batches of cell stuff they can measure. My wife does this kind of work and it's amazing what they have to do in order to measure some of these chemicals and cell components.

    2. Re:Why were they killed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was part of the research to slice open their heads and examine their brains, probably. Or do you think they'd waste all that money preparing live mice for the MRI scanner when a sharp blade will do the trick?

    3. Re:Why were they killed? by Earl+The+Squirrel · · Score: 0

      ...because the scheme to take over the world failed big time.

    4. Re:Why were they killed? by tcm614ce · · Score: 1

      -- why did they do that?

      My Guess -- Overheard at ACME Labs:
      B: Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?
      P: Yes Brain, but where will we find rubber pants our size?
      B: No Pinky, If I disguise myself as a claymation construction worker, we can create our own internationally syndicated children's TV show. We'll become hugely popular and all the kids will worship us. Thence, we will taKe OvER tHE WORLD!
      P: Naaaaaaarf! Poit! Brilliant!....No wait, um.....One Thing Brain. Where are we going to find little ballet slippers for all the camera men?

      --
      Error: Success
    5. Re:Why were they killed? by margaret · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because imaging can't tell you things like:
      Is the beta-catenin really being overexpressed ?
      By how much?
      In which neurons?
      Has the expression of other proteins been altered too?

      To answer these kinds of questions, you need to stain thin slices of the brains or grind up the brains.

      -margaret

    6. Re: Why were they killed? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > from MSNBC: IT IS NOT yet clear whether the mice are smarter -- they were all killed soon after birth

      > Um, why did they do that?

      They caught them trying to take over the world.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Why were they killed? by 2g3-598hX · · Score: 1

      SO are you saying they were all killed to squish cell samples out of their skulls? Couldn't they just get little bits out and let them live. After all lots of people get by with half a frontal lobe...

      Does anyone know why they were killed? Was the experiment planned to work out that way? Even if so, you think they could be a bit more flexible and at least IQ test some of the mice.

    8. Re:Why were they killed? by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      They learn a lot by freezing the brains and putting super-thin slices on slides and examining them with microscopes. There are a lot of things that can be seen that way that you really can't see any other way. Even so, if I was on that project I would've been against killing ALL of them. I'd really like to see if there are any behavioral differences.

  4. of - have by tps12 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sorry, may God have mercy on our souls.

    Slow Down Cowboy!

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  5. All I can think of is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flowers for Algernon...Its really almost here.

    1. Re:All I can think of is.... by marcus · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there. When I first read that story I was a kid and I almost cried. Thirty years later I found the book(a collection) and read it again. Deja-vu all over again.

      --
      Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
      - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  6. Just imagine... by zenyu · · Score: 3, Funny


    If they gave this to a dolphin or a whale which already have larger brains than us, but presumably don't have our overabundance of the magic protein.

    Or our nearest neighbors like chimps and gorillas... Though I think it would be more interesting to give it exclusively to Bonobos, they'd probably write some interesting erotica ;)

    1. Re:Just imagine... by nomel · · Score: 1

      Someday we will regret doing all of these experimints...

      *Flashbacks of planet of the apes*

    2. Re:Just imagine... by perljon · · Score: 0

      Do you regret longer lifespans, being able to travel 60 miles in a single hour, computers, electricity, internet, refrigeration, air conditioners, food freezers, cold drinks, all the things plastic, carpets that last for years and years and years, etc. etc. etc.

      I dont'.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    3. Re:Just imagine... by Danse · · Score: 2

      Exactamundo! Even if we do cause the planet to implode eventually, we had a good run. If we're really clever, we'll eventually manage to learn to control the environment well enough to fix most of the problems we've made. Either that or we'll figure out how to get the hell off this rock and make our way to another one that we can start over with. Except we'll already have a huge head start experience and technology-wise.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:Just imagine... by bios+burn · · Score: 1

      actually the environment is alot better in the technological first world then in less advanced countries, we just have alot more well fed middle classers living better because of our technology to wine about how allowing more primative peoples advancement will destroy their cultures and "spiritual purity".

    5. Re:Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that the technological first world is stripping the rest of the world of resources on the cheap. We clear-cut entire forests. We dump our waste in other countries. We exploit entire populations by putting puppet governments in power (or at least helping to keep them in power) that will force the people to stay out of our way while we empty their country of natural resources. Big plus is that we only have to pay off a few high-ranking government officials instead of paying the going rate for such resources. So yeah, the first world is probably more guilty of fucking up the world than the third world ever will be.

    6. Re:Just imagine... by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      Or our nearest neighbors like chimps and gorillas...

      Or George W. Bush ...

    7. Re:Just imagine... by perljon · · Score: 0

      I remember repeatedly being told in elementary school when the first settlers reached Ohio, the forrest was so dence, a squirell could cross the state, jumping from branch to branch, never touching the ground.

      This was probably part of the ecologic soccer mom mentality of this place was great, but all this advancement fucked it up. However, I like this place, called Ohio, and I think the country/world is a better place because of the advancement that became possible in Ohio (and places like it, ie the rest of the United States) after the de-forrestation of the land. (Our country, in fact has the competative edge because we so easily feed the masses... look at history. The people who control the food control the world, or at least the part around it.

      There were three Indian 'countries' of the Americas, the Incas, the Maya's and the Aztecs. Two of them were a collection of city states, each controlled by individual governors who warred internally with each other. The third (Maya, I believe) was a country as we think of it today, where all the cities and states were controlled by a single government, and the armies of this country kept the peace. This was only possible through their ability to farm the land, and produce enough food to feed the non-food producing army.

      Now, if the cutting down the rain forrest of Brazil means that they'll have less snakes, bugs, and monkey's, but the Brazillians have a future similar to the United States, where the people of that country can keep the peace in the entire region, and promote peace, prosperity, and individual freedom, then thank good for chain-saws.

      And finally, I never understood the argument that we should preserve our resources, because soon the will be out. So the argument is, we have the power to not use these (trees, oil, and fresh water) resources. So what is the difference if we stop using them now, or we stop using them in 10 years? For example, if we are capable of replacing all cars that run on gasoline in order to not use up the oil in the world, won't we still be capable of that in 10-100 years when it is neccesary and economically driven? (ie, when we start to run out of oil, the price will go up, and it will become cheaper to run your car off (fill in alternative energy source) than oil based energies?)

      Finally, before I get off soap box, if you hate yourself, that's fine. If you are mad at yourself for having such an easy luxurious middle class American life, that's just fine. However, stop associating me with you, and direct your self-loathing to your self. Leave me and the rest of productive world alone. Hell, if you really need comfort for your self loathing, go hug a tree.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
  7. What are we going to do tonight, Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing we do every night. Try to take over the _world_!!!

    <i>It's Pinky, it's Pinky and the Brain, brain brain...</i>

  8. Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH by amarodeeps · · Score: 1

    ...to pull up another reference, reminds me a lot of the Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. Great book (at least it was when I was like 12 or so).

    1. Re:Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Or Baron von Wau-Wau in Spider Robinson's "Callahan" stories

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the one I was thinking of as well. A much better reference than the other two. I loved the Rats of NIMH. Very cool.

  9. What was it's name? by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 2

    Algernon, perhaps?

    In other news...
    A pastry factory custodian's brain was doubled in size by the insertion of an extra gene. He's reported to be in good spirits, and looks forward to a full life of intelligence and happiness.

    --


    *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    1. Re:What was it's name? by comp.sci · · Score: 1

      EnVisiCrypt is refering to a book with the title "Flowers for Algernon". The book deals about a mentally retarded man that is made extremely smart by operating him. The scientists tested the operation on a mouse called "Algernon" and after some time Algernon goes crazy and the whole expermiment is a failure. Read the book!

    2. Re:What was it's name? by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes. It's a short story written in 1959 that won a Hugo Award. Later expanded into a novel which was made into a movie, "Charly."

      I don't have the links but the IMDB probably lists it. Good book, but I thought the movie was so-so.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:What was it's name? by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 2

      I know what I was thinking of, that's why I made the reference. Geesh.

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    4. Re:What was it's name? by Telecommando · · Score: 2

      Well if you knew, why did you ask it as a question?
      Jeeze yourself.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    5. Re:What was it's name? by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 2

      I was asking the name of the mouse from the expirement...
      It was a joke...

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    6. Re:What was it's name? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Those of us who got it, got it and didn't need to reply. Those who didn't get it and replied with inane comments probably won't get it; you're wasting your bandwith trying to explain yourself to them. I'm slowly learning (ok, so I'm a slow learner -- I'm man^h^h^hstupid enough to admit my failings) not to reply to replies to my posts -- I find myself arguing when I meant to debate, but this is /.; the people here aren't interested in debate.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    7. Re:What was it's name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I need to keep that in mind. I keep getting stuck in mindless arguments here.

    8. Re:What was it's name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      after some time Algernon goes crazy

      algernon does not go crazy, he merely returns to his normal pre-experiment state.

    9. Re:What was it's name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who got it, got it and didn't need to reply. Those who didn't get it and replied with inane comments probably won't get it

      They need the extra gene.

  10. Manic Mice by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 4, Funny

    They said that the mice were "Killed soon after birth"... what they didn't say is that they were killed after leading a bloody rebellion that culminated in a tense showdown in the lab, with one of the engineered mice holding a poisoned needle to one of the researcher's throats.

    Luckily they were able to calm down the miscreant with a piece of cheese, and lured him far enough away from the researcher to turn him into a bloody splot on the (otherwise spotlessly clean linolium) floor.

    Back to you Bob.

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    1. Re:Manic Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, that was a great post!

  11. Yet Another Reference by disappear · · Score: 2

    The Lysenko Maze - David Grinnell - F&SF Jul '54

    A short story about hyperintelligent mice. OK, they were bred --- we didn't have DNA manipulation in '54, and for that matter the discovery of DNA was only in the near-future.

    The story's worth reading all the way through at least once.

    1. Re:Yet Another Reference by mi · · Score: 2

      Lysenko considered genetics anti-soviet and "imperialist whore". Even if DNA existed back then it wouldn't have had a chance with that monster, who held back the Soviet (and world) biology for years...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. This only got the section page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article, about a single gene that could revolutionize civilization, only got on the science section page. While an article about Perl 5.8.0 got FP. I don't think another slightly different version of Perl will change civilization as we know it.

    EDITORS: WHY ISN'T THIS FP!

    Maybe you should double-check with other editors to make sure stories are where they belong.

    1. Re:This only got the section page by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Maybe? Maybe? The editors should do a lot of things they aren't doing, but this is Slashdot so they're not interested in runing a quality news site, they're just interested in, in, in -- hell, I can't tell what the fuck they're interested in. Video games, better graphics cards for those video games, Linux, and Microsoft bashing, apparantly. Certainly not editing or any other activity that might require thought. I'm not even sure why they're called editors -- ever notice that they don't edit the stories they post?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:This only got the section page by StefanJ · · Score: 2

      I agree with you on the potential impact. But I submitted it as a Science section story, and that's where they put it.

    3. Re:This only got the section page by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Actually they do. The one story that I submitted that got posted was edited all around... what they *don't* do is spellcheckign

      (yes, that was intentional)

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  13. Rescaled images by nucal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In the MSNBC article, they rescaled the brain images to be about the same size - going to the original article (subscription req'd), the brains overexpressing ß-catenin look to be about twice the size of the normal ones.

    The researchers genetically altered the brain cells, but not bone growth - so I wonder whether the increased folding is a response to being crammed into a cranial cavity that is too small.

  14. Re:not such a good idea by TriciaMac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the early 1600's members of the church were saying much the same thing about Galileo and his support of Copernican heliocentric theory. Echoes were again heard with the introduction of Newtonian physics, and Darwin's natural selection. Throughout history people have feared and even violently supressed new ideas and methodologies that would later prove beneficial and increase our understanding of the wonderous and often mystifying universe that we live in. While I agree that new discoveries can be frightening, I don't think that we should even attempt to place limitations on the growth of the human sphere of knowledge (mostly,because we can't). We are, by nature, an inquisitive species and that trait has brought us some amazing things like computers( and there was MUCH rejoicing!), air-conditioning, antibiotics, books, Hitchhiker's Guide on compact disc, etc. At any given time in our past there were people saying," Hey, that's enough! We go much farther with all of this new-fangled learning and we are in grave danger!{Insert name of deity here} is going to punish us if we don't cut it out this instant!" The end result? We are already in a hell of our own creation where there are effective treatments for a vast number of diseases, where we have the tools to combat drought and famine, where we can accurately predict storms and the path of a hurricane, where we can communicate with loved ones across vast distances by simply pressing a few buttons, and where doomsday criers can post their warnings on the internet for all of the world to see! You see, we have always been "extremely close" to your imaginary line with our unlocking of seemingly insoluble mysteries and looking back, we find that that line was never really there.

  15. please not now by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh great!

    First it was H1B's from India, Pakistan, and China. Now we have to compete with smart mice also.

    Shudduv been a dentist like Mom warned.

    1. Re:please not now by sckeener · · Score: 2

      Oh great!

      First it was H1B's from India, Pakistan, and China. Now we have to compete with smart mice also.

      Shudduv been a dentist like Mom warned.


      Sounds like someone doesn't like having his cheese moved.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  16. eh, unlikely to be smarter by mikeee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If such a simple mutation could make you smarter, evolution would have found already. After all, intellegence is an evolutionary advantage, just look at all the chicks us geeks get...

    Quick! Kill those mice before they build the death ray to destroy us!

    1. Re:eh, unlikely to be smarter by StefanJ · · Score: 2

      Evolution isn't flawless, or biased toward intelligence. Big brains have worked well for us, so far, but it's not a given that it is the ultimate survival solution.

      It could be that evolution DID "create" brainy mice at one point, but that the metabolic cost outweighed the advantages.

      Or: The brains might have given an advantage, but the mice didn't live long enough for it to make a difference.

    2. Re:eh, unlikely to be smarter by nomel · · Score: 1

      Remember, for evolution, you have to have a mutation that is different from the norm, and the chances to have a mutation are insanely high. So the chances of having this specific gene mutate are insanely * insanely high...hehe

      Alse, if this gene were not at all dominant, then it would probably not be included in the offspring.

    3. Re:eh, unlikely to be smarter by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Or: The larger brains might have given them an advantage, but other mutations caused them to evolve into something other than mice. Perhaps rats are desended from mice that got the big-brain gene along with some other non-mouse genes (maybe the larger brain didn't work without a larger skull to put it in, and in getting that they also got an overall larger body to go with it).

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:eh, unlikely to be smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or geeks are not more intelligent then anybody else, maybe just a bit unsocial...

  17. Watch out... by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

    These must be those vastly hyperintelligent pandimensional mice that are actually experimenting on US!

    Head for the hills, the Vorgons are coming!!

    --

    Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  18. Imagine for a moment by marcus · · Score: 1

    What good would it would do to SMARTER PEOPLE!

    At the very least we would not have to put up with so many stupid ones.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  19. oops by marcus · · Score: 1

    Should have previewed...should read:

    What good it would do to have SMARTER PEOPLE!

    At the very least we would not have to put up with so many stupid ones.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  20. of mice and men by g4dget · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    What have men got to do with anything?

    1. Re:of mice and men by g4dget · · Score: 2

      Come on, if you don't get it, why waste your moderation points on it? Any geek worth his salt should know that that refers to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galazy.

  21. Mrs. Frisby, anyone? by derinax · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget about Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH!

    The movie even has curse words, deaths, and a psychedelic sequence of rats undergoing DNA mutation. Gotta love Don Bluth back when he was good.

  22. the result of 50 years of sci-fi by DopeThrone · · Score: 0

    it was only a matter of time before someone finally decided to go with the notion to create some super-animal. First we put ears on them, now we've made them with big brains. Just shows that those guys back in the fifties making the b-grade giant spider movies were onto something. Although this story seems much more familiar to "deep blue sea"

    --

    Righteousness postpones the inevitable
    http://burningaureole.caveism.net
  23. Spielberg knew ... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Looks like Spielberg's 'Pinky and the brain' was a prediction and not simply a cartoon - doh. Maybe the heading should have been

    Pinky: "Gee Brain, what are we going to do tonight?"
    Brain: "what we do every night - try to take over the world!"

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  24. full story by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1
    IT IS NOT yet clear whether the mice are smarter -- they were all killed soon after birth

    ...they were ridiculed for their thick eyeglasses and pocket protectors, and bullied to death by their dumber peers.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  25. Arthur always was a little confused about the mice by schmaltz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Earthman, the planet you lived on was commissioned, paid for, and run by mice. It was destroyed five minutes before the completion of the purpose for which it was built, and we've got to build another one."

    Only one word registered with Arthur.

    "Mice?" he said.

    "Indeed Earthman."

    "Look, sorry - are we talking about the little white furry things with the cheese fixation and women standing on tables screaming in early sixties sit coms?"

    Slartibartfast coughed politely.

    "Earthman," he said, "it is sometimes hard to follow your mode of speech. Remember I have been asleep inside this planet of Magrathea for five million years and know little of these early sixties sit coms of which you speak. These creatures you call mice, you see, they are not quite as they appear. They are merely the protrusion into our dimension of vast hyperintelligent pan- dimensional beings. The whole business with the cheese and the squeaking is just a front."

    The old man paused, and with a sympathetic frown continued.

    "They've been experimenting on you I'm afraid."

    Arthur thought about this for a second, and then his face cleared.

    "Ah no," he said, "I see the source of the misunderstanding now. No, look you see, what happened was that we used to do experiments on them. They were often used in behavioural research, Pavlov and all that sort of stuff. So what happened was that the mice would be set all sorts of tests, learning to ring bells, run around mazes and things so that the whole nature of the learning process could be examined. From our observations of their behaviour we were able to learn all sorts of things about our own ..."

    Arthur's voice tailed off.

    "Such subtlety ..." said Slartibartfast, "one has to admire it."

    "What?" said Arthur.

    "How better to disguise their real natures, and how better to guide your thinking. Suddenly running down a maze the wrong way, eating the wrong bit of cheese, unexpectedly dropping dead of myxomatosis, - if it's finely calculated the cumulative effect is enormous."

    He paused for effect.

    "You see, Earthman, they really are particularly clever hyperintelligent pan-dimensional beings. Your planet and people have formed the matrix of an organic computer running a ten-million-year research programme ...

    "Let me tell you the whole story. It'll take a little time."

    "Time," said Arthur weakly, "is not currently one of my problems."

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  26. Re:not such a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, now that we understand how to create chemical explosives like black powder, how to breed plants and animals to be our domesticated servants, and how to build pyramid structures that reach up to the very sky itself, we are treading dangerously close to that line! God of mercy indeed! Oh wait, all that happened millennia ago. My bad.

  27. You mean Lawnmower Man? by nbcjones · · Score: 1

    It's the same story, after all. And more /. readers are likely to recognize Lawnmower Man than Flowers for Algernon.

    1. Re:You mean Lawnmower Man? by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      I think you need to rethink. Other than idea of a mentally retarded man getting smarter, the two films have absolutely nothing in common.

      Flowers for Algernon (or the movie Charly which followed the plot amazingly well, a rarity in the SF movie world) is a realistic tragedy about a mentally retarded man who volunteers for an experiment, becomes a genius, then painfully has to watch his own bright new mind revert to retardation. It's well-plotted, character-driven, and highly believable, thoroughly deserving of the awards heaped upon it.

      Lawnmower Man (the movie, which bears no resemblance to the print story other than they're both examples of King at his laziest) is a tale of a mentally retarded man who somehow (never mind how, exactly) becomes a god in virtual reality and never reverts. The plot is lame and largely designed to justify CGI budget, the characters are cardboard cutouts, and it's about as believable as Tron.

      Same story? Not even close. Phenomenon is much closer, if you want a more recent flick than Charly.

  28. Pinky and the Brain by dh003i · · Score: 2

    They're Pinky and the Brain
    Pinky and the Brain:
    One is a genuis,
    The other's insane;
    They'll overthrow the earth,
    They'll rule with all their worth;
    They're Pinky,
    They're Pinky and the Brain
    Brain Brain Brain Brain
    Dun dun.

    LOL. Ok, but seriously, this is interesting. More interesting than seeing if mice can play chess or learn to read, is if this same technique can be applied on humans pre-birth, and if genetic engineering via virus-vectors could be used to apply it to the already-living (not just the unborn).

  29. Mr. Ages, anyone? by oldbox · · Score: 1
    While Sirius is a great book, I would have thought that the Rats of NIMH would have been the obvious reference .

    In my opinion, the book is vastly supirior to the movie of the same name.

    Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of Nimh

  30. Re:One small step for human kind..onegiantleapford by StefanJ · · Score: 2

    A dog smart enough to use a toilet would be a Good Thing.

    Of course, it might then also be smart enough to be a real pain in the ass.

  31. This is what really happened by nomel · · Score: 1

    "IT IS NOT yet clear whether the mice are smarter -- they were all killed soon after birth when they started unlocking their cages and yelling obscenities at the scientists -- but the scientists..."

  32. Re:One small step for human kind..onegiantleapford by Peter+T+Ermit · · Score: 1

    So long as it doesn't learn to read the newspaper, too. Then we'd never get the damn dogs outta the bathroom.

  33. Re:not such a good idea by perljon · · Score: 0

    Science is the discovery of God's ways.

    People who fear science becauase of their religion, are in fact showing their lack of faith. They are afraid that some day, some how, science will prove the non-existance of God. However, someone with strong faith will encourage science, as they know for fact, that it will prove God.

    Example: Evolution. Most religious people fight evolution, because they think it may help prove the non-existance of God. However, those with true faith embrace the theories, as the Genesis is God's process. Most Christians believe that God is truth, light, and love. Then why would God want you to not seek the truth? God Doesn't. Who are we to say, "No, God did not use evolution to ensure the unwatched preservation of his creation. God did not use evolution to create man's body from those that already existed.

    I don't want to turn this into an evolution discussion, because no matter how many of those I have had, no-one ever seems to change anyone's mind.

    However, no where have I ever read in the Bible the part about how humans should not try to discover God's ways and use them to manipulate our environment. (If so, everything, including Calendars that track the seasons are sac-religious).

    --
    This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
  34. Fractal? by 3rd_Floo · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did the scientists spend too much time creating the fractals that they pawned off as so called 'mri cross-sections'? =P

  35. Re:Arthur always was a little confused about the m by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    Truly a shame that Douglas Adams didn't live to see this.

  36. An extra gene? by gmulert · · Score: 1

    Huh, and I always thought it was exposure to Chemical X that caused brains to double in size.

    Oh well, at least this way is safer. The Chemical X route always seems to produce mad geniuses intent on taking over Townsville (when applied to primates, at any rate).

  37. And the topic of the day is... MDMA! by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Huh, and I always thought it was exposure to Chemical X that caused brains to double in size.

    Chemical X is apparently Ecstasy. I wonder what 'X' really does to human foetuses.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  38. Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Novel by Daniel Keyes.
    Mice, intelligence, Charlie. Remember?

  39. From the article.. by Kredal · · Score: 2

    Mouse brains normally have a smooth surface. Human brains are all wrinkled and folded, because they are squashed into the skull.

    Squashed... is that a medical term? (:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  40. I have to say it by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster or these!

    1. Re:I have to say it by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      OF these. Dammit. It was a stupid joke anyway, and then I have to go and fark it up.

  41. There is a worrisome developement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communicating solely via email from their fortified facility, the scientists responsible for this research have sent out numerous grant applications, along with purchase orders for large amounts of
    shredded cedar cage-lining, cheese, and machine tools.

  42. Mice may have died, rather than have been killed by Guppy · · Score: 2

    "from MSNBC: IT IS NOT yet clear whether the mice are smarter -- they were all killed soon after birth"

    After taking a look around Sciene Magazine's Website, I found a quote on their Science Now which is worded a little bit differently:

    "The mice died soon after birth, so the researchers do not know how the bigger brains would affect their behavior"

    This seems to suggest that the mice weren't euthanized -- instead, the modification itself was lethal. However, I couldn't find any confirmation of this in the text of the paper itself (Also on Science's website, requires subscription, though). The gene studied here, B-catenin, is expressed in numerous tissues throughout the developmental process, so I'd be a little surprised if such a major change yielded a viable organism.

  43. Or "The Amazing Maurice And His Educated Rodents" by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

    Or "The Amazing Maurice And His Educated Rodents" by Terry Pratchett. I'm reading it now. Pratchett's rats get big brains by eating from the garbage pile behind the Unseen University, but, in typical Pratchett fashion, they not only get intelligence, but also get ethics and religion in the bargain.

    Note that this isn't entirely off-topic. Although the book is a fantasy marketed toward teens and pre-teens, it actually addresses many issues in AI, animal rights, ethics, religion and bioengineering. Of course, if you've read other Discworld novels, you would know that already...

    --
    -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  44. Doesn't Anyone Remember... by astapleton · · Score: 1

    ...'The Secret of NIMH? Remember your movie history, then go back and reread this article...and then consider whether or not you really want to bulldoze that rosebush in your front yard...

    --
    "Courage is being afraid to do the Right Thing, and doing it anyway."
  45. Re:not such a good idea by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Who are we to say,[...] God did not use evolution to create man's body from those that already existed.

    Well, there's that bit in the bible (genesis) about how god made man from dirt in one day. So all the talk about man evolving over millions of years from "lesser" animals kinda contradicts that part.

    Prayer has no place in the public schools, just like facts have no place in organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

    "An upstart astrologer...This fool wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred Scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth." - Martin Luther on Copernicus


    So anyways, back to the mice...
    Big brains, eh?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  46. If the brains don't fit, try thinkgeek! by vidnet · · Score: 1
    Put one of these in the mouse cage:

    LED Binary Clock
    Check out this desktop binary timepiece. After a few minutes, you'll be able to read it right away while your friends and family stare in awe at your massive craniums...